]> git.saurik.com Git - bison.git/blame_incremental - doc/bison.texi
maint: update .gitignore
[bison.git] / doc / bison.texi
... / ...
CommitLineData
1\input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2@comment %**start of header
3@setfilename bison.info
4@include version.texi
5@settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
6@setchapternewpage odd
7
8@finalout
9
10@c SMALL BOOK version
11@c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12@c the smallbook format.
13@c @smallbook
14
15@c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16@c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
17@c @set defaultprec
18
19@ifnotinfo
20@syncodeindex fn cp
21@syncodeindex vr cp
22@syncodeindex tp cp
23@end ifnotinfo
24@ifinfo
25@synindex fn cp
26@synindex vr cp
27@synindex tp cp
28@end ifinfo
29@comment %**end of header
30
31@copying
32
33This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34@value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
35
36Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2013 Free Software
37Foundation, Inc.
38
39@quotation
40Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45(a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46``GNU Free Documentation License.''
47
48(a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
51freedom.''
52@end quotation
53@end copying
54
55@dircategory Software development
56@direntry
57* bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
58@end direntry
59
60@titlepage
61@title Bison
62@subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63@subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
64
65@author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
66
67@page
68@vskip 0pt plus 1filll
69@insertcopying
70@sp 2
71Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
7251 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
75ISBN 1-882114-44-2
76@sp 2
77Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
78@end titlepage
79
80@contents
81
82@ifnottex
83@node Top
84@top Bison
85@insertcopying
86@end ifnottex
87
88@menu
89* Introduction::
90* Conditions::
91* Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
93
94Tutorial sections:
95* Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96* Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
97
98Reference sections:
99* Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100* Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101* Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102* Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103* Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105* Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106* Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107* Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108* FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109* Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110* Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111* Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112* Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113* Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
114
115@detailmenu
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
117
118The Concepts of Bison
119
120* Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122* Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123* Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126* Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127* GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128* Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129* Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131* Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132* Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
133
134Writing GLR Parsers
135
136* Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137* Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138* GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139* Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140* Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
141
142Examples
143
144* RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146* Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148* Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149* Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150* Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152* Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153
154Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155
156* Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157* Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158* Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159* Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160* Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161* Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162* Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163
164Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
165
166* Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167* Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168* Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
169
170Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171
172* Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173* Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174* Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175
176Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177
178* Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179* Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180* Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181* Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182* Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
183
184Bison Grammar Files
185
186* Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187* Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188* Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189* Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
190* Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
191* Named References:: Using named references in actions.
192* Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
193* Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
194
195Outline of a Bison Grammar
196
197* Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
198* Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
199* Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
200* Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
201* Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
202
203Grammar Rules
204
205* Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
206* Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
207* Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
208
209
210Defining Language Semantics
211
212* Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
213* Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
214* Type Generation:: Generating the semantic value type.
215* Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
216* Structured Value Type:: Providing a structured semantic value type.
217* Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
218* Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
219* Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
220 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
221 action in the middle of a rule.
222
223Actions in Mid-Rule
224
225* Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
226* Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
227* Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
228
229Tracking Locations
230
231* Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
232* Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
233* Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
234
235Bison Declarations
236
237* Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
238* Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
239* Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
240* Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
241* Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
242* Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
243* Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
244* Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
245* Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
246* Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
247* Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
248* Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
249* %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
250* %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
251
252Parser C-Language Interface
253
254* Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
255* Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
256* Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
257* Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
258* Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
259* Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
260 which reads tokens.
261* Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
262* Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
263* Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
264 native language.
265
266The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
267
268* Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
269* Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
270 of the token it has read.
271* Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
272 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
273 actions want that.
274* Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
275 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
276
277The Bison Parser Algorithm
278
279* Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
280* Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
281* Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
282* Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
283* Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
284* Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
285* Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
286* Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
287* Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
288* Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
289
290Operator Precedence
291
292* Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
293* Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
294* Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
295* Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
296* How Precedence:: How they work.
297* Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
298
299Tuning LR
300
301* LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
302* Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
303* LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
304* Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
305
306Handling Context Dependencies
307
308* Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
309* Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
310* Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
311 error recovery rules must be written.
312
313Debugging Your Parser
314
315* Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
316* Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
317* Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
318* Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
319
320Tracing Your Parser
321
322* Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
323* Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
324* The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
325
326Invoking Bison
327
328* Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
329 in alphabetical order by short options.
330* Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
331* Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
332
333Parsers Written In Other Languages
334
335* C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
336* Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
337
338C++ Parsers
339
340* C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
341* C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
342* C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
343* C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
344* C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
345* A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
346
347C++ Location Values
348
349* C++ position:: One point in the source file
350* C++ location:: Two points in the source file
351* User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
352
353A Complete C++ Example
354
355* Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
356* Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
357* Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
358* Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
359* Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
360
361Java Parsers
362
363* Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
364* Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
365* Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
366* Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
367* Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
368* Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
369* Java Push Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the a push parser
370* Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
371* Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
372
373Frequently Asked Questions
374
375* Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
376* How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
377* Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
378* Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
379* Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
380* Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
381* I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
382* Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
383* Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
384* More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
385* Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
386* Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
387
388Copying This Manual
389
390* Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
391
392@end detailmenu
393@end menu
394
395@node Introduction
396@unnumbered Introduction
397@cindex introduction
398
399@dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
400annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
401LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
402feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
403tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
404a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
405calculators to complex programming languages.
406
407Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
408grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
409with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
410to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
411understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
412feature.
413
414We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
415using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
416last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
417chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
418of Bison in detail.
419
420Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
421it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
422added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
423Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
424to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
425@file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
426distribution.
427
428This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
429
430@node Conditions
431@unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
432
433The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
434parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
435permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
436parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
437parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
438
439The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
440compiler, have never
441had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
442software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
443policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
444License to all of the Bison source code.
445
446The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
447file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
448the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
449grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
450of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
451the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
452the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
453
454We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
455make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
456concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
457encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
458practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
459using the other GNU tools.
460
461This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
462You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
463inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
464exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
465exception.
466
467@node Copying
468@unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
469@include gpl-3.0.texi
470
471@node Concepts
472@chapter The Concepts of Bison
473
474This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
475details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
476use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
477
478@menu
479* Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
480 as mathematical ideas.
481* Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
482* Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
483 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
484 the name of an identifier, etc.).
485* Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
486* GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
487* Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
488* Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
489 how is the output used?
490* Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
491* Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
492@end menu
493
494@node Language and Grammar
495@section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
496
497@cindex context-free grammar
498@cindex grammar, context-free
499In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
500@dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
501@dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
502parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
503`expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
504can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
505``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
506recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
507recursion.
508
509@cindex BNF
510@cindex Backus-Naur form
511The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
512is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
513order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
514BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
515essentially machine-readable BNF.
516
517@cindex LALR grammars
518@cindex IELR grammars
519@cindex LR grammars
520There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
521it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
522are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
523to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
524of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
525additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
526@xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
527experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
528requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
529Construction}, to learn how.
530
531@cindex GLR parsing
532@cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
533@cindex ambiguous grammars
534@cindex nondeterministic parsing
535
536Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
537roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
538uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
539(called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
540grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
541apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
542grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
543lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
544With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
545general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
546parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
547are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
548possible parses of any given string is finite.
549
550@cindex symbols (abstract)
551@cindex token
552@cindex syntactic grouping
553@cindex grouping, syntactic
554In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
555unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
556grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
557@dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
558@dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
559corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
560corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
561
562We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
563nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
564and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
565punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
566`identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
567operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
568`char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
569(These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
570lexicography, not grammar.)
571
572Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
573
574@example
575int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
576square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
577 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
578@{ /* @r{open-brace} */
579 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
580 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
581@} /* @r{close-brace} */
582@end example
583
584The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
585declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
586grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
587`declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
588additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
589order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
590function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
591the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
592
593Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
594out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
595@code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
596reads informally as follows:
597
598@quotation
599A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
600`semicolon'.
601@end quotation
602
603@noindent
604There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
605statement in C.
606
607@cindex start symbol
608One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
609defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
610symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
611language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
612plays this role.
613
614For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
615program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
616context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
617not the start symbol.
618
619The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
620tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
621that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
622the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
623must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
624reports a syntax error.
625
626@node Grammar in Bison
627@section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
628@cindex Bison grammar
629@cindex grammar, Bison
630@cindex formal grammar
631
632A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
633for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
634a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
635
636A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
637as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
638in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
639
640The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
641type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
642convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
643nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
644@code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
645the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
646The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
647@xref{Symbols}.
648
649A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
650a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
651single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
652a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
653
654A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
655containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
656
657The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
658here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
659quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
660the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
661used in every rule.
662
663@example
664stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
665@end example
666
667@noindent
668@xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
669
670@node Semantic Values
671@section Semantic Values
672@cindex semantic value
673@cindex value, semantic
674
675A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
676if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
677@emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
678precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
679@samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
680grammatical.
681
682But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
683parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
6843989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
685has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
686,Defining Language Semantics},
687for details.
688
689The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
690@code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
691you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
692group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
693except their types.
694
695The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
696meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
697identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
698need to have any semantic value.)
699
700For example, an input token might be classified as token type
701@code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
702have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
703rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
704acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
705token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
706
707Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
708symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
709semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
710language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
711structure describing the meaning of the expression.
712
713@node Semantic Actions
714@section Semantic Actions
715@cindex semantic actions
716@cindex actions, semantic
717
718In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
719also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
720rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
721parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
722@xref{Actions}.
723
724Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
725of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
726suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
727expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
728subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
729The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
730newly recognized larger expression.
731
732For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
733two subexpressions:
734
735@example
736expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
737@end example
738
739@noindent
740The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
741from the values of the two subexpressions.
742
743@node GLR Parsers
744@section Writing GLR Parsers
745@cindex GLR parsing
746@cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
747@findex %glr-parser
748@cindex conflicts
749@cindex shift/reduce conflicts
750@cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
751
752In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
753LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
754certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
755decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
756reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
757a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
758input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
759(@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
760(@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
761
762To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
763more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
764@code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
765(@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
766(GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
767contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
768declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
769faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
770GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
771effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
772the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
773can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
774proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
775symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
776parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
777a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
778another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
779identical set of symbols.
780
781During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
782recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
783semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
784reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
785records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
786merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
787outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
788involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
789user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
790merged result.
791
792@menu
793* Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
794* Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
795* GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
796* Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
797* Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
798@end menu
799
800@node Simple GLR Parsers
801@subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
802@cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
803@cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
804@findex %glr-parser
805@findex %expect-rr
806@cindex conflicts
807@cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
808@cindex shift/reduce conflicts
809
810In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
811to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
812Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
813
814Consider a problem that
815arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
816programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
817
818@example
819type subrange = lo .. hi;
820type enum = (a, b, c);
821@end example
822
823@noindent
824The original language standard allows only numeric
825literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
826and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
82710206) and many other
828Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
829rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
830parentheses:
831
832@example
833type subrange = (a) .. b;
834@end example
835
836@noindent
837Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
838type with only one value:
839
840@example
841type enum = (a);
842@end example
843
844@noindent
845(These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
846valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
847
848These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
849With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
850possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
851@samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
852for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
853@samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
854value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
855current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
856
857You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
858to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
859contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
860grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
861expressions.
862
863You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
864forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
865undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
866scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
867are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
868value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
869work.
870
871A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
872use the GLR algorithm.
873When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
874merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
875simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
876error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
877@samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
878accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
879fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
880fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
881all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
882
883If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
884reports a syntax error as usual.
885
886The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
887correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
888lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
889for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
890that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
891
892In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
893and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
894for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
895grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
896The present example contains only one conflict between two
897rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
898cannot be nested. So the number of
899branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
900and the parsing time is still linear.
901
902Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
903parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
904
905@example
906%token TYPE DOTDOT ID
907
908@group
909%left '+' '-'
910%left '*' '/'
911@end group
912
913%%
914type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
915
916@group
917type:
918 '(' id_list ')'
919| expr DOTDOT expr
920;
921@end group
922
923@group
924id_list:
925 ID
926| id_list ',' ID
927;
928@end group
929
930@group
931expr:
932 '(' expr ')'
933| expr '+' expr
934| expr '-' expr
935| expr '*' expr
936| expr '/' expr
937| ID
938;
939@end group
940@end example
941
942When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
943about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
944parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
945declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
946recognized:
947
948@example
949type t = (a) .. b;
950@end example
951
952The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
953to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
954these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
955@samp{%%}):
956
957@example
958%glr-parser
959%expect-rr 1
960@end example
961
962@noindent
963No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
964parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
965limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
966notice when the parser splits.
967
968So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
969almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
970there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
971analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
972splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
973splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
974LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
975conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
976Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
977performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
978information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
979eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
980lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
981correctness.
982
983In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
984their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
985defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
986a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
987the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
988they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
989
990@node Merging GLR Parses
991@subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
992@cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
993@cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
994@findex %dprec
995@findex %merge
996@cindex conflicts
997@cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
998
999Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
1000
1001@example
1002%@{
1003 #include <stdio.h>
1004 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1005 int yylex (void);
1006 void yyerror (char const *);
1007%@}
1008
1009%token TYPENAME ID
1010
1011%right '='
1012%left '+'
1013
1014%glr-parser
1015
1016%%
1017
1018prog:
1019 %empty
1020| prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1021;
1022
1023stmt:
1024 expr ';' %dprec 1
1025| decl %dprec 2
1026;
1027
1028expr:
1029 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1030| TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1031 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1032| expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1033| expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1034;
1035
1036decl:
1037 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1038 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1039| TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1040 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1041;
1042
1043declarator:
1044 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1045| '(' declarator ')'
1046;
1047@end example
1048
1049@noindent
1050This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1051certain declarations and statements. For example,
1052
1053@example
1054T (x) = y+z;
1055@end example
1056
1057@noindent
1058parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1059(assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1060@samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1061Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1062@code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1063time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1064GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1065each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1066Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1067however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1068ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1069the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1070identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1071input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1072
1073At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1074grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1075In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1076declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1077to the parse that interprets the example as a
1078@code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1079The parser therefore prints
1080
1081@example
1082"x" y z + T <init-declare>
1083@end example
1084
1085The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1086parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1087
1088@example
1089T (x) + y;
1090@end example
1091
1092@noindent
1093This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1094construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1095Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1096However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1097have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1098between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1099case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1100into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1101assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1102then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1103
1104@example
1105x T <cast> y +
1106@end example
1107
1108Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1109the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1110actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1111other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1112follows:
1113
1114@example
1115stmt:
1116 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1117| decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1118;
1119@end example
1120
1121@noindent
1122and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1123
1124@example
1125static YYSTYPE
1126stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1127@{
1128 printf ("<OR> ");
1129 return "";
1130@}
1131@end example
1132
1133@noindent
1134with an accompanying forward declaration
1135in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1136
1137@example
1138%@{
1139 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1140 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1141%@}
1142@end example
1143
1144@noindent
1145With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1146as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1147
1148@example
1149"x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1150@end example
1151
1152Bison requires that all of the
1153productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1154@samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1155and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1156the offending merge.
1157
1158@node GLR Semantic Actions
1159@subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1160
1161The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1162parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1163
1164@subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1165@cindex deferred semantic actions
1166By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1167the associated reduction.
1168This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1169action in a GLR parser.
1170
1171@vindex yychar
1172@cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1173@vindex yylval
1174@cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1175@vindex yylloc
1176@cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1177In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1178the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1179After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1180you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1181lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1182In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1183influence syntax analysis.
1184@xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1185
1186@findex yyclearin
1187@cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1188In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1189In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1190shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1191For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1192Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1193future versions of Bison.
1194For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1195to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1196memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1197
1198@subsubsection YYERROR
1199@findex YYERROR
1200@cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1201Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1202(@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1203initiate error recovery.
1204During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1205the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1206The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1207error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1208selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1209In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1210parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1211the parse that invoked the test.
1212
1213@subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1214GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1215semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1216C++ code.
1217
1218@node Semantic Predicates
1219@subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1220@findex %?
1221@cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1222
1223In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1224GLR parsers
1225allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1226in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1227if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1228evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1229
1230@example
1231widget:
1232 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1233| %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1234;
1235@end example
1236
1237@noindent
1238is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1239widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1240action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1241evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1242expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1243which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1244to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1245
1246As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1247therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1248to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1249Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1250labels.
1251
1252There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1253actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1254For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1255
1256@example
1257widget:
1258 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1259 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1260| @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1261 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1262;
1263@end example
1264
1265@noindent
1266(reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1267false). However, this
1268does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1269have overlapping syntax.
1270Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1271a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1272for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1273@emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1274reports an error.
1275
1276Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1277evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1278
1279@node Compiler Requirements
1280@subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1281@cindex @code{inline}
1282@cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1283
1284The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1285later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1286C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1287up to the user of these parsers to handle
1288portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1289macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1290
1291@example
1292%@{
1293 #include <config.h>
1294%@}
1295@end example
1296
1297@noindent
1298will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1299
1300@example
1301%@{
1302 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1303 && ! defined inline)
1304 # define inline
1305 #endif
1306%@}
1307@end example
1308
1309@node Locations
1310@section Locations
1311@cindex location
1312@cindex textual location
1313@cindex location, textual
1314
1315Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1316and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1317the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1318Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1319
1320Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1321associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1322and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1323structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1324details).
1325
1326Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1327set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1328is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1329@code{@@3}.
1330
1331When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1332of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1333action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1334enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1335rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1336grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1337of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1338
1339@node Bison Parser
1340@section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1341@cindex Bison parser
1342@cindex Bison utility
1343@cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1344@cindex parser
1345
1346When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1347most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1348the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1349@dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1350implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1351Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1352whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1353of your program.
1354
1355The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1356the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1357expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1358uses.
1359
1360The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1361you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1362parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1363doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1364may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1365parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1366@xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1367
1368The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1369function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1370function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1371additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1372error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1373In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1374@code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1375@code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1376C-Language Interface}.
1377
1378Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1379write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1380itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1381functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1382error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1383@code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1384for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1385identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1386file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1387avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1388anything other than their usual meanings.
1389
1390In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1391headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1392reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1393@code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1394included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1395@code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1396(@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1397if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1398,Tracing Your Parser}).
1399
1400@node Stages
1401@section Stages in Using Bison
1402@cindex stages in using Bison
1403@cindex using Bison
1404
1405The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1406to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1407
1408@enumerate
1409@item
1410Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1411(@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1412in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1413instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1414sequence of C statements.
1415
1416@item
1417Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1418The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1419Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1420using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1421
1422@item
1423Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1424
1425@item
1426Write error-reporting routines.
1427@end enumerate
1428
1429To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1430must follow these steps:
1431
1432@enumerate
1433@item
1434Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1435
1436@item
1437Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1438
1439@item
1440Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1441@end enumerate
1442
1443@node Grammar Layout
1444@section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1445@cindex grammar file
1446@cindex file format
1447@cindex format of grammar file
1448@cindex layout of Bison grammar
1449
1450The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1451general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1452
1453@example
1454%@{
1455@var{Prologue}
1456%@}
1457
1458@var{Bison declarations}
1459
1460%%
1461@var{Grammar rules}
1462%%
1463@var{Epilogue}
1464@end example
1465
1466@noindent
1467The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1468in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1469
1470The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1471also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1472@code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1473You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1474printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1475used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1476
1477The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1478symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1479semantic values of various symbols.
1480
1481The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1482parts.
1483
1484The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1485definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1486simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1487
1488@node Examples
1489@chapter Examples
1490@cindex simple examples
1491@cindex examples, simple
1492
1493Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1494reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1495calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1496and a multi-function calculator. All
1497produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1498
1499These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1500languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1501source file to try them.
1502
1503@menu
1504* RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1505 a first example with no operator precedence.
1506* Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1507 Operator precedence is introduced.
1508* Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1509* Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1510* Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1511 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1512* Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1513@end menu
1514
1515@node RPN Calc
1516@section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1517@cindex reverse polish notation
1518@cindex polish notation calculator
1519@cindex @code{rpcalc}
1520@cindex calculator, simple
1521
1522The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1523notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1524provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1525The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1526
1527The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1528@samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1529
1530@menu
1531* Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1532* Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1533* Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1534* Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1535* Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1536* Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1537* Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1538@end menu
1539
1540@node Rpcalc Declarations
1541@subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1542
1543Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1544calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1545
1546@comment file: rpcalc.y
1547@example
1548/* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1549
1550@group
1551%@{
1552 #include <stdio.h>
1553 #include <math.h>
1554 int yylex (void);
1555 void yyerror (char const *);
1556%@}
1557@end group
1558
1559%define api.value.type @{double@}
1560%token NUM
1561
1562%% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1563@end example
1564
1565The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1566preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1567
1568The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1569function @code{pow}.
1570
1571The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1572needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1573before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1574epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1575prologue.
1576
1577The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison about
1578the tokens and their types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1579Declarations Section}).
1580
1581The @code{%define} directive defines the variable @code{api.value.type},
1582thus specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1583groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The Bison
1584parser will use whatever type @code{api.value.type} is defined as; if you
1585don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1586@samp{@{double@}}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1587which is a floating point number. C code can use @code{YYSTYPE} to refer to
1588the value @code{api.value.type}.
1589
1590Each terminal symbol that is not a single-character literal must be
1591declared. (Single-character literals normally don't need to be declared.)
1592In this example, all the arithmetic operators are designated by
1593single-character literals, so the only terminal symbol that needs to be
1594declared is @code{NUM}, the token type for numeric constants.
1595
1596@node Rpcalc Rules
1597@subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1598
1599Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1600
1601@comment file: rpcalc.y
1602@example
1603@group
1604input:
1605 %empty
1606| input line
1607;
1608@end group
1609
1610@group
1611line:
1612 '\n'
1613| exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1614;
1615@end group
1616
1617@group
1618exp:
1619 NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1620| exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1621| exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1622| exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1623| exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1624| exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1625| exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1626;
1627@end group
1628%%
1629@end example
1630
1631The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1632(given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1633complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1634symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1635which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1636mean.
1637
1638The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1639grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1640braces. @xref{Actions}.
1641
1642You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1643passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1644pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1645that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1646main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1647rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1648
1649@menu
1650* Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1651* Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1652* Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1653@end menu
1654
1655@node Rpcalc Input
1656@subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1657
1658Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1659
1660@example
1661input:
1662 %empty
1663| input line
1664;
1665@end example
1666
1667This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1668string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1669``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1670to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1671leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1672
1673The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1674colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1675empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1676is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1677It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and to use the
1678(optional) @code{%empty} directive, or to write the comment @samp{/* empty
1679*/} in it (@pxref{Empty Rules}).
1680
1681The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1682It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1683possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1684first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1685more times.
1686
1687The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1688grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1689input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1690
1691@node Rpcalc Line
1692@subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1693
1694Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1695
1696@example
1697line:
1698 '\n'
1699| exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1700;
1701@end example
1702
1703The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1704that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1705action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1706This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1707the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1708question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1709value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1710
1711This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1712a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1713uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1714that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1715value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1716
1717@node Rpcalc Expr
1718@subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1719
1720The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1721The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1722The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1723followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1724
1725@example
1726exp:
1727 NUM
1728| exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1729| exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1730@dots{}
1731;
1732@end example
1733
1734We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1735equally well have written them separately:
1736
1737@example
1738exp: NUM ;
1739exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1740exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1741@dots{}
1742@end example
1743
1744Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1745terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1746@code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1747the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1748associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1749@code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1750rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1751the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1752
1753You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1754action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1755This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1756
1757The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1758not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1759For example, this:
1760
1761@example
1762exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1763@end example
1764
1765@noindent
1766means the same thing as this:
1767
1768@example
1769exp:
1770 NUM
1771| exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1772| @dots{}
1773;
1774@end example
1775
1776@noindent
1777The latter, however, is much more readable.
1778
1779@node Rpcalc Lexer
1780@subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1781@cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1782@cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1783
1784The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1785or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1786tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1787Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1788
1789Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1790calculator. This
1791lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1792@code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1793that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1794for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1795
1796The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1797represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1798this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1799This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1800numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1801character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1802token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1803macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1804therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1805
1806The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1807global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1808for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, whose value
1809was defined at the beginning of the grammar via @samp{%define api.value.type
1810@{double@}}; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1811
1812A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1813(Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1814
1815Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1816
1817@comment file: rpcalc.y
1818@example
1819@group
1820/* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1821 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1822 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1823 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1824
1825#include <ctype.h>
1826@end group
1827
1828@group
1829int
1830yylex (void)
1831@{
1832 int c;
1833
1834 /* Skip white space. */
1835 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1836 continue;
1837@end group
1838@group
1839 /* Process numbers. */
1840 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1841 @{
1842 ungetc (c, stdin);
1843 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1844 return NUM;
1845 @}
1846@end group
1847@group
1848 /* Return end-of-input. */
1849 if (c == EOF)
1850 return 0;
1851 /* Return a single char. */
1852 return c;
1853@}
1854@end group
1855@end example
1856
1857@node Rpcalc Main
1858@subsection The Controlling Function
1859@cindex controlling function
1860@cindex main function in simple example
1861
1862In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1863kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1864@code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1865
1866@comment file: rpcalc.y
1867@example
1868@group
1869int
1870main (void)
1871@{
1872 return yyparse ();
1873@}
1874@end group
1875@end example
1876
1877@node Rpcalc Error
1878@subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1879@cindex error reporting routine
1880
1881When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1882function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1883always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1884@code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1885here is the definition we will use:
1886
1887@comment file: rpcalc.y
1888@example
1889#include <stdio.h>
1890
1891@group
1892/* Called by yyparse on error. */
1893void
1894yyerror (char const *s)
1895@{
1896 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1897@}
1898@end group
1899@end example
1900
1901After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1902and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1903(@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1904have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1905cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1906real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1907
1908@node Rpcalc Generate
1909@subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1910@cindex running Bison (introduction)
1911
1912Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1913arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1914simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1915the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1916@code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1917(@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1918
1919For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1920@code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1921
1922With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1923to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1924
1925@example
1926bison @var{file}.y
1927@end example
1928
1929@noindent
1930In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1931``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1932implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1933@samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1934contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1935in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1936copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1937
1938@node Rpcalc Compile
1939@subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1940@cindex compiling the parser
1941
1942Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1943
1944@example
1945@group
1946# @r{List files in current directory.}
1947$ @kbd{ls}
1948rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1949@end group
1950
1951@group
1952# @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1953# @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1954$ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1955@end group
1956
1957@group
1958# @r{List files again.}
1959$ @kbd{ls}
1960rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1961@end group
1962@end example
1963
1964The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1965example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1966
1967@example
1968$ @kbd{rpcalc}
1969@kbd{4 9 +}
1970@result{} 13
1971@kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1972@result{} -13
1973@kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1974@result{} 13
1975@kbd{5 6 / 4 n +}
1976@result{} -3.166666667
1977@kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1978@result{} 81
1979@kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1980$
1981@end example
1982
1983@node Infix Calc
1984@section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1985@cindex infix notation calculator
1986@cindex @code{calc}
1987@cindex calculator, infix notation
1988
1989We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1990notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1991parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1992@file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1993
1994@example
1995/* Infix notation calculator. */
1996
1997@group
1998%@{
1999 #include <math.h>
2000 #include <stdio.h>
2001 int yylex (void);
2002 void yyerror (char const *);
2003%@}
2004@end group
2005
2006@group
2007/* Bison declarations. */
2008%define api.value.type @{double@}
2009%token NUM
2010%left '-' '+'
2011%left '*' '/'
2012%precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2013%right '^' /* exponentiation */
2014@end group
2015
2016%% /* The grammar follows. */
2017@group
2018input:
2019 %empty
2020| input line
2021;
2022@end group
2023
2024@group
2025line:
2026 '\n'
2027| exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2028;
2029@end group
2030
2031@group
2032exp:
2033 NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2034| exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2035| exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2036| exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2037| exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2038| '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2039| exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2040| '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2041;
2042@end group
2043%%
2044@end example
2045
2046@noindent
2047The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2048same as before.
