]> git.saurik.com Git - bison.git/blame_incremental - tests/conflicts.at
tests: clean up push.at test group titles.
[bison.git] / tests / conflicts.at
... / ...
CommitLineData
1# Exercising Bison on conflicts. -*- Autotest -*-
2
3# Copyright (C) 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2009 Free Software
4# Foundation, Inc.
5
6# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
7# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
8# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
9# (at your option) any later version.
10#
11# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
12# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
13# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
14# GNU General Public License for more details.
15#
16# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
17# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
18
19AT_BANNER([[Conflicts.]])
20
21
22## ---------------- ##
23## S/R in initial. ##
24## ---------------- ##
25
26# I once hacked Bison in such a way that it lost its reductions on the
27# initial state (because it was confusing it with the last state). It
28# took me a while to strip down my failures to this simple case. So
29# make sure it finds the s/r conflict below.
30
31AT_SETUP([S/R in initial])
32
33AT_DATA([[input.y]],
34[[%expect 1
35%%
36exp: e 'e';
37e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
38]])
39
40AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
41[[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: e: /* empty */
42]])
43
44AT_CLEANUP
45
46
47## ------------------- ##
48## %nonassoc and eof. ##
49## ------------------- ##
50
51AT_SETUP([%nonassoc and eof])
52
53AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y],
54[[
55%{
56#include <stdio.h>
57#include <stdlib.h>
58#include <string.h>
59
60#define YYERROR_VERBOSE 1
61static void
62yyerror (const char *msg)
63{
64 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", msg);
65}
66
67/* The current argument. */
68static const char *input;
69
70static int
71yylex (void)
72{
73 static size_t toknum;
74 if (! (toknum <= strlen (input)))
75 abort ();
76 return input[toknum++];
77}
78
79%}
80
81%nonassoc '<' '>'
82
83%%
84expr: expr '<' expr
85 | expr '>' expr
86 | '0'
87 ;
88%%
89int
90main (int argc, const char *argv[])
91{
92 input = argc <= 1 ? "" : argv[1];
93 return yyparse ();
94}
95]])
96
97# Specify the output files to avoid problems on different file systems.
98AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
99AT_COMPILE([input])
100
101AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
102AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
103 [syntax error, unexpected '<'
104])
105
106AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
107AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
108 [syntax error, unexpected '>'
109])
110
111AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
112 [syntax error, unexpected '>'
113])
114
115# We must disable default reductions in inconsistent states in order to
116# have an explicit list of all expected tokens. (However, unless we use
117# canonical LR, lookahead sets are merged for different left contexts,
118# so it is still possible to have extra incorrect tokens in the expected
119# list. That just doesn't happen to be a problem for this test case.)
120
121AT_BISON_CHECK([-Dlr.default-reductions=consistent -o input.c input.y])
122AT_COMPILE([input])
123
124AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
125AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
126 [syntax error, unexpected '<', expecting $end
127])
128
129AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
130AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
131 [syntax error, unexpected '>', expecting $end
132])
133
134AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
135 [syntax error, unexpected '>', expecting $end
136])
137
138AT_CLEANUP
139
140
141
142## ------------------------- ##
143## Unresolved SR Conflicts. ##
144## ------------------------- ##
145
146AT_SETUP([Unresolved SR Conflicts])
147
148AT_KEYWORDS([report])
149
150AT_DATA([input.y],
151[[%token NUM OP
152%%
153exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
154]])
155
156AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
157[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
158])
159
160# Check the contents of the report.
161AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
162[[State 5 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
163
164
165Grammar
166
167 0 $accept: exp $end
168
169 1 exp: exp OP exp
170 2 | NUM
171
172
173Terminals, with rules where they appear
174
175$end (0) 0
176error (256)
177NUM (258) 2
178OP (259) 1
179
180
181Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
182
183$accept (5)
184 on left: 0
185exp (6)
186 on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
187
188
189state 0
190
191 0 $accept: . exp $end
192 1 exp: . exp OP exp
193 2 | . NUM
194
195 NUM shift, and go to state 1
196
197 exp go to state 2
198
199
200state 1
201
202 2 exp: NUM .
