1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2011 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
190 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
192 Outline of a Bison Grammar
194 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
195 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
196 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
197 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
198 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
200 Defining Language Semantics
202 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
203 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
204 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
205 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
206 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
207 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
208 action in the middle of a rule.
209 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
227 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
228 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
229 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
230 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
231 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
232 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
234 Parser C-Language Interface
236 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
237 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
238 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
241 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
243 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
244 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
245 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
248 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
250 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
251 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
252 of the token it has read.
253 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
254 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
256 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
257 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
259 The Bison Parser Algorithm
261 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
262 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
263 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
264 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
265 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
266 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
267 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
268 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
269 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
273 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
274 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
275 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
276 * How Precedence:: How they work.
278 Handling Context Dependencies
280 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
281 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
282 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
283 error recovery rules must be written.
285 Debugging Your Parser
287 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
288 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
292 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
293 in alphabetical order by short options.
294 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
295 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
297 Parsers Written In Other Languages
299 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
300 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
304 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
305 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
306 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
307 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
308 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
309 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
311 A Complete C++ Example
313 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
314 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
315 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
316 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
317 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
321 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
322 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
323 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
324 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
325 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
326 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
327 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
328 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
330 Frequently Asked Questions
332 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
333 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
334 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
335 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
336 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
337 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
338 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
339 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
340 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
341 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
342 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
343 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
347 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
353 @unnumbered Introduction
356 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
357 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
358 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
359 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
360 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
361 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
362 calculators to complex programming languages.
364 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
365 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
366 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
367 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
368 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
371 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
372 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
373 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
374 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
377 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
378 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
379 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
380 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
381 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
382 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
385 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
388 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
390 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
391 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
392 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
393 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
394 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
396 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
398 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
399 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
400 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
401 License to all of the Bison source code.
403 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
404 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
405 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
406 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
407 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
408 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
409 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
411 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
412 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
413 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
414 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
415 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
416 using the other GNU tools.
418 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
419 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
420 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
421 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
425 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
426 @include gpl-3.0.texi
429 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
431 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
432 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
433 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
436 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
437 as mathematical ideas.
438 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
439 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
440 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
441 the name of an identifier, etc.).
442 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
443 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
444 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
445 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
446 how is the output used?
447 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
448 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
451 @node Language and Grammar
452 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
454 @cindex context-free grammar
455 @cindex grammar, context-free
456 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
457 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
458 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
459 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
460 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
461 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
462 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
463 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
467 @cindex Backus-Naur form
468 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
469 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
470 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
471 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
472 essentially machine-readable BNF.
474 @cindex LALR(1) grammars
475 @cindex IELR(1) grammars
476 @cindex LR(1) grammars
477 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars.
478 Although it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is
479 optimized for what are called LR(1) grammars.
480 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to tell how to parse
481 any portion of an input string with just a single token of lookahead.
482 For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the additional
483 restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
484 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
485 more information on this.
486 As an experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
487 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables.
488 @xref{%define Summary,,lr.type}, to learn how.
491 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
492 @cindex ambiguous grammars
493 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
495 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
496 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
497 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
498 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
499 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
500 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
501 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
502 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
503 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
504 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
505 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
506 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
507 possible parses of any given string is finite.
509 @cindex symbols (abstract)
511 @cindex syntactic grouping
512 @cindex grouping, syntactic
513 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
514 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
515 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
516 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
517 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
518 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
519 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
521 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
522 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
523 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
524 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
525 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
526 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
527 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
528 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
529 lexicography, not grammar.)
531 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
535 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
536 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
537 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
538 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
539 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
540 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
541 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
546 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
547 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
548 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
549 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
550 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
554 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
555 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
556 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
557 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
558 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
559 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
560 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
561 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
563 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
564 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
565 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
566 reads informally as follows:
569 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
574 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
578 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
579 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
580 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
581 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
584 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
585 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
586 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
587 not the start symbol.
589 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
590 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
591 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
592 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
593 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
594 reports a syntax error.
596 @node Grammar in Bison
597 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
598 @cindex Bison grammar
599 @cindex grammar, Bison
600 @cindex formal grammar
602 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
603 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
604 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
606 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
607 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
608 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
610 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
611 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
612 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
613 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
614 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
615 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
616 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
619 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
620 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
621 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
622 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
624 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
625 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
627 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
628 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
629 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
630 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
634 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
639 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
641 @node Semantic Values
642 @section Semantic Values
643 @cindex semantic value
644 @cindex value, semantic
646 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
647 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
648 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
649 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
650 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
653 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
654 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
655 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
656 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
657 ,Defining Language Semantics},
660 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
661 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
662 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
663 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
666 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
667 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
668 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
669 need to have any semantic value.)
671 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
672 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
673 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
674 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
675 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
676 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
678 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
679 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
680 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
681 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
682 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
684 @node Semantic Actions
685 @section Semantic Actions
686 @cindex semantic actions
687 @cindex actions, semantic
689 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
690 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
691 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
692 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
695 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
696 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
697 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
698 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
699 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
700 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
701 newly recognized larger expression.
703 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
707 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
712 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
713 from the values of the two subexpressions.
716 @section Writing GLR Parsers
718 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
721 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
722 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
724 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
725 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
726 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
727 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
728 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
729 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
730 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
731 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
732 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
734 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
735 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
736 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
737 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
738 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
739 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
740 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
741 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
742 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
743 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
744 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
745 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
746 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
747 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
748 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
749 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
750 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
751 identical set of symbols.
753 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
754 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
755 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
756 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
757 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
758 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
759 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
760 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
761 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
765 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
766 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
767 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
768 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
771 @node Simple GLR Parsers
772 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
773 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
774 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
778 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
779 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
781 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
782 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
783 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
785 Consider a problem that
786 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
787 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
790 type subrange = lo .. hi;
791 type enum = (a, b, c);
795 The original language standard allows only numeric
796 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
797 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
798 10206) and many other
799 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
800 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
804 type subrange = (a) .. b;
808 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
809 type with only one value:
816 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
817 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
819 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
820 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
821 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
822 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
823 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
824 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
825 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
826 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
828 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
829 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
830 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
831 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
834 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
835 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
836 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
837 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
838 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
839 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
842 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
843 use the GLR algorithm.
844 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
845 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
846 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
847 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
848 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
849 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
850 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
851 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
852 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
854 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
855 reports a syntax error as usual.
857 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
858 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
859 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
860 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
861 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
863 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
864 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
865 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
866 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
867 The present example contains only one conflict between two
868 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
869 cannot be nested. So the number of
870 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
871 and the parsing time is still linear.
873 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
874 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
877 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
887 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
892 type : '(' id_list ')'
914 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
915 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
916 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
917 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
924 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
925 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
926 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
935 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
936 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
937 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
938 notice when the parser splits.
940 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
941 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
942 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
943 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
944 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
945 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
946 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
947 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
948 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
949 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
950 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
951 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
952 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
955 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
956 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
957 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
958 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
959 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
960 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
962 @node Merging GLR Parses
963 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
964 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
965 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
969 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
971 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
976 #define YYSTYPE char const *
978 void yyerror (char const *);
991 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
994 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
998 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
999 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1000 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1001 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1002 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1005 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1006 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1007 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1008 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1011 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1012 | '(' declarator ')'
1017 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1018 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1025 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1026 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1027 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1028 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1029 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1030 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1031 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1032 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1033 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1034 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1035 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1036 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1037 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1038 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1040 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1041 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1042 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1043 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1044 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1045 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1046 The parser therefore prints
1049 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1052 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1053 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1060 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1061 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1062 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1063 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1064 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1065 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1066 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1067 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1068 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1069 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1075 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1076 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1077 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1078 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1082 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1083 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1088 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1092 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1100 with an accompanying forward declaration
1101 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1105 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1106 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1111 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1112 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1115 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1118 Bison requires that all of the
1119 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1120 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1121 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1122 the offending merge.
1124 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1125 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1127 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1128 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1129 the associated reduction.
1130 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1131 action in a GLR parser.
1134 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1136 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1138 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1139 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1140 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1141 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1142 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1143 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1144 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1145 influence syntax analysis.
1146 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1149 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1150 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1151 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1152 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1153 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1154 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1155 future versions of Bison.
1156 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1157 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1158 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1161 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1162 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1163 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1164 initiate error recovery.
1165 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1166 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1167 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1168 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1170 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1171 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1173 @node Compiler Requirements
1174 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1175 @cindex @code{inline}
1176 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1178 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1179 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1180 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1181 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1182 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1183 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1192 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1196 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1202 @node Locations Overview
1205 @cindex textual location
1206 @cindex location, textual
1208 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1209 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1210 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1211 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1213 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1214 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1215 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1216 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1218 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1219 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1220 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1223 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1224 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1225 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1226 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1227 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1228 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1229 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1232 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1233 @cindex Bison parser
1234 @cindex Bison utility
1235 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1238 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1239 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1240 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1241 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1242 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1243 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1244 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1247 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1248 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1249 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1252 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1253 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1254 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1255 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1256 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1257 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1258 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1260 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1261 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1262 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1263 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1264 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1265 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1266 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1267 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1268 C-Language Interface}.
1270 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1271 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1272 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1273 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1274 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1275 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1276 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1277 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1278 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1279 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1280 anything other than their usual meanings.
1282 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1283 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1284 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1285 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1286 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1287 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1288 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1289 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1290 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1293 @section Stages in Using Bison
1294 @cindex stages in using Bison
1297 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1298 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1302 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1303 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1304 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1305 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1306 sequence of C statements.
1309 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1310 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1311 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1312 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1315 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1318 Write error-reporting routines.
1321 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1322 must follow these steps:
1326 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1329 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1332 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1335 @node Grammar Layout
1336 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1337 @cindex grammar file
1339 @cindex format of grammar file
1340 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1342 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1343 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1350 @var{Bison declarations}
1359 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1360 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1362 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1363 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1364 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1365 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1366 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1367 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1369 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1370 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1371 semantic values of various symbols.
1373 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1376 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1377 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1378 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1382 @cindex simple examples
1383 @cindex examples, simple
1385 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1386 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1387 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1388 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1389 desk-top calculator.
1391 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1392 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1393 source file to try them.
1396 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1397 a first example with no operator precedence.
1398 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1399 Operator precedence is introduced.
1400 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1401 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1402 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1403 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1404 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1408 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1409 @cindex reverse polish notation
1410 @cindex polish notation calculator
1411 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1412 @cindex calculator, simple
1414 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1415 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1416 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1417 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1419 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1420 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1423 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1424 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1425 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1426 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1427 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1428 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1429 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1432 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1433 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1435 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1436 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1439 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1442 #define YYSTYPE double
1445 void yyerror (char const *);
1450 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1453 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1454 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1456 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1457 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1458 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1459 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1460 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1461 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1462 which is a floating point number.
1464 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1465 function @code{pow}.
1467 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1468 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1469 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1470 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1473 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1474 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1475 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1476 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1477 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1478 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1479 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1480 type for numeric constants.
