1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you have the new `shorttitlepage' command
16 @c @clear shorttitlepage-enabled
17 @c @set shorttitlepage-enabled
19 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
20 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
23 @c ISPELL CHECK: done, 14 Jan 1993 --bob
25 @c Check COPYRIGHT dates. should be updated in the titlepage, ifinfo
26 @c titlepage; should NOT be changed in the GPL. --mew
28 @c FIXME: I don't understand this `iftex'. Obsolete? --akim.
39 @comment %**end of header
43 This manual is for @acronym{GNU} Bison (version @value{VERSION},
44 @value{UPDATED}), the @acronym{GNU} parser generator.
46 Copyright @copyright{} 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1998,
47 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
50 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
51 under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License,
52 Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software
53 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
54 being ``A @acronym{GNU} Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
55 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
56 ``@acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License.''
58 (a) The @acronym{FSF}'s Back-Cover Text is: ``You have freedom to copy
59 and modify this @acronym{GNU} Manual, like @acronym{GNU} software.
60 Copies published by the Free Software Foundation raise funds for
61 @acronym{GNU} development.''
65 @dircategory Software development
67 * bison: (bison). @acronym{GNU} parser generator (Yacc replacement).
70 @ifset shorttitlepage-enabled
75 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
76 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
78 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
81 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
84 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
85 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
86 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
87 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
88 @acronym{ISBN} 1-882114-44-2
90 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
104 * Copying:: The @acronym{GNU} General Public License says
105 how you can copy and share Bison
108 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
109 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
112 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
113 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
114 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
115 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
116 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
117 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
118 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
119 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser source file).
120 * C++ Language Interface:: Creating C++ parser objects.
121 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
122 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
123 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
124 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
125 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
128 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
130 The Concepts of Bison
132 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
133 as mathematical ideas.
134 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
135 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
136 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
137 the name of an identifier, etc.).
138 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
139 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
140 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
141 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
142 how is the output used?
143 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
144 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
146 Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers
148 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers on unambiguous grammars
149 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers to resolve ambiguities
150 * Compiler Requirements:: @acronym{GLR} parsers require a modern C compiler
154 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
155 a first example with no operator precedence.
156 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
157 Operator precedence is introduced.
158 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
159 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
160 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
161 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
162 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
164 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
166 * Decls: Rpcalc Decls. Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
167 * Rules: Rpcalc Rules. Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
168 * Lexer: Rpcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
169 * Main: Rpcalc Main. The controlling function.
170 * Error: Rpcalc Error. The error reporting function.
171 * Gen: Rpcalc Gen. Running Bison on the grammar file.
172 * Comp: Rpcalc Compile. Run the C compiler on the output code.
174 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
180 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
182 * Decls: Ltcalc Decls. Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
183 * Rules: Ltcalc Rules. Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
184 * Lexer: Ltcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
186 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
188 * Decl: Mfcalc Decl. Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
189 * Rules: Mfcalc Rules. Grammar rules for the calculator.
190 * Symtab: Mfcalc Symtab. Symbol table management subroutines.
194 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
195 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
196 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
197 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
198 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
199 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
200 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
201 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
203 Outline of a Bison Grammar
205 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
206 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
207 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
208 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
210 Defining Language Semantics
212 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
213 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
214 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
215 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
216 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
217 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
218 action in the middle of a rule.
222 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
223 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
224 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
228 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
229 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
230 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
231 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
232 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
233 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
234 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
235 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
236 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
237 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
239 Parser C-Language Interface
241 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
242 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
244 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
245 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
246 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
249 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
251 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
252 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
253 of the token it has read.
254 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
255 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
257 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
258 in a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
260 The Bison Parser Algorithm
262 * Look-Ahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
263 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
264 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
265 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
266 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
267 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
268 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
269 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
270 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
274 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
275 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
276 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
277 * How Precedence:: How they work.
279 Handling Context Dependencies
281 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
282 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
283 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
284 error recovery rules must be written.
286 Debugging Your Parser
288 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
289 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
293 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
294 in alphabetical order by short options.
295 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
296 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
298 C++ Language Interface
300 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
301 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
305 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
306 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
307 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
308 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
309 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
311 A Complete C++ Example
313 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
314 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
315 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
316 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
317 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
319 Frequently Asked Questions
321 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
322 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
323 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
324 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
328 * GNU Free Documentation License:: License for copying this manual.
334 @unnumbered Introduction
337 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts a
338 grammar description for an @acronym{LALR}(1) context-free grammar into a C
339 program to parse that grammar. Once you are proficient with Bison,
340 you may use it to develop a wide range of language parsers, from those
341 used in simple desk calculators to complex programming languages.
343 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc grammars
344 ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar with Yacc
345 should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need to be fluent in
346 C programming in order to use Bison or to understand this manual.
348 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of using
349 Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the last. If you
350 don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these chapters. Reference
351 chapters follow which describe specific aspects of Bison in detail.
353 Bison was written primarily by Robert Corbett; Richard Stallman made it
354 Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University added
355 multi-character string literals and other features.
357 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
360 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
362 As of Bison version 1.24, we have changed the distribution terms for
363 @code{yyparse} to permit using Bison's output in nonfree programs when
364 Bison is generating C code for @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers. Formerly, these
365 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
367 The other @acronym{GNU} programming tools, such as the @acronym{GNU} C
369 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
370 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
371 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
372 License to all of the Bison source code.
374 The output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser file---contains a
375 verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is the code for the
376 @code{yyparse} function. (The actions from your grammar are inserted
377 into this function at one point, but the rest of the function is not
378 changed.) When we applied the @acronym{GPL} terms to the code for
380 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
382 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
383 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
384 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
385 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
386 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
387 using the other @acronym{GNU} tools.
389 This exception applies only when Bison is generating C code for an
390 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser; otherwise, the @acronym{GPL} terms operate
392 tell whether the exception applies to your @samp{.c} output file by
393 inspecting it to see whether it says ``As a special exception, when
394 this file is copied by Bison into a Bison output file, you may use
395 that output file without restriction.''
400 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
402 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
403 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
404 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
407 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
408 as mathematical ideas.
409 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
410 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
411 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
412 the name of an identifier, etc.).
413 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
414 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
415 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
416 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
417 how is the output used?
418 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
419 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
422 @node Language and Grammar
423 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
425 @cindex context-free grammar
426 @cindex grammar, context-free
427 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
428 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
429 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
430 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
431 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
432 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
433 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
434 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
437 @cindex @acronym{BNF}
438 @cindex Backus-Naur form
439 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
440 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``@acronym{BNF}'', which was developed in
441 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
442 @acronym{BNF} is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
443 essentially machine-readable @acronym{BNF}.
445 @cindex @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars
446 @cindex @acronym{LR}(1) grammars
447 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammar. Although it
448 can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
449 are called @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars.
450 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to
451 tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single
452 token of look-ahead. Strictly speaking, that is a description of an
453 @acronym{LR}(1) grammar, and @acronym{LALR}(1) involves additional
454 restrictions that are
455 hard to explain simply; but it is rare in actual practice to find an
456 @acronym{LR}(1) grammar that fails to be @acronym{LALR}(1).
457 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
458 more information on this.
460 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
461 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
462 @cindex ambiguous grammars
463 @cindex non-deterministic parsing
465 Parsers for @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
466 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
467 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
468 (called a @dfn{look-ahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
469 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
470 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
471 grammars can be @dfn{non-deterministic}, meaning that no fixed
472 look-ahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
473 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
474 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as @acronym{GLR}
475 parsing (for Generalized @acronym{LR}). Bison's @acronym{GLR} parsers
476 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
477 possible parses of any given string is finite.
479 @cindex symbols (abstract)
481 @cindex syntactic grouping
482 @cindex grouping, syntactic
483 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
484 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
485 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
486 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
487 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
488 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
489 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
491 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
492 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
493 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
494 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
495 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
496 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
497 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
498 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
499 lexicography, not grammar.)
501 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
505 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
506 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
507 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
508 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
509 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,
510 identifier, semicolon} */
511 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
516 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
517 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
518 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
519 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
520 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
524 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
525 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
526 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
527 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
528 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
529 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
530 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
531 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
533 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
534 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
535 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
536 reads informally as follows:
539 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
544 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
548 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
549 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
550 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
551 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
554 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
555 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
556 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
557 not the start symbol.
559 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
560 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
561 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
562 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
563 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
564 reports a syntax error.
566 @node Grammar in Bison
567 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
568 @cindex Bison grammar
569 @cindex grammar, Bison
570 @cindex formal grammar
572 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
573 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
574 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
576 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
577 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
578 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
580 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
581 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
582 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
583 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
584 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
585 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
586 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
589 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
590 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
591 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
592 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
594 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
595 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
597 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
598 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
599 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
600 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
604 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
609 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
611 @node Semantic Values
612 @section Semantic Values
613 @cindex semantic value
614 @cindex value, semantic
616 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
617 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
618 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
619 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
620 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
623 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
624 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
625 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
626 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
627 ,Defining Language Semantics},
630 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
631 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
632 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
633 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
636 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
637 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
638 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
639 need to have any semantic value.)
641 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
642 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
643 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
644 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
645 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
646 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
648 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
649 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
650 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
651 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
652 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
654 @node Semantic Actions
655 @section Semantic Actions
656 @cindex semantic actions
657 @cindex actions, semantic
659 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
660 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
661 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
662 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
665 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
666 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
667 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
668 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
669 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
670 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
671 newly recognized larger expression.
673 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
677 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
682 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
683 from the values of the two subexpressions.
686 @section Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers
687 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
688 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
691 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
692 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
694 In some grammars, Bison's standard
695 @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
696 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
697 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
698 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
699 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
700 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
701 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
702 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
704 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be @acronym{LALR}(1), a
705 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
706 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
707 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized @acronym{LR}
708 (@acronym{GLR}) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
709 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
710 declarations) identically to @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers. However, when
711 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
712 @acronym{GLR} parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
713 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
714 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
715 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
716 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
717 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
718 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
719 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
720 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
721 identical set of symbols.
723 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
724 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
725 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
726 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
727 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
728 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
729 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
730 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
731 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
735 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers on unambiguous grammars
736 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers to resolve ambiguities
737 * Compiler Requirements:: @acronym{GLR} parsers require a modern C compiler
740 @node Simple GLR Parsers
741 @subsection Using @acronym{GLR} on Unambiguous Grammars
742 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing, unambiguous grammars
743 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing, unambiguous grammars
747 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
748 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
750 In the simplest cases, you can use the @acronym{GLR} algorithm
751 to parse grammars that are unambiguous, but fail to be @acronym{LALR}(1).
752 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of look-ahead,
753 or (in rare cases) fall into the category of grammars in which the
754 @acronym{LALR}(1) algorithm throws away too much information (they are in
755 @acronym{LR}(1), but not @acronym{LALR}(1), @ref{Mystery Conflicts}).
757 Consider a problem that
758 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
759 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
762 type subrange = lo .. hi;
763 type enum = (a, b, c);
767 The original language standard allows only numeric
768 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
769 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (@acronym{ISO}/@acronym{IEC}
770 10206) and many other
771 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
772 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
776 type subrange = (a) .. b;
780 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
781 type with only one value:
788 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
789 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
791 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
792 With normal @acronym{LALR}(1) one-token look-ahead it is not
793 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
794 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
795 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
796 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
797 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
798 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
800 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
801 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
802 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
803 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
806 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
807 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
808 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
809 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
810 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
811 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
814 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
815 use the @acronym{GLR} algorithm.
