1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
227 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
228 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
229 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
230 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
231 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
233 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
235 Parser C-Language Interface
237 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
238 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
241 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
242 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
244 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
245 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
246 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
249 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
251 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
252 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
253 of the token it has read.
254 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
255 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
257 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
258 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
260 The Bison Parser Algorithm
262 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
263 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
264 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
265 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
266 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
267 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
268 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
269 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
270 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
271 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
275 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
276 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
277 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
278 * How Precedence:: How they work.
282 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
283 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
284 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
285 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
287 Handling Context Dependencies
289 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
290 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
291 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
292 error recovery rules must be written.
294 Debugging Your Parser
296 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
297 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
298 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
302 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
303 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
304 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
308 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
309 in alphabetical order by short options.
310 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
311 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
313 Parsers Written In Other Languages
315 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
316 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
320 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
321 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
322 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
323 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
324 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
325 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
329 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
330 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
331 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
333 A Complete C++ Example
335 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
336 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
337 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
338 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
339 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
343 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
344 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
345 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
346 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
347 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
348 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
349 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
350 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
352 Frequently Asked Questions
354 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
355 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
356 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
357 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
358 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
359 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
360 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
361 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
362 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
363 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
364 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
365 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
369 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
375 @unnumbered Introduction
378 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
379 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
380 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
381 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
382 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
383 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
384 calculators to complex programming languages.
386 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
387 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
388 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
389 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
390 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
393 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
394 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
395 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
396 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
399 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
400 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
401 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
402 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
403 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
404 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
407 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
410 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
412 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
413 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
414 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
415 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
416 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
418 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
420 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
421 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
422 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
423 License to all of the Bison source code.
425 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
426 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
427 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
428 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
429 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
430 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
431 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
433 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
434 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
435 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
436 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
437 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
438 using the other GNU tools.
440 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
441 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
442 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
443 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
447 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
448 @include gpl-3.0.texi
451 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
453 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
454 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
455 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
458 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
459 as mathematical ideas.
460 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
461 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
462 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
463 the name of an identifier, etc.).
464 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
465 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
466 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
467 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
468 how is the output used?
469 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
470 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
473 @node Language and Grammar
474 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
476 @cindex context-free grammar
477 @cindex grammar, context-free
478 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
479 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
480 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
481 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
482 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
483 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
484 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
485 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
489 @cindex Backus-Naur form
490 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
491 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
492 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
493 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
494 essentially machine-readable BNF.
496 @cindex LALR grammars
497 @cindex IELR grammars
499 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
500 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
501 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
502 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
503 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
504 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
505 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
506 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
507 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
508 Construction}, to learn how.
511 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
512 @cindex ambiguous grammars
513 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
515 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
516 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
517 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
518 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
519 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
520 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
521 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
522 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
523 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
524 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
525 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
526 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
527 possible parses of any given string is finite.
529 @cindex symbols (abstract)
531 @cindex syntactic grouping
532 @cindex grouping, syntactic
533 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
534 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
535 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
536 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
537 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
538 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
539 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
541 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
542 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
543 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
544 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
545 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
546 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
547 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
548 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
549 lexicography, not grammar.)
551 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
554 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
555 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
556 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
557 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
558 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
559 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
560 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
563 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
564 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
565 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
566 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
567 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
568 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
569 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
570 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
572 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
573 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
574 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
575 reads informally as follows:
578 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
583 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
587 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
588 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
589 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
590 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
593 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
594 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
595 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
596 not the start symbol.
598 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
599 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
600 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
601 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
602 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
603 reports a syntax error.
605 @node Grammar in Bison
606 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
607 @cindex Bison grammar
608 @cindex grammar, Bison
609 @cindex formal grammar
611 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
612 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
613 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
615 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
616 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
617 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
619 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
620 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
621 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
622 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
623 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
624 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
625 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
628 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
629 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
630 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
631 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
633 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
634 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
636 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
637 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
638 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
639 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
643 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
647 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
649 @node Semantic Values
650 @section Semantic Values
651 @cindex semantic value
652 @cindex value, semantic
654 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
655 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
656 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
657 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
658 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
661 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
662 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
663 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
664 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
665 ,Defining Language Semantics},
668 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
669 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
670 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
671 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
674 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
675 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
676 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
677 need to have any semantic value.)
679 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
680 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
681 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
682 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
683 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
684 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
686 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
687 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
688 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
689 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
690 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
692 @node Semantic Actions
693 @section Semantic Actions
694 @cindex semantic actions
695 @cindex actions, semantic
697 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
698 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
699 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
700 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
703 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
704 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
705 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
706 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
707 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
708 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
709 newly recognized larger expression.
711 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
715 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
719 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
720 from the values of the two subexpressions.
723 @section Writing GLR Parsers
725 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
728 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
729 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
731 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
732 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
733 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
734 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
735 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
736 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
737 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
738 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
739 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
741 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
742 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
743 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
744 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
745 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
746 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
747 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
748 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
749 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
750 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
751 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
752 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
753 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
754 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
755 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
756 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
757 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
758 identical set of symbols.
760 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
761 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
762 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
763 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
764 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
765 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
766 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
767 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
768 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
772 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
773 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
774 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
775 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
778 @node Simple GLR Parsers
779 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
780 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
781 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
785 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
786 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
788 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
789 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
790 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
792 Consider a problem that
793 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
794 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
797 type subrange = lo .. hi;
798 type enum = (a, b, c);
802 The original language standard allows only numeric
803 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
804 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
805 10206) and many other
806 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
807 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
811 type subrange = (a) .. b;
815 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
816 type with only one value:
823 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
824 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
826 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
827 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
828 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
829 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
830 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
831 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
832 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
833 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
835 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
836 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
837 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
838 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
841 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
842 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
843 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
844 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
845 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
846 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
849 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
850 use the GLR algorithm.
851 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
852 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
853 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
854 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
855 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
856 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
857 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
858 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
859 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
861 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
862 reports a syntax error as usual.
864 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
865 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
866 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
867 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
868 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
870 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
871 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
872 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
873 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
874 The present example contains only one conflict between two
875 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
876 cannot be nested. So the number of
877 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
878 and the parsing time is still linear.
880 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
881 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
884 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
894 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
923 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
924 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
925 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
926 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
933 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
934 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
935 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
944 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
945 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
946 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
947 notice when the parser splits.
949 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
950 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
951 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
952 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
953 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
954 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
955 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
956 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
957 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
958 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
959 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
960 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
961 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
964 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
965 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
966 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
967 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
968 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
969 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
971 @node Merging GLR Parses
972 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
973 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
974 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
978 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
980 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
985 #define YYSTYPE char const *
987 void yyerror (char const *);
1001 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1010 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1011 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1012 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1013 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1014 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1018 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1019 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1020 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1021 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1025 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1026 | '(' declarator ')'
1031 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1032 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1039 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1040 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1041 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1042 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1043 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1044 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1045 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1046 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1047 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1048 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1049 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1050 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1051 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1052 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1054 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1055 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1056 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1057 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1058 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1059 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1060 The parser therefore prints
1063 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1066 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1067 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1074 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1075 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1076 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1077 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1078 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1079 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1080 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1081 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1082 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1083 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1089 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1090 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1091 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1092 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1097 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1098 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1103 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1107 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1115 with an accompanying forward declaration
1116 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1120 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1121 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1126 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1127 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1130 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1133 Bison requires that all of the
1134 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1135 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1136 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1137 the offending merge.
1139 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1140 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1142 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1143 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1144 the associated reduction.
1145 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1146 action in a GLR parser.
1149 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1151 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1153 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1154 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1155 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1156 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1157 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1158 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1159 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1160 influence syntax analysis.
1161 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1164 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1165 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1166 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1167 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1168 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1169 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1170 future versions of Bison.
1171 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1172 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1173 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1176 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1177 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1178 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1179 initiate error recovery.
1180 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1181 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1182 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1183 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1185 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1186 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1188 @node Compiler Requirements
1189 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1190 @cindex @code{inline}
1191 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1193 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1194 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1195 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1196 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1197 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1198 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1207 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1211 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1212 && ! defined inline)
1221 @cindex textual location
1222 @cindex location, textual
1224 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1225 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1226 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1227 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1229 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1230 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1231 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1232 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1235 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1236 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1237 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1240 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1241 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1242 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1243 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1244 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1245 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1246 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1249 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1250 @cindex Bison parser
1251 @cindex Bison utility
1252 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1255 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1256 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1257 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1258 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1259 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1260 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1261 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1264 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1265 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1266 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1269 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1270 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1271 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1272 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1273 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1274 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1275 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1277 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1278 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1279 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1280 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1281 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1282 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1283 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1284 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1285 C-Language Interface}.
1287 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1288 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1289 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1290 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1291 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1292 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1293 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1294 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1295 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1296 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1297 anything other than their usual meanings.
1299 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1300 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1301 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1302 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1303 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1304 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1305 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1306 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1307 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1310 @section Stages in Using Bison
1311 @cindex stages in using Bison
1314 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1315 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1319 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1320 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1321 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1322 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1323 sequence of C statements.
1326 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1327 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1328 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1329 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1332 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1335 Write error-reporting routines.
1338 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1339 must follow these steps:
1343 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1346 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1349 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1352 @node Grammar Layout
1353 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1354 @cindex grammar file
1356 @cindex format of grammar file
1357 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1359 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1360 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1367 @var{Bison declarations}
1376 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1377 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1379 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1380 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1381 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1382 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1383 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1384 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1386 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1387 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1388 semantic values of various symbols.
1390 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1393 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1394 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1395 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1399 @cindex simple examples
1400 @cindex examples, simple
1402 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1403 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1404 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1405 and a multi-function calculator. All
1406 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1408 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1409 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1410 source file to try them.
1413 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1414 a first example with no operator precedence.
1415 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1416 Operator precedence is introduced.
1417 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1418 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1419 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1420 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1421 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1425 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1426 @cindex reverse polish notation
1427 @cindex polish notation calculator
1428 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1429 @cindex calculator, simple
1431 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1432 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1433 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1434 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1436 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1437 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1440 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1441 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1442 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1443 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1444 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1445 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1446 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1449 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1450 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1452 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1453 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1456 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1459 #define YYSTYPE double
1462 void yyerror (char const *);
1467 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1470 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1471 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1473 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1474 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1475 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1476 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1477 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1478 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1479 which is a floating point number.
1481 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1482 function @code{pow}.
1484 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1485 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1486 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1487 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1490 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1491 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1492 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1493 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1494 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1495 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1496 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1497 type for numeric constants.
