1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2013 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
190 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
191 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
192 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
193 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
195 Outline of a Bison Grammar
197 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
198 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
199 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
200 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
201 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
205 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
206 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
207 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
210 Defining Language Semantics
212 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
213 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
214 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
215 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
216 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
217 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
218 action in the middle of a rule.
222 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
223 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
224 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
228 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
229 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
230 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
234 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
235 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
236 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
237 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
238 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
239 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
240 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
241 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
242 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
243 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
244 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
245 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
246 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
247 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
248 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
250 Parser C-Language Interface
252 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
253 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
254 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
255 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
256 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
257 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
259 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
260 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
261 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
264 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
266 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
267 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
268 of the token it has read.
269 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
270 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
272 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
273 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
275 The Bison Parser Algorithm
277 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
278 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
279 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
280 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
281 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
282 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
283 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
284 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
285 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
286 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
290 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
291 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
292 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
293 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
294 * How Precedence:: How they work.
295 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
299 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
300 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
301 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
302 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
304 Handling Context Dependencies
306 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
307 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
308 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
309 error recovery rules must be written.
311 Debugging Your Parser
313 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
314 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
315 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
316 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
320 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
321 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
322 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
326 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
327 in alphabetical order by short options.
328 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
329 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
331 Parsers Written In Other Languages
333 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
334 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
338 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
339 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
340 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
341 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
342 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
343 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
347 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
348 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
349 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
351 A Complete C++ Example
353 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
354 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
355 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
356 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
357 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
361 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
362 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
363 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
364 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
365 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
366 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
367 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
368 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
370 Frequently Asked Questions
372 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
373 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
374 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
375 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
376 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
377 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
378 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
379 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
380 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
381 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
382 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
383 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
387 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
393 @unnumbered Introduction
396 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
397 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
398 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
399 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
400 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
401 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
402 calculators to complex programming languages.
404 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
405 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
406 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
407 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
408 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
411 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
412 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
413 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
414 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
417 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
418 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
419 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
420 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
421 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
422 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
425 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
428 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
430 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
431 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
432 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
433 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
434 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
436 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
438 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
439 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
440 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
441 License to all of the Bison source code.
443 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
444 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
445 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
446 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
447 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
448 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
449 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
451 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
452 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
453 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
454 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
455 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
456 using the other GNU tools.
458 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
459 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
460 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
461 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
465 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
466 @include gpl-3.0.texi
469 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
471 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
472 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
473 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
476 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
477 as mathematical ideas.
478 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
479 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
480 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
481 the name of an identifier, etc.).
482 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
483 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
484 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
485 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
486 how is the output used?
487 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
488 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
491 @node Language and Grammar
492 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
494 @cindex context-free grammar
495 @cindex grammar, context-free
496 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
497 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
498 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
499 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
500 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
501 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
502 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
503 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
507 @cindex Backus-Naur form
508 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
509 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
510 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
511 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
512 essentially machine-readable BNF.
514 @cindex LALR grammars
515 @cindex IELR grammars
517 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
518 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
519 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
520 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
521 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
522 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
523 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
524 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
525 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
526 Construction}, to learn how.
529 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
530 @cindex ambiguous grammars
531 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
533 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
534 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
535 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
536 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
537 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
538 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
539 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
540 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
541 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
542 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
543 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
544 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
545 possible parses of any given string is finite.
547 @cindex symbols (abstract)
549 @cindex syntactic grouping
550 @cindex grouping, syntactic
551 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
552 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
553 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
554 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
555 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
556 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
557 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
559 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
560 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
561 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
562 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
563 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
564 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
565 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
566 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
567 lexicography, not grammar.)
569 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
572 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
573 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
574 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
575 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
576 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
577 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
578 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
581 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
582 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
583 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
584 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
585 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
586 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
587 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
588 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
590 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
591 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
592 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
593 reads informally as follows:
596 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
601 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
605 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
606 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
607 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
608 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
611 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
612 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
613 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
614 not the start symbol.
616 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
617 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
618 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
619 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
620 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
621 reports a syntax error.
623 @node Grammar in Bison
624 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
625 @cindex Bison grammar
626 @cindex grammar, Bison
627 @cindex formal grammar
629 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
630 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
631 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
633 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
634 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
635 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
637 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
638 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
639 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
640 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
641 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
642 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
643 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
646 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
647 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
648 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
649 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
651 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
652 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
654 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
655 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
656 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
657 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
661 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
665 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
667 @node Semantic Values
668 @section Semantic Values
669 @cindex semantic value
670 @cindex value, semantic
672 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
673 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
674 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
675 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
676 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
679 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
680 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
681 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
682 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
683 ,Defining Language Semantics},
686 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
687 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
688 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
689 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
692 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
693 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
694 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
695 need to have any semantic value.)
697 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
698 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
699 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
700 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
701 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
702 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
704 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
705 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
706 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
707 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
708 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
710 @node Semantic Actions
711 @section Semantic Actions
712 @cindex semantic actions
713 @cindex actions, semantic
715 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
716 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
717 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
718 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
721 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
722 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
723 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
724 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
725 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
726 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
727 newly recognized larger expression.
729 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
733 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
737 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
738 from the values of the two subexpressions.
741 @section Writing GLR Parsers
743 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
746 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
747 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
749 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
750 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
751 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
752 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
753 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
754 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
755 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
756 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
757 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
759 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
760 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
761 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
762 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
763 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
764 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
765 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
766 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
767 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
768 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
769 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
770 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
771 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
772 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
773 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
774 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
775 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
776 identical set of symbols.
778 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
779 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
780 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
781 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
782 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
783 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
784 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
785 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
786 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
790 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
791 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
792 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
793 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
794 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
797 @node Simple GLR Parsers
798 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
799 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
800 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
804 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
805 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
807 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
808 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
809 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
811 Consider a problem that
812 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
813 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
816 type subrange = lo .. hi;
817 type enum = (a, b, c);
821 The original language standard allows only numeric
822 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
823 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
824 10206) and many other
825 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
826 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
830 type subrange = (a) .. b;
834 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
835 type with only one value:
842 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
843 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
845 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
846 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
847 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
848 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
849 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
850 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
851 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
852 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
854 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
855 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
856 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
857 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
860 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
861 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
862 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
863 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
864 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
865 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
868 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
869 use the GLR algorithm.
870 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
871 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
872 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
873 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
874 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
875 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
876 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
877 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
878 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
880 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
881 reports a syntax error as usual.
883 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
884 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
885 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
886 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
887 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
889 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
890 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
891 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
892 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
893 The present example contains only one conflict between two
894 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
895 cannot be nested. So the number of
896 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
897 and the parsing time is still linear.
899 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
900 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
903 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
911 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
939 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
940 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
941 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
942 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
949 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
950 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
951 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
960 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
961 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
962 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
963 notice when the parser splits.
965 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
966 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
967 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
968 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
969 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
970 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
971 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
972 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
973 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
974 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
975 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
976 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
977 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
980 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
981 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
982 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
983 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
984 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
985 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
987 @node Merging GLR Parses
988 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
989 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
990 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
994 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
996 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
1001 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1003 void yyerror (char const *);
1017 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1026 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1027 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1028 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1029 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1030 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1034 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1035 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1036 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1037 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1041 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1042 | '(' declarator ')'
1047 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1048 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1055 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1056 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1057 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1058 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1059 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1060 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1061 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1062 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1063 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1064 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1065 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1066 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1067 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1068 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1070 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1071 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1072 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1073 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1074 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1075 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1076 The parser therefore prints
1079 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1082 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1083 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1090 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1091 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1092 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1093 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1094 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1095 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1096 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1097 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1098 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1099 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1105 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1106 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1107 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1108 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1113 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1114 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1119 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1123 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1131 with an accompanying forward declaration
1132 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1136 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1137 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1142 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1143 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1146 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1149 Bison requires that all of the
1150 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1151 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1152 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1153 the offending merge.
1155 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1156 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1158 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1159 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1161 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1162 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1163 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1164 the associated reduction.
1165 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1166 action in a GLR parser.
1169 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1171 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1173 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1174 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1175 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1176 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1177 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1178 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1179 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1180 influence syntax analysis.
1181 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1184 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1185 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1186 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1187 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1188 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1189 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1190 future versions of Bison.
1191 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1192 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1193 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1195 @subsubsection YYERROR
1197 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1198 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1199 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1200 initiate error recovery.
1201 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1202 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1203 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1204 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1205 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1206 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1207 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1208 the parse that invoked the test.
1210 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1211 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1212 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1215 @node Semantic Predicates
1216 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1218 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1220 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1222 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1223 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1224 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1225 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1229 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1230 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1235 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1236 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1237 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1238 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1239 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1240 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1241 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1243 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1244 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1245 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1246 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1249 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1250 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1251 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1255 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1256 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1257 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1258 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1263 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1264 false). However, this
1265 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1266 have overlapping syntax.
1267 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1268 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1269 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1270 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1273 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1274 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1276 @node Compiler Requirements
1277 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1278 @cindex @code{inline}
1279 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1281 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1282 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1283 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1284 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1285 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1286 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1295 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1299 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1300 && ! defined inline)
1309 @cindex textual location
1310 @cindex location, textual
1312 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1313 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1314 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1315 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1317 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1318 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1319 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1320 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1323 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1324 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1325 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1328 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1329 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1330 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1331 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1332 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1333 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1334 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1337 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1338 @cindex Bison parser
1339 @cindex Bison utility
1340 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1343 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1344 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1345 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1346 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1347 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1348 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1349 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1352 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1353 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1354 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1357 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1358 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1359 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1360 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1361 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1362 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1363 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1365 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1366 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1367 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1368 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1369 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1370 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1371 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1372 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1373 C-Language Interface}.
1375 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1376 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1377 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1378 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1379 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1380 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1381 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1382 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1383 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1384 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1385 anything other than their usual meanings.
1387 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1388 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1389 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1390 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1391 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1392 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1393 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1394 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1395 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1398 @section Stages in Using Bison
1399 @cindex stages in using Bison
1402 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1403 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1407 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1408 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1409 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1410 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1411 sequence of C statements.
1414 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1415 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1416 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1417 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1420 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1423 Write error-reporting routines.
1426 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1427 must follow these steps:
1431 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1434 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1437 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1440 @node Grammar Layout
1441 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1442 @cindex grammar file
1444 @cindex format of grammar file
1445 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1447 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1448 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1455 @var{Bison declarations}
1464 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1465 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1467 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1468 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1469 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1470 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1471 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1472 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1474 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1475 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1476 semantic values of various symbols.
1478 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1481 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1482 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1483 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1487 @cindex simple examples
1488 @cindex examples, simple
1490 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1491 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1492 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1493 and a multi-function calculator. All
1494 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1496 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1497 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1498 source file to try them.
1501 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1502 a first example with no operator precedence.
1503 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1504 Operator precedence is introduced.
1505 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1506 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1507 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1508 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1509 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1513 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1514 @cindex reverse polish notation
1515 @cindex polish notation calculator
1516 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1517 @cindex calculator, simple
1519 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1520 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1521 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1522 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1524 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1525 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1528 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1529 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1530 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1531 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1532 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1533 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1534 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1537 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1538 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1540 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1541 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1543 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1545 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1549 #define YYSTYPE double
1553 void yyerror (char const *);
1559 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1562 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1563 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1565 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1566 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1567 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1568 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1569 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1570 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1571 which is a floating point number.
1573 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1574 function @code{pow}.
1576 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1577 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1578 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1579 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1582 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1583 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1584 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1585 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1586 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1587 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1588 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1589 type for numeric constants.