2049
2050There are two important new features shown in this code.
2051
2052In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2053types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2054@code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2055@code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2056associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2057ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2058the associativity/precedence.)
2059
2060Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2061declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2062the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2063has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2064by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2065only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2066Precedence}.
2067
2068The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2069section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2070Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2071@code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2072Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2073
2074Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2075
2076@need 500
2077@example
2078$ @kbd{calc}
2079@kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
20806.880952381
2081@kbd{-56 + 2}
2082-54
2083@kbd{3 ^ 2}
20849
2085@end example
2086
2087@node Simple Error Recovery
2088@section Simple Error Recovery
2089@cindex error recovery, simple
2090
2091Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2092recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2093error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2094Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2095@code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2096calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2097
2098The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2099may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2100been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2101
2102@example
2103@group
2104line:
2105 '\n'
2106| exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2107| error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2108;
2109@end group
2110@end example
2111
2112This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2113event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2114read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2115and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2116upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2117@code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2118that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2119difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2120misprint.
2121
2122This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2123kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2124signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2125signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2126input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2127input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2128Bison programs.
2129
2130@node Location Tracking Calc
2131@section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2132@cindex location tracking calculator
2133@cindex @code{ltcalc}
2134@cindex calculator, location tracking
2135
2136This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2137tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2138the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2139most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2140analyzer.
2141
2142@menu
2143* Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2144* Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2145* Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2146@end menu
2147
2148@node Ltcalc Declarations
2149@subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2150
2151The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2152the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2153
2154@example
2155/* Location tracking calculator. */
2156
2157%@{
2158 #include <math.h>
2159 int yylex (void);
2160 void yyerror (char const *);
2161%@}
2162
2163/* Bison declarations. */
2164%define api.value.type @{int@}
2165%token NUM
2166
2167%left '-' '+'
2168%left '*' '/'
2169%precedence NEG
2170%right '^'
2171
2172%% /* The grammar follows. */
2173@end example
2174
2175@noindent
2176Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2177type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2178by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2179four member structure with the following integer fields:
2180@code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2181@code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2182Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2183start at 1.
2184
2185@node Ltcalc Rules
2186@subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2187
2188Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2189language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2190to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2191from the new information.
2192
2193Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2194wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2195
2196@example
2197@group
2198input:
2199 %empty
2200| input line
2201;
2202@end group
2203
2204@group
2205line:
2206 '\n'
2207| exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2208;
2209@end group
2210
2211@group
2212exp:
2213 NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2214| exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2215| exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2216| exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2217@end group
2218@group
2219| exp '/' exp
2220 @{
2221 if ($3)
2222 $$ = $1 / $3;
2223 else
2224 @{
2225 $$ = 1;
2226 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2227 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2228 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2229 @}
2230 @}
2231@end group
2232@group
2233| '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2234| exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2235| '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2236@end group
2237@end example
2238
2239This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2240using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2241pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2242
2243We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2244automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2245@code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2246of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2247can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2248Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2249hand.
2250
2251@node Ltcalc Lexer
2252@subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2253
2254Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2255tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2256able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2257semantic values.
2258
2259To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2260input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2261
2262@example
2263@group
2264int
2265yylex (void)
2266@{
2267 int c;
2268@end group
2269
2270@group
2271 /* Skip white space. */
2272 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2273 ++yylloc.last_column;
2274@end group
2275
2276@group
2277 /* Step. */
2278 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2279 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2280@end group
2281
2282@group
2283 /* Process numbers. */
2284 if (isdigit (c))
2285 @{
2286 yylval = c - '0';
2287 ++yylloc.last_column;
2288 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2289 @{
2290 ++yylloc.last_column;
2291 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2292 @}
2293 ungetc (c, stdin);
2294 return NUM;
2295 @}
2296@end group
2297
2298 /* Return end-of-input. */
2299 if (c == EOF)
2300 return 0;
2301
2302@group
2303 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2304 if (c == '\n')
2305 @{
2306 ++yylloc.last_line;
2307 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2308 @}
2309 else
2310 ++yylloc.last_column;
2311 return c;
2312@}
2313@end group
2314@end example
2315
2316Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2317it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2318In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2319@code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2320
2321Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2322as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2323needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2324controlling function:
2325
2326@example
2327@group
2328int
2329main (void)
2330@{
2331 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2332 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2333 return yyparse ();
2334@}
2335@end group
2336@end example
2337
2338Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2339character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2340valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2341
2342@node Multi-function Calc
2343@section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2344@cindex multi-function calculator
2345@cindex @code{mfcalc}
2346@cindex calculator, multi-function
2347
2348Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2349a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2350functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2351be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2352as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2353
2354It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2355only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2356back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2357adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2358functions whose syntax has this form:
2359
2360@example
2361@var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2362@end example
2363
2364@noindent
2365At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2366to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2367Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2368
2369@example
2370@group
2371$ @kbd{mfcalc}
2372@kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2373@result{} 3.1415926536
2374@end group
2375@group
2376@kbd{sin(pi)}
2377@result{} 0.0000000000
2378@end group
2379@kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2380@result{} 2.3000000000
2381@kbd{alpha}
2382@result{} 2.3000000000
2383@kbd{ln(alpha)}
2384@result{} 0.8329091229
2385@kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2386@result{} 2.3000000000
2387$
2388@end example
2389
2390Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2391
2392@menu
2393* Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2394* Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2395* Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2396* Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2397* Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2398@end menu
2399
2400@node Mfcalc Declarations
2401@subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2402
2403Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2404
2405@comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2406@example
2407@group
2408%@{
2409 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2410 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2411 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of 'symrec'. */
2412 int yylex (void);
2413 void yyerror (char const *);
2414%@}
2415@end group
2416
2417%define api.value.type union /* Generate YYSTYPE from these types: */
2418%token <double> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2419%token <symrec*> VAR FNCT /* Symbol table pointer: variable and function. */
2420%type <double> exp
2421
2422@group
2423%precedence '='
2424%left '-' '+'
2425%left '*' '/'
2426%precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2427%right '^' /* exponentiation */
2428@end group
2429@end example
2430
2431The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2432These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2433(@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2434
2435The special @code{union} value assigned to the @code{%define} variable
2436@code{api.value.type} specifies that the symbols are defined with their data
2437types. Bison will generate an appropriate definition of @code{YYSTYPE} to
2438store these values.
2439
2440Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a type
2441with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols are
2442@code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their declarations are
2443augmented with their data type (placed between angle brackets). For
2444instance, values of @code{NUM} are stored in @code{double}.
2445
2446The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal symbols,
2447just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. Previously we did
2448not use @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are normally
2449declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But @code{exp} must be
2450declared explicitly so we can specify its value type. @xref{Type Decl,
2451,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2452
2453@node Mfcalc Rules
2454@subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2455
2456Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2457Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2458those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2459
2460@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2461@example
2462%% /* The grammar follows. */
2463@group
2464input:
2465 %empty
2466| input line
2467;
2468@end group
2469
2470@group
2471line:
2472 '\n'
2473| exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2474| error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2475;
2476@end group
2477
2478@group
2479exp:
2480 NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2481| VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2482| VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2483| FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2484| exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2485| exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2486| exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2487| exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2488| '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2489| exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2490| '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2491;
2492@end group
2493/* End of grammar. */
2494%%
2495@end example
2496
2497@node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2498@subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2499@cindex symbol table example
2500
2501The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2502names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2503grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2504requires some additional C functions for support.
2505
2506The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2507definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2508provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2509
2510@comment file: calc.h
2511@example
2512@group
2513/* Function type. */
2514typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2515@end group
2516
2517@group
2518/* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2519struct symrec
2520@{
2521 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2522 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2523 union
2524 @{
2525 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2526 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2527 @} value;
2528 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2529@};
2530@end group
2531
2532@group
2533typedef struct symrec symrec;
2534
2535/* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2536extern symrec *sym_table;
2537
2538symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2539symrec *getsym (char const *);
2540@end group
2541@end example
2542
2543The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2544the symbol table:
2545
2546@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2547@example
2548@group
2549struct init
2550@{
2551 char const *fname;
2552 double (*fnct) (double);
2553@};
2554@end group
2555
2556@group
2557struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2558@{
2559 @{ "atan", atan @},
2560 @{ "cos", cos @},
2561 @{ "exp", exp @},
2562 @{ "ln", log @},
2563 @{ "sin", sin @},
2564 @{ "sqrt", sqrt @},
2565 @{ 0, 0 @},
2566@};
2567@end group
2568
2569@group
2570/* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2571symrec *sym_table;
2572@end group
2573
2574@group
2575/* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2576static
2577void
2578init_table (void)
2579@{
2580 int i;
2581 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2582 @{
2583 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2584 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2585 @}
2586@}
2587@end group
2588@end example
2589
2590By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2591files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2592
2593Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2594symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2595(@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2596linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2597The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2598found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2599
2600@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2601@example
2602#include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2603#include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2604
2605@group
2606symrec *
2607putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2608@{
2609 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2610 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2611 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2612 ptr->type = sym_type;
2613 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2614 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2615 sym_table = ptr;
2616 return ptr;
2617@}
2618@end group
2619
2620@group
2621symrec *
2622getsym (char const *sym_name)
2623@{
2624 symrec *ptr;
2625 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2626 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2627 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2628 return ptr;
2629 return 0;
2630@}
2631@end group
2632@end example
2633
2634@node Mfcalc Lexer
2635@subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2636
2637The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2638the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2639characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2640functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2641
2642The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2643the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2644(@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2645already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2646@code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2647returned to @code{yyparse}.
2648
2649No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2650operators in @code{yylex}.
2651
2652@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2653@example
2654#include <ctype.h>
2655
2656@group
2657int
2658yylex (void)
2659@{
2660 int c;
2661
2662 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2663 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2664 continue;
2665
2666 if (c == EOF)
2667 return 0;
2668@end group
2669
2670@group
2671 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2672 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2673 @{
2674 ungetc (c, stdin);
2675 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.NUM);
2676 return NUM;
2677 @}
2678@end group
2679@end example
2680
2681@noindent
2682Bison generated a definition of @code{YYSTYPE} with a member named
2683@code{NUM} to store value of @code{NUM} symbols.
2684
2685@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2686@example
2687@group
2688 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2689 if (isalpha (c))
2690 @{
2691 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2692 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2693 static size_t length = 40;
2694 static char *symbuf = 0;
2695 symrec *s;
2696 int i;
2697@end group
2698 if (!symbuf)
2699 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2700
2701 i = 0;
2702 do
2703@group
2704 @{
2705 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2706 if (i == length)
2707 @{
2708 length *= 2;
2709 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2710 @}
2711 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2712 symbuf[i++] = c;
2713 /* Get another character. */
2714 c = getchar ();
2715 @}
2716@end group
2717@group
2718 while (isalnum (c));
2719
2720 ungetc (c, stdin);
2721 symbuf[i] = '\0';
2722@end group
2723
2724@group
2725 s = getsym (symbuf);
2726 if (s == 0)
2727 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2728 *((symrec**) &yylval) = s;
2729 return s->type;
2730 @}
2731
2732 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2733 return c;
2734@}
2735@end group
2736@end example
2737
2738@node Mfcalc Main
2739@subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2740
2741The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2742@code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2743on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2744
2745@comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2746@example
2747@group
2748/* Called by yyparse on error. */
2749void
2750yyerror (char const *s)
2751@{
2752 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2753@}
2754@end group
2755
2756@group
2757int
2758main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2759@{
2760 int i;
2761 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2762 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2763 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2764 yydebug = 1;
2765 init_table ();
2766 return yyparse ();
2767@}
2768@end group
2769@end example
2770
2771This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2772functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2773predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2774
2775@node Exercises
2776@section Exercises
2777@cindex exercises
2778
2779@enumerate
2780@item
2781Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2782
2783@item
2784Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2785modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2786It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2787
2788@item
2789Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2790uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2791@end enumerate
2792
2793@node Grammar File
2794@chapter Bison Grammar Files
2795
2796Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2797C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2798
2799The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2800@xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2801
2802@menu
2803* Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2804* Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2805* Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2806* Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2807* Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2808* Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2809* Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2810* Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2811@end menu
2812
2813@node Grammar Outline
2814@section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2815@cindex comment
2816@findex // @dots{}
2817@findex /* @dots{} */
2818
2819A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2820appropriate delimiters:
2821
2822@example
2823%@{
2824 @var{Prologue}
2825%@}
2826
2827@var{Bison declarations}
2828
2829%%
2830@var{Grammar rules}
2831%%
2832
2833@var{Epilogue}
2834@end example
2835
2836Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2837As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2838of line.
2839
2840@menu
2841* Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2842* Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2843* Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2844* Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2845* Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2846@end menu
2847
2848@node Prologue
2849@subsection The prologue
2850@cindex declarations section
2851@cindex Prologue
2852@cindex declarations
2853
2854The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2855of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2856rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2857file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2858use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2859you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2860@samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2861
2862The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2863of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2864character constant.
2865
2866You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2867@var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2868declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2869declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2870prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2871can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2872@code{%union} declaration.
2873
2874@example
2875@group
2876%@{
2877 #define _GNU_SOURCE
2878 #include <stdio.h>
2879 #include "ptypes.h"
2880%@}
2881@end group
2882
2883@group
2884%union @{
2885 long int n;
2886 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2887@}
2888@end group
2889
2890@group
2891%@{
2892 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2893 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2894%@}
2895@end group
2896
2897@dots{}
2898@end example
2899
2900When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2901Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2902of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2903@code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2904feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2905@code{#include} directives.
2906
2907@node Prologue Alternatives
2908@subsection Prologue Alternatives
2909@cindex Prologue Alternatives
2910
2911@findex %code
2912@findex %code requires
2913@findex %code provides
2914@findex %code top
2915
2916The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2917inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2918directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2919purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2920generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2921location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2922@code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2923
2924Look again at the example of the previous section:
2925
2926@example
2927@group
2928%@{
2929 #define _GNU_SOURCE
2930 #include <stdio.h>
2931 #include "ptypes.h"
2932%@}
2933@end group
2934
2935@group
2936%union @{
2937 long int n;
2938 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2939@}
2940@end group
2941
2942@group
2943%@{
2944 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2945 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2946%@}
2947@end group
2948
2949@dots{}
2950@end example
2951
2952@noindent
2953Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2954subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2955decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2956which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2957You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2958into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2959@code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2960prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2961@code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2962prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2963@emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2964
2965This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2966established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2967This behavior raises a few questions.
2968First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2969@code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2970Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2971In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2972This behavior is not intuitive.
2973
2974To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2975@code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2976Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2977@code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2978
2979@example
2980%code top @{
2981 #define _GNU_SOURCE
2982 #include <stdio.h>
2983
2984 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2985 * in a '%code requires'; see below. */
2986
2987 #include "ptypes.h"
2988 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2989 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2990 @{
2991 int first_line;
2992 int first_column;
2993 int last_line;
2994 int last_column;
2995 char *filename;
2996 @} YYLTYPE;
2997@}
2998
2999@group
3000%union @{
3001 long int n;
3002 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3003@}
3004@end group
3005
3006@group
3007%code @{
3008 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3009 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3010 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3011@}
3012@end group
3013
3014@dots{}
3015@end example
3016
3017@noindent
3018In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
3019functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
3020explicit which kind you intend.
3021Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
3022
3023The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
3024first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
3025parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
3026required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
3027implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
3028a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
3029want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
3030header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
3031in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
3032definition there.
3033
3034In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3035lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3036definitions.
3037Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3038
3039@example
3040@group
3041%code top @{
3042 #define _GNU_SOURCE
3043 #include <stdio.h>
3044@}
3045@end group
3046
3047@group
3048%code requires @{
3049 #include "ptypes.h"
3050@}
3051@end group
3052@group
3053%union @{
3054 long int n;
3055 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3056@}
3057@end group
3058
3059@group
3060%code requires @{
3061 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3062 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3063 @{
3064 int first_line;
3065 int first_column;
3066 int last_line;
3067 int last_column;
3068 char *filename;
3069 @} YYLTYPE;
3070@}
3071@end group
3072
3073@group
3074%code @{
3075 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3076 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3077 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3078@}
3079@end group
3080
3081@dots{}
3082@end example
3083
3084@noindent
3085Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3086@code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3087and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3088and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3089requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3090definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3091
3092When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3093@code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3094@code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3095a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3096to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3097special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3098unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3099make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3100other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3101practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3102requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3103alternatives.
3104
3105At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3106provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3107parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3108both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3109this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3110@code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3111@code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3112@code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3113sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3114@code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3115
3116@example
3117@group
3118%code top @{
3119 #define _GNU_SOURCE
3120 #include <stdio.h>
3121@}
3122@end group
3123
3124@group
3125%code requires @{
3126 #include "ptypes.h"
3127@}
3128@end group
3129@group
3130%union @{
3131 long int n;
3132 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3133@}
3134@end group
3135
3136@group
3137%code requires @{
3138 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3139 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3140 @{
3141 int first_line;
3142 int first_column;
3143 int last_line;
3144 int last_column;
3145 char *filename;
3146 @} YYLTYPE;
3147@}
3148@end group
3149
3150@group
3151%code provides @{
3152 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3153@}
3154@end group
3155
3156@group
3157%code @{
3158 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3159 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3160@}
3161@end group
3162
3163@dots{}
3164@end example
3165
3166@noindent
3167Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3168parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3169definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3170@code{YYSTYPE}.
3171
3172The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3173reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3174files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3175and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3176easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3177it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3178to you.
3179
3180You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3181In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3182This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3183the grammar file affects its functionality.
3184
3185The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3186organize your grammar file.
3187For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3188type:
3189
3190@example
3191@group
3192%code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3193%union @{ type1 field1; @}
3194%destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3195%printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3196@end group
3197
3198@group
3199%code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3200%union @{ type2 field2; @}
3201%destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3202%printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3203@end group
3204@end example
3205
3206@noindent
3207You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3208the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3209type.
3210(In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3211semicolon.)
3212And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3213definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3214counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3215Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3216
3217This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3218@var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3219However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3220think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3221Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3222code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3223@code{%code} is the most generic label.
3224Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3225as needed.
3226
3227@node Bison Declarations
3228@subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3229@cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3230@cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3231
3232The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3233terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3234In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3235@xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3236
3237@node Grammar Rules
3238@subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3239@cindex grammar rules section
3240@cindex rules section for grammar
3241
3242The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3243rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3244
3245There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3246@samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3247if it is the first thing in the file.
3248
3249@node Epilogue
3250@subsection The epilogue
3251@cindex additional C code section
3252@cindex epilogue
3253@cindex C code, section for additional
3254
3255The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3256implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3257beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3258want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3259before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3260of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3261functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3262functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3263if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3264C-Language Interface}.
3265
3266If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3267from the grammar rules.
3268
3269The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3270start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3271any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3272of the grammar file.
3273
3274@node Symbols
3275@section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3276@cindex nonterminal symbol
3277@cindex terminal symbol
3278@cindex token type
3279@cindex symbol
3280
3281@dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3282of the language.
3283
3284A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3285class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3286rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3287represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3288function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3289been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3290the symbol to stand for it.
3291
3292A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3293equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3294By convention, it should be all lower case.
3295
3296Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3297digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3298with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3299use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3300(@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3301make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3302languages) they are not exported as token names.
3303
3304There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3305
3306@itemize @bullet
3307@item
3308A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3309identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3310such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3311@code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3312
3313@item
3314@cindex character token
3315@cindex literal token
3316@cindex single-character literal
3317A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3318written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3319constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3320character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3321specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3322Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3323,Operator Precedence}).
3324
3325By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3326token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3327type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3328token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3329your program will confuse other readers.
3330
3331All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3332used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3333character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3334end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3335for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3336special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3337allowed.
3338
3339@item
3340@cindex string token
3341@cindex literal string token
3342@cindex multicharacter literal
3343A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3344example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3345doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3346value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3347(@pxref{Precedence}).
3348
3349You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3350alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3351Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3352retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3353@code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3354
3355@strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3356
3357By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3358that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3359type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3360does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3361read your program will be confused.
3362
3363All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3364Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3365string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3366meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3367literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3368containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3369@end itemize
3370
3371How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3372grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3373on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3374
3375The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3376symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3377Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3378it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3379for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3380character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3381requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3382char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3383Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3384file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3385is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3386Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3387
3388If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3389token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3390option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3391into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3392in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3393
3394If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3395host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3396execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3397digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3398characters in the following C-language string:
3399
3400@example
3401"\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3402@end example
3403
3404The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3405and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3406ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3407program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3408EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3409generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3410character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3411contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3412ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3413incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3414compiling them.
3415
3416The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3417(@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3418In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3419value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3420one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3421
3422@node Rules
3423@section Grammar Rules
3424
3425A Bison grammar is a list of rules.
3426
3427@menu
3428* Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
3429* Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
3430* Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
3431@end menu
3432
3433@node Rules Syntax
3434@subsection Syntax of Grammar Rules
3435@cindex rule syntax
3436@cindex grammar rule syntax
3437@cindex syntax of grammar rules
3438
3439A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3440
3441@example
3442@var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3443@end example
3444
3445@noindent
3446where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3447and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3448are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3449
3450For example,
3451
3452@example
3453exp: exp '+' exp;
3454@end example
3455
3456@noindent
3457says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3458can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3459
3460White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3461extra white space as you wish.
3462
3463Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3464the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3465
3466@example
3467@{@var{C statements}@}
3468@end example
3469
3470@noindent
3471@cindex braced code
3472This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3473braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3474any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3475does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3476copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3477compiler can check it.
3478
3479Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3480within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3481affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3482braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3483and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3484code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3485nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3486character constants.
3487
3488Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3489@xref{Actions}.
3490
3491@findex |
3492Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3493be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3494
3495@example
3496@group
3497@var{result}:
3498 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3499| @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3500@dots{}
3501;
3502@end group
3503@end example
3504
3505@noindent
3506They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3507
3508@node Empty Rules
3509@subsection Empty Rules
3510@cindex empty rule
3511@cindex rule, empty
3512@findex %empty
3513
3514A rule is said to be @dfn{empty} if its right-hand side (@var{components})
3515is empty. It means that @var{result} can match the empty string. For
3516example, here is how to define an optional semicolon:
3517
3518@example
3519semicolon.opt: | ";";
3520@end example
3521
3522@noindent
3523It is easy not to see an empty rule, especially when @code{|} is used. The
3524@code{%empty} directive allows to make explicit that a rule is empty on
3525purpose:
3526
3527@example
3528@group
3529semicolon.opt:
3530 %empty
3531| ";"
3532;
3533@end group
3534@end example
3535
3536Flagging a non-empty rule with @code{%empty} is an error. If run with
3537@option{-Wempty-rule}, @command{bison} will report empty rules without
3538@code{%empty}. Using @code{%empty} enables this warning, unless
3539@option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
3540
3541The @code{%empty} directive is a Bison extension, it does not work with
3542Yacc. To remain compatible with POSIX Yacc, it is customary to write a
3543comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule with no components:
3544
3545@example
3546@group
3547semicolon.opt:
3548 /* empty */
3549| ";"
3550;
3551@end group
3552@end example
3553
3554
3555@node Recursion
3556@subsection Recursive Rules
3557@cindex recursive rule
3558@cindex rule, recursive
3559
3560A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3561appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3562use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3563number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3564comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3565
3566@example
3567@group
3568expseq1:
3569 exp
3570| expseq1 ',' exp
3571;
3572@end group
3573@end example
3574
3575@cindex left recursion
3576@cindex right recursion
3577@noindent
3578Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3579right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3580the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3581
3582@example
3583@group
3584expseq1:
3585 exp
3586| exp ',' expseq1
3587;
3588@end group
3589@end example
3590
3591@noindent
3592Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3593recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3594parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3595Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3596number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3597shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3598@xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3599of this.
3600
3601@cindex mutual recursion
3602@dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3603rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3604in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3605side.