1500 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1502 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1515 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1522 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1523 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1524 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1525 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1526 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1527 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1533 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1534 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1535 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1536 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1537 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1540 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1541 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1542 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1544 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1545 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1546 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1547 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1548 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1549 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1558 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1560 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1569 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1570 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1571 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1572 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1573 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1575 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1576 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1577 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1578 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1579 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1580 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1582 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1583 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1584 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1585 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1588 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1589 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1590 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1593 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1595 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1600 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1604 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1605 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1606 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1607 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1608 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1609 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1610 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1612 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1613 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1614 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1615 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1616 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1619 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1621 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1622 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1623 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1624 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1629 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1630 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1635 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1636 equally well have written them separately:
1640 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1641 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1645 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1646 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1647 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1648 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1649 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1650 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1651 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1652 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1654 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1655 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1656 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1658 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1659 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1663 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1667 means the same thing as this:
1672 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1678 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1681 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1682 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1683 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1685 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1686 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1687 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1688 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1690 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1692 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1693 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1694 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1695 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1697 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1698 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1699 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1700 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1701 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1702 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1703 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1704 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1705 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1707 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1708 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1709 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1710 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1711 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1713 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1714 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1716 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1720 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1721 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1722 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1723 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1734 /* Skip white space. */
1735 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1739 /* Process numbers. */
1740 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1743 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1748 /* Return end-of-input. */
1751 /* Return a single char. */
1758 @subsection The Controlling Function
1759 @cindex controlling function
1760 @cindex main function in simple example
1762 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1763 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1764 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1777 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1778 @cindex error reporting routine
1780 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1781 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1782 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1783 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1784 here is the definition we will use:
1792 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1794 yyerror (char const *s)
1796 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1801 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1802 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1803 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1804 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1805 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1806 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1808 @node Rpcalc Generate
1809 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1810 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1812 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1813 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1814 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1815 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1816 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1817 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1819 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1820 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1822 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1823 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1830 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1831 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1832 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1833 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1834 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1835 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1836 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1838 @node Rpcalc Compile
1839 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1840 @cindex compiling the parser
1842 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1846 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1848 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1852 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1853 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1854 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1858 # @r{List files again.}
1860 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1864 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1865 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1871 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1873 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1877 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1879 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1884 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1885 @cindex infix notation calculator
1887 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1889 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1890 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1891 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1892 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1895 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1899 #define YYSTYPE double
1903 void yyerror (char const *);
1908 /* Bison declarations. */
1912 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1913 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1916 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1927 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1934 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1935 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1936 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1937 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1938 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1939 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1940 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1947 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1950 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1952 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1953 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1954 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1955 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1956 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1957 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1960 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1961 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1962 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1963 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1964 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1967 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1968 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1969 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1970 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1971 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1973 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1978 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1986 @node Simple Error Recovery
1987 @section Simple Error Recovery
1988 @cindex error recovery, simple
1990 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1991 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1992 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1993 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1994 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1995 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1997 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1998 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1999 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2005 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2006 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2011 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2012 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2013 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2014 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2015 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2016 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2017 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2018 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2021 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2022 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2023 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2024 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2025 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2026 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2029 @node Location Tracking Calc
2030 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2031 @cindex location tracking calculator
2032 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2033 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2035 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2036 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2037 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2038 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2042 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2043 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2044 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2047 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2048 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2050 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2051 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2054 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2060 void yyerror (char const *);
2063 /* Bison declarations. */
2071 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2075 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2076 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2077 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2078 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2079 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2080 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2081 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2085 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2087 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2088 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2089 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2090 from the new information.
2092 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2093 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2106 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2113 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2114 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2115 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2125 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2126 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2127 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2132 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2133 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2134 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2138 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2139 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2140 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2142 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2143 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2144 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2145 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2146 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2147 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2151 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2153 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2154 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2155 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2158 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2159 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2170 /* Skip white space. */
2171 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2172 ++yylloc.last_column;
2177 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2178 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2182 /* Process numbers. */
2186 ++yylloc.last_column;
2187 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2189 ++yylloc.last_column;
2190 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2197 /* Return end-of-input. */
2202 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2206 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2209 ++yylloc.last_column;
2215 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2216 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2217 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2218 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2220 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2221 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2222 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2223 controlling function:
2230 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2231 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2237 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2238 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2239 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2241 @node Multi-function Calc
2242 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2243 @cindex multi-function calculator
2244 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2245 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2247 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2248 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2249 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2250 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2251 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2253 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2254 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2255 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2256 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2257 functions whose syntax has this form:
2260 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2264 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2265 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2266 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2270 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2274 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2280 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2285 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2288 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2289 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2290 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2293 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2294 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2296 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2298 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2302 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2303 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2305 void yyerror (char const *);
2311 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2312 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2315 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2316 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2323 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2324 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2328 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2329 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2330 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2332 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2333 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2334 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2335 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2337 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2338 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2339 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2340 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2341 between angle brackets).
2343 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2344 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2345 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2346 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2347 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2348 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2351 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2353 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2354 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2355 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2357 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2359 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2370 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2371 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2378 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2379 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2380 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2381 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2382 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2383 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2384 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2385 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2386 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2387 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2390 /* End of grammar. */
2394 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2395 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2396 @cindex symbol table example
2398 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2399 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2400 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2401 requires some additional C functions for support.
2403 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2404 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2405 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2407 @comment file: calc.h
2410 /* Function type. */
2411 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2415 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2418 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2419 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2422 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2423 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2425 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2430 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2432 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2433 extern symrec *sym_table;
2435 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2436 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2440 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2441 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2442 @code{init_table} as well:
2444 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2449 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2451 yyerror (char const *s)
2461 double (*fnct) (double);
2466 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2479 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2484 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2489 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2491 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2492 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2507 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2508 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2510 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2511 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2512 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2513 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2514 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2515 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2517 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2519 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2520 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2524 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2526 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2527 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2528 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2529 ptr->type = sym_type;
2530 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2531 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2539 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2542 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2543 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2544 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2551 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2552 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2553 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2554 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2556 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2557 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2558 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2559 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2560 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2561 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2563 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2564 operators in @code{yylex}.
2566 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2578 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2579 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2587 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2588 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2591 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2597 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2600 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2601 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2602 static size_t length = 40;
2603 static char *symbuf = 0;
2609 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2615 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2619 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2621 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2623 /* Get another character. */
2628 while (isalnum (c));
2635 s = getsym (symbuf);
2637 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2642 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2648 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2649 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2650 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2652 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2655 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2657 yyerror (char const *s)
2659 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2665 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2668 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2669 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2670 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2678 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2679 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2680 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2688 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2691 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2692 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2693 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2696 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2697 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2701 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2703 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2704 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2706 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2707 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2710 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2711 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2712 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2713 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2714 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2715 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2716 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2717 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2718 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2721 @node Grammar Outline
2722 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2724 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2725 appropriate delimiters:
2732 @var{Bison declarations}
2741 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2742 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2743 continues until end of line.
2746 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2747 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2748 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2749 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2750 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2754 @subsection The prologue
2755 @cindex declarations section
2757 @cindex declarations
2759 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2760 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2761 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2762 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2763 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2764 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2765 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2767 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2768 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2771 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2772 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2773 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2774 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2775 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2776 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2777 @code{%union} declaration.
2788 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2792 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2793 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2799 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2800 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2801 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2802 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2803 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2804 @code{#include} directives.
2806 @node Prologue Alternatives
2807 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2808 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2811 @findex %code requires
2812 @findex %code provides
2815 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2816 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2817 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2818 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2819 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2820 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2821 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2823 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2834 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2838 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2839 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2846 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2847 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2848 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2849 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2850 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2851 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2852 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2853 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2854 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2855 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2856 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2858 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2859 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2860 This behavior raises a few questions.
2861 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2862 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2863 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2864 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2865 This behavior is not intuitive.
2867 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2868 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2869 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2870 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2877 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2878 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2881 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2882 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2894 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2898 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2899 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2900 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2907 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2908 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2909 explicit which kind you intend.
2910 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2912 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2913 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2914 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2915 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2916 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2917 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2918 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2919 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2920 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2923 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2924 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2926 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2944 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2950 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2951 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2964 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2965 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2966 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2974 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2975 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2976 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2977 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2978 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2979 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2981 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2982 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2983 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2984 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2985 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2986 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2987 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2988 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2989 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2990 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2991 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2994 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2995 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2996 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2997 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2998 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2999 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3000 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3001 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3002 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3003 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3021 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3027 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3028 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3041 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3047 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3048 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3056 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3057 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3058 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3061 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3062 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3063 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3064 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3065 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3066 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3069 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3070 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3071 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3072 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3074 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3075 organize your grammar file.
3076 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3081 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3082 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3083 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3084 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3088 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3089 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3090 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3091 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3096 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3097 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3099 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3101 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3102 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3103 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3104 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3106 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3107 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3108 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3109 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3110 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3111 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3112 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3113 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3116 @node Bison Declarations
3117 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3118 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3119 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3121 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3122 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3123 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3124 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3127 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3128 @cindex grammar rules section
3129 @cindex rules section for grammar
3131 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3132 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3134 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3135 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3136 if it is the first thing in the file.
3139 @subsection The epilogue
3140 @cindex additional C code section
3142 @cindex C code, section for additional
3144 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3145 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3146 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3147 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3148 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3149 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3150 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3151 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3152 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3153 C-Language Interface}.
3155 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3156 from the grammar rules.
3158 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3159 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3160 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3161 of the grammar file.
3164 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3165 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3166 @cindex terminal symbol
3170 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3173 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3174 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3175 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3176 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3177 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3178 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3179 the symbol to stand for it.
3181 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3182 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3183 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3185 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3186 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3187 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3188 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3189 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3190 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3191 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3193 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3197 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3198 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3199 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3200 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3203 @cindex character token
3204 @cindex literal token
3205 @cindex single-character literal
3206 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3207 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3208 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3209 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3210 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3211 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3212 ,Operator Precedence}).
3214 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3215 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3216 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3217 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3218 your program will confuse other readers.
3220 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3221 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3222 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3223 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3224 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3225 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3229 @cindex string token
3230 @cindex literal string token
3231 @cindex multicharacter literal
3232 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3233 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3234 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3235 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3236 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3238 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3239 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3240 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3241 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3242 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3244 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3246 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3247 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3248 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3249 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3250 read your program will be confused.
3252 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3253 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3254 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3255 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3256 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3257 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3260 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3261 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3262 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3264 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3265 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3266 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3267 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3268 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3269 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3270 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3271 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3272 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3273 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3274 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3275 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3277 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3278 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3279 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3280 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3281 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3283 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3284 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3285 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3286 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3287 characters in the following C-language string:
3290 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3293 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3294 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3295 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3296 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3297 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3298 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3299 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3300 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3301 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3302 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3305 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3306 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3307 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3308 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3309 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3312 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3314 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3315 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3317 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3321 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3326 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3327 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3328 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3339 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3340 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3342 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3343 extra white space as you wish.
