+ /* Figure out the actions for the specified state, indexed by
+ lookahead token type. */
+
+ muscle_insert_rule_number_table ("defact", yydefact,
+ yydefact[0], 1, nstates);
+
+ /* Figure out what to do after reducing with each rule, depending on
+ the saved state from before the beginning of parsing the data
+ that matched this rule. */
+ muscle_insert_state_number_table ("defgoto", yydefgoto,
+ yydefgoto[0], 1, nsyms - ntokens);
+
+
+ /* Output PACT. */
+ muscle_insert_base_table ("pact", base,
+ base[0], 1, nstates);
+ MUSCLE_INSERT_INT ("pact_ninf", base_ninf);
+
+ /* Output PGOTO. */
+ muscle_insert_base_table ("pgoto", base,
+ base[nstates], nstates + 1, nvectors);
+
+ muscle_insert_base_table ("table", table,
+ table[0], 1, high + 1);
+ MUSCLE_INSERT_INT ("table_ninf", table_ninf);
+
+ muscle_insert_base_table ("check", check,
+ check[0], 1, high + 1);
+
+ /* GLR parsing slightly modifies YYTABLE and YYCHECK (and thus
+ YYPACT) so that in states with unresolved conflicts, the default
+ reduction is not used in the conflicted entries, so that there is
+ a place to put a conflict pointer.
+
+ This means that YYCONFLP and YYCONFL are nonsense for a non-GLR
+ parser, so we could avoid accidents by not writing them out in
+ that case. Nevertheless, it seems even better to be able to use
+ the GLR skeletons even without the non-deterministic tables. */
+ muscle_insert_unsigned_int_table ("conflict_list_heads", conflict_table,
+ conflict_table[0], 1, high + 1);
+ muscle_insert_unsigned_int_table ("conflicting_rules", conflict_list,
+ 0, 1, conflict_list_cnt);