203
204 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
205
206
207state 2
208
209 0 $accept: exp . $end
210 1 exp: exp . OP exp
211
212 $end shift, and go to state 3
213 OP shift, and go to state 4
214
215
216state 3
217
218 0 $accept: exp $end .
219
220 $default accept
221
222
223state 4
224
225 1 exp: . exp OP exp
226 1 | exp OP . exp
227 2 | . NUM
228
229 NUM shift, and go to state 1
230
231 exp go to state 5
232
233
234state 5
235
236 1 exp: exp . OP exp
237 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
238
239 OP shift, and go to state 4
240
241 OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
242 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
243]])
244
245AT_CLEANUP
246
247
248
249## ----------------------- ##
250## Resolved SR Conflicts. ##
251## ----------------------- ##
252
253AT_SETUP([Resolved SR Conflicts])
254
255AT_KEYWORDS([report])
256
257AT_DATA([input.y],
258[[%token NUM OP
259%left OP
260%%
261exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
262]])
263
264AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y])
265
266# Check the contents of the report.
267AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
268[[Grammar
269
270 0 $accept: exp $end
271
272 1 exp: exp OP exp
273 2 | NUM
274
275
276Terminals, with rules where they appear
277
278$end (0) 0
279error (256)
280NUM (258) 2
281OP (259) 1
282
283
284Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
285
286$accept (5)
287 on left: 0
288exp (6)
289 on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
290
291
292state 0
293
294 0 $accept: . exp $end
295 1 exp: . exp OP exp
296 2 | . NUM
297
298 NUM shift, and go to state 1
299
300 exp go to state 2
301
302
303state 1
304
305 2 exp: NUM .
306
307 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
308
309
310state 2
311
312 0 $accept: exp . $end
313 1 exp: exp . OP exp
314
315 $end shift, and go to state 3
316 OP shift, and go to state 4
317
318
319state 3
320
321 0 $accept: exp $end .
322
323 $default accept
324
325
326state 4
327
328 1 exp: . exp OP exp
329 1 | exp OP . exp
330 2 | . NUM
331
332 NUM shift, and go to state 1
333
334 exp go to state 5
335
336
337state 5
338
339 1 exp: exp . OP exp
340 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
341
342 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
343
344 Conflict between rule 1 and token OP resolved as reduce (%left OP).
345]])
346
347AT_CLEANUP
348
349
350## -------------------------------- ##
351## Defaulted Conflicted Reduction. ##
352## -------------------------------- ##
353
354# When there are RR conflicts, some rules are disabled. Usually it is
355# simply displayed as:
356#
357# $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
358# $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
359#
360# But when `reduce 3' is the default action, we'd produce:
361#
362# $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
363# $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
364#
365# In this precise case (a reduction is masked by the default
366# reduction), we make the `reduce 3' explicit:
367#
368# $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
369# $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
370# $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
371#
372# Maybe that's not the best display, but then, please propose something
373# else.
374
375AT_SETUP([Defaulted Conflicted Reduction])
376AT_KEYWORDS([report])
377
378AT_DATA([input.y],
379[[%%
380exp: num | id;
381num: '0';
382id : '0';
383%%
384]])
385
386AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
387[[input.y: conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
388input.y:4.6-8: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: id: '0'
389]])
390
391# Check the contents of the report.
392AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
393[[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
394
395 4 id: '0'
396
397
398State 1 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
399
400
401Grammar
402
403 0 $accept: exp $end
404
405 1 exp: num
406 2 | id
407
408 3 num: '0'
409
410 4 id: '0'
411
412
413Terminals, with rules where they appear
414
415$end (0) 0
416'0' (48) 3 4
417error (256)
418
419
420Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
421
422$accept (4)
423 on left: 0
424exp (5)
425 on left: 1 2, on right: 0
426num (6)
427 on left: 3, on right: 1
428id (7)
429 on left: 4, on right: 2
430
431
432state 0
433
434 0 $accept: . exp $end
435 1 exp: . num
436 2 | . id
437 3 num: . '0'
438 4 id: . '0'
439
440 '0' shift, and go to state 1
441
442 exp go to state 2
443 num go to state 3
444 id go to state 4
445
446
447state 1
448
449 3 num: '0' . [$end]
450 4 id: '0' . [$end]
451
452 $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
453 $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
454 $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
455
456
457state 2
458
459 0 $accept: exp . $end
460
461 $end shift, and go to state 5
462
463
464state 3
465
466 1 exp: num .
