-*- outline -*-
-* src/reader.c
-** Complete parse_skel_decl () with parse_dquoted_param ().
-** Check and cleanup for CPP-out code.
-
-* src/output.c
-** Output sub-skeleton files.
-*** Useful for %no_parser.
-**** New skeleton.
-** Cleanup dirty CPP-out code.
-** s/definitions/prologue/ s/user_code/epilogue/ [ok].
-** s/macro/muscle/
-** Synchronize `#line' directive with user file.
-
-* src/getargs.c src/lex.c
-** Synchronize percent and command line options.
-
-* src/macrotab.[ch]
-** Removing warnings when compiling. (gcc-warnings) [ok].
-** s/macro/muscle/
+* Coding system independence
+Paul notes:
+
+ Currently Bison assumes 8-bit bytes (i.e. that UCHAR_MAX is
+ 255). It also assumes that the 8-bit character encoding is
+ the same for the invocation of 'bison' as it is for the
+ invocation of 'cc', but this is not necessarily true when
+ people run bison on an ASCII host and then use cc on an EBCDIC
+ host. I don't think these topics are worth our time
+ addressing (unless we find a gung-ho volunteer for EBCDIC or
+ PDP-10 ports :-) but they should probably be documented
+ somewhere.
+
+* Using enums instead of int for tokens.
+Paul suggests:
+
+ #ifndef YYTOKENTYPE
+ # if defined (__STDC__) || defined (__cplusplus)
+ /* Put the tokens into the symbol table, so that GDB and other debuggers
+ know about them. */
+ enum yytokentype {
+ FOO = 256,
+ BAR,
+ ...
+ };
+ /* POSIX requires `int' for tokens in interfaces. */
+ # define YYTOKENTYPE int
+ # endif
+ #endif
+ #define FOO 256
+ #define BAR 257
+ ...
+
+> I'm in favor of
+>
+> %token FOO 256
+> %token BAR 257
+>
+> and Bison moves error into 258.
+
+Yes, I think that's a valid extension too, if the user doesn't define
+the token number for error.
+
+* Output directory
+Akim:
+
+| I consider this to be a bug in bison:
+|
+| /tmp % mkdir src
+| /tmp % cp ~/src/bison/tests/calc.y src
+| /tmp % mkdir build && cd build
+| /tmp/build % bison ../src/calc.y
+| /tmp/build % cd ..
+| /tmp % ls -l build src
+| build:
+| total 0
+|
+| src:
+| total 32
+| -rw-r--r-- 1 akim lrde 27553 oct 2 16:31 calc.tab.c
+| -rw-r--r-- 1 akim lrde 3335 oct 2 16:31 calc.y
+|
+|
+| Would it be safe to change this behavior to something more reasonable?
+| Do you think some people depend upon this?
+
+Jim:
+
+Is it that behavior documented?
+If so, then it's probably not reasonable to change it.
+I've Cc'd the automake list, because some of automake's
+rules use bison through $(YACC) -- though I'll bet they
+all use it in yacc-compatible mode.
+
+Pavel:
+
+Hello, Jim and others!
+
+> Is it that behavior documented?
+> If so, then it's probably not reasonable to change it.
+> I've Cc'd the automake list, because some of automake's
+> rules use bison through $(YACC) -- though I'll bet they
+> all use it in yacc-compatible mode.
+
+Yes, Automake currently used bison in Automake-compatible mode, but it
+would be fair for Automake to switch to the native mode as long as the
+processed files are distributed and "missing" emulates bison.
+
+In any case, the makefiles should specify the output file explicitly
+instead of relying on weird defaults.
+
+> | src:
+> | total 32
+> | -rw-r--r-- 1 akim lrde 27553 oct 2 16:31 calc.tab.c
+> | -rw-r--r-- 1 akim lrde 3335 oct 2 16:31 calc.y
+
+This is not _that_ ugly as it seems - with Automake you want to put
+sources where they belong - to the source directory.
+
+> | This is not _that_ ugly as it seems - with Automake you want to put
+> | sources where they belong - to the source directory.
+>
+> The difference source/build you are referring to is based on Automake
+> concepts. They have no sense at all for tools such as bison or gcc
+> etc. They have input and output. I do not want them to try to grasp
+> source/build. I want them to behave uniformly: output *here*.
+
+I realize that.
+
+It's unfortunate that the native mode of Bison behaves in a less uniform
+way than the yacc mode. I agree with your point. Bison maintainters may
+want to fix it along with the documentation.