816 When the @acronym{GLR} parser reaches the critical state, it
817 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
818 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
819 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
820 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
821 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
822 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
823 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
824 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
826 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
827 reports a syntax error as usual.
829 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
830 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
831 look-ahead than the underlying @acronym{LALR}(1) algorithm actually allows
832 for. In this example, @acronym{LALR}(2) would suffice, but also some cases
833 that are not @acronym{LALR}(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
835 In general, a @acronym{GLR} parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
836 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
837 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
838 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
839 The present example contains only one conflict between two
840 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
841 cannot be nested. So the number of
842 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
843 and the parsing time is still linear.
845 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
846 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
849 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
859 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
864 type : '(' id_list ')'
886 When used as a normal @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
887 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
888 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
889 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
896 The parser can be turned into a @acronym{GLR} parser, while also telling Bison
897 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by
898 adding these two declarations to the Bison input file (before the first
907 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
908 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
909 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
910 notice when the parser splits.
912 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of @acronym{GLR}, almost
913 without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however, there
914 are at least two potential problems to beware.
915 First, always analyze the conflicts reported by
916 Bison to make sure that @acronym{GLR} splitting is only done where it is
917 intended. A @acronym{GLR} parser splitting inadvertently may cause
918 problems less obvious than an @acronym{LALR} parser statically choosing the
919 wrong alternative in a conflict.
920 Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic Tokens})
921 with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens
922 without performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot
923 obtain information via parser actions. Some cases of
924 lexer interactions can be eliminated by using @acronym{GLR} to
925 shift the complications from the lexer to the parser. You must check
926 the remaining cases for correctness.
928 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens
929 based on their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new
930 symbols are defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it
931 is possible for a parser to define the enumeration
932 constants as they are parsed, before the type declaration is
933 completed, it actually makes no difference since they cannot be used
934 within the same enumerated type declaration.
936 @node Merging GLR Parses
937 @subsection Using @acronym{GLR} to Resolve Ambiguities
938 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing, ambiguous grammars
939 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing, ambiguous grammars
943 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
945 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
950 #define YYSTYPE char const *
952 void yyerror (char const *);
965 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
968 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
972 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
973 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
974 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
975 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
976 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
979 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
980 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
981 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
982 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
985 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
991 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
992 certain declarations and statements. For example,
999 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1000 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1001 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1002 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1003 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1004 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1005 @acronym{GLR} parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1006 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1007 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1008 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1009 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1010 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1011 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1012 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1014 At this point, the @acronym{GLR} parser requires a specification in the
1015 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1016 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1017 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1018 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1019 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1020 The parser therefore prints
1023 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1026 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1027 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1034 This is another example of using @acronym{GLR} to parse an unambiguous
1035 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1036 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1037 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1038 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1039 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1040 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1041 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1042 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1043 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1049 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1050 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1051 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1052 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1056 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1057 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1062 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1066 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1074 with an accompanying forward declaration
1075 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1079 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1080 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1085 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1086 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1089 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1092 Bison requires that all of the
1093 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1094 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1095 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1096 the offending merge.
1098 @node Compiler Requirements
1099 @subsection Considerations when Compiling @acronym{GLR} Parsers
1100 @cindex @code{inline}
1101 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{inline}
1103 The @acronym{GLR} parsers require a compiler for @acronym{ISO} C89 or
1104 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1105 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1106 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1107 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1108 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1117 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1121 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1127 @node Locations Overview
1130 @cindex textual location
1131 @cindex location, textual
1133 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1134 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1135 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1136 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1138 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1139 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1140 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1141 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1143 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1144 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1145 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1148 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1149 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1150 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1151 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1152 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1153 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1154 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1157 @section Bison Output: the Parser File
1158 @cindex Bison parser
1159 @cindex Bison utility
1160 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1163 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The output
1164 is a C source file that parses the language described by the grammar.
1165 This file is called a @dfn{Bison parser}. Keep in mind that the Bison
1166 utility and the Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility
1167 is a program whose output is the Bison parser that becomes part of your
1170 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1171 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1172 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1175 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1176 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1177 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1178 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1179 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1180 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1181 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1183 The Bison parser file is C code which defines a function named
1184 @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This function does not make
1185 a complete C program: you must supply some additional functions. One is
1186 the lexical analyzer. Another is an error-reporting function which the
1187 parser calls to report an error. In addition, a complete C program must
1188 start with a function called @code{main}; you have to provide this, and
1189 arrange for it to call @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run.
1190 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
1192 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1193 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser file itself
1194 begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface functions
1195 such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the error reporting
1196 function @code{yyerror} and the parser function @code{yyparse} itself.
1197 This also includes numerous identifiers used for internal purposes.
1198 Therefore, you should avoid using C identifiers starting with @samp{yy}
1199 or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar file except for the ones defined in
1202 In some cases the Bison parser file includes system headers, and in
1203 those cases your code should respect the identifiers reserved by those
1204 headers. On some non-@acronym{GNU} hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1205 @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are included as needed to
1206 declare memory allocators and related types. @code{<libintl.h>} is
1207 included if message translation is in use
1208 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may
1209 be included if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value
1210 (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1213 @section Stages in Using Bison
1214 @cindex stages in using Bison
1217 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1218 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1222 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1223 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1224 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1225 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1226 sequence of C statements.
1229 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1230 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1231 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1232 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1235 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1238 Write error-reporting routines.
1241 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1242 must follow these steps:
1246 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1249 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1252 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1255 @node Grammar Layout
1256 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1257 @cindex grammar file
1259 @cindex format of grammar file
1260 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1262 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1263 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1270 @var{Bison declarations}
1279 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1280 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1282 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1283 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1284 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1285 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1286 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1287 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1289 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1290 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1291 semantic values of various symbols.
1293 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1296 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1297 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1298 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1302 @cindex simple examples
1303 @cindex examples, simple
1305 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1306 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1307 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1308 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1309 desk-top calculator.
1311 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1312 languages are written the same way.
1314 You can copy these examples out of the Info file and into a source file
1319 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1320 a first example with no operator precedence.
1321 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1322 Operator precedence is introduced.
1323 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1324 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1325 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1326 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1327 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1331 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1332 @cindex reverse polish notation
1333 @cindex polish notation calculator
1334 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1335 @cindex calculator, simple
1337 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1338 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1339 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1340 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1342 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1343 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison input files.
1346 * Decls: Rpcalc Decls. Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1347 * Rules: Rpcalc Rules. Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1348 * Lexer: Rpcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
1349 * Main: Rpcalc Main. The controlling function.
1350 * Error: Rpcalc Error. The error reporting function.
1351 * Gen: Rpcalc Gen. Running Bison on the grammar file.
1352 * Comp: Rpcalc Compile. Run the C compiler on the output code.
1356 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1358 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1359 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1362 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1365 #define YYSTYPE double
1368 void yyerror (char const *);
1373 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1376 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1377 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1379 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1380 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1381 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1382 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1383 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1384 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1385 which is a floating point number.
1387 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1388 function @code{pow}.
1390 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1391 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1392 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1393 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1396 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1397 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1398 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1399 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1400 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1401 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1402 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1403 type for numeric constants.
1406 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1408 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1416 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1419 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1420 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1421 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1422 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1423 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1424 /* Exponentiation */
1425 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1427 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1432 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1433 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1434 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1435 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the @samp{|} punctuator
1436 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1439 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1440 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1441 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1443 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1444 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1445 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1446 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1447 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1448 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1457 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1459 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1467 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1468 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1469 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1470 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1471 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1473 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1474 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1475 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1476 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1477 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1478 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1480 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1481 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1482 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1483 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1486 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1487 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1488 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1491 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1493 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1497 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1501 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1502 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1503 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1504 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1505 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1506 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1507 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1509 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1510 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1511 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1512 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1513 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1516 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1518 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1519 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1520 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1521 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1525 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1526 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1531 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1532 equally well have written them separately:
1536 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1537 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1541 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1542 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1543 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1544 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1545 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1546 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1547 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1548 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1550 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1551 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1552 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1554 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1555 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1559 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1563 means the same thing as this:
1567 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1573 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1576 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1577 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1578 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1580 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1581 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1582 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1583 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1585 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the @acronym{RPN}
1587 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1588 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1589 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1590 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1592 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1593 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1594 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1595 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1596 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1597 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1598 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1599 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1600 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1602 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1603 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1604 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1605 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Decls,
1606 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1608 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1609 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1611 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1615 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1616 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1617 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1618 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1629 /* Skip white space. */
1630 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1634 /* Process numbers. */
1635 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1638 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1643 /* Return end-of-input. */
1646 /* Return a single char. */
1653 @subsection The Controlling Function
1654 @cindex controlling function
1655 @cindex main function in simple example
1657 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1658 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1659 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1672 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1673 @cindex error reporting routine
1675 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1676 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1677 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1678 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1679 here is the definition we will use:
1685 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1687 yyerror (char const *s)
1689 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1694 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1695 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1696 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1697 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1698 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1699 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1702 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1703 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1705 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1706 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1707 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file. The
1708 definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} go at the
1709 end, in the epilogue of the file
1710 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1712 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1713 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1715 With all the source in a single file, you use the following command to
1716 convert it into a parser file:
1719 bison @var{file_name}.y
1723 In this example the file was called @file{rpcalc.y} (for ``Reverse Polish
1724 @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a file named @file{@var{file_name}.tab.c},
1725 removing the @samp{.y} from the original file name. The file output by
1726 Bison contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional
1727 functions in the input file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main})
1728 are copied verbatim to the output.
1730 @node Rpcalc Compile
1731 @subsection Compiling the Parser File
1732 @cindex compiling the parser
1734 Here is how to compile and run the parser file:
1738 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1740 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1744 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1745 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1746 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1750 # @r{List files again.}
1752 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1756 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1757 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1763 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1765 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1769 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1771 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1776 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1777 @cindex infix notation calculator
1779 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1781 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1782 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1783 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1784 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1787 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1790 #define YYSTYPE double
1794 void yyerror (char const *);
1797 /* Bison declarations. */
1801 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1802 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1804 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1810 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1813 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1814 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1815 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1816 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1817 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1818 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1819 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1820 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1826 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1829 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1831 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1832 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1833 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1834 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1835 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1836 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1839 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1840 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1841 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1842 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1843 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1846 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1847 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1848 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1849 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1850 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1852 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1857 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1865 @node Simple Error Recovery
1866 @section Simple Error Recovery
1867 @cindex error recovery, simple
1869 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1870 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1871 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1872 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1873 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1874 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1876 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1877 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1878 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1883 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1884 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1889 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1890 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1891 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1892 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1893 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1894 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1895 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1896 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1899 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1900 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1901 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1902 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1903 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1904 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1907 @node Location Tracking Calc
1908 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1909 @cindex location tracking calculator
1910 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1911 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1913 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1914 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
1915 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
1916 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
1920 * Decls: Ltcalc Decls. Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
1921 * Rules: Ltcalc Rules. Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
1922 * Lexer: Ltcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
1926 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
1928 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
1929 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
1932 /* Location tracking calculator. */
1938 void yyerror (char const *);
1941 /* Bison declarations. */
1949 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1953 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
1954 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
1955 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
1956 four member structure with the following integer fields:
1957 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
1961 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
1963 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
1964 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
1965 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
1966 from the new information.
