]> git.saurik.com Git - bison.git/blame_incremental - doc/bison.texinfo
%printer: support both yyo and yyoutput.
[bison.git] / doc / bison.texinfo
... / ...
CommitLineData
1\input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2@comment %**start of header
3@setfilename bison.info
4@include version.texi
5@settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
6@setchapternewpage odd
7
8@finalout
9
10@c SMALL BOOK version
11@c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12@c the smallbook format.
13@c @smallbook
14
15@c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16@c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
17@c @set defaultprec
18
19@ifnotinfo
20@syncodeindex fn cp
21@syncodeindex vr cp
22@syncodeindex tp cp
23@end ifnotinfo
24@ifinfo
25@synindex fn cp
26@synindex vr cp
27@synindex tp cp
28@end ifinfo
29@comment %**end of header
30
31@copying
32
33This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34@value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
35
36Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
37Foundation, Inc.
38
39@quotation
40Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45(a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46``GNU Free Documentation License.''
47
48(a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
51freedom.''
52@end quotation
53@end copying
54
55@dircategory Software development
56@direntry
57* bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
58@end direntry
59
60@titlepage
61@title Bison
62@subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63@subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
64
65@author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
66
67@page
68@vskip 0pt plus 1filll
69@insertcopying
70@sp 2
71Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
7251 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
75ISBN 1-882114-44-2
76@sp 2
77Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
78@end titlepage
79
80@contents
81
82@ifnottex
83@node Top
84@top Bison
85@insertcopying
86@end ifnottex
87
88@menu
89* Introduction::
90* Conditions::
91* Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
93
94Tutorial sections:
95* Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96* Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
97
98Reference sections:
99* Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100* Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101* Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102* Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103* Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105* Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106* Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107* Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108* FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109* Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110* Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111* Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112* Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113* Index:: Cross-references to the text.
114
115@detailmenu
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
117
118The Concepts of Bison
119
120* Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122* Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123* Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126* Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127* GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128* Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129* Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131* Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132* Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
133
134Writing GLR Parsers
135
136* Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137* Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138* GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139* Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
140
141Examples
142
143* RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145* Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147* Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148* Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149* Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151* Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
152
153Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
154
155* Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156* Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157* Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158* Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159* Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160* Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161* Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
162
163Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
164
165* Rpcalc Input::
166* Rpcalc Line::
167* Rpcalc Expr::
168
169Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
170
171* Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172* Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173* Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
174
175Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
176
177* Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178* Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179* Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
180
181Bison Grammar Files
182
183* Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184* Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185* Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186* Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187* Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188* Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189* Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190* Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191* Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
192
193Outline of a Bison Grammar
194
195* Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196* Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197* Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198* Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199* Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
200
201Defining Language Semantics
202
203* Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204* Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205* Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206* Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207* Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
210
211Tracking Locations
212
213* Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214* Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215* Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
216
217Bison Declarations
218
219* Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220* Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221* Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222* Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223* Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224* Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225* Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226* Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
227* Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
228* Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
229* Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
230* Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
231* Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232* %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
233* %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
234
235Parser C-Language Interface
236
237* Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
238* Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
239* Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
240* Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
241* Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
242* Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
243 which reads tokens.
244* Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
245* Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
246* Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
247 native language.
248
249The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
250
251* Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
252* Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
253 of the token it has read.
254* Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
255 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
256 actions want that.
257* Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
258 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
259
260The Bison Parser Algorithm
261
262* Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
263* Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
264* Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
265* Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
266* Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
267* Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
268* Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
269* Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
270* Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
271* Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
272
273Operator Precedence
274
275* Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
276* Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
277* Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
278* How Precedence:: How they work.
279
280Tuning LR
281
282* LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
283* Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
284* LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
285* Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
286
287Handling Context Dependencies
288
289* Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
290* Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
291* Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
292 error recovery rules must be written.
293
294Debugging Your Parser
295
296* Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
297* Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
298
299Tracing Your Parser
300
301* Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
302* Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
303* The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
304
305Invoking Bison
306
307* Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
308 in alphabetical order by short options.
309* Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
310* Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
311
312Parsers Written In Other Languages
313
314* C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
315* Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
316
317C++ Parsers
318
319* C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
320* C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
321* C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
322* C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
323* C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
324* A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
325
326C++ Location Values
327
328* C++ position:: One point in the source file
329* C++ location:: Two points in the source file
330
331A Complete C++ Example
332
333* Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
334* Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
335* Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
336* Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
337* Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
338
339Java Parsers
340
341* Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
342* Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
343* Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
344* Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
345* Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
346* Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
347* Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
348* Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
349
350Frequently Asked Questions
351
352* Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
353* How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
354* Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
355* Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
356* Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
357* Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
358* I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
359* Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
360* Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
361* More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
362* Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
363* Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
364
365Copying This Manual
366
367* Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
368
369@end detailmenu
370@end menu
371
372@node Introduction
373@unnumbered Introduction
374@cindex introduction
375
376@dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
377annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
378LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
379feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
380tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
381a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
382calculators to complex programming languages.
383
384Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
385grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
386with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
387to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
388understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
389feature.
390
391We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
392using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
393last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
394chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
395of Bison in detail.
396
397Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
398it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
399added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
400Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
401to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
402@file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
403distribution.
404
405This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
406
407@node Conditions
408@unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
409
410The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
411parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
412permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
413parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
414parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
415
416The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
417compiler, have never
418had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
419software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
420policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
421License to all of the Bison source code.
422
423The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
424file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
425the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
426grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
427of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
428the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
429the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
430
431We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
432make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
433concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
434encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
435practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
436using the other GNU tools.
437
438This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
439You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
440inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
441exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
442exception.
443
444@node Copying
445@unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
446@include gpl-3.0.texi
447
448@node Concepts
449@chapter The Concepts of Bison
450
451This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
452details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
453use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
454
455@menu
456* Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
457 as mathematical ideas.
458* Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
459* Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
460 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
461 the name of an identifier, etc.).
462* Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
463* GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
464* Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
465* Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
466 how is the output used?
467* Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
468* Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
469@end menu
470
471@node Language and Grammar
472@section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
473
474@cindex context-free grammar
475@cindex grammar, context-free
476In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
477@dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
478@dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
479parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
480`expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
481can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
482``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
483recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
484recursion.
485
486@cindex BNF
487@cindex Backus-Naur form
488The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
489is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
490order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
491BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
492essentially machine-readable BNF.
493
494@cindex LALR grammars
495@cindex IELR grammars
496@cindex LR grammars
497There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
498it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
499are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
500to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
501of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
502additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
503@xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
504experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
505requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
506Construction}, to learn how.
507
508@cindex GLR parsing
509@cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
510@cindex ambiguous grammars
511@cindex nondeterministic parsing
512
513Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
514roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
515uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
516(called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
517grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
518apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
519grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
520lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
521With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
522general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
523parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
524are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
525possible parses of any given string is finite.
526
527@cindex symbols (abstract)
528@cindex token
529@cindex syntactic grouping
530@cindex grouping, syntactic
531In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
532unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
533grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
534@dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
535@dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
536corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
537corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
538
539We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
540nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
541and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
542punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
543`identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
544operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
545`char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
546(These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
547lexicography, not grammar.)
548
549Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
550
551@example
552int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
553square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
554 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
555@{ /* @r{open-brace} */
556 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
557 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
558@} /* @r{close-brace} */
559@end example
560
561The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
562declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
563grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
564`declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
565additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
566order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
567function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
568the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
569
570Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
571out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
572@code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
573reads informally as follows:
574
575@quotation
576A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
577`semicolon'.
578@end quotation
579
580@noindent
581There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
582statement in C.
583
584@cindex start symbol
585One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
586defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
587symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
588language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
589plays this role.
590
591For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
592program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
593context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
594not the start symbol.
595
596The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
597tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
598that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
599the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
600must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
601reports a syntax error.
602
603@node Grammar in Bison
604@section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
605@cindex Bison grammar
606@cindex grammar, Bison
607@cindex formal grammar
608
609A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
610for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
611a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
612
613A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
614as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
615in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
616
617The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
618type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
619convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
620nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
621@code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
622the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
623The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
624@xref{Symbols}.
625
626A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
627a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
628single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
629a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
630
631A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
632containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
633
634The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
635here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
636quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
637the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
638used in every rule.
639
640@example
641stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
642@end example
643
644@noindent
645@xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
646
647@node Semantic Values
648@section Semantic Values
649@cindex semantic value
650@cindex value, semantic
651
652A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
653if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
654@emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
655precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
656@samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
657grammatical.
658
659But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
660parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
6613989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
662has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
663,Defining Language Semantics},
664for details.
665
666The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
667@code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
668you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
669group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
670except their types.
671
672The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
673meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
674identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
675need to have any semantic value.)
676
677For example, an input token might be classified as token type
678@code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
679have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
680rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
681acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
682token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
683
684Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
685symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
686semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
687language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
688structure describing the meaning of the expression.
689
690@node Semantic Actions
691@section Semantic Actions
692@cindex semantic actions
693@cindex actions, semantic
694
695In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
696also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
697rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
698parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
699@xref{Actions}.
700
701Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
702of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
703suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
704expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
705subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
706The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
707newly recognized larger expression.
708
709For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
710two subexpressions:
711
712@example
713expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
714@end example
715
716@noindent
717The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
718from the values of the two subexpressions.
719
720@node GLR Parsers
721@section Writing GLR Parsers
722@cindex GLR parsing
723@cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
724@findex %glr-parser
725@cindex conflicts
726@cindex shift/reduce conflicts
727@cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
728
729In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
730LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
731certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
732decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
733reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
734a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
735input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
736(@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
737(@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
738
739To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
740more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
741@code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
742(@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
743(GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
744contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
745declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
746faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
747GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
748effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
749the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
750can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
751proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
752symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
753parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
754a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
755another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
756identical set of symbols.
757
758During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
759recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
760semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
761reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
762records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
763merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
764outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
765involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
766user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
767merged result.
768
769@menu
770* Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
771* Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
772* GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
773* Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
774@end menu
775
776@node Simple GLR Parsers
777@subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
778@cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
779@cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
780@findex %glr-parser
781@findex %expect-rr
782@cindex conflicts
783@cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
784@cindex shift/reduce conflicts
785
786In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
787to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
788Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
789
790Consider a problem that
791arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
792programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
793
794@example
795type subrange = lo .. hi;
796type enum = (a, b, c);
797@end example
798
799@noindent
800The original language standard allows only numeric
801literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
802and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
80310206) and many other
804Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
805rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
806parentheses:
807
808@example
809type subrange = (a) .. b;
810@end example
811
812@noindent
813Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
814type with only one value:
815
816@example
817type enum = (a);
818@end example
819
820@noindent
821(These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
822valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
823
824These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
825With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
826possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
827@samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
828for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
829@samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
830value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
831current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
832
833You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
834to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
835contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
836grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
837expressions.
838
839You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
840forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
841undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
842scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
843are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
844value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
845work.
846
847A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
848use the GLR algorithm.
849When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
850merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
851simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
852error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
853@samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
854accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
855fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
856fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
857all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
858
859If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
860reports a syntax error as usual.
861
862The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
863correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
864lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
865for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
866that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
867
868In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
869and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
870for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
871grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
872The present example contains only one conflict between two
873rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
874cannot be nested. So the number of
875branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
876and the parsing time is still linear.
877
878Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
879parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
880
881@example
882%token TYPE DOTDOT ID
883
884@group
885%left '+' '-'
886%left '*' '/'
887@end group
888
889%%
890
891@group
892type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
893@end group
894
895@group
896type:
897 '(' id_list ')'
898| expr DOTDOT expr
899;
900@end group
901
902@group
903id_list:
904 ID
905| id_list ',' ID
906;
907@end group
908
909@group
910expr:
911 '(' expr ')'
912| expr '+' expr
913| expr '-' expr
914| expr '*' expr
915| expr '/' expr
916| ID
917;
918@end group
919@end example
920
921When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
922about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
923parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
924declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
925recognized:
926
927@example
928type t = (a) .. b;
929@end example
930
931The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
932to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
933these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
934@samp{%%}):
935
936@example
937%glr-parser
938%expect-rr 1
939@end example
940
941@noindent
942No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
943parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
944limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
945notice when the parser splits.
946
947So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
948almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
949there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
950analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
951splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
952splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
953LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
954conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
955Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
956performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
957information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
958eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
959lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
960correctness.
961
962In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
963their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
964defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
965a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
966the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
967they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
968
969@node Merging GLR Parses
970@subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
971@cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
972@cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
973@findex %dprec
974@findex %merge
975@cindex conflicts
976@cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
977
978Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
979
980@example
981%@{
982 #include <stdio.h>
983 #define YYSTYPE char const *
984 int yylex (void);
985 void yyerror (char const *);
986%@}
987
988%token TYPENAME ID
989
990%right '='
991%left '+'
992
993%glr-parser
994
995%%
996
997prog:
998 /* Nothing. */
999| prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1000;
1001
1002stmt:
1003 expr ';' %dprec 1
1004| decl %dprec 2
1005;
1006
1007expr:
1008 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1009| TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1010 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1011| expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1012| expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1013;
1014
1015decl:
1016 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1017 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1018| TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1019 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1020;
1021
1022declarator:
1023 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1024| '(' declarator ')'
1025;
1026@end example
1027
1028@noindent
1029This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1030certain declarations and statements. For example,
1031
1032@example
1033T (x) = y+z;
1034@end example
1035
1036@noindent
1037parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1038(assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1039@samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1040Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1041@code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1042time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1043GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1044each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1045Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1046however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1047ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1048the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1049identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1050input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1051
1052At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1053grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1054In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1055declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1056to the parse that interprets the example as a
1057@code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1058The parser therefore prints
1059
1060@example
1061"x" y z + T <init-declare>
1062@end example
1063
1064The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1065parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1066
1067@example
1068T (x) + y;
1069@end example
1070
1071@noindent
1072This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1073construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1074Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1075However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1076have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1077between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1078case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1079into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1080assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1081then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1082
1083@example
1084x T <cast> y +
1085@end example
1086
1087Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1088the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1089actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1090other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1091follows:
1092
1093@example
1094stmt:
1095 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1096| decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1097;
1098@end example
1099
1100@noindent
1101and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1102
1103@example
1104static YYSTYPE
1105stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1106@{
1107 printf ("<OR> ");
1108 return "";
1109@}
1110@end example
1111
1112@noindent
1113with an accompanying forward declaration
1114in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1115
1116@example
1117%@{
1118 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1119 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1120%@}
1121@end example
1122
1123@noindent
1124With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1125as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1126
1127@example
1128"x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1129@end example
1130
1131Bison requires that all of the
1132productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1133@samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1134and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1135the offending merge.
1136
1137@node GLR Semantic Actions
1138@subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1139
1140@cindex deferred semantic actions
1141By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1142the associated reduction.
1143This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1144action in a GLR parser.
1145
1146@vindex yychar
1147@cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1148@vindex yylval
1149@cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1150@vindex yylloc
1151@cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1152In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1153the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1154After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1155you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1156lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1157In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1158influence syntax analysis.
1159@xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1160
1161@findex yyclearin
1162@cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1163In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1164In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1165shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1166For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1167Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1168future versions of Bison.
1169For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1170to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1171memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1172
1173@findex YYERROR
1174@cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1175Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1176(@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1177initiate error recovery.
1178During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1179the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1180In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1181@c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1182
1183Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1184describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1185
1186@node Compiler Requirements
1187@subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1188@cindex @code{inline}
1189@cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1190
1191The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1192later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1193C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1194up to the user of these parsers to handle
1195portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1196macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1197
1198@example
1199%@{
1200 #include <config.h>
1201%@}
1202@end example
1203
1204@noindent
1205will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1206
1207@example
1208%@{
1209 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1210 && ! defined inline)
1211 # define inline
1212 #endif
1213%@}
1214@end example
1215
1216@node Locations
1217@section Locations
1218@cindex location
1219@cindex textual location
1220@cindex location, textual
1221
1222Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1223and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1224the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1225Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1226
1227Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1228associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1229and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1230structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1231details).
1232
1233Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1234set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1235is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1236@code{@@3}.
1237
1238When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1239of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1240action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1241enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1242rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1243grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1244of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1245
1246@node Bison Parser
1247@section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1248@cindex Bison parser
1249@cindex Bison utility
1250@cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1251@cindex parser
1252
1253When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1254most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1255the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1256@dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1257implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1258Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1259whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1260of your program.
1261
1262The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1263the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1264expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1265uses.
1266
1267The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1268you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1269parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1270doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1271may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1272parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1273@xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1274
1275The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1276function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1277function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1278additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1279error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1280In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1281@code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1282@code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1283C-Language Interface}.
1284
1285Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1286write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1287itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1288functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1289error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1290@code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1291for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1292identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1293file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1294avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1295anything other than their usual meanings.
1296
1297In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1298headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1299reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1300@code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1301included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1302@code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1303(@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1304if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1305,Tracing Your Parser}).
1306
1307@node Stages
1308@section Stages in Using Bison
1309@cindex stages in using Bison
1310@cindex using Bison
1311
1312The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1313to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1314
1315@enumerate
1316@item
1317Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1318(@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1319in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1320instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1321sequence of C statements.
1322
1323@item
1324Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1325The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1326Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1327using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1328
1329@item
1330Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1331
1332@item
1333Write error-reporting routines.
1334@end enumerate
1335
1336To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1337must follow these steps:
1338
1339@enumerate
1340@item
1341Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1342
1343@item
1344Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1345
1346@item
1347Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1348@end enumerate
1349
1350@node Grammar Layout
1351@section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1352@cindex grammar file
1353@cindex file format
1354@cindex format of grammar file
1355@cindex layout of Bison grammar
1356
1357The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1358general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1359
1360@example
1361%@{
1362@var{Prologue}
1363%@}
1364
1365@var{Bison declarations}
1366
1367%%
1368@var{Grammar rules}
1369%%
1370@var{Epilogue}
1371@end example
1372
1373@noindent
1374The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1375in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1376
1377The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1378also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1379@code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1380You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1381printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1382used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1383
1384The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1385symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1386semantic values of various symbols.
1387
1388The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1389parts.
1390
1391The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1392definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1393simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1394
1395@node Examples
1396@chapter Examples
1397@cindex simple examples
1398@cindex examples, simple
1399
1400Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1401reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1402calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1403and a multi-function calculator. All
1404produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1405
1406These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1407languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1408source file to try them.
1409
1410@menu
1411* RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1412 a first example with no operator precedence.
1413* Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1414 Operator precedence is introduced.
1415* Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1416* Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1417* Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1418 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1419* Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1420@end menu
1421
1422@node RPN Calc
1423@section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1424@cindex reverse polish notation
1425@cindex polish notation calculator
1426@cindex @code{rpcalc}
1427@cindex calculator, simple
1428
1429The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1430notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1431provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1432The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1433
1434The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1435@samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1436
1437@menu
1438* Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1439* Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1440* Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1441* Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1442* Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1443* Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1444* Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1445@end menu
1446
1447@node Rpcalc Declarations
1448@subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1449
1450Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1451calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1452
1453@example
1454/* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1455
1456%@{
1457 #define YYSTYPE double
1458 #include <math.h>
1459 int yylex (void);
1460 void yyerror (char const *);
1461%@}
1462
1463%token NUM
1464
1465%% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1466@end example
1467
1468The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1469preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1470
1471The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1472specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1473groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1474Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1475don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1476@code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1477which is a floating point number.
1478
1479The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1480function @code{pow}.
1481
1482The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1483needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1484before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1485epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1486prologue.
1487
1488The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1489about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1490Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1491single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1492literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1493arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1494only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1495type for numeric constants.
1496
1497@node Rpcalc Rules
1498@subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1499
1500Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1501
1502@example
1503@group
1504input:
1505 /* empty */
1506| input line
1507;
1508@end group
1509
1510@group
1511line:
1512 '\n'
1513| exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1514;
1515@end group
1516
1517@group
1518exp:
1519 NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1520| exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1521| exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1522| exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1523| exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1524| exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1525| exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1526;
1527@end group
1528%%
1529@end example
1530
1531The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1532(given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1533complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1534symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1535which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1536mean.
1537
1538The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1539grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1540braces. @xref{Actions}.
1541
1542You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1543passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1544pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1545that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1546main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1547rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1548
1549@menu
1550* Rpcalc Input::
1551* Rpcalc Line::
1552* Rpcalc Expr::
1553@end menu
1554
1555@node Rpcalc Input
1556@subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1557
1558Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1559
1560@example
1561input:
1562 /* empty */
1563| input line
1564;
1565@end example
1566
1567This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1568string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1569``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1570to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1571leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1572
1573The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1574colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1575empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1576is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1577It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1578@samp{/* empty */} in it.
1579
1580The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1581It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1582possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1583first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1584more times.
