1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
4 @documentencoding UTF-8
7 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
13 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
14 @c the smallbook format.
17 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
18 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
31 @comment %**end of header
35 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
36 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
38 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2013 Free Software
42 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
43 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
44 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
45 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
46 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
47 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
48 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
50 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
51 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
52 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
57 @dircategory Software development
59 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
64 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
65 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
67 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
70 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
73 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
74 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
75 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
76 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
79 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
93 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
94 how you can copy and share Bison.
97 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
98 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
101 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
102 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
103 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
104 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
105 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
106 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
107 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
108 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
109 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
110 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
111 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
112 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
113 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
114 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
115 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
118 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
120 The Concepts of Bison
122 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
123 as mathematical ideas.
124 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
125 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
126 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
127 the name of an identifier, etc.).
128 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
129 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
130 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
131 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
132 how is the output used?
133 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
134 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
138 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
139 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
140 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
141 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
142 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
146 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
147 a first example with no operator precedence.
148 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
149 Operator precedence is introduced.
150 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
151 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
152 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
153 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
154 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
156 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
158 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
159 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
160 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
161 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
162 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
163 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
164 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
166 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
168 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
169 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
170 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
172 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
174 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
175 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
176 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
178 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
180 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
181 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
182 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
184 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
188 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
189 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
190 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
191 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
192 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
193 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
194 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
195 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
197 Outline of a Bison Grammar
199 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
200 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
201 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
202 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
203 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
207 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
208 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
209 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
212 Defining Language Semantics
214 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
215 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
216 * Type Generation:: Generating the semantic value type.
217 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
218 * Structured Value Type:: Providing a structured semantic value type.
219 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
220 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
221 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
222 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
223 action in the middle of a rule.
227 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
228 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
229 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
233 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
234 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
235 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
239 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
240 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
241 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
242 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
243 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
244 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
245 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
246 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
247 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
248 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
249 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
250 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
251 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
252 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
254 Parser C-Language Interface
256 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
257 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
258 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
259 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
260 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
261 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
263 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
264 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
265 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
268 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
270 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
271 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
272 of the token it has read.
273 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
274 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
276 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
277 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
279 The Bison Parser Algorithm
281 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
282 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
283 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
284 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
285 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
286 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
287 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
288 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
289 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
290 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
294 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
295 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
296 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
297 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
298 * How Precedence:: How they work.
299 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
303 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
304 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
305 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
306 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
308 Handling Context Dependencies
310 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
311 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
312 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
313 error recovery rules must be written.
315 Debugging Your Parser
317 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
318 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
319 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
320 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
324 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
325 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
326 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
330 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
331 in alphabetical order by short options.
332 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
333 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
335 Parsers Written In Other Languages
337 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
338 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
342 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
343 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
344 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
345 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
346 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
347 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
351 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
352 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
353 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
355 A Complete C++ Example
357 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
358 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
359 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
360 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
361 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
365 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
366 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
367 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
368 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
369 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
370 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
371 * Java Push Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the a push parser
372 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
373 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
375 Frequently Asked Questions
377 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
378 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
379 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
380 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
381 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
382 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
383 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
384 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
385 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
386 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
387 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
388 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
392 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
398 @unnumbered Introduction
401 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
402 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
403 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
404 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
405 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
406 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
407 calculators to complex programming languages.
409 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
410 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
411 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
412 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
413 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
416 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
417 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
418 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
419 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
422 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
423 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
424 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
425 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
426 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
427 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
430 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
433 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
435 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
436 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
437 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
438 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
439 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
441 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
443 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
444 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
445 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
446 License to all of the Bison source code.
448 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
449 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
450 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
451 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
452 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
453 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
454 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
456 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
457 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
458 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
459 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
460 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
461 using the other GNU tools.
463 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
464 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
465 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
466 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
470 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
471 @include gpl-3.0.texi
474 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
476 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
477 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
478 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
481 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
482 as mathematical ideas.
483 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
484 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
485 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
486 the name of an identifier, etc.).
487 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
488 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
489 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
490 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
491 how is the output used?
492 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
493 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
496 @node Language and Grammar
497 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
499 @cindex context-free grammar
500 @cindex grammar, context-free
501 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
502 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
503 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
504 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
505 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
506 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
507 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
508 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
512 @cindex Backus-Naur form
513 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
514 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
515 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
516 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
517 essentially machine-readable BNF.
519 @cindex LALR grammars
520 @cindex IELR grammars
522 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
523 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
524 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
525 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
526 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
527 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
528 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
529 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
530 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
531 Construction}, to learn how.
534 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
535 @cindex ambiguous grammars
536 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
538 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
539 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
540 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
541 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
542 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
543 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
544 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
545 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
546 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
547 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
548 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
549 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
550 possible parses of any given string is finite.
552 @cindex symbols (abstract)
554 @cindex syntactic grouping
555 @cindex grouping, syntactic
556 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
557 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
558 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
559 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
560 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
561 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
562 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
564 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
565 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
566 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
567 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
568 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
569 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
570 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
571 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
572 lexicography, not grammar.)
574 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
577 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
578 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
579 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
580 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
581 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
582 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
583 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
586 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
587 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
588 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
589 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
590 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
591 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
592 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
593 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
595 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
596 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
597 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
598 reads informally as follows:
601 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
606 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
610 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
611 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
612 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
613 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
616 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
617 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
618 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
619 not the start symbol.
621 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
622 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
623 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
624 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
625 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
626 reports a syntax error.
628 @node Grammar in Bison
629 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
630 @cindex Bison grammar
631 @cindex grammar, Bison
632 @cindex formal grammar
634 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
635 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
636 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
638 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
639 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
640 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
642 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
643 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
644 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
645 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
646 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
647 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
648 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
651 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
652 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
653 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
654 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
656 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
657 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
659 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
660 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
661 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
662 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
666 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
670 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
672 @node Semantic Values
673 @section Semantic Values
674 @cindex semantic value
675 @cindex value, semantic
677 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
678 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
679 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
680 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
681 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
684 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
685 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
686 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
687 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
688 ,Defining Language Semantics},
691 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
692 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
693 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
694 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
697 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
698 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
699 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
700 need to have any semantic value.)
702 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
703 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
704 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
705 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
706 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
707 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
709 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
710 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
711 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
712 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
713 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
715 @node Semantic Actions
716 @section Semantic Actions
717 @cindex semantic actions
718 @cindex actions, semantic
720 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
721 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
722 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
723 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
726 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
727 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
728 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
729 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
730 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
731 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
732 newly recognized larger expression.
734 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
738 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
742 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
743 from the values of the two subexpressions.
746 @section Writing GLR Parsers
748 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
751 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
752 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
754 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
755 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
756 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
757 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
758 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
759 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
760 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
761 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
762 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
764 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
765 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
766 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
767 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
768 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
769 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
770 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
771 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
772 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
773 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
774 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
775 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
776 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
777 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
778 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
779 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
780 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
781 identical set of symbols.
783 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
784 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
785 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
786 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
787 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
788 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
789 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
790 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
791 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
795 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
796 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
797 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
798 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
799 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
802 @node Simple GLR Parsers
803 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
804 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
805 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
809 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
810 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
812 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
813 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
814 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
816 Consider a problem that
817 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
818 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
821 type subrange = lo .. hi;
822 type enum = (a, b, c);
826 The original language standard allows only numeric
827 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
828 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
829 10206) and many other
830 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
831 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
835 type subrange = (a) .. b;
839 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
840 type with only one value:
847 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
848 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
850 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
851 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
852 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
853 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
854 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
855 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
856 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
857 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
859 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
860 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
861 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
862 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
865 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
866 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
867 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
868 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
869 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
870 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
873 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
874 use the GLR algorithm.
875 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
876 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
877 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
878 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
879 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
880 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
881 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
882 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
883 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
885 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
886 reports a syntax error as usual.
888 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
889 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
890 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
891 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
892 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
894 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
895 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
896 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
897 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
898 The present example contains only one conflict between two
899 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
900 cannot be nested. So the number of
901 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
902 and the parsing time is still linear.
904 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
905 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
908 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
916 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
944 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
945 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
946 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
947 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
954 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
955 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
956 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
965 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
966 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
967 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
968 notice when the parser splits.
970 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
971 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
972 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
973 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
974 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
975 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
976 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
977 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
978 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
979 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
980 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
981 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
982 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
985 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
986 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
987 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
988 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
989 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
990 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
992 @node Merging GLR Parses
993 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
994 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
995 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
999 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
1001 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
1006 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1008 void yyerror (char const *);
1022 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1031 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1032 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1033 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1034 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1035 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1039 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1040 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1041 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1042 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1046 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1047 | '(' declarator ')'
1052 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1053 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1060 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1061 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1062 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1063 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1064 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1065 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1066 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1067 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1068 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1069 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1070 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1071 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1072 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1073 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1075 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1076 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1077 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1078 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1079 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1080 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1081 The parser therefore prints
1084 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1087 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1088 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1095 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1096 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1097 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1098 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1099 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1100 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1101 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1102 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1103 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1104 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1110 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1111 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1112 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1113 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1118 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1119 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1124 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1128 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1136 with an accompanying forward declaration
1137 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1141 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1142 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1147 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1148 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1151 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1154 Bison requires that all of the
1155 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1156 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1157 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1158 the offending merge.
1160 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1161 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1163 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1164 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1166 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1167 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1168 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1169 the associated reduction.
1170 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1171 action in a GLR parser.
1174 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1176 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1178 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1179 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1180 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1181 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1182 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1183 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1184 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1185 influence syntax analysis.
1186 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1189 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1190 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1191 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1192 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1193 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1194 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1195 future versions of Bison.
1196 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1197 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1198 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1200 @subsubsection YYERROR
1202 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1203 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1204 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1205 initiate error recovery.
1206 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1207 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1208 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1209 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1210 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1211 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1212 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1213 the parse that invoked the test.
1215 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1216 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1217 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1220 @node Semantic Predicates
1221 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1223 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1225 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1227 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1228 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1229 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1230 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1234 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1235 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1240 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1241 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1242 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1243 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1244 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1245 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1246 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1248 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1249 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1250 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1251 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1254 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1255 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1256 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1260 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1261 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1262 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1263 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1268 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1269 false). However, this
1270 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1271 have overlapping syntax.
1272 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1273 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1274 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1275 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1278 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1279 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1281 @node Compiler Requirements
1282 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1283 @cindex @code{inline}
1284 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1286 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1287 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1288 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1289 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1290 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1291 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1300 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1304 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1305 && ! defined inline)
1314 @cindex textual location
1315 @cindex location, textual
1317 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1318 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1319 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1320 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1322 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1323 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1324 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1325 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1328 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1329 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1330 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1333 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1334 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1335 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1336 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1337 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1338 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1339 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1342 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1343 @cindex Bison parser
1344 @cindex Bison utility
1345 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1348 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1349 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1350 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1351 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1352 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1353 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1354 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1357 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1358 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1359 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1362 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1363 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1364 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1365 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1366 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1367 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1368 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1370 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1371 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1372 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1373 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1374 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1375 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1376 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1377 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1378 C-Language Interface}.
1380 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1381 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1382 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1383 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1384 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1385 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1386 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1387 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1388 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1389 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1390 anything other than their usual meanings.
1392 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1393 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1394 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1395 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1396 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1397 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1398 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1399 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1400 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1403 @section Stages in Using Bison
1404 @cindex stages in using Bison
1407 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1408 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1412 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1413 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1414 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1415 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1416 sequence of C statements.
1419 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1420 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1421 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1422 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1425 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1428 Write error-reporting routines.
1431 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1432 must follow these steps:
1436 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1439 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1442 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1445 @node Grammar Layout
1446 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1447 @cindex grammar file
1449 @cindex format of grammar file
1450 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1452 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1453 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1460 @var{Bison declarations}
1469 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1470 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1472 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1473 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1474 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1475 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1476 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1477 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1479 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1480 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1481 semantic values of various symbols.
1483 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1486 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1487 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1488 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1492 @cindex simple examples
1493 @cindex examples, simple
1495 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1496 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1497 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1498 and a multi-function calculator. All
1499 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1501 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1502 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1503 source file to try them.
1506 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1507 a first example with no operator precedence.
1508 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1509 Operator precedence is introduced.
1510 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1511 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1512 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1513 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1514 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1518 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1519 @cindex reverse polish notation
1520 @cindex polish notation calculator
1521 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1522 @cindex calculator, simple
1524 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1525 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1526 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1527 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1529 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1530 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1533 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1534 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1535 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1536 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1537 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1538 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1539 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1542 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1543 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1545 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1546 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1548 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1550 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1557 void yyerror (char const *);
1561 %define api.value.type @{double@}
1564 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1567 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1568 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1570 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1571 function @code{pow}.
1573 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1574 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1575 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1576 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1579 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison about
1580 the tokens and their types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1581 Declarations Section}).
1583 The @code{%define} directive defines the variable @code{api.value.type},
1584 thus specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1585 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The Bison
1586 parser will use whatever type @code{api.value.type} is defined as; if you
1587 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1588 @samp{@{double@}}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1589 which is a floating point number. C code can use @code{YYSTYPE} to refer to
1590 the value @code{api.value.type}.
1592 Each terminal symbol that is not a single-character literal must be
1593 declared. (Single-character literals normally don't need to be declared.)
1594 In this example, all the arithmetic operators are designated by
1595 single-character literals, so the only terminal symbol that needs to be
1596 declared is @code{NUM}, the token type for numeric constants.
1599 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1601 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1603 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1615 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1622 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1623 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1624 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1625 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1626 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1627 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1633 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1634 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1635 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1636 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1637 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1640 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1641 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1642 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1644 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1645 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1646 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1647 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1648 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1649 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1652 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1653 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1654 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1658 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1660 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1669 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1670 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1671 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1672 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1673 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1675 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1676 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1677 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1678 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1679 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and to use the
1680 (optional) @code{%empty} directive, or to write the comment @samp{/* empty
1681 */} in it (@pxref{Empty Rules}).
