]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
1 | -*- outline -*- | |
2 | ||
3 | * Header guards | |
4 | ||
5 | From Franc,ois: should we keep the directory part in the CPP guard? | |
6 | ||
7 | ||
8 | * Yacc.c: CPP Macros | |
9 | ||
10 | Do some people use YYPURE, YYLSP_NEEDED like we do in the test suite? | |
11 | They should not: it is not documented. But if they need to, let's | |
12 | find something clean (not like YYLSP_NEEDED...). | |
13 | ||
14 | ||
15 | * URGENT: Documenting C++ output | |
16 | Write a first documentation for C++ output. | |
17 | ||
18 | ||
19 | * Documentation | |
20 | Before releasing, make sure the documentation ("Understanding your | |
21 | parser") refers to the current `output' format. | |
22 | ||
23 | ||
24 | * GLR & C++ | |
25 | Currently, the GLR parser cannot compile with a C++ compiler. | |
26 | ||
27 | ||
28 | * Report | |
29 | ||
30 | ** GLR | |
31 | How would Paul like to display the conflicted actions? In particular, | |
32 | what when two reductions are possible on a given lookahead, but one is | |
33 | part of $default. Should we make the two reductions explicit, or just | |
34 | keep $default? See the following point. | |
35 | ||
36 | ** Disabled Reductions | |
37 | See `tests/conflicts.at (Defaulted Conflicted Reduction)', and decide | |
38 | what we want to do. | |
39 | ||
40 | ** Documentation | |
41 | Extend with error productions. The hard part will probably be finding | |
42 | the right rule so that a single state does not exhibit too many yet | |
43 | undocumented ``features''. Maybe an empty action ought to be | |
44 | presented too. Shall we try to make a single grammar with all these | |
45 | features, or should we have several very small grammars? | |
46 | ||
47 | ** --report=conflict-path | |
48 | Provide better assistance for understanding the conflicts by providing | |
49 | a sample text exhibiting the (LALR) ambiguity. See the paper from | |
50 | DeRemer and Penello: they already provide the algorithm. | |
51 | ||
52 | ||
53 | * Extensions | |
54 | ||
55 | ** %destructor | |
56 | I think we should document it as experimental, and allow its use in | |
57 | the next releases. But we also need to port it to GLR. What about | |
58 | lalr1.cc? Well, read what Hans reported, maybe we don't want | |
59 | %detructor. On the other hand, there is no reason not to provide it: | |
60 | users can avoid its use. | |
61 | ||
62 | ** $foo | |
63 | Have a look at the Lemon parser generator: instead of $1, $2 etc. they | |
64 | can name the values. This is much more pleasant. For instance: | |
65 | ||
66 | exp (res): exp (a) '+' exp (b) { $res = $a + $b; }; | |
67 | ||
68 | I love this. I have been bitten too often by the removal of the | |
69 | symbol, and forgetting to shift all the $n to $n-1. If you are | |
70 | unlucky, it compiles... | |
71 | ||
72 | ** $-1 | |
73 | We should find a means to provide an access to values deep in the | |
74 | stack. For instance, instead of | |
75 | ||
76 | baz: qux { $$ = $<foo>-1 + $<bar>0 + $1; } | |
77 | ||
78 | we should be able to have: | |
79 | ||
80 | foo($foo) bar($bar) baz($bar): qux($qux) { $baz = $foo + $bar + $qux; } | |
81 | ||
82 | Or something like this. | |
83 | ||
84 | ||
85 | ** yysymprint interface | |
86 | It should be improved, in particular when using Bison features such as | |
87 | locations, and YYPARSE_PARAMS. For the time being, it is almost | |
88 | recommended to yyprint to steal internal variables... | |
89 | ||
90 | ** Several %unions | |
91 | I think this is a pleasant (but useless currently) feature, but in the | |
92 | future, I want a means to %include other bits of grammars, and _then_ | |
93 | it will be important for the various bits to define their needs in | |
94 | %union. | |
95 | ||
96 | When implementing multiple-%union support, bare the following in mind: | |
97 | ||
98 | - when --yacc, this must be flagged as an error. Don't make it fatal | |
99 | though. | |
100 | ||
101 | - The #line must now appear *inside* the definition of yystype. | |
102 | Something like | |
103 | ||
104 | { | |
105 | #line 12 "foo.y" | |
106 | int ival; | |
107 | #line 23 "foo.y" | |
108 | char *sval; | |
109 | } | |
110 | ||
111 | ** %if and the like | |
112 | It should be possible to have %if/%else/%endif. The implementation is | |
113 | not clear: should it be lexical or syntactic. Vadim Maslow thinks it | |
114 | must be in the scanner: we must not parse what is in a switched off | |
115 | part of %if. Akim Demaille thinks it should be in the parser, so as | |
116 | to avoid falling into another CPP mistake. | |
117 | ||
118 | ** -D, --define-muscle NAME=VALUE | |
119 | To define muscles via cli. Or maybe support directly NAME=VALUE? | |
120 | ||
121 | ||
122 | * Unit rules | |
123 | Maybe we could expand unit rules, i.e., transform | |
124 | ||
125 | exp: arith | bool; | |
126 | arith: exp '+' exp; | |
127 | bool: exp '&' exp; | |
128 | ||
129 | into | |
130 | ||
131 | exp: exp '+' exp | exp '&' exp; | |
132 | ||
133 | when there are no actions. This can significantly speed up some | |
134 | grammars. I can't find the papers. In particular the book `LR | |
135 | parsing: Theory and Practice' is impossible to find, but according to | |
136 | `Parsing Techniques: a Practical Guide', it includes information about | |
137 | this issue. Does anybody have it? | |
138 | ||
139 | ||
140 | ||
141 | * Documentation | |
142 | ||
143 | ** History/Bibliography | |
144 | Some history of Bison and some bibliography would be most welcome. | |
145 | Are there any Texinfo standards for bibliography? | |
146 | ||
147 | ||
148 | ||
149 | * Java, Fortran, etc. | |
150 | ||
151 | ||
152 | ** Java | |
153 | ||
154 | There are a couple of proposed outputs: | |
155 | ||
156 | - BYACC/J | |
157 | which is based on Byacc. | |
158 | <http://troi.lincom-asg.com/~rjamison/byacc/> | |
159 | ||
160 | - Bison Java | |
161 | which is based on Bison. | |
162 | <http://www.goice.co.jp/member/mo/hack-progs/bison-java.html> | |
163 | ||
164 |