+
+
+* Unit rules
+Maybe we could expand unit rules, i.e., transform
+
+ exp: arith | bool;
+ arith: exp '+' exp;
+ bool: exp '&' exp;
+
+into
+
+ exp: exp '+' exp | exp '&' exp;
+
+when there are no actions. This can significantly speed up some
+grammars.
+
+* Stupid error messages
+An example shows it easily:
+
+src/bison/tests % ./testsuite -k calc,location,error-verbose -l
+GNU Bison 1.49a test suite test groups:
+
+ NUM: FILENAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME
+ KEYWORDS
+
+ 51: calc.at:440 Calculator --locations --yyerror-verbose
+ 52: calc.at:442 Calculator --defines --locations --name-prefix=calc --verbose --yacc --yyerror-verbose
+ 54: calc.at:445 Calculator --debug --defines --locations --name-prefix=calc --verbose --yacc --yyerror-verbose
+src/bison/tests % ./testsuite 51 -d
+## --------------------------- ##
+## GNU Bison 1.49a test suite. ##
+## --------------------------- ##
+ 51: calc.at:440 ok
+## ---------------------------- ##
+## All 1 tests were successful. ##
+## ---------------------------- ##
+src/bison/tests % cd ./testsuite.dir/51
+tests/testsuite.dir/51 % echo "()" | ./calc
+1.2-1.3: parse error, unexpected ')', expecting error or "number" or '-' or '('
+
+* yyerror, yyprint interface
+It should be improved, in particular when using Bison features such as
+locations, and YYPARSE_PARAMS. For the time being, it is recommended
+to #define yyerror and yyprint to steal internal variables...
+
+* read_pipe.c
+This is not portable to DOS for instance. Implement a more portable
+scheme. Sources of inspiration include GNU diff, and Free Recode.
+
+* Memory leaks in the generator
+A round of memory leak clean ups would be most welcome. Dmalloc,
+Checker GCC, Electric Fence, or Valgrind: you chose your tool.
+
+* Memory leaks in the parser
+The same applies to the generated parsers. In particular, this is
+critical for user data: when aborting a parsing, when handling the
+error token etc., we often throw away yylval without giving a chance
+of cleaning it up to the user.
+
+* NEWS
+Sort from 1.31 NEWS.
+
+* Prologue
+The %union is declared after the user C declarations. It can be
+a problem if YYSTYPE is declared after the user part. []
+
+Actually, the real problem seems that the %union ought to be output
+where it was defined. For instance, in gettext/intl/plural.y, we
+have:
+
+ %{
+ ...
+ #include "gettextP.h"
+ ...
+ %}
+
+ %union {
+ unsigned long int num;
+ enum operator op;
+ struct expression *exp;
+ }
+
+ %{
+ ...
+ static int yylex PARAMS ((YYSTYPE *lval, const char **pexp));
+ ...
+ %}
+
+Where the first part defines struct expression, the second uses it to
+define YYSTYPE, and the last uses YYSTYPE. Only this order is valid.
+
+Note that we have the same problem with GCC.
+
+* --graph
+Show reductions. []
+
+* Broken options ?
+** %no-lines [ok]
+** %no-parser []
+** %pure-parser []
+** %semantic-parser []
+** %token-table []
+** Options which could use parse_dquoted_param ().
+Maybe transfered in lex.c.
+*** %skeleton [ok]
+*** %output []
+*** %file-prefix []
+*** %name-prefix []
+
+** Skeleton strategy. []
+Must we keep %no-parser?
+ %token-table?
+*** New skeletons. []
* src/print_graph.c
-** Find the best graph parameters.
+Find the best graph parameters. []
* doc/bison.texinfo
-** Echo modifications of prologue and epilogue.
-** Add informations about YYERROR_VERBOSE.
-** Add explainations about skeleton muscles.
-** Add explainations about %skeleton.
+** Update
+informations about ERROR_VERBOSE. []
+** Add explainations about
+skeleton muscles. []
+%skeleton. []
+
+* testsuite
+** tests/pure-parser.at []
+New tests.
+
+* Debugging parsers
+
+From Greg McGary:
+
+akim demaille <akim.demaille@epita.fr> writes:
+
+> With great pleasure! Nonetheless, things which are debatable
+> (or not, but just `big') should be discuss in `public': something
+> like help- or bug-bison@gnu.org is just fine. Jesse and I are there,
+> but there is also Jim and some other people.
+
+I have no idea whether it qualifies as big or controversial, so I'll
+just summarize for you. I proposed this change years ago and was
+surprised that it was met with utter indifference!
+
+This debug feature is for the programs/grammars one develops with
+bison, not for debugging bison itself. I find that the YYDEBUG
+output comes in a very inconvenient format for my purposes.