3606
3607For example:
3608
3609@example
3610@group
3611expr:
3612 primary
3613| primary '+' primary
3614;
3615@end group
3616
3617@group
3618primary:
3619 constant
3620| '(' expr ')'
3621;
3622@end group
3623@end example
3624
3625@noindent
3626defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3627other.
3628
3629@node Semantics
3630@section Defining Language Semantics
3631@cindex defining language semantics
3632@cindex language semantics, defining
3633
3634The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3635are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3636groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3637
3638For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3639associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3640because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3641the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3642
3643@menu
3644* Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3645* Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3646* Type Generation:: Generating the semantic value type.
3647* Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
3648* Structured Value Type:: Providing a structured semantic value type.
3649* Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3650* Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3651* Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3652 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3653 action in the middle of a rule.
3654@end menu
3655
3656@node Value Type
3657@subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3658@cindex semantic value type
3659@cindex value type, semantic
3660@cindex data types of semantic values
3661@cindex default data type
3662
3663In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3664the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3665RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3666Notation Calculator}).
3667
3668Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3669program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3670specify some other type, define the @code{%define} variable
3671@code{api.value.type} like this:
3672
3673@example
3674%define api.value.type @{double@}
3675@end example
3676
3677@noindent
3678or
3679
3680@example
3681%define api.value.type @{struct semantic_type@}
3682@end example
3683
3684The value of @code{api.value.type} should be a type name that does not
3685contain parentheses or square brackets.
3686
3687Alternatively, instead of relying of Bison's @code{%define} support, you may
3688rely on the C/C++ preprocessor and define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like
3689this:
3690
3691@example
3692#define YYSTYPE double
3693@end example
3694
3695@noindent
3696This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3697(@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}). If compatibility
3698with POSIX Yacc matters to you, use this. Note however that Bison cannot
3699know @code{YYSTYPE}'s value, not even whether it is defined, so there are
3700services it cannot provide. Besides this works only for languages that have
3701a preprocessor.
3702
3703@node Multiple Types
3704@subsection More Than One Value Type
3705
3706In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3707of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3708@code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3709@code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3710symbol table.
3711
3712To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3713requires you to do two things:
3714
3715@itemize @bullet
3716@item
3717Specify the entire collection of possible data types. There are several
3718options:
3719@itemize @bullet
3720@item
3721let Bison compute the union type from the tags you assign to symbols;
3722
3723@item
3724use the @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union
3725Declaration});
3726
3727@item
3728define the @code{%define} variable @code{api.value.type} to be a union type
3729whose members are the type tags (@pxref{Structured Value Type,, Providing a
3730Structured Semantic Value Type});
3731
3732@item
3733use a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a
3734union type whose member names are the type tags.
3735@end itemize
3736
3737@item
3738Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3739which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3740@code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3741and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3742Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3743@end itemize
3744
3745@node Type Generation
3746@subsection Generating the Semantic Value Type
3747@cindex declaring value types
3748@cindex value types, declaring
3749@findex %define api.value.type union
3750
3751The special value @code{union} of the @code{%define} variable
3752@code{api.value.type} instructs Bison that the tags used with the
3753@code{%token} and @code{%type} directives are genuine types, not names of
3754members of @code{YYSTYPE}.
3755
3756For example:
3757
3758@example
3759%define api.value.type union
3760%token <int> INT "integer"
3761%token <int> 'n'
3762%type <int> expr
3763%token <char const *> ID "identifier"
3764@end example
3765
3766@noindent
3767generates an appropriate value of @code{YYSTYPE} to support each symbol
3768type. The name of the member of @code{YYSTYPE} for tokens than have a
3769declared identifier @var{id} (such as @code{INT} and @code{ID} above, but
3770not @code{'n'}) is @code{@var{id}}. The other symbols have unspecified
3771names on which you should not depend; instead, relying on C casts to access
3772the semantic value with the appropriate type:
3773
3774@example
3775/* For an "integer". */
3776yylval.INT = 42;
3777return INT;
3778
3779/* For an 'n', also declared as int. */
3780*((int*)&yylval) = 42;
3781return 'n';
3782
3783/* For an "identifier". */
3784yylval.ID = "42";
3785return ID;
3786@end example
3787
3788If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.token.prefix} is defined
3789(@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}), then it is also used to prefix
3790the union member names. For instance, with @samp{%define api.token.prefix
3791@{TOK_@}}:
3792
3793@example
3794/* For an "integer". */
3795yylval.TOK_INT = 42;
3796return TOK_INT;
3797@end example
3798
3799This Bison extension cannot work if @code{%yacc} (or
3800@option{-y}/@option{--yacc}) is enabled, as POSIX mandates that Yacc
3801generate tokens as macros (e.g., @samp{#define INT 258}, or @samp{#define
3802TOK_INT 258}).
3803
3804This feature is new, and user feedback would be most welcome.
3805
3806A similar feature is provided for C++ that in addition overcomes C++
3807limitations (that forbid non-trivial objects to be part of a @code{union}):
3808@samp{%define api.value.type variant}, see @ref{C++ Variants}.
3809
3810@node Union Decl
3811@subsection The Union Declaration
3812@cindex declaring value types
3813@cindex value types, declaring
3814@findex %union
3815
3816The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of possible
3817data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is followed by
3818braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a @code{union} in C@.
3819
3820For example:
3821
3822@example
3823@group
3824%union @{
3825 double val;
3826 symrec *tptr;
3827@}
3828@end group
3829@end example
3830
3831@noindent
3832This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
3833*}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
3834in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
3835for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3836
3837As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the @code{%union}. For
3838example:
3839
3840@example
3841@group
3842%union value @{
3843 double val;
3844 symrec *tptr;
3845@}
3846@end group
3847@end example
3848
3849@noindent
3850specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
3851@code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
3852@code{YYSTYPE}.
3853
3854As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple @code{%union}
3855declarations; their contents are concatenated. However, only the first
3856@code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
3857
3858Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
3859a semicolon after the closing brace.
3860
3861@node Structured Value Type
3862@subsection Providing a Structured Semantic Value Type
3863@cindex declaring value types
3864@cindex value types, declaring
3865@findex %union
3866
3867Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
3868@code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one @samp{<@var{type}>}
3869tag. For example, you can put the following into a header file
3870@file{parser.h}:
3871
3872@example
3873@group
3874union YYSTYPE @{
3875 double val;
3876 symrec *tptr;
3877@};
3878@end group
3879@end example
3880
3881@noindent
3882and then your grammar can use the following instead of @code{%union}:
3883
3884@example
3885@group
3886%@{
3887#include "parser.h"
3888%@}
3889%define api.value.type @{union YYSTYPE@}
3890%type <val> expr
3891%token <tptr> ID
3892@end group
3893@end example
3894
3895Actually, you may also provide a @code{struct} rather that a @code{union},
3896which may be handy if you want to track information for every symbol (such
3897as preceding comments).
3898
3899The type you provide may even be structured and include pointers, in which
3900case the type tags you provide may be composite, with @samp{.} and @samp{->}
3901operators.
3902
3903@node Actions
3904@subsection Actions
3905@cindex action
3906@vindex $$
3907@vindex $@var{n}
3908@vindex $@var{name}
3909@vindex $[@var{name}]
3910
3911An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3912each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3913is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3914semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3915
3916An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3917placed at any position in the rule;
3918it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3919end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3920a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3921Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3922
3923The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3924components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3925which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3926value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3927the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3928references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3929Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3930appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3931implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3932for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3933can be assigned to.
3934
3935Here is a typical example:
3936
3937@example
3938@group
3939exp:
3940@dots{}
3941| exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3942@end group
3943@end example
3944
3945Or, in terms of named references:
3946
3947@example
3948@group
3949exp[result]:
3950@dots{}
3951| exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3952@end group
3953@end example
3954
3955@noindent
3956This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3957connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3958(@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3959refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3960which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3961The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3962semantic value of
3963the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3964useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3965referred to as @code{$2}.
3966
3967@xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3968references construct.
3969
3970Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3971separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3972difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3973``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3974following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3975
3976@example
3977a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3978@end example
3979
3980@cindex default action
3981If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3982@w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3983becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3984valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3985action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3986unless the rule's value does not matter.
3987
3988@code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3989to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3990current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3991you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3992is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3993
3994@example
3995@group
3996foo:
3997 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3998| expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3999;
4000@end group
4001
4002@group
4003bar:
4004 %empty @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
4005;
4006@end group
4007@end example
4008
4009As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
4010always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
4011definition of @code{foo}.
4012
4013@vindex yylval
4014It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
4015any, from a semantic action.
4016This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
4017@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4018
4019@node Action Types
4020@subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
4021@cindex action data types
4022@cindex data types in actions
4023
4024If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
4025and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
4026
4027If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
4028must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
4029symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
4030@code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
4031in the rule. In this example,
4032
4033@example
4034@group
4035exp:
4036 @dots{}
4037| exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
4038@end group
4039@end example
4040
4041@noindent
4042@code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
4043have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
4044@code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
4045terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
4046
4047Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
4048by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
4049reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
4050
4051@example
4052@group
4053%union @{
4054 int itype;
4055 double dtype;
4056@}
4057@end group
4058@end example
4059
4060@noindent
4061then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
4062rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
4063
4064@node Mid-Rule Actions
4065@subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
4066@cindex actions in mid-rule
4067@cindex mid-rule actions
4068
4069Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
4070These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
4071are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
4072
4073@menu
4074* Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
4075* Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
4076* Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
4077@end menu
4078
4079@node Using Mid-Rule Actions
4080@subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
4081
4082A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
4083@code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
4084it is run before they are parsed.
4085
4086The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
4087This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
4088(and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
4089along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
4090@code{$@var{n}}.
4091
4092The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
4093its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
4094can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
4095to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
4096in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
4097specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
4098
4099There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
4100action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
4101only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
4102at the end of the rule.
4103
4104Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
4105statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
4106serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
4107duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
4108@var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
4109remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
4110
4111@example
4112@group
4113stmt:
4114 "let" '(' var ')'
4115 @{
4116 $<context>$ = push_context ();
4117 declare_variable ($3);
4118 @}
4119 stmt
4120 @{
4121 $$ = $6;
4122 pop_context ($<context>5);
4123 @}
4124@end group
4125@end example
4126
4127@noindent
4128As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
4129action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
4130list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
4131@code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
4132@code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
4133first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
4134parsed.
4135
4136Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
4137component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
4138and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
4139
4140@example
4141@group
4142stmt:
4143 "let" '(' var ')'
4144 @{
4145 $<context>let = push_context ();
4146 declare_variable ($3);
4147 @}[let]
4148 stmt
4149 @{
4150 $$ = $6;
4151 pop_context ($<context>let);
4152 @}
4153@end group
4154@end example
4155
4156After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
4157value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
4158earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
4159removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
4160appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
4161
4162@findex %destructor
4163@cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
4164@cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
4165In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
4166Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
4167it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
4168restoring it.
4169Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
4170Discarded Symbols}).
4171However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
4172a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
4173
4174One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
4175declare a destructor for that symbol:
4176
4177@example
4178@group
4179%type <context> let
4180%destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
4181@end group
4182
4183%%
4184
4185@group
4186stmt:
4187 let stmt
4188 @{
4189 $$ = $2;
4190 pop_context ($let);
4191 @};
4192@end group
4193
4194@group
4195let:
4196 "let" '(' var ')'
4197 @{
4198 $let = push_context ();
4199 declare_variable ($3);
4200 @};
4201
4202@end group
4203@end example
4204
4205@noindent
4206Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
4207Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
4208this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
4209
4210@node Mid-Rule Action Translation
4211@subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
4212@vindex $@@@var{n}
4213@vindex @@@var{n}
4214
4215As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
4216rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
4217graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
4218reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
4219following rule:
4220
4221@example
4222exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
4223@end example
4224
4225@noindent
4226is translated into:
4227
4228@example
4229$@@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4230$@@2: %empty @{ c(); @};
4231$@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4232exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
4233@end example
4234
4235@noindent
4236with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
4237
4238A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
4239the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
4240action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
4241
4242@example
4243exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4244@end example
4245
4246@noindent
4247is translated into
4248
4249@example
4250@@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4251@@2: %empty @{ $$ = c(); @};
4252$@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4253exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
4254@end example
4255
4256There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
4257action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
4258final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
4259final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
4260@code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
4261Bison}):
4262
4263@example
4264$ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
4265@group
4266mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
4267 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4268 ^^^^^^^^
4269@end group
4270@group
4271mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
4272 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4273 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
4274@end group
4275@end example
4276
4277
4278@node Mid-Rule Conflicts
4279@subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
4280Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
4281conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
4282action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
4283can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
4284token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
4285declaration or not:
4286
4287@example
4288@group
4289compound:
4290 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4291| '@{' statements '@}'
4292;
4293@end group
4294@end example
4295
4296@noindent
4297But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
4298
4299@example
4300@group
4301compound:
4302 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4303 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4304@end group
4305@group
4306| '@{' statements '@}'
4307;
4308@end group
4309@end example
4310
4311@noindent
4312Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
4313when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
4314must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
4315information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
4316the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
4317deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
4318
4319You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
4320actions into the two rules, like this:
4321
4322@example
4323@group
4324compound:
4325 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4326 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4327| @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4328 '@{' statements '@}'
4329;
4330@end group
4331@end example
4332
4333@noindent
4334But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
4335are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
4336
4337If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
4338statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
4339does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
4340
4341@example
4342@group
4343compound:
4344 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4345 declarations statements '@}'
4346| '@{' statements '@}'
4347;
4348@end group
4349@end example
4350
4351@noindent
4352Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
4353which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
4354
4355Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
4356serves as a subroutine:
4357
4358@example
4359@group
4360subroutine:
4361 %empty @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4362;
4363@end group
4364
4365@group
4366compound:
4367 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4368| subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4369;
4370@end group
4371@end example
4372
4373@noindent
4374Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4375deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4376
4377
4378@node Tracking Locations
4379@section Tracking Locations
4380@cindex location
4381@cindex textual location
4382@cindex location, textual
4383
4384Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4385functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4386especially symbol locations.
4387
4388The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4389actions to take when rules are matched.
4390
4391@menu
4392* Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4393* Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4394* Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4395@end menu
4396
4397@node Location Type
4398@subsection Data Type of Locations
4399@cindex data type of locations
4400@cindex default location type
4401
4402Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4403since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4404
4405You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4406@code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4407defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4408When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4409four members:
4410
4411@example
4412typedef struct YYLTYPE
4413@{
4414 int first_line;
4415 int first_column;
4416 int last_line;
4417 int last_column;
4418@} YYLTYPE;
4419@end example
4420
4421When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4422initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4423@code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4424initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4425Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4426
4427@node Actions and Locations
4428@subsection Actions and Locations
4429@cindex location actions
4430@cindex actions, location
4431@vindex @@$
4432@vindex @@@var{n}
4433@vindex @@@var{name}
4434@vindex @@[@var{name}]
4435
4436Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4437describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4438
4439The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4440similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4441constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4442The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4443@code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4444@code{@@$}.
4445
4446In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4447@code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4448@xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4449references construct.
4450
4451Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4452
4453@example
4454@group
4455exp:
4456 @dots{}
4457| exp '/' exp
4458 @{
4459 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4460 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4461 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4462 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4463 if ($3)
4464 $$ = $1 / $3;
4465 else
4466 @{
4467 $$ = 1;
4468 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
4469 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4470 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4471 @}
4472 @}
4473@end group
4474@end example
4475
4476As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4477run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4478beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4479last symbol.
4480
4481With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4482example above simply rewrites this way:
4483
4484@example
4485@group
4486exp:
4487 @dots{}
4488| exp '/' exp
4489 @{
4490 if ($3)
4491 $$ = $1 / $3;
4492 else
4493 @{
4494 $$ = 1;
4495 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
4496 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4497 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4498 @}
4499 @}
4500@end group
4501@end example
4502
4503@vindex yylloc
4504It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4505from a semantic action.
4506This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4507@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4508
4509@node Location Default Action
4510@subsection Default Action for Locations
4511@vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4512@cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4513
4514Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4515locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4516the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4517rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4518matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4519while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4520Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4521parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4522of that ambiguity.
4523
4524Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4525dedicated code from semantic actions.
4526
4527The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4528the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4529rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4530all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4531parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4532When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4533right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4534When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4535of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4536parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4537
4538By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4539
4540@example
4541@group
4542# define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4543do \
4544 if (N) \
4545 @{ \
4546 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4547 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4548 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4549 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4550 @} \
4551 else \
4552 @{ \
4553 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4554 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4555 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4556 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4557 @} \
4558while (0)
4559@end group
4560@end example
4561
4562@noindent
4563where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4564in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4565just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4566
4567When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4568
4569@itemize @bullet
4570@item
4571All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4572result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4573
4574@item
4575For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4576right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4577valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4578During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4579
4580@item
4581Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4582actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4583macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4584statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4585@end itemize
4586
4587@node Named References
4588@section Named References
4589@cindex named references
4590
4591As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4592semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4593form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4594such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4595insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4596to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4597
4598To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4599using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4600used as named references. For example:
4601
4602@example
4603@group
4604invocation: op '(' args ')'
4605 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4606@end group
4607@end example
4608
4609@noindent
4610Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4611
4612@example
4613@group
4614invocation: op '(' args ')'
4615 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4616@end group
4617@end example
4618
4619@noindent
4620However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4621ambiguities:
4622
4623@example
4624@group
4625exp: exp '/' exp
4626 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4627
4628exp: exp '/' exp
4629 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4630
4631exp: exp '/' exp
4632 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4633@end group
4634@end example
4635
4636@noindent
4637When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4638locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4639appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4640@example
4641@group
4642exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4643 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4644@end group
4645@end example
4646
4647@noindent
4648In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4649explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4650closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4651@example
4652@group
4653exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4654 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4655@end group
4656@end example
4657
4658@noindent
4659
4660In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4661bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4662@example
4663@group
4664if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4665 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4666@end group
4667@end example
4668
4669It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4670C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4671@samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4672@samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4673value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4674entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4675@samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4676
4677The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4678to stabilize it.
4679
4680@node Declarations
4681@section Bison Declarations
4682@cindex declarations, Bison
4683@cindex Bison declarations
4684
4685The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4686used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4687@xref{Symbols}.
4688
4689All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4690@code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4691declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4692value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4693
4694The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4695default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4696must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4697and Context-Free Grammars}).
4698
4699@menu
4700* Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4701* Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4702* Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4703* Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4704* Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4705* Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4706* Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4707* Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4708* Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4709* Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4710* Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4711* Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4712* %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4713* %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4714@end menu
4715
4716@node Require Decl
4717@subsection Require a Version of Bison
4718@cindex version requirement
4719@cindex requiring a version of Bison
4720@findex %require
4721
4722You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4723the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4724status 63).
4725
4726@example
4727%require "@var{version}"
4728@end example
4729
4730@node Token Decl
4731@subsection Token Type Names
4732@cindex declaring token type names
4733@cindex token type names, declaring
4734@cindex declaring literal string tokens
4735@findex %token
4736
4737The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4738
4739@example
4740%token @var{name}
4741@end example
4742
4743Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4744the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4745can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4746
4747Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4748@code{%precedence}, or
4749@code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4750associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4751Precedence}.
4752
4753You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4754a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4755following the token name:
4756
4757@example
4758%token NUM 300
4759%token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4760@end example
4761
4762@noindent
4763It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4764all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4765with each other or with normal characters.
4766
4767In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4768@code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4769alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4770Than One Value Type}).
4771
4772For example:
4773
4774@example
4775@group
4776%union @{ /* define stack type */
4777 double val;
4778 symrec *tptr;
4779@}
4780%token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4781@end group
4782@end example
4783
4784You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4785writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4786declaration which declares the name. For example:
4787
4788@example
4789%token arrow "=>"
4790@end example
4791
4792@noindent
4793For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4794equivalent literal string tokens:
4795
4796@example
4797%token <operator> OR "||"
4798%token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4799%left OR "<="
4800@end example
4801
4802@noindent
4803Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4804interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4805@code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4806obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4807Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4808the literal string instead of the token name.
4809
4810The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4811allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4812of ``$end'':
4813
4814@example
4815%token END 0 "end of file"
4816@end example
4817
4818@node Precedence Decl
4819@subsection Operator Precedence
4820@cindex precedence declarations
4821@cindex declaring operator precedence
4822@cindex operator precedence, declaring
4823
4824Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4825@code{%precedence} declaration to
4826declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4827once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4828@xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4829operator precedence.
4830
4831The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4832@code{%token}: either
4833
4834@example
4835%left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4836@end example
4837
4838@noindent
4839or
4840
4841@example
4842%left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4843@end example
4844
4845And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4846But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4847all the @var{symbols}:
4848
4849@itemize @bullet
4850@item
4851The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4852of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4853@var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4854grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4855left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4856@code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4857@var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4858means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4859considered a syntax error.
4860
4861@code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4862defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4863and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4864
4865@item
4866The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4867All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4868precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4869When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4870the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4871@end itemize
4872
4873For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4874argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4875Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4876A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4877separate token.
4878For example:
4879
4880@example
4881%left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4882%left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4883@end example
4884
4885@node Type Decl
4886@subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4887@cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4888@cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4889@findex %type
4890
4891@noindent
4892When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4893declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4894used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4895
4896@example
4897%type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4898@end example
4899
4900@noindent
4901Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4902@var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4903that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}). You
4904can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4905declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4906the symbol names.
4907
4908You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4909use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4910terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4911@code{<@var{type}>}.
4912
4913@node Initial Action Decl
4914@subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4915@findex %initial-action
4916
4917Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4918parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4919code.
4920
4921@deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4922@findex %initial-action
4923Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4924@code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4925@code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4926lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4927@end deffn
4928
4929For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4930
4931@example
4932%parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4933%initial-action
4934@{
4935 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4936@};
4937@end example
4938
4939
4940@node Destructor Decl
4941@subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4942@cindex freeing discarded symbols
4943@findex %destructor
4944@findex <*>
4945@findex <>
4946During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4947on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4948until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4949or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4950symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4951must discard the start symbol.
4952
4953When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4954lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4955in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4956protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4957
4958The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4959symbol is automatically discarded.
4960
4961@deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4962@findex %destructor
4963Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4964@var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4965designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4966@code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4967also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4968@code{yyparse}}).
4969
4970When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4971per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4972You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4973tag among @var{symbols}.
4974In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4975grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4976per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4977
4978Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4979(These default forms are experimental.
4980More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4981features.)
4982You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4983exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4984The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4985discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4986@code{%destructor}.
4987The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4988symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4989counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4990The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4991symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4992@end deffn
4993
4994@noindent
4995For example:
4996
4997@example
4998%union @{ char *string; @}
4999%token <string> STRING1 STRING2
5000%type <string> string1 string2
5001%union @{ char character; @}
5002%token <character> CHR
5003%type <character> chr
5004%token TAGLESS
5005
5006%destructor @{ @} <character>
5007%destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
5008%destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
5009%destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
5010@end example
5011
5012@noindent
5013guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
5014semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
5015to @code{free} by default.
5016However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
5017prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
5018It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
5019@code{free} only once.
5020Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
5021such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
5022
5023A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
5024user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
5025For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
5026@code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
5027@code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
5028none of which you can reference in your grammar.
5029It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
5030Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
5031reference it in your grammar.
5032However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
5033redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
5034
5035@example
5036%token END 0
5037@end example
5038
5039@cindex actions in mid-rule
5040@cindex mid-rule actions
5041Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
5042mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
5043That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
5044do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
5045(where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
5046any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
5047Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
5048it discards the mid-rule symbol.
5049
5050@ignore
5051@noindent
5052In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
5053nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
5054In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
5055@end ignore
5056
5057@sp 1
5058
5059@cindex discarded symbols
5060@dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
5061
5062@itemize
5063@item
5064stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
5065@item
5066incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
5067@item
5068the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
5069right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
5070@item
5071the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
5072side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
5073@code{parse},
5074@item
5075the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
5076@end itemize
5077
5078The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
5079@code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
5080exhaustion.
5081
5082Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
5083error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
5084of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
5085the memory.
5086
5087@node Printer Decl
5088@subsection Printing Semantic Values
5089@cindex printing semantic values
5090@findex %printer
5091@findex <*>
5092@findex <>
5093When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
5094the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
5095in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
5096know how semantic values should be formatted.
5097
5098The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
5099reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
5100Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
5101
5102@deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
5103@findex %printer
5104@vindex yyoutput
5105@c This is the same text as for %destructor.
5106Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
5107@var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
5108(a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
5109@code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
5110symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
5111also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
5112@code{yyparse}}).
5113
5114The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
5115Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
5116@samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
5117typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
5118@samp{<>}).
5119@end deffn
5120
5121@noindent
5122For example:
5123
5124@example
5125%union @{ char *string; @}
5126%token <string> STRING1 STRING2
5127%type <string> string1 string2
5128%union @{ char character; @}
5129%token <character> CHR
5130%type <character> chr
5131%token TAGLESS
5132
5133%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
5134%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
5135%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
5136%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
5137@end example
5138
5139@noindent
5140guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
5141tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
5142value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
5143@code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
5144only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
5145Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
5146that has no semantic type tag. See also
5147
5148
5149@node Expect Decl
5150@subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
5151@cindex suppressing conflict warnings
5152@cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
5153@cindex warnings, preventing
5154@cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
5155@findex %expect
5156@findex %expect-rr
5157
5158Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
5159(@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
5160have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
5161way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
5162the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
5163changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
5164
5165The declaration looks like this:
5166
5167@example
5168%expect @var{n}
5169@end example
5170
5171Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
5172be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
5173Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
5174from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
5175
5176For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
5177serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
5178reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
5179parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
5180there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
5181also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
5182in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
5183
5184@example
5185%expect-rr @var{n}
5186@end example
5187
5188In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
5189
5190@itemize @bullet
5191@item
5192Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
5193to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
5194print the number of conflicts.
