]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
416bd7a9 MA |
1 | -*- outline -*- |
2 | ||
3c146b5e AD |
3 | * Header guards |
4 | ||
32f0598d | 5 | From Franc,ois: should we keep the directory part in the CPP guard? |
3c146b5e AD |
6 | |
7 | ||
efea6231 AD |
8 | * URGENT: Documenting C++ output |
9 | Write a first documentation for C++ output. | |
10 | ||
bc933ef1 | 11 | |
88bce5a2 AD |
12 | * Documentation |
13 | Before releasing, make sure the documentation refers to the current | |
14 | `output' format. | |
15 | ||
16 | ||
2ab9a04f AD |
17 | * Error messages |
18 | Some are really funky. For instance | |
19 | ||
20 | type clash (`%s' `%s') on default action | |
21 | ||
22 | is really weird. Revisit them all. | |
23 | ||
2ab9a04f AD |
24 | |
25 | * read_pipe.c | |
26 | This is not portable to DOS for instance. Implement a more portable | |
27 | scheme. Sources of inspiration include GNU diff, and Free Recode. | |
28 | ||
bc933ef1 | 29 | |
3ae2b51f AD |
30 | * value_components_used |
31 | Was defined but not used: where was it coming from? It can't be to | |
32 | check if %union is used, since the user is free to $<foo>n on her | |
33 | union, doesn't she? | |
34 | ||
efea6231 | 35 | |
2ab9a04f | 36 | * Report |
ec3bc396 | 37 | |
2ab9a04f AD |
38 | ** GLR |
39 | How would Paul like to display the conflicted actions? In particular, | |
40 | what when two reductions are possible on a given lookahead, but one is | |
41 | part of $default. Should we make the two reductions explicit, or just | |
42 | keep $default? See the following point. | |
d7215705 | 43 | |
2ab9a04f AD |
44 | ** Disabled Reductions |
45 | See `tests/conflicts.at (Defaulted Conflicted Reduction)', and decide | |
46 | what we want to do. | |
d7215705 | 47 | |
2ab9a04f | 48 | ** Documentation |
bc933ef1 AD |
49 | Extend with error productions. The hard part will probably be finding |
50 | the right rule so that a single state does not exhibit too many yet | |
51 | undocumented ``features''. Maybe an empty action ought to be | |
52 | presented too. Shall we try to make a single grammar with all these | |
53 | features, or should we have several very small grammars? | |
ec3bc396 | 54 | |
2ab9a04f AD |
55 | ** --report=conflict-path |
56 | Provide better assistance for understanding the conflicts by providing | |
57 | a sample text exhibiting the (LALR) ambiguity. See the paper from | |
58 | DeRemer and Penello: they already provide the algorithm. | |
59 | ||
ec3bc396 | 60 | |
948be909 | 61 | * Extensions |
2ab9a04f AD |
62 | |
63 | ** yyerror, yysymprint interface | |
64 | It should be improved, in particular when using Bison features such as | |
65 | locations, and YYPARSE_PARAMS. For the time being, it is recommended | |
66 | to #define yyerror and yyprint to steal internal variables... | |
67 | ||
68 | ** Several %unions | |
6cbfbcc5 AD |
69 | I think this is a pleasant (but useless currently) feature, but in the |
70 | future, I want a means to %include other bits of grammars, and _then_ | |
71 | it will be important for the various bits to define their needs in | |
72 | %union. | |
76551463 | 73 | |
5c0a0514 AD |
74 | When implementing multiple-%union support, bare the following in mind: |
75 | ||
76 | - when --yacc, this must be flagged as an error. Don't make it fatal | |
77 | though. | |
78 | ||
79 | - The #line must now appear *inside* the definition of yystype. | |
80 | Something like | |
81 | ||
82 | { | |
83 | #line 12 "foo.y" | |
84 | int ival; | |
85 | #line 23 "foo.y" | |
86 | char *sval; | |
87 | } | |
88 | ||
fa770c86 AD |
89 | * Unit rules |
90 | Maybe we could expand unit rules, i.e., transform | |
91 | ||
92 | exp: arith | bool; | |
93 | arith: exp '+' exp; | |
94 | bool: exp '&' exp; | |
95 | ||
96 | into | |
97 | ||
98 | exp: exp '+' exp | exp '&' exp; | |
99 | ||
100 | when there are no actions. This can significantly speed up some | |
d7215705 AD |
101 | grammars. I can't find the papers. In particular the book `LR |
102 | parsing: Theory and Practice' is impossible to find, but according to | |
103 | `Parsing Techniques: a Practical Guide', it includes information about | |
104 | this issue. Does anybody have it? | |
fa770c86 | 105 | |
51dec47b | 106 | |
51dec47b | 107 | |
2ab9a04f | 108 | * Documentation |
51dec47b | 109 | |
2ab9a04f AD |
110 | ** History/Bibliography |
111 | Some history of Bison and some bibliography would be most welcome. | |
112 | Are there any Texinfo standards for bibliography? | |
113 | ||
114 | ||
115 | ||
948be909 PE |
116 | * Java, Fortran, etc. |
117 | ||
948be909 | 118 | |
f414d77d AD |
119 | ** Java |
120 | ||
121 | There are a couple of proposed outputs: | |
122 | ||
123 | - BYACC/J | |
124 | which is based on Byacc. | |
125 | <http://troi.lincom-asg.com/~rjamison/byacc/> | |
126 | ||
127 | - Bison Java | |
128 | which is based on Bison. | |
948be909 PE |
129 | <http://www.goice.co.jp/member/mo/hack-progs/bison-java.html> |
130 | ||
f414d77d AD |
131 |