3345 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3346 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3349 @{@var{C statements}@}
3354 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3355 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3356 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3357 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3358 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3359 compiler can check it.
3361 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3362 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3363 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3364 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3365 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3366 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3367 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3368 character constants.
3370 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3374 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3375 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3380 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3381 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3388 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3390 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3391 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3392 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3411 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3415 @section Recursive Rules
3416 @cindex recursive rule
3418 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3419 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3420 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3421 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3422 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3433 @cindex left recursion
3434 @cindex right recursion
3436 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3437 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3438 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3450 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3451 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3452 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3453 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3454 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3455 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3456 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3459 @cindex mutual recursion
3460 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3461 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3462 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3471 | primary '+' primary
3484 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3488 @section Defining Language Semantics
3489 @cindex defining language semantics
3490 @cindex language semantics, defining
3492 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3493 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3494 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3496 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3497 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3498 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3499 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3502 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3503 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3504 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3505 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3506 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3507 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3508 action in the middle of a rule.
3512 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3513 @cindex semantic value type
3514 @cindex value type, semantic
3515 @cindex data types of semantic values
3516 @cindex default data type
3518 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3519 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3520 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3521 Notation Calculator}).
3523 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3524 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3525 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3528 #define YYSTYPE double
3532 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3533 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3534 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3535 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3537 @node Multiple Types
3538 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3540 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3541 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3542 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3543 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3546 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3547 requires you to do two things:
3551 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3552 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3553 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3554 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3558 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3559 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3560 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3561 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3562 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3571 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3573 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3574 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3575 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3576 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3578 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3579 placed at any position in the rule;
3580 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3581 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3582 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3583 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3585 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3586 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3587 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3588 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3589 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3590 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3591 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3592 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3593 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3594 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3597 Here is a typical example:
3603 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3607 Or, in terms of named references:
3613 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3618 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3619 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3620 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3621 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3622 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3623 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3625 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3626 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3627 referred to as @code{$2}.
3629 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3630 references construct.
3632 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3633 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3634 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3635 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3636 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3640 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3644 @cindex default action
3645 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3646 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3647 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3648 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3649 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3650 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3652 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3653 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3654 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3655 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3656 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3661 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3662 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3668 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3673 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3674 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3675 definition of @code{foo}.
3678 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3679 any, from a semantic action.
3680 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3681 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3684 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3685 @cindex action data types
3686 @cindex data types in actions
3688 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3689 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3691 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3692 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3693 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3694 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3695 in the rule. In this example,
3701 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3706 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3707 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3708 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3709 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3711 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3712 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3713 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3725 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3726 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3728 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3729 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3730 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3731 @cindex mid-rule actions
3733 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3734 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3735 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3737 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3738 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3739 it is run before they are parsed.
3741 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3742 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3743 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3744 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3747 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3748 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3749 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3750 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3751 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3752 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3754 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3755 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3756 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3757 at the end of the rule.
3759 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3760 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3761 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3762 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3763 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3764 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3770 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3772 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3777 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3778 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3779 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3780 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3781 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3782 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3783 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3784 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3786 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3787 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3788 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3789 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3790 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3793 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3794 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3795 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3796 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3797 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3799 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3800 Discarded Symbols}).
3801 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3802 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3804 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3805 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3810 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3824 $$ = push_context ();
3825 declare_variable ($3);
3832 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3833 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3834 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3836 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3837 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3838 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3839 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3840 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3846 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3847 | '@{' statements '@}'
3853 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3858 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3859 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3862 | '@{' statements '@}'
3868 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3869 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3870 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3871 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3872 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3873 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3875 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3876 actions into the two rules, like this:
3881 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3882 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3883 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3884 '@{' statements '@}'
3890 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3891 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3893 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3894 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3895 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3900 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3901 declarations statements '@}'
3902 | '@{' statements '@}'
3908 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3909 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3911 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3912 serves as a subroutine:
3917 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3923 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3924 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3930 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3931 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3933 @node Tracking Locations
3934 @section Tracking Locations
3936 @cindex textual location
3937 @cindex location, textual
3939 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3940 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3941 especially symbol locations.
3943 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3944 actions to take when rules are matched.
3947 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3948 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3949 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3953 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3954 @cindex data type of locations
3955 @cindex default location type
3957 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3958 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3960 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3961 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3962 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3963 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3967 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3976 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3977 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3978 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3979 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3980 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3982 @node Actions and Locations
3983 @subsection Actions and Locations
3984 @cindex location actions
3985 @cindex actions, location
3988 @vindex @@@var{name}
3989 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3991 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3992 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3994 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3995 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3996 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3997 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3998 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4001 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4002 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4003 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4004 references construct.
4006 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4014 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4015 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4016 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4017 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4024 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4025 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4026 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4032 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4033 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4034 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4037 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4038 example above simply rewrites this way:
4052 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4053 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4054 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4061 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4062 from a semantic action.
4063 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4064 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4066 @node Location Default Action
4067 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4068 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4069 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4071 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4072 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4073 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4074 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4075 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4076 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4077 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4078 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4081 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4082 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4084 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4085 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4086 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4087 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4088 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4089 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4090 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4091 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4092 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4093 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4095 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4099 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4103 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4104 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4105 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4106 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4110 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4111 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4112 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4113 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4120 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4121 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4122 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4124 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4128 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4129 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4132 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4133 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4134 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4135 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4138 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4139 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4140 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4141 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4144 @node Named References
4145 @section Named References
4146 @cindex named references
4148 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4149 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4150 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4151 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4152 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4153 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4155 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4156 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4157 used as named references. For example:
4161 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4162 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4167 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4171 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4172 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4177 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4183 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4186 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4189 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4194 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4195 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4196 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4199 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4200 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4205 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4206 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4207 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4210 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4211 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4217 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4218 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4221 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4222 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4226 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4227 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4228 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4229 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4230 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4231 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4232 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4234 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4238 @section Bison Declarations
4239 @cindex declarations, Bison
4240 @cindex Bison declarations
4242 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4243 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4246 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4247 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4248 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4249 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4251 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4252 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4253 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4254 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4257 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4258 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4259 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4260 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4261 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4262 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4263 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4264 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4265 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4266 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4267 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4268 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4269 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4270 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4271 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4275 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4276 @cindex version requirement
4277 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4280 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4281 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4285 %require "@var{version}"
4289 @subsection Token Type Names
4290 @cindex declaring token type names
4291 @cindex token type names, declaring
4292 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4295 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4301 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4302 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4303 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4305 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4306 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4307 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4310 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4311 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4312 following the token name:
4316 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4320 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4321 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4322 with each other or with normal characters.
4324 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4325 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4326 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4327 Than One Value Type}).
4333 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4337 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4341 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4342 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4343 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4350 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4351 equivalent literal string tokens:
4354 %token <operator> OR "||"
4355 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4360 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4361 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4362 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4363 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4364 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4365 the literal string instead of the token name.
4367 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4368 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4372 %token END 0 "end of file"
4375 @node Precedence Decl
4376 @subsection Operator Precedence
4377 @cindex precedence declarations
4378 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4379 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4381 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4382 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4383 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4384 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4385 operator precedence.
4387 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4388 @code{%token}: either
4391 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4398 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4401 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4402 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4403 all the @var{symbols}:
4407 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4408 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4409 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4410 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4411 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4412 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4413 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4414 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4415 considered a syntax error.
4418 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4419 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4420 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4421 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4422 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4425 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4426 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4427 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4428 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4433 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4434 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4438 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4439 @cindex declaring value types
4440 @cindex value types, declaring
4443 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4444 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4445 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4460 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4461 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4462 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4463 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4465 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4466 @code{union}. For example:
4478 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4479 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4482 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4483 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4484 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4486 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4487 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4489 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4490 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4491 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4492 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4500 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4505 and then your grammar can use the following
4506 instead of @code{%union}:
4519 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4520 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4521 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4525 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4526 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4527 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4530 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4534 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4535 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4536 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4537 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4538 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4541 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4542 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4543 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4544 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4546 @node Initial Action Decl
4547 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4548 @findex %initial-action
4550 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4551 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4554 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4555 @findex %initial-action
4556 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4557 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4558 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4559 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4562 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4565 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4568 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4573 @node Destructor Decl
4574 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4575 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4579 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4580 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4581 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4582 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4583 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4584 must discard the start symbol.
4586 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4587 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4588 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4589 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4591 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4592 symbol is automatically discarded.
4594 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4596 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4597 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4598 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4599 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4600 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4603 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4604 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4605 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4606 tag among @var{symbols}.
4607 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4608 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4609 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4611 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4612 (These default forms are experimental.
4613 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4615 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4616 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4617 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4618 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4620 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4621 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4622 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4623 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4624 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4631 %union @{ char *string; @}
4632 %token <string> STRING1
4633 %token <string> STRING2
4634 %type <string> string1
4635 %type <string> string2
4636 %union @{ char character; @}
4637 %token <character> CHR
4638 %type <character> chr
4641 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4642 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4643 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4644 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4648 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4649 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4650 to @code{free} by default.
4651 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4652 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4653 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4654 @code{free} only once.
4655 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4656 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4658 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4659 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4660 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4661 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4662 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4663 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4664 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4665 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4666 reference it in your grammar.
4667 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4668 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4674 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4675 @cindex mid-rule actions
4676 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4677 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4678 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4679 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4680 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4681 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4682 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4683 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4687 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4688 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4689 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4694 @cindex discarded symbols
4695 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4699 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4701 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4703 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4704 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4706 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4707 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4710 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4713 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4714 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4717 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4718 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4719 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4723 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4724 @cindex printing semantic values
4728 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4729 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4730 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4731 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4733 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4734 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4735 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4737 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4740 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4741 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4742 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4743 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4744 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4745 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4746 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4749 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4750 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4751 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4752 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4760 %union @{ char *string; @}
4761 %token <string> STRING1
4762 %token <string> STRING2
4763 %type <string> string1
4764 %type <string> string2
4765 %union @{ char character; @}
4766 %token <character> CHR
4767 %type <character> chr
4770 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4771 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4772 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4773 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4777 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4778 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4779 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4780 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4781 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4782 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4783 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4787 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4788 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4789 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4790 @cindex warnings, preventing
4791 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4795 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4796 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4797 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4798 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4799 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4800 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4802 The declaration looks like this:
4808 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4809 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4810 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4811 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4813 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4814 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4815 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4816 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4817 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4818 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4819 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4825 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4829 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4830 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4831 print the number of conflicts.
4834 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4835 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4836 go back to the beginning.
4839 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4840 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4841 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4844 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4845 but will keep silent otherwise.