5195
5196@item
5197Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
5198resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
5199go back to the beginning.
5200
5201@item
5202Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
5203number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
5204@code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
5205@end itemize
5206
5207Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
5208but will keep silent otherwise.
5209
5210@node Start Decl
5211@subsection The Start-Symbol
5212@cindex declaring the start symbol
5213@cindex start symbol, declaring
5214@cindex default start symbol
5215@findex %start
5216
5217Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
5218nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
5219may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
5220
5221@example
5222%start @var{symbol}
5223@end example
5224
5225@node Pure Decl
5226@subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
5227@cindex reentrant parser
5228@cindex pure parser
5229@findex %define api.pure
5230
5231A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
5232execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
5233code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
5234for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
5235handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
5236program must be called only within interlocks.
5237
5238Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
5239suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
5240standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
5241statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
5242including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
5243
5244Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
5245declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
5246reentrant. It looks like this:
5247
5248@example
5249%define api.pure full
5250@end example
5251
5252The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
5253@code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
5254calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
5255@code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
5256Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
5257becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
5258of @code{yypstate} in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5259Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
5260@code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
5261
5262Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
5263You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
5264valid grammar.
5265
5266@node Push Decl
5267@subsection A Push Parser
5268@cindex push parser
5269@cindex push parser
5270@findex %define api.push-pull
5271
5272(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5273More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5274
5275A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
5276is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
5277each time a new token is made available.
5278
5279A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5280main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5281a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5282within a certain time period.
5283
5284Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5285The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5286parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5287
5288@example
5289%define api.push-pull push
5290@end example
5291
5292In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5293a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5294time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5295compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5296what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5297
5298@example
5299%define api.pure full
5300%define api.push-pull push
5301@end example
5302
5303There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5304and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5305many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5306An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5307
5308When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5309the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5310parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5311function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5312will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5313Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5314token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5315of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5316
5317@example
5318int status;
5319yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5320do @{
5321 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5322@} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5323yypstate_delete (ps);
5324@end example
5325
5326If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5327the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5328a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5329For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5330changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5331example would thus look like this:
5332
5333@example
5334extern int yychar;
5335int status;
5336yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5337do @{
5338 yychar = yylex ();
5339 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5340@} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5341yypstate_delete (ps);
5342@end example
5343
5344That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5345for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5346
5347Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5348interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5349you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5350@samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5351the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5352and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5353would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5354generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5355This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5356@samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5357@code{yyparse} function. If the user
5358calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5359stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5360and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5361to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5362write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5363for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5364like this:
5365
5366@example
5367yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5368yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5369yypstate_delete (ps);
5370@end example
5371
5372Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5373the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5374@samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5375
5376@node Decl Summary
5377@subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5378@cindex Bison declaration summary
5379@cindex declaration summary
5380@cindex summary, Bison declaration
5381
5382Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5383
5384@deffn {Directive} %union
5385Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5386(@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}).
5387@end deffn
5388
5389@deffn {Directive} %token
5390Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5391or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5392@end deffn
5393
5394@deffn {Directive} %right
5395Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5396(@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5397@end deffn
5398
5399@deffn {Directive} %left
5400Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5401(@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5402@end deffn
5403
5404@deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5405Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5406(@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5407Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5408@end deffn
5409
5410@ifset defaultprec
5411@deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5412Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5413(@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5414@end deffn
5415@end ifset
5416
5417@deffn {Directive} %type
5418Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5419(@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5420@end deffn
5421
5422@deffn {Directive} %start
5423Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5424Start-Symbol}).
5425@end deffn
5426
5427@deffn {Directive} %expect
5428Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5429(@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5430@end deffn
5431
5432
5433@sp 1
5434@noindent
5435In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5436directives:
5437
5438@deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5439@deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5440@findex %code
5441Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5442default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5443@xref{%code Summary}.
5444@end deffn
5445
5446@deffn {Directive} %debug
5447Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5448parse.trace}.
5449@xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5450@end deffn
5451
5452@deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5453@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5454@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
5455@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5456Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5457@end deffn
5458
5459@deffn {Directive} %defines
5460Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5461type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5462If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5463the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5464
5465For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5466@code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5467@code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5468you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5469Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5470have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5471Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5472definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5473a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5474other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5475
5476Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5477@code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5478(Reentrant) Parser}.
5479
5480If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5481@code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5482@code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5483
5484This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5485definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5486@code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5487above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5488Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5489
5490@findex %code requires
5491@findex %code provides
5492If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5493header also contains their code.
5494@xref{%code Summary}.
5495
5496@cindex Header guard
5497The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5498preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5499@var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5500,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5501uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5502single underscore.
5503
5504For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix @{calc@}} and @samp{%defines
5505"lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5506@example
5507#ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5508# define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5509...
5510#endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5511@end example
5512@end deffn
5513
5514@deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5515Same as above, but save in the file @file{@var{defines-file}}.
5516@end deffn
5517
5518@deffn {Directive} %destructor
5519Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5520discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5521@end deffn
5522
5523@deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5524Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5525are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5526@end deffn
5527
5528@deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5529Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5530supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5531@var{language} is case-insensitive.
5532
5533@end deffn
5534
5535@deffn {Directive} %locations
5536Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5537,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5538the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5539grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5540accurate syntax error messages.
5541@end deffn
5542
5543@deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5544Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5545@var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5546in C parsers
5547is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5548@code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5549(if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5550@code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5551@code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5552also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5553names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5554For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5555section.
5556@xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5557@end deffn
5558
5559@ifset defaultprec
5560@deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5561Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5562modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5563Precedence}).
5564@end deffn
5565@end ifset
5566
5567@deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5568Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5569implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5570parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5571associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5572file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5573implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5574own right.
5575@end deffn
5576
5577@deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5578Generate the parser implementation in @file{@var{file}}.
5579@end deffn
5580
5581@deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5582Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5583Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5584unreasonable usage.
5585@end deffn
5586
5587@deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5588Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5589Require a Version of Bison}.
5590@end deffn
5591
5592@deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5593Specify the skeleton to use.
5594
5595@c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5596@c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5597@c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5598@c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5599
5600If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5601file in the Bison installation directory.
5602If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5603directory of the grammar file.
5604This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5605@end deffn
5606
5607@deffn {Directive} %token-table
5608Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5609The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5610the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5611@var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5612predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5613@code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5614grammar file.
5615
5616The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5617the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5618strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5619escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5620@code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5621@code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5622corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5623@code{"\"\\\\/\""}.
5624
5625When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5626definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5627@code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5628
5629@table @code
5630@item YYNTOKENS
5631The highest token number, plus one.
5632@item YYNNTS
5633The number of nonterminal symbols.
5634@item YYNRULES
5635The number of grammar rules,
5636@item YYNSTATES
5637The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5638@end table
5639@end deffn
5640
5641@deffn {Directive} %verbose
5642Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5643parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5644that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5645information.
5646@end deffn
5647
5648@deffn {Directive} %yacc
5649Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5650including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5651@end deffn
5652
5653
5654@node %define Summary
5655@subsection %define Summary
5656
5657There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5658assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5659such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5660@code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5661features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5662@code{%define} directive:
5663
5664@deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5665@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5666@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
5667@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5668Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5669
5670The type of the values depend on the syntax. Braces denote value in the
5671target language (e.g., a namespace, a type, etc.). Keyword values (no
5672delimiters) denote finite choice (e.g., a variation of a feature). String
5673values denote remaining cases (e.g., a file name).
5674
5675It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define} multiple
5676times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5677@end deffn
5678
5679The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5680@code{%define} accepts.
5681
5682Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5683complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5684four conditions:
5685
5686@enumerate
5687@item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5688
5689@item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5690This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5691
5692@item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5693
5694@item @var{variable} is never defined.
5695In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5696@end enumerate
5697
5698What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5699values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5700skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5701Summary,,%skeleton}).
5702Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5703Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are described below.
5704
5705@c ================================================== api.namespace
5706@deffn Directive {%define api.namespace} @{@var{namespace}@}
5707@itemize
5708@item Languages(s): C++
5709
5710@item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5711For example, if you specify:
5712
5713@example
5714%define api.namespace @{foo::bar@}
5715@end example
5716
5717Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5718
5719@example
5720foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5721@end example
5722
5723However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5724splits on any remaining occurrences:
5725
5726@example
5727namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5728 class position;
5729 class location;
5730@} @}
5731@end example
5732
5733@item Accepted Values:
5734Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5735@code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5736
5737@item Default Value:
5738The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5739This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5740be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5741for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5742@code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5743api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5744lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5745
5746@example
5747%define api.namespace @{foo@}
5748%name-prefix "bar::"
5749@end example
5750
5751The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5752@code{bar::lex}.
5753@end itemize
5754@end deffn
5755@c api.namespace
5756
5757@c ================================================== api.location.type
5758@deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @{@var{type}@}
5759
5760@itemize @bullet
5761@item Language(s): C++, Java
5762
5763@item Purpose: Define the location type.
5764@xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5765
5766@item Accepted Values: String
5767
5768@item Default Value: none
5769
5770@item History:
5771Introduced in Bison 2.7 for C, C++ and Java. Introduced under the name
5772@code{location_type} for C++ in Bison 2.5 and for Java in Bison 2.4.
5773@end itemize
5774@end deffn
5775
5776@c ================================================== api.prefix
5777@deffn {Directive} {%define api.prefix} @{@var{prefix}@}
5778
5779@itemize @bullet
5780@item Language(s): All
5781
5782@item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5783@xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5784
5785@item Accepted Values: String
5786
5787@item Default Value: @code{yy}
5788
5789@item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5790@end itemize
5791@end deffn
5792
5793@c ================================================== api.pure
5794@deffn Directive {%define api.pure} @var{purity}
5795
5796@itemize @bullet
5797@item Language(s): C
5798
5799@item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5800@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5801
5802@item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5803
5804The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5805the case for Boolean values.
5806
5807When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5808changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5809@code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5810below.
5811
5812The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5813difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5814@code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5815
5816I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5817@code{yyerror} are:
5818
5819@example
5820void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5821void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5822@end example
5823
5824But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5825used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5826
5827@example
5828void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5829@end example
5830
5831(@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5832Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5833
5834@item Default Value: @code{false}
5835
5836@item History:
5837the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5838@end itemize
5839@end deffn
5840@c api.pure
5841
5842
5843
5844@c ================================================== api.push-pull
5845@deffn Directive {%define api.push-pull} @var{kind}
5846
5847@itemize @bullet
5848@item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5849
5850@item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5851@xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5852(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5853More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5854
5855@item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5856
5857@item Default Value: @code{pull}
5858@end itemize
5859@end deffn
5860@c api.push-pull
5861
5862
5863
5864@c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5865@deffn Directive {%define api.token.constructor}
5866
5867@itemize @bullet
5868@item Language(s):
5869C++
5870
5871@item Purpose:
5872When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5873request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5874location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5875
5876@item Accepted Values:
5877Boolean.
5878
5879@item Default Value:
5880@code{false}
5881@item History:
5882introduced in Bison 3.0
5883@end itemize
5884@end deffn
5885@c api.token.constructor
5886
5887
5888@c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5889@deffn Directive {%define api.token.prefix} @{@var{prefix}@}
5890
5891@itemize
5892@item Languages(s): all
5893
5894@item Purpose:
5895Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5896target language. For instance
5897
5898@example
5899%token FILE for ERROR
5900%define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
5901%%
5902start: FILE for ERROR;
5903@end example
5904
5905@noindent
5906generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5907and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5908scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5909may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5910generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5911@file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix.
5912
5913Bison also prefixes the generated member names of the semantic value union.
5914@xref{Type Generation,, Generating the Semantic Value Type}, for more
5915details.
5916
5917See @ref{Calc++ Parser} and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5918
5919@item Accepted Values:
5920Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5921in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5922letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5923
5924@item Default Value:
5925empty
5926@item History:
5927introduced in Bison 3.0
5928@end itemize
5929@end deffn
5930@c api.token.prefix
5931
5932
5933@c ================================================== api.value.type
5934@deffn Directive {%define api.value.type} @var{support}
5935@deffnx Directive {%define api.value.type} @{@var{type}@}
5936@itemize @bullet
5937@item Language(s):
5938all
5939
5940@item Purpose:
5941The type for semantic values.
5942
5943@item Accepted Values:
5944@table @asis
5945@item @samp{@{@}}
5946This grammar has no semantic value at all. This is not properly supported
5947yet.
5948@item @samp{union-directive} (C, C++)
5949The type is defined thanks to the @code{%union} directive. You don't have
5950to define @code{api.value.type} in that case, using @code{%union} suffices.
5951@xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
5952For instance:
5953@example
5954%define api.value.type union-directive
5955%union
5956@{
5957 int ival;
5958 char *sval;
5959@}
5960%token <ival> INT "integer"
5961%token <sval> STR "string"
5962@end example
5963
5964@item @samp{union} (C, C++)
5965The symbols are defined with type names, from which Bison will generate a
5966@code{union}. For instance:
5967@example
5968%define api.value.type union
5969%token <int> INT "integer"
5970%token <char *> STR "string"
5971@end example
5972This feature needs user feedback to stabilize. Note that most C++ objects
5973cannot be stored in a @code{union}.
5974
5975@item @samp{variant} (C++)
5976This is similar to @code{union}, but special storage techniques are used to
5977allow any kind of C++ object to be used. For instance:
5978@example
5979%define api.value.type variant
5980%token <int> INT "integer"
5981%token <std::string> STR "string"
5982@end example
5983This feature needs user feedback to stabilize.
5984@xref{C++ Variants}.
5985
5986@item @samp{@{@var{type}@}}
5987Use this @var{type} as semantic value.
5988@example
5989%code requires
5990@{
5991 struct my_value
5992 @{
5993 enum
5994 @{
5995 is_int, is_str
5996 @} kind;
5997 union
5998 @{
5999 int ival;
6000 char *sval;
6001 @} u;
6002 @};
6003@}
6004%define api.value.type @{struct my_value@}
6005%token <u.ival> INT "integer"
6006%token <u.sval> STR "string"
6007@end example
6008@end table
6009
6010@item Default Value:
6011@itemize @minus
6012@item
6013@code{%union} if @code{%union} is used, otherwise @dots{}
6014@item
6015@code{int} if type tags are used (i.e., @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} or
6016@samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} is used), otherwise @dots{}
6017@item
6018@code{""}
6019@end itemize
6020
6021@item History:
6022introduced in Bison 3.0. Was introduced for Java only in 2.3b as
6023@code{stype}.
6024@end itemize
6025@end deffn
6026@c api.value.type
6027
6028
6029@c ================================================== location_type
6030@deffn Directive {%define location_type}
6031Obsoleted by @code{api.location.type} since Bison 2.7.
6032@end deffn
6033
6034
6035@c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
6036
6037@deffn Directive {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{when}
6038
6039@itemize @bullet
6040@item Language(s): all
6041
6042@item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
6043contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
6044specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
6045feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6046
6047@item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
6048@item Default Value:
6049@itemize
6050@item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
6051@item @code{most} otherwise.
6052@end itemize
6053@item History:
6054introduced as @code{lr.default-reductions} in 2.5, renamed as
6055@code{lr.default-reduction} in 3.0.
6056@end itemize
6057@end deffn
6058
6059@c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
6060
6061@deffn Directive {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state}
6062
6063@itemize @bullet
6064@item Language(s): all
6065@item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
6066remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
6067@item Accepted Values: Boolean
6068@item Default Value: @code{false}
6069@item History:
6070introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
6071@code{lr.keep-unreachable-states} in 2.5, and as
6072@code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 3.0.
6073@end itemize
6074@end deffn
6075@c lr.keep-unreachable-state
6076
6077@c ================================================== lr.type
6078
6079@deffn Directive {%define lr.type} @var{type}
6080
6081@itemize @bullet
6082@item Language(s): all
6083
6084@item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
6085LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
6086More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6087
6088@item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
6089
6090@item Default Value: @code{lalr}
6091@end itemize
6092@end deffn
6093
6094@c ================================================== namespace
6095@deffn Directive %define namespace @{@var{namespace}@}
6096Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
6097@c namespace
6098@end deffn
6099
6100@c ================================================== parse.assert
6101@deffn Directive {%define parse.assert}
6102
6103@itemize
6104@item Languages(s): C++
6105
6106@item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
6107In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
6108constructed and
6109destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
6110
6111@item Accepted Values: Boolean
6112
6113@item Default Value: @code{false}
6114@end itemize
6115@end deffn
6116@c parse.assert
6117
6118
6119@c ================================================== parse.error
6120@deffn Directive {%define parse.error} @var{verbosity}
6121@itemize
6122@item Languages(s):
6123all
6124@item Purpose:
6125Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
6126function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
6127@code{yyerror}}.
6128@item Accepted Values:
6129@itemize
6130@item @code{simple}
6131Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
6132error"}}.
6133@item @code{verbose}
6134Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
6135However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
6136(@pxref{LAC}).
6137@end itemize
6138
6139@item Default Value:
6140@code{simple}
6141@end itemize
6142@end deffn
6143@c parse.error
6144
6145
6146@c ================================================== parse.lac
6147@deffn Directive {%define parse.lac} @var{when}
6148
6149@itemize
6150@item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
6151
6152@item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
6153syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
6154@item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
6155@item Default Value: @code{none}
6156@end itemize
6157@end deffn
6158@c parse.lac
6159
6160@c ================================================== parse.trace
6161@deffn Directive {%define parse.trace}
6162
6163@itemize
6164@item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
6165
6166@item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
6167@xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
6168
6169In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
6170@samp{%define api.prefix @{@var{prefix}@}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
6171,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
6172file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
6173compiled.
6174
6175@item Accepted Values: Boolean
6176
6177@item Default Value: @code{false}
6178@end itemize
6179@end deffn
6180@c parse.trace
6181
6182@node %code Summary
6183@subsection %code Summary
6184@findex %code
6185@cindex Prologue
6186
6187The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
6188parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
6189as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
6190prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
6191functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
6192supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
6193@code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
6194is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
6195
6196@deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
6197This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
6198inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
6199in the parser implementation.
6200
6201For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
6202after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
6203unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
6204
6205For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
6206@end deffn
6207
6208@deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
6209This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
6210@var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
6211location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
6212specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
6213default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
6214this form instead.
6215@end deffn
6216
6217For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
6218multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
6219the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
6220file.
6221
6222Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
6223qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
6224
6225@table @code
6226@item requires
6227@findex %code requires
6228
6229@itemize @bullet
6230@item Language(s): C, C++
6231
6232@item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
6233@code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}. In other words, it's the best place to
6234define types referenced in @code{%union} directives. If you use
6235@code{#define} to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6236definitions, then it is also the best place. However you should rather
6237@code{%define} @code{api.value.type} and @code{api.location.type}.
6238
6239@item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
6240before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6241definitions.
6242@end itemize
6243
6244@item provides
6245@findex %code provides
6246
6247@itemize @bullet
6248@item Language(s): C, C++
6249
6250@item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
6251declarations that should be provided to other modules.
6252
6253@item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
6254file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
6255token definitions.
6256@end itemize
6257
6258@item top
6259@findex %code top
6260
6261@itemize @bullet
6262@item Language(s): C, C++
6263
6264@item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
6265should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
6266occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
6267parser implementation file. For example:
6268
6269@example
6270%code top @{
6271 #define _GNU_SOURCE
6272 #include <stdio.h>
6273@}
6274@end example
6275
6276@item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
6277@end itemize
6278
6279@item imports
6280@findex %code imports
6281
6282@itemize @bullet
6283@item Language(s): Java
6284
6285@item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
6286
6287@item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
6288before any class definitions.
6289@end itemize
6290@end table
6291
6292Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
6293technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
6294however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
6295of the standard Bison skeletons.
6296
6297
6298@node Multiple Parsers
6299@section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
6300
6301Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
6302only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
6303with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
6304different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
6305@code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
6306also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
6307exported in the generated header.
6308
6309The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
6310@code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
6311headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
6312can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
6313@{@var{prefix}@}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@{@var{prefix}@}}, see
6314@ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
6315variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
6316@samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
6317upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
6318
6319The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
6320@code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
6321@code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
6322@code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
6323@code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
6324@code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
6325specifically --- more about this below.
6326
6327For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix @{c@}}, the names become
6328@code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
6329on.
6330
6331The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
6332In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
6333beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
6334@code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
6335
6336@example
6337#define YYSTYPE CTYPE
6338#define yyparse cparse
6339#define yylval clval
6340...
6341YYSTYPE yylval;
6342int yyparse (void);
6343@end example
6344
6345This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
6346implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
6347@code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
6348
6349However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
6350instance:
6351
6352@example
6353extern CSTYPE clval;
6354int cparse (void);
6355@end example
6356
6357The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
6358parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
6359@code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
6360
6361@example
6362/* Debug traces. */
6363#ifndef CDEBUG
6364# if defined YYDEBUG
6365# if YYDEBUG
6366# define CDEBUG 1
6367# else
6368# define CDEBUG 0
6369# endif
6370# else
6371# define CDEBUG 0
6372# endif
6373#endif
6374#if CDEBUG
6375extern int cdebug;
6376#endif
6377@end example
6378
6379@sp 2
6380
6381Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
6382the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
6383Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
6384
6385@node Interface
6386@chapter Parser C-Language Interface
6387@cindex C-language interface
6388@cindex interface
6389
6390The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
6391describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
6392functions that it needs to use.
6393
6394Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
6395@samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
6396identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
6397in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6398
6399@menu
6400* Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6401* Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6402* Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6403* Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6404* Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6405* Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6406 which reads tokens.
6407* Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6408* Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6409* Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6410 native language.
6411@end menu
6412
6413@node Parser Function
6414@section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6415@findex yyparse
6416
6417You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6418function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6419encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6420write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6421without reading further.
6422
6423
6424@deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6425The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6426is due to end-of-input).
6427
6428The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6429that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6430invoked.
6431
6432The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6433@end deftypefun
6434
6435In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6436these macros:
6437
6438@defmac YYACCEPT
6439@findex YYACCEPT
6440Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6441@end defmac
6442
6443@defmac YYABORT
6444@findex YYABORT
6445Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6446@end defmac
6447
6448If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6449parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6450declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6451
6452@deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6453@findex %parse-param
6454Declare that one or more
6455@var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6456The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6457functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6458@var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6459@end deffn
6460
6461Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6462
6463@example
6464%parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6465@end example
6466
6467@noindent
6468Then call the parser like this:
6469
6470@example
6471@{
6472 int nastiness, randomness;
6473 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6474 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6475 @dots{}
6476@}
6477@end example
6478
6479@noindent
6480In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6481
6482@example
6483exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6484@end example
6485
6486@noindent
6487Using the following:
6488@example
6489%parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6490@end example
6491
6492Results in these signatures:
6493@example
6494void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
6495int yyparse (int *randomness);
6496@end example
6497
6498@noindent
6499Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
6500and @code{%locations} are used:
6501
6502@example
6503void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
6504int yyparse (int *randomness);
6505@end example
6506
6507@node Push Parser Function
6508@section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6509@findex yypush_parse
6510
6511(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6512More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6513
6514You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6515function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6516@samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6517@xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6518
6519@deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6520The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6521the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6522required to finish parsing the grammar.
6523@end deftypefun
6524
6525@node Pull Parser Function
6526@section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6527@findex yypull_parse
6528
6529(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6530More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6531
6532You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6533stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6534declaration is used.
6535@xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6536
6537@deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6538The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6539@end deftypefun
6540
6541@node Parser Create Function
6542@section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6543@findex yypstate_new
6544
6545(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6546More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6547
6548You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6549This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6550@samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6551@xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6552
6553@deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6554The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6555or 0 if no memory was available.
6556In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6557allocated.
6558@end deftypefun
6559
6560@node Parser Delete Function
6561@section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6562@findex yypstate_delete
6563
6564(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6565More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6566
6567You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6568function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6569@samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6570@xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6571
6572@deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6573This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6574After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6575@end deftypefun
6576
6577@node Lexical
6578@section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6579@findex yylex
6580@cindex lexical analyzer
6581
6582The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6583the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6584this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6585call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6586
6587In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6588Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6589file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6590available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6591Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6592parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6593the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6594Bison}.
6595
6596@menu
6597* Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6598* Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6599 of the token it has read.
6600* Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6601 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6602 actions want that.
6603* Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6604 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6605@end menu
6606
6607@node Calling Convention
6608@subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6609
6610The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6611for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6612signifies end-of-input.
6613
6614When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6615in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6616is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6617use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6618
6619When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6620the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6621So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6622to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6623must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6624signifies end-of-input.
6625
6626Here is an example showing these things:
6627
6628@example
6629int
6630yylex (void)
6631@{
6632 @dots{}
6633 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6634 return 0;
6635 @dots{}
6636 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6637 return c; /* Assume token type for '+' is '+'. */
6638 @dots{}
6639 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6640 @dots{}
6641@}
6642@end example
6643
6644@noindent
6645This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6646utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6647
6648If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6649@code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6650
6651@itemize @bullet
6652@item
6653If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6654literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6655all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6656the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6657
6658@item
6659@code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6660table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6661The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6662double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6663token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6664to Bison.
6665
6666Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6667assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6668@code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6669characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6670
6671@example
6672for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6673 @{
6674 if (yytname[i] != 0
6675 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6676 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6677 strlen (token_buffer))
6678 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6679 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6680 break;
6681 @}
6682@end example
6683
6684The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6685@code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6686@end itemize
6687
6688@node Token Values
6689@subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6690
6691@vindex yylval
6692In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6693be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6694just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6695Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6696@code{yylex}:
6697
6698@example
6699@group
6700 @dots{}
6701 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6702 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6703 @dots{}
6704@end group
6705@end example
6706
6707When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6708made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6709Union Declaration}). So when you store a token's value, you
6710must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6711declaration looks like this:
6712
6713@example
6714@group
6715%union @{
6716 int intval;
6717 double val;
6718 symrec *tptr;
6719@}
6720@end group
6721@end example
6722
6723@noindent
6724then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6725
6726@example
6727@group
6728 @dots{}
6729 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6730 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6731 @dots{}
6732@end group
6733@end example
6734
6735@node Token Locations
6736@subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6737
6738@vindex yylloc
6739If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6740in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6741then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6742@code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6743in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6744data in that variable.