467
468 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
469
470
471state 4
472
473 2 exp: id .
474
475 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
476
477
478state 5
479
480 0 $accept: exp $end .
481
482 $default accept
483]])
484
485AT_CLEANUP
486
487
488
489
490## -------------------- ##
491## %expect not enough. ##
492## -------------------- ##
493
494AT_SETUP([%expect not enough])
495
496AT_DATA([input.y],
497[[%token NUM OP
498%expect 0
499%%
500exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
501]])
502
503AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
504[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
505input.y: expected 0 shift/reduce conflicts
506])
507AT_CLEANUP
508
509
510## --------------- ##
511## %expect right. ##
512## --------------- ##
513
514AT_SETUP([%expect right])
515
516AT_DATA([input.y],
517[[%token NUM OP
518%expect 1
519%%
520exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
521]])
522
523AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
524AT_CLEANUP
525
526
527## ------------------ ##
528## %expect too much. ##
529## ------------------ ##
530
531AT_SETUP([%expect too much])
532
533AT_DATA([input.y],
534[[%token NUM OP
535%expect 2
536%%
537exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
538]])
539
540AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
541[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
542input.y: expected 2 shift/reduce conflicts
543])
544AT_CLEANUP
545
546
547## ------------------------------- ##
548## %expect with reduce conflicts. ##
549## ------------------------------- ##
550
551AT_SETUP([%expect with reduce conflicts])
552
553AT_DATA([input.y],
554[[%expect 0
555%%
556program: a 'a' | a a;
557a: 'a';
558]])
559
560AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
561[input.y: conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
562input.y: expected 0 reduce/reduce conflicts
563])
564AT_CLEANUP
565
566
567## ------------------------- ##
568## %prec with user strings. ##
569## ------------------------- ##
570
571AT_SETUP([%prec with user string])
572
573AT_DATA([[input.y]],
574[[%%
575exp:
576 "foo" %prec "foo"
577;
578]])
579
580AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
581AT_CLEANUP
582
583
584## -------------------------------- ##
585## %no-default-prec without %prec. ##
586## -------------------------------- ##
587
588AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec without %prec])
589
590AT_DATA([[input.y]],
591[[%left '+'
592%left '*'
593
594%%
595
596%no-default-prec;
597
598e: e '+' e
599 | e '*' e
600 | '0'
601 ;
602]])
603
604AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
605[[input.y: conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
606]])
607AT_CLEANUP
608
609
610## ----------------------------- ##
611## %no-default-prec with %prec. ##
612## ----------------------------- ##
613
614AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec with %prec])
615
616AT_DATA([[input.y]],
617[[%left '+'
618%left '*'
619
620%%
621
622%no-default-prec;
623
624e: e '+' e %prec '+'
625 | e '*' e %prec '*'
626 | '0'
627 ;
628]])
629
630AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
631AT_CLEANUP
632
633
634## --------------- ##
635## %default-prec. ##
636## --------------- ##
637
638AT_SETUP([%default-prec])
639
640AT_DATA([[input.y]],
641[[%left '+'
642%left '*'
643
644%%
645
646%default-prec;
647
648e: e '+' e
649 | e '*' e
650 | '0'
651 ;
652]])
653
654AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
655AT_CLEANUP
656
657
658## ---------------------------------------------- ##
659## Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution. ##
660## ---------------------------------------------- ##
661
662AT_SETUP([[Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution]])
663
664# If conflict resolution makes states unreachable, remove those states, report
665# rules that are then unused, and don't report conflicts in those states. Test
666# what happens when a nonterminal becomes useless as a result of state removal
667# since that causes lalr.o's goto map to be rewritten.