1483 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1485 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1493 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1496 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1497 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1498 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1499 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1500 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1501 /* Exponentiation */
1502 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1504 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1509 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1510 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1511 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1512 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1513 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1516 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1517 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1518 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1520 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1521 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1522 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1523 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1524 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1525 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1534 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1536 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1544 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1545 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1546 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1547 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1548 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1550 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1551 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1552 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1553 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1554 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1555 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1557 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1558 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1559 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1560 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1563 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1564 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1565 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1568 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1570 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1574 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1578 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1579 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1580 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1581 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1582 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1583 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1584 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1586 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1587 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1588 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1589 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1590 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1593 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1595 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1596 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1597 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1598 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1602 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1603 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1608 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1609 equally well have written them separately:
1613 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1614 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1618 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1619 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1620 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1621 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1622 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1623 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1624 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1625 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1627 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1628 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1629 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1631 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1632 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1636 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1640 means the same thing as this:
1644 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1650 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1653 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1654 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1655 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1657 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1658 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1659 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1660 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1662 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1664 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1665 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1666 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1667 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1669 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1670 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1671 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1672 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1673 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1674 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1675 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1676 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1677 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1679 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1680 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1681 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1682 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1683 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1685 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1686 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1688 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1692 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1693 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1694 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1695 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1706 /* Skip white space. */
1707 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1711 /* Process numbers. */
1712 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1715 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1720 /* Return end-of-input. */
1723 /* Return a single char. */
1730 @subsection The Controlling Function
1731 @cindex controlling function
1732 @cindex main function in simple example
1734 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1735 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1736 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1749 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1750 @cindex error reporting routine
1752 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1753 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1754 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1755 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1756 here is the definition we will use:
1762 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1764 yyerror (char const *s)
1766 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1771 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1772 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1773 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1774 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1775 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1776 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1778 @node Rpcalc Generate
1779 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1780 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1782 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1783 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1784 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1785 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1786 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1787 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1789 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1790 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1792 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1793 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1800 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1801 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1802 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1803 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1804 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1805 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1806 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1808 @node Rpcalc Compile
1809 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1810 @cindex compiling the parser
1812 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1816 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1818 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1822 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1823 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1824 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1828 # @r{List files again.}
1830 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1834 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1835 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1841 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1843 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1847 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1849 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1854 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1855 @cindex infix notation calculator
1857 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1859 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1860 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1861 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1862 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1865 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1868 #define YYSTYPE double
1872 void yyerror (char const *);
1875 /* Bison declarations. */
1879 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1880 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1882 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1888 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1891 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1892 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1893 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1894 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1895 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1896 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1897 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1898 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1904 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1907 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1909 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1910 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1911 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1912 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1913 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1914 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1917 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1918 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1919 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1920 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1921 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1924 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1925 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1926 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1927 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1928 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1930 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1935 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1943 @node Simple Error Recovery
1944 @section Simple Error Recovery
1945 @cindex error recovery, simple
1947 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1948 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1949 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1950 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1951 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1952 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1954 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1955 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1956 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1961 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1962 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1967 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1968 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1969 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1970 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1971 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1972 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1973 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1974 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1977 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1978 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1979 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1980 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1981 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1982 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1985 @node Location Tracking Calc
1986 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1987 @cindex location tracking calculator
1988 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1989 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1991 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1992 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
1993 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
1994 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
1998 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
1999 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2000 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2003 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2004 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2006 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2007 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2010 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2016 void yyerror (char const *);
2019 /* Bison declarations. */
2027 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2031 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2032 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2033 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2034 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2035 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2036 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2037 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2041 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2043 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2044 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2045 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2046 from the new information.
2048 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2049 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2060 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2065 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2066 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2067 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2068 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2078 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2079 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2080 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2085 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2086 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2087 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2091 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2092 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2093 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2095 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2096 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2097 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2098 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2099 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2100 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2104 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2106 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2107 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2108 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2111 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2112 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2123 /* Skip white space. */
2124 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2125 ++yylloc.last_column;
2130 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2131 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2135 /* Process numbers. */
2139 ++yylloc.last_column;
2140 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2142 ++yylloc.last_column;
2143 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2150 /* Return end-of-input. */
2154 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2158 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2161 ++yylloc.last_column;
2166 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2167 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2168 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2169 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2171 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2172 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2173 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2174 controlling function:
2181 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2182 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2188 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2189 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2190 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2192 @node Multi-function Calc
2193 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2194 @cindex multi-function calculator
2195 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2196 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2198 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2199 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2200 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2201 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2202 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2204 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2205 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2206 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2207 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2208 functions whose syntax has this form:
2211 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2215 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2216 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2217 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2221 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2225 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2231 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2236 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2239 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2240 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2241 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2244 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2245 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2247 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2252 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2253 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2255 void yyerror (char const *);
2260 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2261 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2264 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2265 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2272 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2273 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2275 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2278 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2279 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2280 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2282 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2283 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2284 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2285 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2287 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2288 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2289 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2290 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2291 between angle brackets).
2293 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2294 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2295 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2296 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2297 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2298 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2301 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2303 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2304 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2305 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2317 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2318 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2323 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2324 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2325 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2326 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2327 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2328 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2329 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2330 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2331 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2332 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2333 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2336 /* End of grammar. */
2340 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2341 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2342 @cindex symbol table example
2344 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2345 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2346 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2347 requires some additional C functions for support.
2349 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2350 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2351 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2355 /* Function type. */
2356 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2360 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2363 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2364 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2367 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2368 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2370 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2375 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2377 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2378 extern symrec *sym_table;
2380 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2381 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2385 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2386 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2387 @code{init_table} as well:
2393 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2395 yyerror (char const *s)
2405 double (*fnct) (double);
2410 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2423 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2428 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2434 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2436 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2437 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2452 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2453 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2455 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2456 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2457 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2458 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2459 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2460 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2464 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2467 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2468 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2469 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2470 ptr->type = sym_type;
2471 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2472 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2478 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2481 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2482 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2483 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2489 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2490 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2491 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2492 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2494 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2495 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2496 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2497 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2498 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2499 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2501 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2502 operators in @code{yylex}.
2515 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2516 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2523 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2524 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2527 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2533 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2537 static char *symbuf = 0;
2538 static int length = 0;
2543 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2544 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2546 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2553 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2557 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2559 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2561 /* Get another character. */
2566 while (isalnum (c));
2573 s = getsym (symbuf);
2575 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2580 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2586 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2587 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2588 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2596 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2599 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2600 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2601 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2604 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2605 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2609 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2611 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2612 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2614 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2615 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2618 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2619 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2620 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2621 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2622 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2623 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2624 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2625 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2628 @node Grammar Outline
2629 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2631 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2632 appropriate delimiters:
2639 @var{Bison declarations}
2648 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2649 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2650 continues until end of line.
2653 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2654 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2655 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2656 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2657 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2661 @subsection The prologue
2662 @cindex declarations section
2664 @cindex declarations
2666 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2667 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2668 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2669 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2670 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2671 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2672 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2674 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2675 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2678 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2679 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2680 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2681 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2682 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2683 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2684 @code{%union} declaration.
2695 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2699 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2700 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2706 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2707 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2708 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2709 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2710 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2711 @code{#include} directives.
2713 @node Prologue Alternatives
2714 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2715 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2718 @findex %code requires
2719 @findex %code provides
2722 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2723 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2724 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2725 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2726 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2727 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2728 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2730 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2741 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2745 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2746 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2753 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2754 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2755 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2756 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2757 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2758 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2759 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2760 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2761 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2762 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2763 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2765 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2766 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2767 This behavior raises a few questions.
2768 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2769 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2770 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2771 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2772 This behavior is not intuitive.
2774 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2775 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2776 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2777 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2784 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2785 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2788 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2789 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2801 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2805 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2806 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2807 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2814 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2815 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2816 explicit which kind you intend.
2817 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2819 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2820 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2821 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2822 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2823 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2824 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2825 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2826 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2827 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2830 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2831 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2833 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2846 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2850 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2851 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2862 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2863 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2864 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2871 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2872 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2873 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2874 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2875 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2876 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2878 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2879 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2880 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2881 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2882 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2883 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2884 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2885 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2886 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2887 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2888 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2891 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2892 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2893 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2894 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2895 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2896 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2897 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2898 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2899 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2900 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
2913 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2917 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2918 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2929 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2933 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2934 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2941 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
2942 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
2943 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
2946 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
2947 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
2948 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
2949 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
2950 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
2951 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
2954 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
2955 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
2956 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
2957 the grammar file affects its functionality.
2959 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
2960 organize your grammar file.
2961 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
2965 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
2966 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
2967 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
2968 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
2970 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
2971 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
2972 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
2973 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
2977 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
2978 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
2980 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
2982 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
2983 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
2984 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
2985 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
2987 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
2988 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
2989 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
2990 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
2991 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
2992 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
2993 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
2994 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
2997 @node Bison Declarations
2998 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
2999 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3000 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3002 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3003 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3004 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3005 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3008 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3009 @cindex grammar rules section
3010 @cindex rules section for grammar
3012 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3013 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3015 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3016 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3017 if it is the first thing in the file.
3020 @subsection The epilogue
3021 @cindex additional C code section
3023 @cindex C code, section for additional
3025 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3026 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3027 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3028 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3029 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3030 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3031 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3032 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3033 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3034 C-Language Interface}.
3036 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3037 from the grammar rules.
3039 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3040 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3041 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3042 of the grammar file.
3045 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3046 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3047 @cindex terminal symbol
3051 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3054 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3055 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3056 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3057 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3058 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3059 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3060 the symbol to stand for it.
3062 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3063 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3064 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3066 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3067 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3068 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3069 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3070 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3071 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3072 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3074 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3078 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3079 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3080 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3081 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3084 @cindex character token
3085 @cindex literal token
3086 @cindex single-character literal
3087 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3088 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3089 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3090 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3091 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3092 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3093 ,Operator Precedence}).
3095 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3096 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3097 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3098 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3099 your program will confuse other readers.
3101 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3102 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3103 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3104 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3105 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3106 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3110 @cindex string token
3111 @cindex literal string token
3112 @cindex multicharacter literal
3113 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3114 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3115 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3116 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3117 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3119 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3120 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3121 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3122 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3123 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3125 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3127 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3128 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3129 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3130 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3131 read your program will be confused.
3133 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3134 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3135 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3136 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3137 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3138 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3141 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3142 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3143 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3145 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3146 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3147 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3148 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3149 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3150 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3151 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3152 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3153 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3154 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3155 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3156 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3158 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3159 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3160 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3161 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3162 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3164 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3165 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3166 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3167 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3168 characters in the following C-language string:
3171 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3174 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3175 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3176 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3177 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3178 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3179 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3180 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3181 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3182 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3183 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3186 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3187 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3188 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3189 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3190 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3193 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3195 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3196 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3198 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3202 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3208 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3209 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3210 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3222 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3223 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3225 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3226 extra white space as you wish.
3228 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3229 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3232 @{@var{C statements}@}
3237 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3238 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3239 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3240 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3241 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3242 compiler can check it.
3244 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3245 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3246 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3247 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3248 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3249 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3250 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3251 character constants.