1683 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1684 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1685 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1686 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1689 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1690 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1691 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1694 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1696 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1701 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1705 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1706 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1707 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1708 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1709 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1710 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1711 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1713 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1714 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1715 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1716 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1717 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1720 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1722 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1723 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1724 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1725 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1730 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1731 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1736 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1737 equally well have written them separately:
1741 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1742 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1746 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1747 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1748 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1749 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1750 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1751 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1752 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1753 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1755 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1756 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1757 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1759 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1760 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1764 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1768 means the same thing as this:
1773 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1779 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1782 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1783 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1784 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1786 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1787 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1788 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1789 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1791 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1793 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1794 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1795 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1796 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1798 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1799 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1800 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1801 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1802 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1803 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1804 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1805 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1806 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1808 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1809 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1810 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, whose value
1811 was defined at the beginning of the grammar via @samp{%define api.value.type
1812 @{double@}}; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1814 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1815 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1817 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1819 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1822 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1823 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1824 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1825 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1836 /* Skip white space. */
1837 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1841 /* Process numbers. */
1842 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1845 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1850 /* Return end-of-input. */
1853 /* Return a single char. */
1860 @subsection The Controlling Function
1861 @cindex controlling function
1862 @cindex main function in simple example
1864 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1865 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1866 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1868 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1880 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1881 @cindex error reporting routine
1883 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1884 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1885 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1886 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1887 here is the definition we will use:
1889 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1894 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1896 yyerror (char const *s)
1898 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1903 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1904 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1905 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1906 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1907 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1908 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1910 @node Rpcalc Generate
1911 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1912 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1914 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1915 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1916 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1917 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1918 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1919 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1921 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1922 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1924 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1925 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1932 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1933 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1934 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1935 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1936 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1937 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1938 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1940 @node Rpcalc Compile
1941 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1942 @cindex compiling the parser
1944 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1948 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1950 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1954 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1955 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1956 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1960 # @r{List files again.}
1962 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1966 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1967 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1973 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1975 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1978 @result{} -3.166666667
1979 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1981 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1986 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1987 @cindex infix notation calculator
1989 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1991 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1992 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1993 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1994 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1997 /* Infix notation calculator. */
2004 void yyerror (char const *);
2009 /* Bison declarations. */
2010 %define api.value.type @{double@}
2014 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2015 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2018 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2029 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2036 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2037 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2038 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2039 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2040 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2041 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2042 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2049 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2052 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2054 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2055 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2056 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2057 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2058 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2059 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2060 the associativity/precedence.)
2062 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2063 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2064 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2065 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2066 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2067 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2070 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2071 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2072 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2073 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2074 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2076 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2081 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2089 @node Simple Error Recovery
2090 @section Simple Error Recovery
2091 @cindex error recovery, simple
2093 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2094 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2095 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2096 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2097 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2098 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2100 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2101 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2102 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2108 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2109 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2114 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2115 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2116 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2117 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2118 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2119 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2120 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2121 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2124 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2125 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2126 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2127 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2128 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2129 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2132 @node Location Tracking Calc
2133 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2134 @cindex location tracking calculator
2135 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2136 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2138 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2139 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2140 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2141 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2145 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2146 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2147 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2150 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2151 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2153 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2154 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2157 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2162 void yyerror (char const *);
2165 /* Bison declarations. */
2166 %define api.value.type @{int@}
2174 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2178 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2179 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2180 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2181 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2182 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2183 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2184 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2188 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2190 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2191 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2192 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2193 from the new information.
2195 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2196 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2209 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2216 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2217 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2218 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2228 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2229 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2230 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2235 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2236 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2237 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2241 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2242 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2243 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2245 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2246 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2247 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2248 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2249 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2250 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2254 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2256 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2257 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2258 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2261 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2262 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2273 /* Skip white space. */
2274 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2275 ++yylloc.last_column;
2280 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2281 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2285 /* Process numbers. */
2289 ++yylloc.last_column;
2290 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2292 ++yylloc.last_column;
2293 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2300 /* Return end-of-input. */
2305 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2309 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2312 ++yylloc.last_column;
2318 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2319 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2320 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2321 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2323 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2324 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2325 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2326 controlling function:
2333 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2334 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2340 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2341 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2342 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2344 @node Multi-function Calc
2345 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2346 @cindex multi-function calculator
2347 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2348 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2350 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2351 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2352 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2353 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2354 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2356 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2357 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2358 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2359 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2360 functions whose syntax has this form:
2363 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2367 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2368 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2369 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2374 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2375 @result{} 3.1415926536
2379 @result{} 0.0000000000
2381 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2382 @result{} 2.3000000000
2384 @result{} 2.3000000000
2386 @result{} 0.8329091229
2387 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2388 @result{} 2.3000000000
2392 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2395 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2396 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2397 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2398 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2399 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2402 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2403 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2405 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2407 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2411 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2412 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2413 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of 'symrec'. */
2415 void yyerror (char const *);
2419 %define api.value.type union /* Generate YYSTYPE from these types: */
2420 %token <double> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2421 %token <symrec*> VAR FNCT /* Symbol table pointer: variable and function. */
2428 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2429 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2433 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2434 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2435 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2437 The special @code{union} value assigned to the @code{%define} variable
2438 @code{api.value.type} specifies that the symbols are defined with their data
2439 types. Bison will generate an appropriate definition of @code{YYSTYPE} to
2442 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a type
2443 with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols are
2444 @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their declarations are
2445 augmented with their data type (placed between angle brackets). For
2446 instance, values of @code{NUM} are stored in @code{double}.
2448 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal symbols,
2449 just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. Previously we did
2450 not use @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are normally
2451 declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But @code{exp} must be
2452 declared explicitly so we can specify its value type. @xref{Type Decl,
2453 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2456 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2458 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2459 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2460 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2462 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2464 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2475 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2476 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2483 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2484 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2485 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2486 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2487 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2488 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2489 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2490 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2491 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2492 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2495 /* End of grammar. */
2499 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2500 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2501 @cindex symbol table example
2503 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2504 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2505 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2506 requires some additional C functions for support.
2508 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2509 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2510 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2512 @comment file: calc.h
2515 /* Function type. */
2516 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2520 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2523 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2524 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2527 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2528 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2530 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2535 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2537 /* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2538 extern symrec *sym_table;
2540 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2541 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2545 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2548 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2554 double (*fnct) (double);
2559 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2572 /* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2577 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2583 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2585 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2586 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2592 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2593 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2595 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2596 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2597 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2598 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2599 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2600 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2602 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2604 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2605 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2609 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2611 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2612 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2613 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2614 ptr->type = sym_type;
2615 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2616 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2624 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2627 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2628 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2629 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2637 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2639 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2640 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2641 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2642 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2644 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2645 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2646 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2647 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2648 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2649 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2651 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2652 operators in @code{yylex}.
2654 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2664 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2665 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2673 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2674 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2677 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.NUM);
2684 Bison generated a definition of @code{YYSTYPE} with a member named
2685 @code{NUM} to store value of @code{NUM} symbols.
2687 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2690 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2693 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2694 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2695 static size_t length = 40;
2696 static char *symbuf = 0;
2701 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2707 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2711 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2713 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2715 /* Get another character. */
2720 while (isalnum (c));
2727 s = getsym (symbuf);
2729 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2730 *((symrec**) &yylval) = s;
2734 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2741 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2743 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2744 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2745 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2747 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2750 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2752 yyerror (char const *s)
2754 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2760 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2763 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2764 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2765 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2773 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2774 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2775 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2783 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2786 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2787 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2788 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2791 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2792 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2796 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2798 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2799 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2801 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2802 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2805 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2806 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2807 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2808 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2809 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2810 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2811 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2812 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2815 @node Grammar Outline
2816 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2819 @findex /* @dots{} */
2821 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2822 appropriate delimiters:
2829 @var{Bison declarations}
2838 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2839 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2843 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2844 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2845 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2846 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2847 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2851 @subsection The prologue
2852 @cindex declarations section
2854 @cindex declarations
2856 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2857 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2858 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2859 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2860 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2861 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2862 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2864 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2865 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2868 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2869 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2870 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2871 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2872 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2873 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2874 @code{%union} declaration.
2888 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2894 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2895 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2902 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2903 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2904 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2905 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2906 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2907 @code{#include} directives.
2909 @node Prologue Alternatives
2910 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2911 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2914 @findex %code requires
2915 @findex %code provides
2918 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2919 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2920 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2921 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2922 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2923 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2924 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2926 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2940 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2946 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2947 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2955 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2956 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2957 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2958 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2959 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2960 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2961 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2962 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2963 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2964 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2965 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2967 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2968 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2969 This behavior raises a few questions.
2970 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2971 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2972 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2973 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2974 This behavior is not intuitive.
2976 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2977 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2978 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2979 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2986 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2987 * in a '%code requires'; see below. */
2990 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2991 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3004 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3010 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3011 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3012 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3020 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
3021 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
3022 explicit which kind you intend.
3023 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
3025 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
3026 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
3027 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
3028 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
3029 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
3030 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
3031 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
3032 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
3033 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
3036 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3037 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3039 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3057 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3063 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3064 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3077 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3078 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3079 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3087 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3088 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3089 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3090 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3091 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3092 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3094 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3095 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3096 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3097 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3098 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3099 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3100 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3101 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3102 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3103 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3104 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3107 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3108 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3109 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3110 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3111 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3112 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3113 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3114 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3115 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3116 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3134 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3140 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3141 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3154 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3160 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3161 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3169 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3170 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3171 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3174 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3175 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3176 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3177 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3178 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3179 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3182 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3183 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3184 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3185 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3187 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3188 organize your grammar file.
3189 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3194 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3195 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3196 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3197 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3201 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3202 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3203 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3204 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3209 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3210 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3212 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3214 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3215 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3216 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3217 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3219 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3220 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3221 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3222 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3223 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3224 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3225 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3226 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3229 @node Bison Declarations
3230 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3231 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3232 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3234 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3235 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3236 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3237 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3240 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3241 @cindex grammar rules section
3242 @cindex rules section for grammar
3244 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3245 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3247 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3248 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3249 if it is the first thing in the file.
3252 @subsection The epilogue
3253 @cindex additional C code section
3255 @cindex C code, section for additional
3257 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3258 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3259 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3260 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3261 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3262 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3263 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3264 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3265 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3266 C-Language Interface}.
3268 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3269 from the grammar rules.
3271 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3272 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3273 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3274 of the grammar file.
3277 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3278 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3279 @cindex terminal symbol
3283 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3286 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3287 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3288 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3289 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3290 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3291 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3292 the symbol to stand for it.
3294 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3295 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3296 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3298 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3299 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3300 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3301 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3302 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3303 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3304 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3306 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3310 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3311 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3312 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3313 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3316 @cindex character token
3317 @cindex literal token
3318 @cindex single-character literal
3319 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3320 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3321 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3322 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3323 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3324 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3325 ,Operator Precedence}).
3327 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3328 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3329 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3330 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3331 your program will confuse other readers.
3333 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3334 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3335 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3336 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3337 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3338 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3342 @cindex string token
3343 @cindex literal string token
3344 @cindex multicharacter literal
3345 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3346 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3347 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3348 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3349 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3351 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3352 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3353 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3354 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3355 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3357 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3359 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3360 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3361 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3362 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3363 read your program will be confused.
3365 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3366 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3367 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3368 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3369 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3370 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3373 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3374 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3375 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3377 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3378 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3379 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3380 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3381 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3382 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3383 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3384 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3385 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3386 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3387 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3388 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3390 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3391 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3392 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3393 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3394 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3396 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3397 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3398 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3399 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3400 characters in the following C-language string:
3403 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3406 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3407 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3408 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3409 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3410 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3411 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3412 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3413 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3414 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3415 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3418 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3419 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3420 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3421 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3422 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3425 @section Grammar Rules
3427 A Bison grammar is a list of rules.
3430 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
3431 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
3432 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
3436 @subsection Syntax of Grammar Rules
3438 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3439 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3441 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3444 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3448 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3449 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3450 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3459 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3460 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3462 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3463 extra white space as you wish.
3465 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3466 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3469 @{@var{C statements}@}
3474 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3475 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3476 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3477 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3478 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3479 compiler can check it.
3481 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3482 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3483 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3484 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3485 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3486 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3487 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3488 character constants.
3490 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3494 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3495 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3500 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3501 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3508 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3511 @subsection Empty Rules
3516 A rule is said to be @dfn{empty} if its right-hand side (@var{components})
3517 is empty. It means that @var{result} can match the empty string. For
3518 example, here is how to define an optional semicolon:
3521 semicolon.opt: | ";";
3525 It is easy not to see an empty rule, especially when @code{|} is used. The
3526 @code{%empty} directive allows to make explicit that a rule is empty on
3538 Flagging a non-empty rule with @code{%empty} is an error. If run with
3539 @option{-Wempty-rule}, @command{bison} will report empty rules without
3540 @code{%empty}. Using @code{%empty} enables this warning, unless
3541 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
3543 The @code{%empty} directive is a Bison extension, it does not work with
3544 Yacc. To remain compatible with POSIX Yacc, it is customary to write a
3545 comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule with no components:
3558 @subsection Recursive Rules
3559 @cindex recursive rule
3560 @cindex rule, recursive
3562 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3563 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3564 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3565 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3566 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3577 @cindex left recursion
3578 @cindex right recursion
3580 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3581 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3582 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3594 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3595 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3596 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3597 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3598 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3599 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3600 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3603 @cindex mutual recursion
3604 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3605 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3606 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3615 | primary '+' primary
3628 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3632 @section Defining Language Semantics
3633 @cindex defining language semantics
3634 @cindex language semantics, defining
3636 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3637 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3638 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3640 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3641 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3642 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3643 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3646 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3647 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3648 * Type Generation:: Generating the semantic value type.
3649 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
3650 * Structured Value Type:: Providing a structured semantic value type.
3651 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3652 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3653 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3654 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3655 action in the middle of a rule.
3659 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3660 @cindex semantic value type
3661 @cindex value type, semantic
3662 @cindex data types of semantic values
3663 @cindex default data type
3665 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3666 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3667 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3668 Notation Calculator}).
3670 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3671 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3672 specify some other type, define the @code{%define} variable
3673 @code{api.value.type} like this:
3676 %define api.value.type @{double@}
3683 %define api.value.type @{struct semantic_type@}
3686 The value of @code{api.value.type} should be a type name that does not
3687 contain parentheses or square brackets.
3689 Alternatively, instead of relying of Bison's @code{%define} support, you may
3690 rely on the C/C++ preprocessor and define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like
3694 #define YYSTYPE double
3698 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3699 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}). If compatibility
3700 with POSIX Yacc matters to you, use this. Note however that Bison cannot
3701 know @code{YYSTYPE}'s value, not even whether it is defined, so there are
3702 services it cannot provide. Besides this works only for languages that have
3705 @node Multiple Types
3706 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3708 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3709 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3710 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3711 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3714 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3715 requires you to do two things:
3719 Specify the entire collection of possible data types. There are several
3723 let Bison compute the union type from the tags you assign to symbols;
3726 use the @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union
3730 define the @code{%define} variable @code{api.value.type} to be a union type
3731 whose members are the type tags (@pxref{Structured Value Type,, Providing a
3732 Structured Semantic Value Type});
3735 use a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a
3736 union type whose member names are the type tags.