6745
6746By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6747initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6748four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6749@code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6750feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6751
6752@tindex YYLTYPE
6753The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6754
6755@node Pure Calling
6756@subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6757
6758When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6759pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6760and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6761Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6762pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6763shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6764pointers.
6765
6766@example
6767int
6768yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6769@{
6770 @dots{}
6771 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6772 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6773 @dots{}
6774@}
6775@end example
6776
6777If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6778textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6779this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6780only one argument.
6781
6782If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6783@code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6784Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6785@code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6786
6787@deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6788@findex %lex-param
6789Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6790declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6791equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6792@end deffn
6793
6794@deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6795@findex %param
6796Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6797@code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6798@samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6799@{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6800declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6801@end deffn
6802
6803@noindent
6804For instance:
6805
6806@example
6807%lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6808%parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6809%param @{environment_type *env@}
6810@end example
6811
6812@noindent
6813results in the following signatures:
6814
6815@example
6816int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6817int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6818@end example
6819
6820If @samp{%define api.pure full} is added:
6821
6822@example
6823int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6824int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6825@end example
6826
6827@noindent
6828and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure full} and @code{%locations} are
6829used:
6830
6831@example
6832int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6833 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6834int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6835@end example
6836
6837@node Error Reporting
6838@section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6839@cindex error reporting function
6840@findex yyerror
6841@cindex parse error
6842@cindex syntax error
6843
6844The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6845whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6846action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6847macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6848in Actions}).
6849
6850The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6851reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6852called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6853receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6854@w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6855
6856@findex %define parse.error
6857If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6858section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6859Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6860just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6861contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6862
6863The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6864can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6865nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6866parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6867if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6868fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6869
6870In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6871translated automatically from English to some other language before
6872they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6873
6874The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6875
6876@example
6877@group
6878void
6879yyerror (char const *s)
6880@{
6881@end group
6882@group
6883 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6884@}
6885@end group
6886@end example
6887
6888After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6889error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6890(@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6891immediately return 1.
6892
6893Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6894an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6895indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6896historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6897prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6898
6899When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6900following signature:
6901
6902@example
6903void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6904@end example
6905
6906@noindent
6907The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6908uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6909value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6910Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6911message is always passed last.
6912
6913Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6914ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6915preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6916@code{yyerror}.
6917
6918@vindex yynerrs
6919The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6920reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6921request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6922then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6923
6924@node Action Features
6925@section Special Features for Use in Actions
6926@cindex summary, action features
6927@cindex action features summary
6928
6929Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6930are useful in actions.
6931
6932@deffn {Variable} $$
6933Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6934grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6935@end deffn
6936
6937@deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6938Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6939@var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6940@end deffn
6941
6942@deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6943Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6944specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6945Types of Values in Actions}.
6946@end deffn
6947
6948@deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6949Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6950union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6951@xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6952@end deffn
6953
6954@deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6955Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6956@xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6957@end deffn
6958
6959@deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6960Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6961@xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6962@end deffn
6963
6964@deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6965@findex YYBACKUP
6966Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6967a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6968It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6969It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6970semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6971going to be reduced by this rule.
6972
6973If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6974a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6975a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6976recovery.
6977
6978In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6979@end deffn
6980
6981@deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6982Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6983@end deffn
6984
6985@deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6986Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6987stream.
6988@end deffn
6989
6990@deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6991Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6992recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6993does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6994want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6995the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6996@end deffn
6997
6998@deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6999@findex YYRECOVERING
7000The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7001is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7002@xref{Error Recovery}.
7003@end deffn
7004
7005@deffn {Variable} yychar
7006Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
7007lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
7008has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
7009Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7010Actions}).
7011@xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
7012@end deffn
7013
7014@deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
7015Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
7016error rules.
7017Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
7018Semantic Actions}).
7019@xref{Error Recovery}.
7020@end deffn
7021
7022@deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
7023Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
7024errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
7025@xref{Error Recovery}.
7026@end deffn
7027
7028@deffn {Variable} yylloc
7029Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
7030to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
7031Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7032Actions}).
7033@xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
7034@end deffn
7035
7036@deffn {Variable} yylval
7037Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
7038not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
7039Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7040Actions}).
7041@xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
7042@end deffn
7043
7044@deffn {Value} @@$
7045Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
7046location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
7047Locations}.
7048
7049@c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
7050
7051@c @example
7052@c struct @{
7053@c int first_line, last_line;
7054@c int first_column, last_column;
7055@c @};
7056@c @end example
7057
7058@c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
7059@c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
7060
7061@c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
7062@c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
7063@c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
7064@c those members.
7065
7066@c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
7067@end deffn
7068
7069@deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
7070@findex @@@var{n}
7071Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
7072location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
7073Locations}.
7074@end deffn
7075
7076@node Internationalization
7077@section Parser Internationalization
7078@cindex internationalization
7079@cindex i18n
7080@cindex NLS
7081@cindex gettext
7082@cindex bison-po
7083
7084A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
7085tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
7086also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
7087make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
7088@xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
7089For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
7090set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
7091encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
7092installation.
7093
7094The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
7095the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
7096steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
7097GNU Automake.
7098
7099@enumerate
7100@item
7101@cindex bison-i18n.m4
7102Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
7103by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
7104@file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
7105@samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
7106For example:
7107
7108@example
7109cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
7110@end example
7111
7112@item
7113@findex BISON_I18N
7114@vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
7115@vindex YYENABLE_NLS
7116In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
7117invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
7118defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
7119causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
7120@code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
7121symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
7122Bison-generated parser.
7123
7124@item
7125In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
7126containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
7127@samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
7128For example:
7129
7130@example
7131bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
7132@end example
7133
7134Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
7135(PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
7136@samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
7137@file{Makefile}.
7138
7139@item
7140In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
7141function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
7142either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
7143
7144@example
7145DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7146@end example
7147
7148or:
7149
7150@example
7151AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7152@end example
7153
7154@item
7155Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
7156infrastructure.
7157@end enumerate
7158
7159
7160@node Algorithm
7161@chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
7162@cindex Bison parser algorithm
7163@cindex algorithm of parser
7164@cindex shifting
7165@cindex reduction
7166@cindex parser stack
7167@cindex stack, parser
7168
7169As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
7170semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
7171token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
7172
7173For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
7174@samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
7175that was shifted.
7176
7177But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
7178the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
7179grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
7180@dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
7181single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
7182Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
7183is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
7184
7185For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
7186
7187@example
71881 + 5 * 3
7189@end example
7190
7191@noindent
7192and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
7193elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
7194
7195@example
7196expr: expr '*' expr;
7197@end example
7198
7199@noindent
7200Then the stack contains just these three elements:
7201
7202@example
72031 + 15
7204@end example
7205
7206@noindent
7207At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
720816. Then the newline token can be shifted.
7209
7210The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
7211to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
7212(@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
7213
7214This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
7215
7216@menu
7217* Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
7218* Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
7219* Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
7220* Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
7221* Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
7222* Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
7223* Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
7224* Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
7225* Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
7226* Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
7227@end menu
7228
7229@node Lookahead
7230@section Lookahead Tokens
7231@cindex lookahead token
7232
7233The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
7234last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
7235simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
7236reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
7237token in order to decide what to do.
7238
7239When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
7240@dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
7241perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
7242the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
7243should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
7244does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
7245token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
7246application.
7247
7248Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
7249expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
7250factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
7251
7252@example
7253@group
7254expr:
7255 term '+' expr
7256| term
7257;
7258@end group
7259
7260@group
7261term:
7262 '(' expr ')'
7263| term '!'
7264| "number"
7265;
7266@end group
7267@end example
7268
7269Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
7270should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
7271tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
7272course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
7273@w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
7274
7275If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
7276that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
7277parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
7278@code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
7279doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
7280'!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
7281
7282@vindex yychar
7283@vindex yylval
7284@vindex yylloc
7285The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
7286Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
7287@code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
7288@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7289
7290@node Shift/Reduce
7291@section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
7292@cindex conflicts
7293@cindex shift/reduce conflicts
7294@cindex dangling @code{else}
7295@cindex @code{else}, dangling
7296
7297Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
7298statements, with a pair of rules like this:
7299
7300@example
7301@group
7302if_stmt:
7303 "if" expr "then" stmt
7304| "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7305;
7306@end group
7307@end example
7308
7309@noindent
7310Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
7311specific keyword tokens.
7312
7313When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
7314contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
7315reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
7316@code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
7317rule.
7318
7319This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
7320called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
7321these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
7322operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
7323contrast it with the other alternative.
7324
7325Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
7326the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
7327equivalent:
7328
7329@example
7330if x then if y then win; else lose;
7331
7332if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
7333@end example
7334
7335But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
7336result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
7337making these two inputs equivalent:
7338
7339@example
7340if x then if y then win; else lose;
7341
7342if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
7343@end example
7344
7345The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
7346parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
7347convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
7348else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
7349by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
7350write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
7351This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
7352Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
7353
7354To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
7355conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
7356There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
7357is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
7358different number.
7359@xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
7360recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
7361number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
7362possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
7363conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
7364Operators}).
7365
7366The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
7367conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
7368rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
7369the conflict:
7370
7371@example
7372%%
7373@group
7374stmt:
7375 expr
7376| if_stmt
7377;
7378@end group
7379
7380@group
7381if_stmt:
7382 "if" expr "then" stmt
7383| "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7384;
7385@end group
7386
7387expr:
7388 "identifier"
7389;
7390@end example
7391
7392@node Precedence
7393@section Operator Precedence
7394@cindex operator precedence
7395@cindex precedence of operators
7396
7397Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7398expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7399Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7400shift and when to reduce.
7401
7402@menu
7403* Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7404* Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7405* Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7406* Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7407* How Precedence:: How they work.
7408* Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7409@end menu
7410
7411@node Why Precedence
7412@subsection When Precedence is Needed
7413
7414Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7415input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7416
7417@example
7418@group
7419expr:
7420 expr '-' expr
7421| expr '*' expr
7422| expr '<' expr
7423| '(' expr ')'
7424@dots{}
7425;
7426@end group
7427@end example
7428
7429@noindent
7430Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7431should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7432depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7433must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7434token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7435the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7436shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7437different results.
7438
7439To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7440the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7441first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7442The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7443hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7444is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7445reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7446@samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7447@samp{<}.
7448
7449@cindex associativity
7450What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7451@w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7452operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7453The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7454assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7455matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7456contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7457makes right-associativity.
7458
7459@node Using Precedence
7460@subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7461@findex %left
7462@findex %nonassoc
7463@findex %precedence
7464@findex %right
7465
7466Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7467declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7468contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7469associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7470those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7471them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7472declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7473row''.
7474The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7475precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7476associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7477compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7478error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7479directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7480@emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7481what expected the grammar author.
7482
7483The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7484order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7485declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7486precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7487whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7488
7489@node Precedence Only
7490@subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7491@findex %precedence
7492
7493Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7494@code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7495attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7496defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7497conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7498@code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7499related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7500
7501The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7502Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7503in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7504state:
7505
7506@example
7507if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7508@end example
7509
7510The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7511stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7512(@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7513disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7514shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7515higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7516in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7517
7518@example
7519%precedence THEN
7520%precedence ELSE
7521@end example
7522
7523The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7524usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7525Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7526used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7527since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7528traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7529evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7530
7531@node Precedence Examples
7532@subsection Precedence Examples
7533
7534In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7535
7536@example
7537%left '<'
7538%left '-'
7539%left '*'
7540@end example
7541
7542In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7543would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7544declared with @code{'-'}:
7545
7546@example
7547%left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7548%left '+' '-'
7549%left '*' '/'
7550@end example
7551
7552@node How Precedence
7553@subsection How Precedence Works
7554
7555The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7556levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7557precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7558the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7559specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7560Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7561
7562Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7563of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7564token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7565precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7566precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7567precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7568(@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7569resolved.
7570
7571Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7572the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7573
7574@node Non Operators
7575@subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7576
7577Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7578shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7579instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7580Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7581
7582In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7583to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7584for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7585token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7586by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7587instance as follows:
7588
7589@example
7590@group
7591%precedence "then"
7592%precedence "else"
7593@end group
7594@end example
7595
7596Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7597associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7598use right associativity:
7599
7600@example
7601%right "then" "else"
7602@end example
7603
7604Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7605``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7606of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7607Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7608of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7609being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7610else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7611
7612@node Contextual Precedence
7613@section Context-Dependent Precedence
7614@cindex context-dependent precedence
7615@cindex unary operator precedence
7616@cindex precedence, context-dependent
7617@cindex precedence, unary operator
7618@findex %prec
7619
7620Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7621outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7622sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7623somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7624
7625The Bison precedence declarations
7626can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7627only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7628precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7629modifier for rules.
7630
7631The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7632specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7633It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7634modifier's syntax is:
7635
7636@example
7637%prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7638@end example
7639
7640@noindent
7641and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7642assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7643the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7644altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7645are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7646
7647Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7648a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7649are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7650precedence:
7651
7652@example
7653@dots{}
7654%left '+' '-'
7655%left '*'
7656%left UMINUS
7657@end example
7658
7659Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7660
7661@example
7662@group
7663exp:
7664 @dots{}
7665| exp '-' exp
7666 @dots{}
7667| '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7668@end group
7669@end example
7670
7671@ifset defaultprec
7672If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7673minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7674This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7675discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7676
7677The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7678this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7679@code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7680symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7681
7682If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7683for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7684Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7685to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7686explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7687grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7688
7689The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7690@code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7691@end ifset
7692
7693@node Parser States
7694@section Parser States
7695@cindex finite-state machine
7696@cindex parser state
7697@cindex state (of parser)
7698
7699The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7700The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7701represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7702near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7703about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7704
7705Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7706with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7707entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7708specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7709parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7710This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7711the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7712that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7713pushed.
7714
7715There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7716is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7717(@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7718
7719@node Reduce/Reduce
7720@section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7721@cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7722@cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7723
7724A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7725to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7726in the grammar.
7727
7728For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7729of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7730
7731@example
7732@group
7733sequence:
7734 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7735| maybeword
7736| sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7737;
7738@end group
7739
7740@group
7741maybeword:
7742 %empty @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7743| word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7744;
7745@end group
7746@end example
7747
7748@noindent
7749The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7750@code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7751@code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7752Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7753via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7754using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7755
7756There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7757@code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7758or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7759
7760You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7761does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7762affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7763action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7764In this example, the output of the program changes.
7765
7766Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7767appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7768reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7769proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7770
7771@example
7772@group
7773sequence:
7774 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7775| sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7776;
7777@end group
7778@end example
7779
7780Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7781
7782@example
7783@group
7784sequence:
7785 %empty
7786| sequence words
7787| sequence redirects
7788;
7789@end group
7790
7791@group
7792words:
7793 %empty
7794| words word
7795;
7796@end group
7797
7798@group
7799redirects:
7800 %empty
7801| redirects redirect
7802;
7803@end group
7804@end example
7805
7806@noindent
7807The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7808@code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7809@code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7810three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7811in infinitely many ways!
7812
7813Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7814@code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7815@code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7816followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7817
7818Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7819of sequence:
7820
7821@example
7822sequence:
7823 %empty
7824| sequence word
7825| sequence redirect
7826;
7827@end example
7828
7829Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7830from being empty:
7831
7832@example
7833@group
7834sequence:
7835 %empty
7836| sequence words
7837| sequence redirects
7838;
7839@end group
7840
7841@group
7842words:
7843 word
7844| words word
7845;
7846@end group
7847
7848@group
7849redirects:
7850 redirect
7851| redirects redirect
7852;
7853@end group
7854@end example
7855
7856Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7857@samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7858@samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7859@code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7860shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7861directives.
7862
7863To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7864being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7865
7866To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7867@code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7868as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7869@ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7870relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7871rule:
7872
7873@example
7874%precedence "word"
7875%precedence "sequence"
7876%%
7877@group
7878sequence:
7879 %empty
7880| sequence word %prec "sequence"
7881| sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7882;
7883@end group
7884
7885@group
7886words:
7887 word
7888| words "word"
7889;
7890@end group
7891@end example
7892
7893Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7894rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7895
7896@example
7897%right "word" "redirect"
7898%%
7899@group
7900sequence:
7901 %empty
7902| sequence word %prec "word"
7903| sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7904;
7905@end group
7906@end example
7907
7908@node Mysterious Conflicts
7909@section Mysterious Conflicts
7910@cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7911
7912Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7913Here is an example:
7914
7915@example
7916@group
7917%%
7918def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7919param_spec:
7920 type
7921| name_list ':' type
7922;
7923@end group
7924
7925@group
7926return_spec:
7927 type
7928| name ':' type
7929;
7930@end group
7931
7932type: "id";
7933
7934@group
7935name: "id";
7936name_list:
7937 name
7938| name ',' name_list
7939;
7940@end group
7941@end example
7942
7943It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7944lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7945@code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7946@code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7947
7948@cindex LR
7949@cindex LALR
7950However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7951LR(1) grammars.
7952In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7953of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7954@code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7955same.
7956They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7957active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7958a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7959that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7960contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7961the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7962occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7963
7964@cindex IELR
7965@cindex canonical LR
7966For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7967class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7968mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7969is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7970IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7971and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7972details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7973experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7974
7975If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7976can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7977that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7978distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7979@code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7980
7981@example
7982@group
7983@dots{}
7984return_spec:
7985 type
7986| name ':' type
7987| "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7988;
7989@end group
7990@end example
7991
7992This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7993additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7994@code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7995in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7996As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7997the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7998
7999In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
8000rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
8001instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
8002contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
8003@code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
8004rather than the one for @code{name}.
8005
8006@example
8007@group
8008param_spec:
8009 type
8010| name_list ':' type
8011;
8012@end group
8013
8014@group
8015return_spec:
8016 type
8017| "id" ':' type
8018;
8019@end group
8020@end example
8021
8022For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
8023generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
8024
8025@node Tuning LR
8026@section Tuning LR
8027
8028The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
8029historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
8030the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
8031produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
8032Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
8033which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
8034messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
8035
8036In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
8037to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
8038these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
8039Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
8040
8041Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
8042user feedback will help to stabilize them.
8043
8044@menu
8045* LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
8046* Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
8047* LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
8048* Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
8049@end menu
8050
8051@node LR Table Construction
8052@subsection LR Table Construction
8053@cindex Mysterious Conflict
8054@cindex LALR
8055@cindex IELR
8056@cindex canonical LR
8057@findex %define lr.type
8058
8059For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
8060However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
8061As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
8062mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
8063Conflicts}.
8064
8065As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
8066eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
8067Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
8068discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
8069difficult as well.
8070
8071Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
8072mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
8073parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
8074directive.
8075
8076@deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
8077Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
8078values for @var{type} are:
8079
8080@itemize
8081@item @code{lalr} (default)
8082@item @code{ielr}
8083@item @code{canonical-lr}
8084@end itemize
8085
8086(This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8087it.)
8088@end deffn
8089
8090For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
8091grammar file:
8092
8093@example
8094%define lr.type ielr
8095@end example
8096
8097@noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
8098conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
8099comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
8100during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
8101behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
8102continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
8103That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
8104algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
8105LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
8106safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
8107
8108While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
8109or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
8110(@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
8111relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
8112Bison:
8113
8114@itemize
8115@item LALR
8116
8117There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
8118
8119@itemize
8120@item GLR without static conflict resolution.
8121
8122@cindex GLR with LALR
8123When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
8124conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%precedence}),
8125then
8126the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
8127the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
8128the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
8129parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
8130Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
8131more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
8132conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
8133avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
8134
8135@item Malformed grammars.
8136
8137Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
8138major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
8139table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
8140tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
8141differences from IELR and canonical LR.
8142@end itemize
8143
8144@item IELR
8145
8146IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
8147any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
8148always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
8149merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
8150parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
8151More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
8152duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
8153for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
8154significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
8155
8156@item Canonical LR
8157
8158@cindex delayed syntax error detection
8159@cindex LAC
8160@findex %nonassoc
8161While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
8162explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
8163do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
8164left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
8165every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
8166guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
8167that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
8168parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
8169guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
8170any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
8171able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
8172default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
8173@end itemize
8174
8175For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
8176and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
8177@ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
8178
8179@node Default Reductions
8180@subsection Default Reductions
8181@cindex default reductions
8182@findex %define lr.default-reduction
8183@findex %nonassoc
8184
8185After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
8186largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
8187parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
8188to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
8189is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
8190
8191Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
8192also affect the behavior of the parser:
8193
8194@itemize
8195@item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
8196
8197@cindex delayed yylex invocations
8198@cindex consistent states
8199@cindex defaulted states
8200A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
8201action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
8202reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
8203Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
8204invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
8205In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
8206determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
8207token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
8208eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
8209parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
8210parser exhibits the latter behavior.
8211
8212The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
8213designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
8214@code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
8215associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
8216next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
8217For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
8218uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
8219to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
8220should already be considered closed.
8221
8222@item Delayed syntax error detection.
8223
8224@cindex delayed syntax error detection
8225When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
8226whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
8227parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
8228for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
8229the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
8230that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
8231impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
8232Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
8233a later state.
8234
8235@cindex LAC
8236@c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
8237@c sentence from being rejected.
8238While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
8239incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
8240effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
8241anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
8242be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
8243syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
8244@end itemize
8245
8246For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
8247is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
8248no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
8249action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
8250because the accept action ends the parse.
8251
8252For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
8253default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
8254action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
8255delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
8256from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
8257cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
8258versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
8259GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
8260token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
8261split the parse instead.
8262
8263To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
8264@code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
8265
8266@deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{where}
8267Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
8268The accepted values of @var{where} are:
8269@itemize
8270@item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
8271@item @code{consistent}
8272@item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
8273@end itemize
8274
8275(The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
8276experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8277@end deffn
8278
8279@node LAC
8280@subsection LAC
8281@findex %define parse.lac
8282@cindex LAC
8283@cindex lookahead correction
8284
8285Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
8286encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
8287parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
8288reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
8289they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
8290in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
8291encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
8292Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
8293contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
8294
8295The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
8296in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
8297merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
8298Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
8299reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
8300
8301LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
8302that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
8303sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
8304enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
8305
8306@deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
8307Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
8308@itemize
8309@item @code{none} (default)
8310@item @code{full}
8311@end itemize
8312(This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8313it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
8314C.)
8315@end deffn
8316
8317Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
8318fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
8319parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
8320exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
8321During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
8322actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
8323then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
8324an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
8325error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
8326expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
8327in the grammar.
8328
8329There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
8330parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
8331a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
8332next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
8333consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
8334detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
8335token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
8336determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
8337intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
8338while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
8339
8340Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
8341default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
8342exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
8343unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
8344language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
8345LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
8346language-recognition power.
8347
8348There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
8349
8350@itemize
8351@item Infinite parsing loops.
8352
8353IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
8354parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
8355parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
8356it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
8357does.
8358
8359@item Verbose error message limitations.
8360
8361Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
8362limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
8363verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
8364limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
8365increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
8366course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
8367
8368@item Performance.
8369
8370Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
8371performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
8372twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
8373states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
8374parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
8375file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
8376semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
8377parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
8378parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
8379never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
8380has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
8381@end itemize
8382
8383While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
8384parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
8385@pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
8386
8387@node Unreachable States
8388@subsection Unreachable States
8389@findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
8390@cindex unreachable states
8391
8392If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
8393some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
8394state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
8395disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
8396
8397By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8398resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8399keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8400relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8401
8402@deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state} @var{value}
8403Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8404@var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8405@end deffn
8406
8407There are a few caveats to consider:
8408
8409@itemize @bullet
8410@item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8411
8412Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8413other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8414irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8415relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8416parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8417behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8418
8419@item Other useless states.
8420
8421While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8422remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8423reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8424useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8425to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8426it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8427However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8428@end itemize
8429
8430@node Generalized LR Parsing
8431@section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8432@cindex GLR parsing
8433@cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8434@cindex ambiguous grammars
8435@cindex nondeterministic parsing
8436
8437Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8438when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8439based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8440As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8441context-free languages.
8442Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8443sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8444The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8445lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8446decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8447Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8448there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8449summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8450
8451When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8452Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8453Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8454parser uses the same basic
8455algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8456differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8457been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8458reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8459situation, it
8460effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8461shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8462tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8463and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8464a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8465
8466In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8467is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8468the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8469actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8470immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8471get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8472their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8473results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8474when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8475and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8476grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8477stream.
8478
8479Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8480states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8481algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8482At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8483values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8484parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8485has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8486declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8487precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8488rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8489Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8490the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8491
8492It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8493permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8494size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8495LR(1)) grammar in
8496quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8497context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8498uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8499length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8500prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8501grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8502behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8503Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8504doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8505structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8506grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8507deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8508
8509For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
85102000}.
8511
8512@node Memory Management
8513@section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8514@cindex memory exhaustion
8515@cindex memory management
8516@cindex stack overflow
8517@cindex parser stack overflow
8518@cindex overflow of parser stack
8519
8520The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8521not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8522calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8523
8524Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8525usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8526recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8527
8528@vindex YYMAXDEPTH
8529By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8530parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8531macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8532of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8533
8534The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8535large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8536stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8537increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8538you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8539space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8540
8541However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8542arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8543space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8544@code{YYINITDEPTH}.
8545
8546@cindex default stack limit
8547The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
854810000.
8549
8550@vindex YYINITDEPTH
8551You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8552macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8553parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8554unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8555that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8556
8557Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8558
8559You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8560the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8561(@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8562and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8563be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8564non-trivial copy constructors.
8565The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8566new, larger stacks.
8567
8568@node Error Recovery
8569@chapter Error Recovery
8570@cindex error recovery
8571@cindex recovery from errors
8572
8573It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8574error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8575rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8576another expression.
8577
8578In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8579be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8580caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8581@code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8582forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8583deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8584to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8585
8586@findex error
8587You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8588recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8589is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8590handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8591syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8592in the current context, the parse can continue.
8593
8594For example:
8595
8596@example
8597stmts:
8598 %empty
8599| stmts '\n'
8600| stmts exp '\n'
8601| stmts error '\n'
8602@end example
8603
8604The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8605makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8606
8607What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8608error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8609of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8610the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8611and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8612will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8613applicable in the ordinary way.
8614
8615But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8616the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8617and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8618@code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8619already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8620At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8621lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8622tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8623this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8624that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8625possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8626Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8627
8628The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8629error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8630the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8631
8632@example
8633stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8634@end example
8635
8636It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8637opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8638close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8639spurious error message:
8640
8641@example
8642primary:
8643 '(' expr ')'
8644| '(' error ')'
8645@dots{}
8646;
8647@end example
8648
8649Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8650one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8651recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8652@code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8653middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8654from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8655since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8656@code{stmt}.
8657
8658To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8659message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8660after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8661error messages resume.
8662
8663Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8664as any other rules can.
8665
8666@findex yyerrok
8667You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8668@code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8669error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8670@samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8671
8672@findex yyclearin
8673The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8674this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8675this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8676action.
8677@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8678
8679For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8680called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8681once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8682probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8683with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8684
8685@vindex YYRECOVERING
8686The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8687is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8688Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8689error.
8690
8691@node Context Dependency
8692@chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8693
8694The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8695syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8696its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8697(known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8698languages.
8699
8700@menu
8701* Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8702* Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8703* Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8704 error recovery rules must be written.
8705@end menu
8706
8707(Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8708neither clean nor robust.)
8709
8710@node Semantic Tokens
8711@section Semantic Info in Token Types
8712
8713The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8714depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8715
8716@example
8717foo (x);
8718@end example
8719
8720This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8721name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8722parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8723
8724The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8725@code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8726identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8727to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8728declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8729
8730The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8731token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8732but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8733@code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8734is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8735typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8736accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8737
8738This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8739identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8740parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8741redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8742earlier:
8743
8744@example
8745typedef int foo, bar;
8746int baz (void)
8747@group
8748@{
8749 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8750 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8751 return foo (bar);
8752@}
8753@end group
8754@end example
8755
8756Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8757construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8758
8759As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8760all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8761which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8762declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8763duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8764
8765@example
8766@group
8767initdcl:
8768 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8769| declarator maybeasm
8770;
8771@end group
8772
8773@group
8774notype_initdcl:
8775 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8776| notype_declarator maybeasm
8777;
8778@end group
8779@end example
8780
8781@noindent
8782Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8783cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8784@code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8785
8786There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8787(described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8788changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8789here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8790program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8791the syntactic context.
8792
8793@node Lexical Tie-ins
8794@section Lexical Tie-ins
8795@cindex lexical tie-in
8796
8797One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8798which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8799parsed.
8800
8801For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8802construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8803an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8804particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8805as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8806
8807@example
8808@group
8809%@{
8810 int hexflag;
8811 int yylex (void);
8812 void yyerror (char const *);
8813%@}
8814%%
8815@dots{}
8816@end group
8817@group
8818expr:
8819 IDENTIFIER
8820| constant
8821| HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8822 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8823| expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8824@dots{}
8825;
8826@end group
8827
8828@group
8829constant:
8830 INTEGER
8831| STRING
8832;
8833@end group
8834@end example
8835
8836@noindent
8837Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8838it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8839with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8840
8841The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8842file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8843,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8844the flag.
8845
8846@node Tie-in Recovery
8847@section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8848
8849Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8850@xref{Error Recovery}.
8851
8852The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8853abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8854For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8855tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8856
8857@example
8858stmt:
8859 expr ';'
8860| IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8861@dots{}
8862| error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8863;
8864@end example
8865
8866If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8867construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8868completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8869remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8870keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8871
8872To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8873
8874There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8875For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8876and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8877
8878@example
8879@group
8880expr:
8881 @dots{}
8882| '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8883| '(' error ')'
8884@dots{}
8885@end group
8886@end example
8887
8888If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8889that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8890the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8891the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8892
8893What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8894@code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8895way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8896being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8897make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8898be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8899clear the flag.
8900
8901@c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8902
8903@node Debugging
8904@chapter Debugging Your Parser
8905
8906Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8907the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8908chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8909
8910The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8911They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8912automaton. There are several formats available:
8913@itemize @minus
8914@item
8915as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8916
8917@item
8918as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8919
8920@item
8921or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8922@ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8923@end itemize
8924
8925The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8926and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8927Parser}).
8928
8929@menu
8930* Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8931* Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8932* Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8933* Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8934@end menu
8935
8936@node Understanding
8937@section Understanding Your Parser
8938
8939As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8940Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8941frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8942tune or simply fix a parser.
8943
8944The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8945@option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8946Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8947the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8948instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8949parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8950a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8951
8952The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8953
8954@example
8955%token NUM STR
8956@group
8957%left '+' '-'
8958%left '*'
8959@end group
8960%%
8961@group
8962exp:
8963 exp '+' exp
8964| exp '-' exp
8965| exp '*' exp
8966| exp '/' exp
8967| NUM
8968;
8969@end group
8970useless: STR;
8971%%
8972@end example
8973
8974@command{bison} reports:
8975
8976@example
8977calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8978calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8979calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8980calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8981calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8982@end example
8983
8984When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8985creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8986order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8987interpretation is the same.
8988
8989@noindent
8990@cindex token, useless
8991@cindex useless token
8992@cindex nonterminal, useless
8993@cindex useless nonterminal
8994@cindex rule, useless
8995@cindex useless rule
8996The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8997nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8998useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8999the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
9000
9001@example
9002Nonterminals useless in grammar
9003 useless
9004
9005Terminals unused in grammar
9006 STR
9007
9008Rules useless in grammar
9009 6 useless: STR
9010@end example
9011
9012@noindent
9013The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
9014
9015@example
9016State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9017State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9018State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9019State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
9020@end example
9021
9022@noindent
9023Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
9024
9025@example
9026Grammar
9027
9028 0 $accept: exp $end
9029
9030 1 exp: exp '+' exp
9031 2 | exp '-' exp
9032 3 | exp '*' exp
9033 4 | exp '/' exp
9034 5 | NUM
9035@end example
9036
9037@noindent
9038and reports the uses of the symbols:
9039
9040@example
9041@group
9042Terminals, with rules where they appear
9043
9044$end (0) 0
9045'*' (42) 3
9046'+' (43) 1
9047'-' (45) 2
9048'/' (47) 4
9049error (256)
9050NUM (258) 5
9051STR (259)
9052@end group
9053
9054@group
9055Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
9056
9057$accept (9)
9058 on left: 0
9059exp (10)
9060 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
9061@end group
9062@end example
9063
9064@noindent
9065@cindex item
9066@cindex pointed rule
9067@cindex rule, pointed
9068Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
9069with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
9070item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
9071the location of the input cursor.
9072
9073@example
9074State 0
9075
9076 0 $accept: . exp $end
9077
9078 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9079
9080 exp go to state 2
9081@end example
9082
9083This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
9084beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
9085symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
9086after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
9087flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
9088symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
9089the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
9090lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
9091
9092@cindex core, item set
9093@cindex item set core
9094@cindex kernel, item set
9095@cindex item set core
9096Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
9097report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
9098at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
9099reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
9100you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
9101@option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
9102
9103@example
9104State 0
9105
9106 0 $accept: . exp $end
9107 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
9108 2 | . exp '-' exp
9109 3 | . exp '*' exp
9110 4 | . exp '/' exp
9111 5 | . NUM
9112
9113 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9114
9115 exp go to state 2
9116@end example
9117
9118@noindent
9119In the state 1@dots{}
9120
9121@example
9122State 1
9123
9124 5 exp: NUM .
9125
9126 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
9127@end example
9128
9129@noindent
9130the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
9131(@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
9132State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
9133jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
9134
9135@example
9136State 2
9137
9138 0 $accept: exp . $end
9139 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9140 2 | exp . '-' exp
9141 3 | exp . '*' exp
9142 4 | exp . '/' exp
9143
9144 $end shift, and go to state 3
9145 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9146 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9147 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9148 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9149@end example
9150
9151@noindent
9152In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
9153because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
9154@samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
9155jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
9156Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
9157error.
9158
9159@cindex accepting state
9160The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
9161state}:
9162
9163@example
9164State 3
9165
9166 0 $accept: exp $end .
9167
9168 $default accept
9169@end example
9170
9171@noindent
9172the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
9173read), the parsing exits successfully.
9174
9175The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
9176the reader.
9177
9178@example
9179State 4
9180
9181 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
9182
9183 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9184
9185 exp go to state 8
9186
9187
9188State 5
9189
9190 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
9191
9192 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9193
9194 exp go to state 9
9195
9196
9197State 6
9198
9199 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
9200
9201 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9202
9203 exp go to state 10
9204
9205
9206State 7
9207
9208 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
9209
9210 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9211
9212 exp go to state 11
9213@end example
9214
9215As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
92161 shift/reduce}:
9217
9218@example
9219State 8
9220
9221 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9222 1 | exp '+' exp .
9223 2 | exp . '-' exp
9224 3 | exp . '*' exp
9225 4 | exp . '/' exp
9226
9227 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9228 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9229
9230 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9231 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9232@end example
9233
9234Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
9235either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
9236conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
9237information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
9238ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
9239sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
9240NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
9241NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
9242
9243Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
9244arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
9245Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
9246square brackets.
9247
9248Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
9249shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
9250reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
9251@emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
9252possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
9253one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
9254is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
9255the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
9256lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
9257precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
9258with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
9259@option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
9260
9261@example
9262State 8
9263
9264 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9265 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
9266 2 | exp . '-' exp
9267 3 | exp . '*' exp
9268 4 | exp . '/' exp
9269
9270 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9271 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9272
9273 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9274 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9275@end example
9276
9277Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
9278the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
9279solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
9280@option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
9281conflicts in the report:
9282
9283@example
9284Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
9285Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
9286Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
9287@end example
9288
9289
9290The remaining states are similar:
9291
9292@example
9293@group
9294State 9
9295
9296 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9297 2 | exp . '-' exp
9298 2 | exp '-' exp .
9299 3 | exp . '*' exp
9300 4 | exp . '/' exp
9301
9302 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9303 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9304
9305 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
9306 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
9307@end group
9308
9309@group
9310State 10
9311
9312 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9313 2 | exp . '-' exp
9314 3 | exp . '*' exp
9315 3 | exp '*' exp .
9316 4 | exp . '/' exp
9317
9318 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9319
9320 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
9321 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
9322@end group
9323
9324@group
9325State 11
9326
9327 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9328 2 | exp . '-' exp
9329 3 | exp . '*' exp
9330 4 | exp . '/' exp
9331 4 | exp '/' exp .
9332
9333 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9334 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9335 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9336 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9337
9338 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9339 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9340 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9341 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9342 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
9343@end group
9344@end example
9345
9346@noindent
9347Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
9348precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
9349also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
9350
9351Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
9352XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
9353
9354@c ================================================= Graphical Representation
9355
9356@node Graphviz
9357@section Visualizing Your Parser
9358@cindex dot
9359
9360As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
9361automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
9362that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
9363most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
9364a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
9365fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
9366to help them understand LR parsers.
9367
9368This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
9369(@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
9370@samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
9371adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
9372Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
9373produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
9374parser in multiple formats}).
9375
9376
9377The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
9378
9379@example
9380%%
9381@group
9382exp: a ";" | b ".";
9383a: "0";
9384b: "0";
9385@end group
9386@end example
9387
9388The graphical output
9389@ifnotinfo
9390(see @ref{fig:graph})
9391@end ifnotinfo
9392is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
9393making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
9394Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
9395
9396@ifnotinfo
9397@float Figure,fig:graph
9398@image{figs/example, 430pt}
9399@caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
9400@end float
9401@end ifnotinfo
9402
9403@subheading Graphical Representation of States
9404
9405The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
9406Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
9407about transitions, for examples
9408
9409When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
9410needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
9411comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
9412reductions, below.
9413
9414@sp 1
9415
9416The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
9417the target states.
9418
9419@subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
9420
9421Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
9422shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
9423
9424@example
9425@group
9426State 3
9427
9428 1 exp: a . ";"
9429
9430 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9431@end group
9432@end example
9433
9434A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9435
9436@center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9437
9438@subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9439
9440Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9441bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9442appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9443action for the given state, there is no such label.
9444
9445This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9446@example
9447State 1
9448
9449 3 a: "0" . [";"]
9450 4 b: "0" . ["."]
9451
9452 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9453 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9454@end example
9455
9456A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9457
9458@center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9459
9460When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9461a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9462reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9463are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9464reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9465
9466The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
9467state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
9468
9469@subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9470
9471The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9472the name of the rule being jumped to.
9473
9474@c ================================================= XML
9475
9476@node Xml
9477@section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9478@cindex xml
9479
9480Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9481(@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
9482with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9483(@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
9484option @option{--graph}. However,
9485another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9486@command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9487verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9488transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9489XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9490@command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9491
9492The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9493@option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9494If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9495from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9496For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9497file is @file{foo.xml}.
9498
9499Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9500files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9501
9502@table @file
9503@item xml2dot.xsl
9504Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9505@item xml2text.xsl
9506Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
9507@item xml2xhtml.xsl
9508Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
9509@end table
9510
9511Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
9512@example
9513$ bison -x gr.y
9514@group
9515$ bison --print-datadir
9516/usr/local/share/bison
9517@end group
9518$ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
9519@end example
9520
9521@c ================================================= Tracing
9522
9523@node Tracing
9524@section Tracing Your Parser
9525@findex yydebug
9526@cindex debugging
9527@cindex tracing the parser
9528
9529When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9530@code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9531
9532@menu
9533* Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9534* Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9535* The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9536@end menu
9537
9538@node Enabling Traces
9539@subsection Enabling Traces
9540There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9541
9542@table @asis
9543@item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9544@findex YYDEBUG
9545Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9546parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9547@samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9548YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9549Prologue}).
9550
9551If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9552Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9553api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9554tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9555enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9556
9557@item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9558@itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9559Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9560Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix @{c@}}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9561otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9562
9563@item the directive @samp{%debug}
9564@findex %debug
9565Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9566Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9567compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9568
9569@item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9570@findex %define parse.trace
9571Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9572Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9573(@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9574useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9575portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9576@end table
9577
9578We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9579always possible.
9580
9581@findex YYFPRINTF
9582The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9583@code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9584@var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9585arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9586define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9587and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9588
9589Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9590request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9591You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9592you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9593
9594Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9595line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9596messages tell you these things:
9597
9598@itemize @bullet
9599@item
9600Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9601
9602@item
9603Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9604state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9605
9606@item
9607Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9608of the state stack afterward.
9609@end itemize
9610
9611To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9612description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9613This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9614positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9615possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9616can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9617the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9618something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9619grammar are to blame.
9620
9621The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9622debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9623parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9624the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9625of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9626
9627@node Mfcalc Traces
9628@subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9629
9630The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9631but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9632how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9633Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9634use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9635Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9636
9637As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9638calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9639traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9640prologue:
9641
9642@comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9643@example
9644/* Generate the parser description file. */
9645%verbose
9646/* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9647%define parse.trace
9648
9649/* Formatting semantic values. */
9650%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9651%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9652%printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <double>;
9653@end example
9654
9655The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9656support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9657@code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9658will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9659creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9660ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9661
9662The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9663semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9664either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9665tag: since @code{<double>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp},
9666this printer will be used for them.
9667
9668Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9669are sent onto standard error.
9670
9671@example
9672$ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9673Starting parse
9674Entering state 0
9675Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9676-> $$ = nterm input ()
9677Stack now 0
9678Entering state 1
9679@end example
9680
9681@noindent
9682This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9683(which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9684to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9685a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9686
9687Then the parser calls the scanner.
9688@example
9689Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9690Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9691Entering state 6
9692@end example
9693
9694@noindent
9695That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9696@samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9697The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9698something about it.
9699
9700@example
9701Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9702Shifting token '(' ()
9703Entering state 14
9704Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9705Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9706Entering state 4
9707Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9708 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9709-> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9710Stack now 0 1 6 14
9711Entering state 24
9712@end example
9713
9714@noindent
9715The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9716@code{<double>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9717@code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9718
9719@example
9720Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9721Shifting token '-' ()
9722Entering state 17
9723Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9724Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9725Entering state 4
9726Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9727 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9728-> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9729Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9730Entering state 26
9731Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9732Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9733 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9734 $2 = token '-' ()
9735 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9736-> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9737Stack now 0 1 6 14
9738Entering state 24
9739@end example
9740
9741@noindent
9742The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9743discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9744
9745@example
9746Next token is token ')' ()
9747Shifting token ')' ()
9748Entering state 31
9749Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9750 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9751 $2 = token '(' ()
9752 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9753 $4 = token ')' ()
9754-> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9755Stack now 0 1
9756Entering state 11
9757@end example
9758
9759@noindent
9760Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9761display its result.
9762
9763@example
9764Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9765Shifting token '\n' ()
9766Entering state 22
9767Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9768 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9769 $2 = token '\n' ()
9770@result{} 0
9771-> $$ = nterm line ()
9772Stack now 0 1
9773Entering state 10
9774Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9775 $1 = nterm input ()
9776 $2 = nterm line ()
9777-> $$ = nterm input ()
9778Stack now 0
9779Entering state 1
9780@end example
9781
9782The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9783expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9784completion of the parsing.
9785
9786@example
9787Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9788Shifting token $end ()
9789Entering state 2
9790Stack now 0 1 2
9791Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9792Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9793@end example
9794
9795
9796@node The YYPRINT Macro
9797@subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9798
9799@findex YYPRINT
9800Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9801@code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9802the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9803
9804@deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9805@findex YYPRINT
9806If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9807will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9808the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9809
9810For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9811@end deffn
9812
9813Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9814calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9815
9816@example
9817%@{
9818 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9819 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9820 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9821%@}
9822
9823@dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9824
9825static void
9826print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9827@{
9828 if (type == VAR)
9829 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9830 else if (type == NUM)
9831 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9832@}
9833@end example
9834
9835@c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9836
9837@node Invocation
9838@chapter Invoking Bison
9839@cindex invoking Bison
9840@cindex Bison invocation
9841@cindex options for invoking Bison
9842
9843The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9844
9845@example
9846bison @var{infile}
9847@end example
9848
9849Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9850@samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9851the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9852Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9853the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9854also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9855grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9856output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9857(respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9858feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9859@samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9860
9861For example :
9862
9863@example
9864bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9865@end example
9866@noindent
9867will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9868
9869@example
9870bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9871@end example
9872@noindent
9873will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9874
9875For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9876distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9877invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9878
9879@menu
9880* Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9881 in alphabetical order by short options.
9882* Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9883* Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9884@end menu
9885
9886@node Bison Options
9887@section Bison Options
9888
9889Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9890option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9891@samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9892are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9893@samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9894@samp{=}.
9895
9896Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9897short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9898option.
9899
9900@c Please, keep this ordered as in 'bison --help'.
9901@noindent
9902Operations modes:
9903@table @option
9904@item -h
9905@itemx --help
9906Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9907
9908@item -V
9909@itemx --version
9910Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9911
9912@item --print-localedir
9913Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9914
9915@item --print-datadir
9916Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9917
9918@item -y
9919@itemx --yacc
9920Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9921diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9922ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9923so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9924the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9925Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9926@code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9927token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9928substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9929for compatibility with POSIX:
9930
9931@example
9932#! /bin/sh
9933bison -y "$@@"
9934@end example
9935
9936The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9937traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9938like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9939this option is specified.
9940
9941@item -W [@var{category}]
9942@itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9943Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9944of:
9945@table @code
9946@item midrule-values
9947Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9948of the parent rule.
9949For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9950
9951@example
9952exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9953@end example
9954
9955Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9956For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9957
9958@example
9959exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9960@end example
9961
9962These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9963be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9964@code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9965
9966@item yacc
9967Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9968
9969@item conflicts-sr
9970@itemx conflicts-rr
9971S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9972the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9973unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9974conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9975no effect on the conflict report.
9976
9977@item deprecated
9978Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9979Bison.
9980
9981@item empty-rule
9982Empty rules without @code{%empty}. @xref{Empty Rules}. Disabled by
9983default, but enabled by uses of @code{%empty}, unless
9984@option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
9985
9986@item precedence
9987Useless precedence and associativity directives. Disabled by default.
9988
9989Consider for instance the following grammar:
9990
9991@example
9992@group
9993%nonassoc "="
9994%left "+"
9995%left "*"
9996%precedence "("
9997@end group
9998%%
9999@group
10000stmt:
10001 exp
10002| "var" "=" exp
10003;
10004@end group
10005
10006@group
10007exp:
10008 exp "+" exp
10009| exp "*" "num"
10010| "(" exp ")"
10011| "num"
10012;
10013@end group
10014@end example
10015
10016Bison reports:
10017
10018@c cannot leave the location and the [-Wprecedence] for lack of
10019@c width in PDF.
10020@example
10021@group
10022warning: useless precedence and associativity for "="
10023 %nonassoc "="
10024 ^^^
10025@end group
10026@group
10027warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence
10028 %left "*"
10029 ^^^
10030@end group
10031@group
10032warning: useless precedence for "("
10033 %precedence "("
10034 ^^^
10035@end group
10036@end example
10037
10038One would get the exact same parser with the following directives instead:
10039
10040@example
10041@group
10042%left "+"
10043%precedence "*"
10044@end group
10045@end example
10046
10047@item other
10048All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
10049
10050This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
10051releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
10052categories.
10053
10054@item all
10055All the warnings except @code{yacc}.
10056
10057@item none
10058Turn off all the warnings.
10059
10060@item error
10061See @option{-Werror}, below.
10062@end table
10063
10064A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
10065instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
10066POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
10067
10068@item -Werror[=@var{category}]
10069@itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
10070Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
10071@var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
10072
10073@var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
10074it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
10075
10076Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
10077@var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
10078this option.
10079
10080Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
10081the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
10082S/R conflicts as errors.
10083
10084@example
10085$ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
10086$ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
10087@end example
10088
10089@item -f [@var{feature}]
10090@itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
10091Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
10092@table @code
10093@item caret
10094@itemx diagnostics-show-caret
10095Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
10096@option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
10097location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
10098the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
10099an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
10100
10101@example
10102%type <ival> exp
10103%%
10104exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10105@end example
10106
10107When invoked with @option{-fcaret} (or nothing), Bison will report:
10108
10109@example
10110@group
10111in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
10112 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10113 ^^^^
10114@end group
10115@group
10116in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10117 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10118 ^^^
10119@end group
10120@group
10121in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10122 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10123 ^^^
10124@end group
10125@group
10126in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10127 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10128 ^^^
10129@end group
10130@group
10131in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
10132 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10133 ^^
10134@end group
10135@end example
10136
10137Whereas, when invoked with @option{-fno-caret}, Bison will only report:
10138
10139@example
10140@group
10141in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: ‘$exp’
10142in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10143in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10144in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10145in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of ‘exp’ has no declared type
10146@end group
10147@end example
10148
10149This option is activated by default.
10150
10151@end table
10152@end table
10153
10154@noindent
10155Tuning the parser:
10156
10157@table @option
10158@item -t
10159@itemx --debug
10160In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
101611 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
10162compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10163
10164@item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10165@itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10166@itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10167@itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10168Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
10169(@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
10170definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
10171
10172@itemize
10173@item
10174Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
10175the last.
10176@item
10177If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
10178@code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
10179definition for @var{name}.
10180@item
10181If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
10182@code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
10183definitions for @var{name}.
10184@item
10185Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
10186definitions for @var{name}.
10187@end itemize
10188
10189You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
10190make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
10191any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
10192
10193@item -L @var{language}
10194@itemx --language=@var{language}
10195Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
10196@code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
10197Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
10198@var{language} is case-insensitive.
10199
10200@item --locations
10201Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10202
10203@item -p @var{prefix}
10204@itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
10205Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
10206Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
10207Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
10208
10209@item -l
10210@itemx --no-lines
10211Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
10212implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
10213implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
10214associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
10215causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
10216treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
10217
10218@item -S @var{file}
10219@itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
10220Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
10221(@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
10222
10223@c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
10224@c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
10225@c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
10226@c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
10227
10228If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
10229file in the Bison installation directory.
10230If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
10231current working directory.
10232This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
10233
10234@item -k
10235@itemx --token-table
10236Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10237@end table
10238
10239@noindent
10240Adjust the output:
10241
10242@table @option
10243@item --defines[=@var{file}]
10244Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10245file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
10246the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10247
10248@item -d
10249This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
10250@var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
10251with other short options.
10252
10253@item -b @var{file-prefix}
10254@itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
10255Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
10256for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10257
10258@item -r @var{things}
10259@itemx --report=@var{things}
10260Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
10261separated list of @var{things} among:
10262
10263@table @code
10264@item state
10265Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
10266parser's automaton.
10267
10268@item itemset
10269Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10270the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
10271
10272@item lookahead
10273Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10274each rule's lookahead set.
10275
10276@item solved
10277Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
10278precedence and associativity directives.
10279
10280@item all
10281Enable all the items.
10282
10283@item none
10284Do not generate the report.
10285@end table
10286
10287@item --report-file=@var{file}
10288Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
10289
10290@item -v
10291@itemx --verbose
10292Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10293file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
10294parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10295
10296@item -o @var{file}
10297@itemx --output=@var{file}
10298Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
10299
10300The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
10301described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
10302
10303@item -g [@var{file}]
10304@itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
10305Output a graphical representation of the parser's
10306automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
10307@uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
10308@code{@var{file}} is optional.