1968 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
1969 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
1980 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
1985 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1986 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1987 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1988 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1998 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
1999 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2000 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2005 | '-' exp %preg NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2006 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2007 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2011 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2012 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2013 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2015 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2016 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2017 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2018 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2019 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2020 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2024 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2026 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2027 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2028 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2031 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2032 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2043 /* Skip white space. */
2044 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2045 ++yylloc.last_column;
2050 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2051 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2055 /* Process numbers. */
2059 ++yylloc.last_column;
2060 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2062 ++yylloc.last_column;
2063 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2070 /* Return end-of-input. */
2074 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2078 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2081 ++yylloc.last_column;
2086 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2087 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2088 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2089 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2091 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2092 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2093 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2094 controlling function:
2101 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2102 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2108 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2109 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2110 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2112 @node Multi-function Calc
2113 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2114 @cindex multi-function calculator
2115 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2116 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2118 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2119 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2120 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2121 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2122 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2124 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2125 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2126 back all nonnumber characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2127 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2128 functions whose syntax has this form:
2131 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2135 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2136 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2137 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2141 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2145 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2151 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2156 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2159 * Decl: Mfcalc Decl. Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2160 * Rules: Mfcalc Rules. Grammar rules for the calculator.
2161 * Symtab: Mfcalc Symtab. Symbol table management subroutines.
2165 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2167 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2172 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2173 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2175 void yyerror (char const *);
2180 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2181 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2184 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2185 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2192 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2193 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2195 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2198 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2199 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2200 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2202 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2203 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2204 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2205 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2207 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2208 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2209 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2210 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2211 between angle brackets).
2213 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2214 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2215 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2216 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2217 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2218 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2221 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2223 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2224 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2225 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2237 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2238 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2243 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2244 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2245 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2246 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2247 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2248 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2249 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2250 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2251 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2252 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2253 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2256 /* End of grammar. */
2261 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2262 @cindex symbol table example
2264 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2265 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2266 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2267 requires some additional C functions for support.
2269 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2270 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2271 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2275 /* Function type. */
2276 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2280 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2283 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2284 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2287 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2288 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2290 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2295 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2297 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2298 extern symrec *sym_table;
2300 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2301 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2305 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2306 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2307 @code{init_table} as well:
2313 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2315 yyerror (char const *s)
2325 double (*fnct) (double);
2330 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2343 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2348 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2354 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2356 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2357 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2372 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2373 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2375 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2376 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2377 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2378 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2379 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2380 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2384 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2387 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2388 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2389 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2390 ptr->type = sym_type;
2391 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2392 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2398 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2401 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2402 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2403 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2409 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2410 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2411 characters with a leading non-digit are recognized as either variables or
2412 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2414 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2415 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2416 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2417 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2418 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2419 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2421 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2422 operators in @code{yylex}.
2435 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2436 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2443 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2444 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2447 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2453 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2457 static char *symbuf = 0;
2458 static int length = 0;
2463 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2464 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2466 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2473 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2477 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2479 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2481 /* Get another character. */
2486 while (isalnum (c));
2493 s = getsym (symbuf);
2495 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2500 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2506 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2507 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2508 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2516 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2519 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2520 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2521 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2524 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2525 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2529 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2531 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2532 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2534 The Bison grammar input file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2535 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2538 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2539 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2540 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2541 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2542 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2543 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2544 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2545 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2548 @node Grammar Outline
2549 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2551 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2552 appropriate delimiters:
2559 @var{Bison declarations}
2568 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2569 As a @acronym{GNU} extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2570 continues until end of line.
2573 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2574 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2575 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2576 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2580 @subsection The prologue
2581 @cindex declarations section
2583 @cindex declarations
2585 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and
2586 declarations of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the
2587 grammar rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser file so
2588 that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can use
2589 @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If you don't
2590 need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}}
2591 delimiters that bracket this section.
2593 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2594 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2595 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2596 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2597 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2598 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2599 @code{%union} declaration.
2609 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2613 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2614 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2620 @node Bison Declarations
2621 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
2622 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
2623 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
2625 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
2626 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
2627 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
2628 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
2631 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
2632 @cindex grammar rules section
2633 @cindex rules section for grammar
2635 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
2636 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
2638 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
2639 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
2640 if it is the first thing in the file.
2643 @subsection The epilogue
2644 @cindex additional C code section
2646 @cindex C code, section for additional
2648 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser file, just as
2649 the @var{Prologue} is copied to the beginning. This is the most convenient
2650 place to put anything that you want to have in the parser file but which need
2651 not come before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the
2652 definitions of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because
2653 C requires functions to be declared before being used, you often need
2654 to declare functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue,
2655 even if you define them in the Epilogue.
2656 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
2658 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
2659 from the grammar rules.
2661 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose
2662 names start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a
2663 good idea to avoid using any such names (except those documented in this
2664 manual) in the epilogue of the grammar file.
2667 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
2668 @cindex nonterminal symbol
2669 @cindex terminal symbol
2673 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
2676 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
2677 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
2678 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
2679 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
2680 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has been
2681 read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use the
2682 symbol to stand for it.
2684 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically equivalent
2685 groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules. By convention,
2686 it should be all lower case.
2688 Symbol names can contain letters, digits (not at the beginning),
2689 underscores and periods. Periods make sense only in nonterminals.
2691 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
2695 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
2696 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
2697 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
2698 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
2701 @cindex character token
2702 @cindex literal token
2703 @cindex single-character literal
2704 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
2705 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
2706 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
2707 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
2708 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
2709 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
2710 ,Operator Precedence}).
2712 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
2713 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
2714 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
2715 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
2716 your program will confuse other readers.
2718 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
2719 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
2720 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
2721 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
2722 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
2723 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
2727 @cindex string token
2728 @cindex literal string token
2729 @cindex multicharacter literal
2730 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
2731 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
2732 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
2733 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
2734 (@pxref{Precedence}).
2736 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
2737 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
2738 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
2739 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
2740 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
2742 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
2744 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
2745 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
2746 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
2747 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
2748 read your program will be confused.
2750 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
2751 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
2752 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
2753 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
2754 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
2755 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
2758 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
2759 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
2760 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
2762 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
2763 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
2764 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
2765 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
2766 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
2767 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
2768 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
2769 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
2770 Each named token type becomes a C macro in
2771 the parser file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code.
2772 (This is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.)
2773 @xref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
2775 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
2776 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
2777 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
2778 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
2779 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2781 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
2782 host, you must use only non-null character tokens taken from the basic
2783 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
2784 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
2785 characters in the following C-language string:
2788 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
2791 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character
2792 set and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
2793 @acronym{ASCII} environment, but then compile and run the resulting program
2794 in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
2795 @acronym{EBCDIC}, the resulting program may not work because the
2796 tables generated by Bison will assume @acronym{ASCII} numeric values for
2797 character tokens. It is standard
2798 practice for software distributions to contain C source files that
2799 were generated by Bison in an @acronym{ASCII} environment, so installers on
2800 platforms that are incompatible with @acronym{ASCII} must rebuild those
2801 files before compiling them.
2803 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
2804 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
2805 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
2806 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
2807 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
2810 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
2812 @cindex grammar rule syntax
2813 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
2815 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
2819 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
2825 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
2826 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
2827 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
2839 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
2840 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
2842 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
2843 extra white space as you wish.
2845 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
2846 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
2849 @{@var{C statements}@}
2853 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
2857 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
2858 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
2862 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
2863 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
2871 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
2872 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
2880 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
2882 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
2883 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
2884 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
2901 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
2905 @section Recursive Rules
2906 @cindex recursive rule
2908 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal appears
2909 also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to use
2910 recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any number
2911 of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
2912 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
2922 @cindex left recursion
2923 @cindex right recursion
2925 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
2926 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
2927 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
2938 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
2939 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
2940 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
2941 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
2942 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
2943 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
2944 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
2947 @cindex mutual recursion
2948 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
2949 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
2950 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
2958 | primary '+' primary
2970 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
2974 @section Defining Language Semantics
2975 @cindex defining language semantics
2976 @cindex language semantics, defining
2978 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
2979 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
2980 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
2982 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
2983 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
2984 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
2985 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
2988 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
2989 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
2990 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
2991 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
2992 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
2993 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
2994 action in the middle of a rule.
2998 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
2999 @cindex semantic value type
3000 @cindex value type, semantic
3001 @cindex data types of semantic values
3002 @cindex default data type
3004 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3005 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3006 @acronym{RPN} and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3007 Notation Calculator}).
3009 Bison's default is to use type @code{int} for all semantic values. To
3010 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3013 #define YYSTYPE double
3017 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3018 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3020 @node Multiple Types
3021 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3023 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3024 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3025 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type @code{char *},
3026 and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the symbol table.
3028 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3029 requires you to do two things:
3033 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, with the
3034 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3038 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3039 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3040 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3041 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3042 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3051 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3052 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3053 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3054 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3056 An action consists of C statements surrounded by braces, much like a
3057 compound statement in C@. An action can contain any sequence of C
3058 statements. Bison does not look for trigraphs, though, so if your C
3059 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3060 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, strings, or character
3063 An action can be placed at any position in the rule;
3064 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3065 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3066 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3067 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3069 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the components
3070 matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}}, which stands for
3071 the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic value for the grouping
3072 being constructed is @code{$$}. Bison translates both of these
3073 constructs into expressions of the appropriate type when it copies the
3074 actions into the parser file. @code{$$} is translated to a modifiable
3075 lvalue, so it can be assigned to.
3077 Here is a typical example:
3088 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3089 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3090 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3091 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3092 The sum is stored into @code{$$} so that it becomes the semantic value of
3093 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3094 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3095 referred to as @code{$2}.
3097 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3098 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3099 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3100 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3101 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3105 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3109 @cindex default action
3110 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3111 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3112 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3113 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3114 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3115 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3117 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3118 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3119 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3120 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3121 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3125 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3126 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3132 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3137 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3138 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3139 definition of @code{foo}.
3142 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3143 @cindex action data types
3144 @cindex data types in actions
3146 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3147 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3149 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3150 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3151 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3152 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3153 in the rule. In this example,
3164 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3165 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3166 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3167 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3169 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3170 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3171 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3183 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3184 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3186 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3187 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3188 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3189 @cindex mid-rule actions
3191 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3192 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3193 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3195 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3196 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3197 it is run before they are parsed.
3199 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3200 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3201 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3202 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3205 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3206 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3207 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3208 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3209 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3210 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3212 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3213 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3214 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3215 at the end of the rule.
3217 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3218 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3219 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3220 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3221 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3222 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3226 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3227 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3228 declare_variable ($3); @}
3230 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3235 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3236 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3237 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3238 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3239 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3240 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3241 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3242 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3244 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3245 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3246 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3247 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3248 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3250 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3251 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3252 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3253 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3254 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3259 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3260 | '@{' statements '@}'
3266 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3270 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3271 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3274 | '@{' statements '@}'
3280 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3281 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3282 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3283 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3284 the @dfn{look-ahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3285 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Look-Ahead, ,Look-Ahead Tokens}.)
3287 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3288 actions into the two rules, like this:
3292 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3293 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3294 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3295 '@{' statements '@}'
3301 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3302 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3304 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3305 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3306 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3310 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3311 declarations statements '@}'
3312 | '@{' statements '@}'
3318 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3319 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3321 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3322 serves as a subroutine:
3326 subroutine: /* empty */
3327 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3333 compound: subroutine
3334 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3336 '@{' statements '@}'
3342 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3343 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use. Note that
3344 the action is now at the end of its rule. Any mid-rule action can be
3345 converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and this is what Bison
3346 actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3349 @section Tracking Locations
3351 @cindex textual location
3352 @cindex location, textual
3354 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3355 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3356 especially symbol locations.
3358 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3359 actions to take when rules are matched.
3362 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3363 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3364 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3368 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3369 @cindex data type of locations
3370 @cindex default location type
3372 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3373 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3375 The type of locations is specified by defining a macro called @code{YYLTYPE}.