1592 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1594 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1596 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1608 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1615 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1616 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1617 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1618 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1619 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1620 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1626 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1627 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1628 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1629 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1630 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1633 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1634 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1635 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1637 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1638 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1639 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1640 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1641 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1642 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1645 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1646 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1647 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1651 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1653 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1662 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1663 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1664 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1665 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1666 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1668 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1669 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1670 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1671 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1672 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1673 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1675 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1676 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1677 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1678 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1681 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1682 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1683 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1686 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1688 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1693 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1697 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1698 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1699 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1700 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1701 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1702 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1703 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1705 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1706 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1707 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1708 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1709 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1712 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1714 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1715 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1716 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1717 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1722 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1723 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1728 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1729 equally well have written them separately:
1733 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1734 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1738 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1739 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1740 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1741 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1742 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1743 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1744 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1745 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1747 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1748 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1749 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1751 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1752 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1756 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1760 means the same thing as this:
1765 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1771 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1774 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1775 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1776 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1778 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1779 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1780 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1781 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1783 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1785 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1786 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1787 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1788 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1790 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1791 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1792 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1793 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1794 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1795 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1796 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1797 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1798 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1800 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1801 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1802 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1803 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1804 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1806 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1807 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1809 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1811 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1814 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1815 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1816 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1817 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1828 /* Skip white space. */
1829 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1833 /* Process numbers. */
1834 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1837 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1842 /* Return end-of-input. */
1845 /* Return a single char. */
1852 @subsection The Controlling Function
1853 @cindex controlling function
1854 @cindex main function in simple example
1856 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1857 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1858 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1860 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1872 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1873 @cindex error reporting routine
1875 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1876 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1877 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1878 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1879 here is the definition we will use:
1881 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1886 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1888 yyerror (char const *s)
1890 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1895 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1896 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1897 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1898 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1899 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1900 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1902 @node Rpcalc Generate
1903 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1904 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1906 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1907 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1908 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1909 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1910 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1911 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1913 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1914 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1916 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1917 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1924 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1925 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1926 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1927 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1928 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1929 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1930 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1932 @node Rpcalc Compile
1933 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1934 @cindex compiling the parser
1936 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1940 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1942 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1946 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1947 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1948 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1952 # @r{List files again.}
1954 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1958 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1959 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1965 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1967 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1970 @result{} -3.166666667
1971 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1973 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1978 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1979 @cindex infix notation calculator
1981 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1983 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1984 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1985 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1986 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1989 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1993 #define YYSTYPE double
1997 void yyerror (char const *);
2002 /* Bison declarations. */
2006 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2007 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2010 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2021 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2028 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2029 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2030 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2031 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2032 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2033 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2034 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2041 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2044 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2046 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2047 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2048 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2049 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2050 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2051 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2052 the associativity/precedence.)
2054 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2055 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2056 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2057 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2058 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2059 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2062 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2063 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2064 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2065 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2066 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2068 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2073 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2081 @node Simple Error Recovery
2082 @section Simple Error Recovery
2083 @cindex error recovery, simple
2085 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2086 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2087 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2088 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2089 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2090 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2092 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2093 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2094 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2100 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2101 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2106 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2107 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2108 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2109 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2110 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2111 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2112 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2113 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2116 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2117 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2118 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2119 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2120 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2121 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2124 @node Location Tracking Calc
2125 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2126 @cindex location tracking calculator
2127 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2128 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2130 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2131 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2132 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2133 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2137 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2138 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2139 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2142 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2143 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2145 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2146 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2149 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2155 void yyerror (char const *);
2158 /* Bison declarations. */
2166 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2170 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2171 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2172 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2173 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2174 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2175 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2176 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2180 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2182 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2183 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2184 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2185 from the new information.
2187 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2188 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2201 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2208 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2209 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2210 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2220 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2221 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2222 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2227 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2228 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2229 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2233 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2234 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2235 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2237 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2238 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2239 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2240 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2241 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2242 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2246 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2248 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2249 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2250 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2253 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2254 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2265 /* Skip white space. */
2266 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2267 ++yylloc.last_column;
2272 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2273 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2277 /* Process numbers. */
2281 ++yylloc.last_column;
2282 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2284 ++yylloc.last_column;
2285 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2292 /* Return end-of-input. */
2297 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2301 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2304 ++yylloc.last_column;
2310 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2311 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2312 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2313 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2315 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2316 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2317 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2318 controlling function:
2325 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2326 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2332 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2333 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2334 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2336 @node Multi-function Calc
2337 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2338 @cindex multi-function calculator
2339 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2340 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2342 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2343 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2344 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2345 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2346 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2348 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2349 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2350 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2351 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2352 functions whose syntax has this form:
2355 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2359 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2360 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2361 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2366 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2367 @result{} 3.1415926536
2371 @result{} 0.0000000000
2373 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2374 @result{} 2.3000000000
2376 @result{} 2.3000000000
2378 @result{} 0.8329091229
2379 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2380 @result{} 2.3000000000
2384 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2387 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2388 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2389 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2390 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2391 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2394 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2395 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2397 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2399 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2403 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2404 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2405 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2407 void yyerror (char const *);
2413 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2414 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2417 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2418 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2425 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2426 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2430 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2431 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2432 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2434 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2435 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2436 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2437 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2439 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2440 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2441 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2442 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2443 between angle brackets).
2445 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2446 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2447 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2448 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2449 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2450 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2453 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2455 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2456 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2457 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2459 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2461 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2472 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2473 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2480 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2481 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2482 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2483 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2484 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2485 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2486 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2487 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2488 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2489 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2492 /* End of grammar. */
2496 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2497 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2498 @cindex symbol table example
2500 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2501 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2502 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2503 requires some additional C functions for support.
2505 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2506 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2507 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2509 @comment file: calc.h
2512 /* Function type. */
2513 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2517 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2520 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2521 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2524 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2525 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2527 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2532 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2534 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2535 extern symrec *sym_table;
2537 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2538 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2542 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2545 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2551 double (*fnct) (double);
2556 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2569 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2574 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2580 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2582 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2583 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2589 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2590 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2592 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2593 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2594 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2595 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2596 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2597 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2599 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2601 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2602 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2606 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2608 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2609 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2610 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2611 ptr->type = sym_type;
2612 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2613 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2621 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2624 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2625 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2626 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2634 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2636 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2637 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2638 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2639 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2641 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2642 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2643 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2644 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2645 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2646 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2648 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2649 operators in @code{yylex}.
2651 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2661 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2662 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2670 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2671 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2674 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2680 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2683 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2684 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2685 static size_t length = 40;
2686 static char *symbuf = 0;
2691 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2697 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2701 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2703 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2705 /* Get another character. */
2710 while (isalnum (c));
2717 s = getsym (symbuf);
2719 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2724 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2731 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2733 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2734 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2735 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2737 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2740 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2742 yyerror (char const *s)
2744 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2750 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2753 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2754 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2755 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2763 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2764 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2765 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2773 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2776 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2777 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2778 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2781 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2782 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2786 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2788 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2789 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2791 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2792 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2795 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2796 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2797 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2798 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2799 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2800 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2801 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2802 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2805 @node Grammar Outline
2806 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2809 @findex /* @dots{} */
2811 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2812 appropriate delimiters:
2819 @var{Bison declarations}
2828 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2829 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2833 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2834 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2835 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2836 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2837 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2841 @subsection The prologue
2842 @cindex declarations section
2844 @cindex declarations
2846 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2847 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2848 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2849 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2850 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2851 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2852 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2854 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2855 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2858 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2859 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2860 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2861 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2862 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2863 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2864 @code{%union} declaration.
2878 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2884 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2885 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2892 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2893 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2894 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2895 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2896 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2897 @code{#include} directives.
2899 @node Prologue Alternatives
2900 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2901 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2904 @findex %code requires
2905 @findex %code provides
2908 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2909 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2910 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2911 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2912 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2913 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2914 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2916 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2930 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2936 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2937 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2945 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2946 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2947 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2948 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2949 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2950 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2951 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2952 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2953 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2954 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2955 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2957 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2958 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2959 This behavior raises a few questions.
2960 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2961 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2962 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2963 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2964 This behavior is not intuitive.
2966 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2967 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2968 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2969 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2976 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2977 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2980 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2981 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2994 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3000 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3001 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3002 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3010 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
3011 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
3012 explicit which kind you intend.
3013 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
3015 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
3016 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
3017 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
3018 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
3019 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
3020 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
3021 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
3022 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
3023 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
3026 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3027 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3029 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3047 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3053 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3054 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3067 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3068 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3069 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3077 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3078 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3079 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3080 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3081 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3082 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3084 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3085 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3086 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3087 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3088 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3089 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3090 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3091 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3092 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3093 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3094 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3097 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3098 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3099 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3100 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3101 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3102 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3103 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3104 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3105 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3106 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3124 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3130 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3131 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3144 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3150 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3151 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3159 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3160 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3161 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3164 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3165 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3166 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3167 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3168 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3169 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3172 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3173 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3174 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3175 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3177 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3178 organize your grammar file.
3179 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3184 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3185 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3186 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3187 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3191 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3192 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3193 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3194 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3199 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3200 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3202 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3204 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3205 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3206 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3207 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3209 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3210 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3211 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3212 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3213 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3214 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3215 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3216 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3219 @node Bison Declarations
3220 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3221 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3222 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3224 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3225 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3226 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3227 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3230 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3231 @cindex grammar rules section
3232 @cindex rules section for grammar
3234 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3235 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3237 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3238 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3239 if it is the first thing in the file.
3242 @subsection The epilogue
3243 @cindex additional C code section
3245 @cindex C code, section for additional
3247 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3248 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3249 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3250 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3251 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3252 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3253 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3254 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3255 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3256 C-Language Interface}.
3258 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3259 from the grammar rules.
3261 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3262 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3263 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3264 of the grammar file.
3267 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3268 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3269 @cindex terminal symbol
3273 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3276 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3277 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3278 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3279 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3280 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3281 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3282 the symbol to stand for it.
3284 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3285 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3286 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3288 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3289 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3290 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3291 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3292 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3293 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3294 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3296 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3300 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3301 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3302 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3303 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3306 @cindex character token
3307 @cindex literal token
3308 @cindex single-character literal
3309 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3310 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3311 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3312 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3313 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3314 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3315 ,Operator Precedence}).
3317 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3318 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3319 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3320 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3321 your program will confuse other readers.
3323 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3324 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3325 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3326 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3327 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3328 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3332 @cindex string token
3333 @cindex literal string token
3334 @cindex multicharacter literal
3335 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3336 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3337 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3338 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3339 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3341 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3342 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3343 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3344 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3345 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3347 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3349 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3350 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3351 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3352 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3353 read your program will be confused.
3355 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3356 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3357 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3358 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3359 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3360 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3363 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3364 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3365 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3367 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3368 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3369 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3370 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3371 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3372 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3373 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3374 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3375 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3376 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3377 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3378 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3380 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3381 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3382 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3383 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3384 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3386 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3387 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3388 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3389 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3390 characters in the following C-language string:
3393 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3396 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3397 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3398 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3399 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3400 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3401 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3402 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3403 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3404 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3405 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3408 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3409 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3410 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3411 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3412 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3415 @section Grammar Rules
3417 A Bison grammar is a list of rules.
3420 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
3421 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
3422 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
3426 @subsection Syntax of Grammar Rules
3428 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3429 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3431 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3434 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3438 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3439 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3440 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3449 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3450 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3452 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3453 extra white space as you wish.
3455 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3456 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3459 @{@var{C statements}@}
3464 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3465 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3466 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3467 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3468 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3469 compiler can check it.
3471 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3472 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3473 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3474 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3475 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3476 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3477 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3478 character constants.
3480 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3484 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3485 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3490 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3491 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3498 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3501 @subsection Empty Rules
3506 A rule is said to be @dfn{empty} if its right-hand side (@var{components})
3507 is empty. It means that @var{result} can match the empty string. For
3508 example, here is how to define an optional semicolon:
3511 semicolon.opt: | ";";
3515 It is easy not to see an empty rule, especially when @code{|} is used. The
3516 @code{%empty} directive allows to make explicit that a rule is empty on
3528 Flagging a non-empty rule with @code{%empty} is an error. If run with
3529 @option{-Wempty-rule}, @command{bison} will report empty rules without
3530 @code{%empty}. Using @code{%empty} enables this warning, unless
3531 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
3533 The @code{%empty} directive is a Bison extension, it does not work with
3534 Yacc. To remain compatible with POSIX Yacc, it is customary to write a
3535 comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule with no components:
3548 @subsection Recursive Rules
3549 @cindex recursive rule
3550 @cindex rule, recursive
3552 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3553 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3554 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3555 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3556 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3567 @cindex left recursion
3568 @cindex right recursion
3570 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3571 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3572 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3584 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3585 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3586 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3587 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3588 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3589 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3590 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3593 @cindex mutual recursion
3594 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3595 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3596 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3605 | primary '+' primary
3618 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3622 @section Defining Language Semantics
3623 @cindex defining language semantics
3624 @cindex language semantics, defining
3626 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3627 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3628 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3630 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3631 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3632 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3633 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3636 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3637 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3638 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3639 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3640 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3641 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3642 action in the middle of a rule.
3646 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3647 @cindex semantic value type
3648 @cindex value type, semantic
3649 @cindex data types of semantic values
3650 @cindex default data type
3652 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3653 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3654 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3655 Notation Calculator}).