+When debugging gcc, for instance, what I want is to see a trace of
+the sequence of reductions and the line#s for the semantic actions
+so I can follow what's happening. Single-step in gdb doesn't cut it
+because to move from one semantic action to the next takes you through
+lots of internal machinery of the parser, which is uninteresting.
+
+The change I made was to the format of the debug output, so that it
+comes out in the format of C error messages, digestible by emacs
+compile mode, like so:
+
+grammar.y:1234: foo: bar(0x123456) baz(0x345678)
+
+where "foo: bar baz" is the reduction rule, whose semantic action
+appears on line 1234 of the bison grammar file grammar.y. The hex
+numbers on the rhs tokens are the parse-stack values associated with
+those tokens. Of course, yytype might be something totally
+incompatible with that representation, but for the most part, yytype
+values are single words (scalars or pointers). In the case of gcc,
+they're most often pointers to tree nodes. Come to think of it, the
+right thing to do is to make the printing of stack values be
+user-definable. It would also be useful to include the filename &
+line# of the file being parsed, but the main filename & line# should
+continue to be that of grammar.y
+
+Anyway, this feature has saved my life on numerous occasions. The way
+I customarily use it is to first run bison with the traces on, isolate
+the sequence of reductions that interests me, put those traces in a
+buffer and force it into compile-mode, then visit each of those lines
+in the grammar and set breakpoints with C-x SPACE. Then, I can run
+again under the control of gdb and stop at each semantic action.
+With the hex addresses of tree nodes, I can inspect the values
+associated with any rhs token.
+
+You like?
+
+* input synclines
+Some users create their foo.y files, and equip them with #line. Bison
+should recognize these, and preserve them.
+
+* BTYacc
+See if we can integrate backtracking in Bison. Contact the BTYacc
+maintainers.
+
+* Automaton report
+Display more clearly the lookaheads for each item.
+
+* RR conflicts
+See if we can use precedence between rules to solve RR conflicts. See
+what POSIX says.
+
+* Precedence
+It is unfortunate that there is a total order for precedence. It
+makes it impossible to have modular precedence information. We should
+move to partial orders.
+
+* Parsing grammars
+Rewrite the reader in Bison.
+
+* Problems with aliases
+From: "Baum, Nathan I" <s0009525@chelt.ac.uk>
+Subject: Token Alias Bug
+To: "'bug-bison@gnu.org'" <bug-bison@gnu.org>
+
+I've noticed a bug in bison. Sadly, our eternally wise sysadmins won't let
+us use CVS, so I can't find out if it's been fixed already...
+
+Basically, I made a program (in flex) that went through a .y file looking
+for "..."-tokens, and then outputed a %token
+line for it. For single-character ""-tokens, I reasoned, I could just use
+[%token 'A' "A"]. However, this causes Bison to output a [#define 'A' 65],
+which cppp chokes on, not unreasonably. (And even if cppp didn't choke, I
+obviously wouldn't want (char)'A' to be replaced with (int)65 throughout my
+code.
+
+Bison normally forgoes outputing a #define for a character token. However,
+it always outputs an aliased token -- even if the token is an alias for a
+character token. We don't want that. The problem is in /output.c/, as I
+recall. When it outputs the token definitions, it checks for a character
+token, and then checks for an alias token. If the character token check is
+placed after the alias check, then it works correctly.
+
+Alias tokens seem to be something of a kludge. What about an [%alias "..."]
+command...
+
+ %alias T_IF "IF"
+
+Hmm. I can't help thinking... What about a --generate-lex option that
+creates an .l file for the alias tokens used... (Or an option to make a
+gperf file, etc...)
+
+* Presentation of the report file
+From: "Baum, Nathan I" <s0009525@chelt.ac.uk>
+Subject: Token Alias Bug
+To: "'bug-bison@gnu.org'" <bug-bison@gnu.org>
+
+I've also noticed something, that whilst not *wrong*, is inconvienient: I
+use the verbose mode to help find the causes of unresolved shift/reduce
+conflicts. However, this mode insists on starting the .output file with a
+list of *resolved* conflicts, something I find quite useless. Might it be
+possible to define a -v mode, and a -vv mode -- Where the -vv mode shows
+everything, but the -v mode only tells you what you need for examining
+conflicts? (Or, perhaps, a "*** This state has N conflicts ***" marker above
+each state with conflicts.)
+
+
+-----
+
+Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+This file is part of GNU Autoconf.
+
+GNU Autoconf is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
+any later version.
-* tests/
-** Repair Bison to success tests. [ok]
+GNU Autoconf is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+GNU General Public License for more details.
+You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+along with autoconf; see the file COPYING. If not, write to
+the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
+Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
projects / bison.git / blobdiff