668
669AT_DATA([[input.y]],
670[[%output "input.c"
671%left 'a'
672
673%%
674
675start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' ;
676
677/* S/R conflict resolved as reduce, so the state with item
678 * (resolved_conflict: 'a' . unreachable1) and all it transition successors are
679 * unreachable, and the associated production is useless. */
680resolved_conflict:
681 'a' unreachable1
682 | %prec 'a'
683 ;
684
685/* S/R conflict that need not be reported since it is unreachable because of
686 * the previous conflict resolution. Nonterminal unreachable1 and all its
687 * productions are useless. */
688unreachable1:
689 'a' unreachable2
690 |
691 ;
692
693/* Likewise for a R/R conflict and nonterminal unreachable2. */
694unreachable2: | ;
695
696/* Make sure remaining S/R and R/R conflicts are still reported correctly even
697 * when their states are renumbered due to state removal. */
698reported_conflicts:
699 'a'
700 | 'a'
701 |
702 ;
703
704]])
705
706AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input.y]], 0, [],
707[[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce, 1 reduce/reduce
708input.y:12.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
709input.y:20.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
710input.y:21.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */
711input.y:25.13: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
712input.y:25.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
713input.y:31.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a'
714input.y:32.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */
715]])
716
717AT_CHECK([[cat input.output]], 0,
718[[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
719
720 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
721
722 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
723 5 | /* empty */
724
725 6 unreachable2: /* empty */
726 7 | /* empty */
727
728 9 reported_conflicts: 'a'
729 10 | /* empty */
730
731
732State 4 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
733State 5 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
734
735
736Grammar
737
738 0 $accept: start $end
739
740 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
741
742 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
743 3 | /* empty */
744
745 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
746 5 | /* empty */
747
748 6 unreachable2: /* empty */
749 7 | /* empty */
750
751 8 reported_conflicts: 'a'
752 9 | 'a'
753 10 | /* empty */
754
755
756Terminals, with rules where they appear
757
758$end (0) 0
759'a' (97) 1 2 4 8 9
760error (256)
761
762
763Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
764
765$accept (4)
766 on left: 0
767start (5)
768 on left: 1, on right: 0
769resolved_conflict (6)
770 on left: 2 3, on right: 1
771unreachable1 (7)
772 on left: 4 5, on right: 2
773unreachable2 (8)
774 on left: 6 7, on right: 4
775reported_conflicts (9)
776 on left: 8 9 10, on right: 1
777
778
779state 0
780
781 0 $accept: . start $end
782 1 start: . resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
783 2 resolved_conflict: . 'a' unreachable1
784 3 | . ['a']
785
786 $default reduce using rule 3 (resolved_conflict)
787
788 start go to state 1
789 resolved_conflict go to state 2
790
791 Conflict between rule 3 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
792
793
794state 1
795
796 0 $accept: start . $end
797
798 $end shift, and go to state 3
799
800
801state 2
802
803 1 start: resolved_conflict . 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
804
805 'a' shift, and go to state 4
806
807
808state 3
809
810 0 $accept: start $end .
811
812 $default accept
813
814
815state 4
816
817 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' . reported_conflicts 'a'
818 8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
819 9 | . 'a'
820 10 | . ['a']
821
822 'a' shift, and go to state 5
823
824 'a' [reduce using rule 10 (reported_conflicts)]
825
826 reported_conflicts go to state 6
827
828
829state 5
830
831 8 reported_conflicts: 'a' . ['a']
832 9 | 'a' . ['a']
833
834 'a' reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
835 'a' [reduce using rule 9 (reported_conflicts)]
836 $default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
837
838
839state 6
840
841 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts . 'a'
842
843 'a' shift, and go to state 7
844
845
846state 7
847
848 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' .
849
850 $default reduce using rule 1 (start)
851]])
852
853AT_DATA([[input-keep.y]],
854[[%define lr.keep-unreachable-states
855]])
856AT_CHECK([[cat input.y >> input-keep.y]])
857
858AT_BISON_CHECK([[input-keep.y]], 0, [],
859[[input-keep.y: conflicts: 2 shift/reduce, 2 reduce/reduce
860input-keep.y:22.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */
861input-keep.y:26.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
862input-keep.y:32.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a'
863input-keep.y:33.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */
864]])
865
866AT_CLEANUP
867
868
869## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
870## Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state. ##
871## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
872
873AT_SETUP([[Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state]])
874
875# Used to lose earlier solved conflict messages even within a single S/R/R.
876
877AT_DATA([[input.y]],
878[[%left 'a'
879%right 'b'
880%right 'c'
881%right 'd'
882%%
883start:
884 'a'
885 | empty_a 'a'
886 | 'b'
887 | empty_b 'b'
888 | 'c'
889 | empty_c1 'c'
890 | empty_c2 'c'
891 | empty_c3 'c'
892 ;
893empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
894empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
895empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
896empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
897empty_c3: %prec 'd' ;
898]])
899AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
900AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^state 0$/,/^state 1$/p']], 0,
901[[state 0
902
903 0 $accept: . start $end
904 1 start: . 'a'
905 2 | . empty_a 'a'
906 3 | . 'b'
907 4 | . empty_b 'b'
908 5 | . 'c'
909 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
910 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
911 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
912 9 empty_a: . ['a']
913 10 empty_b: . []
914 11 empty_c1: . []
915 12 empty_c2: . []
916 13 empty_c3: . ['c']
917
918 'b' shift, and go to state 1
919
920 'c' reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)
921 $default reduce using rule 9 (empty_a)
922
923 start go to state 2
924 empty_a go to state 3
925 empty_b go to state 4
926 empty_c1 go to state 5
927 empty_c2 go to state 6
928 empty_c3 go to state 7
929
930 Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
931 Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as shift (%right 'b').
932 Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
933 Conflict between rule 12 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
934 Conflict between rule 13 and token 'c' resolved as reduce ('c' < 'd').
935
936
937state 1
938]])
939
940AT_CLEANUP
941
942
943## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
944## %nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state. ##
945## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
946
947# Used to abort when trying to resolve conflicts as %nonassoc error actions for
948# multiple reductions in a state.
949
950# For a %nonassoc error action token, used to print the first remaining
951# reduction on that token without brackets.
952
953AT_SETUP([[%nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state]])
954
955AT_DATA([[input.y]],
956[[%nonassoc 'a' 'b' 'c'
957%%
958start:
959 'a'
960 | empty_a 'a'
961 | 'b'
962 | empty_b 'b'
963 | 'c'
964 | empty_c1 'c'
965 | empty_c2 'c'
966 | empty_c3 'c'
967 ;
968empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
969empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
970empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
971empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
972empty_c3: %prec 'c' ;
973]])
974
975AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
976AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^state 0$/,/^state 1$/p']], 0,
977[[state 0
978
979 0 $accept: . start $end
980 1 start: . 'a'
981 2 | . empty_a 'a'
982 3 | . 'b'
983 4 | . empty_b 'b'
984 5 | . 'c'
985 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
986 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
987 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
988 9 empty_a: . []
989 10 empty_b: . []
990 11 empty_c1: . []
991 12 empty_c2: . ['c']
992 13 empty_c3: . ['c']
993
994 'a' error (nonassociative)
995 'b' error (nonassociative)
996 'c' error (nonassociative)
997
998 'c' [reduce using rule 12 (empty_c2)]
999 'c' [reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)]
1000
1001 start go to state 1
1002 empty_a go to state 2
1003 empty_b go to state 3
1004 empty_c1 go to state 4
1005 empty_c2 go to state 5
1006 empty_c3 go to state 6
1007
1008 Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'a').
1009 Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'b').
1010 Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c').
1011
1012
1013state 1
1014]])
1015AT_CLEANUP