3657 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3658 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3659 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3662 #define YYSTYPE double
3666 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3667 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3668 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3669 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3671 @node Multiple Types
3672 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3674 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3675 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3676 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3677 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3680 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3681 requires you to do two things:
3685 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3686 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3687 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3688 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3692 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3693 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3694 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3695 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3696 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3705 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3707 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3708 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3709 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3710 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3712 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3713 placed at any position in the rule;
3714 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3715 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3716 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3717 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3719 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3720 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3721 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3722 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3723 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3724 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3725 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3726 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3727 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3728 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3731 Here is a typical example:
3737 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3741 Or, in terms of named references:
3747 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3752 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3753 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3754 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3755 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3756 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3757 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3759 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3760 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3761 referred to as @code{$2}.
3763 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3764 references construct.
3766 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3767 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3768 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3769 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3770 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3773 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3776 @cindex default action
3777 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3778 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3779 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3780 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3781 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3782 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3784 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3785 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3786 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3787 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3788 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3793 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3794 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3800 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3805 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3806 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3807 definition of @code{foo}.
3810 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3811 any, from a semantic action.
3812 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3813 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3816 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3817 @cindex action data types
3818 @cindex data types in actions
3820 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3821 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3823 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3824 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3825 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3826 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3827 in the rule. In this example,
3833 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3838 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3839 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3840 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3841 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3843 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3844 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3845 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3857 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3858 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3860 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3861 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3862 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3863 @cindex mid-rule actions
3865 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3866 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3867 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3870 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
3871 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
3872 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
3875 @node Using Mid-Rule Actions
3876 @subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
3878 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3879 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3880 it is run before they are parsed.
3882 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3883 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3884 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3885 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3888 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3889 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3890 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3891 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3892 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3893 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3895 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3896 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3897 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3898 at the end of the rule.
3900 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3901 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3902 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3903 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3904 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3905 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3912 $<context>$ = push_context ();
3913 declare_variable ($3);
3918 pop_context ($<context>5);
3924 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3925 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3926 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3927 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3928 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3929 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3932 Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
3933 component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
3934 and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
3941 $<context>let = push_context ();
3942 declare_variable ($3);
3947 pop_context ($<context>let);
3952 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3953 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3954 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3955 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3956 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3959 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3960 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3961 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3962 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3963 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3965 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3966 Discarded Symbols}).
3967 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3968 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3970 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3971 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3976 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3994 $let = push_context ();
3995 declare_variable ($3);
4002 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
4003 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
4004 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
4006 @node Mid-Rule Action Translation
4007 @subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
4011 As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
4012 rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
4013 graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
4014 reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
4018 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
4025 $@@1: /* empty */ @{ a(); @};
4026 $@@2: /* empty */ @{ c(); @};
4027 $@@3: /* empty */ @{ d(); @};
4028 exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
4032 with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
4034 A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
4035 the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
4036 action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
4039 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4046 @@1: /* empty */ @{ a(); @};
4047 @@2: /* empty */ @{ $$ = c(); @};
4048 $@@3: /* empty */ @{ d(); @};
4049 exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
4052 There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
4053 action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
4054 final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
4055 final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
4056 @code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
4060 $ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
4062 mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
4063 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4067 mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
4068 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4074 @node Mid-Rule Conflicts
4075 @subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
4076 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
4077 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
4078 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
4079 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
4080 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
4086 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4087 | '@{' statements '@}'
4093 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
4098 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4099 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4102 | '@{' statements '@}'
4108 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
4109 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
4110 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
4111 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
4112 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
4113 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
4115 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
4116 actions into the two rules, like this:
4121 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4122 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4123 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4124 '@{' statements '@}'
4130 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
4131 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
4133 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
4134 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
4135 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
4140 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4141 declarations statements '@}'
4142 | '@{' statements '@}'
4148 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
4149 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
4151 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
4152 serves as a subroutine:
4157 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4163 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4164 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4170 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4171 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4174 @node Tracking Locations
4175 @section Tracking Locations
4177 @cindex textual location
4178 @cindex location, textual
4180 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4181 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4182 especially symbol locations.
4184 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4185 actions to take when rules are matched.
4188 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4189 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4190 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4194 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4195 @cindex data type of locations
4196 @cindex default location type
4198 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4199 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4201 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4202 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4203 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4204 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4208 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4217 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4218 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4219 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4220 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4221 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4223 @node Actions and Locations
4224 @subsection Actions and Locations
4225 @cindex location actions
4226 @cindex actions, location
4229 @vindex @@@var{name}
4230 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4232 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4233 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4235 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4236 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4237 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4238 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4239 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4242 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4243 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4244 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4245 references construct.
4247 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4255 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4256 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4257 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4258 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4265 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4266 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4267 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4273 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4274 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4275 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4278 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4279 example above simply rewrites this way:
4293 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4294 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4295 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4302 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4303 from a semantic action.
4304 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4305 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4307 @node Location Default Action
4308 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4309 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4310 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4312 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4313 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4314 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4315 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4316 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4317 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4318 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4319 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4322 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4323 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4325 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4326 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4327 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4328 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4329 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4330 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4331 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4332 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4333 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4334 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4336 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4340 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4344 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4345 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4346 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4347 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4351 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4352 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4353 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4354 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4361 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4362 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4363 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4365 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4369 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4370 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4373 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4374 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4375 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4376 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4379 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4380 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4381 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4382 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4385 @node Named References
4386 @section Named References
4387 @cindex named references
4389 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4390 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4391 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4392 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4393 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4394 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4396 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4397 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4398 used as named references. For example:
4402 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4403 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4408 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4412 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4413 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4418 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4424 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4427 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4430 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4435 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4436 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4437 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4440 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4441 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4446 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4447 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4448 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4451 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4452 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4458 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4459 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4462 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4463 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4467 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4468 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4469 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4470 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4471 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4472 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4473 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4475 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4479 @section Bison Declarations
4480 @cindex declarations, Bison
4481 @cindex Bison declarations
4483 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4484 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4487 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4488 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4489 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4490 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4492 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4493 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4494 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4495 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4498 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4499 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4500 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4501 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4502 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4503 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4504 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4505 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4506 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4507 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4508 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4509 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4510 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4511 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4512 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4516 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4517 @cindex version requirement
4518 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4521 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4522 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4526 %require "@var{version}"
4530 @subsection Token Type Names
4531 @cindex declaring token type names
4532 @cindex token type names, declaring
4533 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4536 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4542 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4543 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4544 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4546 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4547 @code{%precedence}, or
4548 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4549 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4552 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4553 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4554 following the token name:
4558 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4562 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4563 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4564 with each other or with normal characters.
4566 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4567 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4568 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4569 Than One Value Type}).
4575 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4579 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4583 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4584 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4585 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4592 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4593 equivalent literal string tokens:
4596 %token <operator> OR "||"
4597 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4602 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4603 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4604 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4605 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4606 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4607 the literal string instead of the token name.
4609 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4610 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4614 %token END 0 "end of file"
4617 @node Precedence Decl
4618 @subsection Operator Precedence
4619 @cindex precedence declarations
4620 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4621 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4623 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4624 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4625 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4626 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4627 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4628 operator precedence.
4630 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4631 @code{%token}: either
4634 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4641 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4644 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4645 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4646 all the @var{symbols}:
4650 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4651 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4652 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4653 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4654 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4655 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4656 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4657 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4658 considered a syntax error.
4660 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4661 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4662 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4665 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4666 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4667 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4668 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4669 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4672 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4673 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4674 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4675 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4680 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4681 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4685 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4686 @cindex declaring value types
4687 @cindex value types, declaring
4690 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4691 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4692 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4707 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4708 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4709 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4710 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4712 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4713 @code{union}. For example:
4725 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4726 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4729 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4730 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4731 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4733 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4734 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4736 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4737 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4738 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4739 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4747 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4752 and then your grammar can use the following
4753 instead of @code{%union}:
4766 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4767 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4768 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4772 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4773 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4774 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4777 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4781 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4782 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4783 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4784 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4785 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4788 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4789 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4790 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4791 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4793 @node Initial Action Decl
4794 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4795 @findex %initial-action
4797 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4798 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4801 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4802 @findex %initial-action
4803 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4804 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4805 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4806 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4809 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4812 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4815 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4820 @node Destructor Decl
4821 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4822 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4826 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4827 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4828 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4829 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4830 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4831 must discard the start symbol.
4833 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4834 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4835 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4836 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4838 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4839 symbol is automatically discarded.
4841 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4843 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4844 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4845 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4846 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4847 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4850 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4851 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4852 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4853 tag among @var{symbols}.
4854 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4855 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4856 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4858 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4859 (These default forms are experimental.
4860 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4862 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4863 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4864 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4865 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4867 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4868 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4869 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4870 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4871 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4878 %union @{ char *string; @}
4879 %token <string> STRING1
4880 %token <string> STRING2
4881 %type <string> string1
4882 %type <string> string2
4883 %union @{ char character; @}
4884 %token <character> CHR
4885 %type <character> chr
4888 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4889 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4890 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4891 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4895 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4896 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4897 to @code{free} by default.
4898 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4899 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4900 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4901 @code{free} only once.
4902 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4903 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4905 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4906 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4907 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4908 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4909 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4910 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4911 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4912 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4913 reference it in your grammar.
4914 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4915 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4921 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4922 @cindex mid-rule actions
4923 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4924 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4925 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4926 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4927 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4928 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4929 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4930 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4934 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4935 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4936 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4941 @cindex discarded symbols
4942 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4946 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4948 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4950 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4951 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4953 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4954 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4957 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4960 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4961 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4964 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4965 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4966 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4970 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4971 @cindex printing semantic values
4975 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4976 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4977 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4978 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4980 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4981 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4982 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4984 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4987 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4988 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4989 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4990 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4991 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4992 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4993 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4996 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4997 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4998 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4999 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
5007 %union @{ char *string; @}
5008 %token <string> STRING1
5009 %token <string> STRING2
5010 %type <string> string1
5011 %type <string> string2
5012 %union @{ char character; @}
5013 %token <character> CHR
5014 %type <character> chr
5017 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
5018 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
5019 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
5020 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
5024 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
5025 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
5026 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
5027 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
5028 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
5029 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
5030 that has no semantic type tag. See also
5034 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
5035 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
5036 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
5037 @cindex warnings, preventing
5038 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
5042 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
5043 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
5044 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
5045 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
5046 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
5047 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
5049 The declaration looks like this:
5055 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
5056 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
5057 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
5058 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
5060 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
5061 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
5062 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
5063 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
5064 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
5065 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
5066 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
5072 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
5076 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
5077 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
5078 print the number of conflicts.
5081 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
5082 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
5083 go back to the beginning.
5086 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
5087 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
5088 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
5091 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
5092 but will keep silent otherwise.
5095 @subsection The Start-Symbol
5096 @cindex declaring the start symbol
5097 @cindex start symbol, declaring
5098 @cindex default start symbol
5101 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
5102 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
5103 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
5110 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
5111 @cindex reentrant parser
5113 @findex %define api.pure
5115 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
5116 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
5117 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
5118 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
5119 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
5120 program must be called only within interlocks.
5122 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
5123 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
5124 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
5125 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
5126 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
5128 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
5129 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
5130 reentrant. It looks like this:
5133 %define api.pure full
5136 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
5137 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
5138 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
5139 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
5140 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
5141 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
5142 of @code{yypstate} in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5143 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
5144 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
5146 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
5147 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
5151 @subsection A Push Parser
5154 @findex %define api.push-pull
5156 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5157 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5159 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
5160 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
5161 each time a new token is made available.
5163 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5164 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5165 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5166 within a certain time period.
5168 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5169 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5170 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5173 %define api.push-pull push
5176 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5177 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5178 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5179 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5180 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5183 %define api.pure full
5184 %define api.push-pull push
5187 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5188 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5189 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5190 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5192 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5193 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5194 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5195 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5196 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5197 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5198 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5199 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5203 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5205 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5206 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5207 yypstate_delete (ps);
5210 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5211 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5212 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5213 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5214 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5215 example would thus look like this:
5220 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5223 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5224 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5225 yypstate_delete (ps);
5228 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5229 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5231 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5232 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5233 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5234 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5235 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5236 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5237 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5238 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5239 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5240 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5241 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5242 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5243 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5244 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5245 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5246 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5247 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5251 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5252 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5253 yypstate_delete (ps);
5256 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5257 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5258 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5261 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5262 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5263 @cindex declaration summary
5264 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5266 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5268 @deffn {Directive} %union
5269 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5270 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5273 @deffn {Directive} %token
5274 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5275 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5278 @deffn {Directive} %right
5279 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5280 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5283 @deffn {Directive} %left
5284 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5285 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5288 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5289 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5290 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5291 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5295 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5296 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5297 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5301 @deffn {Directive} %type
5302 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5303 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5306 @deffn {Directive} %start
5307 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5311 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5312 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5313 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5319 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5322 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5323 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5325 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5326 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5327 @xref{%code Summary}.