3740 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3741 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3742 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3743 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3744 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3747 @node Type Generation
3748 @subsection Generating the Semantic Value Type
3749 @cindex declaring value types
3750 @cindex value types, declaring
3751 @findex %define api.value.type union
3753 The special value @code{union} of the @code{%define} variable
3754 @code{api.value.type} instructs Bison that the tags used with the
3755 @code{%token} and @code{%type} directives are genuine types, not names of
3756 members of @code{YYSTYPE}.
3761 %define api.value.type union
3762 %token <int> INT "integer"
3765 %token <char const *> ID "identifier"
3769 generates an appropriate value of @code{YYSTYPE} to support each symbol
3770 type. The name of the member of @code{YYSTYPE} for tokens than have a
3771 declared identifier @var{id} (such as @code{INT} and @code{ID} above, but
3772 not @code{'n'}) is @code{@var{id}}. The other symbols have unspecified
3773 names on which you should not depend; instead, relying on C casts to access
3774 the semantic value with the appropriate type:
3777 /* For an "integer". */
3781 /* For an 'n', also declared as int. */
3782 *((int*)&yylval) = 42;
3785 /* For an "identifier". */
3790 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.token.prefix} is defined
3791 (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}), then it is also used to prefix
3792 the union member names. For instance, with @samp{%define api.token.prefix
3796 /* For an "integer". */
3797 yylval.TOK_INT = 42;
3801 This Bison extension cannot work if @code{%yacc} (or
3802 @option{-y}/@option{--yacc}) is enabled, as POSIX mandates that Yacc
3803 generate tokens as macros (e.g., @samp{#define INT 258}, or @samp{#define
3806 This feature is new, and user feedback would be most welcome.
3808 A similar feature is provided for C++ that in addition overcomes C++
3809 limitations (that forbid non-trivial objects to be part of a @code{union}):
3810 @samp{%define api.value.type variant}, see @ref{C++ Variants}.
3813 @subsection The Union Declaration
3814 @cindex declaring value types
3815 @cindex value types, declaring
3818 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of possible
3819 data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is followed by
3820 braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a @code{union} in C@.
3834 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
3835 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
3836 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
3837 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3839 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the @code{%union}. For
3852 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
3853 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
3856 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple @code{%union}
3857 declarations; their contents are concatenated. However, only the first
3858 @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
3860 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
3861 a semicolon after the closing brace.
3863 @node Structured Value Type
3864 @subsection Providing a Structured Semantic Value Type
3865 @cindex declaring value types
3866 @cindex value types, declaring
3869 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
3870 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one @samp{<@var{type}>}
3871 tag. For example, you can put the following into a header file
3884 and then your grammar can use the following instead of @code{%union}:
3891 %define api.value.type @{union YYSTYPE@}
3897 Actually, you may also provide a @code{struct} rather that a @code{union},
3898 which may be handy if you want to track information for every symbol (such
3899 as preceding comments).
3901 The type you provide may even be structured and include pointers, in which
3902 case the type tags you provide may be composite, with @samp{.} and @samp{->}
3911 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3913 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3914 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3915 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3916 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3918 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3919 placed at any position in the rule;
3920 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3921 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3922 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3923 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3925 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3926 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3927 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3928 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3929 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3930 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3931 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3932 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3933 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3934 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3937 Here is a typical example:
3943 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3947 Or, in terms of named references:
3953 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3958 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3959 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3960 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3961 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3962 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3963 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3965 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3966 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3967 referred to as @code{$2}.
3969 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3970 references construct.
3972 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3973 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3974 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3975 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3976 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3979 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3982 @cindex default action
3983 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3984 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3985 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3986 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3987 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3988 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3990 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3991 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3992 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3993 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3994 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3999 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
4000 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
4006 %empty @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
4011 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
4012 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
4013 definition of @code{foo}.
4016 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
4017 any, from a semantic action.
4018 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
4019 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4022 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
4023 @cindex action data types
4024 @cindex data types in actions
4026 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
4027 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
4029 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
4030 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
4031 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
4032 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
4033 in the rule. In this example,
4039 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
4044 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
4045 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
4046 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
4047 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
4049 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
4050 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
4051 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
4063 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
4064 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
4066 @node Mid-Rule Actions
4067 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
4068 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4069 @cindex mid-rule actions
4071 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
4072 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
4073 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
4076 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
4077 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
4078 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
4081 @node Using Mid-Rule Actions
4082 @subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
4084 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
4085 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
4086 it is run before they are parsed.
4088 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
4089 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
4090 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
4091 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
4094 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
4095 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
4096 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
4097 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
4098 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
4099 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
4101 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
4102 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
4103 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
4104 at the end of the rule.
4106 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
4107 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
4108 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
4109 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
4110 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
4111 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
4118 $<context>$ = push_context ();
4119 declare_variable ($3);
4124 pop_context ($<context>5);
4130 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
4131 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
4132 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
4133 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
4134 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
4135 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
4138 Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
4139 component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
4140 and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
4147 $<context>let = push_context ();
4148 declare_variable ($3);
4153 pop_context ($<context>let);
4158 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
4159 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
4160 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
4161 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
4162 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
4165 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
4166 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
4167 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
4168 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
4169 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
4171 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
4172 Discarded Symbols}).
4173 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
4174 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
4176 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
4177 declare a destructor for that symbol:
4182 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
4200 $let = push_context ();
4201 declare_variable ($3);
4208 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
4209 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
4210 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
4212 @node Mid-Rule Action Translation
4213 @subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
4217 As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
4218 rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
4219 graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
4220 reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
4224 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
4231 $@@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4232 $@@2: %empty @{ c(); @};
4233 $@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4234 exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
4238 with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
4240 A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
4241 the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
4242 action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
4245 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4252 @@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4253 @@2: %empty @{ $$ = c(); @};
4254 $@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4255 exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
4258 There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
4259 action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
4260 final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
4261 final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
4262 @code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
4266 $ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
4268 mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
4269 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4273 mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
4274 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4280 @node Mid-Rule Conflicts
4281 @subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
4282 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
4283 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
4284 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
4285 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
4286 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
4292 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4293 | '@{' statements '@}'
4299 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
4304 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4305 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4308 | '@{' statements '@}'
4314 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
4315 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
4316 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
4317 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
4318 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
4319 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
4321 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
4322 actions into the two rules, like this:
4327 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4328 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4329 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4330 '@{' statements '@}'
4336 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
4337 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
4339 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
4340 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
4341 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
4346 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4347 declarations statements '@}'
4348 | '@{' statements '@}'
4354 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
4355 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
4357 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
4358 serves as a subroutine:
4363 %empty @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4369 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4370 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4376 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4377 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4380 @node Tracking Locations
4381 @section Tracking Locations
4383 @cindex textual location
4384 @cindex location, textual
4386 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4387 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4388 especially symbol locations.
4390 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4391 actions to take when rules are matched.
4394 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4395 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4396 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4400 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4401 @cindex data type of locations
4402 @cindex default location type
4404 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4405 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4407 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4408 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4409 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4410 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4414 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4423 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4424 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4425 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4426 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4427 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4429 @node Actions and Locations
4430 @subsection Actions and Locations
4431 @cindex location actions
4432 @cindex actions, location
4435 @vindex @@@var{name}
4436 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4438 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4439 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4441 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4442 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4443 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4444 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4445 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4448 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4449 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4450 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4451 references construct.
4453 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4461 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4462 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4463 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4464 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4470 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
4471 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4472 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4478 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4479 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4480 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4483 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4484 example above simply rewrites this way:
4497 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
4498 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4499 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4506 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4507 from a semantic action.
4508 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4509 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4511 @node Location Default Action
4512 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4513 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4514 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4516 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4517 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4518 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4519 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4520 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4521 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4522 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4523 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4526 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4527 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4529 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4530 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4531 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4532 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4533 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4534 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4535 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4536 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4537 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4538 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4540 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4544 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4548 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4549 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4550 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4551 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4555 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4556 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4557 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4558 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4565 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4566 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4567 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4569 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4573 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4574 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4577 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4578 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4579 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4580 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4583 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4584 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4585 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4586 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4589 @node Named References
4590 @section Named References
4591 @cindex named references
4593 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4594 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4595 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4596 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4597 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4598 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4600 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4601 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4602 used as named references. For example:
4606 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4607 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4612 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4616 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4617 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4622 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4628 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4631 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4634 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4639 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4640 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4641 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4644 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4645 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4650 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4651 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4652 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4655 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4656 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4662 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4663 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4666 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4667 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4671 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4672 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4673 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4674 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4675 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4676 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4677 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4679 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4683 @section Bison Declarations
4684 @cindex declarations, Bison
4685 @cindex Bison declarations
4687 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4688 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4691 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4692 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4693 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4694 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4696 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4697 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4698 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4699 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4702 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4703 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4704 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4705 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4706 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4707 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4708 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4709 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4710 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4711 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4712 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4713 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4714 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4715 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4719 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4720 @cindex version requirement
4721 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4724 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4725 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4729 %require "@var{version}"
4733 @subsection Token Type Names
4734 @cindex declaring token type names
4735 @cindex token type names, declaring
4736 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4739 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4745 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4746 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4747 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4749 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4750 @code{%precedence}, or
4751 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4752 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4755 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4756 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4757 following the token name:
4761 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4765 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4766 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4767 with each other or with normal characters.
4769 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4770 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4771 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4772 Than One Value Type}).
4778 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4782 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4786 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4787 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4788 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4795 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4796 equivalent literal string tokens:
4799 %token <operator> OR "||"
4800 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4805 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4806 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4807 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4808 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4809 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4810 the literal string instead of the token name.
4812 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4813 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4817 %token END 0 "end of file"
4820 @node Precedence Decl
4821 @subsection Operator Precedence
4822 @cindex precedence declarations
4823 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4824 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4826 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4827 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4828 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4829 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4830 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4831 operator precedence.
4833 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4834 @code{%token}: either
4837 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4844 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4847 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4848 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4849 all the @var{symbols}:
4853 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4854 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4855 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4856 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4857 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4858 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4859 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4860 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4861 considered a syntax error.
4863 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4864 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4865 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4868 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4869 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4870 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4871 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4872 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4875 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4876 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4877 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4878 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4883 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4884 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4888 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4889 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4890 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4894 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4895 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4896 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4899 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4903 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4904 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4905 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}). You
4906 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4907 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4910 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4911 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4912 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4913 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4915 @node Initial Action Decl
4916 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4917 @findex %initial-action
4919 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4920 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4923 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4924 @findex %initial-action
4925 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4926 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4927 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4928 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4931 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4934 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4937 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4942 @node Destructor Decl
4943 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4944 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4948 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4949 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4950 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4951 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4952 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4953 must discard the start symbol.
4955 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4956 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4957 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4958 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4960 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4961 symbol is automatically discarded.
4963 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4965 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4966 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4967 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4968 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4969 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4972 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4973 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4974 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4975 tag among @var{symbols}.
4976 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4977 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4978 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4980 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4981 (These default forms are experimental.
4982 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4984 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4985 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4986 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4987 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4989 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4990 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4991 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4992 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4993 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
5000 %union @{ char *string; @}
5001 %token <string> STRING1 STRING2
5002 %type <string> string1 string2
5003 %union @{ char character; @}
5004 %token <character> CHR
5005 %type <character> chr
5008 %destructor @{ @} <character>
5009 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
5010 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
5011 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
5015 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
5016 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
5017 to @code{free} by default.
5018 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
5019 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
5020 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
5021 @code{free} only once.
5022 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
5023 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
5025 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
5026 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
5027 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
5028 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
5029 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
5030 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
5031 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
5032 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
5033 reference it in your grammar.
5034 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
5035 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
5041 @cindex actions in mid-rule
5042 @cindex mid-rule actions
5043 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
5044 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
5045 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
5046 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
5047 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
5048 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
5049 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
5050 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
5054 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
5055 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
5056 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
5061 @cindex discarded symbols
5062 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
5066 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
5068 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
5070 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
5071 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
5073 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
5074 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
5077 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
5080 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
5081 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
5084 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
5085 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
5086 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
5090 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
5091 @cindex printing semantic values
5095 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
5096 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
5097 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
5098 know how semantic values should be formatted.
5100 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
5101 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
5102 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
5104 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
5107 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
5108 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
5109 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
5110 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
5111 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
5112 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
5113 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
5116 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
5117 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
5118 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
5119 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
5127 %union @{ char *string; @}
5128 %token <string> STRING1 STRING2
5129 %type <string> string1 string2
5130 %union @{ char character; @}
5131 %token <character> CHR
5132 %type <character> chr
5135 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
5136 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
5137 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
5138 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
5142 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
5143 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
5144 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
5145 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
5146 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
5147 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
5148 that has no semantic type tag. See also
5152 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
5153 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
5154 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
5155 @cindex warnings, preventing
5156 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
5160 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
5161 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
5162 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
5163 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
5164 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
5165 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
5167 The declaration looks like this:
5173 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
5174 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
5175 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
5176 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
5178 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
5179 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
5180 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
5181 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
5182 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
5183 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
5184 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
5190 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
5194 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
5195 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
5196 print the number of conflicts.
5199 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
5200 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
5201 go back to the beginning.
5204 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
5205 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
5206 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
5209 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
5210 but will keep silent otherwise.
5213 @subsection The Start-Symbol
5214 @cindex declaring the start symbol
5215 @cindex start symbol, declaring
5216 @cindex default start symbol
5219 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
5220 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
5221 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
5228 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
5229 @cindex reentrant parser
5231 @findex %define api.pure
5233 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
5234 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
5235 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
5236 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
5237 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
5238 program must be called only within interlocks.
5240 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
5241 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
5242 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
5243 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
5244 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
5246 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
5247 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
5248 reentrant. It looks like this:
5251 %define api.pure full
5254 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
5255 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
5256 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
5257 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
5258 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
5259 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
5260 of @code{yypstate} in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5261 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
5262 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
5264 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
5265 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
5269 @subsection A Push Parser
5272 @findex %define api.push-pull
5274 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5275 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5277 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
5278 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
5279 each time a new token is made available.
5281 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5282 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5283 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5284 within a certain time period.
5286 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5287 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5288 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5291 %define api.push-pull push
5294 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5295 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5296 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5297 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5298 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5301 %define api.pure full
5302 %define api.push-pull push
5305 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5306 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5307 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5308 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5310 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5311 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5312 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5313 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5314 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5315 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5316 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5317 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5321 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5323 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5324 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5325 yypstate_delete (ps);
5328 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5329 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5330 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5331 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5332 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5333 example would thus look like this:
5338 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5341 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5342 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5343 yypstate_delete (ps);
5346 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5347 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5349 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5350 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5351 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5352 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5353 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5354 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5355 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5356 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5357 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5358 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5359 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5360 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5361 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5362 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5363 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5364 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5365 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5369 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5370 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5371 yypstate_delete (ps);
5374 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5375 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5376 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5379 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5380 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5381 @cindex declaration summary
5382 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5384 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5386 @deffn {Directive} %union
5387 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5388 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}).
5391 @deffn {Directive} %token
5392 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5393 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5396 @deffn {Directive} %right
5397 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5398 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5401 @deffn {Directive} %left
5402 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5403 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5406 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5407 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5408 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5409 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5413 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5414 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5415 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5419 @deffn {Directive} %type
5420 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5421 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5424 @deffn {Directive} %start
5425 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5429 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5430 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5431 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5437 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5440 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5441 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5443 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5444 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5445 @xref{%code Summary}.
5448 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5449 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5451 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5454 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5455 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5456 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
5457 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5458 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5461 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5462 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5463 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5464 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5465 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5467 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5468 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5469 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5470 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5471 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5472 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5473 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5474 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5475 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5476 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5478 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5479 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5480 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5482 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5483 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5484 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5486 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5487 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5488 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5489 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5490 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5492 @findex %code requires
5493 @findex %code provides
5494 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5495 header also contains their code.
5496 @xref{%code Summary}.
5498 @cindex Header guard
5499 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5500 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5501 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5502 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5503 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5506 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix @{calc@}} and @samp{%defines
5507 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5509 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5510 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5512 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5516 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5517 Same as above, but save in the file @file{@var{defines-file}}.
5520 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5521 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5522 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5525 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5526 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5527 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5530 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5531 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5532 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5533 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5537 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5538 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5539 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5540 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5541 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5542 accurate syntax error messages.
5545 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5546 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5547 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5549 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5550 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5551 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5552 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5553 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5554 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5555 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5556 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5558 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5562 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5563 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5564 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5569 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5570 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5571 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5572 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5573 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5574 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5575 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5579 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5580 Generate the parser implementation in @file{@var{file}}.
5583 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5584 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5585 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5589 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5590 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5591 Require a Version of Bison}.
5594 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5595 Specify the skeleton to use.
5597 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5598 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5599 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5600 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5602 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5603 file in the Bison installation directory.
5604 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5605 directory of the grammar file.
5606 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5609 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5610 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5611 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5612 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5613 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5614 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5615 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5618 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5619 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5620 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5621 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5622 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5623 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5624 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5627 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5628 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5629 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5633 The highest token number, plus one.
5635 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5637 The number of grammar rules,
5639 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5643 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5644 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5645 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5646 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5650 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5651 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5652 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5656 @node %define Summary
5657 @subsection %define Summary
5659 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5660 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5661 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5662 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5663 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5664 @code{%define} directive:
5666 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5667 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5668 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
5669 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5670 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5672 The type of the values depend on the syntax. Braces denote value in the
5673 target language (e.g., a namespace, a type, etc.). Keyword values (no
5674 delimiters) denote finite choice (e.g., a variation of a feature). String
5675 values denote remaining cases (e.g., a file name).
5677 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define} multiple
5678 times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5681 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5682 @code{%define} accepts.
5684 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5685 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5689 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5691 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5692 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5694 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5696 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5697 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5700 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5701 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5702 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5703 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5704 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5705 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are described below.
5707 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5708 @deffn Directive {%define api.namespace} @{@var{namespace}@}
5710 @item Languages(s): C++
5712 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5713 For example, if you specify:
5716 %define api.namespace @{foo::bar@}
5719 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5722 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5725 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5726 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5729 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5735 @item Accepted Values:
5736 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5737 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5739 @item Default Value:
5740 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5741 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5742 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5743 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5744 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5745 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5746 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5749 %define api.namespace @{foo@}
5750 %name-prefix "bar::"
5753 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5759 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5760 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @{@var{type}@}
5763 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5765 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5766 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5768 @item Accepted Values: String
5770 @item Default Value: none
5773 Introduced in Bison 2.7 for C, C++ and Java. Introduced under the name
5774 @code{location_type} for C++ in Bison 2.5 and for Java in Bison 2.4.
5778 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5779 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.prefix} @{@var{prefix}@}
5782 @item Language(s): All
5784 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5785 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5787 @item Accepted Values: String
5789 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5791 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5795 @c ================================================== api.pure
5796 @deffn Directive {%define api.pure} @var{purity}
5799 @item Language(s): C
5801 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5802 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5804 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5806 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5807 the case for Boolean values.
5809 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5810 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5811 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5814 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5815 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5816 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5818 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5822 void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5823 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5826 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5827 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5830 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5833 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5834 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5836 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5839 the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5846 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5847 @deffn Directive {%define api.push-pull} @var{kind}
5850 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5852 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5853 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5854 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5855 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5857 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5859 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5866 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5867 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.constructor}
5874 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5875 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5876 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5878 @item Accepted Values:
5881 @item Default Value:
5884 introduced in Bison 3.0
5887 @c api.token.constructor
5890 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5891 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.prefix} @{@var{prefix}@}
5894 @item Languages(s): all
5897 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5898 target language. For instance
5901 %token FILE for ERROR
5902 %define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
5904 start: FILE for ERROR;
5908 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5909 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5910 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5911 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5912 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5913 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix.
5915 Bison also prefixes the generated member names of the semantic value union.
5916 @xref{Type Generation,, Generating the Semantic Value Type}, for more
5919 See @ref{Calc++ Parser} and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5921 @item Accepted Values:
5922 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5923 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5924 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5926 @item Default Value:
5929 introduced in Bison 3.0
5935 @c ================================================== api.value.type
5936 @deffn Directive {%define api.value.type} @var{support}
5937 @deffnx Directive {%define api.value.type} @{@var{type}@}
5943 The type for semantic values.
5945 @item Accepted Values:
5948 This grammar has no semantic value at all. This is not properly supported
5950 @item @samp{union-directive} (C, C++)
5951 The type is defined thanks to the @code{%union} directive. You don't have
5952 to define @code{api.value.type} in that case, using @code{%union} suffices.
5953 @xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
5956 %define api.value.type union-directive
5962 %token <ival> INT "integer"
5963 %token <sval> STR "string"
5966 @item @samp{union} (C, C++)
5967 The symbols are defined with type names, from which Bison will generate a
5968 @code{union}. For instance:
5970 %define api.value.type union
5971 %token <int> INT "integer"
5972 %token <char *> STR "string"
5974 This feature needs user feedback to stabilize. Note that most C++ objects
5975 cannot be stored in a @code{union}.
5977 @item @samp{variant} (C++)
5978 This is similar to @code{union}, but special storage techniques are used to
5979 allow any kind of C++ object to be used. For instance:
5981 %define api.value.type variant
5982 %token <int> INT "integer"
5983 %token <std::string> STR "string"
5985 This feature needs user feedback to stabilize.
5986 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5988 @item @samp{@{@var{type}@}}
5989 Use this @var{type} as semantic value.
6006 %define api.value.type @{struct my_value@}
6007 %token <u.ival> INT "integer"
6008 %token <u.sval> STR "string"
6012 @item Default Value:
6015 @code{%union} if @code{%union} is used, otherwise @dots{}
6017 @code{int} if type tags are used (i.e., @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} or
6018 @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} is used), otherwise @dots{}
6024 introduced in Bison 3.0. Was introduced for Java only in 2.3b as
6031 @c ================================================== location_type
6032 @deffn Directive {%define location_type}
6033 Obsoleted by @code{api.location.type} since Bison 2.7.
6037 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
6039 @deffn Directive {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{when}
6042 @item Language(s): all
6044 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
6045 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
6046 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
6047 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6049 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
6050 @item Default Value:
6052 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
6053 @item @code{most} otherwise.
6056 introduced as @code{lr.default-reductions} in 2.5, renamed as
6057 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 3.0.
6061 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
6063 @deffn Directive {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state}
6066 @item Language(s): all
6067 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
6068 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
6069 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6070 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6072 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
6073 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states} in 2.5, and as
6074 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 3.0.
6077 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
6079 @c ================================================== lr.type
6081 @deffn Directive {%define lr.type} @var{type}
6084 @item Language(s): all
6086 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
6087 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
6088 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6090 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
6092 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
6096 @c ================================================== namespace
6097 @deffn Directive %define namespace @{@var{namespace}@}
6098 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
6102 @c ================================================== parse.assert
6103 @deffn Directive {%define parse.assert}
6106 @item Languages(s): C++
6108 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
6109 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
6111 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
6113 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6115 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6121 @c ================================================== parse.error
6122 @deffn Directive {%define parse.error} @var{verbosity}
6127 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
6128 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
6130 @item Accepted Values:
6133 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
6135 @item @code{verbose}
6136 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
6137 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
6141 @item Default Value:
6148 @c ================================================== parse.lac
6149 @deffn Directive {%define parse.lac} @var{when}
6152 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
6154 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
6155 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
6156 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
6157 @item Default Value: @code{none}
6162 @c ================================================== parse.trace
6163 @deffn Directive {%define parse.trace}
6166 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
6168 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
6169 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
6171 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
6172 @samp{%define api.prefix @{@var{prefix}@}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
6173 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
6174 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
6177 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6179 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6185 @subsection %code Summary
6189 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
6190 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
6191 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
6192 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
6193 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
6194 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
6195 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
6196 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
6198 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
6199 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
6200 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
6201 in the parser implementation.
6203 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
6204 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
6205 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
6207 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
6210 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
6211 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
6212 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
6213 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
6214 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
6215 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
6219 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
6220 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
6221 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
6224 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
6225 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
6229 @findex %code requires
6232 @item Language(s): C, C++
6234 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
6235 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}. In other words, it's the best place to
6236 define types referenced in @code{%union} directives. If you use
6237 @code{#define} to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6238 definitions, then it is also the best place. However you should rather
6239 @code{%define} @code{api.value.type} and @code{api.location.type}.
6241 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
6242 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6247 @findex %code provides
6250 @item Language(s): C, C++
6252 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
6253 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
6255 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
6256 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
6264 @item Language(s): C, C++
6266 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
6267 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
6268 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
6269 parser implementation file. For example:
6278 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
6282 @findex %code imports
6285 @item Language(s): Java
6287 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
6289 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
6290 before any class definitions.
6294 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
6295 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
6296 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
6297 of the standard Bison skeletons.
6300 @node Multiple Parsers
6301 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
6303 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
6304 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
6305 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
6306 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
6307 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
6308 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
6309 exported in the generated header.
6311 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
6312 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
6313 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
6314 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
6315 @{@var{prefix}@}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@{@var{prefix}@}}, see
6316 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
6317 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
6318 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
6319 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
6321 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
6322 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
6323 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
6324 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
6325 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
6326 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
6327 specifically --- more about this below.
6329 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix @{c@}}, the names become
6330 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
6333 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
6334 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
6335 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
6336 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
6339 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
6340 #define yyparse cparse
6341 #define yylval clval
6347 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
6348 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
6349 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
6351 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
6355 extern CSTYPE clval;
6359 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
6360 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
6361 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
6366 # if defined YYDEBUG
6383 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
6384 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
6385 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
6388 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
6389 @cindex C-language interface
6392 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
6393 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
6394 functions that it needs to use.
6396 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
6397 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
6398 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
6399 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6402 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6403 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6404 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6405 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6406 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6407 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6409 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6410 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6411 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6415 @node Parser Function
6416 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6419 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6420 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6421 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6422 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6423 without reading further.
6426 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6427 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6428 is due to end-of-input).
6430 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6431 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6434 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6437 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6442 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6447 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6450 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6451 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6452 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6454 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6455 @findex %parse-param
6456 Declare that one or more
6457 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6458 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6459 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6460 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6463 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6466 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6470 Then call the parser like this:
6474 int nastiness, randomness;
6475 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6476 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6482 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6485 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6489 Using the following:
6491 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6494 Results in these signatures:
6496 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
6497 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6501 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
6502 and @code{%locations} are used:
6505 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
6506 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6509 @node Push Parser Function
6510 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6511 @findex yypush_parse
6513 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6514 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6516 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6517 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6518 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6519 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6521 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6522 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6523 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6524 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6527 @node Pull Parser Function
6528 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6529 @findex yypull_parse
6531 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6532 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6534 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6535 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6536 declaration is used.
6537 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6539 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6540 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6543 @node Parser Create Function
6544 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6545 @findex yypstate_new
6547 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6548 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6550 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6551 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6552 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6553 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6555 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6556 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6557 or 0 if no memory was available.
6558 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6562 @node Parser Delete Function
6563 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6564 @findex yypstate_delete
6566 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6567 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6569 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6570 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6571 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6572 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6574 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6575 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6576 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6580 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6582 @cindex lexical analyzer
6584 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6585 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6586 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6587 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6589 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6590 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6591 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6592 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6593 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6594 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6595 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6599 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6600 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6601 of the token it has read.
6602 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6603 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6605 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6606 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6609 @node Calling Convention
6610 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6612 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6613 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6614 signifies end-of-input.
6616 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6617 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6618 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6619 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6621 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6622 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6623 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6624 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6625 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6626 signifies end-of-input.
6628 Here is an example showing these things:
6635 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6638 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6639 return c; /* Assume token type for '+' is '+'. */
6641 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6647 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6648 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6650 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6651 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6655 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6656 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6657 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6658 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6661 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6662 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6663 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6664 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6665 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6668 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6669 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6670 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6671 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6674 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6677 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6678 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6679 strlen (token_buffer))
6680 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6681 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6686 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6687 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6691 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6694 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6695 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6696 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6697 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6703 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6704 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6709 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6710 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6711 Union Declaration}). So when you store a token's value, you
6712 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6713 declaration looks like this:
6726 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6731 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6732 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6737 @node Token Locations
6738 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6741 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6742 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6743 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6744 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6745 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6746 data in that variable.
6748 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6749 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6750 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6751 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6752 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6755 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6758 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6760 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6761 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6762 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6763 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6764 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6765 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6770 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6773 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6774 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6779 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6780 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6781 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6784 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6785 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6786 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6787 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6789 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6791 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6792 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6793 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6796 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6798 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6799 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6800 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6801 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6802 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6809 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6810 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6811 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6815 results in the following signatures:
6818 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6819 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6822 If @samp{%define api.pure full} is added:
6825 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6826 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6830 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure full} and @code{%locations} are
6834 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6835 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6836 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6839 @node Error Reporting
6840 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6841 @cindex error reporting function
6844 @cindex syntax error
6846 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6847 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6848 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6849 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6852 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6853 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6854 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6855 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6856 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6858 @findex %define parse.error
6859 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6860 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6861 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6862 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6863 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6865 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6866 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6867 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6868 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6869 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6870 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6872 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6873 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6874 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6876 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6881 yyerror (char const *s)
6885 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6890 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6891 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6892 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6893 immediately return 1.
6895 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6896 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6897 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6898 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6899 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6901 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6902 following signature:
6905 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6909 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6910 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6911 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6912 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6913 message is always passed last.
6915 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6916 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6917 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6921 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6922 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6923 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6924 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6926 @node Action Features
6927 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6928 @cindex summary, action features
6929 @cindex action features summary
6931 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6932 are useful in actions.
6934 @deffn {Variable} $$
6935 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6936 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6939 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6940 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6941 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6944 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6945 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6946 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6947 Types of Values in Actions}.
6950 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6951 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6952 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6953 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6956 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6957 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6958 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6961 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6962 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6963 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6966 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6968 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6969 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6970 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6971 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6972 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6973 going to be reduced by this rule.
6975 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6976 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6977 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6980 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6983 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6984 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6987 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6988 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6992 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6993 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6994 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6995 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6996 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6997 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
7000 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
7001 @findex YYRECOVERING
7002 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7003 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7004 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7007 @deffn {Variable} yychar
7008 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
7009 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
7010 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
7011 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7013 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
7016 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
7017 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
7019 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
7021 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7024 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
7025 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
7026 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
7027 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7030 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
7031 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
7032 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
7033 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7035 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
7038 @deffn {Variable} yylval
7039 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
7040 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
7041 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7043 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
7047 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
7048 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
7051 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
7055 @c int first_line, last_line;
7056 @c int first_column, last_column;
7060 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
7061 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
7063 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
7064 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
7065 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
7068 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
7071 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
7073 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
7074 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
7078 @node Internationalization
7079 @section Parser Internationalization
7080 @cindex internationalization
7086 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
7087 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
7088 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
7089 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
7090 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
7091 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
7092 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
7093 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
7096 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
7097 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
7098 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
7103 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
7104 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
7105 by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
7106 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
7107 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
7111 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
7116 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
7117 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
7118 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
7119 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
7120 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
7121 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
7122 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
7123 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
7124 Bison-generated parser.
7127 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
7128 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
7129 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
7133 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
7136 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
7137 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
7138 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
7142 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
7143 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
7144 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
7147 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7153 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7157 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
7163 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
7164 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
7165 @cindex algorithm of parser
7168 @cindex parser stack
7169 @cindex stack, parser
7171 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
7172 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
7173 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
7175 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
7176 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
7179 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
7180 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
7181 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
7182 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
7183 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
7184 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
7185 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
7187 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
7194 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
7195 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
7198 expr: expr '*' expr;
7202 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
7209 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
7210 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
7212 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
7213 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
7214 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
7216 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
7219 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
7220 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
7221 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
7222 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
7223 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
7224 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
7225 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
7226 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
7227 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
7228 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
7232 @section Lookahead Tokens
7233 @cindex lookahead token
7235 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
7236 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
7237 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
7238 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
7239 token in order to decide what to do.
7241 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
7242 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
7243 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
7244 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
7245 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
7246 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
7247 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
7250 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
7251 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
7252 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
7271 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
7272 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
7273 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
7274 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
7275 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
7277 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
7278 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
7279 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
7280 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
7281 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
7282 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
7287 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
7288 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
7289 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
7290 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7293 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
7295 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
7296 @cindex dangling @code{else}
7297 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
7299 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
7300 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
7305 "if" expr "then" stmt
7306 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7312 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
7313 specific keyword tokens.
7315 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
7316 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
7317 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
7318 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
7321 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
7322 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
7323 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
7324 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
7325 contrast it with the other alternative.
7327 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
7328 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
7332 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7334 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
7337 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
7338 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
7339 making these two inputs equivalent:
7342 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7344 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
7347 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
7348 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
7349 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
7350 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
7351 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
7352 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
7353 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
7354 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
7356 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
7357 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
7358 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
7359 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
7361 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
7362 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
7363 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
7364 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
7365 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
7368 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
7369 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
7370 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
7384 "if" expr "then" stmt
7385 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7395 @section Operator Precedence
7396 @cindex operator precedence
7397 @cindex precedence of operators
7399 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7400 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7401 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7402 shift and when to reduce.
7405 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7406 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7407 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7408 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7409 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7410 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7413 @node Why Precedence
7414 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7416 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7417 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7432 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7433 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7434 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7435 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7436 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7437 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7438 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7441 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7442 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7443 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7444 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7445 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7446 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7447 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7448 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7451 @cindex associativity
7452 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7453 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7454 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7455 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7456 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7457 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7458 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7459 makes right-associativity.
7461 @node Using Precedence
7462 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7468 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7469 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7470 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7471 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7472 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7473 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7474 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7476 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7477 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7478 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7479 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7480 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7481 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7482 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7483 what expected the grammar author.
7485 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7486 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7487 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7488 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7489 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7491 @node Precedence Only
7492 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7495 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7496 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7497 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7498 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7499 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7500 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7501 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7503 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7504 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7505 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7509 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7512 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7513 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7514 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7515 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7516 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7517 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7518 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7525 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7526 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7527 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7528 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7529 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7530 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7531 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7533 @node Precedence Examples
7534 @subsection Precedence Examples
7536 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7544 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7545 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7546 declared with @code{'-'}:
7549 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7554 @node How Precedence
7555 @subsection How Precedence Works
7557 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7558 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7559 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7560 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7561 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7562 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7564 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7565 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7566 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7567 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7568 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7569 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7570 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7573 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7574 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7577 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7579 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7580 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7581 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7582 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7584 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7585 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7586 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7587 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7588 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7589 instance as follows:
7598 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7599 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7600 use right associativity:
7603 %right "then" "else"
7606 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7607 ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7608 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7609 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7610 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7611 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7612 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7614 @node Contextual Precedence
7615 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7616 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7617 @cindex unary operator precedence
7618 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7619 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7622 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7623 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7624 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7625 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7627 The Bison precedence declarations
7628 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7629 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7630 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7633 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7634 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7635 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7636 modifier's syntax is:
7639 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7643 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7644 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7645 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7646 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7647 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7649 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7650 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7651 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7661 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7669 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7674 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7675 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7676 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7677 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7679 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7680 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7681 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7682 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7684 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7685 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7686 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7687 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7688 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7689 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7691 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7692 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7696 @section Parser States
7697 @cindex finite-state machine
7698 @cindex parser state
7699 @cindex state (of parser)
7701 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7702 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7703 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7704 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7705 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7707 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7708 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7709 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7710 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7711 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7712 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7713 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7714 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7717 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7718 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7719 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7722 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7723 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7724 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7726 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7727 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7730 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7731 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7736 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7738 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7744 %empty @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7745 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7751 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7752 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7753 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7754 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7755 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7756 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7758 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7759 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7760 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7762 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7763 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7764 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7765 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7766 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7768 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7769 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7770 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7771 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7776 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7777 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7782 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7789 | sequence redirects
7803 | redirects redirect
7809 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7810 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7811 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7812 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7813 in infinitely many ways!
7815 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7816 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7817 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7818 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7820 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7831 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7839 | sequence redirects
7853 | redirects redirect
7858 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7859 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7860 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7861 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7862 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7865 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7866 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7868 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7869 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7870 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7871 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7872 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7877 %precedence "sequence"
7882 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7883 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7895 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7896 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7899 %right "word" "redirect"
7904 | sequence word %prec "word"
7905 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7910 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7911 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7912 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7914 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7920 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7923 | name_list ':' type
7940 | name ',' name_list
7945 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7946 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7947 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7948 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7952 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7954 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7955 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7956 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7958 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7959 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7960 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7961 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7962 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7963 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7964 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7967 @cindex canonical LR
7968 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7969 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7970 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7971 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7972 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7973 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7974 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7975 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7977 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7978 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7979 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7980 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7981 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7989 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7994 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7995 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7996 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7997 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7998 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7999 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
8001 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
8002 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
8003 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
8004 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
8005 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
8006 rather than the one for @code{name}.
8012 | name_list ':' type
8024 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
8025 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
8030 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
8031 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
8032 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
8033 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
8034 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
8035 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
8036 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
8038 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
8039 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
8040 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
8041 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
8043 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
8044 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
8047 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
8048 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
8049 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
8050 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
8053 @node LR Table Construction
8054 @subsection LR Table Construction
8055 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
8058 @cindex canonical LR
8059 @findex %define lr.type
8061 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
8062 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
8063 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
8064 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
8067 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
8068 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
8069 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
8070 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
8073 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
8074 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
8075 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
8078 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
8079 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
8080 values for @var{type} are:
8083 @item @code{lalr} (default)
8085 @item @code{canonical-lr}
8088 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8092 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
8096 %define lr.type ielr
8099 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
8100 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
8101 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
8102 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
8103 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
8104 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
8105 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
8106 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
8107 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
8108 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
8110 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
8111 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
8112 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
8113 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
8119 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
8122 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
8124 @cindex GLR with LALR
8125 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
8126 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%precedence}),
8128 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
8129 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
8130 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
8131 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
8132 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
8133 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
8134 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
8135 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
8137 @item Malformed grammars.
8139 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
8140 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
8141 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
8142 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
8143 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
8148 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
8149 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
8150 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
8151 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
8152 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
8153 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
8154 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
8155 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
8156 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
8160 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8163 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
8164 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
8165 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
8166 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
8167 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
8168 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
8169 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
8170 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
8171 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
8172 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
8173 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
8174 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
8177 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
8178 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
8179 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
8181 @node Default Reductions
8182 @subsection Default Reductions
8183 @cindex default reductions
8184 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
8187 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
8188 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
8189 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
8190 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
8191 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
8193 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
8194 also affect the behavior of the parser:
8197 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
8199 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
8200 @cindex consistent states
8201 @cindex defaulted states
8202 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
8203 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
8204 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
8205 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
8206 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
8207 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
8208 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
8209 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
8210 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
8211 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
8212 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
8214 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
8215 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
8216 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
8217 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
8218 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
8219 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
8220 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
8221 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
8222 should already be considered closed.
8224 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
8226 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8227 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
8228 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
8229 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
8230 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
8231 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
8232 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
8233 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
8234 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
8238 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
8239 @c sentence from being rejected.
8240 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
8241 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
8242 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
8243 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
8244 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
8245 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
8248 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
8249 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
8250 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
8251 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
8252 because the accept action ends the parse.
8254 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
8255 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
8256 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
8257 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
8258 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
8259 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
8260 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
8261 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
8262 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
8263 split the parse instead.
8265 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
8266 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
8268 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{where}
8269 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
8270 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
8272 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
8273 @item @code{consistent}
8274 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
8277 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
8278 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8283 @findex %define parse.lac
8285 @cindex lookahead correction
8287 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
8288 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
8289 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
8290 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
8291 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
8292 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
8293 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
8294 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
8295 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
8297 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
8298 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
8299 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
8300 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
8301 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
8303 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
8304 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
8305 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
8306 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
8308 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
8309 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
8311 @item @code{none} (default)
8314 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8315 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
8319 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
8320 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
8321 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
8322 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
8323 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
8324 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
8325 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
8326 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
8327 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
8328 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
8331 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
8332 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
8333 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
8334 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
8335 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
8336 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
8337 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
8338 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
8339 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
8340 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
8342 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
8343 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
8344 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
8345 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
8346 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
8347 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
8348 language-recognition power.
8350 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
8353 @item Infinite parsing loops.
8355 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
8356 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
8357 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
8358 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
8361 @item Verbose error message limitations.
8363 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
8364 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
8365 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
8366 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
8367 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
8368 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
8372 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
8373 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
8374 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
8375 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
8376 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
8377 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
8378 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
8379 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
8380 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
8381 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
8382 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
8385 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
8386 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
8387 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
8389 @node Unreachable States
8390 @subsection Unreachable States
8391 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
8392 @cindex unreachable states
8394 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
8395 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
8396 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
8397 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
8399 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8400 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8401 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8402 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8404 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state} @var{value}
8405 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8406 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8409 There are a few caveats to consider:
8412 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8414 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8415 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8416 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8417 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8418 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8419 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8421 @item Other useless states.
8423 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8424 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8425 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8426 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8427 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8428 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8429 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8432 @node Generalized LR Parsing
8433 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8435 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8436 @cindex ambiguous grammars
8437 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
8439 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8440 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8441 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8442 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8443 context-free languages.
8444 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8445 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8446 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8447 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8448 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8449 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8450 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8451 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8453 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8454 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8455 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8456 parser uses the same basic
8457 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8458 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8459 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8460 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8462 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8463 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8464 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8465 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8466 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8468 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8469 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8470 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8471 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8472 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8473 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8474 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8475 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8476 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8477 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8478 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8481 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8482 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8483 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8484 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8485 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8486 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8487 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8488 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8489 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8490 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8491 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8492 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8494 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8495 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8496 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8498 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8499 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8500 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8501 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8502 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8503 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8504 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8505 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8506 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8507 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8508 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8509 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8511 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8514 @node Memory Management
8515 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8516 @cindex memory exhaustion
8517 @cindex memory management
8518 @cindex stack overflow
8519 @cindex parser stack overflow
8520 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8522 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8523 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8524 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8526 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8527 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8528 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8531 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8532 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8533 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8534 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8536 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8537 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8538 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8539 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8540 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8541 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8543 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8544 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8545 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8548 @cindex default stack limit
8549 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8553 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8554 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8555 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8556 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8557 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8559 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8561 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8562 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8563 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8564 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8565 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8566 non-trivial copy constructors.
8567 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8570 @node Error Recovery
8571 @chapter Error Recovery
8572 @cindex error recovery
8573 @cindex recovery from errors
8575 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8576 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8577 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8580 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8581 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8582 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8583 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8584 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8585 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8586 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8589 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8590 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8591 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8592 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8593 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8594 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8606 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8607 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8609 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8610 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8611 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8612 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8613 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8614 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8615 applicable in the ordinary way.
8617 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8618 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8619 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8620 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8621 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8622 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8623 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8624 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8625 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8626 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8627 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8628 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8630 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8631 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8632 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8635 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8638 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8639 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8640 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8641 spurious error message:
8651 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8652 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8653 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8654 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8655 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8656 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8657 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8660 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8661 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8662 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8663 error messages resume.
8665 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8666 as any other rules can.
8669 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8670 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8671 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8672 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8675 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8676 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8677 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8679 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8681 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8682 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8683 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8684 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8685 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8687 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8688 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8689 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8690 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8693 @node Context Dependency
8694 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8696 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8697 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8698 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8699 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8703 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8704 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8705 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8706 error recovery rules must be written.
8709 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8710 neither clean nor robust.)
8712 @node Semantic Tokens
8713 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8715 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8716 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8722 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8723 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8724 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8726 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8727 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8728 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8729 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8730 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8732 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8733 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8734 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8735 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8736 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8737 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8738 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8740 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8741 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8742 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8743 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8747 typedef int foo, bar;
8751 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8752 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8758 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8759 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8761 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8762 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8763 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8764 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8765 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8770 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8771 | declarator maybeasm
8777 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8778 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8784 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8785 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8786 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8788 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8789 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8790 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8791 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8792 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8793 the syntactic context.
8795 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8796 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8797 @cindex lexical tie-in
8799 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8800 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8803 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8804 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8805 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8806 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8807 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8814 void yyerror (char const *);
8823 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8824 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8825 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8839 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8840 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8841 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8843 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8844 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8845 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8848 @node Tie-in Recovery
8849 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8851 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8852 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8854 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8855 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8856 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8857 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8862 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8864 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8868 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8869 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8870 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8871 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8872 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8874 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8876 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8877 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8878 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8884 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8890 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8891 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8892 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8893 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8895 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8896 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8897 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8898 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8899 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8900 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8903 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8906 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8908 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8909 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8910 chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8912 The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8913 They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8914 automaton. There are several formats available:
8917 as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8920 as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8923 or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8924 @ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8927 The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8928 and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8932 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8933 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8934 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8935 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8939 @section Understanding Your Parser
8941 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8942 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8943 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8944 tune or simply fix a parser.
8946 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8947 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8948 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8949 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8950 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8951 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8952 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8954 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8976 @command{bison} reports:
8979 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8980 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8981 calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8982 calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8983 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8986 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8987 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8988 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8989 interpretation is the same.
8992 @cindex token, useless
8993 @cindex useless token
8994 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8995 @cindex useless nonterminal
8996 @cindex rule, useless
8997 @cindex useless rule
8998 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8999 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
9000 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
9001 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
9004 Nonterminals useless in grammar
9007 Terminals unused in grammar
9010 Rules useless in grammar
9015 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
9018 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9019 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9020 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9021 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
9025 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
9040 and reports the uses of the symbols:
9044 Terminals, with rules where they appear
9057 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
9062 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
9068 @cindex pointed rule
9069 @cindex rule, pointed
9070 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
9071 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
9072 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
9073 the location of the input cursor.
9078 0 $accept: . exp $end
9080 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9085 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
9086 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
9087 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
9088 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
9089 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
9090 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
9091 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
9092 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
9094 @cindex core, item set
9095 @cindex item set core
9096 @cindex kernel, item set
9097 @cindex item set core
9098 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
9099 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
9100 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
9101 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
9102 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
9103 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
9108 0 $accept: . exp $end
9109 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
9115 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9121 In the state 1@dots{}
9128 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
9132 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
9133 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
9134 State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
9135 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
9140 0 $accept: exp . $end
9141 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9146 $end shift, and go to state 3
9147 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9148 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9149 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9150 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9154 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
9155 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
9156 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
9157 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
9158 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
9161 @cindex accepting state
9162 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
9168 0 $accept: exp $end .
9174 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
9175 read), the parsing exits successfully.
9177 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
9183 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
9185 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9192 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
9194 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9201 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
9203 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9210 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
9212 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9217 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
9223 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9229 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9230 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9232 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9233 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9236 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
9237 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
9238 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
9239 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
9240 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
9241 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
9242 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
9243 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
9245 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
9246 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
9247 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
9250 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
9251 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
9252 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
9253 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
9254 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
9255 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
9256 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
9257 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
9258 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
9259 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
9260 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
9261 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
9266 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9267 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
9272 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9273 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9275 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9276 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9279 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
9280 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
9281 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
9282 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
9283 conflicts in the report:
9286 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
9287 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
9288 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
9292 The remaining states are similar:
9298 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9304 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9305 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9307 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
9308 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
9314 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9320 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9322 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
9323 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
9329 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9335 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9336 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9337 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9338 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9340 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9341 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9342 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9343 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9344 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
9349 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
9350 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
9351 also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
9353 Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
9354 XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
9356 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
9359 @section Visualizing Your Parser
9362 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
9363 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
9364 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
9365 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
9366 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
9367 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
9368 to help them understand LR parsers.
9370 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
9371 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
9372 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
9373 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
9374 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
9375 produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
9376 parser in multiple formats}).
9379 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
9390 The graphical output
9392 (see @ref{fig:graph})
9394 is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
9395 making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
9396 Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
9399 @float Figure,fig:graph
9400 @image{figs/example, 430pt}
9401 @caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
9405 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
9407 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
9408 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
9409 about transitions, for examples
9411 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
9412 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
9413 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
9418 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
9421 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
9423 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
9424 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
9432 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9436 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9438 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9440 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9442 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9443 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9444 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9445 action for the given state, there is no such label.
9447 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9454 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9455 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9458 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9460 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9462 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9463 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9464 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9465 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9466 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9468 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
9469 state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
9471 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9473 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9474 the name of the rule being jumped to.
9476 @c ================================================= XML
9479 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9482 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9483 (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
9484 with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9485 (@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
9486 option @option{--graph}. However,
9487 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9488 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9489 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9490 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9491 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9492 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9494 The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9495 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9496 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9497 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9498 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9499 file is @file{foo.xml}.
9501 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9502 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9506 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9508 Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
9510 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
9513 Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
9517 $ bison --print-datadir
9518 /usr/local/share/bison
9520 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
9523 @c ================================================= Tracing
9526 @section Tracing Your Parser
9529 @cindex tracing the parser
9531 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9532 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9535 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9536 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9537 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9540 @node Enabling Traces
9541 @subsection Enabling Traces
9542 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9545 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9547 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9548 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9549 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9550 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9553 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9554 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9555 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9556 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9557 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9559 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9560 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9561 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9562 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix @{c@}}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9563 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9565 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
9567 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9568 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9569 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9571 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9572 @findex %define parse.trace
9573 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9574 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9575 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9576 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9577 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9580 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9584 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9585 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9586 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9587 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9588 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9589 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9591 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9592 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9593 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9594 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9596 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9597 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9598 messages tell you these things:
9602 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9605 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9606 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9609 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9610 of the state stack afterward.
9613 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9614 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9615 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9616 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9617 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9618 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9619 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9620 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9621 grammar are to blame.
9623 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9624 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9625 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9626 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9627 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9630 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9632 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9633 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9634 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9635 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9636 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9637 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9639 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9640 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9641 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9644 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9646 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9648 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9651 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9652 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9653 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9654 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <double>;
9657 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9658 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9659 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9660 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9661 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9662 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9664 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9665 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9666 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9667 tag: since @code{<double>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp},
9668 this printer will be used for them.
9670 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9671 are sent onto standard error.
9674 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9677 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9678 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9684 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9685 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9686 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9687 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9689 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9691 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9692 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9697 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9698 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9699 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9703 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9704 Shifting token '(' ()
9706 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9707 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9709 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9710 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9711 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9717 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9718 @code{<double>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9719 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9722 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9723 Shifting token '-' ()
9725 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9726 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9728 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9729 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9730 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9731 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9733 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9734 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9735 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9737 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9738 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9744 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9745 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9748 Next token is token ')' ()
9749 Shifting token ')' ()
9751 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9752 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9754 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9756 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9762 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9766 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9767 Shifting token '\n' ()
9769 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9770 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9773 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9776 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9779 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9784 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9785 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9786 completion of the parsing.
9789 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9790 Shifting token $end ()
9793 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9794 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9798 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9799 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9802 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9803 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9804 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9806 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9808 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9809 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9810 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9812 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9815 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9816 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9820 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9821 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9822 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9825 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9828 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9831 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9832 else if (type == NUM)
9833 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9837 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9840 @chapter Invoking Bison
9841 @cindex invoking Bison
9842 @cindex Bison invocation
9843 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9845 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9851 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9852 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9853 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9854 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9855 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9856 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9857 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9858 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9859 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9860 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9861 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9866 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9869 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9872 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9875 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9877 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9878 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9879 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9882 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9883 in alphabetical order by short options.
9884 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9885 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9889 @section Bison Options
9891 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9892 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9893 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9894 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9895 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9898 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9899 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9902 @c Please, keep this ordered as in 'bison --help'.
9908 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9912 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9914 @item --print-localedir
9915 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9917 @item --print-datadir
9918 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9922 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9923 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9924 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9925 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9926 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9927 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9928 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9929 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9930 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9931 for compatibility with POSIX:
9938 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9939 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9940 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9941 this option is specified.
9943 @item -W [@var{category}]
9944 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9945 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9948 @item midrule-values
9949 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9951 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9954 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9957 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9958 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9961 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9964 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9965 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9966 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9969 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9973 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9974 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9975 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9976 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9977 no effect on the conflict report.
9980 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9984 Empty rules without @code{%empty}. @xref{Empty Rules}. Disabled by
9985 default, but enabled by uses of @code{%empty}, unless
9986 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
9989 Useless precedence and associativity directives. Disabled by default.
9991 Consider for instance the following grammar:
10020 @c cannot leave the location and the [-Wprecedence] for lack of
10024 warning: useless precedence and associativity for "="
10029 warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence
10034 warning: useless precedence for "("
10040 One would get the exact same parser with the following directives instead:
10050 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
10052 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
10053 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
10057 All the warnings except @code{yacc}.
10060 Turn off all the warnings.
10063 See @option{-Werror}, below.
10066 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
10067 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
10068 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
10071 Turn enabled warnings for every @var{category} into errors, unless they are
10072 explicitly disabled by @option{-Wno-error=@var{category}}.
10074 @item -Werror=@var{category}
10075 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors.
10077 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
10078 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
10080 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
10081 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
10082 S/R conflicts as errors.
10085 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
10086 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
10090 Do not turn enabled warnings for every @var{category} into errors, unless
10091 they are explicitly enabled by @option{-Werror=@var{category}}.
10093 @item -Wno-error=@var{category}
10094 Deactivate the error treatment for this @var{category}. However, the warning
10095 itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by this option.
10097 @item -f [@var{feature}]
10098 @itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
10099 Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
10102 @itemx diagnostics-show-caret
10103 Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
10104 @option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
10105 location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
10106 the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
10107 an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
10112 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10115 When invoked with @option{-fcaret} (or nothing), Bison will report:
10119 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
10120 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10124 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10125 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10129 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10130 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10134 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10135 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10139 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
10140 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10145 Whereas, when invoked with @option{-fno-caret}, Bison will only report:
10149 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: ‘$exp’
10150 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10151 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10152 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10153 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of ‘exp’ has no declared type
10157 This option is activated by default.
10168 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
10169 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
10170 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10172 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10173 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10174 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10175 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10176 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
10177 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
10178 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
10182 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
10185 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
10186 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
10187 definition for @var{name}.
10189 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
10190 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
10191 definitions for @var{name}.
10193 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
10194 definitions for @var{name}.
10197 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
10198 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
10199 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
10201 @item -L @var{language}
10202 @itemx --language=@var{language}
10203 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
10204 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
10205 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
10206 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
10209 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10211 @item -p @var{prefix}
10212 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
10213 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
10214 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
10215 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
10219 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
10220 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
10221 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
10222 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
10223 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
10224 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
10226 @item -S @var{file}
10227 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
10228 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
10229 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
10231 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
10232 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
10233 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
10234 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
10236 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
10237 file in the Bison installation directory.
10238 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
10239 current working directory.
10240 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
10243 @itemx --token-table
10244 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10251 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
10252 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10253 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
10254 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10257 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
10258 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
10259 with other short options.
10261 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
10262 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
10263 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
10264 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10266 @item -r @var{things}
10267 @itemx --report=@var{things}
10268 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
10269 separated list of @var{things} among:
10273 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
10274 parser's automaton.
10277 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10278 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
10281 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10282 each rule's lookahead set.
10285 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
10286 precedence and associativity directives.
10289 Enable all the items.
10292 Do not generate the report.
10295 @item --report-file=@var{file}
10296 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
10300 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10301 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
10302 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10304 @item -o @var{file}
10305 @itemx --output=@var{file}
10306 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
10308 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
10309 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
10311 @item -g [@var{file}]
10312 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
10313 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
10314 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
10315 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
10316 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10317 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10320 @item -x [@var{file}]
10321 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
10322 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
10323 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10324 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10326 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
10327 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10330 @node Option Cross Key
10331 @section Option Cross Key
10333 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
10334 the corresponding short option and directive.
10336 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
10337 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
10338 @include cross-options.texi
10342 @section Yacc Library
10344 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
10345 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
10346 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
10347 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
10348 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
10349 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
10350 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
10352 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
10353 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
10356 int yyerror (char const *);
10359 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
10360 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
10361 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
10364 int yyparse (void);
10367 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
10369 @node Other Languages
10370 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
10373 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
10374 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
10378 @section C++ Parsers
10381 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
10382 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
10383 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
10384 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10385 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
10386 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
10389 @node C++ Bison Interface
10390 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
10391 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
10393 @c - initial action
10395 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
10396 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
10397 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
10398 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10400 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
10402 @findex %define api.namespace
10403 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
10404 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
10405 in the following files:
10410 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
10411 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
10412 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
10416 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
10418 @item @var{file}.hh
10419 @itemx @var{file}.cc
10420 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
10421 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
10422 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
10423 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
10425 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
10426 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
10427 @samp{%defines} directive.
10430 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
10431 for a complete and accurate documentation.
10433 @node C++ Semantic Values
10434 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
10435 @c - No objects in unions
10437 @c - Printer and destructor
10439 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
10440 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
10441 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
10442 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
10445 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
10446 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
10450 @subsubsection C++ Unions
10452 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
10453 Union Declaration}. In particular it produces a genuine
10454 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
10457 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
10458 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
10459 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
10461 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
10462 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
10463 to such objects are allowed.
10466 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
10467 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
10468 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
10472 @subsubsection C++ Variants
10474 Bison provides a @emph{variant} based implementation of semantic values for
10475 C++. This alleviates all the limitations reported in the previous section,
10476 and in particular, object types can be used without pointers.
10478 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
10479 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
10480 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
10481 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
10483 For instance, instead of
10491 %token <ival> NUMBER;
10492 %token <sval> STRING;
10499 %token <int> NUMBER;
10500 %token <std::string> STRING;
10503 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
10504 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
10507 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
10508 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
10509 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
10511 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
10512 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
10513 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
10514 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
10515 eventually, destroyed.
10517 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
10518 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
10519 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
10522 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
10523 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
10527 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
10528 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
10529 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
10530 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
10531 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
10532 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
10533 that would be duplicating the information.
10535 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
10536 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
10537 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
10538 (the current implementation of) variants:
10541 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
10542 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
10543 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
10544 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
10545 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
10546 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
10549 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
10552 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
10553 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
10555 @node C++ Location Values
10556 @subsection C++ Location Values
10558 @c - class Position
10559 @c - class Location
10560 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10562 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10563 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10565 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10566 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10567 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10568 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10569 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10572 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10573 genuine code only the latter is used.
10576 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
10577 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10578 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10582 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10584 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10585 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10586 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10590 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10591 Reset the position to the given values.
10594 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10595 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10596 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10597 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10598 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10601 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10602 The line, starting at 1.
10605 @deftypemethod {position} {void} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10606 If @var{height} is not null, advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the
10607 column number. The resulting line number cannot be less than 1.
10610 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10611 The column, starting at 1.
10614 @deftypemethod {position} {void} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10615 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number. The
10616 resulting column number cannot be less than 1.
10619 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10620 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10621 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10622 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10623 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10626 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10627 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10628 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10631 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10632 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10633 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10634 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10638 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10640 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10641 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10644 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10645 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10646 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10649 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10650 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10653 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10654 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10655 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10658 @deftypemethod {location} {void} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10659 @deftypemethodx {location} {void} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10660 Forwarded to the @code{end} position.
10663 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10664 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10665 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10666 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator- (int @var{width})
10667 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator-= (int @var{width})
10668 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10671 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10672 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10675 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10676 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10677 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10681 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10682 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10683 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10686 @node User Defined Location Type
10687 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10688 @findex %define api.location.type
10690 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10691 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10694 %define api.location.type @{@var{LocationType}@}
10697 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10700 it must be copyable;
10703 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10704 parser basically runs
10706 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10707 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10710 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10713 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10714 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10717 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10718 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10723 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10724 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10725 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10726 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10731 %define api.namespace @{master::@}
10735 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10736 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10739 %define api.location.type @{master::location@}
10740 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10743 @node C++ Parser Interface
10744 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10745 @c - define parser_class_name
10747 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10749 @c - Reporting errors
10751 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10752 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10753 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10754 @samp{%define parser_class_name @{@var{name}@}}. The interface of
10755 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10756 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10757 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10758 additional argument for its constructor.
10760 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10761 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10762 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10765 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10766 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10767 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10768 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10769 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10770 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10773 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10774 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10775 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10776 equivalent with first
10777 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10778 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10779 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10780 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10781 function invoked from the user action.
10784 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10785 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10786 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10789 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10790 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10791 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10794 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10795 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10798 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10799 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10800 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10803 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10804 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10805 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10809 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10810 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10811 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10812 or nonzero, full tracing.
10815 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10816 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10817 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10818 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10819 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10824 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10825 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10826 @c - prefix for yylex.
10827 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10830 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10831 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10832 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10833 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10836 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10837 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10840 @node Split Symbols
10841 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10843 The interface is as follows.
10845 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10846 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10847 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10848 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10849 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10852 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10853 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10855 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10859 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10860 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10863 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10864 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10868 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10869 initialized. So the code would look like:
10873 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10874 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10877 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10878 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10887 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10888 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10891 yylval.build(yytext);
10892 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10897 @node Complete Symbols
10898 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10900 If you specified both @code{%define api.value.type variant} and
10901 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10902 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10903 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10904 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10905 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10907 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10908 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10909 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10910 the @var{location}.
10913 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10914 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10915 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10916 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10918 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10920 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10921 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10922 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10923 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10924 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10925 also pass the @var{location}.
10928 For instance, given the following declarations:
10931 %define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
10932 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10933 %token <int> INTEGER;
10938 Bison generates the following functions:
10941 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10942 const location_type& l);
10943 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10944 const location_type& loc);
10945 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10949 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10952 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10953 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10954 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10957 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10958 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10960 @node A Complete C++ Example
10961 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10963 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10964 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10965 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10966 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10967 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10968 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10969 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10970 actually easier to interface with.
10973 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10974 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10975 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10976 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10977 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10980 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10981 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10983 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10984 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10985 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10986 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10987 of valid input follows.
10991 seven := one + two * three
10995 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10996 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10998 @c - A place to store error messages
10999 @c - A place for the result
11001 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
11002 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
11003 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
11004 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
11005 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
11006 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
11007 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
11009 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
11010 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
11011 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
11014 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11016 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11017 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11020 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11025 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
11026 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
11027 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
11028 factor both as follows.
11030 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11032 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
11034 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
11035 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
11040 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
11043 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11045 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
11046 class calcxx_driver
11050 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
11052 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
11058 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
11059 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
11061 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11063 // Handling the scanner.
11064 void scan_begin ();
11066 bool trace_scanning;
11070 Similarly for the parser itself.
11072 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11074 // Run the parser on file F.
11075 // Return 0 on success.
11076 int parse (const std::string& f);
11077 // The name of the file being parsed.
11078 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
11080 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
11081 bool trace_parsing;
11085 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
11086 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
11087 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
11088 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
11090 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11093 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
11094 void error (const std::string& m);
11096 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11099 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
11100 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
11101 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
11102 messages and set error state.
11104 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
11106 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11107 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
11109 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
11110 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
11112 variables["one"] = 1;
11113 variables["two"] = 2;
11116 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
11121 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
11125 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
11126 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
11127 int res = parser.parse ();
11133 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
11135 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
11139 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
11141 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
11145 @node Calc++ Parser
11146 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
11148 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
11149 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
11150 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
11151 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
11154 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11156 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
11157 %require "@value{VERSION}"
11159 %define parser_class_name @{calcxx_parser@}
11163 @findex %define api.token.constructor
11164 @findex %define api.value.type variant
11165 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
11166 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
11167 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
11168 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
11170 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11172 %define api.token.constructor
11173 %define api.value.type variant
11174 %define parse.assert
11178 @findex %code requires
11179 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
11180 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
11181 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
11182 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
11183 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
11184 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
11185 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
11187 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11192 class calcxx_driver;
11197 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
11198 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
11201 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11203 // The parsing context.
11204 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
11208 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
11209 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
11210 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
11213 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11218 // Initialize the initial location.
11219 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
11224 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
11225 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
11228 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11230 %define parse.trace
11231 %define parse.error verbose
11236 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
11237 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
11239 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11243 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11249 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
11250 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
11251 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
11252 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
11253 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
11255 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11257 %define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
11259 END 0 "end of file"
11271 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
11272 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
11275 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11277 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
11278 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
11283 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
11284 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
11285 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
11286 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
11288 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11290 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
11294 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
11295 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
11297 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11301 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
11305 | assignments assignment @{@};
11308 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
11313 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
11314 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
11315 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
11316 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
11317 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
11318 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
11319 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
11324 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
11327 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11330 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
11331 const std::string& m)
11333 driver.error (l, m);
11337 @node Calc++ Scanner
11338 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
11340 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
11341 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
11343 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11345 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
11347 # include <climits>
11348 # include <cstdlib>
11350 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11351 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11353 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
11354 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
11355 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
11356 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
11358 # define yywrap() 1
11360 // The location of the current token.
11361 static yy::location loc;
11366 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
11367 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
11368 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
11369 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
11371 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11373 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug noinput
11377 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
11379 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11381 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
11387 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
11388 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
11389 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
11390 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
11391 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
11392 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
11393 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
11395 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11399 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
11400 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
11406 // Code run each time yylex is called.
11410 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
11411 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
11415 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
11417 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11419 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
11420 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
11421 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
11422 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
11423 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
11424 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
11425 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
11430 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
11431 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
11432 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
11433 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
11436 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
11437 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
11438 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
11443 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
11444 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
11446 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11450 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
11452 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
11453 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
11455 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
11457 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
11458 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11465 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
11472 @node Calc++ Top Level
11473 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
11475 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
11477 @comment file: calc++.cc
11479 #include <iostream>
11480 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11484 main (int argc, char *argv[])
11487 calcxx_driver driver;
11488 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
11489 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
11490 driver.trace_parsing = true;
11491 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
11492 driver.trace_scanning = true;
11493 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
11494 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
11503 @section Java Parsers
11506 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
11507 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
11508 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
11509 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
11510 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
11511 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
11512 * Java Push Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the a push parser
11513 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11514 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
11517 @node Java Bison Interface
11518 @subsection Java Bison Interface
11519 @c - %language "Java"
11521 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
11522 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11524 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
11525 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
11527 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11528 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
11529 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
11530 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
11531 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
11532 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
11533 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
11534 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
11535 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
11536 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
11538 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
11540 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
11541 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
11542 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
11543 and @code{%define api.pure} directives do nothing when used in Java.
11545 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
11546 api.push-pull} have no effect.
11548 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
11549 @code{glr-parser} directive.
11551 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
11552 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
11554 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
11555 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
11556 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
11558 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
11559 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
11560 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11562 if needed. Also, in the future the
11563 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11564 access the token names and codes.
11566 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11567 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11568 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11569 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11572 @node Java Semantic Values
11573 @subsection Java Semantic Values
11574 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11576 @c - Printer and destructor
11578 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11579 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11580 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11583 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11584 %type <Integer> number
11587 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11588 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11589 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11590 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define api.value.type}
11591 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11594 %define api.value.type @{ASTNode@}
11598 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11599 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11601 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11602 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11603 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11604 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11605 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11606 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11608 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11609 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11610 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11612 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11613 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11614 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11617 @node Java Location Values
11618 @subsection Java Location Values
11620 @c - class Position
11621 @c - class Location
11623 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11624 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11625 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11626 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11627 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11628 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11629 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11631 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11632 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11633 with @code{%define api.position.type @{@var{class-name}@}}. This class must
11634 be supplied by the user.
11637 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11638 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11639 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11642 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11643 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11646 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11647 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11650 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11651 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11652 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11653 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
11657 @node Java Parser Interface
11658 @subsection Java Parser Interface
11659 @c - define parser_class_name
11661 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11663 @c - Reporting errors
11665 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11666 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11667 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11668 @samp{%define parser_class_name @{@var{name}@}} to give a custom name to
11669 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11671 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11672 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11673 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11674 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11675 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11676 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11677 A single @samp{%define annotations @{@var{annotations}@}} directive can
11678 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11680 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11681 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11682 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11683 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11685 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11686 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11687 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11688 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11689 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11690 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11692 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11693 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11694 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11695 which initialize them automatically.
11697 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11698 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11699 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11700 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11702 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11703 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11704 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11707 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11708 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11709 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11712 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11713 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11714 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11716 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11717 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11718 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11721 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11722 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11723 @code{false} otherwise.
11726 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11727 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11728 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11729 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11730 verbose error messages.
11733 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11734 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11735 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11736 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11737 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11738 available only if location tracking is active.
11741 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11742 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11743 from a syntax error.
11744 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11747 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11748 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11749 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11753 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11754 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11755 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11756 or nonzero, full tracing.
11759 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11760 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11761 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11765 @node Java Scanner Interface
11766 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11769 @c - Lexer interface
11771 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11772 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11773 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11774 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11775 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11778 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11779 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11780 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11781 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11784 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11785 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11786 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11787 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11790 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11792 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11793 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11794 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11795 changed using @code{%define api.location.type @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11798 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11799 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11800 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11803 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11804 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11807 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11808 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11809 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11810 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11811 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11813 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11814 @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11817 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11818 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11820 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define api.value.type
11821 @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11824 @node Java Action Features
11825 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11827 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11828 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11830 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11831 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11834 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11835 This may not be assigned to.
11836 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11839 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11840 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11841 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11845 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11846 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11847 @samp{%define api.value.type}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11848 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11849 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11850 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11853 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11854 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11855 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11856 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11858 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11862 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11863 This may not be assigned to.
11864 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11868 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11869 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11872 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11873 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11874 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11877 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11878 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11879 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11882 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11883 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11884 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11887 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11888 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11889 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11891 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11894 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11895 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11896 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11897 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11898 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11899 available only if location tracking is active.
11902 @node Java Push Parser Interface
11903 @subsection Java Push Parser Interface
11904 @c - define push_parse
11905 @findex %define api.push-pull
11907 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve. More
11908 user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11910 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser for Java.
11911 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
11912 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
11915 %define api.push-pull push
11918 Most of the discussion about the Java pull Parser Interface, (@pxref{Java
11919 Parser Interface}) applies to the push parser interface as well.
11921 When generating a push parser, the method @code{push_parse} is created with
11922 the following signature (depending on if locations are enabled).
11924 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} push_parse ({int} @var{token}, {Object} @var{yylval})
11925 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} push_parse ({int} @var{token}, {Object} @var{yylval}, {Location} @var{yyloc})
11926 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} push_parse ({int} @var{token}, {Object} @var{yylval}, {Position} @var{yypos})
11929 The primary difference with respect to a pull parser is that the parser
11930 method @code{push_parse} is invoked repeatedly to parse each token. This
11931 function is available if either the "%define api.push-pull push" or "%define
11932 api.push-pull both" declaration is used (@pxref{%define
11933 Summary,,api.push-pull}). The @code{Location} and @code{Position}
11934 parameters are available only if location tracking is active.
11936 The value returned by the @code{push_parse} method is one of the following
11937 four constants: @code{YYABORT}, @code{YYACCEPT}, @code{YYERROR}, or
11938 @code{YYPUSH_MORE}. This new value, @code{YYPUSH_MORE}, may be returned if
11939 more input is required to finish parsing the grammar.
11941 If api.push-pull is declared as @code{both}, then the generated parser class
11942 will also implement the @code{parse} method. This method's body is a loop
11943 that repeatedly invokes the scanner and then passes the values obtained from
11944 the scanner to the @code{push_parse} method.
11946 There is one additional complication. Technically, the push parser does not
11947 need to know about the scanner (i.e. an object implementing the
11948 @code{YYParser.Lexer} interface), but it does need access to the
11949 @code{yyerror} method. Currently, the @code{yyerror} method is defined in
11950 the @code{YYParser.Lexer} interface. Hence, an implementation of that
11951 interface is still required in order to provide an implementation of
11952 @code{yyerror}. The current approach (and subject to change) is to require
11953 the @code{YYParser} constructor to be given an object implementing the
11954 @code{YYParser.Lexer} interface. This object need only implement the
11955 @code{yyerror} method; the other methods can be stubbed since they will
11956 never be invoked. The simplest way to do this is to add a trivial scanner
11957 implementation to your grammar file using whatever implementation of
11958 @code{yyerror} is desired. The following code sample shows a simple way to
11964 public Object getLVal () @{return null;@}
11965 public int yylex () @{return 0;@}
11966 public void yyerror (String s) @{System.err.println(s);@}
11970 @node Java Differences
11971 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11973 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11974 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11975 section summarizes these differences.
11979 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11980 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11981 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11982 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11983 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11984 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11985 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11987 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11988 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11989 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11990 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11991 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11994 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11995 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11996 @samp{%define api.value.type}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11997 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11998 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11999 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
12000 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
12001 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
12002 @ref{Java Action Features}.
12005 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
12007 @item @code{%code imports}
12008 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
12009 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
12010 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
12012 @item unqualified @code{%code}
12013 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
12015 @item @code{%code lexer}
12016 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
12017 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
12018 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
12022 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
12023 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
12024 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
12026 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
12027 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
12032 @node Java Declarations Summary
12033 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
12035 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
12036 meaning when used in a Java parser.
12038 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
12039 Generate a Java class for the parser.
12042 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
12043 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
12044 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
12045 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
12046 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12049 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12050 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
12051 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
12052 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12055 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
12056 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
12057 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
12058 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12061 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
12062 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
12063 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12066 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
12067 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
12068 a Java @emph{type}.
12069 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12072 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12073 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
12074 @xref{Java Differences}.
12077 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12078 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
12079 @xref{Java Differences}.
12082 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12083 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
12084 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12087 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12088 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
12089 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12092 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
12093 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
12094 @emph{outside} the parser class.
12095 @xref{Java Differences}.
12098 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
12099 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
12100 @xref{Java Differences}.
12103 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
12104 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
12105 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12108 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} @{@var{annotations}@}
12109 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
12110 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12113 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} @{@var{superclass}@}
12114 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
12115 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12118 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
12119 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
12120 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12123 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} @{@var{interfaces}@}
12124 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
12126 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12129 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12130 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
12131 constructor. Default is none.
12132 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12135 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12136 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
12137 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
12138 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12141 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @{@var{class}@}
12142 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
12143 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
12144 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
12145 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
12146 @xref{Java Location Values}.
12149 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} @{@var{package}@}
12150 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
12151 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12154 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} @{@var{name}@}
12155 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
12156 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
12157 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12160 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} @{@var{class}@}
12161 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
12162 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
12163 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
12164 @xref{Java Location Values}.
12167 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
12168 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
12169 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12172 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.value.type} @{@var{class}@}
12173 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
12174 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12177 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
12178 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
12179 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12182 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12183 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
12184 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
12185 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12189 @c ================================================= FAQ
12192 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
12193 @cindex frequently asked questions
12196 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
12200 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
12201 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
12202 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
12203 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
12204 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
12205 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
12206 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
12207 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
12208 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
12209 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
12210 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
12211 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
12214 @node Memory Exhausted
12215 @section Memory Exhausted
12218 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
12219 message. What can I do?
12222 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12225 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
12226 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
12228 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
12229 following typical questions:
12232 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
12233 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
12234 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
12241 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
12242 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
12243 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
12246 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
12247 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
12248 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
12249 demonstration, consider the following source file,
12250 @file{first-line.l}:
12256 #include <stdlib.h>
12260 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
12264 yyparse (char const *file)
12266 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
12270 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12274 /* One token only. */
12276 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
12279 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12297 If the file @file{input} contains
12305 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
12308 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
12309 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
12310 $ @kbd{./first-line}
12315 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
12316 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
12317 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
12318 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
12319 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
12320 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
12321 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
12322 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
12325 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
12326 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
12327 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
12328 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
12330 @node Strings are Destroyed
12331 @section Strings are Destroyed
12334 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
12335 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
12336 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
12339 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
12340 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
12341 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
12347 char *yylval = NULL;
12352 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
12360 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
12361 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
12362 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
12363 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
12369 If you compile and run this code, you get:
12372 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12373 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12374 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12380 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
12381 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
12382 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
12383 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
12384 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
12385 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
12388 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12389 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12390 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12395 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
12396 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
12399 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
12400 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
12403 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
12404 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
12405 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
12406 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
12407 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
12408 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
12409 execute simple instructions one after the others.
12411 @cindex abstract syntax tree
12413 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
12414 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
12415 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
12416 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
12417 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
12418 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
12421 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
12422 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
12425 @node Multiple start-symbols
12426 @section Multiple start-symbols
12429 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
12430 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
12431 multiple entry points.
12434 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
12435 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
12436 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
12437 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
12441 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
12448 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
12449 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
12451 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
12452 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
12453 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
12454 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
12455 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
12456 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
12457 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
12458 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
12461 /* @r{Prologue.} */
12466 int t = start_token;
12471 /* @r{The rules.} */
12475 @node Secure? Conform?
12476 @section Secure? Conform?
12479 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
12482 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
12483 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
12484 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
12485 please send us a bug report.
12487 @node I can't build Bison
12488 @section I can't build Bison
12491 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
12492 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
12496 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
12497 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
12498 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
12499 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
12500 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
12501 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
12502 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
12505 @node Where can I find help?
12506 @section Where can I find help?
12509 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
12512 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
12513 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
12514 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
12515 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
12516 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
12517 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
12518 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
12519 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
12523 @section Bug Reports
12526 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
12529 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
12530 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
12531 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
12532 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
12533 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
12535 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
12536 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
12537 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
12538 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
12539 easier it will be to fix the bug.
12541 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
12542 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
12543 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
12544 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
12545 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
12546 send additional files as well (such as @file{config.h} or @file{config.cache}).
12548 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
12549 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
12551 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
12553 @node More Languages
12554 @section More Languages
12557 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
12558 favorite language here}?
12561 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
12562 languages; contributions are welcome.
12565 @section Beta Testing
12568 What is involved in being a beta tester?
12571 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
12572 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
12573 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
12574 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
12575 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
12576 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
12577 essentially halted.
12579 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
12580 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
12581 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
12582 systems are especially welcome.
12584 @node Mailing Lists
12585 @section Mailing Lists
12588 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
12591 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
12593 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
12595 @node Table of Symbols
12596 @appendix Bison Symbols
12597 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
12598 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
12600 @deffn {Variable} @@$
12601 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
12602 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12605 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
12606 @deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
12607 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
12608 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12610 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12611 with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12614 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
12615 @deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
12616 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12617 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12620 @deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
12621 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12622 with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12625 @deffn {Variable} $$
12626 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
12630 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
12631 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
12632 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12635 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12636 @deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12637 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12641 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
12642 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12643 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12644 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12647 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12648 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12649 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12650 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12651 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12655 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12656 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12657 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12658 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12659 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12660 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12661 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12663 This feature is experimental.
12664 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12668 @deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
12669 @deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
12670 Comments, as in C/C++.
12673 @deffn {Delimiter} :
12674 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12678 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
12679 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12682 @deffn {Delimiter} |
12683 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12684 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12687 @deffn {Directive} <*>
12688 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12691 This feature is experimental.
12692 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12695 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12698 @deffn {Directive} <>
12699 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12702 This feature is experimental.
12703 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12706 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12709 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
12710 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12711 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12712 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12715 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12716 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12717 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12718 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12719 @xref{%code Summary}.
12722 @deffn {Directive} %debug
12723 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12727 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12728 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12729 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12734 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12735 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12736 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
12737 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12738 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12741 @deffn {Directive} %defines
12742 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12743 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12746 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12747 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12748 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12751 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
12752 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12753 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12756 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
12757 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12758 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12762 @deffn {Directive} %empty
12763 Bison declaration to declare make explicit that a rule has an empty
12764 right-hand side. @xref{Empty Rules}.
12767 @deffn {Symbol} $end
12768 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12769 used in the grammar.
12772 @deffn {Symbol} error
12773 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12774 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12775 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12776 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12777 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12778 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12779 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12780 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12783 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12784 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12785 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12788 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12789 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12793 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12794 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12795 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12798 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12799 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12802 @deffn {Directive} %language
12803 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12804 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12807 @deffn {Directive} %left
12808 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12809 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12812 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12813 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12814 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12818 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12819 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12820 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12821 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12822 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12825 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12826 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12827 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12829 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12830 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12831 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12833 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12834 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12835 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12836 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12837 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12838 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12839 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12840 @code{%define api.namespace} documentation in this section.
12845 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12846 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12847 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12852 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12853 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12854 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12857 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12858 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12859 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12862 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12863 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12864 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12867 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12868 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12869 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12870 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12873 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12874 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12875 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12878 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12879 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12880 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12883 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12884 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12885 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12888 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12889 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12890 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12891 unreasonable usage.
12894 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12895 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12896 Require a Version of Bison}.
12899 @deffn {Directive} %right
12900 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12901 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12904 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12905 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12906 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12909 @deffn {Directive} %start
12910 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12914 @deffn {Directive} %token
12915 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12916 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12919 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12920 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12921 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12924 @deffn {Directive} %type
12925 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12926 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12929 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12930 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12931 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12935 @deffn {Directive} %union
12936 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12937 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
12940 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12941 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12942 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12943 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12944 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12946 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12950 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12951 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12952 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12953 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12955 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12959 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12960 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12961 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12964 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12965 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12966 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12967 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12968 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12971 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12972 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12973 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12976 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12977 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12978 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12981 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12982 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12983 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12984 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12987 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12988 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12989 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12992 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12993 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12994 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12995 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12996 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12997 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12999 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
13003 @deffn {Function} yyerror
13004 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
13005 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
13008 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
13009 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
13010 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
13011 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
13012 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
13013 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
13014 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
13017 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
13018 Macro used to output run-time traces.
13019 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
13022 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
13023 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
13024 @xref{Memory Management}.
13027 @deffn {Function} yylex
13028 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
13029 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
13033 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
13034 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
13035 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
13036 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
13038 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
13040 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
13041 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
13042 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
13045 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
13046 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
13047 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
13050 @deffn {Variable} yylval
13051 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
13052 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
13053 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
13055 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
13056 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
13057 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
13060 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
13061 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
13065 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
13066 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
13067 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
13068 pure push parser, it is a member of @code{yypstate}.)
13069 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
13072 @deffn {Function} yyparse
13073 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
13074 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
13077 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
13078 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
13079 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
13080 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
13083 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
13084 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
13085 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
13086 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
13087 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
13088 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13089 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13092 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
13093 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
13094 call this function to create a new parser.
13095 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
13096 @code{yypstate_new}}.
13097 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13098 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13101 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
13102 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
13103 parse the rest of the input stream.
13104 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
13105 @code{yypull_parse}}.
13106 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13107 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13110 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
13111 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
13112 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
13113 @code{yypush_parse}}.
13114 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13115 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13118 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
13119 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
13120 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
13121 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
13124 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
13125 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
13126 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
13127 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
13128 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
13129 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
13130 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
13132 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
13133 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
13134 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
13135 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
13136 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
13137 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
13138 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
13141 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
13142 Deprecated in favor of the @code{%define} variable @code{api.value.type}.
13143 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
13144 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
13152 @item Accepting state
13153 A state whose only action is the accept action.
13154 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
13155 @xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
13157 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
13158 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
13159 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
13160 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
13161 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13163 @item Consistent state
13164 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
13166 @item Context-free grammars
13167 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
13168 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
13169 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
13170 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
13173 @item Default reduction
13174 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
13175 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
13176 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
13177 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
13180 @item Defaulted state
13181 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
13183 @item Dynamic allocation
13184 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
13185 compile time or on entry to a function.
13188 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
13189 character string of length zero.
13191 @item Finite-state stack machine
13192 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
13193 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
13194 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
13195 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
13196 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
13197 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13199 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
13200 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
13201 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
13202 deterministic parsing
13203 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
13204 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
13205 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
13209 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
13210 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
13211 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13213 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
13214 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
13215 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
13216 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
13217 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
13218 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
13219 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
13220 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
13221 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
13222 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
13224 @item Infix operator
13225 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
13226 performs some operation.
13229 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
13231 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
13232 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
13233 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
13234 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
13235 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
13236 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
13237 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
13239 @item Language construct
13240 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
13241 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
13242 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13244 @item Left associativity
13245 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
13246 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
13247 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
13249 @item Left recursion
13250 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
13251 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13254 @item Left-to-right parsing
13255 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
13256 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13258 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
13259 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
13260 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
13262 @item Lexical tie-in
13263 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
13264 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
13266 @item Literal string token
13267 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
13269 @item Lookahead token
13270 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
13274 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
13275 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
13276 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
13279 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
13280 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
13282 @item Nonterminal symbol
13283 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
13284 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
13285 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
13288 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
13289 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
13292 @item Postfix operator
13293 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
13294 performs some operation.
13297 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
13298 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
13302 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
13303 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
13304 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
13306 @item Reverse polish notation
13307 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
13309 @item Right recursion
13310 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
13311 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13315 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
13316 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
13317 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
13320 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
13321 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
13322 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13324 @item Single-character literal
13325 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
13326 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
13329 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
13330 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
13331 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
13332 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
13335 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
13336 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
13337 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
13340 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
13341 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
13344 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
13345 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
13346 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
13347 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
13349 @item Terminal symbol
13350 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
13351 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
13352 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13354 @item Unreachable state
13355 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
13356 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
13357 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
13360 @node Copying This Manual
13361 @appendix Copying This Manual
13365 @unnumbered Bibliography
13369 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
13370 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
13371 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
13372 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
13374 @item [Denny 2010 May]
13375 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
13376 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
13377 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
13378 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
13380 @item [Denny 2010 November]
13381 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
13382 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
13383 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
13384 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
13386 @item [DeRemer 1982]
13387 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
13388 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
13389 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
13390 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
13393 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
13394 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
13395 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
13398 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
13399 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
13400 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
13401 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
13404 @node Index of Terms
13405 @unnumbered Index of Terms
13411 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
13412 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
13413 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
13414 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
13415 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
13416 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
13417 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
13418 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
13419 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
13420 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
13421 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
13422 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
13423 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
13424 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
13425 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
13426 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
13427 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
13428 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
13429 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
13430 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
13431 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
13432 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
13433 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
13434 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
13435 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
13436 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
13437 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
13438 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
13439 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
13440 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
13441 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
13442 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
13443 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
13444 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
13445 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
13446 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
13447 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
13448 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
13449 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
13450 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
13451 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
13452 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
13453 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
13454 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
13455 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
13456 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
13457 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
13458 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
13459 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
13460 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
13461 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
13462 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
13463 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
13464 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
13465 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
13466 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
13467 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
13468 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
13470 @c Local Variables:
13471 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"