3253 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3257 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3258 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3262 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3263 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3270 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3272 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3273 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3274 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3291 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3295 @section Recursive Rules
3296 @cindex recursive rule
3298 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3299 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3300 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3301 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3302 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3312 @cindex left recursion
3313 @cindex right recursion
3315 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3316 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3317 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3328 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3329 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3330 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3331 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3332 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3333 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3334 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3337 @cindex mutual recursion
3338 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3339 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3340 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3348 | primary '+' primary
3360 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3364 @section Defining Language Semantics
3365 @cindex defining language semantics
3366 @cindex language semantics, defining
3368 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3369 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3370 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3372 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3373 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3374 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3375 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3378 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3379 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3380 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3381 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3382 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3383 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3384 action in the middle of a rule.
3385 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
3389 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3390 @cindex semantic value type
3391 @cindex value type, semantic
3392 @cindex data types of semantic values
3393 @cindex default data type
3395 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3396 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3397 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3398 Notation Calculator}).
3400 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3401 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3402 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3405 #define YYSTYPE double
3409 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3410 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3411 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3412 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3414 @node Multiple Types
3415 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3417 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3418 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3419 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3420 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3423 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3424 requires you to do two things:
3428 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3429 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3430 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3431 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3435 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3436 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3437 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3438 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3439 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3448 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3450 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3451 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3452 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3453 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3455 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3456 placed at any position in the rule;
3457 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3458 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3459 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3460 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3462 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3463 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3464 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3465 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3466 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3467 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3468 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3469 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3470 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3471 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3474 Here is a typical example:
3484 Or, in terms of named references:
3488 exp[result]: @dots{}
3489 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3490 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3495 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3496 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3497 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3498 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3499 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3500 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3502 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3503 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3504 referred to as @code{$2}.
3506 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
3507 about using the named references construct.
3509 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3510 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3511 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3512 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3513 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3517 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3521 @cindex default action
3522 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3523 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3524 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3525 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3526 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3527 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3529 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3530 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3531 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3532 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3533 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3537 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3538 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3544 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3549 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3550 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3551 definition of @code{foo}.
3554 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3555 any, from a semantic action.
3556 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3557 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3560 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3561 @cindex action data types
3562 @cindex data types in actions
3564 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3565 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3567 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3568 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3569 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3570 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3571 in the rule. In this example,
3582 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3583 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3584 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3585 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3587 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3588 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3589 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3601 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3602 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3604 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3605 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3606 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3607 @cindex mid-rule actions
3609 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3610 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3611 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3613 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3614 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3615 it is run before they are parsed.
3617 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3618 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3619 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3620 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3623 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3624 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3625 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3626 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3627 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3628 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3630 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3631 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3632 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3633 at the end of the rule.
3635 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3636 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3637 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3638 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3639 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3640 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3644 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3645 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3646 declare_variable ($3); @}
3648 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3653 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3654 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3655 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3656 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3657 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3658 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3659 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3660 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3662 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3663 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3664 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3665 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3666 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3669 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3670 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3671 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3672 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3673 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3675 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3676 Discarded Symbols}).
3677 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3678 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3680 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3681 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3686 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3692 pop_context ($1); @}
3695 let: LET '(' var ')'
3696 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3697 declare_variable ($3); @}
3704 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3705 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3706 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3708 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3709 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3710 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3711 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3712 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3717 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3718 | '@{' statements '@}'
3724 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3728 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3729 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3732 | '@{' statements '@}'
3738 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3739 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3740 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3741 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3742 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3743 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3745 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3746 actions into the two rules, like this:
3750 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3751 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3752 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3753 '@{' statements '@}'
3759 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3760 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3762 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3763 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3764 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3768 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3769 declarations statements '@}'
3770 | '@{' statements '@}'
3776 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3777 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3779 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3780 serves as a subroutine:
3784 subroutine: /* empty */
3785 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3791 compound: subroutine
3792 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3794 '@{' statements '@}'
3800 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3801 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3803 @node Named References
3804 @subsection Using Named References
3805 @cindex named references
3807 While every semantic value can be accessed with positional references
3808 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$}, it's often much more convenient to refer to
3809 them by name. First of all, original symbol names may be used as named
3810 references. For example:
3814 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3815 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
3820 The positional @code{$$}, @code{@@$}, @code{$n}, and @code{@@n} can be
3821 mixed with @code{$name} and @code{@@name} arbitrarily. For example:
3825 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3826 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
3831 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
3837 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
3840 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
3843 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
3848 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
3849 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
3850 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
3853 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
3854 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
3859 Explicit names may be declared for RHS and for LHS symbols as well. In order
3860 to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an explicit name
3861 may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the closing brace of
3862 the mid-rule action code:
3865 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
3866 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
3872 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
3873 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
3876 if-stmt: IF '(' expr ')' THEN then.stmt ';'
3877 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
3881 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
3882 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
3883 @code{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
3884 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @samp{suffix} field of the semantic
3885 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @code{name.suffix} in its entirety
3886 as the name of a semantic value, bracketed syntax @code{$[name.suffix]}
3891 @section Tracking Locations
3893 @cindex textual location
3894 @cindex location, textual
3896 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3897 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3898 especially symbol locations.
3900 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3901 actions to take when rules are matched.
3904 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3905 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3906 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3910 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3911 @cindex data type of locations
3912 @cindex default location type
3914 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3915 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3917 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3918 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3919 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3920 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3924 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3933 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3934 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3935 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3936 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3937 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3939 @node Actions and Locations
3940 @subsection Actions and Locations
3941 @cindex location actions
3942 @cindex actions, location
3945 @vindex @@@var{name}
3946 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3948 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3949 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3951 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3952 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3953 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3954 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3955 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3958 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3959 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3960 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
3961 about using the named references construct.
3963 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3970 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3971 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3972 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3973 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3980 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3981 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3982 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3988 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3989 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3990 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3993 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3994 example above simply rewrites this way:
4007 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4008 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4009 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4016 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4017 from a semantic action.
4018 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4019 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4021 @node Location Default Action
4022 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4023 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4024 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4026 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4027 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4028 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4029 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4030 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4031 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4032 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4033 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4036 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4037 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4039 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4040 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4041 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4042 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4043 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4044 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4045 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4046 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4047 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4048 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4050 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4054 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
4058 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4059 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4060 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4061 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4065 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
4066 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4067 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
4068 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4074 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4075 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4076 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4078 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4082 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4083 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4086 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4087 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4088 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4089 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4092 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4093 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4094 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4095 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4099 @section Bison Declarations
4100 @cindex declarations, Bison
4101 @cindex Bison declarations
4103 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4104 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4107 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4108 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4109 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4110 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4112 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4113 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4114 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4115 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4118 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4119 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4120 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4121 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4122 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4123 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4124 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4125 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4126 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4127 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4128 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4129 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4130 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4131 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4135 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4136 @cindex version requirement
4137 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4140 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4141 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4145 %require "@var{version}"
4149 @subsection Token Type Names
4150 @cindex declaring token type names
4151 @cindex token type names, declaring
4152 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4155 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4161 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4162 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4163 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4165 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4166 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4167 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4170 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4171 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4172 following the token name:
4176 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4180 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4181 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4182 with each other or with normal characters.
4184 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4185 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4186 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4187 Than One Value Type}).
4193 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4197 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4201 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4202 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4203 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4210 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4211 equivalent literal string tokens:
4214 %token <operator> OR "||"
4215 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4220 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4221 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4222 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4223 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4224 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4225 the literal string instead of the token name.
4227 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4228 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4232 %token END 0 "end of file"
4235 @node Precedence Decl
4236 @subsection Operator Precedence
4237 @cindex precedence declarations
4238 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4239 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4241 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4242 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4243 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4244 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4245 operator precedence.
4247 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4248 @code{%token}: either
4251 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4258 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4261 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4262 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4263 all the @var{symbols}:
4267 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4268 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4269 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4270 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4271 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4272 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4273 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4274 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4275 considered a syntax error.
4278 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4279 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4280 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4281 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4282 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4285 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4286 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4287 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4288 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4293 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4294 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4298 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4299 @cindex declaring value types
4300 @cindex value types, declaring
4303 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4304 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4305 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4320 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4321 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4322 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4323 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4325 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4326 @code{union}. For example:
4338 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4339 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4342 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4343 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4344 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4346 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4347 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4349 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4350 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4351 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4352 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4360 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4365 and then your grammar can use the following
4366 instead of @code{%union}:
4379 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4380 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4381 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4385 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4386 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4387 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4390 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4394 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4395 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4396 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4397 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4398 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4401 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4402 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4403 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4404 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4406 @node Initial Action Decl
4407 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4408 @findex %initial-action
4410 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4411 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4414 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4415 @findex %initial-action
4416 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4417 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4418 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4419 @code{%parse-param}.
4422 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4425 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4428 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4433 @node Destructor Decl
4434 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4435 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4439 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4440 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4441 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4442 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4443 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4444 must discard the start symbol.
4446 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4447 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4448 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4449 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4451 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4452 symbol is automatically discarded.
4454 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4456 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4458 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4459 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4460 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4461 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4463 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4464 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4465 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4466 tag among @var{symbols}.
4467 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4468 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4469 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4471 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4472 (These default forms are experimental.
4473 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4475 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4476 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4477 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4478 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4480 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4481 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4482 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4483 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4484 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4491 %union @{ char *string; @}
4492 %token <string> STRING1
4493 %token <string> STRING2
4494 %type <string> string1
4495 %type <string> string2
4496 %union @{ char character; @}
4497 %token <character> CHR
4498 %type <character> chr
4501 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4502 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4503 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4504 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4508 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4509 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4510 to @code{free} by default.
4511 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4512 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4513 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4514 @code{free} only once.
4515 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4516 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4518 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4519 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4520 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4521 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4522 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4523 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4524 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4525 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4526 reference it in your grammar.
4527 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4528 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4534 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4535 @cindex mid-rule actions
4536 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4537 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4538 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you do
4539 not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}} (where
4540 @var{n} is the RHS symbol position of the mid-rule) in any later action in that
4542 However, if you do reference either, the Bison-generated parser will invoke the
4543 @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4547 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4548 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4549 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4554 @cindex discarded symbols
4555 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4559 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4561 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4563 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4564 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4566 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4569 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4570 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4573 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4574 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4575 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4579 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4580 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4581 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4582 @cindex warnings, preventing
4583 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4587 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4588 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4589 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4590 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4591 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4592 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4594 The declaration looks like this:
4600 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4601 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4602 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4603 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4605 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4606 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4607 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4608 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4609 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4610 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4611 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4617 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4621 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4622 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4623 print the number of conflicts.
4626 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4627 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4628 go back to the beginning.
4631 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4632 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4633 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4636 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4637 but will keep silent otherwise.
4640 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4641 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4642 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4643 @cindex default start symbol
4646 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4647 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4648 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4655 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4656 @cindex reentrant parser
4658 @findex %define api.pure
4660 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4661 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4662 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4663 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4664 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4665 program must be called only within interlocks.
4667 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4668 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4669 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4670 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4671 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4673 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4674 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4675 reentrant. It looks like this:
4681 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4682 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4683 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4684 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4685 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4686 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4687 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4688 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4689 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4691 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4692 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4696 @subsection A Push Parser
4699 @findex %define api.push-pull
4701 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4702 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4704 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4705 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4706 each time a new token is made available.
4708 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4709 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4710 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4711 within a certain time period.
4713 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4714 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4715 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4718 %define api.push-pull push
4721 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4722 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4723 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4724 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4725 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4729 %define api.push-pull push
4732 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4733 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4734 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4735 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4737 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4738 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4739 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4740 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4741 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4742 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4743 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4744 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4748 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4750 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4751 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4752 yypstate_delete (ps);
4755 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4756 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4757 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4758 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4759 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4760 example would thus look like this:
4765 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4768 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4769 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4770 yypstate_delete (ps);
4773 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4774 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4776 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4777 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4778 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4779 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4780 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4781 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4782 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4783 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4784 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4785 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4786 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4787 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4788 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4789 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4790 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4791 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4792 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4796 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4797 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4798 yypstate_delete (ps);
4801 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4802 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4803 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
4806 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4807 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4808 @cindex declaration summary
4809 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4811 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4813 @deffn {Directive} %union
4814 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4815 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4818 @deffn {Directive} %token
4819 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4820 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4823 @deffn {Directive} %right
4824 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4825 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4828 @deffn {Directive} %left
4829 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4830 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4833 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4834 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4835 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4836 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4840 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4841 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4842 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4846 @deffn {Directive} %type
4847 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4848 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4851 @deffn {Directive} %start
4852 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4856 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4857 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4858 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4864 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4867 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4868 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4870 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
4871 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
4872 @xref{%code Summary}.
4875 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4876 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
4877 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
4878 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4881 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4882 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4883 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4884 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
4887 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4888 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
4889 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4890 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
4891 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4893 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
4894 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
4895 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
4896 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
4897 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
4898 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
4899 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
4900 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
4901 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
4902 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
4904 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
4905 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
4906 (Reentrant) Parser}.
4908 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
4909 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
4910 the @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations,
4911 ,Tracking Locations}.
4913 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
4914 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
4915 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
4916 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
4917 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
4919 @findex %code requires
4920 @findex %code provides
4921 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
4922 header also contains their code.
4923 @xref{%code Summary}.
4926 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
4927 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
4930 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
4931 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
4932 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
4935 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
4936 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
4937 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
4940 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
4941 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
4942 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
4943 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
4945 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
4949 @deffn {Directive} %locations
4950 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
4951 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
4952 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
4953 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
4954 accurate syntax error messages.
4957 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
4958 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
4959 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
4961 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
4962 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
4963 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
4964 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
4965 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
4966 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
4967 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
4968 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
4970 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
4974 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
4975 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
4976 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
4981 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
4982 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
4983 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
4984 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
4985 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
4986 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
4987 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
4991 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
4992 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
4995 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
4996 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
4997 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5001 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5002 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5003 Require a Version of Bison}.
5006 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5007 Specify the skeleton to use.
5009 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5010 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5011 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5012 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5014 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5015 file in the Bison installation directory.
5016 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5017 directory of the grammar file.
5018 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5021 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5022 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5023 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5024 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5025 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5026 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5027 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5030 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5031 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5032 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5033 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5034 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5035 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5036 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5039 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5040 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5041 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5045 The highest token number, plus one.
5047 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5049 The number of grammar rules,
5051 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5055 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5056 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5057 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5058 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5062 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5063 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5064 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5068 @node %define Summary
5069 @subsection %define Summary
5071 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5072 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5073 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5074 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5075 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5076 @code{%define} directive:
5078 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5079 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5080 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5081 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5083 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5084 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5085 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5086 to specifying @code{""}.
5088 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5089 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5090 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5093 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5094 @code{%define} accepts.
5096 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5097 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5101 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5103 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5104 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5106 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5108 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5109 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5112 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5113 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5114 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5115 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5116 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5117 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5121 @findex %define api.pure
5124 @item Language(s): C
5126 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5127 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5129 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5131 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5135 @findex %define api.push-pull
5138 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5140 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5141 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5142 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5143 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5145 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5147 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5150 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5152 @item lr.default-reductions
5153 @cindex default reductions
5154 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5155 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5156 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5161 @item Language(s): all
5163 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5164 contain default reductions.
5165 That is, in such a state, Bison selects the reduction with the largest
5166 lookahead set to be the default parser action and then removes that
5168 (The ability to specify where default reductions should be used is
5170 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5172 @item Accepted Values:
5175 This is the traditional Bison behavior. The main advantage is a
5176 significant decrease in the size of the parser tables. The
5177 disadvantage is that, when the generated parser encounters a
5178 syntactically unacceptable token, the parser might then perform
5179 unnecessary default reductions before it can detect the syntax error.
5180 Such delayed syntax error detection is usually inherent in LALR and
5181 IELR parser tables anyway due to LR state merging (@pxref{%define
5182 Summary,,lr.type}). Furthermore, the use of @code{%nonassoc} can
5183 contribute to delayed syntax error detection even in the case of
5184 canonical LR. As an experimental feature, delayed syntax error
5185 detection can be overcome in all cases by enabling LAC (@pxref{%define
5186 Summary,,parse.lac}, for details, including a discussion of the
5187 effects of delayed syntax error detection).
5189 @item @code{consistent}.
5190 @cindex consistent states
5191 A consistent state is a state that has only one possible action.
5192 If that action is a reduction, then the parser does not need to request
5193 a lookahead token from the scanner before performing that action.
5194 However, the parser recognizes the ability to ignore the lookahead token
5195 in this way only when such a reduction is encoded as a default
5197 Thus, if default reductions are permitted only in consistent states,
5198 then a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5199 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{needs} the
5200 syntactically unacceptable token from the scanner.
5202 @item @code{accepting}.
5203 @cindex accepting state
5204 In the accepting state, the default reduction is actually the accept
5206 In this case, a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5207 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{reaches} the
5208 syntactically unacceptable token in the input.
5209 That is, it does not perform any extra reductions.
5212 @item Default Value:
5214 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5215 @item @code{all} otherwise.
5219 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5221 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5222 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5225 @item Language(s): all
5227 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5228 remain in the parser tables.
5229 Bison considers a state to be unreachable if there exists no sequence of
5230 transitions from the start state to that state.
5231 A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison disables a
5232 shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
5233 Keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful for analysis purposes, but they
5234 are useless in the generated parser.
5236 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5238 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5244 @item Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in
5246 Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are irrelevant to
5247 your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are relevant.
5248 Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a parser table
5249 analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this behavior will likely
5250 remain in future Bison releases.
5252 @item While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
5253 remove other kinds of useless states.
5254 Specifically, when Bison disables reduce actions during conflict resolution,
5255 some goto actions may become useless, and thus some additional states may
5257 If Bison were to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those
5258 actions, it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those
5260 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
5264 @c ================================================== lr.type
5267 @findex %define lr.type
5273 @item Language(s): all
5275 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5277 (This feature is experimental.
5278 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5280 @item Accepted Values:
5283 While Bison generates LALR parser tables by default for
5284 historical reasons, IELR or canonical LR is almost
5285 always preferable for deterministic parsers.
5286 The trouble is that LALR parser tables can suffer from
5287 mysterious conflicts and thus may not accept the full set of sentences
5288 that IELR and canonical LR accept.
5289 @xref{Mystery Conflicts}, for details.
5290 However, there are at least two scenarios where LALR may be
5293 @cindex GLR with LALR
5294 @item When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you
5295 do not resolve any conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left}
5296 or @code{%prec}), then the parser explores all potential parses of any
5298 In this case, the use of LALR parser tables is guaranteed not
5299 to alter the language accepted by the parser.
5300 LALR parser tables are the smallest parser tables Bison can
5301 currently generate, so they may be preferable.
5302 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically,
5303 GLR begins to behave more like a deterministic parser, and so
5304 IELR and canonical LR can be helpful to avoid
5305 LALR's mysterious behavior.
5307 @item Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar
5308 with a major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or
5309 canonical LR parser table generation algorithm.
5310 LALR can be a quick way to generate parser tables in order to
5311 investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle differences
5312 from IELR and canonical LR.
5316 IELR is a minimal LR algorithm.
5317 That is, given any grammar (LR or non-LR),
5318 IELR and canonical LR always accept exactly the same
5320 However, as for LALR, the number of parser states is often an
5321 order of magnitude less for IELR than for canonical
5323 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states
5324 may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR
5325 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR is often an order
5326 of magnitude less as well.
5327 This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar.
5329 @item @code{canonical-lr}.
5330 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5331 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5334 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting
5335 means to explore a grammar because they have a property that IELR and
5336 LALR tables do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and
5337 default reductions are left disabled (@pxref{%define
5338 Summary,,lr.default-reductions}), then, for every left context of
5339 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
5340 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically
5341 acceptable in that left context. It might then seem that an advantage
5342 of canonical LR parsers in production is that, under the above
5343 constraints, they are guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as
5344 possible without performing any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR
5345 parsers using LAC (@pxref{%define Summary,,parse.lac}) are also able
5346 to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
5350 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5354 @findex %define namespace
5357 @item Languages(s): C++
5359 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5360 For example, if you specify:
5363 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5366 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5369 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5372 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5373 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5376 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5382 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5383 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5384 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5386 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5388 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5389 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5390 lexical analyzer function.
5391 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5392 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5393 lexical analyzer function.
5394 For example, if you specify:
5397 %define namespace "foo"
5398 %name-prefix "bar::"
5401 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5405 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5407 @findex %define parse.lac
5409 @cindex lookahead correction
5412 @item Languages(s): C
5414 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5415 syntax error handling.
5417 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer
5418 from a couple of problems upon encountering a syntax error. First, the
5419 parser might perform additional parser stack reductions before
5420 discovering the syntax error. Such reductions perform user semantic
5421 actions that are unexpected because they are based on an invalid token,
5422 and they cause error recovery to begin in a different syntactic context
5423 than the one in which the invalid token was encountered. Second, when
5424 verbose error messages are enabled (with @code{%error-verbose} or
5425 @code{#define YYERROR_VERBOSE}), the expected token list in the syntax
5426 error message can both contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
5428 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default
5429 reductions in inconsistent states, and parser state merging. Thus,
5430 IELR and LALR suffer the most. Canonical
5431 LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
5432 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
5434 LAC is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm that
5435 completely solves these problems for canonical LR,
5436 IELR, and LALR without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc},
5437 default reductions, or state mering. Conceptually, the mechanism is
5438 straight-forward. Whenever the parser fetches a new token from the
5439 scanner so that it can determine the next parser action, it immediately
5440 suspends normal parsing and performs an exploratory parse using a
5441 temporary copy of the normal parser state stack. During this
5442 exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic actions.
5443 If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing then
5444 resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
5445 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
5446 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
5447 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each
5448 token in the grammar.
5450 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a
5451 consistent parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not
5452 attempt to fetch a token from the scanner because no lookahead is
5453 needed to determine the next parser action. Thus, whether default
5454 reductions are enabled in consistent states (@pxref{%define
5455 Summary,,lr.default-reductions}) affects how soon the parser detects a
5456 syntax error: when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous token or when it
5457 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead. The latter
5458 behavior is probably more intuitive, so Bison currently provides no
5459 way to achieve the former behavior while default reductions are fully
5462 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether
5463 to enable default reductions in consistent states, canonical
5464 LR and IELR behave exactly the same for both
5465 syntactically acceptable and syntactically unacceptable input. While
5466 LALR still does not support the full language-recognition
5467 power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at
5468 least enables LALR's syntax error handling to correctly
5469 reflect LALR's language-recognition power.
5471 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice,
5472 it can have a performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must
5473 be performed twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions
5474 in consistent states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate
5475 an exploratory parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a
5476 parse are often the file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the
5477 scanner, and the user's semantic actions, but none of these are
5478 performed during the exploratory parse. Finally, the base of the
5479 temporary stack used during an exploratory parse is a pointer into the
5480 normal parser state stack so that the stack is never physically copied.
5481 In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC has proven
5482 insignificant for practical grammars.
5484 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5486 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5492 @subsection %code Summary
5496 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5497 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5498 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5499 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5500 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5501 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5502 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5503 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5505 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5506 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5507 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5508 in the parser implementation.
5510 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5511 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5512 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5514 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5517 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5518 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5519 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5520 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5521 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5522 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5526 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5527 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5528 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5531 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5532 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5536 @findex %code requires
5539 @item Language(s): C, C++
5541 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5542 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5543 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5544 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5545 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5547 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5548 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5553 @findex %code provides
5556 @item Language(s): C, C++
5558 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5559 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5561 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5562 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5570 @item Language(s): C, C++
5572 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5573 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5574 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5575 parser implementation file. For example:
5584 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5588 @findex %code imports
5591 @item Language(s): Java
5593 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5595 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5596 before any class definitions.
5600 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5601 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5602 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5603 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5606 @node Multiple Parsers
5607 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5609 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5610 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5611 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5612 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5614 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5615 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5616 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5617 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5618 names that do not conflict.
5620 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5621 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5622 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5623 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5624 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5625 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5626 @code{clex}, and so on.
5628 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5629 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5630 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5631 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5632 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5634 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5635 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5636 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5637 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5640 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5641 @cindex C-language interface
5644 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5645 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5646 functions that it needs to use.
5648 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5649 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5650 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5651 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5654 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5655 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5656 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5657 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5658 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5659 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5661 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5662 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5663 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5667 @node Parser Function
5668 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5671 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5672 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5673 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5674 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5675 without reading further.
5678 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5679 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5680 is due to end-of-input).
5682 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5683 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5686 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5689 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5694 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5699 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5702 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5703 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5704 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5706 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5707 @findex %parse-param
5708 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5709 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5710 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5711 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5712 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5715 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5718 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5719 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5723 Then call the parser like this:
5727 int nastiness, randomness;
5728 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5729 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5735 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5738 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5741 @node Push Parser Function
5742 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5743 @findex yypush_parse
5745 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5746 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5748 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5749 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5750 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5751 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5753 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5754 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5755 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5756 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5759 @node Pull Parser Function
5760 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5761 @findex yypull_parse
5763 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5764 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5766 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5767 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5768 declaration is used.
5769 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5771 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5772 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5775 @node Parser Create Function
5776 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5777 @findex yypstate_new
5779 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5780 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5782 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5783 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5784 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5785 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5787 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5788 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5789 or 0 if no memory was available.
5790 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5794 @node Parser Delete Function
5795 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5796 @findex yypstate_delete
5798 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5799 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5801 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5802 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5803 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5804 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5806 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5807 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5808 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5812 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5814 @cindex lexical analyzer
5816 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5817 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5818 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5819 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5821 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5822 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5823 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5824 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5825 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5826 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5827 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5831 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5832 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5833 of the token it has read.
5834 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5835 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5837 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5838 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5841 @node Calling Convention
5842 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5844 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5845 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5846 signifies end-of-input.
5848 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5849 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5850 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5851 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5853 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5854 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5855 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5856 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5857 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5858 signifies end-of-input.
5860 Here is an example showing these things:
5867 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5870 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5871 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5873 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5879 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5880 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5882 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5883 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5887 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5888 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5889 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5890 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5893 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5894 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5895 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5896 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5897 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5900 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5901 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5902 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5903 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5906 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5909 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5910 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5911 strlen (token_buffer))
5912 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5913 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5918 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5919 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5923 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5926 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5927 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5928 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5929 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5935 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5936 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5941 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5942 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5943 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5944 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5945 declaration looks like this:
5958 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5963 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5964 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5969 @node Token Locations
5970 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5973 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
5974 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the textual locations
5975 of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in
5976 @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual
5977 location of a token just parsed in the global variable @code{yylloc}.
5978 So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that variable.
5980 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5981 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5982 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5983 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5984 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5987 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5990 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5992 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5993 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5994 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5995 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5996 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5997 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6002 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6005 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6006 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6011 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6012 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6013 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6017 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
6018 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6021 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6023 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6024 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6030 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6031 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6032 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6036 results in the following signature:
6039 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6040 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6043 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
6046 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6047 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6051 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6054 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6055 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6058 @node Error Reporting
6059 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6060 @cindex error reporting function
6063 @cindex syntax error
6065 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6066 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6067 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6068 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6071 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6072 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6073 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6074 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6075 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6077 @findex %error-verbose
6078 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison
6079 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
6080 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
6081 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6083 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6084 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6085 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6086 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6087 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6088 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6090 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6091 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6092 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6094 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6099 yyerror (char const *s)
6103 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6108 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6109 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6110 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6111 immediately return 1.
6113 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6114 an access to the current location.
6115 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6116 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6117 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6121 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6122 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6125 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6128 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6129 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6132 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6133 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6134 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6135 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6139 /* Location tracking. */
6143 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6145 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6146 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6150 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6153 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6154 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6155 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6156 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6161 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6162 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6163 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6164 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6165 message is always passed last.
6167 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6168 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6169 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6173 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6174 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6175 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6176 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6178 @node Action Features
6179 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6180 @cindex summary, action features
6181 @cindex action features summary
6183 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6184 are useful in actions.
6186 @deffn {Variable} $$
6187 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6188 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6191 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6192 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6193 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6196 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6197 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6198 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6199 Types of Values in Actions}.
6202 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6203 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6204 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6205 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6208 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6209 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6210 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6213 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6214 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6215 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6218 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6220 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6221 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6222 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6223 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6224 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6225 going to be reduced by this rule.
6227 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6228 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6229 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6232 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6235 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6237 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6240 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6242 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6246 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6248 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6249 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6250 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6251 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6252 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6255 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6256 @findex YYRECOVERING
6257 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6258 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6259 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6262 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6263 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6264 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6265 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6266 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6268 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6271 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6272 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6274 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6276 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6279 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6280 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6281 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6282 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6285 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6286 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6287 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6288 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6290 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6293 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6294 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6295 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6296 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6298 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6303 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6304 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6305 Tracking Locations}.
6307 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6311 @c int first_line, last_line;
6312 @c int first_column, last_column;
6316 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6317 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6319 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6320 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6321 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6324 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6327 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6329 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6330 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6331 Tracking Locations}.
6334 @node Internationalization
6335 @section Parser Internationalization
6336 @cindex internationalization
6342 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6343 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6344 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6345 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6346 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6347 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6348 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6349 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6352 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6353 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6354 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6359 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6360 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6361 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6362 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6363 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6367 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6372 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6373 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6374 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6375 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6376 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6377 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6378 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6379 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6380 Bison-generated parser.
6383 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6384 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6385 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6389 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6392 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6393 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6394 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6398 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6399 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6400 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6403 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6409 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6413 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6419 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6420 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6421 @cindex algorithm of parser
6424 @cindex parser stack
6425 @cindex stack, parser
6427 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6428 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6429 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6431 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6432 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6435 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6436 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6437 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6438 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6439 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6440 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6441 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6443 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6450 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6451 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6454 expr: expr '*' expr;
6458 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6465 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6466 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6468 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6469 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6470 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6472 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6475 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6476 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6477 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6478 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6479 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6480 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6481 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
6482 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6483 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6487 @section Lookahead Tokens
6488 @cindex lookahead token
6490 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6491 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6492 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6493 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6494 token in order to decide what to do.
6496 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6497 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6498 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6499 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6500 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6501 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6502 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6505 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6506 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6507 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6524 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6525 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6526 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6527 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6528 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6530 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6531 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6532 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6533 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6534 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6535 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6540 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6541 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6542 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6543 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6546 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6548 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6549 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6550 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6552 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6553 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6559 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6565 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6566 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6568 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6569 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6570 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6571 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6574 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6575 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6576 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6577 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6578 contrast it with the other alternative.
6580 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6581 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6585 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6587 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6590 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6591 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6592 making these two inputs equivalent:
6595 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6597 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6600 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6601 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6602 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6603 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6604 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6605 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6606 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6607 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6609 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6610 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6611 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6612 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6614 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6616 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6617 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6618 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6623 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6635 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6644 @section Operator Precedence
6645 @cindex operator precedence
6646 @cindex precedence of operators
6648 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6649 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6650 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6651 shift and when to reduce.
6654 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6655 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6656 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6657 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6660 @node Why Precedence
6661 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6663 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6664 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6678 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6679 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6680 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6681 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6682 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6683 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6684 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6687 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6688 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6689 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6690 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6691 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6692 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6693 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6694 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6697 @cindex associativity
6698 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6699 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6700 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6701 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6702 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6703 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6704 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6705 makes right-associativity.
6707 @node Using Precedence
6708 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6713 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6714 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6715 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6716 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6717 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6718 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6719 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6722 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6723 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6724 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6725 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6726 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6728 @node Precedence Examples
6729 @subsection Precedence Examples
6731 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6739 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6740 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6741 declared with @code{'-'}:
6744 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6750 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6751 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6752 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6754 @node How Precedence
6755 @subsection How Precedence Works
6757 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6758 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6759 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6760 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6761 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6762 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6764 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6765 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6766 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6767 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6768 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6769 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6770 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6773 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6774 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6776 @node Contextual Precedence
6777 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6778 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6779 @cindex unary operator precedence
6780 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6781 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6784 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6785 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6786 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6787 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6789 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6790 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6791 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6792 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6795 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6796 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6797 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6798 modifier's syntax is:
6801 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6805 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6806 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6807 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6808 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6809 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6811 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6812 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6813 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6823 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6830 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6835 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6836 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6837 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6838 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6840 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6841 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6842 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6843 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6845 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6846 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6847 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6848 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6849 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6850 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6852 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6853 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6857 @section Parser States
6858 @cindex finite-state machine
6859 @cindex parser state
6860 @cindex state (of parser)
6862 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6863 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6864 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6865 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6866 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6868 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6869 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6870 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6871 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6872 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6873 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6874 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6875 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6878 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6879 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6880 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6883 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6884 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6885 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6887 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6888 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6891 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6892 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6895 sequence: /* empty */
6896 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6899 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6902 maybeword: /* empty */
6903 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6905 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6910 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6911 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6912 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6913 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6914 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6915 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6917 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6918 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6919 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6921 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6922 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6923 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6924 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6925 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6927 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6928 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6929 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6930 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6933 sequence: /* empty */
6934 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6936 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6940 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6943 sequence: /* empty */
6945 | sequence redirects
6952 redirects:/* empty */
6953 | redirects redirect
6958 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6959 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6960 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6961 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6962 in infinitely many ways!
6964 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6965 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6966 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6967 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6969 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6973 sequence: /* empty */
6979 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6983 sequence: /* empty */
6985 | sequence redirects
6993 | redirects redirect
6997 @node Mystery Conflicts
6998 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7000 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7008 def: param_spec return_spec ','
7012 | name_list ':' type
7030 | name ',' name_list
7035 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7036 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7037 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7038 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7042 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7044 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7045 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7046 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7048 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7049 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7050 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7051 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7052 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7053 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7054 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7056 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the
7057 non-LR(1) class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties
7058 beyond just mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix
7059 all these problems is to select a different parser table generation
7060 algorithm. Either IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the
7061 former is more efficient and easier to debug during development.
7062 @xref{%define Summary,,lr.type}, for details. (Bison's IELR(1) and
7063 canonical LR(1) implementations are experimental. More user feedback
7064 will help to stabilize them.)
7066 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7067 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7068 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7069 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7070 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7081 /* This rule is never used. */
7087 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7088 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7089 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7090 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7091 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7092 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7094 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7095 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7096 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7097 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7098 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7099 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7104 | name_list ':' type
7112 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7113 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7115 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7116 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7118 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7119 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7120 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7122 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7123 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7124 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7125 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7126 context-free languages.
7127 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7128 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7129 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7130 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7131 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7132 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
7133 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7134 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7136 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7137 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7138 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7139 parser uses the same basic
7140 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7141 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7142 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7143 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7145 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7146 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7147 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7148 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7149 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7151 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7152 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7153 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7154 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7155 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7156 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7157 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7158 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7159 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7160 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7161 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7164 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7165 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7166 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7167 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7168 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7169 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7170 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7171 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7172 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7173 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7174 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7175 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7177 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7178 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7179 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7181 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7182 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7183 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7184 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7185 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7186 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7187 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7188 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7189 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7190 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7191 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7192 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7194 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7197 @node Memory Management
7198 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7199 @cindex memory exhaustion
7200 @cindex memory management
7201 @cindex stack overflow
7202 @cindex parser stack overflow
7203 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7205 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7206 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7207 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7209 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7210 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7211 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7214 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7215 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7216 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7217 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7219 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7220 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7221 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7222 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7223 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7224 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7226 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7227 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7228 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7231 @cindex default stack limit
7232 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7236 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7237 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7238 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7239 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7240 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7242 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7244 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7245 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7246 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7247 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7248 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7249 this deficiency in a future release.
7251 @node Error Recovery
7252 @chapter Error Recovery
7253 @cindex error recovery
7254 @cindex recovery from errors
7256 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7257 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7258 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7261 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7262 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7263 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7264 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7265 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7266 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7267 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7270 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7271 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7272 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7273 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7274 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7275 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7280 stmnts: /* empty string */
7286 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7287 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7289 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7290 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7291 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7292 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7293 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7294 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7295 applicable in the ordinary way.
7297 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7298 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7299 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7300 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7301 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7302 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7303 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7304 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7305 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7306 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7307 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7308 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7310 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7311 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7312 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7315 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7318 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7319 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7320 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7321 spurious error message:
7324 primary: '(' expr ')'
7330 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7331 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7332 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7333 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7334 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7335 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7336 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7339 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7340 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7341 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7342 error messages resume.
7344 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7345 as any other rules can.
7348 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7349 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7350 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7351 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7354 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7355 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7356 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7358 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7360 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7361 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7362 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7363 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7364 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7366 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7367 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7368 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7369 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7372 @node Context Dependency
7373 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7375 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7376 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7377 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7378 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7382 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7383 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7384 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7385 error recovery rules must be written.
7388 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7389 neither clean nor robust.)
7391 @node Semantic Tokens
7392 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7394 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7395 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7401 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7402 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7403 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7405 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7406 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7407 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7408 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7409 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7411 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7412 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7413 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7414 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7415 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7416 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7417 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7419 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7420 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7421 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7422 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7426 typedef int foo, bar;
7429 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7430 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7435 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7436 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7438 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7439 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7440 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7441 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7442 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7446 declarator maybeasm '='
7448 | declarator maybeasm
7452 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7454 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7459 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7460 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7461 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7463 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7464 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7465 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7466 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7467 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7468 the syntactic context.
7470 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7471 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7472 @cindex lexical tie-in
7474 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7475 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7478 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7479 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7480 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7481 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7482 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7489 void yyerror (char const *);
7503 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7517 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7518 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7519 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7521 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7522 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7523 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7526 @node Tie-in Recovery
7527 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7529 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7530 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7532 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7533 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7534 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7535 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7539 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7546 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7547 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7548 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7549 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7550 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7552 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7554 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7555 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7556 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7568 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7569 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7570 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7571 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7573 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7574 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7575 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7576 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7577 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7578 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7581 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7584 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7586 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7587 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7588 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7589 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7590 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7591 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7594 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7595 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7599 @section Understanding Your Parser
7601 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7602 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7603 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7604 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7605 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7607 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7608 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7609 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7610 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
7611 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
7612 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
7613 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7615 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7632 @command{bison} reports:
7635 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7636 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7637 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7638 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7639 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7642 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7643 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7644 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7645 interpretation is the same.
7647 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7648 to precedence and/or associativity:
7651 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7652 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7653 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7658 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7661 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7662 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7663 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7664 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7668 @cindex token, useless
7669 @cindex useless token
7670 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7671 @cindex useless nonterminal
7672 @cindex rule, useless
7673 @cindex useless rule
7674 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7675 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7676 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7677 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7681 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7684 Terminals unused in grammar:
7687 Rules useless in grammar:
7692 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7698 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7699 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7700 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7701 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7702 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7707 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7710 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7720 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7725 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7730 @cindex pointed rule
7731 @cindex rule, pointed
7732 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
7733 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
7734 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
7735 that the input cursor.
7740 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7742 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7747 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
7748 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
7749 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
7750 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
7751 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
7752 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
7753 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
7754 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
7756 @cindex core, item set
7757 @cindex item set core
7758 @cindex kernel, item set
7759 @cindex item set core
7760 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
7761 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
7762 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
7763 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
7764 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
7765 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
7771 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7772 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
7773 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
7774 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
7775 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
7776 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
7778 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7789 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
7791 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
7795 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
7796 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
7797 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
7798 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
7803 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
7804 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7805 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7806 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7807 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7809 $ shift, and go to state 3
7810 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7811 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7812 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7813 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7817 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
7818 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
7819 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
7820 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
7821 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
7822 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
7824 @cindex accepting state
7825 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
7831 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
7837 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
7838 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
7840 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
7846 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
7848 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7854 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
7856 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7862 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
7864 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7870 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
7872 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7877 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
7883 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7884 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
7885 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7886 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7887 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7889 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7890 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7892 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7893 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7896 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
7897 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
7898 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
7899 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
7900 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
7901 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
7902 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
7903 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
7905 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
7906 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7907 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
7910 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
7911 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
7912 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
7913 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
7914 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
7915 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
7916 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
7917 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
7918 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
7919 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
7920 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
7921 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
7926 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7927 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
7928 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7929 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7930 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7932 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7933 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7935 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7936 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7939 The remaining states are similar:
7944 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7945 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7946 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
7947 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7948 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7950 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7951 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7953 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
7954 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
7958 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7959 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7960 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7961 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
7962 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7964 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7966 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
7967 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
7971 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7972 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7973 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7974 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7975 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
7977 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7978 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7979 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7980 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7982 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7983 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7984 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7985 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7986 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
7990 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
7991 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
7992 @samp{*}, but also because the
7993 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
7997 @section Tracing Your Parser
8000 @cindex tracing the parser
8002 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8003 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8005 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8008 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8010 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8011 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8012 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8013 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8016 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8017 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8018 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8020 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8022 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8023 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8024 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8025 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8027 the preferred solution.
8030 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8033 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8034 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8035 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8036 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8037 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8038 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8040 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8041 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8042 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8043 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8045 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8046 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8047 messages tell you these things:
8051 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8054 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8055 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8058 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8059 of the state stack afterward.
8062 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8063 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8064 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8065 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8066 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8067 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8068 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8069 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8070 grammar are to blame.
8072 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8073 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8074 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8075 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8076 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8079 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8080 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8081 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8082 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8083 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8084 value (from @code{yylval}).
8086 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8087 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8091 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8092 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8095 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8098 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8101 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8102 else if (type == NUM)
8103 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8107 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8110 @chapter Invoking Bison
8111 @cindex invoking Bison
8112 @cindex Bison invocation
8113 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8115 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8121 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8122 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8123 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8124 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8125 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8126 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8127 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8128 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8129 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8130 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8131 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8136 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8139 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8142 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8145 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8147 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8148 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8149 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8152 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8153 in alphabetical order by short options.
8154 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8155 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8159 @section Bison Options
8161 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8162 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8163 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8164 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8165 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8168 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8169 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8172 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8178 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8182 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8184 @item --print-localedir
8185 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8187 @item --print-datadir
8188 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8192 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8193 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8194 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8195 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8196 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8197 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8198 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8199 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8200 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8201 for compatibility with POSIX:
8208 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8209 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8210 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8211 this option is specified.
8213 @item -W [@var{category}]
8214 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8215 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8218 @item midrule-values
8219 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8221 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8224 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8227 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8228 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8231 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8234 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8235 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8236 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8240 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8245 Turn off all the warnings.
8247 Treat warnings as errors.
8250 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8251 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8252 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8261 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8262 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8263 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8265 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8266 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8267 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8268 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8269 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8270 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8271 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8275 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8278 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8279 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8280 definition for @var{name}.
8282 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8283 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8284 definitions for @var{name}.
8286 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8287 definitions for @var{name}.
8290 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8291 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8292 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8294 @item -L @var{language}
8295 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8296 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8297 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8298 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8299 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8301 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8305 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8307 @item -p @var{prefix}
8308 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8309 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8310 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8314 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8315 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8316 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8317 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8318 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8319 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8322 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8323 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8324 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8326 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8327 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8328 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8329 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8331 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8332 file in the Bison installation directory.
8333 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8334 current working directory.
8335 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8338 @itemx --token-table
8339 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8346 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8347 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8348 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8349 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8352 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8353 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8354 with other short options.
8356 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8357 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8358 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8359 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8361 @item -r @var{things}
8362 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8363 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8364 separated list of @var{things} among:
8368 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8372 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8373 each rule's lookahead set.
8376 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8377 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8380 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8381 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8385 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8386 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8387 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8390 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8391 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8393 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8394 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8396 @item -g [@var{file}]
8397 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8398 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8399 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8400 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8401 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8402 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8405 @item -x [@var{file}]
8406 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8407 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8408 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8409 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8411 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8412 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8415 @node Option Cross Key
8416 @section Option Cross Key
8418 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8419 the corresponding short option and directive.
8421 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8422 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8423 @include cross-options.texi
8427 @section Yacc Library
8429 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8430 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8431 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8432 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8433 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8434 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8435 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8437 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8438 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8441 int yyerror (char const *);
8444 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8445 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8446 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8452 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8454 @node Other Languages
8455 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8458 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8459 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8463 @section C++ Parsers
8466 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8467 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8468 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8469 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8470 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8471 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8474 @node C++ Bison Interface
8475 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8476 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8480 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8481 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8482 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8483 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8485 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8487 @findex %define namespace
8488 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
8489 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
8490 generated in the following files:
8495 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8496 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8499 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8502 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8503 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8504 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8505 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8506 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8508 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8509 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8510 @samp{%defines} directive.
8513 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8514 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8516 @node C++ Semantic Values
8517 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8518 @c - No objects in unions
8520 @c - Printer and destructor
8522 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8523 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8524 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8525 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8526 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8529 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8530 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8531 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8533 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8534 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8535 to such objects are allowed.
8538 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8539 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8540 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8544 @node C++ Location Values
8545 @subsection C++ Location Values
8549 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8551 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8552 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
8553 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
8554 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
8555 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
8557 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8558 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8559 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8560 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8561 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8564 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8565 The line, starting at 1.
8568 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8569 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8572 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8573 The column, starting at 0.
8576 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8577 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8580 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8581 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8582 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8583 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8584 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8587 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8588 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8589 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8590 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8593 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8594 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8595 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8598 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8599 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8600 Advance the @code{end} position.
8603 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8604 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8605 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8606 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8609 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8610 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8614 @node C++ Parser Interface
8615 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8616 @c - define parser_class_name
8618 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8620 @c - Reporting errors
8622 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8623 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8624 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8625 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8626 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8627 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8628 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8629 additional argument for its constructor.
8631 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
8632 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
8633 The types for semantics value and locations.
8636 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
8637 A structure that contains (only) the definition of the tokens as the
8638 @code{yytokentype} enumeration. To refer to the token @code{FOO}, the
8639 scanner should use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
8640 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
8641 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
8644 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8645 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8646 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8649 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8650 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8653 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8654 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8655 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8659 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8660 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8661 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8662 or nonzero, full tracing.
8665 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8666 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
8667 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
8668 described by @var{m}.
8672 @node C++ Scanner Interface
8673 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
8674 @c - prefix for yylex.
8675 @c - Pure interface to yylex
8678 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
8679 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
8680 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
8682 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8683 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8684 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
8685 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8689 @node A Complete C++ Example
8690 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
8692 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
8693 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
8694 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
8695 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
8696 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
8697 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
8698 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
8699 actually easier to interface with.
8702 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
8703 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
8704 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
8705 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
8706 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
8709 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8710 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8712 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
8713 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
8714 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
8715 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
8716 of valid input follows.
8720 seven := one + two * three
8724 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
8725 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
8727 @c - A place to store error messages
8728 @c - A place for the result
8730 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
8731 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
8732 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
8733 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
8734 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
8735 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
8736 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
8738 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
8739 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
8740 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
8743 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8745 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8746 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8749 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
8754 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
8755 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
8756 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
8757 factor both as follows.
8759 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8761 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
8763 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
8764 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
8765 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
8766 calcxx_driver& driver)
8767 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
8772 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
8775 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8777 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
8782 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
8784 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
8790 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
8791 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
8793 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8795 // Handling the scanner.
8798 bool trace_scanning;
8802 Similarly for the parser itself.
8804 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8806 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
8807 int parse (const std::string& f);
8813 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
8814 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
8815 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
8816 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
8818 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8821 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
8822 void error (const std::string& m);
8824 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8827 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
8828 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
8829 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
8830 messages and set error state.
8832 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
8834 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
8835 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
8837 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
8838 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
8840 variables["one"] = 1;
8841 variables["two"] = 2;
8844 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
8849 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
8853 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
8854 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
8855 int res = parser.parse ();
8861 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
8863 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
8867 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
8869 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
8874 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
8876 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
8877 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
8878 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
8879 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
8882 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8884 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
8885 %require "@value{VERSION}"
8887 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
8891 @findex %code requires
8892 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
8893 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
8894 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
8895 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
8896 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
8897 use a forward declaration of the driver.
8898 @xref{%code Summary}.
8900 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8904 class calcxx_driver;
8909 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
8910 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
8913 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8915 // The parsing context.
8916 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8917 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8921 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
8922 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
8923 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
8924 automatically propagated.
8926 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8931 // Initialize the initial location.
8932 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
8937 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
8940 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8947 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
8950 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8962 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
8963 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
8965 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8968 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
8974 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
8975 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
8976 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
8977 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
8980 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8982 %token END 0 "end of file"
8984 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
8985 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
8990 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
8993 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
8994 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8996 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
8997 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
8999 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
9003 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9005 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9009 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9011 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
9012 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
9015 "identifier" ":=" exp
9016 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9020 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9021 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9022 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9023 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9024 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9025 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9030 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9033 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9036 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9037 const std::string& m)
9039 driver.error (l, m);
9043 @node Calc++ Scanner
9044 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9046 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9047 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9049 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9051 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9056 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9057 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9059 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9060 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9061 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9062 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9066 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9067 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9068 not of token_type. */
9069 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9074 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9075 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9076 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9077 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9079 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9081 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9085 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9087 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9089 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9095 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9096 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9097 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9098 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9099 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9100 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9101 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9103 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9106 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9112 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9113 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9117 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9118 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9119 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9120 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9122 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9125 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9127 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9128 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9129 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9132 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9133 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9134 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9136 return token::NUMBER;
9138 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9139 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9144 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9145 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9147 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9150 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9152 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9155 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9157 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file);
9163 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9169 @node Calc++ Top Level
9170 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9172 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9174 @comment file: calc++.cc
9177 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9180 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9182 calcxx_driver driver;
9183 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9184 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9185 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9186 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9187 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9188 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9189 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9194 @section Java Parsers
9197 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9198 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9199 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9200 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9201 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9202 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9203 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9204 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9207 @node Java Bison Interface
9208 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9209 @c - %language "Java"
9211 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9212 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9214 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9215 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9217 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9218 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9219 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9220 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9221 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9222 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9223 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9224 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9225 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9226 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9228 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9230 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9231 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9232 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9233 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9236 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9237 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9239 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9240 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9242 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9243 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9245 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9246 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9247 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9248 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9249 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9250 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9251 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9252 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9253 access the token names and codes.
9255 @node Java Semantic Values
9256 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9257 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9259 @c - Printer and destructor
9261 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9262 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9263 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9266 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9267 %type <Integer> number
9270 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9271 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9272 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9273 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9274 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9277 %define stype "ASTNode"
9281 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9282 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9284 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9285 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9286 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9287 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9288 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9289 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9291 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9292 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9293 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9295 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9296 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9297 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9300 @node Java Location Values
9301 @subsection Java Location Values
9306 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser
9307 supports location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9308 An auxiliary user-defined class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point
9309 in a file; Bison itself defines a class representing a @dfn{location},
9310 a range composed of a pair of positions (possibly spanning several
9311 files). The location class is an inner class of the parser; the name
9312 is @code{Location} by default, and may also be renamed using
9313 @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9315 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9316 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9317 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9318 be supplied by the user.
9321 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9322 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9323 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9326 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9327 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9330 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9331 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9334 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9335 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9336 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9337 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9341 @node Java Parser Interface
9342 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9343 @c - define parser_class_name
9345 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9347 @c - Reporting errors
9349 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9350 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9351 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9352 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9353 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9355 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9356 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9357 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9358 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9359 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9360 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9362 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9363 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9364 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9365 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
9367 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9368 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9369 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9370 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9371 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9372 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9374 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
9375 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
9377 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9378 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9379 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9380 which initialize them automatically.
9382 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
9383 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
9385 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9386 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9387 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
9391 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9392 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9393 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
9395 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9396 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9397 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
9400 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9401 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9402 @code{false} otherwise.
9405 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9406 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9407 from a syntax error.
9408 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9411 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9412 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9413 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9417 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9418 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9419 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9420 or nonzero, full tracing.
9424 @node Java Scanner Interface
9425 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9428 @c - Lexer interface
9430 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9431 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9432 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9433 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
9435 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
9436 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
9437 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
9438 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
9441 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
9442 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
9443 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
9444 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
9447 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
9449 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9450 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
9451 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
9452 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
9455 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
9456 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9457 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
9460 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9461 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9464 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9465 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9466 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9467 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9468 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9470 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9471 "@var{class-name}".}
9474 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9475 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
9477 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9478 "@var{class-name}".}
9482 @node Java Action Features
9483 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9485 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9486 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9488 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9489 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9492 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9493 This may not be assigned to.
9494 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9497 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9498 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9499 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9503 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9504 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9505 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9506 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9507 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9508 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9511 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9512 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9513 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9514 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9516 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9520 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9521 This may not be assigned to.
9522 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9526 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9527 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9530 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
9531 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9532 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9535 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
9536 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9537 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9540 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
9541 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
9542 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9545 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9546 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9547 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9549 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9552 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9553 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9554 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9555 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9560 @node Java Differences
9561 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9563 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9564 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9565 section summarizes these differences.
9569 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9570 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9571 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9572 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9573 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9574 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9575 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9577 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9578 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9579 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9580 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9581 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9584 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9585 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9586 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9587 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9588 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9589 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9590 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9591 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9592 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9595 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9597 @item @code{%code imports}
9598 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9599 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9600 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9602 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9603 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9605 @item @code{%code lexer}
9606 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9607 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
9608 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
9612 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
9613 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
9614 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
9616 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
9617 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
9622 @node Java Declarations Summary
9623 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
9625 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
9626 meaning when used in a Java parser.
9628 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
9629 Generate a Java class for the parser.
9632 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9633 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
9634 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
9635 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
9636 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9639 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9640 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
9641 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
9642 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9645 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9646 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
9647 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
9648 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9651 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
9652 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
9653 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9656 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
9657 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
9659 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9662 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9663 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
9664 @xref{Java Differences}.
9667 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9668 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
9669 @xref{Java Differences}.
9672 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9673 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
9674 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9677 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
9678 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
9679 @emph{outside} the parser class.
9680 @xref{Java Differences}.
9683 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
9684 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
9685 @xref{Java Differences}.
9688 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
9689 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
9690 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9693 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
9694 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
9695 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9698 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
9699 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
9700 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9703 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
9704 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
9706 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9709 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9710 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
9711 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9712 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9715 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
9716 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
9717 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
9718 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
9719 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9722 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
9723 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
9724 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9727 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
9728 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
9729 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
9730 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9733 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
9734 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
9735 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
9736 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9739 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
9740 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
9741 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9744 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
9745 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
9746 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9749 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
9750 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
9751 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9754 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9755 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
9756 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
9757 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9761 @c ================================================= FAQ
9764 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
9765 @cindex frequently asked questions
9768 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
9772 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
9773 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
9774 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
9775 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
9776 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
9777 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
9778 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
9779 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
9780 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
9781 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
9782 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
9783 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
9786 @node Memory Exhausted
9787 @section Memory Exhausted
9790 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
9791 message. What can I do?
9794 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
9797 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
9798 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
9800 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
9801 following typical questions:
9804 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
9805 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
9806 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
9813 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
9814 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
9815 although I did specify @code{%define api.pure}.
9818 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
9819 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
9820 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
9821 demonstration, consider the following source file,
9822 @file{first-line.l}:
9830 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
9833 yyparse (char const *file)
9835 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
9838 /* One token only. */
9840 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
9855 If the file @file{input} contains
9863 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
9866 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
9867 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
9868 $ @kbd{./first-line}
9873 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
9874 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
9875 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
9876 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
9877 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
9878 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
9879 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
9880 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
9883 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
9884 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
9885 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
9886 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
9888 @node Strings are Destroyed
9889 @section Strings are Destroyed
9892 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
9893 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
9894 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
9897 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
9898 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
9899 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
9904 char *yylval = NULL;
9907 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
9913 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
9914 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
9915 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
9916 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
9921 If you compile and run this code, you get:
9924 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9925 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9926 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9932 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
9933 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
9934 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
9935 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
9936 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
9937 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
9940 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9941 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9942 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9947 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
9948 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
9951 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
9952 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
9955 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
9956 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
9957 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
9958 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
9959 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
9960 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
9961 execute simple instructions one after the others.
9963 @cindex abstract syntax tree
9965 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
9966 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
9967 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
9968 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
9969 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
9970 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
9973 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
9974 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
9977 @node Multiple start-symbols
9978 @section Multiple start-symbols
9981 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
9982 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
9983 multiple entry points.
9986 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
9987 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
9988 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
9989 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
9993 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
9995 start: START_FOO foo
9999 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10000 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10002 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10003 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10004 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10005 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10006 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10007 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10008 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10009 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10012 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10017 int t = start_token;
10022 /* @r{The rules.} */
10026 @node Secure? Conform?
10027 @section Secure? Conform?
10030 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10033 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10034 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10035 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10036 please send us a bug report.
10038 @node I can't build Bison
10039 @section I can't build Bison
10042 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10043 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10047 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10048 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10049 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10050 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10051 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10052 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10053 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10056 @node Where can I find help?
10057 @section Where can I find help?
10060 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10063 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10064 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10065 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10066 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10067 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10068 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10069 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10070 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10074 @section Bug Reports
10077 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10080 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10081 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10082 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10083 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10084 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10086 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10087 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10088 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10089 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10090 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10092 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10093 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10094 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10095 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10096 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10097 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10099 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10100 send a bug report just because you can not provide a fix.
10102 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10104 @node More Languages
10105 @section More Languages
10108 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10109 favorite language here}?
10112 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10113 languages; contributions are welcome.
10116 @section Beta Testing
10119 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10122 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10123 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10124 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10125 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10126 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10127 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10128 essentially halted.
10130 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10131 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10132 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10133 systems are especially welcome.
10135 @node Mailing Lists
10136 @section Mailing Lists
10139 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10142 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10144 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10146 @node Table of Symbols
10147 @appendix Bison Symbols
10148 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10149 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10151 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10152 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10153 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10156 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10157 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
10158 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10161 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10162 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10163 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10166 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10167 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10168 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10171 @deffn {Variable} $$
10172 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10176 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10177 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10178 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10181 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10182 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10186 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10187 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10191 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10192 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10193 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10194 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10197 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10198 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10199 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10200 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10201 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10205 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10206 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10209 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10210 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10214 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10215 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10218 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10219 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10220 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10223 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10224 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10227 This feature is experimental.
10228 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10231 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10234 @deffn {Directive} <>
10235 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10238 This feature is experimental.
10239 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10242 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10245 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10246 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10247 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10248 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10251 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10252 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10253 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
10254 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
10255 @xref{%code Summary}.
10258 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10259 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10263 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10264 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10265 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10270 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{define-variable}
10271 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} @var{value}
10272 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} "@var{value}"
10273 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
10276 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10277 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10278 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10281 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10282 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10283 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10286 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10287 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10288 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10291 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10292 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10293 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10297 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10298 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10299 used in the grammar.
10302 @deffn {Symbol} error
10303 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10304 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10305 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10306 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10307 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10308 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10309 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10310 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10313 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10314 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
10315 when @code{yyerror} is called.
10318 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10319 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10323 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10324 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10325 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10328 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10329 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10332 @deffn {Directive} %language
10333 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10334 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10337 @deffn {Directive} %left
10338 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
10339 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10342 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10343 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10344 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10348 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10349 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10350 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10351 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10352 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10355 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10356 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10360 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10361 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10362 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10367 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10368 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10369 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10372 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10373 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
10374 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10377 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10378 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
10379 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10382 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10383 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10384 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
10385 Function @code{yyparse}}.
10388 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10389 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10390 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10393 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10394 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
10395 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
10396 unreasonable usage.
10399 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
10400 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
10401 Require a Version of Bison}.
10404 @deffn {Directive} %right
10405 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
10406 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10409 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
10410 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
10411 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10414 @deffn {Directive} %start
10415 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
10419 @deffn {Directive} %token
10420 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
10421 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
10424 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
10425 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
10426 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10429 @deffn {Directive} %type
10430 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
10431 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
10434 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
10435 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
10436 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
10440 @deffn {Directive} %union
10441 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
10442 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
10445 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
10446 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
10447 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
10448 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
10449 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10451 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
10455 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
10456 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
10457 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
10458 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10460 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
10464 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
10465 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
10466 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10469 @deffn {Variable} yychar
10470 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10471 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10472 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10473 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10476 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10477 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10478 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10481 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10482 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10483 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10486 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10487 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10488 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10489 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10492 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10493 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10494 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10497 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10498 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
10499 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
10500 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
10501 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10503 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10507 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10508 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10509 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10510 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10513 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10514 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10515 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10516 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10517 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10518 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred.
10521 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10522 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10523 @xref{Memory Management}.
10526 @deffn {Function} yylex
10527 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10528 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10532 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10533 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10534 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10535 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10536 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10539 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10540 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10541 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10542 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10544 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10546 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10547 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10548 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10551 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10552 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10553 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10556 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10557 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10558 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10559 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10561 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10562 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10563 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10566 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10567 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10571 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10572 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10573 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10574 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10575 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10578 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10579 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10580 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10583 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10584 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10585 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
10586 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
10587 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
10588 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10589 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10592 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
10593 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10594 call this function to create a new parser.
10595 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
10596 @code{yypstate_new}}.
10597 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10598 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10601 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
10602 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10603 parse the rest of the input stream.
10604 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
10605 @code{yypull_parse}}.
10606 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10607 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10610 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
10611 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10612 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
10613 @code{yypush_parse}}.
10614 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10615 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10618 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
10619 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
10620 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
10621 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
10622 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10625 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
10626 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
10627 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
10628 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10631 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
10632 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
10633 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
10634 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
10635 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
10636 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
10637 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
10639 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
10640 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
10641 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
10642 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
10643 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
10644 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
10645 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
10648 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
10649 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
10650 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
10658 @item Accepting State
10659 A state whose only action is the accept action.
10660 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
10661 @xref{Understanding,,}.
10663 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
10664 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
10665 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
10666 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
10667 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10669 @item Consistent State
10670 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{%define
10671 Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
10673 @item Context-free grammars
10674 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
10675 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
10676 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
10677 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
10680 @item Default Reduction
10681 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
10682 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
10683 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to
10684 be the default reduction and removes that lookahead set.
10685 @xref{%define Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
10687 @item Dynamic allocation
10688 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
10689 compile time or on entry to a function.
10692 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
10693 character string of length zero.
10695 @item Finite-state stack machine
10696 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
10697 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
10698 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
10699 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
10700 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
10701 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10703 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
10704 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
10705 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
10706 deterministic parsing
10707 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
10708 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
10709 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
10713 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
10714 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
10715 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10718 A minimal LR(1) parser table generation algorithm. That is, given any
10719 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
10720 language recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
10721 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states
10722 is often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical
10723 LR(1)'s extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the
10724 case of non-LR(1) grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is
10725 often an order of magnitude less as well. This can significantly
10726 reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar. @xref{%define
10729 @item Infix operator
10730 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
10731 performs some operation.
10734 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
10736 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
10737 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
10738 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions,
10739 and the use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection
10740 results in unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery
10741 in the wrong syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected
10742 tokens in a verbose syntax error message. @xref{%define
10743 Summary,,parse.lac}.
10745 @item Language construct
10746 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
10747 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
10748 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10750 @item Left associativity
10751 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
10752 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
10753 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
10755 @item Left recursion
10756 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
10757 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10760 @item Left-to-right parsing
10761 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
10762 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10764 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
10765 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
10766 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
10768 @item Lexical tie-in
10769 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
10770 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
10772 @item Literal string token
10773 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
10775 @item Lookahead token
10776 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
10780 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
10781 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
10782 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
10785 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
10786 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
10788 @item Nonterminal symbol
10789 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
10790 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
10791 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
10794 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
10795 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
10798 @item Postfix operator
10799 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
10800 performs some operation.
10803 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
10804 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
10808 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
10809 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
10810 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
10812 @item Reverse polish notation
10813 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
10815 @item Right recursion
10816 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
10817 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10821 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
10822 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
10823 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
10826 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
10827 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
10828 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10830 @item Single-character literal
10831 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
10832 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
10835 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
10836 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
10837 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
10838 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
10841 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
10842 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
10843 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
10846 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
10847 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10850 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
10851 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
10852 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
10853 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
10855 @item Terminal symbol
10856 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
10857 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
10858 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10861 @node Copying This Manual
10862 @appendix Copying This Manual
10866 @unnumbered Bibliography
10870 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
10871 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
10872 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
10873 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
10875 @item [Denny 2010 May]
10876 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
10877 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
10878 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
10879 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
10881 @item [Denny 2010 November]
10882 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
10883 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
10884 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
10885 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
10887 @item [DeRemer 1982]
10888 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
10889 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
10890 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
10891 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
10894 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
10895 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
10896 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
10899 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
10900 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
10901 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
10902 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
10912 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
10913 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
10914 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
10915 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
10916 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
10917 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
10918 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
10919 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
10920 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
10921 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
10922 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
10923 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
10924 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
10925 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
10926 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
10927 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
10928 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
10929 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
10930 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
10931 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
10932 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
10933 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
10934 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
10935 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
10936 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
10937 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
10938 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
10939 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
10940 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
10941 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
10942 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
10943 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
10944 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
10945 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
10946 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
10947 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
10948 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
10949 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
10950 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
10951 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
10952 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
10953 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
10954 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
10955 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
10956 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
10957 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
10958 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
10959 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
10960 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
10961 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
10962 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
10963 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
10965 @c Local Variables:
10966 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"