5330 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5331 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5333 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5336 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5337 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5338 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5339 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5342 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5343 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5344 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5345 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5346 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5348 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5349 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5350 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5351 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5352 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5353 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5354 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5355 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5356 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5357 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5359 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5360 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5361 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5363 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5364 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5365 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5367 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5368 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5369 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5370 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5371 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5373 @findex %code requires
5374 @findex %code provides
5375 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5376 header also contains their code.
5377 @xref{%code Summary}.
5379 @cindex Header guard
5380 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5381 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5382 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5383 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5384 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5387 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5388 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5390 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5391 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5393 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5397 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5398 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5401 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5402 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5403 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5406 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5407 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5408 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5411 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5412 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5413 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5414 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5418 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5419 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5420 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5421 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5422 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5423 accurate syntax error messages.
5426 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5427 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5428 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5430 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5431 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5432 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5433 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5434 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5435 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5436 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5437 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5439 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5443 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5444 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5445 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5450 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5451 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5452 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5453 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5454 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5455 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5456 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5460 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5461 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5464 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5465 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5466 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5470 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5471 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5472 Require a Version of Bison}.
5475 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5476 Specify the skeleton to use.
5478 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5479 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5480 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5481 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5483 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5484 file in the Bison installation directory.
5485 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5486 directory of the grammar file.
5487 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5490 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5491 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5492 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5493 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5494 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5495 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5496 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5499 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5500 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5501 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5502 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5503 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5504 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5505 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5508 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5509 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5510 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5514 The highest token number, plus one.
5516 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5518 The number of grammar rules,
5520 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5524 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5525 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5526 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5527 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5531 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5532 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5533 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5537 @node %define Summary
5538 @subsection %define Summary
5540 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5541 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5542 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5543 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5544 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5545 @code{%define} directive:
5547 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5548 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5549 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5550 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5552 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5553 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5554 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5555 to specifying @code{""}.
5557 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5558 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5559 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5562 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5563 @code{%define} accepts.
5565 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5566 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5570 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5572 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5573 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5575 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5577 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5578 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5581 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5582 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5583 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5584 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5585 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5586 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are described below.
5588 @deffn Directive {%define api.namespace} "@var{namespace}"
5590 @item Languages(s): C++
5592 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5593 For example, if you specify:
5596 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5599 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5602 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5605 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5606 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5609 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5615 @item Accepted Values:
5616 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5617 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5619 @item Default Value:
5620 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5621 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5622 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5623 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5624 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5625 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5626 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5629 %define api.namespace "foo"
5630 %name-prefix "bar::"
5633 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5639 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5640 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @var{type}
5643 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5645 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5646 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5648 @item Accepted Values: String
5650 @item Default Value: none
5653 Introduced in Bison 2.7 for C, C++ and Java. Introduced under the name
5654 @code{location_type} for C++ in Bison 2.5 and for Java in Bison 2.4.
5658 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5659 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.prefix} @var{prefix}
5662 @item Language(s): All
5664 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5665 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5667 @item Accepted Values: String
5669 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5671 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5675 @c ================================================== api.pure
5676 @deffn Directive {%define api.pure}
5679 @item Language(s): C
5681 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5682 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5684 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5686 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5687 the case for Boolean values.
5689 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5690 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5691 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5694 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5695 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5696 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5698 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5702 void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5703 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5706 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5707 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5710 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5713 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5714 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5716 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5719 the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5726 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5727 @deffn Directive {%define api.push-pull} @var{kind}
5730 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5732 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5733 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5734 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5735 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5737 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5739 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5746 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5747 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.constructor}
5754 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5755 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5756 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5758 @item Accepted Values:
5761 @item Default Value:
5764 introduced in Bison 2.8
5767 @c api.token.constructor
5770 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5771 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.prefix} @var{prefix}
5774 @item Languages(s): all
5777 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5778 target language. For instance
5781 %token FILE for ERROR
5782 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
5784 start: FILE for ERROR;
5788 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5789 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5790 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5791 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5792 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5793 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5794 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5796 @item Accepted Values:
5797 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5798 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5799 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5801 @item Default Value:
5804 introduced in Bison 2.8
5810 @c ================================================== api.value.type
5811 @deffn Directive {%define api.value.type} @var{type}
5817 Request variant-based semantic values.
5818 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5820 @item Default Value:
5823 introduced in Bison 2.8. Was introduced for Java only in 2.3b as
5830 @c ================================================== location_type
5831 @deffn Directive {%define location_type}
5832 Obsoleted by @code{api.location.type} since Bison 2.7.
5836 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
5838 @deffn Directive {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{when}
5841 @item Language(s): all
5843 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5844 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5845 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5846 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5848 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5849 @item Default Value:
5851 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5852 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5855 introduced as @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.5, renamed as
5856 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.8.
5860 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
5862 @deffn Directive {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state}
5865 @item Language(s): all
5866 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5867 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5868 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5869 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5871 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
5872 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states} in 2.5, and as
5873 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.8.
5876 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
5878 @c ================================================== lr.type
5880 @deffn Directive {%define lr.type} @var{type}
5883 @item Language(s): all
5885 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5886 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5887 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5889 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5891 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5895 @c ================================================== namespace
5896 @deffn Directive %define namespace @var{namespace}
5897 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5901 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5902 @deffn Directive {%define parse.assert}
5905 @item Languages(s): C++
5907 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5908 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5910 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5912 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5914 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5920 @c ================================================== parse.error
5921 @deffn Directive {%define parse.error}
5926 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5927 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5929 @item Accepted Values:
5932 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5934 @item @code{verbose}
5935 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5936 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5940 @item Default Value:
5947 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5948 @deffn Directive {%define parse.lac}
5951 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5953 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5954 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5955 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5956 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5961 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5962 @deffn Directive {%define parse.trace}
5965 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
5967 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5968 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5970 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
5971 @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
5972 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
5973 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5976 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5978 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5984 @subsection %code Summary
5988 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5989 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5990 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5991 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5992 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5993 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5994 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5995 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5997 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5998 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5999 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
6000 in the parser implementation.
6002 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
6003 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
6004 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
6006 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
6009 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
6010 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
6011 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
6012 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
6013 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
6014 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
6018 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
6019 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
6020 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
6023 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
6024 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
6028 @findex %code requires
6031 @item Language(s): C, C++
6033 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
6034 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
6035 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
6036 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
6037 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
6039 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
6040 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6045 @findex %code provides
6048 @item Language(s): C, C++
6050 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
6051 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
6053 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
6054 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
6062 @item Language(s): C, C++
6064 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
6065 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
6066 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
6067 parser implementation file. For example:
6076 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
6080 @findex %code imports
6083 @item Language(s): Java
6085 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
6087 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
6088 before any class definitions.
6092 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
6093 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
6094 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
6095 of the standard Bison skeletons.
6098 @node Multiple Parsers
6099 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
6101 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
6102 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
6103 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
6104 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
6105 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
6106 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
6107 exported in the generated header.
6109 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
6110 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
6111 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
6112 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
6113 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
6114 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
6115 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
6116 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
6117 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
6119 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
6120 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
6121 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
6122 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
6123 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
6124 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
6125 specifically --- more about this below.
6127 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
6128 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
6131 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
6132 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
6133 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
6134 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
6137 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
6138 #define yyparse cparse
6139 #define yylval clval
6145 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
6146 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
6147 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
6149 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
6153 extern CSTYPE clval;
6157 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
6158 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
6159 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
6164 # if defined YYDEBUG
6181 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
6182 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
6183 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
6186 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
6187 @cindex C-language interface
6190 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
6191 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
6192 functions that it needs to use.
6194 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
6195 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
6196 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
6197 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6200 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6201 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6202 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6203 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6204 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6205 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6207 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6208 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6209 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6213 @node Parser Function
6214 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6217 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6218 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6219 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6220 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6221 without reading further.
6224 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6225 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6226 is due to end-of-input).
6228 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6229 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6232 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6235 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6240 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6245 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6248 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6249 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6250 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6252 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6253 @findex %parse-param
6254 Declare that one or more
6255 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6256 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6257 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6258 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6261 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6264 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6268 Then call the parser like this:
6272 int nastiness, randomness;
6273 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6274 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6280 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6283 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6287 Using the following:
6289 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6292 Results in these signatures:
6294 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
6295 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6299 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
6300 and @code{%locations} are used:
6303 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
6304 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6307 @node Push Parser Function
6308 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6309 @findex yypush_parse
6311 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6312 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6314 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6315 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6316 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6317 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6319 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6320 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6321 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6322 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6325 @node Pull Parser Function
6326 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6327 @findex yypull_parse
6329 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6330 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6332 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6333 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6334 declaration is used.
6335 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6337 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6338 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6341 @node Parser Create Function
6342 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6343 @findex yypstate_new
6345 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6346 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6348 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6349 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6350 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6351 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6353 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6354 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6355 or 0 if no memory was available.
6356 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6360 @node Parser Delete Function
6361 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6362 @findex yypstate_delete
6364 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6365 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6367 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6368 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6369 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6370 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6372 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6373 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6374 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6378 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6380 @cindex lexical analyzer
6382 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6383 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6384 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6385 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6387 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6388 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6389 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6390 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6391 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6392 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6393 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6397 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6398 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6399 of the token it has read.
6400 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6401 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6403 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6404 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6407 @node Calling Convention
6408 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6410 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6411 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6412 signifies end-of-input.
6414 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6415 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6416 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6417 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6419 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6420 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6421 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6422 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6423 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6424 signifies end-of-input.
6426 Here is an example showing these things:
6433 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6436 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6437 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6439 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6445 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6446 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6448 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6449 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6453 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6454 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6455 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6456 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6459 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6460 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6461 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6462 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6463 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6466 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6467 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6468 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6469 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6472 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6475 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6476 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6477 strlen (token_buffer))
6478 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6479 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6484 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6485 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6489 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6492 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6493 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6494 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6495 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6501 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6502 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6507 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6508 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6509 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6510 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6511 declaration looks like this:
6524 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6529 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6530 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6535 @node Token Locations
6536 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6539 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6540 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6541 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6542 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6543 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6544 data in that variable.
6546 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6547 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6548 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6549 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6550 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6553 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6556 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6558 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6559 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6560 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6561 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6562 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6563 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6568 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6571 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6572 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6577 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6578 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6579 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6582 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6583 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6584 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6585 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6587 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6589 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6590 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6591 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6594 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6596 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6597 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6598 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6599 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6600 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6607 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6608 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6609 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6613 results in the following signatures:
6616 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6617 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6620 If @samp{%define api.pure full} is added:
6623 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6624 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6628 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure full} and @code{%locations} are
6632 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6633 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6634 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6637 @node Error Reporting
6638 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6639 @cindex error reporting function
6642 @cindex syntax error
6644 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6645 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6646 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6647 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6650 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6651 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6652 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6653 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6654 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6656 @findex %define parse.error
6657 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6658 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6659 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6660 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6661 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6663 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6664 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6665 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6666 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6667 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6668 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6670 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6671 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6672 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6674 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6679 yyerror (char const *s)
6683 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6688 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6689 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6690 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6691 immediately return 1.
6693 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6694 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6695 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6696 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6697 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6699 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6700 following signature:
6703 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6707 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6708 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6709 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6710 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6711 message is always passed last.
6713 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6714 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6715 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6719 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6720 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6721 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6722 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6724 @node Action Features
6725 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6726 @cindex summary, action features
6727 @cindex action features summary
6729 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6730 are useful in actions.
6732 @deffn {Variable} $$
6733 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6734 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6737 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6738 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6739 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6742 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6743 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6744 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6745 Types of Values in Actions}.
6748 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6749 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6750 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6751 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6754 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6755 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6756 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6759 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6760 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6761 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6764 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6766 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6767 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6768 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6769 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6770 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6771 going to be reduced by this rule.
6773 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6774 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6775 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6778 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6781 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6782 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6785 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6786 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6790 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6791 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6792 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6793 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6794 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6795 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6798 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6799 @findex YYRECOVERING
6800 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6801 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6802 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6805 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6806 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6807 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6808 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6809 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6811 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6814 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6815 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6817 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6819 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6822 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6823 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6824 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6825 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6828 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6829 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6830 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6831 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6833 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6836 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6837 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6838 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6839 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6841 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6845 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6846 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6849 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6853 @c int first_line, last_line;
6854 @c int first_column, last_column;
6858 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6859 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6861 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6862 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6863 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6866 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6869 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6871 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6872 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6876 @node Internationalization
6877 @section Parser Internationalization
6878 @cindex internationalization
6884 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6885 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6886 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6887 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6888 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6889 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6890 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6891 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6894 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6895 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6896 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6901 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6902 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6903 by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
6904 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6905 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6909 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6914 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6915 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6916 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6917 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6918 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6919 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6920 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6921 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6922 Bison-generated parser.
6925 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6926 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6927 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6931 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6934 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6935 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6936 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6940 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6941 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6942 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6945 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6951 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6955 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6961 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6962 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6963 @cindex algorithm of parser
6966 @cindex parser stack
6967 @cindex stack, parser
6969 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6970 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6971 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6973 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6974 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6977 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6978 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6979 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6980 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6981 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6982 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6983 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6985 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6992 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6993 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6996 expr: expr '*' expr;
7000 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
7007 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
7008 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
7010 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
7011 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
7012 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
7014 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
7017 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
7018 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
7019 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
7020 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
7021 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
7022 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
7023 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
7024 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
7025 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
7026 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
7030 @section Lookahead Tokens
7031 @cindex lookahead token
7033 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
7034 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
7035 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
7036 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
7037 token in order to decide what to do.
7039 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
7040 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
7041 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
7042 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
7043 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
7044 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
7045 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
7048 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
7049 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
7050 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
7069 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
7070 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
7071 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
7072 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
7073 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
7075 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
7076 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
7077 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
7078 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
7079 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
7080 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
7085 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
7086 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
7087 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
7088 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7091 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
7093 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
7094 @cindex dangling @code{else}
7095 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
7097 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
7098 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
7103 "if" expr "then" stmt
7104 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7110 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
7111 specific keyword tokens.
7113 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
7114 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
7115 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
7116 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
7119 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
7120 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
7121 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
7122 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
7123 contrast it with the other alternative.
7125 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
7126 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
7130 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7132 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
7135 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
7136 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
7137 making these two inputs equivalent:
7140 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7142 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
7145 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
7146 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
7147 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
7148 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
7149 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
7150 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
7151 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
7152 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
7154 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
7155 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
7156 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
7157 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
7159 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
7160 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
7161 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
7162 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
7163 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
7166 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
7167 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
7168 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
7182 "if" expr "then" stmt
7183 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7193 @section Operator Precedence
7194 @cindex operator precedence
7195 @cindex precedence of operators
7197 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7198 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7199 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7200 shift and when to reduce.
7203 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7204 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7205 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7206 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7207 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7208 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7211 @node Why Precedence
7212 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7214 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7215 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7230 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7231 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7232 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7233 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7234 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7235 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7236 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7239 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7240 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7241 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7242 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7243 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7244 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7245 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7246 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7249 @cindex associativity
7250 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7251 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7252 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7253 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7254 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7255 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7256 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7257 makes right-associativity.
7259 @node Using Precedence
7260 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7266 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7267 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7268 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7269 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7270 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7271 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7272 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7274 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7275 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7276 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7277 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7278 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7279 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7280 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7281 what expected the grammar author.
7283 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7284 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7285 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7286 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7287 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7289 @node Precedence Only
7290 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7293 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7294 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7295 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7296 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7297 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7298 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7299 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7301 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7302 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7303 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7307 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7310 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7311 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7312 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7313 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7314 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7315 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7316 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7323 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7324 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7325 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7326 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7327 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7328 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7329 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7331 @node Precedence Examples
7332 @subsection Precedence Examples
7334 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7342 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7343 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7344 declared with @code{'-'}:
7347 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7352 @node How Precedence
7353 @subsection How Precedence Works
7355 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7356 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7357 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7358 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7359 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7360 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7362 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7363 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7364 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7365 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7366 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7367 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7368 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7371 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7372 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7375 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7377 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7378 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7379 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7380 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7382 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7383 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7384 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7385 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7386 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7387 instance as follows:
7396 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7397 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7398 use right associativity:
7401 %right "then" "else"
7404 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7405 ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7406 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7407 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7408 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7409 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7410 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7412 @node Contextual Precedence
7413 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7414 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7415 @cindex unary operator precedence
7416 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7417 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7420 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7421 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7422 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7423 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7425 The Bison precedence declarations
7426 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7427 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7428 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7431 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7432 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7433 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7434 modifier's syntax is:
7437 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7441 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7442 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7443 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7444 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7445 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7447 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7448 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7449 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7459 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7467 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7472 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7473 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7474 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7475 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7477 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7478 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7479 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7480 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7482 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7483 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7484 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7485 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7486 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7487 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7489 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7490 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7494 @section Parser States
7495 @cindex finite-state machine
7496 @cindex parser state
7497 @cindex state (of parser)
7499 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7500 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7501 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7502 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7503 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7505 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7506 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7507 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7508 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7509 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7510 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7511 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7512 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7515 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7516 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7517 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7520 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7521 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7522 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7524 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7525 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7528 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7529 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7534 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7536 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7542 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7543 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7549 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7550 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7551 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7552 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7553 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7554 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7556 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7557 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7558 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7560 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7561 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7562 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7563 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7564 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7566 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7567 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7568 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7569 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7574 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7575 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7580 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7587 | sequence redirects
7601 | redirects redirect
7607 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7608 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7609 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7610 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7611 in infinitely many ways!
7613 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7614 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7615 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7616 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7618 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7629 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7637 | sequence redirects
7651 | redirects redirect
7656 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7657 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7658 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7659 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7660 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7663 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7664 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7666 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7667 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7668 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7669 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7670 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7675 %precedence "sequence"
7680 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7681 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7693 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7694 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7697 %right "word" "redirect"
7702 | sequence word %prec "word"
7703 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7708 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7709 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7710 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7712 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7718 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7721 | name_list ':' type
7738 | name ',' name_list
7743 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7744 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7745 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7746 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7750 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7752 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7753 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7754 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7756 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7757 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7758 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7759 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7760 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7761 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7762 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7765 @cindex canonical LR
7766 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7767 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7768 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7769 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7770 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7771 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7772 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7773 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7775 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7776 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7777 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7778 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7779 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7787 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7792 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7793 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7794 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7795 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7796 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7797 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7799 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7800 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7801 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7802 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7803 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7804 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7810 | name_list ':' type
7822 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7823 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7828 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7829 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7830 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7831 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7832 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7833 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7834 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7836 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7837 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7838 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7839 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7841 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7842 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7845 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7846 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7847 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7848 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7851 @node LR Table Construction
7852 @subsection LR Table Construction
7853 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7856 @cindex canonical LR
7857 @findex %define lr.type
7859 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7860 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7861 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7862 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7865 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7866 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7867 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7868 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7871 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7872 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7873 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7876 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
7877 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7878 values for @var{type} are:
7881 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7883 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7886 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7890 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7894 %define lr.type ielr
7897 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7898 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7899 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7900 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7901 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7902 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7903 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7904 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7905 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7906 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7908 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7909 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7910 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7911 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7917 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7920 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7922 @cindex GLR with LALR
7923 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7924 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%precedence}),
7926 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7927 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7928 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7929 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7930 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7931 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7932 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7933 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7935 @item Malformed grammars.
7937 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7938 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7939 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7940 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7941 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7946 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7947 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7948 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7949 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7950 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7951 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7952 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7953 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7954 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7958 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7961 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7962 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7963 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7964 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7965 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7966 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7967 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7968 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7969 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7970 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7971 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7972 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7975 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7976 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7977 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7979 @node Default Reductions
7980 @subsection Default Reductions
7981 @cindex default reductions
7982 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
7985 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7986 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7987 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7988 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7989 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7991 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7992 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7995 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7997 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7998 @cindex consistent states
7999 @cindex defaulted states
8000 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
8001 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
8002 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
8003 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
8004 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
8005 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
8006 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
8007 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
8008 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
8009 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
8010 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
8012 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
8013 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
8014 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
8015 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
8016 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
8017 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
8018 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
8019 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
8020 should already be considered closed.
8022 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
8024 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8025 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
8026 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
8027 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
8028 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
8029 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
8030 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
8031 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
8032 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
8036 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
8037 @c sentence from being rejected.
8038 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
8039 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
8040 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
8041 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
8042 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
8043 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
8046 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
8047 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
8048 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
8049 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
8050 because the accept action ends the parse.
8052 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
8053 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
8054 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
8055 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
8056 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
8057 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
8058 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
8059 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
8060 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
8061 split the parse instead.
8063 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
8064 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
8066 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{where}
8067 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
8068 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
8070 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
8071 @item @code{consistent}
8072 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
8075 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
8076 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8081 @findex %define parse.lac
8083 @cindex lookahead correction
8085 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
8086 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
8087 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
8088 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
8089 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
8090 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
8091 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
8092 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
8093 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
8095 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
8096 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
8097 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
8098 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
8099 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
8101 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
8102 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
8103 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
8104 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
8106 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
8107 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
8109 @item @code{none} (default)
8112 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8113 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
8117 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
8118 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
8119 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
8120 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
8121 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
8122 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
8123 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
8124 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
8125 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
8126 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
8129 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
8130 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
8131 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
8132 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
8133 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
8134 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
8135 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
8136 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
8137 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
8138 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
8140 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
8141 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
8142 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
8143 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
8144 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
8145 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
8146 language-recognition power.
8148 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
8151 @item Infinite parsing loops.
8153 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
8154 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
8155 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
8156 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
8159 @item Verbose error message limitations.
8161 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
8162 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
8163 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
8164 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
8165 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
8166 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
8170 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
8171 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
8172 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
8173 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
8174 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
8175 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
8176 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
8177 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
8178 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
8179 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
8180 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
8183 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
8184 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
8185 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
8187 @node Unreachable States
8188 @subsection Unreachable States
8189 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
8190 @cindex unreachable states
8192 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
8193 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
8194 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
8195 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
8197 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8198 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8199 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8200 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8202 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state} @var{value}
8203 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8204 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8207 There are a few caveats to consider:
8210 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8212 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8213 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8214 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8215 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8216 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8217 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8219 @item Other useless states.
8221 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8222 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8223 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8224 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8225 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8226 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8227 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8230 @node Generalized LR Parsing
8231 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8233 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8234 @cindex ambiguous grammars
8235 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
8237 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8238 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8239 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8240 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8241 context-free languages.
8242 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8243 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8244 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8245 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8246 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8247 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8248 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8249 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8251 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8252 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8253 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8254 parser uses the same basic
8255 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8256 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8257 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8258 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8260 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8261 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8262 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8263 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8264 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8266 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8267 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8268 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8269 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8270 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8271 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8272 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8273 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8274 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8275 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8276 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8279 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8280 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8281 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8282 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8283 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8284 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8285 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8286 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8287 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8288 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8289 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8290 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8292 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8293 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8294 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8296 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8297 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8298 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8299 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8300 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8301 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8302 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8303 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8304 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8305 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8306 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8307 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8309 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8312 @node Memory Management
8313 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8314 @cindex memory exhaustion
8315 @cindex memory management
8316 @cindex stack overflow
8317 @cindex parser stack overflow
8318 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8320 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8321 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8322 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8324 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8325 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8326 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8329 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8330 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8331 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8332 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8334 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8335 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8336 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8337 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8338 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8339 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8341 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8342 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8343 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8346 @cindex default stack limit
8347 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8351 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8352 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8353 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8354 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8355 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8357 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8359 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8360 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8361 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8362 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8363 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8364 non-trivial copy constructors.
8365 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8368 @node Error Recovery
8369 @chapter Error Recovery
8370 @cindex error recovery
8371 @cindex recovery from errors
8373 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8374 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8375 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8378 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8379 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8380 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8381 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8382 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8383 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8384 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8387 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8388 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8389 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8390 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8391 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8392 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8404 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8405 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8407 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8408 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8409 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8410 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8411 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8412 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8413 applicable in the ordinary way.
8415 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8416 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8417 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8418 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8419 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8420 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8421 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8422 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8423 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8424 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8425 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8426 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8428 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8429 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8430 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8433 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8436 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8437 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8438 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8439 spurious error message:
8449 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8450 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8451 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8452 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8453 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8454 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8455 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8458 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8459 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8460 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8461 error messages resume.
8463 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8464 as any other rules can.
8467 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8468 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8469 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8470 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8473 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8474 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8475 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8477 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8479 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8480 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8481 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8482 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8483 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8485 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8486 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8487 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8488 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8491 @node Context Dependency
8492 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8494 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8495 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8496 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8497 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8501 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8502 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8503 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8504 error recovery rules must be written.
8507 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8508 neither clean nor robust.)
8510 @node Semantic Tokens
8511 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8513 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8514 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8520 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8521 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8522 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8524 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8525 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8526 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8527 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8528 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8530 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8531 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8532 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8533 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8534 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8535 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8536 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8538 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8539 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8540 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8541 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8545 typedef int foo, bar;
8549 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8550 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8556 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8557 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8559 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8560 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8561 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8562 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8563 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8568 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8569 | declarator maybeasm
8575 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8576 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8582 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8583 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8584 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8586 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8587 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8588 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8589 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8590 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8591 the syntactic context.
8593 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8594 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8595 @cindex lexical tie-in
8597 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8598 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8601 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8602 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8603 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8604 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8605 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8612 void yyerror (char const *);
8621 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8622 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8623 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8637 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8638 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8639 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8641 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8642 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8643 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8646 @node Tie-in Recovery
8647 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8649 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8650 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8652 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8653 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8654 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8655 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8660 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8662 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8666 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8667 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8668 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8669 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8670 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8672 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8674 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8675 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8676 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8682 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8688 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8689 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8690 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8691 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8693 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8694 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8695 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8696 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8697 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8698 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8701 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8704 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8706 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8707 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8708 chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8710 The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8711 They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8712 automaton. There are several formats available:
8715 as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8718 as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8721 or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8722 @ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8725 The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8726 and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8730 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8731 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8732 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8733 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8737 @section Understanding Your Parser
8739 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8740 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8741 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8742 tune or simply fix a parser.
8744 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8745 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8746 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8747 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8748 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8749 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8750 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8752 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8774 @command{bison} reports:
8777 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8778 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8779 calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8780 calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8781 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8784 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8785 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8786 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8787 interpretation is the same.
8790 @cindex token, useless
8791 @cindex useless token
8792 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8793 @cindex useless nonterminal
8794 @cindex rule, useless
8795 @cindex useless rule
8796 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8797 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8798 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8799 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8802 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8805 Terminals unused in grammar
8808 Rules useless in grammar
8813 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8816 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8817 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8818 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8819 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8823 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8838 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8842 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8855 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8860 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8866 @cindex pointed rule
8867 @cindex rule, pointed
8868 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8869 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8870 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8871 the location of the input cursor.
8876 0 $accept: . exp $end
8878 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8883 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8884 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8885 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8886 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8887 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8888 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8889 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8890 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8892 @cindex core, item set
8893 @cindex item set core
8894 @cindex kernel, item set
8895 @cindex item set core
8896 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8897 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8898 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8899 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8900 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8901 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8906 0 $accept: . exp $end
8907 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8913 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8919 In the state 1@dots{}
8926 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8930 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8931 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8932 State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8933 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8938 0 $accept: exp . $end
8939 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8944 $end shift, and go to state 3
8945 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8946 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8947 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8948 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8952 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8953 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8954 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8955 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8956 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8959 @cindex accepting state
8960 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8966 0 $accept: exp $end .
8972 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8973 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8975 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8981 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8983 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8990 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8992 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8999 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
9001 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9008 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
9010 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9015 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
9021 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9027 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9028 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9030 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9031 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9034 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
9035 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
9036 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
9037 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
9038 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
9039 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
9040 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
9041 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
9043 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
9044 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
9045 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
9048 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
9049 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
9050 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
9051 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
9052 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
9053 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
9054 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
9055 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
9056 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
9057 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
9058 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
9059 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
9064 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9065 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
9070 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9071 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9073 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9074 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9077 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
9078 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
9079 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
9080 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
9081 conflicts in the report:
9084 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
9085 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
9086 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
9090 The remaining states are similar:
9096 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9102 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9103 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9105 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
9106 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
9112 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9118 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9120 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
9121 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
9127 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9133 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9134 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9135 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9136 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9138 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9139 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9140 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9141 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9142 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
9147 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
9148 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
9149 also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
9151 Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
9152 XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
9154 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
9157 @section Visualizing Your Parser
9160 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
9161 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
9162 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
9163 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
9164 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
9165 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
9166 to help them understand LR parsers.
9168 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
9169 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
9170 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
9171 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
9172 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
9173 produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
9174 parser in multiple formats}).
9177 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
9188 The graphical output
9190 (see @ref{fig:graph})
9192 is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
9193 making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
9194 Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
9197 @float Figure,fig:graph
9198 @image{figs/example, 430pt}
9199 @caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
9203 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
9205 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
9206 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
9207 about transitions, for examples
9209 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
9210 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
9211 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
9216 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
9219 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
9221 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
9222 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
9230 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9234 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9236 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9238 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9240 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9241 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9242 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9243 action for the given state, there is no such label.
9245 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9252 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9253 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9256 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9258 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9260 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9261 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9262 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9263 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9264 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9266 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
9267 state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
9269 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9271 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9272 the name of the rule being jumped to.
9274 @c ================================================= XML
9277 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9280 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9281 (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
9282 with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9283 (@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
9284 option @option{--graph}. However,
9285 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9286 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9287 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9288 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9289 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9290 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9292 The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9293 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9294 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9295 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9296 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9297 file is @file{foo.xml}.
9299 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9300 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9304 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9306 Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
9308 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
9311 Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
9315 $ bison --print-datadir
9316 /usr/local/share/bison
9318 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
9321 @c ================================================= Tracing
9324 @section Tracing Your Parser
9327 @cindex tracing the parser
9329 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9330 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9333 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9334 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9335 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9338 @node Enabling Traces
9339 @subsection Enabling Traces
9340 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9343 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9345 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9346 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9347 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9348 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9351 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9352 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9353 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9354 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9355 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9357 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9358 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9359 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9360 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9361 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9363 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
9365 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9366 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9367 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9369 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9370 @findex %define parse.trace
9371 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9372 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9373 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9374 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9375 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9378 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9382 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9383 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9384 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9385 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9386 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9387 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9389 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9390 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9391 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9392 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9394 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9395 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9396 messages tell you these things:
9400 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9403 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9404 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9407 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9408 of the state stack afterward.
9411 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9412 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9413 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9414 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9415 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9416 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9417 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9418 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9419 grammar are to blame.
9421 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9422 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9423 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9424 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9425 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9428 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9430 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9431 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9432 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9433 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9434 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9435 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9437 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9438 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9439 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9442 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9444 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9446 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9449 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9450 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9451 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9452 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
9455 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9456 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9457 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9458 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9459 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9460 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9462 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9463 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9464 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9465 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
9466 printer will be used for them.
9468 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9469 are sent onto standard error.
9472 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9475 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9476 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9482 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9483 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9484 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9485 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9487 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9489 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9490 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9495 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9496 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9497 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9501 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9502 Shifting token '(' ()
9504 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9505 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9507 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9508 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9509 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9515 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9516 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9517 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9520 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9521 Shifting token '-' ()
9523 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9524 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9526 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9527 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9528 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9529 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9531 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9532 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9533 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9535 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9536 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9542 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9543 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9546 Next token is token ')' ()
9547 Shifting token ')' ()
9549 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9550 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9552 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9554 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9560 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9564 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9565 Shifting token '\n' ()
9567 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9568 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9571 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9574 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9577 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9582 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9583 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9584 completion of the parsing.
9587 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9588 Shifting token $end ()
9591 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9592 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9596 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9597 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9600 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9601 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9602 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9604 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9606 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9607 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9608 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9610 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9613 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9614 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9618 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9619 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9620 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9623 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9626 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9629 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9630 else if (type == NUM)
9631 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9635 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9638 @chapter Invoking Bison
9639 @cindex invoking Bison
9640 @cindex Bison invocation
9641 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9643 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9649 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9650 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9651 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9652 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9653 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9654 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9655 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9656 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9657 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9658 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9659 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9664 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9667 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9670 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9673 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9675 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9676 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9677 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9680 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9681 in alphabetical order by short options.
9682 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9683 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9687 @section Bison Options
9689 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9690 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9691 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9692 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9693 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9696 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9697 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9700 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9706 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9710 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9712 @item --print-localedir
9713 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9715 @item --print-datadir
9716 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9720 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9721 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9722 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9723 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9724 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9725 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9726 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9727 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9728 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9729 for compatibility with POSIX:
9736 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9737 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9738 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9739 this option is specified.
9741 @item -W [@var{category}]
9742 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9743 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9746 @item midrule-values
9747 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9749 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9752 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9755 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9756 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9759 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9762 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9763 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9764 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9767 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9771 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9772 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9773 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9774 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9775 no effect on the conflict report.
9778 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9782 Empty rules without @code{%empty}. @xref{Empty Rules}. Disabled by
9783 default, but enabled by uses of @code{%empty}, unless
9784 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
9787 Useless precedence and associativity directives. Disabled by default.
9789 Consider for instance the following grammar:
9818 @c cannot leave the location and the [-Wprecedence] for lack of
9822 warning: useless precedence and associativity for "="
9827 warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence
9832 warning: useless precedence for "("
9838 One would get the exact same parser with the following directives instead:
9848 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9850 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9851 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9857 Turn off all the warnings.
9859 See @option{-Werror}, below.
9862 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9863 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9864 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9866 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
9867 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
9868 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
9869 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
9871 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
9872 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
9874 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
9875 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
9878 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
9879 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
9880 S/R conflicts as errors.
9883 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
9884 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
9887 @item -f [@var{feature}]
9888 @itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
9889 Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
9892 @itemx diagnostics-show-caret
9893 Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
9894 @option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
9895 location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
9896 the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
9897 an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
9902 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9905 When invoked with @option{-fcaret} (or nothing), Bison will report:
9909 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
9910 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9914 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
9915 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9919 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
9920 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9924 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
9925 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9929 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
9930 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9935 Whereas, when invoked with @option{-fno-caret}, Bison will only report:
9939 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: ‘$exp’
9940 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
9941 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
9942 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
9943 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of ‘exp’ has no declared type
9947 This option is activated by default.
9958 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9959 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9960 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9962 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9963 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9964 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9965 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9966 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9967 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9968 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9972 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9975 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9976 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9977 definition for @var{name}.
9979 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9980 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9981 definitions for @var{name}.
9983 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9984 definitions for @var{name}.
9987 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9988 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9989 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9991 @item -L @var{language}
9992 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9993 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9994 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9995 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9996 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9999 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10001 @item -p @var{prefix}
10002 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
10003 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
10004 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
10005 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
10009 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
10010 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
10011 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
10012 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
10013 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
10014 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
10016 @item -S @var{file}
10017 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
10018 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
10019 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
10021 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
10022 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
10023 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
10024 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
10026 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
10027 file in the Bison installation directory.
10028 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
10029 current working directory.
10030 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
10033 @itemx --token-table
10034 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10041 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
10042 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10043 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
10044 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10047 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
10048 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
10049 with other short options.
10051 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
10052 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
10053 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
10054 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10056 @item -r @var{things}
10057 @itemx --report=@var{things}
10058 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
10059 separated list of @var{things} among:
10063 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
10064 parser's automaton.
10067 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10068 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
10071 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10072 each rule's lookahead set.
10075 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
10076 precedence and associativity directives.
10079 Enable all the items.
10082 Do not generate the report.
10085 @item --report-file=@var{file}
10086 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
10090 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10091 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
10092 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10094 @item -o @var{file}
10095 @itemx --output=@var{file}
10096 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
10098 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
10099 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
10101 @item -g [@var{file}]
10102 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
10103 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
10104 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
10105 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
10106 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10107 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10110 @item -x [@var{file}]
10111 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
10112 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
10113 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10114 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10116 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
10117 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10120 @node Option Cross Key
10121 @section Option Cross Key
10123 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
10124 the corresponding short option and directive.
10126 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
10127 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
10128 @include cross-options.texi
10132 @section Yacc Library
10134 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
10135 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
10136 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
10137 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
10138 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
10139 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
10140 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
10142 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
10143 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
10146 int yyerror (char const *);
10149 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
10150 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
10151 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
10154 int yyparse (void);
10157 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
10159 @node Other Languages
10160 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
10163 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
10164 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
10168 @section C++ Parsers
10171 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
10172 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
10173 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
10174 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10175 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
10176 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
10179 @node C++ Bison Interface
10180 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
10181 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
10183 @c - initial action
10185 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
10186 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
10187 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
10188 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10190 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
10192 @findex %define api.namespace
10193 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
10194 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
10195 in the following files:
10200 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
10201 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
10202 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
10206 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
10208 @item @var{file}.hh
10209 @itemx @var{file}.cc
10210 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
10211 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
10212 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
10213 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
10215 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
10216 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
10217 @samp{%defines} directive.
10220 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
10221 for a complete and accurate documentation.
10223 @node C++ Semantic Values
10224 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
10225 @c - No objects in unions
10227 @c - Printer and destructor
10229 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
10230 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
10231 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
10232 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
10235 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
10236 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
10240 @subsubsection C++ Unions
10242 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
10243 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
10244 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
10247 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
10248 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
10249 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
10251 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
10252 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
10253 to such objects are allowed.
10256 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
10257 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
10258 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
10262 @subsubsection C++ Variants
10264 Bison provides a @emph{variant} based implementation of semantic values for
10265 C++. This alleviates all the limitations reported in the previous section,
10266 and in particular, object types can be used without pointers.
10268 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
10269 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
10270 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
10271 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
10273 For instance, instead of
10281 %token <ival> NUMBER;
10282 %token <sval> STRING;
10289 %token <int> NUMBER;
10290 %token <std::string> STRING;
10293 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
10294 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
10297 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
10298 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
10299 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
10301 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
10302 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
10303 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
10304 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
10305 eventually, destroyed.
10307 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
10308 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
10309 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
10312 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
10313 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
10317 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
10318 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
10319 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
10320 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
10321 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
10322 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
10323 that would be duplicating the information.
10325 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
10326 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
10327 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
10328 (the current implementation of) variants:
10331 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
10332 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
10333 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
10334 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
10335 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
10336 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
10339 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
10342 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
10343 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
10345 @node C++ Location Values
10346 @subsection C++ Location Values
10348 @c - class Position
10349 @c - class Location
10350 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10352 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10353 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10355 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10356 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10357 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10358 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10359 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10362 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10363 genuine code only the latter is used.
10366 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
10367 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10368 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10372 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10374 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10375 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10376 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10380 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10381 Reset the position to the given values.
10384 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10385 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10386 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10387 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10388 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10391 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10392 The line, starting at 1.
10395 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10396 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
10399 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10400 The column, starting at 1.
10403 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10404 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
10407 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10408 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10409 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10410 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10411 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10414 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10415 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10416 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10419 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10420 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10421 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10422 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10426 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10428 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10429 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10432 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10433 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10434 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10437 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10438 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10441 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10442 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10443 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10446 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10447 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10448 Advance the @code{end} position.
10451 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10452 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10453 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10454 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10457 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10458 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10461 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10462 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10463 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10467 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10468 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10469 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10472 @node User Defined Location Type
10473 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10474 @findex %define api.location.type
10476 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10477 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10480 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
10483 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10486 it must be copyable;
10489 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10490 parser basically runs
10492 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10493 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10496 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10499 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10500 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10503 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10504 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10509 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10510 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10511 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10512 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10517 %define namespace "master::"
10521 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10522 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10525 %define api.location.type "master::location"
10526 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10529 @node C++ Parser Interface
10530 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10531 @c - define parser_class_name
10533 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10535 @c - Reporting errors
10537 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10538 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10539 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10540 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
10541 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10542 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10543 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10544 additional argument for its constructor.
10546 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10547 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10548 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10551 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10552 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10553 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10554 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10555 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10556 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10559 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10560 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10561 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10562 equivalent with first
10563 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10564 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10565 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10566 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10567 function invoked from the user action.
10570 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10571 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10572 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10575 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10576 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10577 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10580 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10581 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10584 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10585 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10586 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10589 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10590 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10591 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10595 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10596 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10597 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10598 or nonzero, full tracing.
10601 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10602 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10603 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10604 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10605 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10610 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10611 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10612 @c - prefix for yylex.
10613 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10616 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10617 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10618 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10619 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10622 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10623 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10626 @node Split Symbols
10627 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10629 The interface is as follows.
10631 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10632 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10633 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10634 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10635 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10638 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10639 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10641 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10645 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10646 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10649 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10650 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10654 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10655 initialized. So the code would look like:
10659 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10660 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10663 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10664 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10673 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10674 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10677 yylval.build(yytext);
10678 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10683 @node Complete Symbols
10684 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10686 If you specified both @code{%define api.value.type variant} and
10687 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10688 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10689 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10690 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10691 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10693 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10694 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10695 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10696 the @var{location}.
10699 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10700 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10701 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10702 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10704 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10706 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10707 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10708 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10709 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10710 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10711 also pass the @var{location}.
10714 For instance, given the following declarations:
10717 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10718 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10719 %token <int> INTEGER;
10724 Bison generates the following functions:
10727 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10728 const location_type& l);
10729 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10730 const location_type& loc);
10731 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10735 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10738 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10739 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10740 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10743 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10744 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10746 @node A Complete C++ Example
10747 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10749 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10750 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10751 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10752 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10753 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10754 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10755 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10756 actually easier to interface with.
10759 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10760 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10761 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10762 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10763 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10766 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10767 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10769 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10770 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10771 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10772 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10773 of valid input follows.
10777 seven := one + two * three
10781 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10782 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10784 @c - A place to store error messages
10785 @c - A place for the result
10787 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10788 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10789 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10790 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10791 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10792 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10793 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10795 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10796 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10797 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10800 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10802 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10803 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10806 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10811 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10812 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10813 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10814 factor both as follows.
10816 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10818 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10820 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
10821 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10826 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10829 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10831 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10832 class calcxx_driver
10836 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10838 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10844 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10845 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10847 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10849 // Handling the scanner.
10850 void scan_begin ();
10852 bool trace_scanning;
10856 Similarly for the parser itself.
10858 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10860 // Run the parser on file F.
10861 // Return 0 on success.
10862 int parse (const std::string& f);
10863 // The name of the file being parsed.
10864 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10866 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10867 bool trace_parsing;
10871 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10872 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10873 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10874 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10876 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10879 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10880 void error (const std::string& m);
10882 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10885 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10886 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10887 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10888 messages and set error state.
10890 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10892 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10893 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10895 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10896 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10898 variables["one"] = 1;
10899 variables["two"] = 2;
10902 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10907 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10911 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10912 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10913 int res = parser.parse ();
10919 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10921 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10925 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10927 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10931 @node Calc++ Parser
10932 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10934 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10935 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10936 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10937 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10940 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10942 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10943 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10945 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10949 @findex %define api.token.constructor
10950 @findex %define api.value.type variant
10951 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
10952 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
10953 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
10954 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
10956 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10958 %define api.token.constructor
10959 %define api.value.type variant
10960 %define parse.assert
10964 @findex %code requires
10965 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
10966 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
10967 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
10968 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
10969 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10970 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
10971 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
10973 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10978 class calcxx_driver;
10983 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10984 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10987 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10989 // The parsing context.
10990 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10994 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
10995 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10996 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10999 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11004 // Initialize the initial location.
11005 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
11010 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
11011 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
11014 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11016 %define parse.trace
11017 %define parse.error verbose
11022 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
11023 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
11025 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11029 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11035 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
11036 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
11037 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
11038 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
11039 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
11041 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11043 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
11045 END 0 "end of file"
11057 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
11058 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
11061 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11063 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
11064 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
11069 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
11070 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
11071 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
11072 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
11074 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11076 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
11080 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
11081 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
11083 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11087 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
11090 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
11091 | assignments assignment @{@};
11094 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
11099 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
11100 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
11101 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
11102 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
11103 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
11104 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
11105 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
11110 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
11113 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11116 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
11117 const std::string& m)
11119 driver.error (l, m);
11123 @node Calc++ Scanner
11124 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
11126 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
11127 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
11129 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11131 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
11133 # include <climits>
11134 # include <cstdlib>
11136 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11137 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11139 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
11140 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
11141 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
11142 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
11144 # define yywrap() 1
11146 // The location of the current token.
11147 static yy::location loc;
11152 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
11153 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
11154 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
11155 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
11157 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11159 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug noinput
11163 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
11165 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11167 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
11173 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
11174 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
11175 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
11176 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
11177 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
11178 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
11179 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
11181 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11185 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
11186 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
11192 // Code run each time yylex is called.
11196 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
11197 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
11201 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
11203 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11205 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
11206 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
11207 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
11208 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
11209 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
11210 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
11211 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
11216 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
11217 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
11218 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
11219 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
11222 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
11223 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
11224 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
11229 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
11230 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
11232 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11236 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
11238 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
11239 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
11241 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
11243 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
11244 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11251 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
11258 @node Calc++ Top Level
11259 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
11261 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
11263 @comment file: calc++.cc
11265 #include <iostream>
11266 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11270 main (int argc, char *argv[])
11273 calcxx_driver driver;
11274 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
11275 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
11276 driver.trace_parsing = true;
11277 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
11278 driver.trace_scanning = true;
11279 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
11280 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
11289 @section Java Parsers
11292 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
11293 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
11294 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
11295 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
11296 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
11297 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
11298 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11299 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
11302 @node Java Bison Interface
11303 @subsection Java Bison Interface
11304 @c - %language "Java"
11306 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
11307 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11309 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
11310 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
11312 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11313 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
11314 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
11315 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
11316 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
11317 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
11318 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
11319 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
11320 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
11321 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
11323 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
11325 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
11326 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
11327 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
11328 and @code{%define api.pure} directives do nothing when used in Java.
11330 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
11331 api.push-pull} have no effect.
11333 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
11334 @code{glr-parser} directive.
11336 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
11337 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
11339 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
11340 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
11341 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
11343 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
11344 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
11345 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11347 if needed. Also, in the future the
11348 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11349 access the token names and codes.
11351 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11352 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11353 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11354 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11357 @node Java Semantic Values
11358 @subsection Java Semantic Values
11359 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11361 @c - Printer and destructor
11363 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11364 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11365 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11368 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11369 %type <Integer> number
11372 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11373 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11374 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11375 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define api.value.type}
11376 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11379 %define api.value.type "ASTNode"
11383 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11384 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11386 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11387 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11388 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11389 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11390 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11391 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11393 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11394 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11395 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11397 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11398 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11399 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11402 @node Java Location Values
11403 @subsection Java Location Values
11405 @c - class Position
11406 @c - class Location
11408 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11409 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11410 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11411 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11412 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11413 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11414 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
11416 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11417 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11418 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
11419 be supplied by the user.
11422 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11423 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11424 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11427 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11428 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11431 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11432 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11435 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11436 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11437 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11438 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
11442 @node Java Parser Interface
11443 @subsection Java Parser Interface
11444 @c - define parser_class_name
11446 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11448 @c - Reporting errors
11450 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11451 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11452 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11453 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
11454 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11456 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11457 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11458 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11459 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11460 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11461 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11462 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
11463 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11465 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11466 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11467 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11468 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11470 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11471 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11472 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11473 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11474 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11475 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11477 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11478 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11479 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11480 which initialize them automatically.
11482 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11483 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11484 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11485 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11487 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11488 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11489 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11492 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11493 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11494 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11497 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11498 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11499 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11501 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11502 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11503 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11506 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11507 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11508 @code{false} otherwise.
11511 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11512 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11513 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11514 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11515 verbose error messages.
11518 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11519 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11520 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11521 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11522 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11523 available only if location tracking is active.
11526 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11527 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11528 from a syntax error.
11529 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11532 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11533 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11534 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11538 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11539 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11540 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11541 or nonzero, full tracing.
11544 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11545 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11546 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11550 @node Java Scanner Interface
11551 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11554 @c - Lexer interface
11556 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11557 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11558 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11559 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11560 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11563 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11564 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11565 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11566 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11569 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11570 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11571 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11572 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11575 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11577 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11578 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11579 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11580 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
11583 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11584 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11585 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11588 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11589 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11592 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11593 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11594 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11595 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11596 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11598 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11599 "@var{class-name}".}
11602 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11603 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11605 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define api.value.type
11606 "@var{class-name}".}
11610 @node Java Action Features
11611 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11613 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11614 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11616 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11617 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11620 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11621 This may not be assigned to.
11622 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11625 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11626 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11627 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11631 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11632 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11633 @samp{%define api.value.type}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11634 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11635 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11636 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11639 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11640 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11641 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11642 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11644 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11648 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11649 This may not be assigned to.
11650 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11654 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11655 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11658 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11659 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11660 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11663 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11664 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11665 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11668 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11669 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11670 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11673 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11674 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11675 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11677 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11680 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11681 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11682 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11683 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11684 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11685 available only if location tracking is active.
11689 @node Java Differences
11690 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11692 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11693 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11694 section summarizes these differences.