3376 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3380 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3389 @node Actions and Locations
3390 @subsection Actions and Locations
3391 @cindex location actions
3392 @cindex actions, location
3396 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3397 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3399 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3400 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3401 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3402 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3403 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3406 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3413 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3414 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3415 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3416 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3423 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3424 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3425 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3431 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3432 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3433 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3436 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3437 example above simply rewrites this way:
3450 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3451 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3452 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3458 @node Location Default Action
3459 @subsection Default Action for Locations
3460 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
3462 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
3463 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
3464 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
3465 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
3466 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
3467 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
3469 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
3470 dedicated code from semantic actions.
3472 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
3473 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
3474 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
3475 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
3476 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side. When processing
3477 a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations of
3478 the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
3479 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
3481 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
3485 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
3489 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
3490 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
3491 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
3492 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
3496 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
3497 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
3498 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
3499 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
3505 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
3506 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
3507 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
3509 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
3513 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
3514 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
3517 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
3518 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
3519 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
3520 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
3523 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
3524 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
3525 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
3526 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
3530 @section Bison Declarations
3531 @cindex declarations, Bison
3532 @cindex Bison declarations
3534 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
3535 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
3538 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
3539 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
3540 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
3541 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
3543 The first rule in the file also specifies the start symbol, by default.
3544 If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you must declare
3545 it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
3549 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
3550 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
3551 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
3552 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
3553 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
3554 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
3555 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
3556 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
3557 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
3558 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
3562 @subsection Token Type Names
3563 @cindex declaring token type names
3564 @cindex token type names, declaring
3565 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
3568 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
3574 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
3575 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
3576 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
3578 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
3579 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
3580 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
3583 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
3584 a decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
3585 following the token name:
3589 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
3593 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
3594 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
3595 with each other or with normal characters.
3597 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
3598 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
3599 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
3600 Than One Value Type}).
3606 %union @{ /* define stack type */
3610 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
3614 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
3615 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
3616 declaration which declares the name. For example:
3623 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
3624 equivalent literal string tokens:
3627 %token <operator> OR "||"
3628 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
3633 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
3634 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
3635 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
3636 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3638 @node Precedence Decl
3639 @subsection Operator Precedence
3640 @cindex precedence declarations
3641 @cindex declaring operator precedence
3642 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
3644 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
3645 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
3646 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
3647 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
3648 operator precedence.
3650 The syntax of a precedence declaration is the same as that of
3651 @code{%token}: either
3654 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
3661 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
3664 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
3665 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
3666 all the @var{symbols}:
3670 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
3671 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
3672 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
3673 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
3674 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
3675 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
3676 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
3677 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
3678 considered a syntax error.
3681 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
3682 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
3683 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
3684 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
3685 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
3689 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
3690 @cindex declaring value types
3691 @cindex value types, declaring
3694 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of possible
3695 data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is followed by a
3696 pair of braces containing the same thing that goes inside a @code{union} in
3711 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
3712 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
3713 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
3714 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3716 As an extension to @acronym{POSIX}, a tag is allowed after the
3717 @code{union}. For example:
3728 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
3729 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
3732 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
3733 a semicolon after the closing brace.
3736 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
3737 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
3738 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
3742 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
3743 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
3744 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
3747 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
3751 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
3752 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
3753 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
3754 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
3755 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
3758 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
3759 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
3760 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
3761 @code{<@var{type}>}.
3763 @node Initial Action Decl
3764 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
3765 @findex %initial-action
3767 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
3768 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
3771 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
3772 @findex %initial-action
3773 Declare that the @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
3774 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
3775 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the look-ahead --- and the
3776 @code{%parse-param}.
3779 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
3782 %parse-param @{ const char *filename @};
3785 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = filename;
3790 @node Destructor Decl
3791 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
3792 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
3795 Some symbols can be discarded by the parser. During error
3796 recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
3797 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file
3798 are discarded until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser
3799 runs out of memory, all the symbols on the stack must be discarded.
3800 Even if the parser succeeds, it must discard the start symbol.
3802 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
3803 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
3804 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells
3805 or protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
3807 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that
3808 is called when a symbol is discarded.
3810 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
3812 Invoke @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
3813 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic
3814 value associated with the discarded symbol. The additional
3815 parser parameters are also available
3816 (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
3818 @strong{Warning:} as of Bison 2.1, this feature is still
3819 experimental, as there has not been enough user feedback. In particular,
3820 the syntax might still change.
3830 %token <string> STRING
3831 %type <string> string
3832 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} STRING string
3836 guarantees that when a @code{STRING} or a @code{string} is discarded,
3837 its associated memory will be freed.
3839 Note that in the future, Bison might also consider that right hand side
3840 members that are not mentioned in the action can be destroyed. For
3844 comment: "/*" STRING "*/";
3848 the parser is entitled to destroy the semantic value of the
3849 @code{string}. Of course, this will not apply to the default action;
3853 typeless: string; // $$ = $1 does not apply; $1 is destroyed.
3854 typefull: string; // $$ = $1 applies, $1 is not destroyed.
3859 @cindex discarded symbols
3860 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
3864 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
3866 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
3868 the current look-ahead and the entire stack when the parser aborts
3869 (either via an explicit call to @code{YYABORT}, or as a consequence of
3870 a failed error recovery or of memory exhaustion), and
3872 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
3877 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
3878 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
3879 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
3880 @cindex warnings, preventing
3881 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
3885 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
3886 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
3887 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
3888 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
3889 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
3890 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
3892 The declaration looks like this:
3898 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should be
3899 no warning if there are @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no
3900 reduce/reduce conflicts. The usual warning is
3901 given if there are either more or fewer conflicts, or if there are any
3902 reduce/reduce conflicts.
3904 For normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more serious,
3905 and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
3906 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With @acronym{GLR} parsers, however,
3907 both shift/reduce and reduce/reduce are routine (otherwise, there
3908 would be no need to use @acronym{GLR} parsing). Therefore, it is also possible
3909 to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts in @acronym{GLR}
3910 parsers, using the declaration:
3916 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
3920 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
3921 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
3922 print the number of conflicts.
3925 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
3926 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
3927 go back to the beginning.
3930 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
3931 number which Bison printed.
3934 Now Bison will stop annoying you if you do not change the number of
3935 conflicts, but it will warn you again if changes in the grammar result
3936 in more or fewer conflicts.
3939 @subsection The Start-Symbol
3940 @cindex declaring the start symbol
3941 @cindex start symbol, declaring
3942 @cindex default start symbol
3945 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
3946 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
3947 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
3954 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
3955 @cindex reentrant parser
3957 @findex %pure-parser
3959 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
3960 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
3961 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
3962 for example, a non-reentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
3963 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a non-reentrant
3964 program must be called only within interlocks.
3966 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
3967 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
3968 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
3969 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
3970 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
3972 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
3973 declaration @code{%pure-parser} says that you want the parser to be
3974 reentrant. It looks like this:
3980 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
3981 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
3982 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
3983 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
3984 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs} also
3985 becomes local in @code{yyparse} (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
3986 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
3987 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
3989 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
3990 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
3994 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
3995 @cindex Bison declaration summary
3996 @cindex declaration summary
3997 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
3999 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4001 @deffn {Directive} %union
4002 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4003 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4006 @deffn {Directive} %token
4007 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4008 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4011 @deffn {Directive} %right
4012 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4013 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4016 @deffn {Directive} %left
4017 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4018 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4021 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4022 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4023 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4024 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4028 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4029 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4030 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4034 @deffn {Directive} %type
4035 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4036 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4039 @deffn {Directive} %start
4040 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4044 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4045 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4046 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4052 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4055 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4056 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
4057 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
4059 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4061 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4062 Write a header file containing macro definitions for the token type
4063 names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4064 If the parser output file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then this file
4065 is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4067 Unless @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro, the output header
4068 declares @code{YYSTYPE}. Therefore, if you are using a @code{%union}
4069 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}) with components
4070 that require other definitions, or if you have defined a
4071 @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic
4072 Values}), you need to arrange for these definitions to be propagated to
4073 all modules, e.g., by putting them in a
4074 prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
4075 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
4077 Unless your parser is pure, the output header declares @code{yylval}
4078 as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
4081 If you have also used locations, the output header declares
4082 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
4083 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations, ,Tracking
4086 This output file is normally essential if you wish to put the
4087 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
4088 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
4089 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes.
4090 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
4093 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
4094 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
4095 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
4098 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix="@var{prefix}"
4099 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names are
4100 chosen as if the input file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
4103 @deffn {Directive} %locations
4104 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
4105 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
4106 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
4107 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
4108 accurate syntax error messages.
4111 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix="@var{prefix}"
4112 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
4113 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
4114 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
4115 @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
4116 possible @code{yylloc}. For example, if you use
4117 @samp{%name-prefix="c_"}, the names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex},
4118 and so on. @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same
4123 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
4124 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
4125 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
4130 @deffn {Directive} %no-parser
4131 Do not include any C code in the parser file; generate tables only. The
4132 parser file contains just @code{#define} directives and static variable
4135 This option also tells Bison to write the C code for the grammar actions
4136 into a file named @file{@var{filename}.act}, in the form of a
4137 brace-surrounded body fit for a @code{switch} statement.
4140 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
4141 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
4142 file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the parser file so that
4143 the C compiler and debuggers will associate errors and object code with
4144 your source file (the grammar file). This directive causes them to
4145 associate errors with the parser file, treating it an independent source
4146 file in its own right.
4149 @deffn {Directive} %output="@var{filename}"
4150 Specify the @var{filename} for the parser file.
4153 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
4154 Request a pure (reentrant) parser program (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
4155 (Reentrant) Parser}).
4158 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
4159 Generate an array of token names in the parser file. The name of the
4160 array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is the name of the
4161 token whose internal Bison token code number is @var{i}. The first
4162 three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the predefined tokens
4164 @code{"error"}, and @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols
4165 defined in the grammar file.
4167 For single-character literal tokens and literal string tokens, the name
4168 in the table includes the single-quote or double-quote characters: for
4169 example, @code{"'+'"} is a single-character literal and @code{"\"<=\""}
4170 is a literal string token. All the characters of the literal string
4171 token appear verbatim in the string found in the table; even
4172 double-quote characters are not escaped. For example, if the token
4173 consists of three characters @samp{*"*}, its string in @code{yytname}
4174 contains @samp{"*"*"}. (In C, that would be written as
4177 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
4178 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
4179 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
4183 The highest token number, plus one.
4185 The number of nonterminal symbols.
4187 The number of grammar rules,
4189 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
4193 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
4194 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
4195 parser states and what is done for each type of look-ahead token in
4196 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
4200 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
4201 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
4202 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
4206 @node Multiple Parsers
4207 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
4209 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
4210 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
4211 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
4212 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
4214 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
4215 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
4216 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
4217 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
4218 names that do not conflict.
4220 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
4221 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
4222 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. For example, if you use @samp{-p c},
4223 the names become @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, and so on.
4225 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
4226 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
4227 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
4228 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
4229 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
4231 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the beginning
4232 of the parser source file, defining @code{yyparse} as
4233 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes one
4234 name for the other in the entire parser file.
4237 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
4238 @cindex C-language interface
4241 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
4242 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
4243 functions that it needs to use.
4245 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
4246 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
4247 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
4248 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
4251 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
4252 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
4254 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
4255 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
4256 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
4260 @node Parser Function
4261 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
4264 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
4265 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
4266 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
4267 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
4268 without reading further.
4271 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
4272 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
4273 is due to end-of-input).
4275 The value is 1 if parsing failed (return is due to a syntax error).
4278 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
4283 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
4288 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
4291 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
4292 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
4293 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
4295 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
4296 @findex %parse-param
4297 Declare that an argument declared by @code{argument-declaration} is an
4298 additional @code{yyparse} argument.
4299 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
4300 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
4301 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
4304 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
4307 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
4308 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
4312 Then call the parser like this:
4316 int nastiness, randomness;
4317 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
4318 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
4324 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
4327 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
4332 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
4334 @cindex lexical analyzer
4336 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
4337 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
4338 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
4339 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
4341 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the Bison
4342 grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source file, you
4343 need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be available there.
4344 To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run Bison, so that it will
4345 write these macro definitions into a separate header file
4346 @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include in the other source files
4347 that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
4350 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
4351 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
4352 of the token it has read.
4353 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
4354 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
4356 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
4357 in a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
4360 @node Calling Convention
4361 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
4363 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
4364 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
4365 signifies end-of-input.
4367 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
4368 in the parser file becomes a C macro whose definition is the proper
4369 numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can use the name
4370 to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
4372 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
4373 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
4374 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
4375 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
4376 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
4377 signifies end-of-input.
4379 Here is an example showing these things:
4386 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
4389 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
4390 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
4392 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
4398 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
4399 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
4401 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
4402 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
4406 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
4407 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
4408 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
4409 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
4412 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
4413 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
4414 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
4415 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
4416 token's characters are not escaped in any way; they appear verbatim in
4417 the contents of the string in the table.
4419 Here's code for looking up a token in @code{yytname}, assuming that the
4420 characters of the token are stored in @code{token_buffer}.
4423 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
4426 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
4427 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
4428 strlen (token_buffer))
4429 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
4430 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
4435 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
4436 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
4440 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
4443 In an ordinary (non-reentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
4444 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
4445 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
4446 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
4452 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
4453 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
4458 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
4459 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
4460 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
4461 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
4462 declaration looks like this:
4475 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
4480 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
4481 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
4486 @node Token Locations
4487 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
4490 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
4491 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the
4492 textual locations of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this
4493 information in @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to
4494 find the textual location of a token just parsed in the global variable
4495 @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that
4498 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
4499 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
4500 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
4501 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
4502 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
4505 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
4508 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
4510 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%pure-parser} to request a
4511 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
4512 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
4513 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
4514 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
4515 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
4520 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
4523 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
4524 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
4529 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
4530 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
4531 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
4535 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
4536 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
4539 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
4541 Declare that @code{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yylex}
4542 argument declaration.
4548 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
4549 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
4550 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
4554 results in the following signature:
4557 int yylex (int *nastiness);
4558 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
4561 If @code{%pure-parser} is added:
4564 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
4565 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
4569 and finally, if both @code{%pure-parser} and @code{%locations} are used:
4572 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
4573 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
4576 @node Error Reporting
4577 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
4578 @cindex error reporting function
4581 @cindex syntax error
4583 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
4584 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
4585 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
4586 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
4589 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
4590 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
4591 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
4592 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
4593 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
4595 @findex %error-verbose
4596 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison
4597 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
4598 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
4599 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
4601 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
4602 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
4603 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
4604 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
4605 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
4606 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
4608 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
4609 translated automatically from English to some other language before
4610 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
4612 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
4617 yyerror (char const *s)
4621 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
4626 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
4627 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
4628 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
4629 immediately return 1.
4631 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
4632 an access to the current location.
4633 This is indeed the case for the @acronym{GLR}
4634 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
4635 @samp{%locations %pure-parser} is passed then the prototypes for
4639 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
4640 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
4643 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
4646 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
4647 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
4650 Finally, @acronym{GLR} and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
4651 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
4652 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
4653 @code{%pure-parser} are pure. I.e.:
4656 /* Location tracking. */
4660 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
4662 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
4663 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
4667 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
4670 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
4671 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
4672 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
4673 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
4678 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
4679 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
4680 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
4681 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
4682 message is always passed last.
4684 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
4685 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
4686 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
4690 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
4691 encountered so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
4692 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
4693 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
4695 @node Action Features
4696 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
4697 @cindex summary, action features
4698 @cindex action features summary
4700 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
4701 are useful in actions.
4703 @deffn {Variable} $$
4704 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
4705 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
4708 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
4709 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
4710 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
4713 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
4714 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
4715 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
4716 Types of Values in Actions}.
4719 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
4720 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
4721 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
4722 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
4725 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
4726 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
4727 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
4730 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
4731 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
4732 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
4735 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
4737 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
4738 a single value, and only when there is no look-ahead token.
4739 It is also disallowed in @acronym{GLR} parsers.
4740 It installs a look-ahead token with token type @var{token} and
4741 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
4742 going to be reduced by this rule.
4744 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
4745 a look-ahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
4746 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
4749 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
4752 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
4754 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no look-ahead token.
4757 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
4759 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
4760 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
4761 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
4762 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
4763 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
4766 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
4767 This macro stands for an expression that has the value 1 when the parser
4768 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 the rest of the time.
4769 @xref{Error Recovery}.
4772 @deffn {Variable} yychar
4773 Variable containing the current look-ahead token. (In a pure parser,
4774 this is actually a local variable within @code{yyparse}.) When there is
4775 no look-ahead token, the value @code{YYEMPTY} is stored in the variable.
4776 @xref{Look-Ahead, ,Look-Ahead Tokens}.
4779 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
4780 Discard the current look-ahead token. This is useful primarily in
4781 error rules. @xref{Error Recovery}.
4784 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
4785 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
4786 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
4787 @xref{Error Recovery}.
4792 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
4793 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
4794 Tracking Locations}.
4796 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
4800 @c int first_line, last_line;
4801 @c int first_column, last_column;
4805 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
4806 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
4808 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
4809 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
4810 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
4813 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
4816 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
4818 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
4819 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
4820 Tracking Locations}.
4823 @node Internationalization
4824 @section Parser Internationalization
4825 @cindex internationalization
4831 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
4832 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
4833 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language.
4834 To make this work, the user should set the usual environment
4835 variables. @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU
4836 @code{gettext} utilities}. For
4837 example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might set
4838 the user's locale to French Canadian using the @acronym{UTF}-8
4839 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
4842 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
4843 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
4844 steps. Here we assume a package that uses @acronym{GNU} Autoconf and
4845 @acronym{GNU} Automake.
4849 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
4850 Into the directory containing the @acronym{GNU} Autoconf macros used
4851 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
4852 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
4853 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
4857 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
4862 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
4863 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
4864 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
4865 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
4866 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
4867 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
4868 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
4869 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
4870 Bison-generated parser.
4873 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
4874 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
4875 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
4879 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
4882 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
4883 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
4884 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
4888 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
4889 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
4890 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
4893 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
4899 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
4903 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
4909 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
4910 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
4911 @cindex algorithm of parser
4914 @cindex parser stack
4915 @cindex stack, parser
4917 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
4918 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
4919 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
4921 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
4922 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
4925 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
4926 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
4927 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
4928 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
4929 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
4930 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
4931 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
4933 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
4940 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
4941 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
4944 expr: expr '*' expr;
4948 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
4955 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
4956 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
4958 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
4959 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
4960 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
4962 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
4965 * Look-Ahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
4966 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
4967 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
4968 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
4969 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
4970 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
4971 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
4972 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
4973 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
4977 @section Look-Ahead Tokens
4978 @cindex look-ahead token
4980 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
4981 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
4982 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
4983 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
4984 token in order to decide what to do.
4986 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
4987 @dfn{look-ahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
4988 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
4989 the look-ahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
4990 should take place, the look-ahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
4991 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
4992 token type of the look-ahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
4995 Here is a simple case where look-ahead is needed. These three rules define
4996 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
4997 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
5014 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
5015 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
5016 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
5017 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
5018 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
5020 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
5021 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
5022 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
5023 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
5024 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
5025 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
5028 The current look-ahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
5029 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
5032 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
5034 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
5035 @cindex dangling @code{else}
5036 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
5038 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
5039 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
5045 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
5051 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
5052 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
5054 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the look-ahead token, the
5055 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
5056 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
5057 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
5060 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
5061 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
5062 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
5063 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
5064 contrast it with the other alternative.
5066 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
5067 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
5071 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
5073 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
5076 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
5077 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
5078 making these two inputs equivalent:
5081 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
5083 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
5086 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
5087 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
5088 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
5089 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
5090 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
5091 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
5092 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
5093 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
5095 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
5096 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration. There will be no
5097 warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts is exactly @var{n}.
5098 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
5100 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
5101 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
5102 rules. Here is a complete Bison input file that actually manifests the
5107 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
5119 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
5128 @section Operator Precedence
5129 @cindex operator precedence
5130 @cindex precedence of operators
5132 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
5133 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
5134 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
5135 shift and when to reduce.
5138 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
5139 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
5140 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
5141 * How Precedence:: How they work.
5144 @node Why Precedence
5145 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
5147 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
5148 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
5162 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
5163 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
5164 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
5165 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
5166 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
5167 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
5168 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
5171 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
5172 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
5173 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
5174 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
5175 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
5176 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
5177 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
5178 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
5181 @cindex associativity
5182 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
5183 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
5184 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
5185 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
5186 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
5187 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
5188 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the look-ahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
5189 makes right-associativity.
5191 @node Using Precedence
5192 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
5197 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
5198 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
5199 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
5200 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
5201 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
5202 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
5203 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
5206 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
5207 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
5208 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
5209 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
5210 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
5212 @node Precedence Examples
5213 @subsection Precedence Examples
5215 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
5223 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
5224 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
5225 declared with @code{'-'}:
5228 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
5234 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
5235 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
5236 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
5238 @node How Precedence
5239 @subsection How Precedence Works
5241 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
5242 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
5243 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
5244 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
5245 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
5246 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
5248 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
5249 of the rule being considered with that of the look-ahead token. If the
5250 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
5251 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
5252 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
5253 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
5254 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
5257 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
5258 the look-ahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
5260 @node Contextual Precedence
5261 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
5262 @cindex context-dependent precedence
5263 @cindex unary operator precedence
5264 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
5265 @cindex precedence, unary operator
5268 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
5269 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
5270 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
5271 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
5273 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
5274 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
5275 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
5276 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
5279 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
5280 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
5281 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
5282 modifier's syntax is:
5285 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
5289 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
5290 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
5291 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
5292 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
5293 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
5295 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
5296 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
5297 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
5307 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
5314 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
5319 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
5320 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
5321 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
5322 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
5324 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
5325 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
5326 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
5327 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
5329 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
5330 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
5331 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
5332 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
5333 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
5334 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
5336 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
5337 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
5341 @section Parser States
5342 @cindex finite-state machine
5343 @cindex parser state
5344 @cindex state (of parser)
5346 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
5347 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
5348 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
5349 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
5350 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
5352 Each time a look-ahead token is read, the current parser state together
5353 with the type of look-ahead token are looked up in a table. This table
5354 entry can say, ``Shift the look-ahead token.'' In this case, it also
5355 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
5356 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
5357 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
5358 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
5359 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
5362 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the look-ahead token
5363 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
5364 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
5367 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
5368 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
5369 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
5371 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
5372 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
5375 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
5376 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
5379 sequence: /* empty */
5380 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
5383 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
5386 maybeword: /* empty */
5387 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
5389 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
5394 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
5395 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
5396 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
5397 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
5398 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
5399 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
5401 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
5402 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
5403 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
5405 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
5406 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
5407 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
5408 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
5409 In this example, the output of the program changes.
5411 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
5412 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
5413 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
5414 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
5417 sequence: /* empty */
5418 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
5420 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
5424 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
5427 sequence: /* empty */
5429 | sequence redirects
5436 redirects:/* empty */
5437 | redirects redirect
5442 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
5443 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
5444 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
5445 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
5446 in infinitely many ways!
5448 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
5449 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
5450 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
5451 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
5453 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
5457 sequence: /* empty */
5463 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
5467 sequence: /* empty */
5469 | sequence redirects
5477 | redirects redirect
5481 @node Mystery Conflicts
5482 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
5484 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
5492 def: param_spec return_spec ','
5496 | name_list ':' type
5514 | name ',' name_list
5519 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
5520 of look-ahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
5521 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
5522 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is @acronym{LR}(1).
5524 @cindex @acronym{LR}(1)
5525 @cindex @acronym{LALR}(1)
5526 However, Bison, like most parser generators, cannot actually handle all
5527 @acronym{LR}(1) grammars. In this grammar, two contexts, that after
5529 at the beginning of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of
5530 a @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
5531 same. They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
5532 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
5533 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
5534 that the rules would require different look-ahead tokens in the two
5535 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
5536 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
5537 occurrence means that the grammar is not @acronym{LALR}(1).
5539 In general, it is better to fix deficiencies than to document them. But
5540 this particular deficiency is intrinsically hard to fix; parser
5541 generators that can handle @acronym{LR}(1) grammars are hard to write
5543 produce parsers that are very large. In practice, Bison is more useful
5546 When the problem arises, you can often fix it by identifying the two
5547 parser states that are being confused, and adding something to make them
5548 look distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
5549 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
5560 /* This rule is never used. */
5566 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
5567 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
5568 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
5569 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
5570 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
5571 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
5573 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
5574 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
5575 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
5576 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
5577 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
5578 rather than the one for @code{name}.
5583 | name_list ':' type
5591 For a more detailed exposition of @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers and parser
5592 generators, please see:
5593 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of
5594 @acronym{LALR}(1) Look-Ahead Sets, @cite{@acronym{ACM} Transactions on
5595 Programming Languages and Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982),
5596 pp.@: 615--649 @uref{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/69622.357187}.
5598 @node Generalized LR Parsing
5599 @section Generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) Parsing
5600 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
5601 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
5602 @cindex ambiguous grammars
5603 @cindex non-deterministic parsing
5605 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
5606 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
5607 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of look-ahead.
5608 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
5609 context-free languages.
5610 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
5611 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
5612 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
5613 look-ahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
5614 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
5615 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
5616 there are languages where Bison's particular choice of how to
5617 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
5619 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
5620 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
5621 Generalized @acronym{LR} (or @acronym{GLR}). A Bison @acronym{GLR}
5622 parser uses the same basic
5623 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
5624 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
5625 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
5626 reduce-reduce conflict. When a @acronym{GLR} parser encounters such a
5628 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
5629 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
5630 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
5631 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
5632 a Bison @acronym{GLR} parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
5634 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
5635 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
5636 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
5637 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
5638 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
5639 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
5640 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
5641 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
5642 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
5643 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
5644 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
5647 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
5648 states to having one, it reverts to the normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing
5649 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
5650 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
5651 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
5652 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
5653 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
5654 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
5655 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
5656 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
5657 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
5658 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
5660 It is possible to use a data structure for the @acronym{GLR} parsing tree that
5661 permits the processing of any @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar in linear time (in the
5662 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
5663 @acronym{LALR}(1)) grammar in
5664 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
5665 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
5666 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
5667 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
5668 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or non-deterministic
5669 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
5670 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
5671 Usually, non-determinism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
5672 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
5673 structure should generally be adequate. On @acronym{LALR}(1) portions of a
5674 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the default
5677 For a more detailed exposition of @acronym{GLR} parsers, please see: Elizabeth
5678 Scott, Adrian Johnstone and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain, Tomita-Style
5679 Generalised @acronym{LR} Parsers, Royal Holloway, University of
5680 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12,
5681 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps},
5684 @node Memory Management
5685 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
5686 @cindex memory exhaustion
5687 @cindex memory management
5688 @cindex stack overflow
5689 @cindex parser stack overflow
5690 @cindex overflow of parser stack
5692 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
5693 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
5694 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
5696 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
5697 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
5698 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
5701 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
5702 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
5703 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
5704 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
5706 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
5707 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
5708 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
5709 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
5710 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
5711 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
5713 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
5714 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
5715 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
5718 @cindex default stack limit
5719 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
5723 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
5724 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the C
5725 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser, this value must be a compile-time constant
5726 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
5727 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
5729 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
5731 @c FIXME: C++ output.
5732 Because of semantical differences between C and C++, the
5733 @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
5734 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
5735 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
5736 this deficiency in a future release.
5738 @node Error Recovery
5739 @chapter Error Recovery
5740 @cindex error recovery
5741 @cindex recovery from errors
5743 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
5744 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
5745 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
5748 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
5749 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
5750 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
5751 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
5752 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
5753 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
5754 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
5757 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
5758 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
5759 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
5760 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
5761 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
5762 in the current context, the parse can continue.
5767 stmnts: /* empty string */
5773 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
5774 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
5776 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
5777 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
5778 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
5779 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
5780 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
5781 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
5782 applicable in the ordinary way.
5784 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
5785 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
5786 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
5787 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
5788 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
5789 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
5790 look-ahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
5791 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
5792 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
5793 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
5794 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
5795 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
5797 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
5798 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
5799 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
5802 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
5805 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
5806 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
5807 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
5808 spurious error message:
5811 primary: '(' expr ')'
5817 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
5818 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
5819 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
5820 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
5821 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
5822 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
5823 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
5826 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
5827 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
5828 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
5829 error messages resume.
5831 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
5832 as any other rules can.
5835 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
5836 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
5837 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
5838 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
5841 The previous look-ahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
5842 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
5843 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
5846 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
5847 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
5848 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
5849 probably correct. The previous look-ahead token ought to be discarded
5850 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
5852 @vindex YYRECOVERING
5853 The macro @code{YYRECOVERING} stands for an expression that has the
5854 value 1 when the parser is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 the
5855 rest of the time. A value of 1 indicates that error messages are
5856 currently suppressed for new syntax errors.
5858 @node Context Dependency
5859 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
5861 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
5862 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
5863 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
5864 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
5868 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
5869 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
5870 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
5871 error recovery rules must be written.
5874 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
5875 neither clean nor robust.)
5877 @node Semantic Tokens
5878 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
5880 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
5881 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
5887 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
5888 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
5889 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
5891 The method used in @acronym{GNU} C is to have two different token types,
5892 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
5893 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
5894 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
5895 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
5897 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
5898 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
5899 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
5900 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
5901 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
5902 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
5903 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
5905 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
5906 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
5907 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
5908 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
5912 typedef int foo, bar;
5915 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
5916 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
5921 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
5922 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
5924 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
5925 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
5926 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
5927 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
5928 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
5932 declarator maybeasm '='
5934 | declarator maybeasm
5938 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
5940 | notype_declarator maybeasm
5945 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
5946 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
5947 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
5949 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
5950 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
5951 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
5952 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
5953 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
5954 the syntactic context.
5956 @node Lexical Tie-ins
5957 @section Lexical Tie-ins
5958 @cindex lexical tie-in
5960 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
5961 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
5964 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
5965 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
5966 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
5967 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
5968 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
5975 void yyerror (char const *);
5989 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
6003 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
6004 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
6005 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
6007 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the parser file
6008 is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue, ,The Prologue}).
6009 You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey the flag.
6011 @node Tie-in Recovery
6012 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
6014 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
6015 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6017 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
6018 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
6019 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
6020 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
6024 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
6031 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
6032 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
6033 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
6034 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
6035 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
6037 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
6039 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
6040 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
6041 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
6053 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
6054 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
6055 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
6056 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
6058 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
6059 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
6060 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
6061 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
6062 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
6063 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
6066 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
6069 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
6071 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
6072 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
6073 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
6074 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
6075 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
6076 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
6079 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
6080 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
6084 @section Understanding Your Parser
6086 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
6087 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
6088 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
6089 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
6090 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a @acronym{VCG}
6093 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
6094 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
6095 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
6096 the parser output file name, and adding @samp{.output} instead.
6097 Therefore, if the input file is @file{foo.y}, then the parser file is
6098 called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As a consequence, the verbose
6099 output file is called @file{foo.output}.
6101 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
6118 @command{bison} reports:
6121 calc.y: warning: 1 useless nonterminal and 1 useless rule
6122 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: useless nonterminal: useless
6123 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: useless rule: useless: STR
6124 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
6127 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
6128 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
6129 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
6130 interpretation is the same.
6132 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
6133 to precedence and/or associativity:
6136 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
6137 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
6138 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
6143 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
6146 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
6147 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
6148 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
6149 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
6153 @cindex token, useless
6154 @cindex useless token
6155 @cindex nonterminal, useless
6156 @cindex useless nonterminal
6157 @cindex rule, useless
6158 @cindex useless rule
6159 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
6160 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
6161 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
6162 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``not used''
6166 Useless nonterminals:
6169 Terminals which are not used:
6177 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
6183 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
6184 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
6185 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
6186 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
6187 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
6192 and reports the uses of the symbols:
6195 Terminals, with rules where they appear
6205 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
6210 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
6215 @cindex pointed rule
6216 @cindex rule, pointed
6217 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
6218 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
6219 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
6220 that the input cursor.
6225 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
6227 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6232 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
6233 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
6234 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
6235 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
6236 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
6237 symbol, and the look-ahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
6238 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
6239 look-ahead triggers a syntax error.''
6241 @cindex core, item set
6242 @cindex item set core
6243 @cindex kernel, item set
6244 @cindex item set core
6245 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
6246 report lists @code{NUM} as a look-ahead token because @code{NUM} can be
6247 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
6248 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
6249 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
6250 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
6256 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
6257 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
6258 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
6259 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
6260 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
6261 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
6263 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6274 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
6276 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
6280 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the look-ahead token
6281 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
6282 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
6283 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
6288 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
6289 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
6290 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6291 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6292 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6294 $ shift, and go to state 3
6295 '+' shift, and go to state 4
6296 '-' shift, and go to state 5
6297 '*' shift, and go to state 6
6298 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6302 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
6303 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the look-ahead if
6304 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
6305 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
6306 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
6307 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
6309 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
6315 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
6321 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
6322 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
6324 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
6330 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
6332 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6338 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
6340 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6346 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
6348 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6354 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
6356 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6361 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
6367 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
6368 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
6369 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6370 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6371 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6373 '*' shift, and go to state 6
6374 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6376 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
6377 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
6380 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the look-ahead @samp{/}:
6381 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
6382 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
6383 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
6384 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
6385 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
6386 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
6387 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
6389 Because in @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
6390 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
6391 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
6394 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
6395 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
6396 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
6397 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
6398 possible, the look-ahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
6399 one such state: if the look-ahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
6400 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
6401 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
6402 look-ahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
6403 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
6404 with some set of possible look-ahead tokens. When run with
6405 @option{--report=look-ahead}, Bison specifies these look-ahead tokens:
6410 exp -> exp . '+' exp [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
6411 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
6412 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6413 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6414 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6416 '*' shift, and go to state 6
6417 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6419 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
6420 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
6423 The remaining states are similar:
6428 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
6429 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6430 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
6431 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6432 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6434 '*' shift, and go to state 6
6435 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6437 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
6438 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
6442 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
6443 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6444 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6445 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
6446 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6448 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6450 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
6451 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
6455 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
6456 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6457 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6458 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6459 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
6461 '+' shift, and go to state 4
6462 '-' shift, and go to state 5
6463 '*' shift, and go to state 6
6464 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6466 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
6467 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
6468 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
6469 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
6470 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
6474 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
6475 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
6476 @samp{*}, but also because the
6477 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
6481 @section Tracing Your Parser
6484 @cindex tracing the parser
6486 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
6487 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
6489 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
6492 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
6494 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
6495 parser. This is compliant with @acronym{POSIX} Yacc. You could use
6496 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
6497 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
6500 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
6501 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
6502 ,Invoking Bison}). This is @acronym{POSIX} compliant too.