1585
1586The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1587grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1588input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1589
1590@node Rpcalc Line
1591@subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1592
1593Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1594
1595@example
1596line:
1597 '\n'
1598| exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1599;
1600@end example
1601
1602The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1603that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1604action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1605This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1606the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1607question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1608value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1609
1610This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1611a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1612uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1613that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1614value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1615
1616@node Rpcalc Expr
1617@subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1618
1619The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1620The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1621The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1622followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1623
1624@example
1625exp:
1626 NUM
1627| exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1628| exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1629@dots{}
1630;
1631@end example
1632
1633We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1634equally well have written them separately:
1635
1636@example
1637exp: NUM ;
1638exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1639exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1640@dots{}
1641@end example
1642
1643Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1644terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1645@code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1646the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1647associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1648@code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1649rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1650the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1651
1652You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1653action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1654This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1655
1656The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1657not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1658For example, this:
1659
1660@example
1661exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1662@end example
1663
1664@noindent
1665means the same thing as this:
1666
1667@example
1668exp:
1669 NUM
1670| exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1671| @dots{}
1672;
1673@end example
1674
1675@noindent
1676The latter, however, is much more readable.
1677
1678@node Rpcalc Lexer
1679@subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1680@cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1681@cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1682
1683The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1684or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1685tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1686Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1687
1688Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1689calculator. This
1690lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1691@code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1692that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1693for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1694
1695The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1696represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1697this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1698This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1699numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1700character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1701token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1702macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1703therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1704
1705The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1706global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1707for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1708defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1709,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1710
1711A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1712(Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1713
1714Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1715
1716@example
1717@group
1718/* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1719 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1720 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1721 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1722
1723#include <ctype.h>
1724@end group
1725
1726@group
1727int
1728yylex (void)
1729@{
1730 int c;
1731
1732 /* Skip white space. */
1733 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1734 continue;
1735@end group
1736@group
1737 /* Process numbers. */
1738 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1739 @{
1740 ungetc (c, stdin);
1741 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1742 return NUM;
1743 @}
1744@end group
1745@group
1746 /* Return end-of-input. */
1747 if (c == EOF)
1748 return 0;
1749 /* Return a single char. */
1750 return c;
1751@}
1752@end group
1753@end example
1754
1755@node Rpcalc Main
1756@subsection The Controlling Function
1757@cindex controlling function
1758@cindex main function in simple example
1759
1760In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1761kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1762@code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1763
1764@example
1765@group
1766int
1767main (void)
1768@{
1769 return yyparse ();
1770@}
1771@end group
1772@end example
1773
1774@node Rpcalc Error
1775@subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1776@cindex error reporting routine
1777
1778When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1779function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1780always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1781@code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1782here is the definition we will use:
1783
1784@example
1785@group
1786#include <stdio.h>
1787@end group
1788
1789@group
1790/* Called by yyparse on error. */
1791void
1792yyerror (char const *s)
1793@{
1794 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1795@}
1796@end group
1797@end example
1798
1799After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1800and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1801(@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1802have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1803cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1804real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1805
1806@node Rpcalc Generate
1807@subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1808@cindex running Bison (introduction)
1809
1810Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1811arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1812simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1813the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1814@code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1815(@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1816
1817For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1818@code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1819
1820With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1821to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1822
1823@example
1824bison @var{file}.y
1825@end example
1826
1827@noindent
1828In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1829``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1830implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1831@samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1832contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1833in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1834copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1835
1836@node Rpcalc Compile
1837@subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1838@cindex compiling the parser
1839
1840Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1841
1842@example
1843@group
1844# @r{List files in current directory.}
1845$ @kbd{ls}
1846rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1847@end group
1848
1849@group
1850# @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1851# @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1852$ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1853@end group
1854
1855@group
1856# @r{List files again.}
1857$ @kbd{ls}
1858rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1859@end group
1860@end example
1861
1862The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1863example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1864
1865@example
1866$ @kbd{rpcalc}
1867@kbd{4 9 +}
186813
1869@kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1870-13
1871@kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
187213
1873@kbd{5 6 / 4 n +}
1874-3.166666667
1875@kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
187681
1877@kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1878$
1879@end example
1880
1881@node Infix Calc
1882@section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1883@cindex infix notation calculator
1884@cindex @code{calc}
1885@cindex calculator, infix notation
1886
1887We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1888notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1889parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1890@file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1891
1892@example
1893/* Infix notation calculator. */
1894
1895@group
1896%@{
1897 #define YYSTYPE double
1898 #include <math.h>
1899 #include <stdio.h>
1900 int yylex (void);
1901 void yyerror (char const *);
1902%@}
1903@end group
1904
1905@group
1906/* Bison declarations. */
1907%token NUM
1908%left '-' '+'
1909%left '*' '/'
1910%left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1911%right '^' /* exponentiation */
1912@end group
1913
1914%% /* The grammar follows. */
1915@group
1916input:
1917 /* empty */
1918| input line
1919;
1920@end group
1921
1922@group
1923line:
1924 '\n'
1925| exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1926;
1927@end group
1928
1929@group
1930exp:
1931 NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1932| exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1933| exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1934| exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1935| exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1936| '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1937| exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1938| '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1939;
1940@end group
1941%%
1942@end example
1943
1944@noindent
1945The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1946same as before.
1947
1948There are two important new features shown in this code.
1949
1950In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1951types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1952@code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1953@code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1954associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1955ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1956the associativity.)
1957
1958Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1959declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1960the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1961has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1962by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1963Precedence}.
1964
1965The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1966section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1967Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1968@code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1969Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1970
1971Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1972
1973@need 500
1974@example
1975$ @kbd{calc}
1976@kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
19776.880952381
1978@kbd{-56 + 2}
1979-54
1980@kbd{3 ^ 2}
19819
1982@end example
1983
1984@node Simple Error Recovery
1985@section Simple Error Recovery
1986@cindex error recovery, simple
1987
1988Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1989recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1990error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1991Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1992@code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1993calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1994
1995The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1996may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1997been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1998
1999@example
2000@group
2001line:
2002 '\n'
2003| exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2004| error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2005;
2006@end group
2007@end example
2008
2009This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2010event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2011read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2012and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2013upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2014@code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2015that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2016difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2017misprint.
2018
2019This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2020kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2021signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2022signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2023input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2024input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2025Bison programs.
2026
2027@node Location Tracking Calc
2028@section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2029@cindex location tracking calculator
2030@cindex @code{ltcalc}
2031@cindex calculator, location tracking
2032
2033This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2034tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2035the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2036most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2037analyzer.
2038
2039@menu
2040* Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2041* Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2042* Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2043@end menu
2044
2045@node Ltcalc Declarations
2046@subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2047
2048The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2049the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2050
2051@example
2052/* Location tracking calculator. */
2053
2054%@{
2055 #define YYSTYPE int
2056 #include <math.h>
2057 int yylex (void);
2058 void yyerror (char const *);
2059%@}
2060
2061/* Bison declarations. */
2062%token NUM
2063
2064%left '-' '+'
2065%left '*' '/'
2066%left NEG
2067%right '^'
2068
2069%% /* The grammar follows. */
2070@end example
2071
2072@noindent
2073Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2074type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2075by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2076four member structure with the following integer fields:
2077@code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2078@code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2079Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2080start at 1.
2081
2082@node Ltcalc Rules
2083@subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2084
2085Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2086language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2087to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2088from the new information.
2089
2090Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2091wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2092
2093@example
2094@group
2095input:
2096 /* empty */
2097| input line
2098;
2099@end group
2100
2101@group
2102line:
2103 '\n'
2104| exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2105;
2106@end group
2107
2108@group
2109exp:
2110 NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2111| exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2112| exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2113| exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2114@end group
2115@group
2116| exp '/' exp
2117 @{
2118 if ($3)
2119 $$ = $1 / $3;
2120 else
2121 @{
2122 $$ = 1;
2123 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2124 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2125 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2126 @}
2127 @}
2128@end group
2129@group
2130| '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2131| exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2132| '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2133@end group
2134@end example
2135
2136This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2137using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2138pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2139
2140We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2141automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2142@code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2143of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2144can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2145Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2146hand.
2147
2148@node Ltcalc Lexer
2149@subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2150
2151Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2152tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2153able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2154semantic values.
2155
2156To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2157input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2158
2159@example
2160@group
2161int
2162yylex (void)
2163@{
2164 int c;
2165@end group
2166
2167@group
2168 /* Skip white space. */
2169 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2170 ++yylloc.last_column;
2171@end group
2172
2173@group
2174 /* Step. */
2175 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2176 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2177@end group
2178
2179@group
2180 /* Process numbers. */
2181 if (isdigit (c))
2182 @{
2183 yylval = c - '0';
2184 ++yylloc.last_column;
2185 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2186 @{
2187 ++yylloc.last_column;
2188 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2189 @}
2190 ungetc (c, stdin);
2191 return NUM;
2192 @}
2193@end group
2194
2195 /* Return end-of-input. */
2196 if (c == EOF)
2197 return 0;
2198
2199@group
2200 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2201 if (c == '\n')
2202 @{
2203 ++yylloc.last_line;
2204 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2205 @}
2206 else
2207 ++yylloc.last_column;
2208 return c;
2209@}
2210@end group
2211@end example
2212
2213Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2214it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2215In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2216@code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2217
2218Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2219as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2220needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2221controlling function:
2222
2223@example
2224@group
2225int
2226main (void)
2227@{
2228 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2229 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2230 return yyparse ();
2231@}
2232@end group
2233@end example
2234
2235Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2236character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2237valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2238
2239@node Multi-function Calc
2240@section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2241@cindex multi-function calculator
2242@cindex @code{mfcalc}
2243@cindex calculator, multi-function
2244
2245Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2246a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2247functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2248be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2249as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2250
2251It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2252only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2253back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2254adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2255functions whose syntax has this form:
2256
2257@example
2258@var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2259@end example
2260
2261@noindent
2262At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2263to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2264Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2265
2266@example
2267$ @kbd{mfcalc}
2268@kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
22693.1415926536
2270@kbd{sin(pi)}
22710.0000000000
2272@kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
22732.3000000000
2274@kbd{alpha}
22752.3000000000
2276@kbd{ln(alpha)}
22770.8329091229
2278@kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
22792.3000000000
2280$
2281@end example
2282
2283Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2284
2285@menu
2286* Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2287* Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2288* Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2289@end menu
2290
2291@node Mfcalc Declarations
2292@subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2293
2294Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2295
2296@comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2297@example
2298@group
2299%@{
2300 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2301 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2302 int yylex (void);
2303 void yyerror (char const *);
2304%@}
2305@end group
2306
2307@group
2308%union @{
2309 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2310 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2311@}
2312@end group
2313%token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2314%token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2315%type <val> exp
2316
2317@group
2318%right '='
2319%left '-' '+'
2320%left '*' '/'
2321%left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2322%right '^' /* exponentiation */
2323@end group
2324@end example
2325
2326The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2327These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2328(@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2329
2330The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2331this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2332double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2333the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2334
2335Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2336type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2337are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2338declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2339between angle brackets).
2340
2341The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2342symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2343have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2344normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2345@code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2346@xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2347
2348@node Mfcalc Rules
2349@subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2350
2351Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2352Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2353those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2354
2355@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2356@example
2357%% /* The grammar follows. */
2358@group
2359input:
2360 /* empty */
2361| input line
2362;
2363@end group
2364
2365@group
2366line:
2367 '\n'
2368| exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2369| error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2370;
2371@end group
2372
2373@group
2374exp:
2375 NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2376| VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2377| VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2378| FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2379| exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2380| exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2381| exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2382| exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2383| '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2384| exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2385| '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2386;
2387@end group
2388/* End of grammar. */
2389%%
2390@end example
2391
2392@node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2393@subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2394@cindex symbol table example
2395
2396The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2397names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2398grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2399requires some additional C functions for support.
2400
2401The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2402definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2403provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2404
2405@comment file: calc.h
2406@example
2407@group
2408/* Function type. */
2409typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2410@end group
2411
2412@group
2413/* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2414struct symrec
2415@{
2416 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2417 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2418 union
2419 @{
2420 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2421 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2422 @} value;
2423 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2424@};
2425@end group
2426
2427@group
2428typedef struct symrec symrec;
2429
2430/* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2431extern symrec *sym_table;
2432
2433symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2434symrec *getsym (char const *);
2435@end group
2436@end example
2437
2438The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2439function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2440@code{init_table} as well:
2441
2442@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2443@example
2444#include <stdio.h>
2445
2446@group
2447/* Called by yyparse on error. */
2448void
2449yyerror (char const *s)
2450@{
2451 printf ("%s\n", s);
2452@}
2453@end group
2454
2455@group
2456struct init
2457@{
2458 char const *fname;
2459 double (*fnct) (double);
2460@};
2461@end group
2462
2463@group
2464struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2465@{
2466 "sin", sin,
2467 "cos", cos,
2468 "atan", atan,
2469 "ln", log,
2470 "exp", exp,
2471 "sqrt", sqrt,
2472 0, 0
2473@};
2474@end group
2475
2476@group
2477/* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2478symrec *sym_table;
2479@end group
2480
2481@group
2482/* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2483void
2484init_table (void)
2485@{
2486 int i;
2487 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2488 @{
2489 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2490 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2491 @}
2492@}
2493@end group
2494
2495@group
2496int
2497main (void)
2498@{
2499 init_table ();
2500 return yyparse ();
2501@}
2502@end group
2503@end example
2504
2505By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2506files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2507
2508Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2509symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2510(@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2511linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2512The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2513found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2514
2515@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2516@example
2517#include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2518#include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2519
2520@group
2521symrec *
2522putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2523@{
2524 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2525 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2526 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2527 ptr->type = sym_type;
2528 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2529 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2530 sym_table = ptr;
2531 return ptr;
2532@}
2533@end group
2534
2535@group
2536symrec *
2537getsym (char const *sym_name)
2538@{
2539 symrec *ptr;
2540 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2541 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2542 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2543 return ptr;
2544 return 0;
2545@}
2546@end group
2547@end example
2548
2549The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2550the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2551characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2552functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2553
2554The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2555the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2556(@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2557already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2558@code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2559returned to @code{yyparse}.
2560
2561No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2562operators in @code{yylex}.
2563
2564@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2565@example
2566@group
2567#include <ctype.h>
2568@end group
2569
2570@group
2571int
2572yylex (void)
2573@{
2574 int c;
2575
2576 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2577 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2578 continue;
2579
2580 if (c == EOF)
2581 return 0;
2582@end group
2583
2584@group
2585 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2586 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2587 @{
2588 ungetc (c, stdin);
2589 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2590 return NUM;
2591 @}
2592@end group
2593
2594@group
2595 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2596 if (isalpha (c))
2597 @{
2598 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2599 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2600 static size_t length = 40;
2601 static char *symbuf = 0;
2602 symrec *s;
2603 int i;
2604@end group
2605
2606 if (!symbuf)
2607 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2608
2609 i = 0;
2610 do
2611@group
2612 @{
2613 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2614 if (i == length)
2615 @{
2616 length *= 2;
2617 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2618 @}
2619 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2620 symbuf[i++] = c;
2621 /* Get another character. */
2622 c = getchar ();
2623 @}
2624@end group
2625@group
2626 while (isalnum (c));
2627
2628 ungetc (c, stdin);
2629 symbuf[i] = '\0';
2630@end group
2631
2632@group
2633 s = getsym (symbuf);
2634 if (s == 0)
2635 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2636 yylval.tptr = s;
2637 return s->type;
2638 @}
2639
2640 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2641 return c;
2642@}
2643@end group
2644@end example
2645
2646The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2647@code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2648on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2649
2650@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2651@example
2652@group
2653/* Called by yyparse on error. */
2654void
2655yyerror (char const *s)
2656@{
2657 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2658@}
2659@end group
2660
2661@group
2662int
2663main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2664@{
2665 int i;
2666 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2667 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2668 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2669 yydebug = 1;
2670 init_table ();
2671 return yyparse ();
2672@}
2673@end group
2674@end example
2675
2676This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2677functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2678predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2679
2680@node Exercises
2681@section Exercises
2682@cindex exercises
2683
2684@enumerate
2685@item
2686Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2687
2688@item
2689Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2690modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2691It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2692
2693@item
2694Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2695uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2696@end enumerate
2697
2698@node Grammar File
2699@chapter Bison Grammar Files
2700
2701Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2702C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2703
2704The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2705@xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2706
2707@menu
2708* Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2709* Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2710* Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2711* Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2712* Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2713* Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2714* Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2715* Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2716* Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2717@end menu
2718
2719@node Grammar Outline
2720@section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2721
2722A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2723appropriate delimiters:
2724
2725@example
2726%@{
2727 @var{Prologue}
2728%@}
2729
2730@var{Bison declarations}
2731
2732%%
2733@var{Grammar rules}
2734%%
2735
2736@var{Epilogue}
2737@end example
2738
2739Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2740As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2741continues until end of line.
2742
2743@menu
2744* Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2745* Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2746* Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2747* Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2748* Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2749@end menu
2750
2751@node Prologue
2752@subsection The prologue
2753@cindex declarations section
2754@cindex Prologue
2755@cindex declarations
2756
2757The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2758of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2759rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2760file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2761use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2762you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2763@samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2764
2765The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2766of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2767character constant.
2768
2769You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2770@var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2771declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2772declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2773prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2774can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2775@code{%union} declaration.
2776
2777@example
2778%@{
2779 #define _GNU_SOURCE
2780 #include <stdio.h>
2781 #include "ptypes.h"
2782%@}
2783
2784%union @{
2785 long int n;
2786 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2787@}
2788
2789%@{
2790 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2791 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2792%@}
2793
2794@dots{}
2795@end example
2796
2797When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2798Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2799of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2800@code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2801feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2802@code{#include} directives.
2803
2804@node Prologue Alternatives
2805@subsection Prologue Alternatives
2806@cindex Prologue Alternatives
2807
2808@findex %code
2809@findex %code requires
2810@findex %code provides
2811@findex %code top
2812
2813The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2814inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2815directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2816purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2817generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2818location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2819@code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2820
2821Look again at the example of the previous section:
2822
2823@example
2824%@{
2825 #define _GNU_SOURCE
2826 #include <stdio.h>
2827 #include "ptypes.h"
2828%@}
2829
2830%union @{
2831 long int n;
2832 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2833@}
2834
2835%@{
2836 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2837 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2838%@}
2839
2840@dots{}
2841@end example
2842
2843@noindent
2844Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2845subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2846decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2847which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2848You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2849into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2850@code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2851prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2852@code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2853prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2854@emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2855
2856This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2857established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2858This behavior raises a few questions.
2859First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2860@code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2861Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2862In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2863This behavior is not intuitive.
2864
2865To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2866@code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2867Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2868@code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2869
2870@example
2871%code top @{
2872 #define _GNU_SOURCE
2873 #include <stdio.h>
2874
2875 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2876 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2877
2878 #include "ptypes.h"
2879 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2880 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2881 @{
2882 int first_line;
2883 int first_column;
2884 int last_line;
2885 int last_column;
2886 char *filename;
2887 @} YYLTYPE;
2888@}
2889
2890%union @{
2891 long int n;
2892 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2893@}
2894
2895%code @{
2896 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2897 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2898 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2899@}
2900
2901@dots{}
2902@end example
2903
2904@noindent
2905In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2906functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2907explicit which kind you intend.
2908Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2909
2910The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2911first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2912parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2913required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2914implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2915a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2916want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2917header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2918in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2919definition there.
2920
2921In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2922lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2923definitions.
2924Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2925
2926@example
2927@group
2928%code top @{
2929 #define _GNU_SOURCE
2930 #include <stdio.h>
2931@}
2932@end group
2933
2934@group
2935%code requires @{
2936 #include "ptypes.h"
2937@}
2938@end group
2939@group
2940%union @{
2941 long int n;
2942 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2943@}
2944@end group
2945
2946@group
2947%code requires @{
2948 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2949 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2950 @{
2951 int first_line;
2952 int first_column;
2953 int last_line;
2954 int last_column;
2955 char *filename;
2956 @} YYLTYPE;
2957@}
2958@end group
2959
2960@group
2961%code @{
2962 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2963 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2964 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2965@}
2966@end group
2967
2968@dots{}
2969@end example
2970
2971@noindent
2972Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2973@code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2974and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2975and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2976requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2977definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2978
2979When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2980@code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2981@code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2982a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2983to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2984special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2985unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2986make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2987other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2988practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2989requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2990alternatives.
2991
2992At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2993provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2994parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2995both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2996this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2997@code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2998@code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2999@code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3000sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3001@code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3002
3003@example
3004@group
3005%code top @{
3006 #define _GNU_SOURCE
3007 #include <stdio.h>
3008@}
3009@end group
3010
3011@group
3012%code requires @{
3013 #include "ptypes.h"
3014@}
3015@end group
3016@group
3017%union @{
3018 long int n;
3019 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3020@}
3021@end group
3022
3023@group
3024%code requires @{
3025 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3026 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3027 @{
3028 int first_line;
3029 int first_column;
3030 int last_line;
3031 int last_column;
3032 char *filename;
3033 @} YYLTYPE;
3034@}
3035@end group
3036
3037@group
3038%code provides @{
3039 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3040@}
3041@end group
3042
3043@group
3044%code @{
3045 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3046 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3047@}
3048@end group
3049
3050@dots{}
3051@end example
3052
3053@noindent
3054Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3055parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3056definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3057@code{YYSTYPE}.
3058
3059The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3060reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3061files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3062and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3063easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3064it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3065to you.
3066
3067You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3068In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3069This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3070the grammar file affects its functionality.
3071
3072The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3073organize your grammar file.
3074For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3075type:
3076
3077@example
3078@group
3079%code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3080%union @{ type1 field1; @}
3081%destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3082%printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3083@end group
3084
3085@group
3086%code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3087%union @{ type2 field2; @}
3088%destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3089%printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3090@end group
3091@end example
3092
3093@noindent
3094You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3095the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3096type.
3097(In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3098semicolon.)
3099And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3100definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3101counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3102Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3103
3104This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3105@var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3106However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3107think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3108Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3109code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3110@code{%code} is the most generic label.
3111Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3112as needed.
3113
3114@node Bison Declarations
3115@subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3116@cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3117@cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3118
3119The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3120terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3121In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3122@xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3123
3124@node Grammar Rules
3125@subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3126@cindex grammar rules section
3127@cindex rules section for grammar
3128
3129The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3130rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3131
3132There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3133@samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3134if it is the first thing in the file.
3135
3136@node Epilogue
3137@subsection The epilogue
3138@cindex additional C code section
3139@cindex epilogue
3140@cindex C code, section for additional
3141
3142The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3143implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3144beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3145want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3146before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3147of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3148functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3149functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3150if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3151C-Language Interface}.
3152
3153If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3154from the grammar rules.
3155
3156The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3157start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3158any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3159of the grammar file.
3160
3161@node Symbols
3162@section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3163@cindex nonterminal symbol
3164@cindex terminal symbol
3165@cindex token type
3166@cindex symbol
3167
3168@dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3169of the language.
3170
3171A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3172class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3173rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3174represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3175function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3176been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3177the symbol to stand for it.
3178
3179A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3180equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3181By convention, it should be all lower case.
3182
3183Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3184digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3185with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3186use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3187(@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3188make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3189languages) they are not exported as token names.
3190
3191There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3192
3193@itemize @bullet
3194@item
3195A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3196identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3197such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3198@code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3199
3200@item
3201@cindex character token
3202@cindex literal token
3203@cindex single-character literal
3204A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3205written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3206constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3207character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3208specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3209Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3210,Operator Precedence}).
3211
3212By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3213token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3214type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3215token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3216your program will confuse other readers.
3217
3218All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3219used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3220character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3221end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3222for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3223special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3224allowed.
3225
3226@item
3227@cindex string token
3228@cindex literal string token
3229@cindex multicharacter literal
3230A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3231example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3232doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3233value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3234(@pxref{Precedence}).
3235
3236You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3237alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3238Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3239retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3240@code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3241
3242@strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3243
3244By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3245that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3246type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3247does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3248read your program will be confused.
3249
3250All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3251Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3252string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3253meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3254literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3255containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3256@end itemize
3257
3258How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3259grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3260on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3261
3262The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3263symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3264Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3265it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3266for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3267character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3268requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3269char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3270Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3271file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3272is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3273Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3274
3275If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3276token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3277option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3278into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3279in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3280
3281If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3282host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3283execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3284digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3285characters in the following C-language string:
3286
3287@example
3288"\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3289@end example
3290
3291The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3292and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3293ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3294program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3295EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3296generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3297character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3298contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3299ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3300incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3301compiling them.
3302
3303The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3304(@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3305In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3306value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3307one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3308
3309@node Rules
3310@section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3311@cindex rule syntax
3312@cindex grammar rule syntax
3313@cindex syntax of grammar rules
3314
3315A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3316
3317@example
3318@group
3319@var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3320@end group
3321@end example
3322
3323@noindent
3324where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3325and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3326are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3327
3328For example,
3329
3330@example
3331@group
3332exp: exp '+' exp;
3333@end group
3334@end example
3335
3336@noindent
3337says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3338can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3339
3340White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3341extra white space as you wish.
3342
3343Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3344the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3345
3346@example
3347@{@var{C statements}@}
3348@end example
3349
3350@noindent
3351@cindex braced code
3352This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3353braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3354any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3355does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3356copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3357compiler can check it.
3358
3359Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3360within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3361affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3362braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3363and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3364code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3365nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3366character constants.
3367
3368Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3369@xref{Actions}.
3370
3371@findex |
3372Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3373be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3374
3375@example
3376@group
3377@var{result}:
3378 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3379| @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3380@dots{}
3381;
3382@end group
3383@end example
3384
3385@noindent
3386They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3387
3388If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3389match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3390comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3391
3392@example
3393@group
3394expseq:
3395 /* empty */
3396| expseq1
3397;
3398@end group
3399
3400@group
3401expseq1:
3402 exp
3403| expseq1 ',' exp
3404;
3405@end group
3406@end example
3407
3408@noindent
3409It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3410with no components.
3411
3412@node Recursion
3413@section Recursive Rules
3414@cindex recursive rule
3415
3416A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3417appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3418use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3419number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3420comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3421
3422@example
3423@group
3424expseq1:
3425 exp
3426| expseq1 ',' exp
3427;
3428@end group
3429@end example
3430
3431@cindex left recursion
3432@cindex right recursion
3433@noindent
3434Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3435right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3436the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3437
3438@example
3439@group
3440expseq1:
3441 exp
3442| exp ',' expseq1
3443;
3444@end group
3445@end example
3446
3447@noindent
3448Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3449recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3450parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3451Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3452number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3453shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3454@xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3455of this.
3456
3457@cindex mutual recursion
3458@dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3459rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3460in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3461side.
3462
3463For example:
3464
3465@example
3466@group
3467expr:
3468 primary
3469| primary '+' primary
3470;
3471@end group
3472
3473@group
3474primary:
3475 constant
3476| '(' expr ')'
3477;
3478@end group
3479@end example
3480
3481@noindent
3482defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3483other.
3484
3485@node Semantics
3486@section Defining Language Semantics
3487@cindex defining language semantics
3488@cindex language semantics, defining
3489
3490The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3491are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3492groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3493
3494For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3495associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3496because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3497the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3498
3499@menu
3500* Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3501* Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3502* Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3503* Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3504* Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3505 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3506 action in the middle of a rule.
3507@end menu
3508
3509@node Value Type
3510@subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3511@cindex semantic value type
3512@cindex value type, semantic
3513@cindex data types of semantic values
3514@cindex default data type
3515
3516In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3517the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3518RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3519Notation Calculator}).
3520
3521Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3522program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3523specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3524
3525@example
3526#define YYSTYPE double
3527@end example
3528
3529@noindent
3530@code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3531that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3532This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3533(@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3534
3535@node Multiple Types
3536@subsection More Than One Value Type
3537
3538In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3539of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3540@code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3541@code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3542symbol table.
3543
3544To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3545requires you to do two things:
3546
3547@itemize @bullet
3548@item
3549Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3550@code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3551Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3552define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3553the type tags.
3554
3555@item
3556Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3557which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3558@code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3559and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3560Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3561@end itemize
3562
3563@node Actions
3564@subsection Actions
3565@cindex action
3566@vindex $$
3567@vindex $@var{n}
3568@vindex $@var{name}
3569@vindex $[@var{name}]
3570
3571An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3572each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3573is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3574semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3575
3576An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3577placed at any position in the rule;
3578it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3579end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3580a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3581Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3582
3583The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3584components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3585which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3586value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3587the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3588references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3589Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3590appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3591implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3592for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3593can be assigned to.
3594
3595Here is a typical example:
3596
3597@example
3598@group
3599exp:
3600@dots{}
3601| exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3602@end group
3603@end example
3604
3605Or, in terms of named references:
3606
3607@example
3608@group
3609exp[result]:
3610@dots{}
3611| exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3612@end group
3613@end example
3614
3615@noindent
3616This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3617connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3618(@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3619refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3620which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3621The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3622semantic value of
3623the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3624useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3625referred to as @code{$2}.
3626
3627@xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3628references construct.
3629
3630Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3631separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3632difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3633``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3634following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3635
3636@example
3637@group
3638a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3639@end group
3640@end example
3641
3642@cindex default action
3643If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3644@w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3645becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3646valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3647action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3648unless the rule's value does not matter.
3649
3650@code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3651to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3652current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3653you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3654is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3655
3656@example
3657@group
3658foo:
3659 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3660| expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3661;
3662@end group
3663
3664@group
3665bar:
3666 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3667;
3668@end group
3669@end example
3670
3671As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3672always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3673definition of @code{foo}.
3674
3675@vindex yylval
3676It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3677any, from a semantic action.
3678This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3679@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3680
3681@node Action Types
3682@subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3683@cindex action data types
3684@cindex data types in actions
3685
3686If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3687and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3688
3689If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3690must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3691symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3692@code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3693in the rule. In this example,
3694
3695@example
3696@group
3697exp:
3698 @dots{}
3699| exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3700@end group
3701@end example
3702
3703@noindent
3704@code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3705have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3706@code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3707terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3708
3709Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3710by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3711reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3712
3713@example
3714@group
3715%union @{
3716 int itype;
3717 double dtype;
3718@}
3719@end group
3720@end example
3721
3722@noindent
3723then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3724rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3725
3726@node Mid-Rule Actions
3727@subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3728@cindex actions in mid-rule
3729@cindex mid-rule actions
3730
3731Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3732These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3733are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3734
3735A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3736@code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3737it is run before they are parsed.
3738
3739The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3740This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3741(and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3742along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3743@code{$@var{n}}.
3744
3745The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3746its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3747can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3748to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3749in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3750specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3751
3752There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3753action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3754only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3755at the end of the rule.
3756
3757Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3758statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3759serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3760duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3761@var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3762remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3763
3764@example
3765@group
3766stmt:
3767 LET '(' var ')'
3768 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3769 stmt
3770 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3771@end group
3772@end example
3773
3774@noindent
3775As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3776action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3777list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3778@code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3779@code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3780first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3781parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3782@samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3783
3784After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3785value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3786earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3787removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3788appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3789
3790@findex %destructor
3791@cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3792@cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3793In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3794Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3795it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3796restoring it.
3797Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3798Discarded Symbols}).
3799However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3800a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3801
3802One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3803declare a destructor for that symbol:
3804
3805@example
3806@group
3807%type <context> let
3808%destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3809
3810%%
3811
3812stmt:
3813 let stmt
3814 @{
3815 $$ = $2;
3816 pop_context ($1);
3817 @};
3818
3819let:
3820 LET '(' var ')'
3821 @{
3822 $$ = push_context ();
3823 declare_variable ($3);
3824 @};
3825
3826@end group
3827@end example
3828
3829@noindent
3830Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3831Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3832this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3833
3834Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3835conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3836action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3837can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3838token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3839declaration or not:
3840
3841@example
3842@group
3843compound:
3844 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3845| '@{' statements '@}'
3846;
3847@end group
3848@end example
3849
3850@noindent
3851But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3852
3853@example
3854@group
3855compound:
3856 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3857 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3858@end group
3859@group
3860| '@{' statements '@}'
3861;
3862@end group
3863@end example
3864
3865@noindent
3866Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3867when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3868must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3869information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3870the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3871deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3872
3873You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3874actions into the two rules, like this:
3875
3876@example
3877@group
3878compound:
3879 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3880 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3881| @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3882 '@{' statements '@}'
3883;
3884@end group
3885@end example
3886
3887@noindent
3888But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3889are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3890
3891If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3892statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3893does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3894
3895@example
3896@group
3897compound:
3898 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3899 declarations statements '@}'
3900| '@{' statements '@}'
3901;
3902@end group
3903@end example
3904
3905@noindent
3906Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3907which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3908
3909Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3910serves as a subroutine:
3911
3912@example
3913@group
3914subroutine:
3915 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3916;
3917@end group
3918
3919@group
3920compound:
3921 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3922| subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3923;
3924@end group
3925@end example
3926
3927@noindent
3928Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3929deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3930
3931@node Tracking Locations
3932@section Tracking Locations
3933@cindex location
3934@cindex textual location
3935@cindex location, textual
3936
3937Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3938functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3939especially symbol locations.
3940
3941The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3942actions to take when rules are matched.
3943
3944@menu
3945* Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3946* Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3947* Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3948@end menu
3949
3950@node Location Type
3951@subsection Data Type of Locations
3952@cindex data type of locations
3953@cindex default location type
3954
3955Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3956since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3957
3958You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3959@code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3960defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3961When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3962four members:
3963
3964@example
3965typedef struct YYLTYPE
3966@{
3967 int first_line;
3968 int first_column;
3969 int last_line;
3970 int last_column;
3971@} YYLTYPE;
3972@end example
3973
3974When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3975initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3976@code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3977initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3978Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3979
3980@node Actions and Locations
3981@subsection Actions and Locations
3982@cindex location actions
3983@cindex actions, location
3984@vindex @@$
3985@vindex @@@var{n}
3986@vindex @@@var{name}
3987@vindex @@[@var{name}]
3988
3989Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3990describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3991
3992The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3993similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3994constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3995The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3996@code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3997@code{@@$}.
3998
3999In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4000@code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4001@xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4002references construct.
4003
4004Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4005
4006@example
4007@group
4008exp:
4009 @dots{}
4010| exp '/' exp
4011 @{
4012 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4013 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4014 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4015 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4016 if ($3)
4017 $$ = $1 / $3;
4018 else
4019 @{
4020 $$ = 1;
4021 fprintf (stderr,
4022 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4023 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4024 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4025 @}
4026 @}
4027@end group
4028@end example
4029
4030As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4031run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4032beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4033last symbol.
4034
4035With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4036example above simply rewrites this way:
4037
4038@example
4039@group
4040exp:
4041 @dots{}
4042| exp '/' exp
4043 @{
4044 if ($3)
4045 $$ = $1 / $3;
4046 else
4047 @{
4048 $$ = 1;
4049 fprintf (stderr,
4050 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4051 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4052 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4053 @}
4054 @}
4055@end group
4056@end example
4057
4058@vindex yylloc
4059It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4060from a semantic action.
4061This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4062@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4063
4064@node Location Default Action
4065@subsection Default Action for Locations
4066@vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4067@cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4068
4069Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4070locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4071the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4072rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4073matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4074while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4075Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4076parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4077of that ambiguity.
4078
4079Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4080dedicated code from semantic actions.
4081
4082The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4083the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4084rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4085all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4086parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4087When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4088right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4089When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4090of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4091parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4092
4093By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4094
4095@example
4096@group
4097# define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4098do \
4099 if (N) \
4100 @{ \
4101 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4102 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4103 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4104 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4105 @} \
4106 else \
4107 @{ \
4108 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4109 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4110 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4111 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4112 @} \
4113while (0)
4114@end group
4115@end example
4116
4117@noindent
4118where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4119in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4120just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4121
4122When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4123
4124@itemize @bullet
4125@item
4126All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4127result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4128
4129@item
4130For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4131right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4132valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4133During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4134
4135@item
4136Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4137actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4138macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4139statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4140@end itemize
4141
4142@node Named References
4143@section Named References
4144@cindex named references
4145
4146As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4147semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4148form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4149such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4150insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4151to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4152
4153To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4154using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4155used as named references. For example:
4156
4157@example
4158@group
4159invocation: op '(' args ')'
4160 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4161@end group
4162@end example
4163
4164@noindent
4165Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4166
4167@example
4168@group
4169invocation: op '(' args ')'
4170 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4171@end group
4172@end example
4173
4174@noindent
4175However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4176ambiguities:
4177
4178@example
4179@group
4180exp: exp '/' exp
4181 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4182
4183exp: exp '/' exp
4184 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4185
4186exp: exp '/' exp
4187 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4188@end group
4189@end example
4190
4191@noindent
4192When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4193locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4194appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4195@example
4196@group
4197exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4198 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4199@end group
4200@end example
4201
4202@noindent
4203In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4204explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4205closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4206@example
4207@group
4208exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4209 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4210@end group
4211@end example
4212
4213@noindent
4214
4215In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4216bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4217@example
4218@group
4219if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4220 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4221@end group
4222@end example
4223
4224It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4225C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4226@samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4227@samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4228value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4229entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4230@samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4231
4232The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4233to stabilize it.
4234
4235@node Declarations
4236@section Bison Declarations
4237@cindex declarations, Bison
4238@cindex Bison declarations
4239
4240The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4241used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4242@xref{Symbols}.
4243
4244All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4245@code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4246declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4247value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4248
4249The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4250default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4251must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4252and Context-Free Grammars}).
4253
4254@menu
4255* Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4256* Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4257* Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4258* Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4259* Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4260* Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4261* Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4262* Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4263* Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4264* Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4265* Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4266* Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4267* Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4268* %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4269* %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4270@end menu
4271
4272@node Require Decl
4273@subsection Require a Version of Bison
4274@cindex version requirement
4275@cindex requiring a version of Bison
4276@findex %require
4277
4278You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4279the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4280status 63).
4281
4282@example
4283%require "@var{version}"
4284@end example
4285
4286@node Token Decl
4287@subsection Token Type Names
4288@cindex declaring token type names
4289@cindex token type names, declaring
4290@cindex declaring literal string tokens
4291@findex %token
4292
4293The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4294
4295@example
4296%token @var{name}
4297@end example
4298
4299Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4300the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4301can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4302
4303Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4304@code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4305associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4306Precedence}.
4307
4308You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4309a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4310following the token name:
4311
4312@example
4313%token NUM 300
4314%token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4315@end example
4316
4317@noindent
4318It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4319all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4320with each other or with normal characters.
4321
4322In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4323@code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4324alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4325Than One Value Type}).
4326
4327For example:
4328
4329@example
4330@group
4331%union @{ /* define stack type */
4332 double val;
4333 symrec *tptr;
4334@}
4335%token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4336@end group
4337@end example
4338
4339You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4340writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4341declaration which declares the name. For example:
4342
4343@example
4344%token arrow "=>"
4345@end example
4346
4347@noindent
4348For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4349equivalent literal string tokens:
4350
4351@example
4352%token <operator> OR "||"
4353%token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4354%left OR "<="
4355@end example
4356
4357@noindent
4358Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4359interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4360@code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4361obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4362Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4363the literal string instead of the token name.
4364
4365The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4366allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4367of ``$end'':
4368
4369@example
4370%token END 0 "end of file"
4371@end example
4372
4373@node Precedence Decl
4374@subsection Operator Precedence
4375@cindex precedence declarations
4376@cindex declaring operator precedence
4377@cindex operator precedence, declaring
4378
4379Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4380declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4381once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4382@xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4383operator precedence.
4384
4385The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4386@code{%token}: either
4387
4388@example
4389%left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4390@end example
4391
4392@noindent
4393or
4394
4395@example
4396%left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4397@end example
4398
4399And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4400But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4401all the @var{symbols}:
4402
4403@itemize @bullet
4404@item
4405The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4406of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4407@var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4408grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4409left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4410@code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4411@var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4412means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4413considered a syntax error.
4414
4415@item
4416The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4417All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4418precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4419When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4420the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4421@end itemize
4422
4423For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4424argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4425Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4426A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4427separate token.
4428For example:
4429
4430@example
4431%left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4432%left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4433@end example
4434
4435@node Union Decl
4436@subsection The Collection of Value Types
4437@cindex declaring value types
4438@cindex value types, declaring
4439@findex %union
4440
4441The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4442possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4443followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4444@code{union} in C@.
4445
4446For example:
4447
4448@example
4449@group
4450%union @{
4451 double val;
4452 symrec *tptr;
4453@}
4454@end group
4455@end example
4456
4457@noindent
4458This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4459*}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4460in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4461for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4462
4463As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4464@code{union}. For example:
4465
4466@example
4467@group
4468%union value @{
4469 double val;
4470 symrec *tptr;
4471@}
4472@end group
4473@end example
4474
4475@noindent
4476specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4477@code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4478@code{YYSTYPE}.
4479
4480As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4481@code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4482only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4483
4484Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4485a semicolon after the closing brace.
4486
4487Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4488@code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4489@samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4490a header file @file{parser.h}:
4491
4492@example
4493@group
4494union YYSTYPE @{
4495 double val;
4496 symrec *tptr;
4497@};
4498typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4499@end group
4500@end example
4501
4502@noindent
4503and then your grammar can use the following
4504instead of @code{%union}:
4505
4506@example
4507@group
4508%@{
4509#include "parser.h"
4510%@}
4511%type <val> expr
4512%token <tptr> ID
4513@end group
4514@end example
4515
4516@node Type Decl
4517@subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4518@cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4519@cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4520@findex %type
4521
4522@noindent
4523When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4524declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4525used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4526
4527@example
4528%type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4529@end example
4530
4531@noindent
4532Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4533@var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4534that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4535can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4536declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4537the symbol names.
4538
4539You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4540use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4541terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4542@code{<@var{type}>}.
4543
4544@node Initial Action Decl
4545@subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4546@findex %initial-action
4547
4548Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4549parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4550code.
4551
4552@deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4553@findex %initial-action
4554Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4555@code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4556@code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4557@code{%parse-param}.
4558@end deffn
4559
4560For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4561
4562@example
4563%parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4564%initial-action
4565@{
4566 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4567@};
4568@end example
4569
4570
4571@node Destructor Decl
4572@subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4573@cindex freeing discarded symbols
4574@findex %destructor
4575@findex <*>
4576@findex <>
4577During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4578on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4579until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4580or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4581symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4582must discard the start symbol.
4583
4584When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4585lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4586in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4587protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4588
4589The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4590symbol is automatically discarded.
4591
4592@deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4593@findex %destructor
4594Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4595@var{symbols}.
4596Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4597with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4598The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4599The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4600
4601When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4602per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4603You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4604tag among @var{symbols}.
4605In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4606grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4607per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4608
4609Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4610(These default forms are experimental.
4611More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4612features.)
4613You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4614exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4615The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4616discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4617@code{%destructor}.
4618The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4619symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4620counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4621The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4622symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4623@end deffn
4624
4625@noindent
4626For example:
4627
4628@example
4629%union @{ char *string; @}
4630%token <string> STRING1
4631%token <string> STRING2
4632%type <string> string1
4633%type <string> string2
4634%union @{ char character; @}
4635%token <character> CHR
4636%type <character> chr
4637%token TAGLESS
4638
4639%destructor @{ @} <character>
4640%destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4641%destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4642%destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4643@end example
4644
4645@noindent
4646guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4647semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4648to @code{free} by default.
4649However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4650prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4651It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4652@code{free} only once.
4653Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4654such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4655
4656A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4657user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4658For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4659@code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4660@code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4661none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4662It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4663Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4664reference it in your grammar.
4665However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4666redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4667
4668@example
4669%token END 0
4670@end example
4671
4672@cindex actions in mid-rule
4673@cindex mid-rule actions
4674Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4675mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4676That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4677do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4678(where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4679any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4680Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4681it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4682
4683@ignore
4684@noindent
4685In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4686nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4687In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4688@end ignore
4689
4690@sp 1
4691
4692@cindex discarded symbols
4693@dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4694
4695@itemize
4696@item
4697stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4698@item
4699incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4700@item
4701the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4702right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4703@item
4704the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4705@end itemize
4706
4707The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4708@code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4709exhaustion.
4710
4711Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4712error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4713of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4714the memory.
4715
4716@node Printer Decl
4717@subsection Printing Semantic Values
4718@cindex printing semantic values
4719@findex %printer
4720@findex <*>
4721@findex <>
4722When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4723the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4724in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4725know how semantic values should be formatted.
4726
4727The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4728reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4729Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4730
4731@deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4732@findex %printer
4733@vindex yyoutput
4734@c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4735Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4736@var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4737(a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++),
4738@code{$$} designates the semantic value associated with the symbol, and
4739@code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are also
4740available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4741
4742The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4743Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4744@samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4745typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4746@samp{<>}).
4747@end deffn
4748
4749@noindent
4750For example:
4751
4752@example
4753%union @{ char *string; @}
4754%token <string> STRING1
4755%token <string> STRING2
4756%type <string> string1
4757%type <string> string2
4758%union @{ char character; @}
4759%token <character> CHR
4760%type <character> chr
4761%token TAGLESS
4762
4763%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4764%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4765%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4766%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4767@end example
4768
4769@noindent
4770guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4771tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4772value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4773@code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4774only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4775Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4776that has no semantic type tag. See also
4777
4778
4779@node Expect Decl
4780@subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4781@cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4782@cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4783@cindex warnings, preventing
4784@cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4785@findex %expect
4786@findex %expect-rr
4787
4788Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4789(@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4790have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4791way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4792the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4793changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4794
4795The declaration looks like this:
4796
4797@example
4798%expect @var{n}
4799@end example
4800
4801Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4802be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4803Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4804from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4805
4806For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4807serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4808reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4809parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4810there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4811also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4812in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4813
4814@example
4815%expect-rr @var{n}
4816@end example
4817
4818In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4819
4820@itemize @bullet
4821@item
4822Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4823to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4824print the number of conflicts.
4825
4826@item
4827Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4828resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4829go back to the beginning.
4830
4831@item
4832Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4833number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4834@code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4835@end itemize
4836
4837Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4838but will keep silent otherwise.
4839
4840@node Start Decl
4841@subsection The Start-Symbol
4842@cindex declaring the start symbol
4843@cindex start symbol, declaring
4844@cindex default start symbol
4845@findex %start
4846
4847Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4848nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4849may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4850
4851@example
4852%start @var{symbol}
4853@end example
4854
4855@node Pure Decl
4856@subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4857@cindex reentrant parser
4858@cindex pure parser
4859@findex %define api.pure
4860
4861A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4862execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4863code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4864for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4865handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4866program must be called only within interlocks.
4867
4868Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4869suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4870standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4871statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4872including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4873
4874Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4875declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4876reentrant. It looks like this:
4877
4878@example
4879%define api.pure
4880@end example
4881
4882The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4883@code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4884calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4885@code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4886Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4887becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4888of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4889Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4890@code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4891
4892Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4893You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4894valid grammar.
4895
4896@node Push Decl
4897@subsection A Push Parser
4898@cindex push parser
4899@cindex push parser
4900@findex %define api.push-pull
4901
4902(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4903More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4904
4905A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4906is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4907each time a new token is made available.
4908
4909A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4910main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4911a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4912within a certain time period.
4913
4914Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4915The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4916parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4917
4918@example
4919%define api.push-pull push
4920@end example
4921
4922In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4923a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4924time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4925compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4926what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4927
4928@example
4929%define api.pure
4930%define api.push-pull push
4931@end example
4932
4933There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4934and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4935many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4936An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4937
4938When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4939the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4940parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4941function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4942will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4943Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4944token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4945of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4946
4947@example
4948int status;
4949yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4950do @{
4951 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4952@} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4953yypstate_delete (ps);
4954@end example
4955
4956If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4957the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4958a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4959For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4960changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4961example would thus look like this:
4962
4963@example
4964extern int yychar;
4965int status;
4966yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4967do @{
4968 yychar = yylex ();
4969 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4970@} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4971yypstate_delete (ps);
4972@end example
4973
4974That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4975for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4976
4977Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4978interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4979you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4980@code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4981the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4982and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4983would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4984generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4985This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4986@code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4987@code{yyparse} function. If the user
4988calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4989stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4990and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4991to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4992write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4993for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4994like this:
4995
4996@example
4997yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4998yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4999yypstate_delete (ps);
5000@end example
5001
5002Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5003the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5004@code{%define api.push-pull push}.
5005
5006@node Decl Summary
5007@subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5008@cindex Bison declaration summary
5009@cindex declaration summary
5010@cindex summary, Bison declaration
5011
5012Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5013
5014@deffn {Directive} %union
5015Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5016(@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5017@end deffn
5018
5019@deffn {Directive} %token
5020Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5021or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5022@end deffn
5023
5024@deffn {Directive} %right
5025Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5026(@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5027@end deffn
5028
5029@deffn {Directive} %left
5030Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5031(@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5032@end deffn
5033
5034@deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5035Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5036(@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5037Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5038@end deffn
5039
5040@ifset defaultprec
5041@deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5042Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5043(@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5044@end deffn
5045@end ifset
5046
5047@deffn {Directive} %type
5048Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5049(@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5050@end deffn
5051
5052@deffn {Directive} %start
5053Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5054Start-Symbol}).
5055@end deffn
5056
5057@deffn {Directive} %expect
5058Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5059(@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5060@end deffn
5061
5062
5063@sp 1
5064@noindent
5065In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5066directives:
5067
5068@deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5069@deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5070@findex %code
5071Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5072default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5073@xref{%code Summary}.
5074@end deffn
5075
5076@deffn {Directive} %debug
5077In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
50781 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5079compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5080@end deffn
5081
5082@deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5083@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5084@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5085Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5086@end deffn
5087
5088@deffn {Directive} %defines
5089Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5090type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5091If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5092the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5093
5094For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5095@code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5096@code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5097you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5098Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5099have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5100Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5101definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5102a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5103other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5104
5105Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5106@code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5107(Reentrant) Parser}.
5108
5109If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5110@code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5111@code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5112
5113This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5114definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5115@code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5116above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5117Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5118
5119@findex %code requires
5120@findex %code provides
5121If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5122header also contains their code.
5123@xref{%code Summary}.
5124@end deffn
5125
5126@deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5127Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5128@end deffn
5129
5130@deffn {Directive} %destructor
5131Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5132discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5133@end deffn
5134
5135@deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5136Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5137are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5138@end deffn
5139
5140@deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5141Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5142supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5143@var{language} is case-insensitive.
5144
5145This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5146releases.
5147@end deffn
5148
5149@deffn {Directive} %locations
5150Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5151,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5152the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5153grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5154accurate syntax error messages.
5155@end deffn
5156
5157@deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5158Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5159@var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5160in C parsers
5161is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5162@code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5163(if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5164@code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5165@code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5166also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5167names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5168For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5169section.
5170@xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5171@end deffn
5172
5173@ifset defaultprec
5174@deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5175Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5176modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5177Precedence}).
5178@end deffn
5179@end ifset
5180
5181@deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5182Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5183implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5184parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5185associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5186file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5187implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5188own right.
5189@end deffn
5190
5191@deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5192Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5193@end deffn
5194
5195@deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5196Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5197Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5198unreasonable usage.
5199@end deffn
5200
5201@deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5202Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5203Require a Version of Bison}.
5204@end deffn
5205
5206@deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5207Specify the skeleton to use.
5208
5209@c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5210@c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5211@c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5212@c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5213
5214If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5215file in the Bison installation directory.
5216If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5217directory of the grammar file.
5218This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5219@end deffn
5220
5221@deffn {Directive} %token-table
5222Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5223The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5224the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5225@var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5226predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5227@code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5228grammar file.
5229
5230The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5231the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5232strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5233escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5234@code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5235@code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5236corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5237@code{"\"\\\\/\""}.
5238
5239When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5240definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5241@code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5242
5243@table @code
5244@item YYNTOKENS
5245The highest token number, plus one.
5246@item YYNNTS
5247The number of nonterminal symbols.
5248@item YYNRULES
5249The number of grammar rules,
5250@item YYNSTATES
5251The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5252@end table
5253@end deffn
5254
5255@deffn {Directive} %verbose
5256Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5257parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5258that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5259information.
5260@end deffn
5261
5262@deffn {Directive} %yacc
5263Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5264including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5265@end deffn
5266
5267
5268@node %define Summary
5269@subsection %define Summary
5270
5271There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5272assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5273such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5274@code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5275features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5276@code{%define} directive:
5277
5278@deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5279@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5280@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5281Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5282
5283@var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5284character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5285or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5286to specifying @code{""}.
5287
5288It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5289multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5290@var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5291@end deffn
5292
5293The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5294@code{%define} accepts.
5295
5296Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5297complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5298four conditions:
5299
5300@enumerate
5301@item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5302
5303@item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5304This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5305
5306@item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5307
5308@item @var{variable} is never defined.
5309In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5310@end enumerate
5311
5312What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5313values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5314skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5315Summary,,%skeleton}).
5316Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5317Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5318
5319@itemize @bullet
5320@c ================================================== api.pure
5321@item api.pure
5322@findex %define api.pure
5323
5324@itemize @bullet
5325@item Language(s): C
5326
5327@item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5328@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5329
5330@item Accepted Values: Boolean
5331
5332@item Default Value: @code{false}
5333@end itemize
5334
5335@item api.push-pull
5336@findex %define api.push-pull
5337
5338@itemize @bullet
5339@item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5340
5341@item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5342@xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5343(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5344More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5345
5346@item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5347
5348@item Default Value: @code{pull}
5349@end itemize
5350
5351@c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5352
5353@item lr.default-reductions
5354@findex %define lr.default-reductions
5355
5356@itemize @bullet
5357@item Language(s): all
5358
5359@item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5360contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5361specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5362feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5363
5364@item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5365@item Default Value:
5366@itemize
5367@item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5368@item @code{most} otherwise.
5369@end itemize
5370@end itemize
5371
5372@c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5373
5374@item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5375@findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5376
5377@itemize @bullet
5378@item Language(s): all
5379@item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5380remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5381@item Accepted Values: Boolean
5382@item Default Value: @code{false}
5383@end itemize
5384
5385@c ================================================== lr.type
5386
5387@item lr.type
5388@findex %define lr.type
5389
5390@itemize @bullet
5391@item Language(s): all
5392
5393@item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5394LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5395More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5396
5397@item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5398
5399@item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5400@end itemize
5401
5402@item namespace
5403@findex %define namespace
5404
5405@itemize
5406@item Languages(s): C++
5407
5408@item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5409For example, if you specify:
5410
5411@smallexample
5412%define namespace "foo::bar"
5413@end smallexample
5414
5415Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5416
5417@smallexample
5418foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5419@end smallexample
5420
5421However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5422splits on any remaining occurrences:
5423
5424@smallexample
5425namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5426 class position;
5427 class location;
5428@} @}
5429@end smallexample
5430
5431@item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5432a trailing @code{"::"}.
5433For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5434
5435@item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5436to @code{yy}.
5437This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5438confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5439lexical analyzer function.
5440Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5441@code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5442lexical analyzer function.
5443For example, if you specify:
5444
5445@smallexample
5446%define namespace "foo"
5447%name-prefix "bar::"
5448@end smallexample
5449
5450The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5451@code{bar::lex}.
5452@end itemize
5453
5454@c ================================================== parse.lac
5455@item parse.lac
5456@findex %define parse.lac
5457
5458@itemize
5459@item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5460
5461@item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5462syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5463@item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5464@item Default Value: @code{none}
5465@end itemize
5466@end itemize
5467
5468
5469@node %code Summary
5470@subsection %code Summary
5471@findex %code
5472@cindex Prologue
5473
5474The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5475parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5476as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5477prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5478functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5479supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5480@code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5481is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5482
5483@deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5484This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5485inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5486in the parser implementation.
5487
5488For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5489after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5490unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5491
5492For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5493@end deffn
5494
5495@deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5496This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5497@var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5498location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5499specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5500default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5501this form instead.
5502@end deffn
5503
5504For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5505multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5506the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5507file.
5508
5509Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5510qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5511
5512@itemize @bullet
5513@item requires
5514@findex %code requires
5515
5516@itemize @bullet
5517@item Language(s): C, C++
5518
5519@item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5520@code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5521In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5522directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5523and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5524
5525@item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5526before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5527definitions.
5528@end itemize
5529
5530@item provides
5531@findex %code provides
5532
5533@itemize @bullet
5534@item Language(s): C, C++
5535
5536@item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5537declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5538
5539@item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5540file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5541token definitions.
5542@end itemize
5543
5544@item top
5545@findex %code top
5546
5547@itemize @bullet
5548@item Language(s): C, C++
5549
5550@item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5551should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5552occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5553parser implementation file. For example:
5554
5555@example
5556%code top @{
5557 #define _GNU_SOURCE
5558 #include <stdio.h>
5559@}
5560@end example
5561
5562@item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5563@end itemize
5564
5565@item imports
5566@findex %code imports
5567
5568@itemize @bullet
5569@item Language(s): Java
5570
5571@item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5572
5573@item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5574before any class definitions.
5575@end itemize
5576@end itemize
5577
5578Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5579technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5580however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5581of the standard Bison skeletons.
5582
5583
5584@node Multiple Parsers
5585@section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5586
5587Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5588only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5589language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5590between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5591
5592The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5593(@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5594functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5595instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5596names that do not conflict.
5597
5598The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5599@code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5600@code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5601@code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5602@code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5603For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5604@code{clex}, and so on.
5605
5606@strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5607renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5608name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5609renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5610no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5611
5612The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5613beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5614as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5615one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5616
5617@node Interface
5618@chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5619@cindex C-language interface
5620@cindex interface
5621
5622The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5623describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5624functions that it needs to use.
5625
5626Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5627@samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5628identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5629in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5630
5631@menu
5632* Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5633* Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5634* Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5635* Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5636* Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5637* Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5638 which reads tokens.
5639* Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5640* Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5641* Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5642 native language.
5643@end menu
5644
5645@node Parser Function
5646@section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5647@findex yyparse
5648
5649You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5650function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5651encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5652write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5653without reading further.
5654
5655
5656@deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5657The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5658is due to end-of-input).
5659
5660The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5661that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5662invoked.
5663
5664The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5665@end deftypefun
5666
5667In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5668these macros:
5669
5670@defmac YYACCEPT
5671@findex YYACCEPT
5672Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5673@end defmac
5674
5675@defmac YYABORT
5676@findex YYABORT
5677Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5678@end defmac
5679
5680If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5681parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5682declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5683
5684@deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5685@findex %parse-param
5686Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5687@var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5688The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5689functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5690@var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5691@end deffn
5692
5693Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5694
5695@example
5696%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5697%parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5698@end example
5699
5700@noindent
5701Then call the parser like this:
5702
5703@example
5704@{
5705 int nastiness, randomness;
5706 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5707 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5708 @dots{}
5709@}
5710@end example
5711
5712@noindent
5713In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5714
5715@example
5716exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5717@end example
5718
5719@node Push Parser Function
5720@section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5721@findex yypush_parse
5722
5723(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5724More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5725
5726You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5727function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5728@code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5729@xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5730
5731@deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5732The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5733following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5734is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5735@end deftypefun
5736
5737@node Pull Parser Function
5738@section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5739@findex yypull_parse
5740
5741(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5742More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5743
5744You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5745stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5746declaration is used.
5747@xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5748
5749@deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5750The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5751@end deftypefun
5752
5753@node Parser Create Function
5754@section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5755@findex yypstate_new
5756
5757(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5758More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5759
5760You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5761This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5762@code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5763@xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5764
5765@deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
5766The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5767or 0 if no memory was available.
5768In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5769allocated.
5770@end deftypefun
5771
5772@node Parser Delete Function
5773@section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5774@findex yypstate_delete
5775
5776(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5777More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5778
5779You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5780function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5781@code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5782@xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5783
5784@deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5785This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5786After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5787@end deftypefun
5788
5789@node Lexical
5790@section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5791@findex yylex
5792@cindex lexical analyzer
5793
5794The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5795the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5796this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5797call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5798
5799In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5800Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5801file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5802available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5803Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5804parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5805the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5806Bison}.
5807
5808@menu
5809* Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5810* Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5811 of the token it has read.
5812* Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5813 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5814 actions want that.
5815* Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5816 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5817@end menu
5818
5819@node Calling Convention
5820@subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5821
5822The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5823for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5824signifies end-of-input.
5825
5826When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5827in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5828is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5829use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5830
5831When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5832the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5833So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5834to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5835must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5836signifies end-of-input.
5837
5838Here is an example showing these things:
5839
5840@example
5841int
5842yylex (void)
5843@{
5844 @dots{}
5845 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5846 return 0;
5847 @dots{}
5848 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5849 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5850 @dots{}
5851 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5852 @dots{}
5853@}
5854@end example
5855
5856@noindent
5857This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5858utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5859
5860If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5861@code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5862
5863@itemize @bullet
5864@item
5865If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5866literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5867all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5868the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5869
5870@item
5871@code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5872table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5873The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5874double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5875token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5876to Bison.
5877
5878Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5879assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5880@code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5881characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5882
5883@example
5884for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5885 @{
5886 if (yytname[i] != 0
5887 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5888 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5889 strlen (token_buffer))
5890 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5891 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5892 break;
5893 @}
5894@end example
5895
5896The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5897@code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5898@end itemize
5899
5900@node Token Values
5901@subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5902
5903@vindex yylval
5904In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5905be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5906just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5907Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5908@code{yylex}:
5909
5910@example
5911@group
5912 @dots{}
5913 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5914 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5915 @dots{}
5916@end group
5917@end example
5918
5919When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5920made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5921Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5922must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5923declaration looks like this:
5924
5925@example
5926@group
5927%union @{
5928 int intval;
5929 double val;
5930 symrec *tptr;
5931@}
5932@end group
5933@end example
5934
5935@noindent
5936then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5937
5938@example
5939@group
5940 @dots{}
5941 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5942 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5943 @dots{}
5944@end group
5945@end example
5946
5947@node Token Locations
5948@subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5949
5950@vindex yylloc
5951If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
5952in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
5953then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
5954@code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
5955in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
5956data in that variable.
5957
5958By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5959initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5960four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5961@code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5962feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5963
5964@tindex YYLTYPE
5965The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5966
5967@node Pure Calling
5968@subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5969
5970When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5971pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5972and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5973Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5974pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5975shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5976pointers.
5977
5978@example
5979int
5980yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5981@{
5982 @dots{}
5983 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5984 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5985 @dots{}
5986@}
5987@end example
5988
5989If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5990textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5991this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5992only one argument.
5993
5994
5995If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5996@code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5997Function}).
5998
5999@deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6000@findex %lex-param
6001Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6002additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6003@end deffn
6004
6005For instance:
6006
6007@example
6008%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6009%lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6010%parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6011@end example
6012
6013@noindent
6014results in the following signature:
6015
6016@example
6017int yylex (int *nastiness);
6018int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6019@end example
6020
6021If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
6022
6023@example
6024int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6025int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6026@end example
6027
6028@noindent
6029and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6030
6031@example
6032int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6033int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6034@end example
6035
6036@node Error Reporting
6037@section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6038@cindex error reporting function
6039@findex yyerror
6040@cindex parse error
6041@cindex syntax error
6042
6043The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6044whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6045action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6046macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6047in Actions}).
6048
6049The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6050reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6051called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6052receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6053@w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6054
6055@findex %error-verbose
6056If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
6057section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6058Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6059just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6060contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6061
6062The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6063can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6064nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6065parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6066if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6067fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6068
6069In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6070translated automatically from English to some other language before
6071they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6072
6073The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6074
6075@example
6076@group
6077void
6078yyerror (char const *s)
6079@{
6080@end group
6081@group
6082 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6083@}
6084@end group
6085@end example
6086
6087After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6088error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6089(@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6090immediately return 1.
6091
6092Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6093an access to the current location.
6094This is indeed the case for the GLR
6095parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6096@samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6097@code{yyerror} are:
6098
6099@example
6100void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6101void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6102@end example
6103
6104If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6105
6106@example
6107void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6108void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6109@end example
6110
6111Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6112convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6113convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6114@code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6115I.e.:
6116
6117@example
6118/* Location tracking. */
6119%locations
6120/* Pure yylex. */
6121%define api.pure
6122%lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6123/* Pure yyparse. */
6124%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6125%parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6126@end example
6127
6128@noindent
6129results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6130
6131@example
6132int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6133int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6134void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6135 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6136 char const *msg);
6137@end example
6138
6139@noindent
6140The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6141uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6142value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6143Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6144message is always passed last.
6145
6146Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6147ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6148preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6149@code{yyerror}.
6150
6151@vindex yynerrs
6152The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6153reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6154request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6155then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6156
6157@node Action Features
6158@section Special Features for Use in Actions
6159@cindex summary, action features
6160@cindex action features summary
6161
6162Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6163are useful in actions.
6164
6165@deffn {Variable} $$
6166Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6167grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6168@end deffn
6169
6170@deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6171Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6172@var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6173@end deffn
6174
6175@deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6176Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6177specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6178Types of Values in Actions}.
6179@end deffn
6180
6181@deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6182Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6183union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6184@xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6185@end deffn
6186
6187@deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6188Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6189@xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6190@end deffn
6191
6192@deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6193Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6194@xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6195@end deffn
6196
6197@deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6198@findex YYBACKUP
6199Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6200a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6201It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6202It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6203semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6204going to be reduced by this rule.
6205
6206If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6207a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6208a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6209recovery.
6210
6211In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6212@end deffn
6213
6214@deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6215Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6216@end deffn
6217
6218@deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6219Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6220stream.
6221@end deffn
6222
6223@deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6224Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6225recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6226does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6227want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6228the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6229@end deffn
6230
6231@deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6232@findex YYRECOVERING
6233The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6234is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6235@xref{Error Recovery}.
6236@end deffn
6237
6238@deffn {Variable} yychar
6239Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6240lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6241has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6242Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6243Actions}).
6244@xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6245@end deffn
6246
6247@deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6248Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6249error rules.
6250Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6251Semantic Actions}).
6252@xref{Error Recovery}.
6253@end deffn
6254
6255@deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6256Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6257errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6258@xref{Error Recovery}.
6259@end deffn
6260
6261@deffn {Variable} yylloc
6262Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6263to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6264Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6265Actions}).
6266@xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6267@end deffn
6268
6269@deffn {Variable} yylval
6270Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6271not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6272Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6273Actions}).
6274@xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6275@end deffn
6276
6277@deffn {Value} @@$
6278@findex @@$
6279Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6280location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6281Locations}.
6282
6283@c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6284
6285@c @example
6286@c struct @{
6287@c int first_line, last_line;
6288@c int first_column, last_column;
6289@c @};
6290@c @end example
6291
6292@c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6293@c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6294
6295@c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6296@c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6297@c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6298@c those members.
6299
6300@c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6301@end deffn
6302
6303@deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6304@findex @@@var{n}
6305Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6306location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6307Locations}.
6308@end deffn
6309
6310@node Internationalization
6311@section Parser Internationalization
6312@cindex internationalization
6313@cindex i18n
6314@cindex NLS
6315@cindex gettext
6316@cindex bison-po
6317
6318A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6319tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6320also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6321make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6322@xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6323For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6324set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6325encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6326installation.
6327
6328The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6329the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6330steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6331GNU Automake.
6332
6333@enumerate
6334@item
6335@cindex bison-i18n.m4
6336Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6337by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6338@file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6339@samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6340For example:
6341
6342@example
6343cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6344@end example
6345
6346@item
6347@findex BISON_I18N
6348@vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6349@vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6350In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6351invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6352defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6353causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6354@code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6355symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6356Bison-generated parser.
6357
6358@item
6359In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6360containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6361@samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6362For example:
6363
6364@example
6365bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6366@end example
6367
6368Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6369(PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6370@samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6371@file{Makefile}.
6372
6373@item
6374In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6375function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6376either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6377
6378@example
6379DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6380@end example
6381
6382or:
6383
6384@example
6385AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6386@end example
6387
6388@item
6389Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6390infrastructure.
6391@end enumerate
6392
6393
6394@node Algorithm
6395@chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6396@cindex Bison parser algorithm
6397@cindex algorithm of parser
6398@cindex shifting
6399@cindex reduction
6400@cindex parser stack
6401@cindex stack, parser
6402
6403As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6404semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6405token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6406
6407For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6408@samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6409that was shifted.
6410
6411But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6412the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6413grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6414@dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6415single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6416Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6417is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6418
6419For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6420
6421@example
64221 + 5 * 3
6423@end example
6424
6425@noindent
6426and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6427elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6428
6429@example
6430expr: expr '*' expr;
6431@end example
6432
6433@noindent
6434Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6435
6436@example
64371 + 15
6438@end example
6439
6440@noindent
6441At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
644216. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6443
6444The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6445to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6446(@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6447
6448This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6449
6450@menu
6451* Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6452* Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6453* Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6454* Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6455* Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6456* Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6457* Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6458* Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6459* Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6460* Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6461@end menu
6462
6463@node Lookahead
6464@section Lookahead Tokens
6465@cindex lookahead token
6466
6467The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6468last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6469simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6470reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6471token in order to decide what to do.
6472
6473When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6474@dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6475perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6476the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6477should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6478does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6479token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6480application.
6481
6482Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6483expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6484factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6485
6486@example
6487@group
6488expr:
6489 term '+' expr
6490| term
6491;
6492@end group
6493
6494@group
6495term:
6496 '(' expr ')'
6497| term '!'
6498| NUMBER
6499;
6500@end group
6501@end example
6502
6503Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6504should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6505tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6506course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6507@w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6508
6509If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6510that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6511parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6512@code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6513doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6514'!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6515
6516@vindex yychar
6517@vindex yylval
6518@vindex yylloc
6519The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6520Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6521@code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6522@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6523
6524@node Shift/Reduce
6525@section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6526@cindex conflicts
6527@cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6528@cindex dangling @code{else}
6529@cindex @code{else}, dangling
6530
6531Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6532statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6533
6534@example
6535@group
6536if_stmt:
6537 IF expr THEN stmt
6538| IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6539;
6540@end group
6541@end example
6542
6543@noindent
6544Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6545terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6546
6547When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6548contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6549reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6550@code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6551rule.
6552
6553This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6554called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6555these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6556operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6557contrast it with the other alternative.
6558
6559Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6560the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6561equivalent:
6562
6563@example
6564if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6565
6566if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6567@end example
6568
6569But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6570result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6571making these two inputs equivalent:
6572
6573@example
6574if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6575
6576if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6577@end example
6578
6579The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6580parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6581convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6582else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6583by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6584write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6585This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6586Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6587
6588To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6589conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6590There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6591is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6592different number.
6593@xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6594
6595The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6596conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6597rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6598the conflict:
6599
6600@example
6601@group
6602%token IF THEN ELSE variable
6603%%
6604@end group
6605@group
6606stmt:
6607 expr
6608| if_stmt
6609;
6610@end group
6611
6612@group
6613if_stmt:
6614 IF expr THEN stmt
6615| IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6616;
6617@end group
6618
6619expr:
6620 variable
6621;
6622@end example
6623
6624@node Precedence
6625@section Operator Precedence
6626@cindex operator precedence
6627@cindex precedence of operators
6628
6629Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6630expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6631Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6632shift and when to reduce.
6633
6634@menu
6635* Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6636* Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6637* Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6638* How Precedence:: How they work.
6639@end menu
6640
6641@node Why Precedence
6642@subsection When Precedence is Needed
6643
6644Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6645input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6646
6647@example
6648@group
6649expr:
6650 expr '-' expr
6651| expr '*' expr
6652| expr '<' expr
6653| '(' expr ')'
6654@dots{}
6655;
6656@end group
6657@end example
6658
6659@noindent
6660Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6661should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6662depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6663must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6664token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6665the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6666shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6667different results.
6668
6669To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6670the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6671first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6672The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6673hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6674is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6675reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6676@samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6677@samp{<}.
6678
6679@cindex associativity
6680What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6681@w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6682operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6683The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6684assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6685matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6686contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6687makes right-associativity.
6688
6689@node Using Precedence
6690@subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6691@findex %left
6692@findex %right
6693@findex %nonassoc
6694
6695Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6696declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6697contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6698associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6699those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6700them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6701declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6702row''.
6703
6704The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6705order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6706@code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6707precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6708whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6709
6710@node Precedence Examples
6711@subsection Precedence Examples
6712
6713In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6714
6715@example
6716%left '<'
6717%left '-'
6718%left '*'
6719@end example
6720
6721In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6722would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6723declared with @code{'-'}:
6724
6725@example
6726%left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6727%left '+' '-'
6728%left '*' '/'
6729@end example
6730
6731@noindent
6732(Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6733and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6734and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6735
6736@node How Precedence
6737@subsection How Precedence Works
6738
6739The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6740levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6741precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6742the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6743specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6744Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6745
6746Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6747of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6748token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6749precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6750precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6751precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6752(@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6753resolved.
6754
6755Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6756the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6757
6758@node Contextual Precedence
6759@section Context-Dependent Precedence
6760@cindex context-dependent precedence
6761@cindex unary operator precedence
6762@cindex precedence, context-dependent
6763@cindex precedence, unary operator
6764@findex %prec
6765
6766Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6767outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6768sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6769somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6770
6771The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6772@code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6773only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6774precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6775modifier for rules.
6776
6777The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6778specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6779It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6780modifier's syntax is:
6781
6782@example
6783%prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6784@end example
6785
6786@noindent
6787and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6788assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6789the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6790altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6791are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6792
6793Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6794a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6795are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6796precedence:
6797
6798@example
6799@dots{}
6800%left '+' '-'
6801%left '*'
6802%left UMINUS
6803@end example
6804
6805Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6806
6807@example
6808@group
6809exp:
6810 @dots{}
6811| exp '-' exp
6812 @dots{}
6813| '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6814@end group
6815@end example
6816
6817@ifset defaultprec
6818If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6819minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6820This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6821discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6822
6823The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6824this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6825@code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6826symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6827
6828If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6829for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6830Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6831to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6832explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6833grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6834
6835The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6836@code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6837@end ifset
6838
6839@node Parser States
6840@section Parser States
6841@cindex finite-state machine
6842@cindex parser state
6843@cindex state (of parser)
6844
6845The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6846The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6847represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6848near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6849about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6850
6851Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6852with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6853entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6854specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6855parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6856This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6857the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6858that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6859pushed.
6860
6861There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6862is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6863(@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6864
6865@node Reduce/Reduce
6866@section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6867@cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6868@cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6869
6870A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6871to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6872in the grammar.
6873
6874For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6875of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6876
6877@example
6878@group
6879sequence:
6880 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6881| maybeword
6882| sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6883;
6884@end group
6885
6886@group
6887maybeword:
6888 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6889| word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6890;
6891@end group
6892@end example
6893
6894@noindent
6895The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6896@code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6897@code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6898Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6899via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6900using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6901
6902There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6903@code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6904or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6905
6906You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6907does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6908affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6909action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6910In this example, the output of the program changes.
6911
6912Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6913appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6914reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6915proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6916
6917@example
6918sequence:
6919 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6920| sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6921;
6922@end example
6923
6924Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6925
6926@example
6927sequence:
6928 /* empty */
6929| sequence words
6930| sequence redirects
6931;
6932
6933words:
6934 /* empty */
6935| words word
6936;
6937
6938redirects:
6939 /* empty */
6940| redirects redirect
6941;
6942@end example
6943
6944@noindent
6945The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6946@code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6947@code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6948three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6949in infinitely many ways!
6950
6951Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6952@code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6953@code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6954followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6955
6956Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6957of sequence:
6958
6959@example
6960sequence:
6961 /* empty */
6962| sequence word
6963| sequence redirect
6964;
6965@end example
6966
6967Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6968from being empty:
6969
6970@example
6971@group
6972sequence:
6973 /* empty */
6974| sequence words
6975| sequence redirects
6976;
6977@end group
6978
6979@group
6980words:
6981 word
6982| words word
6983;
6984@end group
6985
6986@group
6987redirects:
6988 redirect
6989| redirects redirect
6990;
6991@end group
6992@end example
6993
6994@node Mysterious Conflicts
6995@section Mysterious Conflicts
6996@cindex Mysterious Conflicts
6997
6998Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6999Here is an example:
7000
7001@example
7002@group
7003%token ID
7004
7005%%
7006def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7007param_spec:
7008 type
7009| name_list ':' type
7010;
7011@end group
7012@group
7013return_spec:
7014 type
7015| name ':' type
7016;
7017@end group
7018@group
7019type: ID;
7020@end group
7021@group
7022name: ID;
7023name_list:
7024 name
7025| name ',' name_list
7026;
7027@end group
7028@end example
7029
7030It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7031of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7032a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7033@code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7034
7035@cindex LR
7036@cindex LALR
7037However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7038LR(1) grammars.
7039In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7040of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7041@code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7042same.
7043They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7044active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7045a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7046that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7047contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7048the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7049occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7050
7051@cindex IELR
7052@cindex canonical LR
7053For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7054class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7055mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7056is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7057IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7058and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7059details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7060experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7061
7062If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7063can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7064that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7065distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7066@code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7067
7068@example
7069@group
7070%token BOGUS
7071@dots{}
7072%%
7073@dots{}
7074return_spec:
7075 type
7076| name ':' type
7077| ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
7078;
7079@end group
7080@end example
7081
7082This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7083additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7084@code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7085in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7086As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7087the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7088
7089In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7090rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7091instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7092contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7093@code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7094rather than the one for @code{name}.
7095
7096@example
7097param_spec:
7098 type
7099| name_list ':' type
7100;
7101return_spec:
7102 type
7103| ID ':' type
7104;
7105@end example
7106
7107For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7108generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7109
7110@node Tuning LR
7111@section Tuning LR
7112
7113The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7114historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7115the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7116produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7117Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7118the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7119sometimes contain incorrect information.
7120
7121In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7122to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7123these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7124Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7125
7126Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7127user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7128
7129@menu
7130* LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7131* Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7132* LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7133* Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7134@end menu
7135
7136@node LR Table Construction
7137@subsection LR Table Construction
7138@cindex Mysterious Conflict
7139@cindex LALR
7140@cindex IELR
7141@cindex canonical LR
7142@findex %define lr.type
7143
7144For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7145However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7146As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7147mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7148Conflicts}.
7149
7150As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7151eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7152Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7153discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7154difficult as well.
7155
7156Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7157mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7158parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7159directive.
7160
7161@deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7162Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7163values for @var{TYPE} are:
7164
7165@itemize
7166@item @code{lalr} (default)
7167@item @code{ielr}
7168@item @code{canonical-lr}
7169@end itemize
7170
7171(This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7172it.)
7173@end deffn
7174
7175For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7176grammar file:
7177
7178@example
7179%define lr.type ielr
7180@end example
7181
7182@noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7183conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7184comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7185during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7186behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7187continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7188That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7189algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7190LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7191safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7192
7193While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7194or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7195(@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7196relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7197Bison:
7198
7199@itemize
7200@item LALR
7201
7202There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7203
7204@itemize
7205@item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7206
7207@cindex GLR with LALR
7208When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7209conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7210the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7211the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7212the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7213parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7214Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7215more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7216conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7217avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7218
7219@item Malformed grammars.
7220
7221Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7222major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7223table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7224tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7225differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7226@end itemize
7227
7228@item IELR
7229
7230IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7231any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7232always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7233merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7234parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7235More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7236duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7237for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7238significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7239
7240@item Canonical LR
7241
7242@cindex delayed syntax error detection
7243@cindex LAC
7244@findex %nonassoc
7245While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7246explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7247do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7248left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7249every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7250guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7251that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7252parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7253guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7254any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7255able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7256default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7257@end itemize
7258
7259For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7260and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7261@ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7262
7263@node Default Reductions
7264@subsection Default Reductions
7265@cindex default reductions
7266@findex %define lr.default-reductions
7267@findex %nonassoc
7268
7269After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7270largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7271parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7272to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7273is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7274
7275Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7276also affect the behavior of the parser:
7277
7278@itemize
7279@item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7280
7281@cindex delayed yylex invocations
7282@cindex consistent states
7283@cindex defaulted states
7284A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7285action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7286reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7287Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7288invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7289In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7290determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7291token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7292eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7293parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7294parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7295
7296The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7297designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7298@code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7299associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7300next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7301For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7302uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7303to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7304should already be considered closed.
7305
7306@item Delayed syntax error detection.
7307
7308@cindex delayed syntax error detection
7309When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7310whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7311parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7312for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7313the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7314that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7315impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7316Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7317a later state.
7318
7319@cindex LAC
7320@c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7321@c sentence from being rejected.
7322While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7323incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7324effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7325anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7326be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7327syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7328@end itemize
7329
7330For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7331is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7332no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7333action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7334because the accept action ends the parse.
7335
7336For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7337default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7338action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7339delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7340from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7341cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7342versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7343GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7344token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7345split the parse instead.
7346
7347To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7348@code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7349
7350@deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7351Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7352The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7353@itemize
7354@item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7355@item @code{consistent}
7356@item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7357@end itemize
7358
7359(The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7360experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7361@end deffn
7362
7363@node LAC
7364@subsection LAC
7365@findex %define parse.lac
7366@cindex LAC
7367@cindex lookahead correction
7368
7369Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7370encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7371parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7372reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7373they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7374in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7375encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7376Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7377contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7378
7379The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7380in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7381merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7382Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7383reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7384
7385LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7386that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7387sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7388enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7389
7390@deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7391Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7392@itemize
7393@item @code{none} (default)
7394@item @code{full}
7395@end itemize
7396(This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7397it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7398C.)
7399@end deffn
7400
7401Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7402fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7403parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7404exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7405During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7406actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7407then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7408an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7409error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7410expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7411in the grammar.
7412
7413There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7414parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7415a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7416next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7417consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7418detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7419token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7420determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7421intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7422while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7423
7424Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7425default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7426exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7427unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7428language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7429LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7430language-recognition power.
7431
7432There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7433
7434@itemize
7435@item Infinite parsing loops.
7436
7437IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7438parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7439parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7440it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7441does.
7442
7443@item Verbose error message limitations.
7444
7445Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7446limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7447verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7448limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7449increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7450course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7451
7452@item Performance.
7453
7454Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7455performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7456twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7457states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7458parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7459file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7460semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7461parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7462parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7463never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7464has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7465@end itemize
7466
7467While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7468parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7469@pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7470
7471@node Unreachable States
7472@subsection Unreachable States
7473@findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7474@cindex unreachable states
7475
7476If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7477some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7478state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7479disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7480
7481By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7482resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7483keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7484relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7485
7486@deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7487Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7488@var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7489@end deffn
7490
7491There are a few caveats to consider:
7492
7493@itemize @bullet
7494@item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7495
7496Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7497other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7498irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7499relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7500parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7501behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7502
7503@item Other useless states.
7504
7505While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7506remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7507reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7508useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7509to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7510it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7511However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7512@end itemize
7513
7514@node Generalized LR Parsing
7515@section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7516@cindex GLR parsing
7517@cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7518@cindex ambiguous grammars
7519@cindex nondeterministic parsing
7520
7521Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7522when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7523based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7524As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7525context-free languages.
7526Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7527sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7528The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7529lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7530decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7531Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7532there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7533summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7534
7535When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7536Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7537Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7538parser uses the same basic
7539algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7540differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7541been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7542reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7543situation, it
7544effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7545shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7546tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7547and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7548a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7549
7550In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7551is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7552the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7553actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7554immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7555get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7556their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7557results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7558when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7559and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7560grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7561stream.
7562
7563Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7564states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7565algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7566At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7567values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7568parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7569has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7570declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7571precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7572rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7573Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7574the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7575
7576It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7577permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7578size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7579LR(1)) grammar in
7580quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7581context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7582uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7583length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7584prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7585grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7586behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7587Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7588doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7589structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7590grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7591deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7592
7593For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
75942000}.
7595
7596@node Memory Management
7597@section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7598@cindex memory exhaustion
7599@cindex memory management
7600@cindex stack overflow
7601@cindex parser stack overflow
7602@cindex overflow of parser stack
7603
7604The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7605not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7606calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7607
7608Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7609usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7610recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7611
7612@vindex YYMAXDEPTH
7613By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7614parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7615macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7616of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7617
7618The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7619large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7620stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7621increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7622you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7623space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7624
7625However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7626arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7627space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7628@code{YYINITDEPTH}.
7629
7630@cindex default stack limit
7631The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
763210000.
7633
7634@vindex YYINITDEPTH
7635You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7636macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7637parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7638unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7639that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7640
7641Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7642
7643@c FIXME: C++ output.
7644Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7645parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7646by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7647suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7648this deficiency in a future release.
7649
7650@node Error Recovery
7651@chapter Error Recovery
7652@cindex error recovery
7653@cindex recovery from errors
7654
7655It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7656error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7657rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7658another expression.
7659
7660In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7661be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7662caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7663@code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7664forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7665deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7666to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7667
7668@findex error
7669You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7670recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7671is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7672handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7673syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7674in the current context, the parse can continue.
7675
7676For example:
7677
7678@example
7679stmts:
7680 /* empty string */
7681| stmts '\n'
7682| stmts exp '\n'
7683| stmts error '\n'
7684@end example
7685
7686The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7687makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
7688
7689What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7690error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7691of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7692the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7693and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
7694will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7695applicable in the ordinary way.
7696
7697But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7698the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7699and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7700@code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7701already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
7702At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7703lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7704tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7705this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7706that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7707possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7708Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7709
7710The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7711error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7712the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7713
7714@example
7715stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7716@end example
7717
7718It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7719opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7720close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7721spurious error message:
7722
7723@example
7724primary:
7725 '(' expr ')'
7726| '(' error ')'
7727@dots{}
7728;
7729@end example
7730
7731Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7732one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7733recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7734@code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7735middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7736from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7737since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7738@code{stmt}.
7739
7740To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7741message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7742after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7743error messages resume.
7744
7745Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7746as any other rules can.
7747
7748@findex yyerrok
7749You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7750@code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7751error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7752@samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7753
7754@findex yyclearin
7755The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7756this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7757this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7758action.
7759@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7760
7761For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7762called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7763once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7764probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7765with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7766
7767@vindex YYRECOVERING
7768The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7769is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7770Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7771error.
7772
7773@node Context Dependency
7774@chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7775
7776The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7777syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7778its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7779(known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7780languages.
7781
7782@menu
7783* Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7784* Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7785* Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7786 error recovery rules must be written.
7787@end menu
7788
7789(Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7790neither clean nor robust.)
7791
7792@node Semantic Tokens
7793@section Semantic Info in Token Types
7794
7795The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7796depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7797
7798@example
7799foo (x);
7800@end example
7801
7802This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7803name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7804parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7805
7806The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7807@code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7808identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7809to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7810declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7811
7812The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7813token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7814but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7815@code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7816is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7817typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7818accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7819
7820This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7821identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7822parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7823redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7824earlier:
7825
7826@example
7827typedef int foo, bar;
7828int baz (void)
7829@group
7830@{
7831 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7832 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7833 return foo (bar);
7834@}
7835@end group
7836@end example
7837
7838Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7839construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7840
7841As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7842all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7843which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7844declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7845duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7846
7847@example
7848@group
7849initdcl:
7850 declarator maybeasm '=' init
7851| declarator maybeasm
7852;
7853@end group
7854
7855@group
7856notype_initdcl:
7857 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
7858| notype_declarator maybeasm
7859;
7860@end group
7861@end example
7862
7863@noindent
7864Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7865cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7866@code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7867
7868There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7869(described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7870changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7871here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7872program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7873the syntactic context.
7874
7875@node Lexical Tie-ins
7876@section Lexical Tie-ins
7877@cindex lexical tie-in
7878
7879One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7880which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7881parsed.
7882
7883For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7884construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7885an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7886particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7887as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7888
7889@example
7890@group
7891%@{
7892 int hexflag;
7893 int yylex (void);
7894 void yyerror (char const *);
7895%@}
7896%%
7897@dots{}
7898@end group
7899@group
7900expr:
7901 IDENTIFIER
7902| constant
7903| HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
7904 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
7905| expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7906@dots{}
7907;
7908@end group
7909
7910@group
7911constant:
7912 INTEGER
7913| STRING
7914;
7915@end group
7916@end example
7917
7918@noindent
7919Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7920it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7921with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7922
7923The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7924file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7925,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7926the flag.
7927
7928@node Tie-in Recovery
7929@section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7930
7931Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7932@xref{Error Recovery}.
7933
7934The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7935abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7936For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7937tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7938
7939@example
7940stmt:
7941 expr ';'
7942| IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7943@dots{}
7944| error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
7945;
7946@end example
7947
7948If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7949construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7950completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7951remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7952keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7953
7954To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7955
7956There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7957For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7958and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7959
7960@example
7961@group
7962expr:
7963 @dots{}
7964| '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
7965| '(' error ')'
7966@dots{}
7967@end group
7968@end example
7969
7970If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7971that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7972the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7973the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7974
7975What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7976@code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7977way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7978being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7979make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7980be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7981clear the flag.
7982
7983@c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7984
7985@node Debugging
7986@chapter Debugging Your Parser
7987
7988Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
7989the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
7990chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
7991automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
7992
7993@menu
7994* Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7995* Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7996@end menu
7997
7998@node Understanding
7999@section Understanding Your Parser
8000
8001As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8002Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8003frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8004tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8005representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8006
8007The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8008@option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
8009Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8010the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8011instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8012parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8013a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8014
8015The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8016
8017@example
8018%token NUM STR
8019%left '+' '-'
8020%left '*'
8021%%
8022exp:
8023 exp '+' exp
8024| exp '-' exp
8025| exp '*' exp
8026| exp '/' exp
8027| NUM
8028;
8029useless: STR;
8030%%
8031@end example
8032
8033@command{bison} reports:
8034
8035@example
8036calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8037calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8038calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8039calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8040calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8041@end example
8042
8043When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8044creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8045order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8046interpretation is the same.
8047
8048@noindent
8049@cindex token, useless
8050@cindex useless token
8051@cindex nonterminal, useless
8052@cindex useless nonterminal
8053@cindex rule, useless
8054@cindex useless rule
8055The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8056nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8057useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8058the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8059
8060@example
8061Nonterminals useless in grammar
8062 useless
8063
8064Terminals unused in grammar
8065 STR
8066
8067Rules useless in grammar
8068 6 useless: STR
8069@end example
8070
8071@noindent
8072The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8073
8074@example
8075State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8076State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8077State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8078State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8079@end example
8080
8081@noindent
8082Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8083
8084@example
8085Grammar
8086
8087 0 $accept: exp $end
8088
8089 1 exp: exp '+' exp
8090 2 | exp '-' exp
8091 3 | exp '*' exp
8092 4 | exp '/' exp
8093 5 | NUM
8094@end example
8095
8096@noindent
8097and reports the uses of the symbols:
8098
8099@example
8100@group
8101Terminals, with rules where they appear
8102
8103$end (0) 0
8104'*' (42) 3
8105'+' (43) 1
8106'-' (45) 2
8107'/' (47) 4
8108error (256)
8109NUM (258) 5
8110STR (259)
8111@end group
8112
8113@group
8114Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8115
8116$accept (9)
8117 on left: 0
8118exp (10)
8119 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8120@end group
8121@end example
8122
8123@noindent
8124@cindex item
8125@cindex pointed rule
8126@cindex rule, pointed
8127Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8128with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8129item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8130the location of the input cursor.
8131
8132@example
8133state 0
8134
8135 0 $accept: . exp $end
8136
8137 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8138
8139 exp go to state 2
8140@end example
8141
8142This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8143beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8144symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8145after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8146flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8147symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8148the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8149lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8150
8151@cindex core, item set
8152@cindex item set core
8153@cindex kernel, item set
8154@cindex item set core
8155Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8156report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8157at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8158reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8159you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8160@option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8161
8162@example
8163state 0
8164
8165 0 $accept: . exp $end
8166 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8167 2 | . exp '-' exp
8168 3 | . exp '*' exp
8169 4 | . exp '/' exp
8170 5 | . NUM
8171
8172 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8173
8174 exp go to state 2
8175@end example
8176
8177@noindent
8178In the state 1@dots{}
8179
8180@example
8181state 1
8182
8183 5 exp: NUM .
8184
8185 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8186@end example
8187
8188@noindent
8189the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8190(@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8191state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8192jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8193
8194@example
8195state 2
8196
8197 0 $accept: exp . $end
8198 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8199 2 | exp . '-' exp
8200 3 | exp . '*' exp
8201 4 | exp . '/' exp
8202
8203 $end shift, and go to state 3
8204 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8205 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8206 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8207 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8208@end example
8209
8210@noindent
8211In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8212because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8213@samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8214jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8215Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8216error.
8217
8218@cindex accepting state
8219The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8220state}:
8221
8222@example
8223state 3
8224
8225 0 $accept: exp $end .
8226
8227 $default accept
8228@end example
8229
8230@noindent
8231the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8232read), the parsing exits successfully.
8233
8234The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8235the reader.
8236
8237@example
8238state 4
8239
8240 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8241
8242 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8243
8244 exp go to state 8
8245
8246
8247state 5
8248
8249 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8250
8251 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8252
8253 exp go to state 9
8254
8255
8256state 6
8257
8258 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8259
8260 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8261
8262 exp go to state 10
8263
8264
8265state 7
8266
8267 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8268
8269 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8270
8271 exp go to state 11
8272@end example
8273
8274As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
82751 shift/reduce}:
8276
8277@example
8278state 8
8279
8280 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8281 1 | exp '+' exp .
8282 2 | exp . '-' exp
8283 3 | exp . '*' exp
8284 4 | exp . '/' exp
8285
8286 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8287 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8288
8289 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8290 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8291@end example
8292
8293Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8294either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8295conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8296information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8297ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8298sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8299NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8300NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8301
8302Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8303arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8304Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8305square brackets.
8306
8307Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8308shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8309reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8310@emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8311possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8312one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8313is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8314the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8315lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8316precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8317with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8318@option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8319
8320@example
8321state 8
8322
8323 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8324 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8325 2 | exp . '-' exp
8326 3 | exp . '*' exp
8327 4 | exp . '/' exp
8328
8329 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8330 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8331
8332 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8333 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8334@end example
8335
8336Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8337the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8338solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8339@option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8340conflicts in the report:
8341
8342@example
8343Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8344Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8345Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8346@end example
8347
8348
8349The remaining states are similar:
8350
8351@example
8352@group
8353state 9
8354
8355 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8356 2 | exp . '-' exp
8357 2 | exp '-' exp .
8358 3 | exp . '*' exp
8359 4 | exp . '/' exp
8360
8361 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8362 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8363
8364 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8365 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8366@end group
8367
8368@group
8369state 10
8370
8371 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8372 2 | exp . '-' exp
8373 3 | exp . '*' exp
8374 3 | exp '*' exp .
8375 4 | exp . '/' exp
8376
8377 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8378
8379 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8380 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8381@end group
8382
8383@group
8384state 11
8385
8386 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8387 2 | exp . '-' exp
8388 3 | exp . '*' exp
8389 4 | exp . '/' exp
8390 4 | exp '/' exp .
8391
8392 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8393 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8394 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8395 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8396
8397 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8398 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8399 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8400 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8401 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8402@end group
8403@end example
8404
8405@noindent
8406Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8407precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8408@samp{*}, but also because the
8409associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8410
8411
8412@node Tracing
8413@section Tracing Your Parser
8414@findex yydebug
8415@cindex debugging
8416@cindex tracing the parser
8417
8418When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8419@code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8420
8421@menu
8422* Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8423* Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8424* The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8425@end menu
8426
8427@node Enabling Traces
8428@subsection Enabling Traces
8429There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8430
8431@table @asis
8432@item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8433@findex YYDEBUG
8434Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8435parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8436@samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8437YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8438Prologue}).
8439
8440@item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8441Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8442,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8443
8444@item the directive @samp{%debug}
8445@findex %debug
8446Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8447Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8448useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8449preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8450you, this is
8451the preferred solution.
8452@end table
8453
8454We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8455always possible.
8456
8457@findex YYFPRINTF
8458The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8459@code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8460@var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8461arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8462define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8463and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8464
8465Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8466request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8467You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8468you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8469
8470Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8471line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8472messages tell you these things:
8473
8474@itemize @bullet
8475@item
8476Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8477
8478@item
8479Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8480state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8481
8482@item
8483Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8484of the state stack afterward.
8485@end itemize
8486
8487To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
8488description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
8489This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8490positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8491possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8492can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8493the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8494something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8495grammar are to blame.
8496
8497The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
8498debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8499parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8500the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8501of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8502
8503@node Mfcalc Traces
8504@subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
8505
8506The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
8507but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
8508how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
8509Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
8510use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
8511Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
8512
8513As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
8514calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
8515traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
8516prologue:
8517
8518@comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
8519@example
8520/* Generate the parser description file. */
8521%verbose
8522/* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
8523%define parse.trace
8524
8525/* Formatting semantic values. */
8526%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
8527%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
8528%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
8529@end example
8530
8531The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
8532support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
8533@code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
8534will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
8535creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
8536ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
8537
8538The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
8539semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
8540either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
8541tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
8542printer will be used for them.
8543
8544Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
8545are sent onto standard error.
8546
8547@example
8548$ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
8549Starting parse
8550Entering state 0
8551Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
8552-> $$ = nterm input ()
8553Stack now 0
8554Entering state 1
8555@end example
8556
8557@noindent
8558This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
8559(which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
8560to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
8561a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
8562
8563Then the parser calls the scanner.
8564@example
8565Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
8566Shifting token FNCT (sin())
8567Entering state 6
8568@end example
8569
8570@noindent
8571That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
8572@samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
8573The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
8574something about it.
8575
8576@example
8577Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
8578Shifting token '(' ()
8579Entering state 14
8580Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8581Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8582Entering state 4
8583Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8584 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8585-> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8586Stack now 0 1 6 14
8587Entering state 24
8588@end example
8589
8590@noindent
8591The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
8592@code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
8593@code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
8594
8595@example
8596Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
8597Shifting token '-' ()
8598Entering state 17
8599Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8600Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8601Entering state 4
8602Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8603 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8604-> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8605Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
8606Entering state 26
8607Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
8608Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
8609 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8610 $2 = token '-' ()
8611 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8612-> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8613Stack now 0 1 6 14
8614Entering state 24
8615@end example
8616
8617@noindent
8618The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
8619discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
8620
8621@example
8622Next token is token ')' ()
8623Shifting token ')' ()
8624Entering state 31
8625Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
8626 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
8627 $2 = token '(' ()
8628 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8629 $4 = token ')' ()
8630-> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8631Stack now 0 1
8632Entering state 11
8633@end example
8634
8635@noindent
8636Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
8637display its result.
8638
8639@example
8640Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
8641Shifting token '\n' ()
8642Entering state 22
8643Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
8644 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8645 $2 = token '\n' ()
8646@result{} 0
8647-> $$ = nterm line ()
8648Stack now 0 1
8649Entering state 10
8650Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
8651 $1 = nterm input ()
8652 $2 = nterm line ()
8653-> $$ = nterm input ()
8654Stack now 0
8655Entering state 1
8656@end example
8657
8658The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
8659expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
8660completion of the parsing.
8661
8662@example
8663Reading a token: Now at end of input.
8664Shifting token $end ()
8665Entering state 2
8666Stack now 0 1 2
8667Cleanup: popping token $end ()
8668Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
8669@end example
8670
8671
8672@node The YYPRINT Macro
8673@subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
8674
8675@findex YYPRINT
8676Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
8677@code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
8678the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
8679
8680@deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
8681@findex YYPRINT
8682If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
8683will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
8684the token value (from @code{yylval}).
8685
8686For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
8687@end deffn
8688
8689Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8690calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8691
8692@example
8693%@{
8694 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8695 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
8696 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
8697%@}
8698
8699@dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8700
8701static void
8702print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8703@{
8704 if (type == VAR)
8705 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8706 else if (type == NUM)
8707 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8708@}
8709@end example
8710
8711@c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8712
8713@node Invocation
8714@chapter Invoking Bison
8715@cindex invoking Bison
8716@cindex Bison invocation
8717@cindex options for invoking Bison
8718
8719The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8720
8721@example
8722bison @var{infile}
8723@end example
8724
8725Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8726@samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8727the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8728Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8729the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8730also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8731grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8732output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8733(respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8734feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8735@samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8736
8737For example :
8738
8739@example
8740bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8741@end example
8742@noindent
8743will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8744
8745@example
8746bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8747@end example
8748@noindent
8749will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8750
8751For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8752distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8753invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8754
8755@menu
8756* Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8757 in alphabetical order by short options.
8758* Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8759* Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8760@end menu
8761
8762@node Bison Options
8763@section Bison Options
8764
8765Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8766option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8767@samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8768are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8769@samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8770@samp{=}.
8771
8772Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8773short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8774option.
8775
8776@c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8777@noindent
8778Operations modes:
8779@table @option
8780@item -h
8781@itemx --help
8782Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8783
8784@item -V
8785@itemx --version
8786Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8787
8788@item --print-localedir
8789Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8790
8791@item --print-datadir
8792Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8793
8794@item -y
8795@itemx --yacc
8796Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8797diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8798ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8799so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8800the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8801Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8802@code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8803token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8804substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8805for compatibility with POSIX:
8806
8807@example
8808#! /bin/sh
8809bison -y "$@@"
8810@end example
8811
8812The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8813traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8814like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8815this option is specified.
8816
8817@item -W [@var{category}]
8818@itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8819Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8820of:
8821@table @code
8822@item midrule-values
8823Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8824of the parent rule.
8825For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8826
8827@example
8828exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8829@end example
8830
8831Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8832For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8833
8834@example
8835exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8836@end example
8837
8838These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8839be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8840@code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8841
8842@item yacc
8843Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8844
8845@item conflicts-sr
8846@itemx conflicts-rr
8847S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8848the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8849unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8850conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8851no effect on the conflict report.
8852
8853@item other
8854All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8855
8856This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8857releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8858categories.
8859
8860@item all
8861All the warnings.
8862@item none
8863Turn off all the warnings.
8864@item error
8865Treat warnings as errors.
8866@end table
8867
8868A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8869instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8870POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8871@end table
8872
8873@noindent
8874Tuning the parser:
8875
8876@table @option
8877@item -t
8878@itemx --debug
8879In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
88801 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8881compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8882
8883@item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8884@itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8885@itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8886@itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8887Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8888(@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8889definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8890
8891@itemize
8892@item
8893Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8894the last.
8895@item
8896If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8897@code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8898definition for @var{name}.
8899@item
8900If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8901@code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8902definitions for @var{name}.
8903@item
8904Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8905definitions for @var{name}.
8906@end itemize
8907
8908You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8909make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8910any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8911
8912@item -L @var{language}
8913@itemx --language=@var{language}
8914Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8915@code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8916Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8917@var{language} is case-insensitive.
8918
8919This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8920releases.
8921
8922@item --locations
8923Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8924
8925@item -p @var{prefix}
8926@itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8927Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8928@xref{Decl Summary}.
8929
8930@item -l
8931@itemx --no-lines
8932Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8933implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8934implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8935associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8936causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8937treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8938
8939@item -S @var{file}
8940@itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8941Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8942(@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8943
8944@c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8945@c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8946@c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8947@c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8948
8949If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8950file in the Bison installation directory.
8951If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8952current working directory.
8953This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8954
8955@item -k
8956@itemx --token-table
8957Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8958@end table
8959
8960@noindent
8961Adjust the output:
8962
8963@table @option
8964@item --defines[=@var{file}]
8965Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8966file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8967the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8968
8969@item -d
8970This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8971@var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8972with other short options.
8973
8974@item -b @var{file-prefix}
8975@itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8976Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8977for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8978
8979@item -r @var{things}
8980@itemx --report=@var{things}
8981Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8982separated list of @var{things} among:
8983
8984@table @code
8985@item state
8986Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8987parser's automaton.
8988
8989@item lookahead
8990Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8991each rule's lookahead set.
8992
8993@item itemset
8994Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8995the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8996@end table
8997
8998@item --report-file=@var{file}
8999Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9000
9001@item -v
9002@itemx --verbose
9003Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9004file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9005parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9006
9007@item -o @var{file}
9008@itemx --output=@var{file}
9009Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9010
9011The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9012described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9013
9014@item -g [@var{file}]
9015@itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9016Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9017automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9018@uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9019@code{@var{file}} is optional.
9020If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9021@file{foo.dot}.
9022
9023@item -x [@var{file}]
9024@itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9025Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9026@code{@var{file}} is optional.
9027If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9028@file{foo.xml}.
9029(The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9030More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9031@end table
9032
9033@node Option Cross Key
9034@section Option Cross Key
9035
9036Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9037the corresponding short option and directive.
9038
9039@multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9040@headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9041@include cross-options.texi
9042@end multitable
9043
9044@node Yacc Library
9045@section Yacc Library
9046
9047The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9048@code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9049implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9050them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9051@option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9052library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9053Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9054
9055If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9056declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9057
9058@example
9059int yyerror (char const *);
9060@end example
9061
9062Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9063If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9064@code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9065
9066@example
9067int yyparse (void);
9068@end example
9069
9070@c ================================================= C++ Bison
9071
9072@node Other Languages
9073@chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9074
9075@menu
9076* C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9077* Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9078@end menu
9079
9080@node C++ Parsers
9081@section C++ Parsers
9082
9083@menu
9084* C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9085* C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9086* C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9087* C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9088* C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9089* A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9090@end menu
9091
9092@node C++ Bison Interface
9093@subsection C++ Bison Interface
9094@c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9095@c - Always pure
9096@c - initial action
9097
9098The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9099@samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9100@option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9101@xref{Decl Summary}.
9102
9103When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9104namespace.
9105@findex %define namespace
9106Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
9107name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
9108generated in the following files:
9109
9110@table @file
9111@item position.hh
9112@itemx location.hh
9113The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
9114used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9115
9116@item stack.hh
9117An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9118
9119@item @var{file}.hh
9120@itemx @var{file}.cc
9121(Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9122declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9123and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9124parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9125
9126The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9127@option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9128@samp{%defines} directive.
9129@end table
9130
9131All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9132for a complete and accurate documentation.
9133
9134@node C++ Semantic Values
9135@subsection C++ Semantic Values
9136@c - No objects in unions
9137@c - YYSTYPE
9138@c - Printer and destructor
9139
9140The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9141Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9142@code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
9143within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
9144alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9145@itemize @minus
9146@item
9147The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9148you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9149@code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9150@item
9151Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9152instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9153to such objects are allowed.
9154@end itemize
9155
9156Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9157reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9158only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9159Symbols}.
9160
9161
9162@node C++ Location Values
9163@subsection C++ Location Values
9164@c - %locations
9165@c - class Position
9166@c - class Location
9167@c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9168
9169When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9170location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
9171define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
9172range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
9173files).
9174
9175@tindex uint
9176In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9177genuine code only the latter is used.
9178
9179@menu
9180* C++ position:: One point in the source file
9181* C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9182@end menu
9183
9184@node C++ position
9185@subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9186
9187@deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9188Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9189not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9190handled elsewhere.
9191@end deftypeop
9192
9193@deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9194Reset the position to the given values.
9195@end deftypemethod
9196
9197@deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9198The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9199parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9200feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9201filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9202@end deftypeivar
9203
9204@deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9205The line, starting at 1.
9206@end deftypeivar
9207
9208@deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9209Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9210@end deftypemethod
9211
9212@deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9213The column, starting at 1.
9214@end deftypeivar
9215
9216@deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9217Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9218@end deftypemethod
9219
9220@deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9221@deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9222@deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9223@deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9224Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9225@end deftypemethod
9226
9227@deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9228@deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9229Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9230@end deftypemethod
9231
9232@deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9233Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9234@samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9235@samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9236@end deftypefun
9237
9238@node C++ location
9239@subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9240
9241@deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9242Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9243@end deftypeop
9244
9245@deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9246@deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9247Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9248@end deftypeop
9249
9250@deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9251Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9252@end deftypemethod
9253
9254@deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9255@deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9256The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9257@end deftypeivar
9258
9259@deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9260@deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9261Advance the @code{end} position.
9262@end deftypemethod
9263
9264@deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9265@deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9266@deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9267Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9268@end deftypemethod
9269
9270@deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9271Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9272@end deftypemethod
9273
9274@deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9275@deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9276Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9277positions.
9278@end deftypemethod
9279
9280@deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9281Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9282@code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9283@end deftypefun
9284
9285@node C++ Parser Interface
9286@subsection C++ Parser Interface
9287@c - define parser_class_name
9288@c - Ctor
9289@c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9290@c debug_stream.
9291@c - Reporting errors
9292
9293The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9294declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9295class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9296@samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9297this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9298@code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9299it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9300additional argument for its constructor.
9301
9302@defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9303@defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9304The types for semantics value and locations.
9305@end defcv
9306
9307@defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9308A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9309defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9310use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9311@samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9312(@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9313@end defcv
9314
9315@deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9316Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9317@samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9318@end deftypemethod
9319
9320@deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9321Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9322@end deftypemethod
9323
9324@deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9325@deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9326Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9327@code{std::cerr}.
9328@end deftypemethod
9329
9330@deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9331@deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9332Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9333or nonzero, full tracing.
9334@end deftypemethod
9335
9336@deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9337The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9338the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9339described by @var{m}.
9340@end deftypemethod
9341
9342
9343@node C++ Scanner Interface
9344@subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9345@c - prefix for yylex.
9346@c - Pure interface to yylex
9347@c - %lex-param
9348
9349The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9350parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9351@code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9352
9353@deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9354Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9355value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9356@samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9357@end deftypemethod
9358
9359
9360@node A Complete C++ Example
9361@subsection A Complete C++ Example
9362
9363This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9364complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9365ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9366focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9367classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9368We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9369demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
9370actually easier to interface with.
9371
9372@menu
9373* Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9374* Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9375* Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9376* Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9377* Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9378@end menu
9379
9380@node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9381@subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9382
9383Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9384expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9385environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9386@code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9387of valid input follows.
9388
9389@example
9390three := 3
9391seven := one + two * three
9392seven * seven
9393@end example
9394
9395@node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9396@subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9397@c - An env
9398@c - A place to store error messages
9399@c - A place for the result
9400
9401To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9402technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9403containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9404launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9405the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9406transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9407@dfn{parsing driver} class.
9408
9409The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9410follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9411required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9412class.
9413
9414@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9415@example
9416#ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9417# define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9418# include <string>
9419# include <map>
9420# include "calc++-parser.hh"
9421@end example
9422
9423
9424@noindent
9425Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9426the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9427@code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9428factor both as follows.
9429
9430@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9431@example
9432// Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9433# define YY_DECL \
9434 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9435 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9436 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9437 calcxx_driver& driver)
9438// ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9439YY_DECL;
9440@end example
9441
9442@noindent
9443The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9444members.
9445
9446@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9447@example
9448// Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9449class calcxx_driver
9450@{
9451public:
9452 calcxx_driver ();
9453 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9454
9455 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9456
9457 int result;
9458@end example
9459
9460@noindent
9461To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9462have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9463
9464@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9465@example
9466 // Handling the scanner.
9467 void scan_begin ();
9468 void scan_end ();
9469 bool trace_scanning;
9470@end example
9471
9472@noindent
9473Similarly for the parser itself.
9474
9475@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9476@example
9477 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9478 int parse (const std::string& f);
9479 std::string file;
9480 bool trace_parsing;
9481@end example
9482
9483@noindent
9484To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9485dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9486compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9487close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9488
9489@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9490@example
9491 // Error handling.
9492 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9493 void error (const std::string& m);
9494@};
9495#endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9496@end example
9497
9498The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9499member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9500are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9501messages and set error state.
9502
9503@comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9504@example
9505#include "calc++-driver.hh"
9506#include "calc++-parser.hh"
9507
9508calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9509 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9510@{
9511 variables["one"] = 1;
9512 variables["two"] = 2;
9513@}
9514
9515calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9516@{
9517@}
9518
9519int
9520calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9521@{
9522 file = f;
9523 scan_begin ();
9524 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9525 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9526 int res = parser.parse ();
9527 scan_end ();
9528 return res;
9529@}
9530
9531void
9532calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9533@{
9534 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9535@}
9536
9537void
9538calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9539@{
9540 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9541@}
9542@end example
9543
9544@node Calc++ Parser
9545@subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9546
9547The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9548deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9549and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9550changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9551the grammar for.
9552
9553@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9554@example
9555%skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9556%require "@value{VERSION}"
9557%defines
9558%define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9559@end example
9560
9561@noindent
9562@findex %code requires
9563Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9564@code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9565reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9566driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9567particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9568use a forward declaration of the driver.
9569@xref{%code Summary}.
9570
9571@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9572@example
9573%code requires @{
9574# include <string>
9575class calcxx_driver;
9576@}
9577@end example
9578
9579@noindent
9580The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9581This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9582global variables.
9583
9584@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9585@example
9586// The parsing context.
9587%parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9588%lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9589@end example
9590
9591@noindent
9592Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9593first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9594relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9595automatically propagated.
9596
9597@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9598@example
9599%locations
9600%initial-action
9601@{
9602 // Initialize the initial location.
9603 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9604@};
9605@end example
9606
9607@noindent
9608Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9609messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9610(@pxref{LAC}).
9611
9612@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9613@example
9614%debug
9615%error-verbose
9616@end example
9617
9618@noindent
9619Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9620them.
9621
9622@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9623@example
9624// Symbols.
9625%union
9626@{
9627 int ival;
9628 std::string *sval;
9629@};
9630@end example
9631
9632@noindent
9633@findex %code
9634The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9635@file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9636
9637@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9638@example
9639%code @{
9640# include "calc++-driver.hh"
9641@}
9642@end example
9643
9644
9645@noindent
9646The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9647allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9648of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9649symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
9650avoid name clashes.
9651
9652@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9653@example
9654%token END 0 "end of file"
9655%token ASSIGN ":="
9656%token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9657%token <ival> NUMBER "number"
9658%type <ival> exp
9659@end example
9660
9661@noindent
9662To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9663@code{%destructor}.
9664
9665@c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9666@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9667@example
9668%printer @{ yyoutput << *$$; @} "identifier"
9669%destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9670
9671%printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <ival>
9672@end example
9673
9674@noindent
9675The grammar itself is straightforward.
9676
9677@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9678@example
9679%%
9680%start unit;
9681unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9682
9683assignments:
9684 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
9685| assignments assignment @{@};
9686
9687assignment:
9688 "identifier" ":=" exp
9689 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9690
9691%left '+' '-';
9692%left '*' '/';
9693exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9694 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9695 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9696 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9697 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9698 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9699%%
9700@end example
9701
9702@noindent
9703Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9704driver.
9705
9706@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9707@example
9708void
9709yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9710 const std::string& m)
9711@{
9712 driver.error (l, m);
9713@}
9714@end example
9715
9716@node Calc++ Scanner
9717@subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9718
9719The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9720parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9721
9722@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9723@example
9724%@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9725# include <cstdlib>
9726# include <cerrno>
9727# include <climits>
9728# include <string>
9729# include "calc++-driver.hh"
9730# include "calc++-parser.hh"
9731
9732/* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9733 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9734 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9735 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9736# undef yywrap
9737# define yywrap() 1
9738
9739/* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9740 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9741 not of token_type. */
9742#define yyterminate() return token::END
9743%@}
9744@end example
9745
9746@noindent
9747Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9748@code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9749actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9750Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9751
9752@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9753@example
9754%option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9755@end example
9756
9757@noindent
9758Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9759
9760@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9761@example
9762id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9763int [0-9]+
9764blank [ \t]
9765@end example
9766
9767@noindent
9768The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9769time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9770position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9771advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9772cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9773is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9774preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9775
9776@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9777@example
9778@group
9779%@{
9780# define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9781%@}
9782@end group
9783%%
9784%@{
9785 yylloc->step ();
9786%@}
9787@{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9788[\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9789@end example
9790
9791@noindent
9792The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9793It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9794@code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9795@code{token::identifier} for instance.
9796
9797@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9798@example
9799%@{
9800 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9801%@}
9802 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9803[-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9804":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9805@{int@} @{
9806 errno = 0;
9807 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9808 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9809 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9810 yylval->ival = n;
9811 return token::NUMBER;
9812@}
9813@{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9814. driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9815%%
9816@end example
9817
9818@noindent
9819Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9820on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9821
9822@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9823@example
9824@group
9825void
9826calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9827@{
9828 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9829 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
9830 yyin = stdin;
9831 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9832 @{
9833 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9834 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
9835 @}
9836@}
9837@end group
9838
9839@group
9840void
9841calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9842@{
9843 fclose (yyin);
9844@}
9845@end group
9846@end example
9847
9848@node Calc++ Top Level
9849@subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9850
9851The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9852
9853@comment file: calc++.cc
9854@example
9855#include <iostream>
9856#include "calc++-driver.hh"
9857
9858@group
9859int
9860main (int argc, char *argv[])
9861@{
9862 calcxx_driver driver;
9863 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
9864 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
9865 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9866 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
9867 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9868 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
9869 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9870@}
9871@end group
9872@end example
9873
9874@node Java Parsers
9875@section Java Parsers
9876
9877@menu
9878* Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9879* Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9880* Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9881* Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9882* Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9883* Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9884* Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9885* Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9886@end menu
9887
9888@node Java Bison Interface
9889@subsection Java Bison Interface
9890@c - %language "Java"
9891
9892(The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9893More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9894
9895The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9896directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9897
9898@c FIXME: Documented bug.
9899When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9900create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9901containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9902@file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9903implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9904directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9905entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9906@code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9907The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9908
9909You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9910
9911Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9912state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9913Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9914and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9915Java.
9916
9917Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9918api.push-pull} have no effect.
9919
9920GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9921@code{glr-parser} directive.
9922
9923No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9924@code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9925
9926@c FIXME: Possible code change.
9927Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9928in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9929@option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9930options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9931unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9932@code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9933@code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9934access the token names and codes.
9935
9936@node Java Semantic Values
9937@subsection Java Semantic Values
9938@c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9939@c - YYSTYPE
9940@c - Printer and destructor
9941
9942There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9943semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9944@code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9945
9946@example
9947%type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9948%type <Integer> number
9949@end example
9950
9951By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9952which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9953To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9954superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9955directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9956
9957@example
9958%define stype "ASTNode"
9959@end example
9960
9961@noindent
9962any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9963is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9964
9965@c FIXME: Documented bug.
9966Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9967Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9968that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9969Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9970implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9971
9972Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9973adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9974to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9975
9976Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9977can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9978(in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9979
9980
9981@node Java Location Values
9982@subsection Java Location Values
9983@c - %locations
9984@c - class Position
9985@c - class Location
9986
9987When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
9988location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
9989class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
9990defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9991positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
9992class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
9993renamed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9994
9995The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9996By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9997with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9998be supplied by the user.
9999
10000
10001@deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10002@deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10003The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10004@end deftypeivar
10005
10006@deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10007Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10008@end deftypeop
10009
10010@deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10011Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10012@end deftypeop
10013
10014@deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10015Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10016properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10017@code{toString} methods appropriately.
10018@end deftypemethod
10019
10020
10021@node Java Parser Interface
10022@subsection Java Parser Interface
10023@c - define parser_class_name
10024@c - Ctor
10025@c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10026@c debug_stream.
10027@c - Reporting errors
10028
10029The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10030@code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10031or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10032@code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10033the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10034
10035By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10036@code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10037according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10038file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10039use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10040@code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10041
10042The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10043@code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10044interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10045extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
10046
10047The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10048for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10049interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10050these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10051below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10052@code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10053
10054@c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
10055@c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
10056
10057The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10058directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10059final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10060which initialize them automatically.
10061
10062Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
10063name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
10064
10065@deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10066Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10067no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
10068used.
10069@end deftypeop
10070
10071@deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10072Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10073additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
10074
10075If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10076declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10077created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
10078@end deftypeop
10079
10080@deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10081Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10082@code{false} otherwise.
10083@end deftypemethod
10084
10085@deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10086During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10087from a syntax error.
10088@xref{Error Recovery}.
10089@end deftypemethod
10090
10091@deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10092@deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10093Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10094@code{System.err}.
10095@end deftypemethod
10096
10097@deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10098@deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10099Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10100or nonzero, full tracing.
10101@end deftypemethod
10102
10103
10104@node Java Scanner Interface
10105@subsection Java Scanner Interface
10106@c - %code lexer
10107@c - %lex-param
10108@c - Lexer interface
10109
10110There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10111with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10112defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10113@code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
10114
10115In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10116@code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10117parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10118@code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10119constructor.
10120
10121In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10122which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10123The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10124implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10125case.
10126
10127In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10128
10129@deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10130This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10131parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10132changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
10133@end deftypemethod
10134
10135@deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10136Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10137value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10138interface.
10139
10140Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10141Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10142@end deftypemethod
10143
10144@deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10145@deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10146Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10147@code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10148methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10149
10150The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
10151"@var{class-name}".}
10152@end deftypemethod
10153
10154@deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10155Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10156
10157The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
10158"@var{class-name}".}
10159@end deftypemethod
10160
10161
10162@node Java Action Features
10163@subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10164
10165The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10166Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10167
10168Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10169actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10170
10171@defvar $@var{n}
10172The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10173This may not be assigned to.
10174@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10175@end defvar
10176
10177@defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10178Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10179@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10180@end defvar
10181
10182@defvar $$
10183The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10184value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10185@code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10186casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10187Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10188@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10189@end defvar
10190
10191@defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10192Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10193Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10194for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10195these constructs.
10196@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10197@end defvar
10198
10199@defvar @@@var{n}
10200The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10201This may not be assigned to.
10202@xref{Java Location Values}.
10203@end defvar
10204
10205@defvar @@$
10206The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10207@xref{Java Location Values}.
10208@end defvar
10209
10210@deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
10211Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10212@xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10213@end deftypefn
10214
10215@deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
10216Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10217@xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10218@end deftypefn
10219
10220@deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
10221Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
10222@xref{Error Recovery}.
10223@end deftypefn
10224
10225@deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10226Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10227reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10228operation.
10229@xref{Error Recovery}.
10230@end deftypefn
10231
10232@deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
10233@deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
10234@deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
10235Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10236instance in use.
10237@end deftypefn
10238
10239
10240@node Java Differences
10241@subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10242
10243The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10244between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10245section summarizes these differences.
10246
10247@itemize
10248@item
10249Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10250@code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10251macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10252appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10253opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10254only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10255See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10256
10257Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10258@code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10259method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10260method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10261corresponds to these C macros.}.
10262
10263@item
10264Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10265values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10266@samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10267@code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10268an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10269type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10270Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10271left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
10272@pxref{Java Action Features}.
10273
10274@item
10275The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10276@table @asis
10277@item @code{%code imports}
10278blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10279include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10280suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
10281
10282@item unqualified @code{%code}
10283blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10284
10285@item @code{%code lexer}
10286blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10287scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10288that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
10289Interface}).
10290@end table
10291
10292Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10293In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10294and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10295
10296The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10297be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10298the parser class.
10299@end itemize
10300
10301
10302@node Java Declarations Summary
10303@subsection Java Declarations Summary
10304
10305This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10306meaning when used in a Java parser.
10307
10308@deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10309Generate a Java class for the parser.
10310@end deffn
10311
10312@deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10313A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10314@emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10315constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10316@xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10317@end deffn
10318
10319@deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10320The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10321@code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10322@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10323@end deffn
10324
10325@deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10326A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10327and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10328@xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10329@end deffn
10330
10331@deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10332Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10333@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10334@end deffn
10335
10336@deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10337Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10338a Java @emph{type}.
10339@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10340@end deffn
10341
10342@deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10343Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10344@xref{Java Differences}.
10345@end deffn
10346
10347@deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10348Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10349@xref{Java Differences}.
10350@end deffn
10351
10352@deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10353Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10354@xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10355@end deffn
10356
10357@deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10358Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10359@emph{outside} the parser class.
10360@xref{Java Differences}.
10361@end deffn
10362
10363@deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10364Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
10365@xref{Java Differences}.
10366@end deffn
10367
10368@deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10369Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10370@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10371@end deffn
10372
10373@deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10374The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10375@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10376@end deffn
10377
10378@deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10379Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10380@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10381@end deffn
10382
10383@deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10384The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10385Default is none.
10386@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10387@end deffn
10388
10389@deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10390The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10391comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10392@xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10393@end deffn
10394
10395@deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10396The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10397positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10398class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10399@xref{Java Location Values}.
10400@end deffn
10401
10402@deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10403The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10404@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10405@end deffn
10406
10407@deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10408The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10409@code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10410@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10411@end deffn
10412
10413@deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10414The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10415the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10416@xref{Java Location Values}.
10417@end deffn
10418
10419@deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10420Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10421@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10422@end deffn
10423
10424@deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10425The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10426@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10427@end deffn
10428
10429@deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10430Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10431@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10432@end deffn
10433
10434@deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10435The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10436@code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10437@xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10438@end deffn
10439
10440
10441@c ================================================= FAQ
10442
10443@node FAQ
10444@chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10445@cindex frequently asked questions
10446@cindex questions
10447
10448Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10449are addressed.
10450
10451@menu
10452* Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10453* How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10454* Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10455* Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10456* Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10457* Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10458* I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10459* Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10460* Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10461* More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10462* Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10463* Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10464@end menu
10465
10466@node Memory Exhausted
10467@section Memory Exhausted
10468
10469@quotation
10470My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10471message. What can I do?
10472@end quotation
10473
10474This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10475,Recursive Rules}.
10476
10477@node How Can I Reset the Parser
10478@section How Can I Reset the Parser
10479
10480The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10481following typical questions:
10482
10483@quotation
10484I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10485properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10486too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10487@end quotation
10488
10489@noindent
10490or
10491
10492@quotation
10493My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10494which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10495although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10496@end quotation
10497
10498These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10499Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10500speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10501demonstration, consider the following source file,
10502@file{first-line.l}:
10503
10504@example
10505@group
10506%@{
10507#include <stdio.h>
10508#include <stdlib.h>
10509%@}
10510@end group
10511%%
10512.*\n ECHO; return 1;
10513%%
10514@group
10515int
10516yyparse (char const *file)
10517@{
10518 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10519 if (!yyin)
10520 @{
10521 perror ("fopen");
10522 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10523 @}
10524@end group
10525@group
10526 /* One token only. */
10527 yylex ();
10528 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10529 @{
10530 perror ("fclose");
10531 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10532 @}
10533 return 0;
10534@}
10535@end group
10536
10537@group
10538int
10539main (void)
10540@{
10541 yyparse ("input");
10542 yyparse ("input");
10543 return 0;
10544@}
10545@end group
10546@end example
10547
10548@noindent
10549If the file @file{input} contains
10550
10551@example
10552input:1: Hello,
10553input:2: World!
10554@end example
10555
10556@noindent
10557then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10558
10559@example
10560$ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10561$ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10562$ @kbd{./first-line}
10563input:1: Hello,
10564input:2: World!
10565@end example
10566
10567Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10568Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10569new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10570documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10571@samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10572Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10573handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10574functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10575input buffers.
10576
10577If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10578conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10579also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10580start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10581
10582@node Strings are Destroyed
10583@section Strings are Destroyed
10584
10585@quotation
10586My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10587them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10588@samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10589@end quotation
10590
10591This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10592Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10593of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10594
10595@example
10596@group
10597%@{
10598#include <stdio.h>
10599char *yylval = NULL;
10600%@}
10601@end group
10602@group
10603%%
10604.* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10605\n /* IGNORE */
10606%%
10607@end group
10608@group
10609int
10610main ()
10611@{
10612 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10613 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10614 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10615 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10616 return 0;
10617@}
10618@end group
10619@end example
10620
10621If you compile and run this code, you get:
10622
10623@example
10624$ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10625$ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10626$ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10627"one
10628two", "two"
10629@end example
10630
10631@noindent
10632this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10633in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10634(e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10635your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10636given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10637option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10638
10639@example
10640$ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10641$ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10642$ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10643"two", "two"
10644@end example
10645
10646
10647@node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10648@section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10649
10650@quotation
10651My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10652but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10653@end quotation
10654
10655Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10656the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10657the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10658the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10659structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10660i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10661execute simple instructions one after the others.
10662
10663@cindex abstract syntax tree
10664@cindex AST
10665If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10666to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10667recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10668or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10669traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10670execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10671compiler.
10672
10673This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10674invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10675
10676
10677@node Multiple start-symbols
10678@section Multiple start-symbols
10679
10680@quotation
10681I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10682implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10683multiple entry points.
10684@end quotation
10685
10686Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10687simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10688pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10689@code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10690real start-symbol:
10691
10692@example
10693%token START_FOO START_BAR;
10694%start start;
10695start:
10696 START_FOO foo
10697| START_BAR bar;
10698@end example
10699
10700These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10701parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10702
10703Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10704tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10705straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10706simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10707after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10708@code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10709available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10710@code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10711
10712@example
10713 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10714%%
10715%@{
10716 if (start_token)
10717 @{
10718 int t = start_token;
10719 start_token = 0;
10720 return t;
10721 @}
10722%@}
10723 /* @r{The rules.} */
10724@end example
10725
10726
10727@node Secure? Conform?
10728@section Secure? Conform?
10729
10730@quotation
10731Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10732@end quotation
10733
10734If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10735However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10736POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10737please send us a bug report.
10738
10739@node I can't build Bison
10740@section I can't build Bison
10741
10742@quotation
10743I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10744@code{msgfmt} is not found.
10745What should I do?
10746@end quotation
10747
10748Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10749is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10750subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10751support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10752@option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10753gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10754Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10755
10756
10757@node Where can I find help?
10758@section Where can I find help?
10759
10760@quotation
10761I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10762@end quotation
10763
10764First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10765@email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10766populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10767and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10768the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10769so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10770be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10771help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10772hearts.
10773
10774@node Bug Reports
10775@section Bug Reports
10776
10777@quotation
10778I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10779@end quotation
10780
10781Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10782version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10783mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10784the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10785try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10786
10787If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10788you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10789complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10790to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10791easier it will be to fix the bug.
10792
10793Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10794operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10795version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10796transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10797`configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10798send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10799
10800Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10801send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
10802
10803Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10804
10805@node More Languages
10806@section More Languages
10807
10808@quotation
10809Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10810favorite language here}?
10811@end quotation
10812
10813C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10814languages; contributions are welcome.
10815
10816@node Beta Testing
10817@section Beta Testing
10818
10819@quotation
10820What is involved in being a beta tester?
10821@end quotation
10822
10823It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10824release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10825that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10826everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10827failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10828but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10829essentially halted.
10830
10831Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10832developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10833recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10834systems are especially welcome.
10835
10836@node Mailing Lists
10837@section Mailing Lists
10838
10839@quotation
10840How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10841@end quotation
10842
10843See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10844
10845@c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10846
10847@node Table of Symbols
10848@appendix Bison Symbols
10849@cindex Bison symbols, table of
10850@cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10851
10852@deffn {Variable} @@$
10853In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10854@xref{Tracking Locations}.
10855@end deffn
10856
10857@deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10858In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
10859of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10860@end deffn
10861
10862@deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10863In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10864Locations}.
10865@end deffn
10866
10867@deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10868In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10869Locations}.
10870@end deffn
10871
10872@deffn {Variable} $$
10873In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10874@xref{Actions}.
10875@end deffn
10876
10877@deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10878In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10879right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10880@end deffn
10881
10882@deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10883In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10884@xref{Actions}.
10885@end deffn
10886
10887@deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10888In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10889@xref{Actions}.
10890@end deffn
10891
10892@deffn {Delimiter} %%
10893Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10894Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10895@xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10896@end deffn
10897
10898@c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10899@deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10900All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10901to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10902the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10903Grammar}.
10904@end deffn
10905
10906@deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10907Comment delimiters, as in C.
10908@end deffn
10909
10910@deffn {Delimiter} :
10911Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10912Grammar Rules}.
10913@end deffn
10914
10915@deffn {Delimiter} ;
10916Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10917@end deffn
10918
10919@deffn {Delimiter} |
10920Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10921@xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10922@end deffn
10923
10924@deffn {Directive} <*>
10925Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10926@code{%printer}.
10927
10928This feature is experimental.
10929More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10930feature.
10931
10932@xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10933@end deffn
10934
10935@deffn {Directive} <>
10936Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10937@code{%printer}.
10938
10939This feature is experimental.
10940More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10941feature.
10942
10943@xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10944@end deffn
10945
10946@deffn {Symbol} $accept
10947The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10948$end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10949Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10950@end deffn
10951
10952@deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10953@deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10954Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
10955default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
10956@xref{%code Summary}.
10957@end deffn
10958
10959@deffn {Directive} %debug
10960Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10961@end deffn
10962
10963@ifset defaultprec
10964@deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10965Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10966modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10967Precedence}.
10968@end deffn
10969@end ifset
10970
10971@deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
10972@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
10973@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
10974Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
10975@end deffn
10976
10977@deffn {Directive} %defines
10978Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10979meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10980@end deffn
10981
10982@deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10983Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10984@xref{Decl Summary}.
10985@end deffn
10986
10987@deffn {Directive} %destructor
10988Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10989discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10990@end deffn
10991
10992@deffn {Directive} %dprec
10993Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10994time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10995GLR Parsers}.
10996@end deffn
10997
10998@deffn {Symbol} $end
10999The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11000used in the grammar.
11001@end deffn
11002
11003@deffn {Symbol} error
11004A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11005grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11006the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11007containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11008token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11009corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11010token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11011@xref{Error Recovery}.
11012@end deffn
11013
11014@deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11015Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
11016when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11017@end deffn
11018
11019@deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11020Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11021Summary}.
11022@end deffn
11023
11024@deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11025Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11026Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11027@end deffn
11028
11029@deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11030Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11031@end deffn
11032
11033@deffn {Directive} %language
11034Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11035@xref{Decl Summary}.
11036@end deffn
11037
11038@deffn {Directive} %left
11039Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
11040@xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11041@end deffn
11042
11043@deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11044Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11045@code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11046for Pure Parsers}.
11047@end deffn
11048
11049@deffn {Directive} %merge
11050Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11051reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11052function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11053@xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11054@end deffn
11055
11056@deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11057Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11058@end deffn
11059
11060@ifset defaultprec
11061@deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11062Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11063modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11064Precedence}.
11065@end deffn
11066@end ifset
11067
11068@deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11069Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11070parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11071@end deffn
11072
11073@deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11074Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
11075@xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11076@end deffn
11077
11078@deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11079Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11080@xref{Decl Summary}.
11081@end deffn
11082
11083@deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11084Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11085@code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
11086Function @code{yyparse}}.
11087@end deffn
11088
11089@deffn {Directive} %prec
11090Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11091@xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11092@end deffn
11093
11094@deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11095Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11096Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11097unreasonable usage.
11098@end deffn
11099
11100@deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11101Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11102Require a Version of Bison}.
11103@end deffn
11104
11105@deffn {Directive} %right
11106Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
11107@xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11108@end deffn
11109
11110@deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11111Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11112@xref{Decl Summary}.
11113@end deffn
11114
11115@deffn {Directive} %start
11116Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11117Start-Symbol}.
11118@end deffn
11119
11120@deffn {Directive} %token
11121Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11122@xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11123@end deffn
11124
11125@deffn {Directive} %token-table
11126Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11127implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11128@end deffn
11129
11130@deffn {Directive} %type
11131Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11132,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11133@end deffn
11134
11135@deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11136The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11137@code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11138@code{error}.
11139@end deffn
11140
11141@deffn {Directive} %union
11142Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11143values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11144@end deffn
11145
11146@deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11147Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11148making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11149function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11150Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11151
11152For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11153instead.
11154@end deffn
11155
11156@deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11157Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11158read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11159@xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11160
11161For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11162instead.
11163@end deffn
11164
11165@deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11166Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11167token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11168@end deffn
11169
11170@deffn {Variable} yychar
11171External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11172lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11173@code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11174@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11175@end deffn
11176
11177@deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11178Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11179lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11180@end deffn
11181
11182@deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11183Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11184,Tracing Your Parser}.
11185@end deffn
11186
11187@deffn {Variable} yydebug
11188External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11189is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11190symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11191@end deffn
11192
11193@deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11194Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11195after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11196@end deffn
11197
11198@deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11199Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
11200recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
11201does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
11202want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
11203the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11204
11205For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11206instead.
11207@end deffn
11208
11209@deffn {Function} yyerror
11210User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11211@xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
11212Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11213@end deffn
11214
11215@deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11216An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
11217to request verbose, specific error message strings
11218when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
11219use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
11220@code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11221@end deffn
11222
11223@deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
11224Macro used to output run-time traces.
11225@xref{Enabling Traces}.
11226@end deffn
11227
11228@deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11229Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11230@xref{Memory Management}.
11231@end deffn
11232
11233@deffn {Function} yylex
11234User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11235the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11236@code{yylex}}.
11237@end deffn
11238
11239@deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11240An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11241arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11242macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11243@xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11244@end deffn
11245
11246@deffn {Variable} yylloc
11247External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11248numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11249variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11250@code{yylex}.)
11251You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11252grammar actions.
11253@xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11254In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11255@xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11256@end deffn
11257
11258@deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11259Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11260members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11261@end deffn
11262
11263@deffn {Variable} yylval
11264External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11265value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11266variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11267@code{yylex}.)
11268@xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11269In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11270@xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11271@end deffn
11272
11273@deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11274Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11275Management}.
11276@end deffn
11277
11278@deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11279Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11280(In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11281pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11282@xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11283@end deffn
11284
11285@deffn {Function} yyparse
11286The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11287parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11288@end deffn
11289
11290@deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
11291Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
11292Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
11293@xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
11294@end deffn
11295
11296@deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11297The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11298call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11299@xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11300@code{yypstate_delete}}.
11301(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11302More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11303@end deffn
11304
11305@deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11306The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11307call this function to create a new parser.
11308@xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11309@code{yypstate_new}}.
11310(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11311More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11312@end deffn
11313
11314@deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11315The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11316parse the rest of the input stream.
11317@xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11318@code{yypull_parse}}.
11319(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11320More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11321@end deffn
11322
11323@deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11324The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11325parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11326@code{yypush_parse}}.
11327(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11328More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11329@end deffn
11330
11331@deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11332An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11333@code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11334is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11335Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11336@end deffn
11337
11338@deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11339The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11340is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11341@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11342@end deffn
11343
11344@deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11345Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11346deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11347the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
113481, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11349reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11350@code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11351
11352In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11353limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11354set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11355unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11356@code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11357generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11358require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11359@end deffn
11360
11361@deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11362Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11363@xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11364@end deffn
11365
11366@node Glossary
11367@appendix Glossary
11368@cindex glossary
11369
11370@table @asis
11371@item Accepting state
11372A state whose only action is the accept action.
11373The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11374@xref{Understanding,,}.
11375
11376@item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11377Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11378by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11379committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11380@xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11381
11382@item Consistent state
11383A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11384
11385@item Context-free grammars
11386Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11387Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11388expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11389permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11390Grammars}.
11391
11392@item Default reduction
11393The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11394contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11395states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11396the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11397Reductions}.
11398
11399@item Defaulted state
11400A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11401
11402@item Dynamic allocation
11403Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11404compile time or on entry to a function.
11405
11406@item Empty string
11407Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11408character string of length zero.
11409
11410@item Finite-state stack machine
11411A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11412each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11413machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11414machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11415parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11416rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11417
11418@item Generalized LR (GLR)
11419A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11420that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11421deterministic parsing
11422algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11423possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11424right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11425LR Parsing}.
11426
11427@item Grouping
11428A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11429for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11430@xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11431
11432@item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11433A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11434context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11435language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11436number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11437often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11438extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11439grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11440less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11441grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11442
11443@item Infix operator
11444An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11445performs some operation.
11446
11447@item Input stream
11448A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11449
11450@item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11451A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11452detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11453use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11454unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11455syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11456syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11457
11458@item Language construct
11459One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11460the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11461@xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11462
11463@item Left associativity
11464Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11465@samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11466@samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11467
11468@item Left recursion
11469A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11470example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11471Rules}.
11472
11473@item Left-to-right parsing
11474Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11475left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11476
11477@item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11478A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11479@xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11480
11481@item Lexical tie-in
11482A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11483tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11484
11485@item Literal string token
11486A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11487
11488@item Lookahead token
11489A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11490Tokens}.
11491
11492@item LALR(1)
11493The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11494generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11495@xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11496
11497@item LR(1)
11498The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11499lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11500
11501@item Nonterminal symbol
11502A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11503be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11504words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11505
11506@item Parser
11507A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11508the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11509analyzer.
11510
11511@item Postfix operator
11512An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11513performs some operation.
11514
11515@item Reduction
11516Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11517nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11518Parser Algorithm}.
11519
11520@item Reentrant
11521A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11522number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11523invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11524
11525@item Reverse polish notation
11526A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11527
11528@item Right recursion
11529A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11530example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11531Rules}.
11532
11533@item Semantics
11534In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11535taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11536each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11537
11538@item Shift
11539A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11540further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11541already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11542
11543@item Single-character literal
11544A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11545@xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11546
11547@item Start symbol
11548The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11549the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11550first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11551@xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11552
11553@item Symbol table
11554A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11555during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11556information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11557
11558@item Syntax error
11559An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11560syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11561
11562@item Token
11563A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11564that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11565The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11566the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11567
11568@item Terminal symbol
11569A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11570grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11571@xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11572
11573@item Unreachable state
11574A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11575the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11576resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11577@end table
11578
11579@node Copying This Manual
11580@appendix Copying This Manual
11581@include fdl.texi
11582
11583@node Bibliography
11584@unnumbered Bibliography
11585
11586@table @asis
11587@item [Denny 2008]
11588Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11589for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
115902008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11591pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11592
11593@item [Denny 2010 May]
11594Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11595Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11596University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11597@uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11598
11599@item [Denny 2010 November]
11600Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11601Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11602in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
116032010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11604
11605@item [DeRemer 1982]
11606Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11607Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11608Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11609615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11610
11611@item [Knuth 1965]
11612Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11613@cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11614607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11615
11616@item [Scott 2000]
11617Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11618@cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11619London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11620@uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11621@end table
11622
11623@node Index
11624@unnumbered Index
11625
11626@printindex cp
11627
11628@bye
11629
11630@c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11631@c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11632@c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11633@c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11634@c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11635@c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11636@c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11637@c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11638@c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11639@c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11640@c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11641@c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11642@c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11643@c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
11644@c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11645@c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11646@c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11647@c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11648@c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11649@c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11650@c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11651@c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11652@c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11653@c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
11654@c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11655@c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11656@c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11657@c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11658@c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11659@c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11660@c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
11661@c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
11662@c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11663@c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
11664@c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11665@c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11666@c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11667@c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
11668@c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11669@c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
11670@c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11671@c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11672@c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11673@c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11674@c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
11675@c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11676@c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11677@c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11678@c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11679@c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11680@c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
11681@c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy
11682@c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american
11683
11684@c Local Variables:
11685@c ispell-dictionary: "american"
11686@c fill-column: 76
11687@c End: