@cindex freeing discarded symbols
@findex %destructor
-Some symbols can be discarded by the parser. During error recovery
-(@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed on the stack and tokens
-coming from the rest of the file are discarded until the parser falls on
-its feet. If the parser runs out of memory, all the symbols on the
-stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it must discard
-the start symbol.
+During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
+on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
+until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
+or if the parsing is cut by @code{YYACCEPT} or @code{YYABORT}, all the
+symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
+must discard the start symbol.
When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
-The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that
-is called when a symbol is discarded.
+The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
+symbol is automatically discarded.
@deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
@findex %destructor
with the discarded symbol. The additional parser parameters are also
available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
@code{yyparse}}).
-
-@strong{Warning:} as of Bison 2.1, this feature is still
-experimental, as there has not been enough user feedback. In particular,
-the syntax might still change.
@end deffn
For instance:
guarantees that when a @code{STRING} or a @code{string} is discarded,
its associated memory will be freed.
-Note that in the future, Bison might also consider that right hand side
-members that are not mentioned in the action can be destroyed. For
-instance, in:
-
-@smallexample
-comment: "/*" STRING "*/";
-@end smallexample
-
-@noindent
-the parser is entitled to destroy the semantic value of the
-@code{string}. Of course, this will not apply to the default action;
-compare:
-
-@smallexample
-typeless: string; // $$ = $1 does not apply; $1 is destroyed.
-typefull: string; // $$ = $1 applies, $1 is not destroyed.
-@end smallexample
-
@sp 1
@cindex discarded symbols
@item
incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
@item
-the current look-ahead and the entire stack when the parser aborts
-(either via an explicit call to @code{YYABORT}, or as a consequence of
-a failed error recovery or of memory exhaustion), and
+the current look-ahead and the entire stack (except the current
+right-hand side symbols) when the parser aborts (either via an explicit
+call to @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or as a consequence of a
+failed error recovery or of memory exhaustion), and
@item
the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
@end itemize
+Note that right-hand size symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a
+syntax error via @code{YYERROR} are not reclaimed. As a thumb rule,
+destructors are invoked only when you do not have other means to manage
+the memory.
@node Expect Decl
@subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
%expect @var{n}
@end example
-Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should be
-no warning if there are @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no
-reduce/reduce conflicts. The usual warning is
-given if there are either more or fewer conflicts, or if there are any
-reduce/reduce conflicts.
+Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
+be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
+Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
+from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
-For normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more serious,
-and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
-reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With @acronym{GLR} parsers, however,
-both shift/reduce and reduce/reduce are routine (otherwise, there
-would be no need to use @acronym{GLR} parsing). Therefore, it is also possible
-to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts in @acronym{GLR}
-parsers, using the declaration:
+For normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
+serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
+reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With @acronym{GLR}
+parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
+there would be no need to use @acronym{GLR} parsing. Therefore, it is
+also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
+in @acronym{GLR} parsers, using the declaration:
@example
%expect-rr @var{n}
@item
Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
-number which Bison printed.
+number which Bison printed. With @acronym{GLR} parsers, add an
+@code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
@end itemize
-Now Bison will stop annoying you if you do not change the number of
-conflicts, but it will warn you again if changes in the grammar result
-in more or fewer conflicts.
+Now Bison will warn you if you introduce an unexpected conflict, but
+will keep silent otherwise.
@node Start Decl
@subsection The Start-Symbol