10309If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10310@file{foo.dot}.
10311
10312@item -x [@var{file}]
10313@itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
10314Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
10315@code{@var{file}} is optional.
10316If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10317@file{foo.xml}.
10318(The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
10319More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10320@end table
10321
10322@node Option Cross Key
10323@section Option Cross Key
10324
10325Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
10326the corresponding short option and directive.
10327
10328@multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
10329@headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
10330@include cross-options.texi
10331@end multitable
10332
10333@node Yacc Library
10334@section Yacc Library
10335
10336The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
10337@code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
10338implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
10339them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
10340@option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
10341library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
10342Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
10343
10344If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
10345declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
10346
10347@example
10348int yyerror (char const *);
10349@end example
10350
10351Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
10352If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
10353@code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
10354
10355@example
10356int yyparse (void);
10357@end example
10358
10359@c ================================================= C++ Bison
10360
10361@node Other Languages
10362@chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
10363
10364@menu
10365* C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
10366* Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
10367@end menu
10368
10369@node C++ Parsers
10370@section C++ Parsers
10371
10372@menu
10373* C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
10374* C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
10375* C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
10376* C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10377* C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
10378* A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
10379@end menu
10380
10381@node C++ Bison Interface
10382@subsection C++ Bison Interface
10383@c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
10384@c - Always pure
10385@c - initial action
10386
10387The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
10388@samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
10389@option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
10390@xref{Decl Summary}.
10391
10392When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
10393namespace.
10394@findex %define api.namespace
10395Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
10396see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
10397in the following files:
10398
10399@table @file
10400@item position.hh
10401@itemx location.hh
10402The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
10403location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
10404@code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
10405Location Values}.
10406
10407@item stack.hh
10408An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
10409
10410@item @var{file}.hh
10411@itemx @var{file}.cc
10412(Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
10413declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
10414and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
10415parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
10416
10417The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
10418@option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
10419@samp{%defines} directive.
10420@end table
10421
10422All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
10423for a complete and accurate documentation.
10424
10425@node C++ Semantic Values
10426@subsection C++ Semantic Values
10427@c - No objects in unions
10428@c - YYSTYPE
10429@c - Printer and destructor
10430
10431Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
10432alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
10433practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
10434approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
10435
10436@menu
10437* C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
10438* C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
10439@end menu
10440
10441@node C++ Unions
10442@subsubsection C++ Unions
10443
10444The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
10445Union Declaration}. In particular it produces a genuine
10446@code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
10447@itemize @minus
10448@item
10449The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
10450you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
10451@code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
10452@item
10453Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
10454instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
10455to such objects are allowed.
10456@end itemize
10457
10458Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
10459reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
10460only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
10461Symbols}.
10462
10463@node C++ Variants
10464@subsubsection C++ Variants
10465
10466Bison provides a @emph{variant} based implementation of semantic values for
10467C++. This alleviates all the limitations reported in the previous section,
10468and in particular, object types can be used without pointers.
10469
10470To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
10471@code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
10472@code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
10473@code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
10474
10475For instance, instead of
10476
10477@example
10478%union
10479@{
10480 int ival;
10481 std::string* sval;
10482@}
10483%token <ival> NUMBER;
10484%token <sval> STRING;
10485@end example
10486
10487@noindent
10488write
10489
10490@example
10491%token <int> NUMBER;
10492%token <std::string> STRING;
10493@end example
10494
10495@code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
10496actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
10497management).
10498
10499Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
10500@code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
10501typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
10502
10503Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
10504dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
10505@code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
10506possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
10507eventually, destroyed.
10508
10509@deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
10510Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
10511be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
10512@end deftypemethod
10513
10514@deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
10515Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
10516@end deftypemethod
10517
10518
10519@strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
10520appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
10521machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
10522which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
10523Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
10524type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
10525that would be duplicating the information.
10526
10527Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
10528they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
10529less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
10530(the current implementation of) variants:
10531@itemize
10532@item
10533Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
10534the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
10535meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
10536therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
10537type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
10538types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
10539
10540@item
10541There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
10542@end itemize
10543
10544As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
10545is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
10546
10547@node C++ Location Values
10548@subsection C++ Location Values
10549@c - %locations
10550@c - class Position
10551@c - class Location
10552@c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10553
10554When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10555location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10556
10557By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10558in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10559@code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10560@code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10561classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10562
10563@tindex uint
10564In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10565genuine code only the latter is used.
10566
10567@menu
10568* C++ position:: One point in the source file
10569* C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10570* User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10571@end menu
10572
10573@node C++ position
10574@subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10575
10576@deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10577Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10578not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10579handled elsewhere.
10580@end deftypeop
10581
10582@deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10583Reset the position to the given values.
10584@end deftypemethod
10585
10586@deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10587The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10588parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10589feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10590filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10591@end deftypeivar
10592
10593@deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10594The line, starting at 1.
10595@end deftypeivar
10596
10597@deftypemethod {position} {void} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10598If @var{height} is not null, advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the
10599column number. The resulting line number cannot be less than 1.
10600@end deftypemethod
10601
10602@deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10603The column, starting at 1.
10604@end deftypeivar
10605
10606@deftypemethod {position} {void} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10607Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number. The
10608resulting column number cannot be less than 1.
10609@end deftypemethod
10610
10611@deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10612@deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10613@deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10614@deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10615Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10616@end deftypemethod
10617
10618@deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10619@deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10620Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10621@end deftypemethod
10622
10623@deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10624Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10625@samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10626@samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10627@end deftypefun
10628
10629@node C++ location
10630@subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10631
10632@deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10633Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10634@end deftypeop
10635
10636@deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10637@deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10638Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10639@end deftypeop
10640
10641@deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10642Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10643@end deftypemethod
10644
10645@deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10646@deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10647The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10648@end deftypeivar
10649
10650@deftypemethod {location} {void} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10651@deftypemethodx {location} {void} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10652Forwarded to the @code{end} position.
10653@end deftypemethod
10654
10655@deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10656@deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10657@deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10658@deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator- (int @var{width})
10659@deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator-= (int @var{width})
10660Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10661@end deftypemethod
10662
10663@deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10664Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10665@end deftypemethod
10666
10667@deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10668@deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10669Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10670positions.
10671@end deftypemethod
10672
10673@deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10674Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10675@code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10676@end deftypefun
10677
10678@node User Defined Location Type
10679@subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10680@findex %define api.location.type
10681
10682Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10683@code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10684
10685@example
10686%define api.location.type @{@var{LocationType}@}
10687@end example
10688
10689The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10690@itemize
10691@item
10692it must be copyable;
10693
10694@item
10695in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10696parser basically runs
10697@example
10698@@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10699@@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10700@end example
10701@noindent
10702so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10703
10704@item
10705alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10706which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10707
10708@item
10709if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10710 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10711@end itemize
10712
10713@sp 1
10714
10715In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10716variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10717definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10718parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10719
10720@example
10721%defines
10722%locations
10723%define api.namespace @{master::@}
10724@end example
10725
10726@noindent
10727to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10728files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10729
10730@example
10731%define api.location.type @{master::location@}
10732%code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10733@end example
10734
10735@node C++ Parser Interface
10736@subsection C++ Parser Interface
10737@c - define parser_class_name
10738@c - Ctor
10739@c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10740@c debug_stream.
10741@c - Reporting errors
10742
10743The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10744declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10745class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10746@samp{%define parser_class_name @{@var{name}@}}. The interface of
10747this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10748@code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10749it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10750additional argument for its constructor.
10751
10752@defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10753@defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10754The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10755@end defcv
10756
10757@defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10758A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10759defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10760use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10761@samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10762(@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10763@end defcv
10764
10765@defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10766This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10767from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10768equivalent with first
10769invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10770error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10771But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10772(i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10773function invoked from the user action.
10774@end defcv
10775
10776@deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10777Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10778@samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10779@end deftypemethod
10780
10781@deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10782@deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10783Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10784@end deftypemethod
10785
10786@deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10787Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10788
10789@cindex exceptions
10790The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10791when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10792the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10793@end deftypemethod
10794
10795@deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10796@deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10797Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10798@code{std::cerr}.
10799@end deftypemethod
10800
10801@deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10802@deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10803Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10804or nonzero, full tracing.
10805@end deftypemethod
10806
10807@deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10808@deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10809The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10810the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10811described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10812signature is used.
10813@end deftypemethod
10814
10815
10816@node C++ Scanner Interface
10817@subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10818@c - prefix for yylex.
10819@c - Pure interface to yylex
10820@c - %lex-param
10821
10822The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10823parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10824@samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10825depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10826
10827@menu
10828* Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10829* Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10830@end menu
10831
10832@node Split Symbols
10833@subsubsection Split Symbols
10834
10835The interface is as follows.
10836
10837@deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10838@deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10839Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10840location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10841@samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10842@end deftypemethod
10843
10844Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10845but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10846
10847Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10848
10849@example
10850[0-9]+ @{
10851 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10852 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10853 @}
10854[a-z]+ @{
10855 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10856 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10857 @}
10858@end example
10859
10860Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10861initialized. So the code would look like:
10862
10863@example
10864[0-9]+ @{
10865 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10866 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10867 @}
10868[a-z]+ @{
10869 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10870 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10871 @}
10872@end example
10873
10874@noindent
10875or
10876
10877@example
10878[0-9]+ @{
10879 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10880 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10881 @}
10882[a-z]+ @{
10883 yylval.build(yytext);
10884 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10885 @}
10886@end example
10887
10888
10889@node Complete Symbols
10890@subsubsection Complete Symbols
10891
10892If you specified both @code{%define api.value.type variant} and
10893@code{%define api.token.constructor},
10894the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10895which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10896traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10897value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10898
10899@deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10900Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10901semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10902the @var{location}.
10903@end deftypemethod
10904
10905This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10906it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10907a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10908it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10909
10910So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10911
10912@deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10913@deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10914Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10915including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10916@var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10917also pass the @var{location}.
10918@end deftypemethod
10919
10920For instance, given the following declarations:
10921
10922@example
10923%define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
10924%token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10925%token <int> INTEGER;
10926%token COLON;
10927@end example
10928
10929@noindent
10930Bison generates the following functions:
10931
10932@example
10933symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10934 const location_type& l);
10935symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10936 const location_type& loc);
10937symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10938@end example
10939
10940@noindent
10941which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10942
10943@example
10944[0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10945[a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10946":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10947@end example
10948
10949Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10950use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10951
10952@node A Complete C++ Example
10953@subsection A Complete C++ Example
10954
10955This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10956complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10957ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10958focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10959classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10960We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10961demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10962actually easier to interface with.
10963
10964@menu
10965* Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10966* Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10967* Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10968* Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10969* Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10970@end menu
10971
10972@node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10973@subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10974
10975Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10976expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10977environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10978@code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10979of valid input follows.
10980
10981@example
10982three := 3
10983seven := one + two * three
10984seven * seven
10985@end example
10986
10987@node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10988@subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10989@c - An env
10990@c - A place to store error messages
10991@c - A place for the result
10992
10993To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10994technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10995containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10996launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10997the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10998transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10999@dfn{parsing driver} class.
11000
11001The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
11002follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
11003required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
11004class.
11005
11006@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11007@example
11008#ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11009# define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11010# include <string>
11011# include <map>
11012# include "calc++-parser.hh"
11013@end example
11014
11015
11016@noindent
11017Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
11018the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
11019@code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
11020factor both as follows.
11021
11022@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11023@example
11024// Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
11025# define YY_DECL \
11026 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
11027// ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
11028YY_DECL;
11029@end example
11030
11031@noindent
11032The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
11033members.
11034
11035@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11036@example
11037// Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
11038class calcxx_driver
11039@{
11040public:
11041 calcxx_driver ();
11042 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
11043
11044 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
11045
11046 int result;
11047@end example
11048
11049@noindent
11050To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
11051member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
11052
11053@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11054@example
11055 // Handling the scanner.
11056 void scan_begin ();
11057 void scan_end ();
11058 bool trace_scanning;
11059@end example
11060
11061@noindent
11062Similarly for the parser itself.
11063
11064@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11065@example
11066 // Run the parser on file F.
11067 // Return 0 on success.
11068 int parse (const std::string& f);
11069 // The name of the file being parsed.
11070 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
11071 std::string file;
11072 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
11073 bool trace_parsing;
11074@end example
11075
11076@noindent
11077To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
11078dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
11079compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
11080close the class declaration and CPP guard.
11081
11082@comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11083@example
11084 // Error handling.
11085 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
11086 void error (const std::string& m);
11087@};
11088#endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11089@end example
11090
11091The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
11092member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
11093are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
11094messages and set error state.
11095
11096@comment file: calc++-driver.cc
11097@example
11098#include "calc++-driver.hh"
11099#include "calc++-parser.hh"
11100
11101calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
11102 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
11103@{
11104 variables["one"] = 1;
11105 variables["two"] = 2;
11106@}
11107
11108calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
11109@{
11110@}
11111
11112int
11113calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
11114@{
11115 file = f;
11116 scan_begin ();
11117 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
11118 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
11119 int res = parser.parse ();
11120 scan_end ();
11121 return res;
11122@}
11123
11124void
11125calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
11126@{
11127 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
11128@}
11129
11130void
11131calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
11132@{
11133 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
11134@}
11135@end example
11136
11137@node Calc++ Parser
11138@subsubsection Calc++ Parser
11139
11140The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
11141deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
11142and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
11143changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
11144the grammar for.
11145
11146@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11147@example
11148%skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
11149%require "@value{VERSION}"
11150%defines
11151%define parser_class_name @{calcxx_parser@}
11152@end example
11153
11154@noindent
11155@findex %define api.token.constructor
11156@findex %define api.value.type variant
11157This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
11158require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
11159enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
11160definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
11161
11162@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11163@example
11164%define api.token.constructor
11165%define api.value.type variant
11166%define parse.assert
11167@end example
11168
11169@noindent
11170@findex %code requires
11171Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
11172Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
11173to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
11174mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
11175driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
11176particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
11177forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
11178
11179@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11180@example
11181%code requires
11182@{
11183# include <string>
11184class calcxx_driver;
11185@}
11186@end example
11187
11188@noindent
11189The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
11190This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
11191global variables.
11192
11193@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11194@example
11195// The parsing context.
11196%param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
11197@end example
11198
11199@noindent
11200Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
11201first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
11202relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
11203propagated.
11204
11205@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11206@example
11207%locations
11208%initial-action
11209@{
11210 // Initialize the initial location.
11211 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
11212@};
11213@end example
11214
11215@noindent
11216Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
11217messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
11218(@pxref{LAC}).
11219
11220@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11221@example
11222%define parse.trace
11223%define parse.error verbose
11224@end example
11225
11226@noindent
11227@findex %code
11228The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
11229@file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
11230
11231@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11232@example
11233%code
11234@{
11235# include "calc++-driver.hh"
11236@}
11237@end example
11238
11239
11240@noindent
11241The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
11242allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
11243``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
11244avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
11245tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
11246
11247@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11248@example
11249%define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
11250%token
11251 END 0 "end of file"
11252 ASSIGN ":="
11253 MINUS "-"
11254 PLUS "+"
11255 STAR "*"
11256 SLASH "/"
11257 LPAREN "("
11258 RPAREN ")"
11259;
11260@end example
11261
11262@noindent
11263Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
11264both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
11265tags.
11266
11267@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11268@example
11269%token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
11270%token <int> NUMBER "number"
11271%type <int> exp
11272@end example
11273
11274@noindent
11275No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
11276recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
11277regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
11278@code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
11279
11280@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11281@example
11282%printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
11283@end example
11284
11285@noindent
11286The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
11287Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
11288
11289@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11290@example
11291%%
11292%start unit;
11293unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
11294
11295assignments:
11296 %empty @{@}
11297| assignments assignment @{@};
11298
11299assignment:
11300 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
11301
11302%left "+" "-";
11303%left "*" "/";
11304exp:
11305 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
11306| exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
11307| exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
11308| exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
11309| "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
11310| "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
11311| "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
11312%%
11313@end example
11314
11315@noindent
11316Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
11317driver.
11318
11319@comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11320@example
11321void
11322yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
11323 const std::string& m)
11324@{
11325 driver.error (l, m);
11326@}
11327@end example
11328
11329@node Calc++ Scanner
11330@subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
11331
11332The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
11333parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
11334
11335@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11336@example
11337%@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
11338# include <cerrno>
11339# include <climits>
11340# include <cstdlib>
11341# include <string>
11342# include "calc++-driver.hh"
11343# include "calc++-parser.hh"
11344
11345// Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
11346// 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
11347// not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
11348// <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
11349# undef yywrap
11350# define yywrap() 1
11351
11352// The location of the current token.
11353static yy::location loc;
11354%@}
11355@end example
11356
11357@noindent
11358Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
11359@code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
11360actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
11361Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
11362
11363@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11364@example
11365%option noyywrap nounput batch debug noinput
11366@end example
11367
11368@noindent
11369Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
11370
11371@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11372@example
11373id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
11374int [0-9]+
11375blank [ \t]
11376@end example
11377
11378@noindent
11379The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
11380time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
11381position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
11382column. When matching ends of lines, the end
11383cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
11384is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
11385preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
11386
11387@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11388@example
11389@group
11390%@{
11391 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
11392 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
11393%@}
11394@end group
11395%%
11396@group
11397%@{
11398 // Code run each time yylex is called.
11399 loc.step ();
11400%@}
11401@end group
11402@{blank@}+ loc.step ();
11403[\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
11404@end example
11405
11406@noindent
11407The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
11408
11409@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11410@example
11411"-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
11412"+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
11413"*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
11414"/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
11415"(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
11416")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
11417":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
11418
11419@group
11420@{int@} @{
11421 errno = 0;
11422 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
11423 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
11424 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
11425 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
11426@}
11427@end group
11428@{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
11429. driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
11430<<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
11431%%
11432@end example
11433
11434@noindent
11435Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
11436on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
11437
11438@comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11439@example
11440@group
11441void
11442calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
11443@{
11444 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
11445 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
11446 yyin = stdin;
11447 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
11448 @{
11449 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
11450 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11451 @}
11452@}
11453@end group
11454
11455@group
11456void
11457calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
11458@{
11459 fclose (yyin);
11460@}
11461@end group
11462@end example
11463
11464@node Calc++ Top Level
11465@subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
11466
11467The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
11468
11469@comment file: calc++.cc
11470@example
11471#include <iostream>
11472#include "calc++-driver.hh"
11473
11474@group
11475int
11476main (int argc, char *argv[])
11477@{
11478 int res = 0;
11479 calcxx_driver driver;
11480 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
11481 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
11482 driver.trace_parsing = true;
11483 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
11484 driver.trace_scanning = true;
11485 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
11486 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
11487 else
11488 res = 1;
11489 return res;
11490@}
11491@end group
11492@end example
11493
11494@node Java Parsers
11495@section Java Parsers
11496
11497@menu
11498* Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
11499* Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
11500* Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
11501* Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
11502* Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
11503* Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
11504* Java Push Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the a push parser
11505* Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11506* Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
11507@end menu
11508
11509@node Java Bison Interface
11510@subsection Java Bison Interface
11511@c - %language "Java"
11512
11513(The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
11514More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11515
11516The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
11517directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
11518
11519@c FIXME: Documented bug.
11520When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
11521create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
11522containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
11523@file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
11524implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
11525directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
11526entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
11527@code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
11528The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
11529
11530You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
11531
11532Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
11533state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
11534Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
11535and @code{%define api.pure} directives do nothing when used in Java.
11536
11537Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
11538api.push-pull} have no effect.
11539
11540GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
11541@code{glr-parser} directive.
11542
11543No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
11544@code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
11545
11546@c FIXME: Possible code change.
11547Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
11548in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
11549directives and the
11550@option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
11551options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
11552unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11553explicitly
11554if needed. Also, in the future the
11555@code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11556access the token names and codes.
11557
11558Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11559hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11560Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11561otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11562
11563
11564@node Java Semantic Values
11565@subsection Java Semantic Values
11566@c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11567@c - YYSTYPE
11568@c - Printer and destructor
11569
11570There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11571semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11572@code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11573
11574@example
11575%type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11576%type <Integer> number
11577@end example
11578
11579By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11580which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11581To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11582superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define api.value.type}
11583directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11584
11585@example
11586%define api.value.type @{ASTNode@}
11587@end example
11588
11589@noindent
11590any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11591is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11592
11593@c FIXME: Documented bug.
11594Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11595Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11596that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11597Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11598implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11599
11600Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11601adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11602to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11603
11604Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11605can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11606(in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11607
11608
11609@node Java Location Values
11610@subsection Java Location Values
11611@c - %locations
11612@c - class Position
11613@c - class Location
11614
11615When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11616location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11617class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11618defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11619positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11620class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11621renamed using @code{%define api.location.type @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11622
11623The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11624By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11625with @code{%define api.position.type @{@var{class-name}@}}. This class must
11626be supplied by the user.
11627
11628
11629@deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11630@deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11631The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11632@end deftypeivar
11633
11634@deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11635Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11636@end deftypeop
11637
11638@deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11639Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11640@end deftypeop
11641
11642@deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11643Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11644properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11645@code{toString} methods appropriately.
11646@end deftypemethod
11647
11648
11649@node Java Parser Interface
11650@subsection Java Parser Interface
11651@c - define parser_class_name
11652@c - Ctor
11653@c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11654@c debug_stream.
11655@c - Reporting errors
11656
11657The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11658@code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11659or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11660@samp{%define parser_class_name @{@var{name}@}} to give a custom name to
11661the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11662
11663By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11664@samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11665according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11666file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11667use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11668@code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11669A single @samp{%define annotations @{@var{annotations}@}} directive can
11670be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11671
11672The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11673@samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11674interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11675extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11676
11677The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11678for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11679interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11680these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11681below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11682@code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11683
11684The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11685directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11686final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11687which initialize them automatically.
11688
11689@deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11690Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11691no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11692@code{%lex-param}s are used.
11693
11694Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11695body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11696@samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11697@end deftypeop
11698
11699@deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11700Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11701additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11702used.
11703
11704If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11705declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11706created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11707
11708Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11709body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11710@samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11711@end deftypeop
11712
11713@deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11714Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11715@code{false} otherwise.
11716@end deftypemethod
11717
11718@deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11719@deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11720Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11721available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11722verbose error messages.
11723@end deftypemethod
11724
11725@deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11726@deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11727@deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11728Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11729instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11730available only if location tracking is active.
11731@end deftypemethod
11732
11733@deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11734During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11735from a syntax error.
11736@xref{Error Recovery}.
11737@end deftypemethod
11738
11739@deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11740@deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11741Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11742@code{System.err}.
11743@end deftypemethod
11744
11745@deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11746@deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11747Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11748or nonzero, full tracing.
11749@end deftypemethod
11750
11751@deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11752@deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11753Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11754@end deftypecv
11755
11756
11757@node Java Scanner Interface
11758@subsection Java Scanner Interface
11759@c - %code lexer
11760@c - %lex-param
11761@c - Lexer interface
11762
11763There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11764with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11765defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11766@code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11767contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11768@code{EOF} token.
11769
11770In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11771@code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11772parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11773@code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11774constructor.
11775
11776In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11777which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11778The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11779implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11780case.
11781
11782In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11783
11784@deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11785This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11786parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11787changed using @code{%define api.location.type @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11788@end deftypemethod
11789
11790@deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11791Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11792value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11793interface.
11794
11795Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11796Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11797@end deftypemethod
11798
11799@deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11800@deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11801Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11802@code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11803methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11804
11805The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11806@{@var{class-name}@}}.
11807@end deftypemethod
11808
11809@deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11810Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11811
11812The return type can be changed using @samp{%define api.value.type
11813@{@var{class-name}@}}.
11814@end deftypemethod
11815
11816@node Java Action Features
11817@subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11818
11819The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11820Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11821
11822Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11823actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11824
11825@defvar $@var{n}
11826The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11827This may not be assigned to.
11828@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11829@end defvar
11830
11831@defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11832Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11833@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11834@end defvar
11835
11836@defvar $$
11837The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11838value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11839@samp{%define api.value.type}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11840casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11841Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11842@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11843@end defvar
11844
11845@defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11846Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11847Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11848for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11849these constructs.
11850@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11851@end defvar
11852
11853@defvar @@@var{n}
11854The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11855This may not be assigned to.
11856@xref{Java Location Values}.
11857@end defvar
11858
11859@defvar @@$
11860The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11861@xref{Java Location Values}.
11862@end defvar
11863
11864@deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11865Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11866@xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11867@end deftypefn
11868
11869@deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11870Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11871@xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11872@end deftypefn
11873
11874@deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11875Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11876@xref{Error Recovery}.
11877@end deftypefn
11878
11879@deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11880Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11881reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11882operation.
11883@xref{Error Recovery}.
11884@end deftypefn
11885
11886@deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11887@deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11888@deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11889Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11890instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11891available only if location tracking is active.
11892@end deftypefn
11893
11894@node Java Push Parser Interface
11895@subsection Java Push Parser Interface
11896@c - define push_parse
11897@findex %define api.push-pull
11898
11899(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve. More
11900user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11901
11902Normally, Bison generates a pull parser for Java.
11903The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
11904parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
11905
11906@example
11907%define api.push-pull push
11908@end example
11909
11910Most of the discussion about the Java pull Parser Interface, (@pxref{Java
11911Parser Interface}) applies to the push parser interface as well.
11912
11913When generating a push parser, the method @code{push_parse} is created with
11914the following signature (depending on if locations are enabled).