4848 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4849 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4850 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4851 @cindex default start symbol
4854 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4855 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4856 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4863 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4864 @cindex reentrant parser
4866 @findex %define api.pure
4868 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4869 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4870 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4871 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4872 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4873 program must be called only within interlocks.
4875 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4876 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4877 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4878 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4879 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4881 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4882 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4883 reentrant. It looks like this:
4889 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4890 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4891 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4892 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4893 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4894 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4895 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4896 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4897 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4899 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4900 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4904 @subsection A Push Parser
4907 @findex %define api.push-pull
4909 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4910 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4912 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4913 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4914 each time a new token is made available.
4916 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4917 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4918 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4919 within a certain time period.
4921 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4922 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4923 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4926 %define api.push-pull push
4929 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4930 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4931 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4932 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4933 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4937 %define api.push-pull push
4940 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4941 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4942 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4943 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4945 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4946 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4947 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4948 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4949 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4950 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4951 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4952 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4956 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4958 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4959 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4960 yypstate_delete (ps);
4963 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4964 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4965 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4966 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4967 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4968 example would thus look like this:
4973 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4976 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4977 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4978 yypstate_delete (ps);
4981 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4982 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4984 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4985 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4986 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4987 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4988 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4989 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4990 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4991 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4992 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4993 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4994 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4995 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4996 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4997 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4998 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4999 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5000 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5004 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5005 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5006 yypstate_delete (ps);
5009 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5010 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5011 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
5014 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5015 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5016 @cindex declaration summary
5017 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5019 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5021 @deffn {Directive} %union
5022 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5023 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5026 @deffn {Directive} %token
5027 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5028 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5031 @deffn {Directive} %right
5032 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5033 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5036 @deffn {Directive} %left
5037 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5038 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5041 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5042 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5043 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5044 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5048 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5049 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5050 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5054 @deffn {Directive} %type
5055 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5056 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5059 @deffn {Directive} %start
5060 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5064 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5065 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5066 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5072 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5075 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5076 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5078 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5079 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5080 @xref{%code Summary}.
5083 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5084 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or
5085 @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}, see
5086 @ref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 if it is
5087 not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
5088 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5091 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5092 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5093 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5094 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5097 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5098 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5099 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5100 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5101 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5103 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5104 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5105 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5106 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5107 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5108 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5109 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5110 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5111 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5112 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5114 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5115 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5116 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5118 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5119 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5120 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5122 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5123 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5124 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5125 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5126 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5128 @findex %code requires
5129 @findex %code provides
5130 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5131 header also contains their code.
5132 @xref{%code Summary}.
5134 @cindex Header guard
5135 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5136 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5137 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5138 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5139 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5142 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5143 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5145 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5146 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5148 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5152 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5153 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5156 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5157 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5158 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5161 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5162 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5163 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5166 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5167 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5168 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5169 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5171 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5175 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5176 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5177 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5178 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5179 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5180 accurate syntax error messages.
5184 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5185 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5186 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5191 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5192 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5193 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5194 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5195 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5196 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5197 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5201 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5202 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5205 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5206 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5207 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5211 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5212 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5213 Require a Version of Bison}.
5216 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5217 Specify the skeleton to use.
5219 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5220 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5221 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5222 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5224 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5225 file in the Bison installation directory.
5226 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5227 directory of the grammar file.
5228 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5231 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5232 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5233 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5234 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5235 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5236 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5237 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5240 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5241 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5242 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5243 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5244 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5245 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5246 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5249 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5250 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5251 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5255 The highest token number, plus one.
5257 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5259 The number of grammar rules,
5261 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5265 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5266 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5267 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5268 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5272 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5273 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5274 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5278 @node %define Summary
5279 @subsection %define Summary
5281 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5282 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5283 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5284 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5285 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5286 @code{%define} directive:
5288 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5289 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5290 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5291 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5293 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5294 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5295 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5296 to specifying @code{""}.
5298 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5299 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5300 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5303 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5304 @code{%define} accepts.
5306 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5307 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5311 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5313 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5314 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5316 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5318 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5319 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5322 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5323 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5324 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5325 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5326 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5327 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5330 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5331 @item @code{api.location.type}
5332 @findex %define api.location.type
5335 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5337 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5338 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5340 @item Accepted Values: String
5342 @item Default Value: none
5344 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5347 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5348 @item @code{api.prefix}
5349 @findex %define api.prefix
5352 @item Language(s): All
5354 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5355 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5357 @item Accepted Values: String
5359 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5361 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5364 @c ================================================== api.pure
5365 @item @code{api.pure}
5366 @findex %define api.pure
5369 @item Language(s): C
5371 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5372 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5374 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5376 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5379 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5381 @item @code{api.push-pull}
5382 @findex %define api.push-pull
5385 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5387 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5388 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5389 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5390 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5392 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5394 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5397 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5399 @item @code{lr.default-reductions}
5400 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5403 @item Language(s): all
5405 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5406 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5407 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5408 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5410 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5411 @item Default Value:
5413 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5414 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5418 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5420 @item @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states}
5421 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5424 @item Language(s): all
5425 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5426 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5427 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5428 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5431 @c ================================================== lr.type
5433 @item @code{lr.type}
5434 @findex %define lr.type
5437 @item Language(s): all
5439 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5440 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5441 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5443 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5445 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5448 @c ================================================== namespace
5450 @item @code{namespace}
5451 @findex %define namespace
5454 @item Languages(s): C++
5456 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5457 For example, if you specify:
5460 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5463 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5466 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5469 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5470 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5473 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5479 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5480 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5481 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5483 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5485 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5486 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5487 lexical analyzer function.
5488 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5489 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5490 lexical analyzer function.
5491 For example, if you specify:
5494 %define namespace "foo"
5495 %name-prefix "bar::"
5498 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5502 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5503 @item @code{parse.lac}
5504 @findex %define parse.lac
5507 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5509 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5510 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5511 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5512 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5518 @subsection %code Summary
5522 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5523 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5524 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5525 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5526 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5527 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5528 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5529 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5531 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5532 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5533 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5534 in the parser implementation.
5536 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5537 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5538 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5540 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5543 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5544 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5545 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5546 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5547 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5548 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5552 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5553 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5554 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5557 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5558 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5562 @findex %code requires
5565 @item Language(s): C, C++
5567 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5568 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5569 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5570 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5571 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5573 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5574 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5579 @findex %code provides
5582 @item Language(s): C, C++
5584 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5585 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5587 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5588 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5596 @item Language(s): C, C++
5598 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5599 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5600 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5601 parser implementation file. For example:
5610 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5614 @findex %code imports
5617 @item Language(s): Java
5619 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5621 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5622 before any class definitions.
5626 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5627 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5628 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5629 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5632 @node Multiple Parsers
5633 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5635 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5636 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5637 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5638 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5639 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5640 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5641 exported in the generated header.
5643 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5644 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5645 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5646 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5647 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5648 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5649 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5650 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5651 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5653 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5654 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5655 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5656 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5657 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5658 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5659 specifically --- more about this below.
5661 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5662 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5665 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5666 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5667 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5668 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5671 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5672 #define yyparse cparse
5673 #define yylval clval
5679 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5680 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5681 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5683 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5687 extern CSTYPE clval;
5691 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5692 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5693 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5696 /* Enabling traces. */
5698 # if defined YYDEBUG
5715 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5716 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5717 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5720 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5721 @cindex C-language interface
5724 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5725 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5726 functions that it needs to use.
5728 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5729 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5730 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5731 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5734 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5735 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5736 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5737 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5738 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5739 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5741 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5742 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5743 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5747 @node Parser Function
5748 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5751 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5752 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5753 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5754 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5755 without reading further.
5758 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5759 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5760 is due to end-of-input).
5762 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5763 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5766 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5769 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5774 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5779 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5782 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5783 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5784 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5786 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5787 @findex %parse-param
5788 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5789 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5790 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5791 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5792 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5795 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5798 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5799 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5803 Then call the parser like this:
5807 int nastiness, randomness;
5808 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5809 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5815 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5818 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5821 @node Push Parser Function
5822 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5823 @findex yypush_parse
5825 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5826 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5828 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5829 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5830 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5831 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5833 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5834 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
5835 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
5836 required to finish parsing the grammar.
5839 @node Pull Parser Function
5840 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5841 @findex yypull_parse
5843 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5844 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5846 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5847 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5848 declaration is used.
5849 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5851 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5852 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5855 @node Parser Create Function
5856 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5857 @findex yypstate_new
5859 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5860 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5862 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5863 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5864 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5865 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5867 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
5868 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5869 or 0 if no memory was available.
5870 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5874 @node Parser Delete Function
5875 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5876 @findex yypstate_delete
5878 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5879 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5881 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5882 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5883 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5884 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5886 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5887 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5888 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5892 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5894 @cindex lexical analyzer
5896 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5897 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5898 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5899 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5901 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5902 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5903 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5904 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5905 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5906 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5907 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5911 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5912 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5913 of the token it has read.
5914 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5915 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5917 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5918 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5921 @node Calling Convention
5922 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5924 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5925 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5926 signifies end-of-input.
5928 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5929 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5930 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5931 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5933 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5934 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5935 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5936 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5937 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5938 signifies end-of-input.
5940 Here is an example showing these things:
5947 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5950 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5951 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5953 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5959 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5960 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5962 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5963 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5967 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5968 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5969 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5970 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5973 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5974 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5975 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5976 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5977 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5980 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5981 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5982 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5983 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5986 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5989 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5990 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5991 strlen (token_buffer))
5992 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5993 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5998 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5999 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6003 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6006 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6007 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6008 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6009 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6015 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6016 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6021 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6022 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6023 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6024 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6025 declaration looks like this:
6038 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6043 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6044 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6049 @node Token Locations
6050 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6053 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6054 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6055 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6056 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6057 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6058 data in that variable.
6060 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6061 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6062 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6063 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6064 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6067 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6070 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6072 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
6073 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6074 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6075 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6076 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6077 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6082 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6085 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6086 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6091 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6092 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6093 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6097 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
6098 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6101 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6103 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6104 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6110 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6111 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6112 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6116 results in the following signatures:
6119 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6120 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6123 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
6126 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6127 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6131 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6134 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6135 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6138 @node Error Reporting
6139 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6140 @cindex error reporting function
6143 @cindex syntax error
6145 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6146 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6147 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6148 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6151 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6152 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6153 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6154 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6155 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6157 @findex %error-verbose
6158 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
6159 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6160 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6161 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6162 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6164 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6165 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6166 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6167 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6168 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6169 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6171 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6172 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6173 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6175 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6180 yyerror (char const *s)
6184 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6189 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6190 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6191 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6192 immediately return 1.
6194 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6195 an access to the current location.
6196 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6197 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6198 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6202 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6203 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6206 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6209 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6210 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6213 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6214 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6215 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6216 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6220 /* Location tracking. */
6224 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6226 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6227 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6231 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6234 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6235 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6236 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6237 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6242 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6243 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6244 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6245 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6246 message is always passed last.
6248 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6249 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6250 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6254 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6255 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6256 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6257 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6259 @node Action Features
6260 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6261 @cindex summary, action features
6262 @cindex action features summary
6264 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6265 are useful in actions.
6267 @deffn {Variable} $$
6268 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6269 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6272 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6273 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6274 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6277 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6278 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6279 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6280 Types of Values in Actions}.
6283 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6284 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6285 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6286 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6289 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6290 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6291 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6294 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6295 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6296 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6299 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6301 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6302 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6303 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6304 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6305 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6306 going to be reduced by this rule.
6308 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6309 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6310 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6313 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6316 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6317 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6320 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6321 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6325 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6326 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6327 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6328 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6329 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6330 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6333 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6334 @findex YYRECOVERING
6335 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6336 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6337 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6340 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6341 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6342 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6343 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6344 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6346 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6349 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6350 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6352 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6354 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6357 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6358 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6359 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6360 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6363 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6364 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6365 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6366 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6368 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6371 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6372 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6373 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6374 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6376 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6381 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6382 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6385 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6389 @c int first_line, last_line;
6390 @c int first_column, last_column;
6394 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6395 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6397 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6398 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6399 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6402 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6405 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6407 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6408 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6412 @node Internationalization
6413 @section Parser Internationalization
6414 @cindex internationalization
6420 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6421 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6422 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6423 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6424 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6425 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6426 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6427 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6430 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6431 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6432 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6437 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6438 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6439 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6440 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6441 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6445 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6450 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6451 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6452 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6453 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6454 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6455 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6456 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6457 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6458 Bison-generated parser.
6461 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6462 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6463 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6467 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6470 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6471 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6472 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6476 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6477 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6478 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6481 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6487 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6491 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6497 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6498 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6499 @cindex algorithm of parser
6502 @cindex parser stack
6503 @cindex stack, parser
6505 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6506 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6507 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6509 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6510 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6513 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6514 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6515 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6516 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6517 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6518 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6519 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6521 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6528 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6529 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6532 expr: expr '*' expr;
6536 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6543 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6544 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6546 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6547 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6548 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6550 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6553 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6554 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6555 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6556 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6557 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6558 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6559 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6560 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6561 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6562 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6566 @section Lookahead Tokens
6567 @cindex lookahead token
6569 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6570 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6571 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6572 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6573 token in order to decide what to do.
6575 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6576 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6577 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6578 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6579 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6580 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6581 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6584 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6585 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6586 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6605 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6606 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6607 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6608 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6609 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6611 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6612 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6613 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6614 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6615 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6616 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6621 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6622 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6623 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6624 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6627 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6629 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6630 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6631 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6633 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6634 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6640 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6646 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6647 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6649 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6650 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6651 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6652 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6655 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6656 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6657 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6658 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6659 contrast it with the other alternative.
6661 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6662 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6666 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6668 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6671 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6672 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6673 making these two inputs equivalent:
6676 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6678 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6681 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6682 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6683 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6684 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6685 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6686 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6687 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6688 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6690 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6691 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6692 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6693 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6695 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6697 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6698 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6699 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6704 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6717 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6727 @section Operator Precedence
6728 @cindex operator precedence
6729 @cindex precedence of operators
6731 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6732 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6733 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6734 shift and when to reduce.
6737 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6738 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6739 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6740 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6743 @node Why Precedence
6744 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6746 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6747 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6762 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6763 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6764 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6765 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6766 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6767 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6768 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6771 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6772 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6773 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6774 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6775 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6776 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6777 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6778 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6781 @cindex associativity
6782 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6783 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6784 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6785 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6786 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6787 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6788 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6789 makes right-associativity.
6791 @node Using Precedence
6792 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6797 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6798 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6799 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6800 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6801 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6802 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6803 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6806 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6807 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6808 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6809 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6810 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6812 @node Precedence Examples
6813 @subsection Precedence Examples
6815 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6823 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6824 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6825 declared with @code{'-'}:
6828 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6834 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6835 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6836 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6838 @node How Precedence
6839 @subsection How Precedence Works
6841 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6842 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6843 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6844 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6845 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6846 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6848 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6849 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6850 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6851 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6852 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6853 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6854 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6857 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6858 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6860 @node Contextual Precedence
6861 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6862 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6863 @cindex unary operator precedence
6864 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6865 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6868 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6869 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6870 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6871 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6873 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6874 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6875 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6876 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6879 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6880 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6881 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6882 modifier's syntax is:
6885 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6889 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6890 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6891 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6892 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6893 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6895 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6896 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6897 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6907 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6915 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6920 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6921 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6922 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6923 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6925 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6926 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6927 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6928 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6930 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6931 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6932 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6933 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6934 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6935 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6937 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6938 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6942 @section Parser States
6943 @cindex finite-state machine
6944 @cindex parser state
6945 @cindex state (of parser)
6947 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6948 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6949 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6950 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6951 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6953 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6954 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6955 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6956 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6957 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6958 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6959 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6960 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6963 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6964 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6965 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6968 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6969 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6970 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6972 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6973 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6976 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6977 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6982 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6984 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6990 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6991 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6997 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6998 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6999 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7000 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7001 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7002 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7004 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7005 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7006 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7008 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7009 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7010 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7011 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7012 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7014 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7015 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7016 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7017 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7021 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7022 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7026 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7032 | sequence redirects
7042 | redirects redirect
7047 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7048 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7049 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7050 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7051 in infinitely many ways!
7053 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7054 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7055 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7056 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7058 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7069 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7077 | sequence redirects
7091 | redirects redirect
7096 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7097 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7098 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7100 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7108 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7111 | name_list ':' type
7127 | name ',' name_list
7132 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7133 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7134 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7135 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7139 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7141 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7142 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7143 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7145 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7146 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7147 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7148 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7149 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7150 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7151 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7154 @cindex canonical LR
7155 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7156 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7157 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7158 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7159 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7160 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7161 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7162 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7164 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7165 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7166 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7167 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7168 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7179 | ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
7184 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7185 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7186 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7187 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7188 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7189 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7191 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7192 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7193 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7194 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7195 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7196 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7201 | name_list ':' type
7209 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7210 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7215 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7216 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7217 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7218 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7219 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7220 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7221 sometimes contain incorrect information.
7223 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7224 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7225 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7226 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7228 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7229 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7232 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7233 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7234 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7235 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7238 @node LR Table Construction
7239 @subsection LR Table Construction
7240 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7243 @cindex canonical LR
7244 @findex %define lr.type
7246 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7247 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7248 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7249 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7252 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7253 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7254 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7255 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7258 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7259 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7260 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7263 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7264 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7265 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7268 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7270 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7273 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7277 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7281 %define lr.type ielr
7284 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7285 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7286 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7287 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7288 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7289 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7290 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7291 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7292 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7293 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7295 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7296 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7297 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7298 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7304 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7307 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7309 @cindex GLR with LALR
7310 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7311 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7312 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7313 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7314 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7315 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7316 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7317 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7318 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7319 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7321 @item Malformed grammars.
7323 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7324 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7325 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7326 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7327 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7332 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7333 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7334 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7335 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7336 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7337 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7338 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7339 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7340 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7344 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7347 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7348 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7349 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7350 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7351 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7352 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7353 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7354 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7355 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7356 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7357 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7358 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7361 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7362 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7363 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7365 @node Default Reductions
7366 @subsection Default Reductions
7367 @cindex default reductions
7368 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7371 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7372 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7373 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7374 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7375 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7377 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7378 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7381 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7383 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7384 @cindex consistent states
7385 @cindex defaulted states
7386 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7387 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7388 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7389 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7390 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7391 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7392 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7393 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7394 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7395 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7396 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7398 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7399 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7400 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7401 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7402 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7403 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7404 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7405 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7406 should already be considered closed.
7408 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7410 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7411 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7412 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7413 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7414 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7415 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7416 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7417 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7418 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7422 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7423 @c sentence from being rejected.
7424 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7425 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7426 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7427 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7428 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7429 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7432 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7433 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7434 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7435 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7436 because the accept action ends the parse.
7438 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7439 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7440 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7441 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7442 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7443 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7444 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7445 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7446 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7447 split the parse instead.
7449 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7450 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7452 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7453 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7454 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7456 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7457 @item @code{consistent}
7458 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7461 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7462 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7467 @findex %define parse.lac
7469 @cindex lookahead correction
7471 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7472 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7473 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7474 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7475 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7476 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7477 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7478 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7479 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7481 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7482 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7483 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7484 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7485 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7487 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7488 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7489 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7490 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7492 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7493 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7495 @item @code{none} (default)
7498 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7499 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7503 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7504 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7505 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7506 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7507 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7508 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7509 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7510 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7511 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7512 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7515 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7516 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7517 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7518 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7519 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7520 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7521 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7522 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7523 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7524 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7526 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7527 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7528 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7529 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7530 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7531 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7532 language-recognition power.
7534 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7537 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7539 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7540 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7541 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7542 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7545 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7547 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7548 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7549 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7550 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7551 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7552 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7556 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7557 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7558 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7559 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7560 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7561 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7562 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7563 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7564 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7565 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7566 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7569 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7570 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7571 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7573 @node Unreachable States
7574 @subsection Unreachable States
7575 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7576 @cindex unreachable states
7578 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7579 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7580 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7581 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7583 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7584 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7585 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7586 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7588 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7589 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7590 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7593 There are a few caveats to consider:
7596 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7598 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7599 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7600 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7601 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7602 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7603 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7605 @item Other useless states.
7607 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7608 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7609 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7610 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7611 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7612 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7613 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7616 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7617 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7619 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7620 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7621 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7623 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7624 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7625 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7626 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7627 context-free languages.
7628 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7629 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7630 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7631 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7632 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7633 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7634 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7635 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7637 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7638 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7639 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7640 parser uses the same basic
7641 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7642 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7643 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7644 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7646 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7647 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7648 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7649 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7650 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7652 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7653 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7654 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7655 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7656 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7657 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7658 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7659 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7660 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7661 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7662 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7665 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7666 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7667 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7668 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7669 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7670 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7671 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7672 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7673 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7674 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7675 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7676 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7678 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7679 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7680 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7682 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7683 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7684 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7685 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7686 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7687 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7688 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7689 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7690 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7691 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7692 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7693 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7695 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7698 @node Memory Management
7699 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7700 @cindex memory exhaustion
7701 @cindex memory management
7702 @cindex stack overflow
7703 @cindex parser stack overflow
7704 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7706 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7707 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7708 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7710 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7711 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7712 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7715 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7716 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7717 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7718 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7720 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7721 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7722 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7723 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7724 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7725 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7727 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7728 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7729 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7732 @cindex default stack limit
7733 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7737 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7738 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7739 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7740 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7741 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7743 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7745 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7746 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7747 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7748 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7749 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7750 this deficiency in a future release.
7752 @node Error Recovery
7753 @chapter Error Recovery
7754 @cindex error recovery
7755 @cindex recovery from errors
7757 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7758 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7759 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7762 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7763 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7764 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7765 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7766 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7767 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7768 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7771 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7772 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7773 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7774 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7775 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7776 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7788 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7789 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
7791 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7792 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7793 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7794 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7795 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
7796 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7797 applicable in the ordinary way.
7799 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7800 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7801 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7802 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7803 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
7804 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7805 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7806 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7807 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7808 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7809 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7810 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7812 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7813 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7814 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7817 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7820 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7821 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7822 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7823 spurious error message:
7833 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7834 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7835 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7836 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7837 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7838 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7839 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7842 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7843 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7844 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7845 error messages resume.
7847 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7848 as any other rules can.
7851 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7852 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7853 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7854 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7857 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7858 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7859 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7861 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7863 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7864 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7865 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7866 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7867 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7869 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7870 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7871 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7872 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7875 @node Context Dependency
7876 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7878 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7879 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7880 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7881 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7885 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7886 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7887 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7888 error recovery rules must be written.
7891 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7892 neither clean nor robust.)
7894 @node Semantic Tokens
7895 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7897 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7898 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7904 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7905 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7906 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7908 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7909 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7910 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7911 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7912 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7914 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7915 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7916 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7917 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7918 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7919 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7920 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7922 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7923 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7924 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7925 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7929 typedef int foo, bar;
7933 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7934 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7940 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7941 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7943 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7944 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7945 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7946 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7947 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7952 declarator maybeasm '=' init
7953 | declarator maybeasm
7959 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
7960 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7966 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7967 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7968 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7970 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7971 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7972 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7973 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7974 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7975 the syntactic context.
7977 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7978 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7979 @cindex lexical tie-in
7981 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7982 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7985 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7986 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7987 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7988 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7989 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7996 void yyerror (char const *);
8005 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8006 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8007 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8021 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8022 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8023 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8025 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8026 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8027 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8030 @node Tie-in Recovery
8031 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8033 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8034 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8036 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8037 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8038 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8039 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8044 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8046 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8050 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8051 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8052 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8053 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8054 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8056 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8058 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8059 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8060 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8066 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8072 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8073 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8074 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8075 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8077 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8078 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8079 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8080 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8081 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8082 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8085 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8088 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8090 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8091 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8092 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8093 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8096 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8097 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8098 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8102 @section Understanding Your Parser
8104 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8105 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8106 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8107 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8108 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8110 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8111 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8112 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8113 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8114 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8115 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8116 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8118 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8136 @command{bison} reports:
8139 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8140 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8141 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8142 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8143 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8146 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8147 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8148 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8149 interpretation is the same.
8152 @cindex token, useless
8153 @cindex useless token
8154 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8155 @cindex useless nonterminal
8156 @cindex rule, useless
8157 @cindex useless rule
8158 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8159 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8160 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8161 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8164 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8167 Terminals unused in grammar
8170 Rules useless in grammar
8175 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8178 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8179 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8180 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8181 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8185 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8200 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8204 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8217 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8222 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8228 @cindex pointed rule
8229 @cindex rule, pointed
8230 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8231 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8232 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8233 the location of the input cursor.
8238 0 $accept: . exp $end
8240 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8245 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8246 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8247 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8248 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8249 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8250 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8251 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8252 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8254 @cindex core, item set
8255 @cindex item set core
8256 @cindex kernel, item set
8257 @cindex item set core
8258 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8259 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8260 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8261 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8262 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8263 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8268 0 $accept: . exp $end
8269 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8275 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8281 In the state 1@dots{}
8288 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8292 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8293 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8294 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8295 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8300 0 $accept: exp . $end
8301 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8306 $end shift, and go to state 3
8307 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8308 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8309 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8310 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8314 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8315 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8316 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8317 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8318 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8321 @cindex accepting state
8322 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8328 0 $accept: exp $end .
8334 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8335 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8337 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8343 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8345 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8352 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8354 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8361 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8363 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8370 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8372 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8377 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8383 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8389 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8390 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8392 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8393 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8396 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8397 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8398 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8399 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8400 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8401 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8402 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8403 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8405 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8406 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8407 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8410 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8411 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8412 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8413 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8414 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8415 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8416 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8417 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8418 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8419 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8420 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8421 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8426 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8427 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8432 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8433 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8435 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8436 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8439 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8440 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8441 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8442 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8443 conflicts in the report:
8446 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8447 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8448 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8452 The remaining states are similar:
8458 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8464 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8465 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8467 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8468 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8474 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8480 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8482 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8483 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8489 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8495 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8496 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8497 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8498 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8500 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8501 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8502 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8503 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8504 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8509 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8510 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8511 @samp{*}, but also because the
8512 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8514 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
8517 @section Visualizing Your Parser
8520 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
8521 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
8522 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
8523 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
8524 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
8525 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
8526 to help them understand LR parsers.
8528 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified (see
8529 @pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
8530 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
8531 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
8532 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}.
8534 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8545 The graphical output is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is
8546 easier understood by making direct comparisons between them. See
8547 @ref{Debugging, , Debugging Your Parser} for a detailled analysis of the
8550 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
8552 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
8553 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
8554 about transitions, for examples
8556 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
8557 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
8558 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
8563 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
8566 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
8568 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
8569 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
8577 ";" shift, and go to state 6
8581 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8583 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
8585 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
8587 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
8588 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
8589 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
8590 action for the given state, there is no such label.
8592 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
8599 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
8600 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
8603 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8605 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
8607 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
8608 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
8609 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
8610 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
8611 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
8613 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation state. It
8614 is shown as a blue diamond, labelled "Acc".
8616 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
8618 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
8619 the name of the rule being jumped to.
8621 @c ================================================= Tracing
8624 @section Tracing Your Parser
8627 @cindex tracing the parser
8629 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8630 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8633 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8634 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8635 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8638 @node Enabling Traces
8639 @subsection Enabling Traces
8640 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8643 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8645 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8646 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8647 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8648 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8651 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
8652 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
8653 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
8654 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
8655 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
8657 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
8658 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
8659 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8660 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
8661 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
8663 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8665 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8666 Summary}). This is a Bison extension, especially useful for languages that
8667 don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to you,
8668 this is the preferred solution.
8671 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8675 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8676 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8677 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8678 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8679 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8680 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8682 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8683 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8684 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8685 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8687 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8688 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8689 messages tell you these things:
8693 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8696 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8697 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8700 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8701 of the state stack afterward.
8704 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
8705 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
8706 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8707 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8708 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8709 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8710 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8711 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8712 grammar are to blame.
8714 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
8715 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8716 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8717 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8718 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8721 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
8723 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
8724 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
8725 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
8726 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
8727 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
8728 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
8730 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
8731 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
8732 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
8735 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
8737 /* Generate the parser description file. */
8739 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
8742 /* Formatting semantic values. */
8743 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
8744 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
8745 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
8748 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
8749 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
8750 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
8751 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
8752 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
8753 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
8755 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
8756 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
8757 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
8758 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
8759 printer will be used for them.
8761 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
8762 are sent onto standard error.
8765 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
8768 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
8769 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8775 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
8776 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
8777 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
8778 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
8780 Then the parser calls the scanner.
8782 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
8783 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
8788 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
8789 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
8790 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
8794 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
8795 Shifting token '(' ()
8797 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8798 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8800 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8801 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8802 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8808 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
8809 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
8810 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
8813 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
8814 Shifting token '-' ()
8816 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8817 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8819 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8820 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8821 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8822 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
8824 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
8825 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
8826 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8828 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8829 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8835 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
8836 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
8839 Next token is token ')' ()
8840 Shifting token ')' ()
8842 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
8843 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
8845 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8847 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8853 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
8857 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
8858 Shifting token '\n' ()
8860 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
8861 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8864 -> $$ = nterm line ()
8867 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
8870 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8875 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
8876 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
8877 completion of the parsing.
8880 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
8881 Shifting token $end ()
8884 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
8885 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
8889 @node The YYPRINT Macro
8890 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
8893 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
8894 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
8895 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
8897 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
8899 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
8900 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
8901 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
8903 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
8906 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8907 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8911 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8912 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
8913 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
8916 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8919 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8922 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8923 else if (type == NUM)
8924 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8928 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8931 @chapter Invoking Bison
8932 @cindex invoking Bison
8933 @cindex Bison invocation
8934 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8936 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8942 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8943 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8944 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8945 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8946 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8947 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8948 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8949 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8950 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8951 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8952 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8957 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8960 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8963 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8966 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8968 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8969 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8970 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8973 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8974 in alphabetical order by short options.
8975 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8976 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8980 @section Bison Options
8982 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8983 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8984 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8985 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8986 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8989 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8990 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8993 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8999 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9003 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9005 @item --print-localedir
9006 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9008 @item --print-datadir
9009 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9013 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9014 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9015 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9016 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9017 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9018 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9019 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9020 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9021 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9022 for compatibility with POSIX:
9029 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9030 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9031 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9032 this option is specified.
9034 @item -W [@var{category}]
9035 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9036 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9039 @item midrule-values
9040 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9042 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9045 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9048 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9049 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9052 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9055 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9056 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9057 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9060 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9064 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9065 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9066 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9067 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9068 no effect on the conflict report.
9071 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9073 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9074 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9080 Turn off all the warnings.
9082 Treat warnings as errors.
9085 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9086 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9087 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9096 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9097 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9098 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9100 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9101 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9102 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9103 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9104 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9105 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9106 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9110 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9113 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9114 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9115 definition for @var{name}.
9117 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9118 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9119 definitions for @var{name}.
9121 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9122 definitions for @var{name}.
9125 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9126 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9127 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9129 @item -L @var{language}
9130 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9131 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9132 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9133 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9134 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9136 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9140 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9142 @item -p @var{prefix}
9143 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9144 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9145 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9146 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9150 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9151 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9152 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9153 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9154 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9155 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9158 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9159 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9160 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9162 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9163 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9164 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9165 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9167 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9168 file in the Bison installation directory.
9169 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9170 current working directory.
9171 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9174 @itemx --token-table
9175 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9182 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9183 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9184 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9185 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9188 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9189 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9190 with other short options.
9192 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9193 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9194 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9195 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9197 @item -r @var{things}
9198 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9199 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9200 separated list of @var{things} among:
9204 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9208 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9209 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9212 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9213 each rule's lookahead set.
9216 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9217 precedence and associativity directives.
9220 Enable all the items.
9223 Do not generate the report.
9226 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9227 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9231 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9232 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9233 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9236 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9237 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9239 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9240 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9242 @item -g [@var{file}]
9243 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9244 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9245 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9246 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9247 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9248 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9251 @item -x [@var{file}]
9252 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9253 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9254 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9255 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9257 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9258 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9261 @node Option Cross Key
9262 @section Option Cross Key
9264 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9265 the corresponding short option and directive.
9267 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9268 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9269 @include cross-options.texi
9273 @section Yacc Library
9275 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9276 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9277 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9278 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9279 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9280 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9281 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9283 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9284 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9287 int yyerror (char const *);
9290 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9291 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9292 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9298 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9300 @node Other Languages
9301 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9304 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9305 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9309 @section C++ Parsers
9312 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9313 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9314 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9315 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9316 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9317 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9320 @node C++ Bison Interface
9321 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9322 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9326 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9327 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9328 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9329 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9331 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9333 @findex %define namespace
9334 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
9335 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
9336 generated in the following files:
9341 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9342 location tracking. These files are not generated if the @code{%define}
9343 variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9346 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9349 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9350 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9351 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9352 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9353 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9355 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9356 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9357 @samp{%defines} directive.
9360 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9361 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9363 @node C++ Semantic Values
9364 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9365 @c - No objects in unions
9367 @c - Printer and destructor
9369 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9370 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9371 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
9372 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
9373 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9376 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9377 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9378 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9380 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9381 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9382 to such objects are allowed.
9385 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9386 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9387 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9391 @node C++ Location Values
9392 @subsection C++ Location Values
9396 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9398 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9399 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
9401 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
9402 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9403 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
9404 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
9405 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
9408 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9409 genuine code only the latter is used.
9412 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9413 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9414 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
9418 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9420 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9421 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9422 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9426 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9427 Reset the position to the given values.
9430 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9431 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9432 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9433 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9434 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9437 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9438 The line, starting at 1.
9441 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9442 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9445 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9446 The column, starting at 1.
9449 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9450 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9453 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9454 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9455 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9456 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9457 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9460 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9461 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9462 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9465 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9466 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9467 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9468 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9472 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9474 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9475 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9478 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9479 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9480 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9483 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9484 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9487 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9488 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9489 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9492 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9493 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9494 Advance the @code{end} position.
9497 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9498 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9499 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9500 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9503 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9504 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9507 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9508 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9509 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9513 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9514 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9515 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9518 @node User Defined Location Type
9519 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
9520 @findex %define api.location.type
9522 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
9523 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
9526 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
9529 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
9532 it must be copyable;
9535 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
9536 parser basically runs
9538 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
9539 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
9542 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
9545 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
9546 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
9549 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
9550 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
9555 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
9556 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
9557 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
9558 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
9563 %define namespace "master::"
9567 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
9568 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
9571 %define api.location.type "master::location"
9572 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
9575 @node C++ Parser Interface
9576 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9577 @c - define parser_class_name
9579 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9581 @c - Reporting errors
9583 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9584 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9585 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9586 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9587 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9588 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9589 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9590 additional argument for its constructor.
9592 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9593 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9594 The types for semantics value and locations.
9597 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9598 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9599 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9600 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9601 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9602 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9605 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9606 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9607 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9610 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9611 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9614 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
9615 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
9616 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
9619 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9620 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9621 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9625 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9626 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9627 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9628 or nonzero, full tracing.
9631 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9632 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9633 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9634 described by @var{m}.
9638 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9639 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9640 @c - prefix for yylex.
9641 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9644 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9645 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9646 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9648 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9649 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9650 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9651 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9655 @node A Complete C++ Example
9656 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9658 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9659 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9660 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9661 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9662 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9663 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9664 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
9665 actually easier to interface with.
9668 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9669 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9670 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9671 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9672 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9675 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9676 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9678 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9679 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9680 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9681 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9682 of valid input follows.
9686 seven := one + two * three
9690 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9691 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9693 @c - A place to store error messages
9694 @c - A place for the result
9696 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9697 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9698 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9699 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9700 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9701 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9702 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9704 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9705 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9706 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9709 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9711 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9712 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9715 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9720 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9721 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9722 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9723 factor both as follows.
9725 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9727 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9729 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9730 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9731 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9732 calcxx_driver& driver)
9733 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9738 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9741 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9743 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9748 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9750 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9756 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9757 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9759 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9761 // Handling the scanner.
9764 bool trace_scanning;
9768 Similarly for the parser itself.
9770 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9772 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9773 int parse (const std::string& f);
9779 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9780 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9781 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9782 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9784 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9787 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9788 void error (const std::string& m);
9790 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9793 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9794 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9795 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9796 messages and set error state.
9798 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9800 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9801 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9803 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9804 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9806 variables["one"] = 1;
9807 variables["two"] = 2;
9810 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9815 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9819 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9820 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9821 int res = parser.parse ();
9827 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9829 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9833 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9835 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9840 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9842 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9843 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9844 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9845 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9848 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9850 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9851 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9853 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9857 @findex %code requires
9858 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9859 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9860 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9861 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9862 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9863 use a forward declaration of the driver.
9864 @xref{%code Summary}.
9866 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9870 class calcxx_driver;
9875 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9876 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9879 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9881 // The parsing context.
9882 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9883 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9887 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9888 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9889 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9890 automatically propagated.
9892 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9897 // Initialize the initial location.
9898 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9903 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9904 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9907 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9914 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9917 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9929 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9930 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9932 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9935 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9941 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9942 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9943 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9944 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
9947 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9949 %token END 0 "end of file"
9951 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9952 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
9957 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9960 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9961 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9963 %printer @{ yyoutput << *$$; @} "identifier"
9964 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9966 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <ival>
9970 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9972 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9976 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9980 | assignments assignment @{@};
9983 "identifier" ":=" exp
9984 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9988 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9989 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9990 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9991 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9992 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9993 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9998 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10001 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10004 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
10005 const std::string& m)
10007 driver.error (l, m);
10011 @node Calc++ Scanner
10012 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10014 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10015 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10017 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10019 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10020 # include <cstdlib>
10022 # include <climits>
10024 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10025 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10027 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10028 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10029 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10030 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
10032 # define yywrap() 1
10034 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
10035 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
10036 not of token_type. */
10037 #define yyterminate() return token::END
10042 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10043 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10044 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10045 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
10047 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10049 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10053 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10055 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10057 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10063 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10064 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10065 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
10066 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
10067 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10068 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10069 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10071 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10075 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
10082 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
10083 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
10087 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
10088 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
10089 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
10090 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
10092 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10095 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
10097 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
10098 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
10099 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
10102 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10103 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10104 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
10106 return token::NUMBER;
10108 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
10109 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
10114 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
10115 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10117 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10121 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10123 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10124 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10126 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10128 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10129 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10136 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10143 @node Calc++ Top Level
10144 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10146 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10148 @comment file: calc++.cc
10150 #include <iostream>
10151 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10155 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10157 calcxx_driver driver;
10158 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10159 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10160 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10161 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10162 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10163 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10164 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10170 @section Java Parsers
10173 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10174 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10175 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10176 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10177 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10178 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10179 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10180 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10183 @node Java Bison Interface
10184 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10185 @c - %language "Java"
10187 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10188 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10190 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10191 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10193 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10194 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10195 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10196 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10197 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10198 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10199 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10200 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10201 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10202 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10204 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10206 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10207 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10208 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10209 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10212 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10213 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10215 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10216 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10218 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10219 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10221 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10222 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
10223 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
10224 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10225 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10226 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
10227 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
10228 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10229 access the token names and codes.
10231 @node Java Semantic Values
10232 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10233 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10235 @c - Printer and destructor
10237 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10238 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10239 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10242 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10243 %type <Integer> number
10246 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10247 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10248 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10249 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
10250 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10253 %define stype "ASTNode"
10257 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10258 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10260 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10261 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10262 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10263 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10264 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10265 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10267 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10268 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10269 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10271 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10272 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10273 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10276 @node Java Location Values
10277 @subsection Java Location Values
10279 @c - class Position
10280 @c - class Location
10282 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10283 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10284 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10285 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10286 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10287 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10288 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
10290 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10291 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10292 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10293 be supplied by the user.
10296 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10297 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10298 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10301 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10302 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10305 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10306 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10309 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10310 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10311 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10312 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10316 @node Java Parser Interface
10317 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10318 @c - define parser_class_name
10320 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10322 @c - Reporting errors
10324 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10325 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10326 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10327 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10328 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10330 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10331 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10332 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10333 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10334 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10335 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10337 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10338 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10339 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10340 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
10342 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10343 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10344 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10345 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10346 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10347 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10349 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
10350 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
10352 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10353 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10354 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10355 which initialize them automatically.
10357 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
10358 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
10360 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10361 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10362 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
10366 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10367 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10368 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
10370 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10371 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10372 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
10375 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10376 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10377 @code{false} otherwise.
10380 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10381 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10382 from a syntax error.
10383 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10386 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10387 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10388 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10392 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10393 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10394 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10395 or nonzero, full tracing.
10399 @node Java Scanner Interface
10400 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10403 @c - Lexer interface
10405 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10406 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10407 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10408 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
10410 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10411 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10412 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10413 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10416 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10417 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10418 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10419 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10422 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10424 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10425 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10426 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10427 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
10430 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10431 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10432 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10435 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10436 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10439 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10440 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10441 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10442 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10443 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10445 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
10446 "@var{class-name}".}
10449 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10450 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10452 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
10453 "@var{class-name}".}
10457 @node Java Action Features
10458 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10460 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10461 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10463 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10464 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10467 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10468 This may not be assigned to.
10469 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10472 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10473 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10474 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10478 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10479 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10480 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10481 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10482 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10483 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10486 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10487 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10488 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10489 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10491 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10495 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10496 This may not be assigned to.
10497 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10501 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10502 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10505 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
10506 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10507 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10510 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
10511 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10512 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10515 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
10516 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
10517 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10520 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10521 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10522 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10524 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10527 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
10528 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
10529 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
10530 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10535 @node Java Differences
10536 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10538 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10539 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10540 section summarizes these differences.
10544 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10545 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10546 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10547 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10548 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10549 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10550 @xref{Java Action Features}.
10552 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10553 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10554 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10555 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10556 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10559 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10560 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10561 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10562 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10563 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10564 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10565 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10566 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
10567 @ref{Java Action Features}.
10570 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10572 @item @code{%code imports}
10573 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10574 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10575 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
10577 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10578 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10580 @item @code{%code lexer}
10581 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10582 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10583 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
10587 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10588 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10589 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10591 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10592 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10597 @node Java Declarations Summary
10598 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10600 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10601 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10603 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10604 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10607 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10608 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10609 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10610 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10611 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10614 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10615 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10616 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10617 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10620 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10621 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10622 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10623 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10626 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10627 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10628 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10631 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10632 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10633 a Java @emph{type}.
10634 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10637 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10638 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10639 @xref{Java Differences}.
10642 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10643 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10644 @xref{Java Differences}.
10647 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10648 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10649 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10652 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10653 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10654 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10655 @xref{Java Differences}.
10658 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10659 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
10660 @xref{Java Differences}.
10663 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10664 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10665 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10668 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10669 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10670 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10673 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10674 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10675 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10678 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10679 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10681 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10684 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10685 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10686 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10687 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10690 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
10691 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10692 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10693 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10694 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
10695 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10698 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10699 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10700 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10703 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10704 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10705 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10706 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10709 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
10710 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10711 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10712 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
10713 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10716 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10717 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10718 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10721 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10722 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10723 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10726 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10727 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10728 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10731 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10732 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10733 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10734 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10738 @c ================================================= FAQ
10741 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10742 @cindex frequently asked questions
10745 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10749 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10750 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10751 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10752 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10753 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10754 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10755 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10756 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10757 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10758 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10759 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10760 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10763 @node Memory Exhausted
10764 @section Memory Exhausted
10767 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10768 message. What can I do?
10771 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10774 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10775 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10777 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10778 following typical questions:
10781 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10782 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10783 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10790 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10791 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10792 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10795 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10796 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10797 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10798 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10799 @file{first-line.l}:
10805 #include <stdlib.h>
10809 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10813 yyparse (char const *file)
10815 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10819 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10823 /* One token only. */
10825 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10828 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10846 If the file @file{input} contains
10854 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10857 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10858 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10859 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10864 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10865 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10866 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10867 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10868 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10869 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10870 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10871 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10874 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10875 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10876 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10877 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10879 @node Strings are Destroyed
10880 @section Strings are Destroyed
10883 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10884 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10885 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10888 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10889 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10890 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10896 char *yylval = NULL;
10901 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10909 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10910 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10911 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10912 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10918 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10921 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10922 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10923 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10929 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10930 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10931 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10932 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10933 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10934 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10937 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10938 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10939 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10944 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10945 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10948 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10949 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10952 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10953 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10954 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10955 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10956 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10957 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10958 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10960 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10962 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10963 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10964 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10965 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10966 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10967 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10970 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10971 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10974 @node Multiple start-symbols
10975 @section Multiple start-symbols
10978 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10979 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10980 multiple entry points.
10983 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10984 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10985 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10986 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10990 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10997 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10998 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11000 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11001 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11002 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11003 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11004 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11005 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11006 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11007 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11010 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11015 int t = start_token;
11020 /* @r{The rules.} */
11024 @node Secure? Conform?
11025 @section Secure? Conform?
11028 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11031 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11032 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11033 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11034 please send us a bug report.
11036 @node I can't build Bison
11037 @section I can't build Bison
11040 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11041 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11045 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11046 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11047 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11048 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11049 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11050 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11051 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11054 @node Where can I find help?
11055 @section Where can I find help?
11058 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11061 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11062 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11063 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11064 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11065 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11066 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11067 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11068 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11072 @section Bug Reports
11075 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11078 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11079 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11080 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11081 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11082 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11084 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11085 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11086 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11087 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11088 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11090 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11091 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11092 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11093 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11094 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11095 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11097 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11098 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11100 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11102 @node More Languages
11103 @section More Languages
11106 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11107 favorite language here}?
11110 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11111 languages; contributions are welcome.
11114 @section Beta Testing
11117 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11120 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11121 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11122 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11123 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11124 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11125 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11126 essentially halted.
11128 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11129 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11130 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11131 systems are especially welcome.
11133 @node Mailing Lists
11134 @section Mailing Lists
11137 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11140 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11142 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11144 @node Table of Symbols
11145 @appendix Bison Symbols
11146 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11147 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11149 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11150 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11151 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11154 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11155 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11156 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11159 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11160 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11164 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11165 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11169 @deffn {Variable} $$
11170 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11174 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11175 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11176 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11179 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11180 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11184 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11185 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11189 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11190 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11191 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11192 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11195 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11196 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11197 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11198 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11199 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11203 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11204 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11207 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11208 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11212 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11213 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11216 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11217 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11218 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11221 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11222 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11225 This feature is experimental.
11226 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11229 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11232 @deffn {Directive} <>
11233 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11236 This feature is experimental.
11237 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11240 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11243 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11244 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11245 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11246 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11249 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11250 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11251 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11252 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11253 @xref{%code Summary}.
11256 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11257 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11261 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11262 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11263 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11268 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11269 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11270 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11271 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11274 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11275 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11276 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11279 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11280 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11281 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11284 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11285 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11286 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11289 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11290 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11291 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11295 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11296 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11297 used in the grammar.
11300 @deffn {Symbol} error
11301 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11302 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11303 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11304 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11305 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11306 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11307 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11308 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11311 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11312 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
11313 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11316 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11317 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11321 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11322 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11323 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11326 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11327 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11330 @deffn {Directive} %language
11331 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11332 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11335 @deffn {Directive} %left
11336 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
11337 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11340 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11341 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11342 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11346 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11347 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11348 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11349 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11350 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11353 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11354 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
11355 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
11357 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
11358 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
11359 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
11361 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
11362 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
11363 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
11364 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
11365 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
11366 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
11367 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
11368 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
11373 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11374 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11375 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11380 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11381 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11382 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11385 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11386 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
11387 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11390 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11391 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11392 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11395 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11396 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11397 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
11398 Function @code{yyparse}}.
11401 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11402 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11403 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11406 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11407 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11408 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11409 unreasonable usage.
11412 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11413 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11414 Require a Version of Bison}.
11417 @deffn {Directive} %right
11418 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
11419 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11422 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11423 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11424 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11427 @deffn {Directive} %start
11428 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11432 @deffn {Directive} %token
11433 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11434 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11437 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11438 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11439 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11442 @deffn {Directive} %type
11443 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11444 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11447 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11448 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11449 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11453 @deffn {Directive} %union
11454 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11455 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11458 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11459 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11460 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11461 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11462 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11464 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11468 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11469 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11470 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11471 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11473 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11477 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11478 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11479 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11482 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11483 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11484 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11485 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11486 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11489 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11490 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11491 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11494 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11495 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11496 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11499 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11500 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11501 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11502 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11505 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11506 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11507 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11510 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11511 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
11512 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
11513 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
11514 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
11515 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11517 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11521 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11522 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11523 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
11524 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11527 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11528 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
11529 to request verbose, specific error message strings
11530 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
11531 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it.
11532 Supported by the C skeletons only; using
11533 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11536 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
11537 Macro used to output run-time traces.
11538 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
11541 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11542 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11543 @xref{Memory Management}.
11546 @deffn {Function} yylex
11547 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11548 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11552 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11553 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11554 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11555 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11556 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11559 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11560 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11561 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11562 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11564 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11566 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11567 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11568 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11571 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11572 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11573 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11576 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11577 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11578 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11579 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11581 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11582 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11583 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11586 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11587 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11591 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11592 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11593 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11594 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11595 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11598 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11599 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11600 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11603 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
11604 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
11605 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
11606 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
11609 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11610 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11611 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11612 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11613 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11614 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11615 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11618 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11619 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11620 call this function to create a new parser.
11621 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11622 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11623 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11624 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11627 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11628 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11629 parse the rest of the input stream.
11630 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11631 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11632 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11633 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11636 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11637 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11638 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11639 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11640 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11641 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11644 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11645 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11646 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11647 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11648 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11651 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11652 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11653 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11654 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11657 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11658 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11659 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11660 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11661 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11662 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11663 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11665 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11666 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11667 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11668 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11669 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11670 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11671 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11674 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11675 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11676 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11684 @item Accepting state
11685 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11686 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11687 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11689 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11690 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11691 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11692 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11693 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11695 @item Consistent state
11696 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11698 @item Context-free grammars
11699 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11700 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11701 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11702 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11705 @item Default reduction
11706 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11707 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11708 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11709 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11712 @item Defaulted state
11713 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11715 @item Dynamic allocation
11716 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11717 compile time or on entry to a function.
11720 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11721 character string of length zero.
11723 @item Finite-state stack machine
11724 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11725 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11726 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11727 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11728 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11729 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11731 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11732 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11733 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11734 deterministic parsing
11735 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11736 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11737 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11741 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11742 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11743 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11745 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11746 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11747 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11748 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11749 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11750 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11751 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11752 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11753 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11754 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11756 @item Infix operator
11757 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11758 performs some operation.
11761 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11763 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11764 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11765 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11766 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11767 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11768 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11769 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11771 @item Language construct
11772 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11773 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11774 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11776 @item Left associativity
11777 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11778 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11779 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11781 @item Left recursion
11782 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11783 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11786 @item Left-to-right parsing
11787 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11788 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11790 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11791 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11792 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11794 @item Lexical tie-in
11795 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11796 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11798 @item Literal string token
11799 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11801 @item Lookahead token
11802 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11806 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11807 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11808 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11811 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11812 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11814 @item Nonterminal symbol
11815 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11816 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11817 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11820 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11821 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11824 @item Postfix operator
11825 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11826 performs some operation.
11829 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11830 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11834 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11835 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11836 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11838 @item Reverse polish notation
11839 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11841 @item Right recursion
11842 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11843 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11847 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11848 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11849 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11852 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11853 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11854 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11856 @item Single-character literal
11857 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11858 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11861 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11862 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11863 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11864 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11867 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11868 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11869 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11872 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11873 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11876 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11877 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11878 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11879 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11881 @item Terminal symbol
11882 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11883 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11884 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11886 @item Unreachable state
11887 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11888 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11889 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11892 @node Copying This Manual
11893 @appendix Copying This Manual
11897 @unnumbered Bibliography
11901 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11902 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11903 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11904 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11906 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11907 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11908 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11909 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11910 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11912 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11913 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11914 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11915 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11916 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11918 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11919 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11920 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11921 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11922 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11925 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11926 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11927 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11930 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11931 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11932 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11933 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11936 @node Index of Terms
11937 @unnumbered Index of Terms
11943 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11944 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11945 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11946 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11947 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11948 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11949 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11950 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11951 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11952 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11953 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11954 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11955 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11956 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
11957 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11958 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11959 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11960 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11961 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11962 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11963 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11964 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11965 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11966 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
11967 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11968 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11969 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11970 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11971 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11972 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11973 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
11974 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
11975 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11976 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
11977 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11978 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11979 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11980 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
11981 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11982 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
11983 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11984 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11985 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11986 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11987 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
11988 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11989 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11990 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11991 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11992 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
11993 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
11994 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
11995 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
11996 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
11997 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose
11999 @c Local Variables:
12000 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"