11698 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11699 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11700 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11701 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11702 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11703 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11704 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11706 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11707 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11708 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11709 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11710 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11713 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11714 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11715 @samp{%define api.value.type}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11716 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11717 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11718 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11719 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11720 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11721 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11724 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11726 @item @code{%code imports}
11727 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11728 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11729 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11731 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11732 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11734 @item @code{%code lexer}
11735 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11736 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11737 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11741 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11742 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11743 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11745 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11746 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11751 @node Java Declarations Summary
11752 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11754 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11755 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11757 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11758 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11761 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11762 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11763 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11764 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11765 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11768 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11769 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11770 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11771 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11774 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11775 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11776 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11777 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11780 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11781 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11782 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11785 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11786 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11787 a Java @emph{type}.
11788 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11791 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11792 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11793 @xref{Java Differences}.
11796 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11797 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11798 @xref{Java Differences}.
11801 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11802 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
11803 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11806 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11807 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11808 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11811 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11812 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11813 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11814 @xref{Java Differences}.
11817 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11818 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
11819 @xref{Java Differences}.
11822 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11823 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11824 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11827 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
11828 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
11829 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11832 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11833 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11834 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11837 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11838 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11839 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11842 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11843 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11845 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11848 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11849 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11850 constructor. Default is none.
11851 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11854 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11855 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11856 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11857 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11860 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
11861 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11862 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11863 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11864 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
11865 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11868 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11869 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11870 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11873 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11874 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11875 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11876 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11879 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
11880 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11881 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11882 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
11883 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11886 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11887 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11888 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11891 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.value.type} "@var{class}"
11892 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11893 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11896 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11897 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11898 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11901 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11902 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11903 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11904 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11908 @c ================================================= FAQ
11911 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11912 @cindex frequently asked questions
11915 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11919 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11920 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11921 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11922 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11923 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11924 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11925 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11926 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11927 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11928 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11929 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11930 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11933 @node Memory Exhausted
11934 @section Memory Exhausted
11937 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11938 message. What can I do?
11941 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11944 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11945 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11947 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11948 following typical questions:
11951 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11952 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11953 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11960 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11961 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11962 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
11965 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11966 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11967 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11968 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11969 @file{first-line.l}:
11975 #include <stdlib.h>
11979 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11983 yyparse (char const *file)
11985 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11989 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11993 /* One token only. */
11995 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11998 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12016 If the file @file{input} contains
12024 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
12027 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
12028 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
12029 $ @kbd{./first-line}
12034 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
12035 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
12036 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
12037 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
12038 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
12039 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
12040 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
12041 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
12044 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
12045 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
12046 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
12047 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
12049 @node Strings are Destroyed
12050 @section Strings are Destroyed
12053 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
12054 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
12055 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
12058 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
12059 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
12060 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
12066 char *yylval = NULL;
12071 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
12079 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
12080 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
12081 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
12082 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
12088 If you compile and run this code, you get:
12091 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12092 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12093 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12099 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
12100 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
12101 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
12102 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
12103 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
12104 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
12107 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12108 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12109 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12114 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
12115 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
12118 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
12119 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
12122 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
12123 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
12124 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
12125 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
12126 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
12127 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
12128 execute simple instructions one after the others.
12130 @cindex abstract syntax tree
12132 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
12133 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
12134 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
12135 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
12136 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
12137 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
12140 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
12141 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
12144 @node Multiple start-symbols
12145 @section Multiple start-symbols
12148 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
12149 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
12150 multiple entry points.
12153 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
12154 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
12155 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
12156 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
12160 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
12167 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
12168 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
12170 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
12171 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
12172 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
12173 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
12174 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
12175 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
12176 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
12177 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
12180 /* @r{Prologue.} */
12185 int t = start_token;
12190 /* @r{The rules.} */
12194 @node Secure? Conform?
12195 @section Secure? Conform?
12198 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
12201 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
12202 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
12203 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
12204 please send us a bug report.
12206 @node I can't build Bison
12207 @section I can't build Bison
12210 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
12211 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
12215 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
12216 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
12217 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
12218 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
12219 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
12220 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
12221 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
12224 @node Where can I find help?
12225 @section Where can I find help?
12228 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
12231 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
12232 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
12233 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
12234 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
12235 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
12236 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
12237 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
12238 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
12242 @section Bug Reports
12245 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
12248 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
12249 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
12250 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
12251 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
12252 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
12254 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
12255 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
12256 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
12257 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
12258 easier it will be to fix the bug.
12260 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
12261 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
12262 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
12263 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
12264 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
12265 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
12267 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
12268 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
12270 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
12272 @node More Languages
12273 @section More Languages
12276 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
12277 favorite language here}?
12280 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
12281 languages; contributions are welcome.
12284 @section Beta Testing
12287 What is involved in being a beta tester?
12290 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
12291 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
12292 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
12293 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
12294 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
12295 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
12296 essentially halted.
12298 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
12299 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
12300 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
12301 systems are especially welcome.
12303 @node Mailing Lists
12304 @section Mailing Lists
12307 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
12310 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
12312 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
12314 @node Table of Symbols
12315 @appendix Bison Symbols
12316 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
12317 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
12319 @deffn {Variable} @@$
12320 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
12321 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12324 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
12325 @deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
12326 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
12327 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12329 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12330 with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12333 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
12334 @deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
12335 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12336 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12339 @deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
12340 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12341 with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12344 @deffn {Variable} $$
12345 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
12349 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
12350 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
12351 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12354 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12355 @deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12356 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12360 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
12361 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12362 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12363 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12366 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12367 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12368 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12369 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12370 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12374 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12375 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12376 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12377 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12378 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12379 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12380 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12382 This feature is experimental.
12383 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12387 @deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
12388 @deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
12389 Comments, as in C/C++.
12392 @deffn {Delimiter} :
12393 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12397 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
12398 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12401 @deffn {Delimiter} |
12402 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12403 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12406 @deffn {Directive} <*>
12407 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12410 This feature is experimental.
12411 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12414 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12417 @deffn {Directive} <>
12418 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12421 This feature is experimental.
12422 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12425 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12428 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
12429 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12430 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12431 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12434 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12435 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12436 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12437 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12438 @xref{%code Summary}.
12441 @deffn {Directive} %debug
12442 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12446 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12447 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12448 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12453 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12454 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12455 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12456 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12459 @deffn {Directive} %defines
12460 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12461 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12464 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12465 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12466 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12469 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
12470 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12471 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12474 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
12475 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12476 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12480 @deffn {Directive} %empty
12481 Bison declaration to declare make explicit that a rule has an empty
12482 right-hand side. @xref{Empty Rules}.
12485 @deffn {Symbol} $end
12486 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12487 used in the grammar.
12490 @deffn {Symbol} error
12491 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12492 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12493 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12494 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12495 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12496 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12497 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12498 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12501 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12502 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12503 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12506 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12507 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12511 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12512 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12513 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12516 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12517 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12520 @deffn {Directive} %language
12521 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12522 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12525 @deffn {Directive} %left
12526 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12527 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12530 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12531 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12532 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12536 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12537 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12538 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12539 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12540 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12543 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12544 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12545 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12547 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12548 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12549 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12551 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12552 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12553 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12554 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12555 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12556 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12557 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12558 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
12563 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12564 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12565 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12570 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12571 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12572 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12575 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12576 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12577 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12580 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12581 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12582 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12585 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12586 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12587 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12588 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12591 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12592 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12593 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12596 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12597 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12598 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12601 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12602 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12603 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12606 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12607 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12608 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12609 unreasonable usage.
12612 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12613 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12614 Require a Version of Bison}.
12617 @deffn {Directive} %right
12618 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12619 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12622 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12623 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12624 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12627 @deffn {Directive} %start
12628 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12632 @deffn {Directive} %token
12633 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12634 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12637 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12638 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12639 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12642 @deffn {Directive} %type
12643 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12644 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12647 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12648 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12649 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12653 @deffn {Directive} %union
12654 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12655 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
12658 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12659 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12660 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12661 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12662 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12664 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12668 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12669 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12670 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12671 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12673 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12677 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12678 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12679 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12682 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12683 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12684 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12685 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12686 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12689 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12690 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12691 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12694 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12695 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12696 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12699 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12700 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12701 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12702 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12705 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12706 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12707 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12710 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12711 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12712 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12713 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12714 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12715 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12717 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12721 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12722 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12723 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12726 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12727 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12728 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12729 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12730 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12731 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12732 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12735 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12736 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12737 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12740 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12741 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12742 @xref{Memory Management}.
12745 @deffn {Function} yylex
12746 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12747 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12751 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12752 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12753 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12754 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12756 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12758 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12759 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12760 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12763 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12764 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12765 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12768 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12769 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12770 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12771 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12773 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12774 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12775 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12778 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12779 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12783 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12784 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12785 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12786 pure push parser, it is a member of @code{yypstate}.)
12787 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12790 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12791 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12792 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12795 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
12796 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
12797 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
12798 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
12801 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
12802 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12803 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
12804 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
12805 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
12806 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12807 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12810 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
12811 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12812 call this function to create a new parser.
12813 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
12814 @code{yypstate_new}}.
12815 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12816 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12819 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
12820 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12821 parse the rest of the input stream.
12822 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
12823 @code{yypull_parse}}.
12824 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12825 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12828 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
12829 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12830 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
12831 @code{yypush_parse}}.
12832 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12833 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12836 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12837 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12838 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12839 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12842 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12843 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12844 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12845 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12846 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12847 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12848 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12850 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12851 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12852 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12853 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12854 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12855 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12856 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12859 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12860 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12861 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12869 @item Accepting state
12870 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12871 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12872 @xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
12874 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12875 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12876 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12877 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12878 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12880 @item Consistent state
12881 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12883 @item Context-free grammars
12884 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12885 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12886 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12887 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12890 @item Default reduction
12891 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12892 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12893 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12894 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12897 @item Defaulted state
12898 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12900 @item Dynamic allocation
12901 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12902 compile time or on entry to a function.
12905 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12906 character string of length zero.
12908 @item Finite-state stack machine
12909 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12910 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12911 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12912 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12913 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12914 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12916 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12917 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12918 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12919 deterministic parsing
12920 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
12921 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
12922 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
12926 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
12927 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
12928 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12930 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
12931 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
12932 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
12933 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
12934 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
12935 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
12936 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
12937 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
12938 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
12939 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12941 @item Infix operator
12942 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12943 performs some operation.
12946 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12948 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12949 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12950 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12951 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12952 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12953 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12954 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12956 @item Language construct
12957 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12958 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12959 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12961 @item Left associativity
12962 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12963 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12964 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12966 @item Left recursion
12967 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12968 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12971 @item Left-to-right parsing
12972 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12973 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12975 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12976 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12977 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12979 @item Lexical tie-in
12980 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12981 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12983 @item Literal string token
12984 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12986 @item Lookahead token
12987 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12991 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12992 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12993 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12996 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12997 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12999 @item Nonterminal symbol
13000 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
13001 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
13002 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
13005 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
13006 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
13009 @item Postfix operator
13010 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
13011 performs some operation.
13014 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
13015 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
13019 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
13020 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
13021 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
13023 @item Reverse polish notation
13024 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
13026 @item Right recursion
13027 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
13028 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13032 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
13033 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
13034 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
13037 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
13038 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
13039 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13041 @item Single-character literal
13042 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
13043 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
13046 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
13047 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
13048 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
13049 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
13052 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
13053 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
13054 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
13057 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
13058 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
13061 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
13062 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
13063 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
13064 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
13066 @item Terminal symbol
13067 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
13068 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
13069 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13071 @item Unreachable state
13072 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
13073 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
13074 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
13077 @node Copying This Manual
13078 @appendix Copying This Manual
13082 @unnumbered Bibliography
13086 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
13087 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
13088 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
13089 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
13091 @item [Denny 2010 May]
13092 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
13093 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
13094 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
13095 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
13097 @item [Denny 2010 November]
13098 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
13099 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
13100 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
13101 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
13103 @item [DeRemer 1982]
13104 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
13105 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
13106 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
13107 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
13110 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
13111 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
13112 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
13115 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
13116 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
13117 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
13118 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
13121 @node Index of Terms
13122 @unnumbered Index of Terms
13128 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
13129 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
13130 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
13131 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
13132 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
13133 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
13134 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
13135 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
13136 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
13137 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
13138 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
13139 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
13140 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
13141 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
13142 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
13143 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
13144 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
13145 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
13146 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
13147 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
13148 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
13149 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
13150 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
13151 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
13152 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
13153 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
13154 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
13155 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
13156 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
13157 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
13158 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
13159 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
13160 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
13161 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
13162 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
13163 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
13164 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
13165 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
13166 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
13167 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
13168 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
13169 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
13170 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
13171 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
13172 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
13173 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
13174 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
13175 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
13176 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
13177 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
13178 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
13179 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
13180 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
13181 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
13182 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
13183 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
13184 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
13185 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
13187 @c Local Variables:
13188 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"