11915
11916@deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} push_parse ({int} @var{token}, {Object} @var{yylval})
11917@deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} push_parse ({int} @var{token}, {Object} @var{yylval}, {Location} @var{yyloc})
11918@deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} push_parse ({int} @var{token}, {Object} @var{yylval}, {Position} @var{yypos})
11919@end deftypemethod
11920
11921The primary difference with respect to a pull parser is that the parser
11922method @code{push_parse} is invoked repeatedly to parse each token. This
11923function is available if either the "%define api.push-pull push" or "%define
11924api.push-pull both" declaration is used (@pxref{%define
11925Summary,,api.push-pull}). The @code{Location} and @code{Position}
11926parameters are available only if location tracking is active.
11927
11928The value returned by the @code{push_parse} method is one of the following
11929four constants: @code{YYABORT}, @code{YYACCEPT}, @code{YYERROR}, or
11930@code{YYPUSH_MORE}. This new value, @code{YYPUSH_MORE}, may be returned if
11931more input is required to finish parsing the grammar.
11932
11933If api.push-pull is declared as @code{both}, then the generated parser class
11934will also implement the @code{parse} method. This method's body is a loop
11935that repeatedly invokes the scanner and then passes the values obtained from
11936the scanner to the @code{push_parse} method.
11937
11938There is one additional complication. Technically, the push parser does not
11939need to know about the scanner (i.e. an object implementing the
11940@code{YYParser.Lexer} interface), but it does need access to the
11941@code{yyerror} method. Currently, the @code{yyerror} method is defined in
11942the @code{YYParser.Lexer} interface. Hence, an implementation of that
11943interface is still required in order to provide an implementation of
11944@code{yyerror}. The current approach (and subject to change) is to require
11945the @code{YYParser} constructor to be given an object implementing the
11946@code{YYParser.Lexer} interface. This object need only implement the
11947@code{yyerror} method; the other methods can be stubbed since they will
11948never be invoked. The simplest way to do this is to add a trivial scanner
11949implementation to your grammar file using whatever implementation of
11950@code{yyerror} is desired. The following code sample shows a simple way to
11951accomplish this.
11952
11953@example
11954%code lexer
11955@{
11956 public Object getLVal () @{return null;@}
11957 public int yylex () @{return 0;@}
11958 public void yyerror (String s) @{System.err.println(s);@}
11959@}
11960@end example
11961
11962@node Java Differences
11963@subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11964
11965The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11966between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11967section summarizes these differences.
11968
11969@itemize
11970@item
11971Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11972@code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11973macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11974appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11975opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11976only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11977@xref{Java Action Features}.
11978
11979Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11980@code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11981method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11982method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11983corresponds to these C macros.}.
11984
11985@item
11986Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11987values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11988@samp{%define api.value.type}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11989@code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11990an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11991type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11992Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11993left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11994@ref{Java Action Features}.
11995
11996@item
11997The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11998@table @asis
11999@item @code{%code imports}
12000blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
12001include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
12002suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
12003
12004@item unqualified @code{%code}
12005blocks are placed inside the parser class.
12006
12007@item @code{%code lexer}
12008blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
12009scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
12010that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
12011Interface}).
12012@end table
12013
12014Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
12015In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
12016and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
12017
12018The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
12019be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
12020the parser class.
12021@end itemize
12022
12023
12024@node Java Declarations Summary
12025@subsection Java Declarations Summary
12026
12027This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
12028meaning when used in a Java parser.
12029
12030@deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
12031Generate a Java class for the parser.
12032@end deffn
12033
12034@deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
12035A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
12036@emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
12037constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
12038@xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12039@end deffn
12040
12041@deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12042The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
12043@samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
12044@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12045@end deffn
12046
12047@deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
12048A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
12049and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
12050@xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12051@end deffn
12052
12053@deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
12054Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
12055@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12056@end deffn
12057
12058@deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
12059Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
12060a Java @emph{type}.
12061@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12062@end deffn
12063
12064@deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12065Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
12066@xref{Java Differences}.
12067@end deffn
12068
12069@deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12070Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
12071@xref{Java Differences}.
12072@end deffn
12073
12074@deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12075Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
12076@xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12077@end deffn
12078
12079@deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12080Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
12081@xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12082@end deffn
12083
12084@deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
12085Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
12086@emph{outside} the parser class.
12087@xref{Java Differences}.
12088@end deffn
12089
12090@deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
12091Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
12092@xref{Java Differences}.
12093@end deffn
12094
12095@deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
12096Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
12097@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12098@end deffn
12099
12100@deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} @{@var{annotations}@}
12101The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
12102@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12103@end deffn
12104
12105@deffn {Directive} {%define extends} @{@var{superclass}@}
12106The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
12107@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12108@end deffn
12109
12110@deffn {Directive} {%define final}
12111Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
12112@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12113@end deffn
12114
12115@deffn {Directive} {%define implements} @{@var{interfaces}@}
12116The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
12117Default is none.
12118@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12119@end deffn
12120
12121@deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12122The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
12123constructor. Default is none.
12124@xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12125@end deffn
12126
12127@deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12128The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
12129comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
12130@xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12131@end deffn
12132
12133@deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @{@var{class}@}
12134The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
12135positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
12136class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
12137Formerly named @code{location_type}.
12138@xref{Java Location Values}.
12139@end deffn
12140
12141@deffn {Directive} {%define package} @{@var{package}@}
12142The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
12143@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12144@end deffn
12145
12146@deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} @{@var{name}@}
12147The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
12148@code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
12149@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12150@end deffn
12151
12152@deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} @{@var{class}@}
12153The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
12154the user. Default is @code{Position}.
12155Formerly named @code{position_type}.
12156@xref{Java Location Values}.
12157@end deffn
12158
12159@deffn {Directive} {%define public}
12160Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
12161@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12162@end deffn
12163
12164@deffn {Directive} {%define api.value.type} @{@var{class}@}
12165The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
12166@xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12167@end deffn
12168
12169@deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
12170Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
12171@xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12172@end deffn
12173
12174@deffn {Directive} {%define throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12175The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
12176@code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
12177@xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12178@end deffn
12179
12180
12181@c ================================================= FAQ
12182
12183@node FAQ
12184@chapter Frequently Asked Questions
12185@cindex frequently asked questions
12186@cindex questions
12187
12188Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
12189are addressed.
12190
12191@menu
12192* Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
12193* How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
12194* Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
12195* Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
12196* Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
12197* Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
12198* I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
12199* Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
12200* Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
12201* More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
12202* Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
12203* Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
12204@end menu
12205
12206@node Memory Exhausted
12207@section Memory Exhausted
12208
12209@quotation
12210My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
12211message. What can I do?
12212@end quotation
12213
12214This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12215Rules}.
12216
12217@node How Can I Reset the Parser
12218@section How Can I Reset the Parser
12219
12220The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
12221following typical questions:
12222
12223@quotation
12224I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
12225properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
12226too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
12227@end quotation
12228
12229@noindent
12230or
12231
12232@quotation
12233My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
12234which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
12235although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
12236@end quotation
12237
12238These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
12239Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
12240speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
12241demonstration, consider the following source file,
12242@file{first-line.l}:
12243
12244@example
12245@group
12246%@{
12247#include <stdio.h>
12248#include <stdlib.h>
12249%@}
12250@end group
12251%%
12252.*\n ECHO; return 1;
12253%%
12254@group
12255int
12256yyparse (char const *file)
12257@{
12258 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
12259 if (!yyin)
12260 @{
12261 perror ("fopen");
12262 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12263 @}
12264@end group
12265@group
12266 /* One token only. */
12267 yylex ();
12268 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
12269 @{
12270 perror ("fclose");
12271 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12272 @}
12273 return 0;
12274@}
12275@end group
12276
12277@group
12278int
12279main (void)
12280@{
12281 yyparse ("input");
12282 yyparse ("input");
12283 return 0;
12284@}
12285@end group
12286@end example
12287
12288@noindent
12289If the file @file{input} contains
12290
12291@example
12292input:1: Hello,
12293input:2: World!
12294@end example
12295
12296@noindent
12297then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
12298
12299@example
12300$ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
12301$ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
12302$ @kbd{./first-line}
12303input:1: Hello,
12304input:2: World!
12305@end example
12306
12307Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
12308Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
12309new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
12310documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
12311@samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
12312Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
12313handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
12314functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
12315input buffers.
12316
12317If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
12318conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
12319also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
12320start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
12321
12322@node Strings are Destroyed
12323@section Strings are Destroyed
12324
12325@quotation
12326My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
12327them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
12328@samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
12329@end quotation
12330
12331This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
12332Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
12333of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
12334
12335@example
12336@group
12337%@{
12338#include <stdio.h>
12339char *yylval = NULL;
12340%@}
12341@end group
12342@group
12343%%
12344.* yylval = yytext; return 1;
12345\n /* IGNORE */
12346%%
12347@end group
12348@group
12349int
12350main ()
12351@{
12352 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
12353 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
12354 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
12355 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
12356 return 0;
12357@}
12358@end group
12359@end example
12360
12361If you compile and run this code, you get:
12362
12363@example
12364$ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12365$ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12366$ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12367"one
12368two", "two"
12369@end example
12370
12371@noindent
12372this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
12373in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
12374(e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
12375your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
12376given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
12377option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
12378
12379@example
12380$ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12381$ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12382$ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12383"two", "two"
12384@end example
12385
12386
12387@node Implementing Gotos/Loops
12388@section Implementing Gotos/Loops
12389
12390@quotation
12391My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
12392but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
12393@end quotation
12394
12395Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
12396the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
12397the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
12398the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
12399structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
12400i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
12401execute simple instructions one after the others.
12402
12403@cindex abstract syntax tree
12404@cindex AST
12405If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
12406to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
12407recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
12408or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
12409traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
12410execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
12411compiler.
12412
12413This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
12414invited to consult the dedicated literature.
12415
12416
12417@node Multiple start-symbols
12418@section Multiple start-symbols
12419
12420@quotation
12421I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
12422implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
12423multiple entry points.
12424@end quotation
12425
12426Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
12427simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
12428pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
12429@code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
12430real start-symbol:
12431
12432@example
12433%token START_FOO START_BAR;
12434%start start;
12435start:
12436 START_FOO foo
12437| START_BAR bar;
12438@end example
12439
12440These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
12441parser goes, that is all that is needed.
12442
12443Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
12444tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
12445straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
12446simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
12447after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
12448@code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
12449available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
12450@code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
12451
12452@example
12453 /* @r{Prologue.} */
12454%%
12455%@{
12456 if (start_token)
12457 @{
12458 int t = start_token;
12459 start_token = 0;
12460 return t;
12461 @}
12462%@}
12463 /* @r{The rules.} */
12464@end example
12465
12466
12467@node Secure? Conform?
12468@section Secure? Conform?
12469
12470@quotation
12471Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
12472@end quotation
12473
12474If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
12475However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
12476POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
12477please send us a bug report.
12478
12479@node I can't build Bison
12480@section I can't build Bison
12481
12482@quotation
12483I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
12484@code{msgfmt} is not found.
12485What should I do?
12486@end quotation
12487
12488Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
12489is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
12490subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
12491support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
12492@option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
12493gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
12494Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
12495
12496
12497@node Where can I find help?
12498@section Where can I find help?
12499
12500@quotation
12501I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
12502@end quotation
12503
12504First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
12505@email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
12506populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
12507and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
12508the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
12509so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
12510be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
12511help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
12512hearts.
12513
12514@node Bug Reports
12515@section Bug Reports
12516
12517@quotation
12518I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
12519@end quotation
12520
12521Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
12522version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
12523mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
12524the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
12525try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
12526
12527If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
12528you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
12529complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
12530to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
12531easier it will be to fix the bug.
12532
12533Include information about your compilation environment, including your
12534operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
12535version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
12536transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
12537`configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
12538send additional files as well (such as @file{config.h} or @file{config.cache}).
12539
12540Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
12541send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
12542
12543Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
12544
12545@node More Languages
12546@section More Languages
12547
12548@quotation
12549Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
12550favorite language here}?
12551@end quotation
12552
12553C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
12554languages; contributions are welcome.
12555
12556@node Beta Testing
12557@section Beta Testing
12558
12559@quotation
12560What is involved in being a beta tester?
12561@end quotation
12562
12563It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
12564release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
12565that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
12566everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
12567failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
12568but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
12569essentially halted.
12570
12571Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
12572developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
12573recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
12574systems are especially welcome.
12575
12576@node Mailing Lists
12577@section Mailing Lists
12578
12579@quotation
12580How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
12581@end quotation
12582
12583See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
12584
12585@c ================================================= Table of Symbols
12586
12587@node Table of Symbols
12588@appendix Bison Symbols
12589@cindex Bison symbols, table of
12590@cindex symbols in Bison, table of
12591
12592@deffn {Variable} @@$
12593In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
12594@xref{Tracking Locations}.
12595@end deffn
12596
12597@deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
12598@deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
12599In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
12600of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12601
12602In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12603with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12604@end deffn
12605
12606@deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
12607@deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
12608In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12609@xref{Tracking Locations}.
12610@end deffn
12611
12612@deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
12613In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12614with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12615@end deffn
12616
12617@deffn {Variable} $$
12618In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
12619@xref{Actions}.
12620@end deffn
12621
12622@deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
12623In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
12624right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12625@end deffn
12626
12627@deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12628@deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12629In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12630@xref{Actions}.
12631@end deffn
12632
12633@deffn {Delimiter} %%
12634Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12635Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12636@xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12637@end deffn
12638
12639@c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12640@deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12641All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12642to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12643the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12644Grammar}.
12645@end deffn
12646
12647@deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12648Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12649rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12650GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12651this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12652operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12653@xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12654
12655This feature is experimental.
12656More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12657feature.
12658@end deffn
12659
12660@deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
12661@deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
12662Comments, as in C/C++.
12663@end deffn
12664
12665@deffn {Delimiter} :
12666Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12667Grammar Rules}.
12668@end deffn
12669
12670@deffn {Delimiter} ;
12671Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12672@end deffn
12673
12674@deffn {Delimiter} |
12675Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12676@xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12677@end deffn
12678
12679@deffn {Directive} <*>
12680Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12681@code{%printer}.
12682
12683This feature is experimental.
12684More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12685feature.
12686
12687@xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12688@end deffn
12689
12690@deffn {Directive} <>
12691Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12692@code{%printer}.
12693
12694This feature is experimental.
12695More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12696feature.
12697
12698@xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12699@end deffn
12700
12701@deffn {Symbol} $accept
12702The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12703$end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12704Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12705@end deffn
12706
12707@deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12708@deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12709Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12710default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12711@xref{%code Summary}.
12712@end deffn
12713
12714@deffn {Directive} %debug
12715Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12716@end deffn
12717
12718@ifset defaultprec
12719@deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12720Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12721modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12722Precedence}.
12723@end deffn
12724@end ifset
12725
12726@deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12727@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12728@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
12729@deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12730Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12731@end deffn
12732
12733@deffn {Directive} %defines
12734Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12735meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12736@end deffn
12737
12738@deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12739Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12740@xref{Decl Summary}.
12741@end deffn
12742
12743@deffn {Directive} %destructor
12744Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12745discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12746@end deffn
12747
12748@deffn {Directive} %dprec
12749Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12750time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12751GLR Parsers}.
12752@end deffn
12753
12754@deffn {Directive} %empty
12755Bison declaration to declare make explicit that a rule has an empty
12756right-hand side. @xref{Empty Rules}.
12757@end deffn
12758
12759@deffn {Symbol} $end
12760The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12761used in the grammar.
12762@end deffn
12763
12764@deffn {Symbol} error
12765A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12766grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12767the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12768containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12769token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12770corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12771token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12772@xref{Error Recovery}.
12773@end deffn
12774
12775@deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12776An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12777(@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12778@end deffn
12779
12780@deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12781Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12782Summary}.
12783@end deffn
12784
12785@deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12786Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12787Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12788@end deffn
12789
12790@deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12791Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12792@end deffn
12793
12794@deffn {Directive} %language
12795Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12796@xref{Decl Summary}.
12797@end deffn
12798
12799@deffn {Directive} %left
12800Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12801@xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12802@end deffn
12803
12804@deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12805Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12806@code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12807for Pure Parsers}.
12808@end deffn
12809
12810@deffn {Directive} %merge
12811Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12812reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12813function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12814@xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12815@end deffn
12816
12817@deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12818Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12819Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12820
12821Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12822that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12823@code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12824
12825The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12826@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12827@code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12828push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12829@code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12830example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12831@code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12832@code{%define api.namespace} documentation in this section.
12833@end deffn
12834
12835
12836@ifset defaultprec
12837@deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12838Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12839modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12840Precedence}.
12841@end deffn
12842@end ifset
12843
12844@deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12845Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12846parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12847@end deffn
12848
12849@deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12850Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12851@xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12852@end deffn
12853
12854@deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12855Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12856@xref{Decl Summary}.
12857@end deffn
12858
12859@deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12860Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12861@code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12862Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12863@end deffn
12864
12865@deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12866Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12867should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12868@end deffn
12869
12870@deffn {Directive} %prec
12871Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12872@xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12873@end deffn
12874
12875@deffn {Directive} %precedence
12876Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12877@xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12878@end deffn
12879
12880@deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12881Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12882Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12883unreasonable usage.
12884@end deffn
12885
12886@deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12887Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12888Require a Version of Bison}.
12889@end deffn
12890
12891@deffn {Directive} %right
12892Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12893@xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12894@end deffn
12895
12896@deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12897Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12898@xref{Decl Summary}.
12899@end deffn
12900
12901@deffn {Directive} %start
12902Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12903Start-Symbol}.
12904@end deffn
12905
12906@deffn {Directive} %token
12907Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12908@xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12909@end deffn
12910
12911@deffn {Directive} %token-table
12912Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12913implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12914@end deffn
12915
12916@deffn {Directive} %type
12917Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12918,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12919@end deffn
12920
12921@deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12922The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12923@code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12924@code{error}.
12925@end deffn
12926
12927@deffn {Directive} %union
12928Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12929values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
12930@end deffn
12931
12932@deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12933Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12934making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12935function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12936Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12937
12938For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12939instead.
12940@end deffn
12941
12942@deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12943Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12944read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12945@xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12946
12947For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12948instead.
12949@end deffn
12950
12951@deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12952Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12953token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12954@end deffn
12955
12956@deffn {Variable} yychar
12957External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12958lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12959@code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12960@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12961@end deffn
12962
12963@deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12964Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12965lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12966@end deffn
12967
12968@deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12969Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12970,Tracing Your Parser}.
12971@end deffn
12972
12973@deffn {Variable} yydebug
12974External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12975is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12976symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12977@end deffn
12978
12979@deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12980Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12981after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12982@end deffn
12983
12984@deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12985Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12986recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12987does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12988want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12989the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12990
12991For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12992instead.
12993@end deffn
12994
12995@deffn {Function} yyerror
12996User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12997@xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12998@end deffn
12999
13000@deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
13001An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
13002with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
13003message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
13004definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
13005it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
13006(@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
13007@end deffn
13008
13009@deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
13010Macro used to output run-time traces.
13011@xref{Enabling Traces}.
13012@end deffn
13013
13014@deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
13015Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
13016@xref{Memory Management}.
13017@end deffn
13018
13019@deffn {Function} yylex
13020User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
13021the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
13022@code{yylex}}.
13023@end deffn
13024
13025@deffn {Variable} yylloc
13026External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
13027numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
13028variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
13029@code{yylex}.)
13030You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
13031grammar actions.
13032@xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
13033In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
13034@xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
13035@end deffn
13036
13037@deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
13038Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
13039members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
13040@end deffn
13041
13042@deffn {Variable} yylval
13043External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
13044value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
13045variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
13046@code{yylex}.)
13047@xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
13048In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
13049@xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
13050@end deffn
13051
13052@deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
13053Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
13054Management}.
13055@end deffn
13056
13057@deffn {Variable} yynerrs
13058Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
13059(In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
13060pure push parser, it is a member of @code{yypstate}.)
13061@xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
13062@end deffn
13063
13064@deffn {Function} yyparse
13065The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
13066parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
13067@end deffn
13068
13069@deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
13070Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
13071Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
13072@xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
13073@end deffn
13074
13075@deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
13076The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
13077call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
13078@xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
13079@code{yypstate_delete}}.
13080(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13081More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13082@end deffn
13083
13084@deffn {Function} yypstate_new
13085The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
13086call this function to create a new parser.
13087@xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
13088@code{yypstate_new}}.
13089(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13090More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13091@end deffn
13092
13093@deffn {Function} yypull_parse
13094The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
13095parse the rest of the input stream.
13096@xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
13097@code{yypull_parse}}.
13098(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13099More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13100@end deffn
13101
13102@deffn {Function} yypush_parse
13103The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
13104parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
13105@code{yypush_parse}}.
13106(The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13107More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13108@end deffn
13109
13110@deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
13111The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
13112is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
13113@xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
13114@end deffn
13115
13116@deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
13117Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
13118deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
13119the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
131201, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
13121reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
13122@code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
13123
13124In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
13125limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
13126set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
13127unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
13128@code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
13129generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
13130require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
13131@end deffn
13132
13133@deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
13134Deprecated in favor of the @code{%define} variable @code{api.value.type}.
13135Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
13136@xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
13137@end deffn
13138
13139@node Glossary
13140@appendix Glossary
13141@cindex glossary
13142
13143@table @asis
13144@item Accepting state
13145A state whose only action is the accept action.
13146The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
13147@xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
13148
13149@item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
13150Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
13151by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
13152committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
13153@xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13154
13155@item Consistent state
13156A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
13157
13158@item Context-free grammars
13159Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
13160Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
13161expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
13162permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
13163Grammars}.
13164
13165@item Default reduction
13166The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
13167contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
13168states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
13169the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
13170Reductions}.
13171
13172@item Defaulted state
13173A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
13174
13175@item Dynamic allocation
13176Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
13177compile time or on entry to a function.
13178
13179@item Empty string
13180Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
13181character string of length zero.
13182
13183@item Finite-state stack machine
13184A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
13185each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
13186machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
13187machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
13188parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
13189rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13190
13191@item Generalized LR (GLR)
13192A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
13193that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
13194deterministic parsing
13195algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
13196possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
13197right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
13198LR Parsing}.
13199
13200@item Grouping
13201A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
13202for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
13203@xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13204
13205@item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
13206A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
13207context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
13208language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
13209number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
13210often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
13211extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
13212grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
13213less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
13214grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
13215
13216@item Infix operator
13217An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
13218performs some operation.
13219
13220@item Input stream
13221A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
13222
13223@item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
13224A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
13225detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
13226use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
13227unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
13228syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
13229syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
13230
13231@item Language construct
13232One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
13233the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
13234@xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13235
13236@item Left associativity
13237Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
13238@samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
13239@samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
13240
13241@item Left recursion
13242A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
13243example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13244Rules}.
13245
13246@item Left-to-right parsing
13247Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
13248left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13249
13250@item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
13251A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
13252@xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
13253
13254@item Lexical tie-in
13255A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
13256tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
13257
13258@item Literal string token
13259A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
13260
13261@item Lookahead token
13262A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
13263Tokens}.
13264
13265@item LALR(1)
13266The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
13267generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
13268@xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
13269
13270@item LR(1)
13271The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
13272lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
13273
13274@item Nonterminal symbol
13275A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
13276be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
13277words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
13278
13279@item Parser
13280A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
13281the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
13282analyzer.
13283
13284@item Postfix operator
13285An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
13286performs some operation.
13287
13288@item Reduction
13289Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
13290nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
13291Parser Algorithm}.
13292
13293@item Reentrant
13294A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
13295number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
13296invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
13297
13298@item Reverse polish notation
13299A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
13300
13301@item Right recursion
13302A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
13303example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13304Rules}.
13305
13306@item Semantics
13307In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
13308taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
13309each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
13310
13311@item Shift
13312A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
13313further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
13314already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13315
13316@item Single-character literal
13317A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
13318@xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
13319
13320@item Start symbol
13321The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
13322the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
13323first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
13324@xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
13325
13326@item Symbol table
13327A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
13328during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
13329information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
13330
13331@item Syntax error
13332An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
13333syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
13334
13335@item Token
13336A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
13337that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
13338The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
13339the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
13340
13341@item Terminal symbol
13342A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
13343grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
13344@xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13345
13346@item Unreachable state
13347A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
13348the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
13349resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
13350@end table
13351
13352@node Copying This Manual
13353@appendix Copying This Manual
13354@include fdl.texi
13355
13356@node Bibliography
13357@unnumbered Bibliography
13358
13359@table @asis
13360@item [Denny 2008]
13361Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
13362for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
133632008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
13364pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
13365
13366@item [Denny 2010 May]
13367Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
13368Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
13369University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
13370@uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
13371
13372@item [Denny 2010 November]
13373Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
13374Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
13375in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
133762010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
13377
13378@item [DeRemer 1982]
13379Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
13380Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
13381Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
13382615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
13383
13384@item [Knuth 1965]
13385Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
13386@cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
13387607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
13388
13389@item [Scott 2000]
13390Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
13391@cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
13392London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
13393@uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
13394@end table
13395
13396@node Index of Terms
13397@unnumbered Index of Terms
13398
13399@printindex cp
13400
13401@bye
13402
13403@c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
13404@c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
13405@c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
13406@c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
13407@c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
13408@c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
13409@c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
13410@c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
13411@c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
13412@c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
13413@c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
13414@c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
13415@c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
13416@c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
13417@c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
13418@c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
13419@c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
13420@c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
13421@c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
13422@c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
13423@c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
13424@c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
13425@c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
13426@c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
13427@c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
13428@c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
13429@c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
13430@c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
13431@c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
13432@c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
13433@c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
13434@c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
13435@c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
13436@c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
13437@c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
13438@c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
13439@c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
13440@c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
13441@c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
13442@c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
13443@c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
13444@c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
13445@c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
13446@c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
13447@c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
13448@c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
13449@c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
13450@c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
13451@c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
13452@c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
13453@c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
13454@c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
13455@c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
13456@c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
13457@c LocalWords: parsers parser's
13458@c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
13459@c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
13460@c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
13461
13462@c Local Variables:
13463@c ispell-dictionary: "american"
13464@c fill-column: 76
13465@c End: