Bison News
----------
-Changes in version 2.1b:
-
-* No user-visible changes.
-
-Changes in version 2.1a, 2006-02-13:
+Changes in version 2.3a+ (????-??-??):
+
+* The -g and --graph options now output graphs in Graphviz DOT format,
+ not VCG format.
+
+* The Yacc prologue alternatives from Bison 2.3a have been rewritten as the
+ following directives:
+
+ 1. %code {CODE}
+
+ Other than semantic actions, this is probably the most common place you
+ should write verbatim code for the parser implementation. For C/C++, it
+ replaces the traditional Yacc prologue, `%{CODE%}', for most purposes.
+ For Java, it inserts your CODE into the parser class. Compare with:
+
+ - `%{CODE%}' appearing after the first `%union {CODE}' in a C/C++
+ based grammar file. While Bison will continue to support `%{CODE%}'
+ for backward compatibility, `%code {CODE}' is cleaner as its
+ functionality does not depend on its position in the grammar file
+ relative to any `%union {CODE}'. Specifically, `%code {CODE}'
+ always inserts your CODE into the parser code file after the usual
+ contents of the parser header file.
+ - `%after-header {CODE}', which only Bison 2.3a supported.
+
+ 2. %requires {CODE}
+
+ This is the right place to write dependency code for externally exposed
+ definitions required by Bison. For C/C++, such exposed definitions are
+ those usually appearing in the parser header file. Thus, this is the
+ right place to define types referenced in `%union {CODE}' directives,
+ and it is the right place to override Bison's default YYSTYPE and
+ YYLTYPE definitions. For Java, this is the right place to write import
+ directives. Compare with:
+
+ - `%{CODE%}' appearing before the first `%union {CODE}' in a C/C++
+ based grammar file. Unlike `%{CODE%}', `%requires {CODE}' inserts
+ your CODE both into the parser code file and into the parser header
+ file since Bison's required definitions should depend on it in both
+ places.
+ - `%start-header {CODE}', which only Bison 2.3a supported.
+
+ 3. %provides {CODE}
+
+ This is the right place to write additional definitions you would like
+ Bison to expose externally. For C/C++, this directive inserts your CODE
+ both into the parser header file and into the parser code file after
+ Bison's required definitions. For Java, it inserts your CODE into the
+ parser java file after the parser class. Compare with:
+
+ - `%end-header {CODE}', which only Bison 2.3a supported.
+
+ 4. %code-top {CODE}
+
+ Occasionally for C/C++ it is desirable to insert code near the top of
+ the parser code file. For example:
+
+ %code-top {
+ #define _GNU_SOURCE
+ #include <stdio.h>
+ }
+
+ For Java, `%code-top {CODE}' is currently unused. Compare with:
+
+ - `%{CODE%}' appearing before the first `%union {CODE}' in a C/C++
+ based grammar file. `%code-top {CODE}' is cleaner as its
+ functionality does not depend on its position in the grammar file
+ relative to any `%union {CODE}'.
+ - `%before-header {CODE}', which only Bison 2.3a supported.
+
+ If you have multiple occurrences of any one of the above four directives,
+ Bison will concatenate the contents in the order they appear in the grammar
+ file.
+
+ Also see the new section `Prologue Alternatives' in the Bison manual.
+
+Changes in version 2.3a, 2006-09-13:
+
+* Instead of %union, you can define and use your own union type
+ YYSTYPE if your grammar contains at least one <type> tag.
+ Your YYSTYPE need not be a macro; it can be a typedef.
+ This change is for compatibility with other Yacc implementations,
+ and is required by POSIX.
+
+* Locations columns and lines start at 1.
+ In accordance with the GNU Coding Standards and Emacs.
+
+* You may now declare per-type and default %destructor's and %printer's:
+
+ For example:
+
+ %union { char *string; }
+ %token <string> STRING1
+ %token <string> STRING2
+ %type <string> string1
+ %type <string> string2
+ %union { char character; }
+ %token <character> CHR
+ %type <character> chr
+ %destructor { free ($$); } %symbol-default
+ %destructor { free ($$); printf ("%d", @$.first_line); } STRING1 string1
+ %destructor { } <character>
+
+ guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
+ semantic type tag other than `<character>', it passes its semantic value to
+ `free'. However, when the parser discards a `STRING1' or a `string1', it
+ also prints its line number to `stdout'. It performs only the second
+ `%destructor' in this case, so it invokes `free' only once.
+
+* Except for LALR(1) parsers in C with POSIX Yacc emulation enabled (with `-y',
+ `--yacc', or `%yacc'), Bison no longer generates #define statements for
+ associating token numbers with token names. Removing the #define statements
+ helps to sanitize the global namespace during preprocessing, but POSIX Yacc
+ requires them. Bison still generates an enum for token names in all cases.
+
+* Handling of traditional Yacc prologue blocks is now more consistent but
+ potentially incompatible with previous releases of Bison.
+
+ As before, you declare prologue blocks in your grammar file with the
+ `%{ ... %}' syntax. To generate the pre-prologue, Bison concatenates all
+ prologue blocks that you've declared before the first %union. To generate
+ the post-prologue, Bison concatenates all prologue blocks that you've
+ declared after the first %union.
+
+ Previous releases of Bison inserted the pre-prologue into both the header
+ file and the code file in all cases except for LALR(1) parsers in C. In the
+ latter case, Bison inserted it only into the code file. For parsers in C++,
+ the point of insertion was before any token definitions (which associate
+ token numbers with names). For parsers in C, the point of insertion was
+ after the token definitions.
+
+ Now, Bison never inserts the pre-prologue into the header file. In the code
+ file, it always inserts it before the token definitions.
+
+* Bison now provides a more flexible alternative to the traditional Yacc
+ prologue blocks: %before-header, %start-header, %end-header, and
+ %after-header.
+
+ For example, the following declaration order in the grammar file reflects the
+ order in which Bison will output these code blocks. However, you are free to
+ declare these code blocks in your grammar file in whatever order is most
+ convenient for you:
+
+ %before-header {
+ /* Bison treats this block like a pre-prologue block: it inserts it into
+ * the code file before the contents of the header file. It does *not*
+ * insert it into the header file. This is a good place to put
+ * #include's that you want at the top of your code file. A common
+ * example is `#include "system.h"'. */
+ }
+ %start-header {
+ /* Bison inserts this block into both the header file and the code file.
+ * In both files, the point of insertion is before any Bison-generated
+ * token, semantic type, location type, and class definitions. This is a
+ * good place to define %union dependencies, for example. */
+ }
+ %union {
+ /* Unlike the traditional Yacc prologue blocks, the output order for the
+ * new %*-header blocks is not affected by their declaration position
+ * relative to any %union in the grammar file. */
+ }
+ %end-header {
+ /* Bison inserts this block into both the header file and the code file.
+ * In both files, the point of insertion is after the Bison-generated
+ * definitions. This is a good place to declare or define public
+ * functions or data structures that depend on the Bison-generated
+ * definitions. */
+ }
+ %after-header {
+ /* Bison treats this block like a post-prologue block: it inserts it into
+ * the code file after the contents of the header file. It does *not*
+ * insert it into the header file. This is a good place to declare or
+ * define internal functions or data structures that depend on the
+ * Bison-generated definitions. */
+ }
+
+ If you have multiple occurrences of any one of the above declarations, Bison
+ will concatenate the contents in declaration order.
+
+* The option `--report=look-ahead' has been changed to `--report=lookahead'.
+ The old spelling still works, but is not documented and may be removed
+ in a future release.
+
+Changes in version 2.3, 2006-06-05:
+
+* GLR grammars should now use `YYRECOVERING ()' instead of `YYRECOVERING',
+ for compatibility with LALR(1) grammars.
+
+* It is now documented that any definition of YYSTYPE or YYLTYPE should
+ be to a type name that does not contain parentheses or brackets.
+
+Changes in version 2.2, 2006-05-19:
+
+* The distribution terms for all Bison-generated parsers now permit
+ using the parsers in nonfree programs. Previously, this permission
+ was granted only for Bison-generated LALR(1) parsers in C.
+
+* %name-prefix changes the namespace name in C++ outputs.
+
+* The C++ parsers export their token_type.
* Bison now allows multiple %union declarations, and concatenates
their contents together.
for previous releases of Bison, and this one.
If you wish to update, then make sure older version of Bison will
- fail using `%require "2.1a"'.
+ fail using `%require "2.2"'.
* DJGPP support added.
-
+\f
Changes in version 2.1, 2005-09-16:
* The C++ lalr1.cc skeleton supports %lex-param.
a syntax error associated with '%token NUM "number"' they might
print 'syntax error, unexpected number' instead of 'syntax error,
unexpected "number"'.
-
+\f
Changes in version 2.0, 2004-12-25:
* Possibly-incompatible changes
This is a GNU extension.
- The option `--report=lookahead' was changed to `--report=look-ahead'.
- The old spelling still works, but is not documented and will be
- removed.
+ [However, this was changed back after 2.3.]
- Experimental %destructor support has been added to lalr1.cc.
produces additional information:
- itemset
complete the core item sets with their closure
- - lookahead [changed to `look-ahead' in 1.875e and later]
- explicitly associate look-ahead tokens to items
+ - lookahead [changed to `look-ahead' in 1.875e through 2.3, but changed back]
+ explicitly associate lookahead tokens to items
- solved
describe shift/reduce conflicts solving.
Bison used to systematically output this information on top of