6504 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
6506 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
6507 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
6508 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
6509 preprocessor. Unless @acronym{POSIX} and Yacc portability matter to
6511 the preferred solution.
6514 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
6517 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
6518 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
6519 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and
6520 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
6521 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
6522 and @code{YYPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
6524 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
6525 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
6526 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
6527 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
6529 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
6530 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
6531 messages tell you these things:
6535 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
6538 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
6539 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
6542 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
6543 of the state stack afterward.
6546 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
6547 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6548 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
6549 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
6550 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
6551 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
6552 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
6553 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
6554 grammar are to blame.
6556 The parser file is a C program and you can use C debuggers on it, but it's
6557 not easy to interpret what it is doing. The parser function is a
6558 finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from the actions it executes
6559 the same code over and over. Only the values of variables show where in
6560 the grammar it is working.
6563 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
6564 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
6565 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
6566 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
6567 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
6568 value (from @code{yylval}).
6570 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
6571 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Decl, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
6575 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
6576 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
6579 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
6582 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
6585 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
6586 else if (type == NUM)
6587 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
6591 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
6594 @chapter Invoking Bison
6595 @cindex invoking Bison
6596 @cindex Bison invocation
6597 @cindex options for invoking Bison
6599 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
6605 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
6606 @samp{.y}. The parser file's name is made by replacing the @samp{.y}
6607 with @samp{.tab.c}. Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} filename yields
6608 @file{foo.tab.c}, and the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} filename yields
6609 @file{hack/foo.tab.c}. It's also possible, in case you are writing
6610 C++ code instead of C in your grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp}
6611 or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the output files will take an extension like
6612 the given one as input (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and
6613 @file{foo.tab.c++}).
6614 This feature takes effect with all options that manipulate filenames like
6615 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
6620 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
6623 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
6626 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
6629 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
6631 For compatibility with @acronym{POSIX}, the standard Bison
6632 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
6633 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
6636 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
6637 in alphabetical order by short options.
6638 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
6639 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
6643 @section Bison Options
6645 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
6646 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
6647 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
6648 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
6649 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
6652 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
6653 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
6656 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
6662 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
6666 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
6668 @item --print-localedir
6669 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
6674 Equivalent to @samp{-o y.tab.c}; the parser output file is called
6675 @file{y.tab.c}, and the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and
6676 @file{y.tab.h}. The purpose of this option is to imitate Yacc's output
6677 file name conventions. Thus, the following shell script can substitute
6678 for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script for
6679 compatibility with @acronym{POSIX}:
6692 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
6693 Specify the skeleton to use. You probably don't need this option unless
6694 you are developing Bison.
6698 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
6699 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
6700 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
6703 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6705 @item -p @var{prefix}
6706 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
6707 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix="@var{prefix}"} was specified.
6708 @xref{Decl Summary}.
6712 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser file.
6713 Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser file so that the C compiler
6714 and debuggers will associate errors with your source file, the
6715 grammar file. This option causes them to associate errors with the
6716 parser file, treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
6720 Pretend that @code{%no-parser} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6723 @itemx --token-table
6724 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6733 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
6734 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
6735 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6737 @item --defines=@var{defines-file}
6738 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
6740 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
6741 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
6742 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e, specify prefix to use
6743 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6745 @item -r @var{things}
6746 @itemx --report=@var{things}
6747 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
6748 separated list of @var{things} among:
6752 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
6753 @acronym{LALR} automaton.
6756 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
6757 each rule's look-ahead set.
6760 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
6761 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
6764 For instance, on the following grammar
6768 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e, write an extra output
6769 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
6770 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6772 @item -o @var{filename}
6773 @itemx --output=@var{filename}
6774 Specify the @var{filename} for the parser file.
6776 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{filename} as
6777 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
6780 Output a @acronym{VCG} definition of the @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar
6781 automaton computed by Bison. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
6782 @acronym{VCG} output file will
6785 @item --graph=@var{graph-file}
6786 The behavior of @var{--graph} is the same than @samp{-g}. The only
6787 difference is that it has an optional argument which is the name of
6788 the output graph filename.
6791 @node Option Cross Key
6792 @section Option Cross Key
6794 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
6795 the corresponding short option.
6798 \def\leaderfill{\leaders\hbox to 1em{\hss.\hss}\hfill}
6801 \line{ --debug \leaderfill -t}
6802 \line{ --defines \leaderfill -d}
6803 \line{ --file-prefix \leaderfill -b}
6804 \line{ --graph \leaderfill -g}
6805 \line{ --help \leaderfill -h}
6806 \line{ --name-prefix \leaderfill -p}
6807 \line{ --no-lines \leaderfill -l}
6808 \line{ --no-parser \leaderfill -n}
6809 \line{ --output \leaderfill -o}
6810 \line{ --print-localedir}
6811 \line{ --token-table \leaderfill -k}
6812 \line{ --verbose \leaderfill -v}
6813 \line{ --version \leaderfill -V}
6814 \line{ --yacc \leaderfill -y}
6821 --defines=@var{defines-file} -d
6822 --file-prefix=@var{prefix} -b @var{file-prefix}
6823 --graph=@var{graph-file} -d
6825 --name-prefix=@var{prefix} -p @var{name-prefix}
6828 --output=@var{outfile} -o @var{outfile}
6838 @section Yacc Library
6840 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
6841 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
6842 implementations are normally not useful, but @acronym{POSIX} requires
6843 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
6844 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
6845 library is distributed under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} General
6846 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
6848 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
6849 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
6852 int yyerror (char const *);
6855 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
6856 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
6857 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
6863 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
6865 @node C++ Language Interface
6866 @chapter C++ Language Interface
6869 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
6870 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
6874 @section C++ Parsers
6877 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
6878 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
6879 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
6880 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
6881 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
6884 @node C++ Bison Interface
6885 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
6886 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
6890 The C++ parser @acronym{LALR}(1) skeleton is named @file{lalr1.cc}. To select
6891 it, you may either pass the option @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc} to
6892 Bison, or include the directive @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"} in the
6893 grammar preamble. When run, @command{bison} will create several
6898 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
6899 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
6902 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
6904 @item @var{filename}.hh
6905 @itemx @var{filename}.cc
6906 The declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class.
6907 @var{filename} is the name of the output file. It follows the same
6908 rules as with regular C parsers.
6910 Note that @file{@var{filename}.hh} is @emph{mandatory}, the C++ cannot
6911 work without the parser class declaration. Therefore, you must either
6912 pass @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
6913 @samp{%defines} directive.
6916 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
6917 for a complete and accurate documentation.
6919 @node C++ Semantic Values
6920 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
6921 @c - No objects in unions
6923 @c - Printer and destructor
6925 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
6926 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
6927 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
6928 within pseudo-unions (variants) might be implemented to alleviate
6929 these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
6932 The name @code{YYSTYPE} also denotes @samp{union YYSTYPE}. You may
6933 forward declare it just with @samp{union YYSTYPE;}.
6935 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
6936 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
6937 to such objects are allowed.
6940 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
6941 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
6942 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
6946 @node C++ Location Values
6947 @subsection C++ Location Values
6951 @c - %define "filename_type" "const symbol::Symbol"
6953 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
6954 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
6955 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
6956 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
6957 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
6959 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} filename
6960 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
6961 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
6962 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
6963 "filename_type" "@var{type}"}.
6966 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
6967 The line, starting at 1.
6970 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
6971 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
6974 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
6975 The column, starting at 0.
6978 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
6979 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
6982 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
6983 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
6984 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
6985 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
6986 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
6989 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
6990 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
6991 @samp{@var{filename}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
6992 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{filename} is null.
6995 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
6996 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
6997 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
7000 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
7001 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
7002 Advance the @code{end} position.
7005 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
7006 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
7007 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
7008 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
7011 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
7012 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
7016 @node C++ Parser Interface
7017 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
7018 @c - define parser_class_name
7020 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
7022 @c - Reporting errors
7024 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
7025 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
7026 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
7027 @samp{%define "parser_class_name" "@var{name}"}. The interface of
7028 this class is detailled below. It can be extended using the
7029 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
7030 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
7031 additional argument for its constructor.
7033 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_value_type}
7034 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_value_type}
7035 The types for semantics value and locations.
7038 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
7039 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
7040 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
7043 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
7044 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
7047 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
7048 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
7049 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
7053 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
7054 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
7055 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
7056 or non-zero, full tracing.
7059 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
7060 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
7061 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
7062 described by @var{m}.
7066 @node C++ Scanner Interface
7067 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
7068 @c - prefix for yylex.
7069 @c - Pure interface to yylex
7072 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
7073 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
7074 @code{%pure-parser} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
7076 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_value_type& @var{yylval}, location_type& @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
7077 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
7078 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
7079 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
7083 @node A Complete C++ Example
7084 @section A Complete C++ Example
7086 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
7087 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
7088 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
7089 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
7090 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
7091 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
7092 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
7093 actually easier to interface with.
7096 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
7097 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
7098 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
7099 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
7100 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
7103 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
7104 @subsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
7106 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
7107 expression, possibily preceded by variable assignments. An
7108 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
7109 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
7110 of valid input follows.
7114 seven := one + two * three
7118 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
7119 @subsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
7121 @c - A place to store error messages
7122 @c - A place for the result
7124 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
7125 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
7126 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
7127 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
7128 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
7129 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
7130 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
7132 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
7133 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
7134 required standard library components.
7136 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7138 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
7139 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
7145 Then come forward declarations. Because the parser uses the parsing
7146 driver and reciprocally, simple inclusions of header files will not
7147 do. Because the driver's declaration is the one that will be imported
7148 by the rest of the project, it is saner to forward declare the
7149 parser's information here.
7151 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7153 // Forward declarations.
7158 class calcxx_parser;
7160 class calcxx_driver;
7164 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
7165 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
7166 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
7167 factor both as follows.
7169 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7171 // Announce to Flex the prototype we want for lexing function, ...
7173 int yylex (YYSTYPE* yylval, yy::location* yylloc, calcxx_driver& driver)
7174 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
7179 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
7182 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7184 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
7189 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
7191 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
7197 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
7198 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
7201 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7203 // Handling the scanner.
7206 bool trace_scanning;
7210 Similarly for the parser itself.
7212 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7214 // Handling the parser.
7215 void parse (const std::string& f);
7221 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
7222 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
7223 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
7224 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
7226 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7229 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
7230 void error (const std::string& m);
7232 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
7235 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
7236 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
7237 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
7238 messages and set error state.
7240 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
7242 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
7243 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
7245 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
7246 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
7248 variables["one"] = 1;
7249 variables["two"] = 2;
7252 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
7257 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
7261 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
7262 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
7268 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
7270 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
7274 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
7276 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
7281 @subsection Calc++ Parser
7283 The parser definition file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking
7284 for the C++ skeleton, the creation of the parser header file, and
7285 specifies the name of the parser class. It then includes the required
7288 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7290 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
7291 %define "parser_class_name" "calcxx_parser"
7295 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
7300 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
7301 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
7304 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7306 // The parsing context.
7307 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
7308 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
7312 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
7313 first location's file name. Afterwards new locations are computed
7314 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
7315 automatically propagated.
7317 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7322 // Initialize the initial location.
7323 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
7328 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
7331 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7338 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
7341 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7352 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
7353 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
7354 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
7355 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
7358 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7360 %token YYEOF 0 "end of file"
7361 %token TOKEN_ASSIGN ":="
7362 %token <sval> TOKEN_IDENTIFIER "identifier"
7363 %token <ival> TOKEN_NUMBER "number"
7364 %type <ival> exp "expression"
7368 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
7371 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7373 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
7374 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
7376 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} "number" "expression"
7380 The grammar itself is straightforward.
7382 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7386 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
7388 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
7389 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
7391 assignment: TOKEN_IDENTIFIER ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; @};
7395 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
7396 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
7397 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
7398 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
7399 | TOKEN_IDENTIFIER @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; @}
7400 | TOKEN_NUMBER @{ $$ = $1; @};
7405 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
7408 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7411 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
7412 const std::string& m)
7414 driver.error (l, m);
7418 @node Calc++ Scanner
7419 @subsection Calc++ Scanner
7421 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
7422 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
7424 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7426 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
7428 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
7429 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
7434 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
7435 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
7436 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
7437 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
7439 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7441 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
7445 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
7447 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7449 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
7455 The following paragraph suffices to track locations acurately. Each
7456 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
7457 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
7458 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
7459 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
7460 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
7461 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
7463 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7466 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
7472 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
7473 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
7477 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report
7480 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7482 [-+*/] return yytext[0];
7483 ":=" return TOKEN_ASSIGN;
7484 @{int@} yylval->ival = atoi (yytext); return TOKEN_NUMBER;
7485 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return TOKEN_IDENTIFIER;
7486 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
7491 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
7492 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
7494 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7497 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
7499 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
7500 if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
7501 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file);
7505 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
7511 @node Calc++ Top Level
7512 @subsection Calc++ Top Level
7514 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
7516 @comment file: calc++.cc
7519 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
7522 main (int argc, const char* argv[])
7524 calcxx_driver driver;
7525 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
7526 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
7527 driver.trace_parsing = true;
7528 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
7529 driver.trace_scanning = true;
7532 driver.parse (*argv);
7533 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
7538 @c ================================================= FAQ
7541 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
7542 @cindex frequently asked questions
7545 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
7549 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
7550 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
7551 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
7552 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
7555 @node Memory Exhausted
7556 @section Memory Exhausted
7559 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
7560 message. What can I do?
7563 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
7566 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
7567 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
7569 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
7570 following typical questions:
7573 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
7574 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
7575 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
7582 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
7583 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
7584 although I did specify I needed a @code{%pure-parser}.
7587 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
7588 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
7589 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
7590 demonstration, consider the following source file,
7591 @file{first-line.l}:
7599 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
7602 yyparse (char const *file)
7604 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
7607 /* One token only. */
7609 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
7624 If the file @file{input} contains
7632 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
7635 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
7636 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
7637 $ @kbd{./first-line}
7642 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
7643 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
7644 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
7645 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
7646 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
7647 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
7648 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
7649 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
7652 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
7653 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
7654 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
7655 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
7657 @node Strings are Destroyed
7658 @section Strings are Destroyed
7661 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
7662 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
7663 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
7666 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
7667 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
7668 of scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
7673 char *yylval = NULL;
7676 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
7682 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
7683 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
7684 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
7685 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
7690 If you compile and run this code, you get:
7693 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
7694 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
7695 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
7701 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
7702 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
7703 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
7704 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
7705 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
7706 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
7709 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
7710 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
7711 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
7716 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
7717 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
7720 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
7721 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
7724 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
7725 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
7726 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
7727 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
7728 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
7729 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
7730 execute simple instructions one after the others.
7732 @cindex abstract syntax tree
7733 @cindex @acronym{AST}
7734 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
7735 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
7736 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
7737 or @dfn{@acronym{AST}} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
7738 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
7739 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
7742 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
7743 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
7747 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
7749 @node Table of Symbols
7750 @appendix Bison Symbols
7751 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
7752 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
7754 @deffn {Variable} @@$
7755 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
7756 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
7759 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
7760 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
7761 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
7764 @deffn {Variable} $$
7765 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
7769 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
7770 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
7771 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
7774 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
7775 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
7776 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
7777 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
7780 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
7781 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
7782 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied directly to
7783 the output file uninterpreted. Such code forms the prologue of the input
7784 file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
7788 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
7789 Comment delimiters, as in C.
7792 @deffn {Delimiter} :
7793 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
7797 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
7798 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
7801 @deffn {Delimiter} |
7802 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
7803 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
7806 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
7807 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
7808 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
7809 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
7812 @deffn {Directive} %debug
7813 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7817 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
7818 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
7819 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
7824 @deffn {Directive} %defines
7825 Bison declaration to create a header file meant for the scanner.
7826 @xref{Decl Summary}.
7829 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
7830 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
7831 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
7834 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
7835 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
7836 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
7837 @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
7840 @deffn {Symbol} $end
7841 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
7842 used in the grammar.
7845 @deffn {Symbol} error
7846 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
7847 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
7848 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
7849 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
7850 token @code{error} becomes the current look-ahead token. Actions
7851 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the look-ahead
7852 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
7853 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7856 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
7857 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
7858 when @code{yyerror} is called.
7861 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix="@var{prefix}"
7862 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
7866 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
7867 Bison declaration to produce a @acronym{GLR} parser. @xref{GLR
7868 Parsers, ,Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
7871 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
7872 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
7875 @deffn {Directive} %left
7876 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
7877 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
7880 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
7881 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
7882 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
7886 @deffn {Directive} %merge
7887 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
7888 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
7889 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
7890 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
7893 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix="@var{prefix}"
7894 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7898 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
7899 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
7900 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
7905 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
7906 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
7907 parser file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7910 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
7911 Bison declaration to assign non-associativity to token(s).
7912 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
7915 @deffn {Directive} %output="@var{filename}"
7916 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser file. @xref{Decl
7920 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
7921 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
7922 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
7923 Function @code{yyparse}}.
7926 @deffn {Directive} %prec
7927 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
7928 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
7931 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
7932 Bison declaration to request a pure (reentrant) parser.
7933 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
7936 @deffn {Directive} %right
7937 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
7938 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
7941 @deffn {Directive} %start
7942 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
7946 @deffn {Directive} %token
7947 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
7948 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
7951 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
7952 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser file.
7953 @xref{Decl Summary}.
7956 @deffn {Directive} %type
7957 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
7958 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
7961 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
7962 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
7963 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
7967 @deffn {Directive} %union
7968 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
7969 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
7972 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
7973 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
7974 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
7975 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
7976 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
7979 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
7980 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
7981 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
7982 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
7985 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
7986 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a look-ahead
7987 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7990 @deffn {Variable} yychar
7991 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the current
7992 look-ahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
7993 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
7994 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7997 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
7998 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
7999 look-ahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
8002 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
8003 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
8004 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8007 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
8008 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
8009 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
8010 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8013 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
8014 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
8015 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
8018 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
8019 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
8020 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
8021 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
8022 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
8025 @deffn {Function} yyerror
8026 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
8027 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
8028 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
8031 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
8032 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
8033 to request verbose, specific error message strings
8034 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
8035 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
8036 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred.
8039 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
8040 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
8041 @xref{Memory Management}.
8044 @deffn {Function} yylex
8045 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
8046 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
8050 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
8051 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
8052 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. he use of this
8053 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
8054 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
8057 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
8058 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
8059 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
8060 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
8061 @code{yylex}.) You can ignore this variable if you don't use the
8062 @samp{@@} feature in the grammar actions. @xref{Token Locations,
8063 ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
8066 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
8067 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
8068 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
8071 @deffn {Variable} yylval
8072 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
8073 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
8074 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
8075 @code{yylex}.) @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
8078 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
8079 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
8083 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
8084 Global variable which Bison increments each time there is a syntax error.
8085 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}.)
8086 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
8089 @deffn {Function} yyparse
8090 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
8091 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
8094 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
8095 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
8096 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
8097 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
8098 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
8101 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
8102 Macro whose value indicates whether the parser is recovering from a
8103 syntax error. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8106 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
8107 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the C
8108 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
8109 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
8110 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
8111 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
8112 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
8114 If you define @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} to 1, it is your
8115 responsibility to make sure that @code{alloca} is visible, e.g., by
8116 using @acronym{GCC} or by including @code{<stdlib.h>}. Furthermore,
8117 in the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
8118 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
8119 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
8120 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
8121 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
8122 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
8123 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
8126 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
8127 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
8128 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
8136 @item Backus-Naur Form (@acronym{BNF}; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
8137 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
8138 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
8139 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
8140 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
8142 @item Context-free grammars
8143 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
8144 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
8145 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
8146 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
8149 @item Dynamic allocation
8150 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
8151 compile time or on entry to a function.
8154 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
8155 character string of length zero.
8157 @item Finite-state stack machine
8158 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
8159 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
8160 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
8161 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
8162 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
8163 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
8165 @item Generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR})
8166 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
8167 that are not @acronym{LALR}(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
8168 usual @acronym{LALR}(1)
8169 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
8170 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
8171 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
8172 @acronym{LR} Parsing}.
8175 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
8176 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
8177 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
8179 @item Infix operator
8180 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
8181 performs some operation.
8184 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
8186 @item Language construct
8187 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
8188 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
8189 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
8191 @item Left associativity
8192 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
8193 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
8194 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
8196 @item Left recursion
8197 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
8198 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
8201 @item Left-to-right parsing
8202 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
8203 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
8205 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
8206 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
8207 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
8209 @item Lexical tie-in
8210 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
8211 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
8213 @item Literal string token
8214 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
8216 @item Look-ahead token
8217 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Look-Ahead, ,Look-Ahead
8220 @item @acronym{LALR}(1)
8221 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
8222 generators) can handle; a subset of @acronym{LR}(1). @xref{Mystery
8223 Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
8225 @item @acronym{LR}(1)
8226 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
8227 look-ahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
8229 @item Nonterminal symbol
8230 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
8231 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
8232 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
8235 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
8236 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
8239 @item Postfix operator
8240 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
8241 performs some operation.
8244 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
8245 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
8249 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
8250 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
8251 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
8253 @item Reverse polish notation
8254 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
8256 @item Right recursion
8257 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
8258 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
8262 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
8263 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
8264 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
8267 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
8268 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
8269 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
8271 @item Single-character literal
8272 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
8273 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
8276 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
8277 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
8278 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
8279 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
8282 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
8283 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
8284 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
8287 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
8288 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
8291 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
8292 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
8293 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
8294 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
8296 @item Terminal symbol
8297 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
8298 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
8299 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
8302 @node Copying This Manual
8303 @appendix Copying This Manual
8306 * GNU Free Documentation License:: License for copying this manual.
8318 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout
8319 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex
8320 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry
8321 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa
8322 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc
8323 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Gen Comp Expr ltcalc mfcalc Decl Symtab yylex
8324 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref
8325 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex
8326 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge
8327 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG
8328 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit
8329 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok
8330 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr preg yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln
8331 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym
8332 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof
8333 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum
8334 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype
8335 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless typefull yynerrs
8336 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES
8337 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param
8338 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP
8339 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword
8340 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH
8341 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm VCG notype
8342 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args
8343 @c LocalWords: YYPRINTF infile ypp yxx outfile itemx vcg tex leaderfill
8344 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll
8345 @c LocalWords: yyrestart nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST
8346 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex