1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual is for @acronym{GNU} Bison (version @value{VERSION},
34 @value{UPDATED}), the @acronym{GNU} parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1998,
37 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A @acronym{GNU} Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``@acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The @acronym{FSF}'s Back-Cover Text is: ``You have freedom to copy
49 and modify this @acronym{GNU} Manual, like @acronym{GNU} software.
50 Copies published by the Free Software Foundation raise funds for
51 @acronym{GNU} development.''
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). @acronym{GNU} parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
75 @acronym{ISBN} 1-882114-44-2
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The @acronym{GNU} General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser source file).
107 * C++ Language Interface:: Creating C++ parser objects.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
115 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
117 The Concepts of Bison
119 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
120 as mathematical ideas.
121 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
122 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
123 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
124 the name of an identifier, etc.).
125 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
126 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
127 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
128 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
129 how is the output used?
130 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
131 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
133 Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers
135 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers on unambiguous grammars.
136 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers to resolve ambiguities.
137 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
138 * Compiler Requirements:: @acronym{GLR} parsers require a modern C compiler.
142 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
143 a first example with no operator precedence.
144 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
145 Operator precedence is introduced.
146 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
147 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
148 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
149 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
150 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
152 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
154 * Decls: Rpcalc Decls. Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
155 * Rules: Rpcalc Rules. Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
156 * Lexer: Rpcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
157 * Main: Rpcalc Main. The controlling function.
158 * Error: Rpcalc Error. The error reporting function.
159 * Gen: Rpcalc Gen. Running Bison on the grammar file.
160 * Comp: Rpcalc Compile. Run the C compiler on the output code.
162 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
168 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
170 * Decls: Ltcalc Decls. Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
171 * Rules: Ltcalc Rules. Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
172 * Lexer: Ltcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
174 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
176 * Decl: Mfcalc Decl. Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
177 * Rules: Mfcalc Rules. Grammar rules for the calculator.
178 * Symtab: Mfcalc Symtab. Symbol table management subroutines.
182 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
183 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
184 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
185 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
186 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
187 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
188 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
189 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
191 Outline of a Bison Grammar
193 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
194 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
195 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
196 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
198 Defining Language Semantics
200 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
201 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
202 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
203 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
204 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
205 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
206 action in the middle of a rule.
210 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
211 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
212 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
216 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
217 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
218 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
219 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
220 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
221 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
222 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
223 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
224 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
225 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
226 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
228 Parser C-Language Interface
230 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
231 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
233 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
234 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
235 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
238 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
240 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
241 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
242 of the token it has read.
243 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
244 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
246 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
247 in a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
249 The Bison Parser Algorithm
251 * Look-Ahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
252 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
253 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
254 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
255 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
256 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
257 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
258 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
259 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
263 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
264 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
265 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
266 * How Precedence:: How they work.
268 Handling Context Dependencies
270 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
271 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
272 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
273 error recovery rules must be written.
275 Debugging Your Parser
277 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
278 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
282 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
283 in alphabetical order by short options.
284 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
285 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
287 C++ Language Interface
289 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
290 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
294 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
295 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
296 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
297 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
298 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
300 A Complete C++ Example
302 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
303 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
304 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
305 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
306 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
308 Frequently Asked Questions
310 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
311 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
312 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
313 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
314 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
315 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison @acronym{POSIX} safe?
316 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
317 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
318 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
319 * Other Languages:: Parsers in Java and others
320 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
321 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
325 * GNU Free Documentation License:: License for copying this manual.
331 @unnumbered Introduction
334 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts a grammar
335 description for an @acronym{LALR}(1) or @acronym{GLR} context-free grammar
336 into a C or C++ program to parse that grammar. Once you are proficient with
337 Bison, you can use it to develop a wide range of language parsers, from those
338 used in simple desk calculators to complex programming languages.
340 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc grammars
341 ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar with Yacc
342 should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need to be fluent in
343 C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to understand this manual.
345 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of using
346 Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the last. If you
347 don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these chapters. Reference
348 chapters follow which describe specific aspects of Bison in detail.
350 Bison was written primarily by Robert Corbett; Richard Stallman made it
351 Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University added
352 multi-character string literals and other features.
354 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
357 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
359 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
360 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
361 permissions applied only when Bison was generating @acronym{LALR}(1)
362 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
363 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
365 The other @acronym{GNU} programming tools, such as the @acronym{GNU} C
367 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
368 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
369 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
370 License to all of the Bison source code.
372 The output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser file---contains a
373 verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is the code for the
374 parser's implementation. (The actions from your grammar are inserted
375 into this implementation at one point, but most of the rest of the
376 implementation is not changed.) When we applied the @acronym{GPL}
377 terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
378 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
380 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
381 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
382 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
383 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
384 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
385 using the other @acronym{GNU} tools.
387 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
388 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
389 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
390 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
396 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
398 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
399 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
400 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
403 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
404 as mathematical ideas.
405 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
406 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
407 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
408 the name of an identifier, etc.).
409 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
410 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
411 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
412 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
413 how is the output used?
414 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
415 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
418 @node Language and Grammar
419 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
421 @cindex context-free grammar
422 @cindex grammar, context-free
423 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
424 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
425 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
426 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
427 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
428 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
429 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
430 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
433 @cindex @acronym{BNF}
434 @cindex Backus-Naur form
435 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
436 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``@acronym{BNF}'', which was developed in
437 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
438 @acronym{BNF} is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
439 essentially machine-readable @acronym{BNF}.
441 @cindex @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars
442 @cindex @acronym{LR}(1) grammars
443 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammar. Although it
444 can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
445 are called @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars.
446 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to
447 tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single
448 token of look-ahead. Strictly speaking, that is a description of an
449 @acronym{LR}(1) grammar, and @acronym{LALR}(1) involves additional
450 restrictions that are
451 hard to explain simply; but it is rare in actual practice to find an
452 @acronym{LR}(1) grammar that fails to be @acronym{LALR}(1).
453 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
454 more information on this.
456 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
457 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
458 @cindex ambiguous grammars
459 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
461 Parsers for @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
462 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
463 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
464 (called a @dfn{look-ahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
465 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
466 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
467 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
468 look-ahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
469 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
470 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as @acronym{GLR}
471 parsing (for Generalized @acronym{LR}). Bison's @acronym{GLR} parsers
472 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
473 possible parses of any given string is finite.
475 @cindex symbols (abstract)
477 @cindex syntactic grouping
478 @cindex grouping, syntactic
479 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
480 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
481 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
482 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
483 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
484 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
485 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
487 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
488 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
489 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
490 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
491 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
492 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
493 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
494 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
495 lexicography, not grammar.)
497 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
501 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
502 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
503 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
504 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
505 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
506 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
507 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
512 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
513 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
514 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
515 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
516 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
520 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
521 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
522 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
523 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
524 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
525 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
526 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
527 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
529 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
530 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
531 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
532 reads informally as follows:
535 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
540 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
544 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
545 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
546 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
547 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
550 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
551 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
552 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
553 not the start symbol.
555 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
556 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
557 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
558 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
559 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
560 reports a syntax error.
562 @node Grammar in Bison
563 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
564 @cindex Bison grammar
565 @cindex grammar, Bison
566 @cindex formal grammar
568 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
569 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
570 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
572 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
573 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
574 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
576 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
577 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
578 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
579 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
580 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
581 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
582 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
585 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
586 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
587 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
588 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
590 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
591 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
593 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
594 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
595 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
596 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
600 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
605 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
607 @node Semantic Values
608 @section Semantic Values
609 @cindex semantic value
610 @cindex value, semantic
612 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
613 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
614 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
615 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
616 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
619 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
620 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
621 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
622 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
623 ,Defining Language Semantics},
626 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
627 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
628 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
629 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
632 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
633 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
634 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
635 need to have any semantic value.)
637 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
638 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
639 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
640 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
641 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
642 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
644 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
645 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
646 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
647 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
648 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
650 @node Semantic Actions
651 @section Semantic Actions
652 @cindex semantic actions
653 @cindex actions, semantic
655 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
656 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
657 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
658 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
661 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
662 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
663 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
664 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
665 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
666 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
667 newly recognized larger expression.
669 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
673 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
678 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
679 from the values of the two subexpressions.
682 @section Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers
683 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
684 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
687 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
688 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
690 In some grammars, Bison's standard
691 @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
692 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
693 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
694 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
695 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
696 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
697 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
698 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
700 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be @acronym{LALR}(1), a
701 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
702 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
703 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized @acronym{LR}
704 (@acronym{GLR}) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
705 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
706 declarations) identically to @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers. However, when
707 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
708 @acronym{GLR} parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
709 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
710 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
711 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
712 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
713 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
714 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
715 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
716 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
717 identical set of symbols.
719 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
720 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
721 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
722 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
723 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
724 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
725 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
726 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
727 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
731 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers on unambiguous grammars.
732 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers to resolve ambiguities.
733 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
734 * Compiler Requirements:: @acronym{GLR} parsers require a modern C compiler.
737 @node Simple GLR Parsers
738 @subsection Using @acronym{GLR} on Unambiguous Grammars
739 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing, unambiguous grammars
740 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing, unambiguous grammars
744 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
745 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
747 In the simplest cases, you can use the @acronym{GLR} algorithm
748 to parse grammars that are unambiguous, but fail to be @acronym{LALR}(1).
749 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of look-ahead,
750 or (in rare cases) fall into the category of grammars in which the
751 @acronym{LALR}(1) algorithm throws away too much information (they are in
752 @acronym{LR}(1), but not @acronym{LALR}(1), @ref{Mystery Conflicts}).
754 Consider a problem that
755 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
756 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
759 type subrange = lo .. hi;
760 type enum = (a, b, c);
764 The original language standard allows only numeric
765 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
766 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (@acronym{ISO}/@acronym{IEC}
767 10206) and many other
768 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
769 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
773 type subrange = (a) .. b;
777 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
778 type with only one value:
785 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
786 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
788 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
789 With normal @acronym{LALR}(1) one-token look-ahead it is not
790 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
791 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
792 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
793 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
794 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
795 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
797 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
798 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
799 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
800 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
803 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
804 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
805 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
806 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
807 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
808 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
811 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
812 use the @acronym{GLR} algorithm.
813 When the @acronym{GLR} parser reaches the critical state, it
814 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
815 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
816 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
817 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
818 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
819 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
820 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
821 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
823 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
824 reports a syntax error as usual.
826 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
827 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
828 look-ahead than the underlying @acronym{LALR}(1) algorithm actually allows
829 for. In this example, @acronym{LALR}(2) would suffice, but also some cases
830 that are not @acronym{LALR}(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
832 In general, a @acronym{GLR} parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
833 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
834 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
835 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
836 The present example contains only one conflict between two
837 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
838 cannot be nested. So the number of
839 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
840 and the parsing time is still linear.
842 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
843 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
846 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
856 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
861 type : '(' id_list ')'
883 When used as a normal @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
884 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
885 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
886 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
893 The parser can be turned into a @acronym{GLR} parser, while also telling Bison
894 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by
895 adding these two declarations to the Bison input file (before the first
904 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
905 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
906 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
907 notice when the parser splits.
909 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of @acronym{GLR},
910 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
911 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
912 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that @acronym{GLR}
913 splitting is only done where it is intended. A @acronym{GLR} parser
914 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
915 @acronym{LALR} parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
916 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
917 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
918 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
919 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
920 eliminated by using @acronym{GLR} to shift the complications from the
921 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
924 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
925 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
926 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
927 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
928 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
929 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
931 @node Merging GLR Parses
932 @subsection Using @acronym{GLR} to Resolve Ambiguities
933 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing, ambiguous grammars
934 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing, ambiguous grammars
938 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
940 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
945 #define YYSTYPE char const *
947 void yyerror (char const *);
960 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
963 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
967 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
968 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
969 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
970 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
971 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
974 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
975 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
976 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
977 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
980 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
986 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
987 certain declarations and statements. For example,
994 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
995 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
996 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
997 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
998 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
999 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1000 @acronym{GLR} parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1001 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1002 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1003 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1004 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1005 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1006 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1007 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1009 At this point, the @acronym{GLR} parser requires a specification in the
1010 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1011 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1012 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1013 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1014 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1015 The parser therefore prints
1018 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1021 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1022 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1029 This is another example of using @acronym{GLR} to parse an unambiguous
1030 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1031 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1032 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1033 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1034 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1035 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1036 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1037 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1038 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1044 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1045 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1046 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1047 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1051 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1052 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1057 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1061 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1069 with an accompanying forward declaration
1070 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1074 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1075 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1080 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1081 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1084 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1087 Bison requires that all of the
1088 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1089 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1090 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1091 the offending merge.
1093 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1094 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1096 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1097 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1098 the associated reduction.
1099 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1100 action in a @acronym{GLR} parser.
1103 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yychar}
1105 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yylval}
1107 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yylloc}
1108 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1109 the look-ahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1110 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1111 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1112 look-ahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1113 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1114 influence syntax analysis.
1115 @xref{Look-Ahead, ,Look-Ahead Tokens}.
1118 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1119 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1120 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1121 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1122 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1123 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1124 future versions of Bison.
1125 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1126 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1127 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1130 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1131 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1132 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1133 initiate error recovery.
1134 During deterministic @acronym{GLR} operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1135 the same as its effect in an @acronym{LALR}(1) parser.
1136 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1137 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1139 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1140 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in @acronym{GLR} parsers.
1142 @node Compiler Requirements
1143 @subsection Considerations when Compiling @acronym{GLR} Parsers
1144 @cindex @code{inline}
1145 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{inline}
1147 The @acronym{GLR} parsers require a compiler for @acronym{ISO} C89 or
1148 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1149 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1150 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1151 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1152 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1161 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1165 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1171 @node Locations Overview
1174 @cindex textual location
1175 @cindex location, textual
1177 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1178 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1179 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1180 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1182 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1183 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1184 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1185 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1187 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1188 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1189 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1192 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1193 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1194 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1195 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1196 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1197 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1198 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1201 @section Bison Output: the Parser File
1202 @cindex Bison parser
1203 @cindex Bison utility
1204 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1207 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The output
1208 is a C source file that parses the language described by the grammar.
1209 This file is called a @dfn{Bison parser}. Keep in mind that the Bison
1210 utility and the Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility
1211 is a program whose output is the Bison parser that becomes part of your
1214 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1215 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1216 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1219 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1220 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1221 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1222 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1223 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1224 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1225 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1227 The Bison parser file is C code which defines a function named
1228 @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This function does not make
1229 a complete C program: you must supply some additional functions. One is
1230 the lexical analyzer. Another is an error-reporting function which the
1231 parser calls to report an error. In addition, a complete C program must
1232 start with a function called @code{main}; you have to provide this, and
1233 arrange for it to call @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run.
1234 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
1236 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1237 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser file itself
1238 begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface functions
1239 such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the error reporting
1240 function @code{yyerror} and the parser function @code{yyparse} itself.
1241 This also includes numerous identifiers used for internal purposes.
1242 Therefore, you should avoid using C identifiers starting with @samp{yy}
1243 or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar file except for the ones defined in
1244 this manual. Also, you should avoid using the C identifiers
1245 @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for anything other than their usual
1248 In some cases the Bison parser file includes system headers, and in
1249 those cases your code should respect the identifiers reserved by those
1250 headers. On some non-@acronym{GNU} hosts, @code{<alloca.h>}, @code{<malloc.h>},
1251 @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are included as needed to
1252 declare memory allocators and related types. @code{<libintl.h>} is
1253 included if message translation is in use
1254 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may
1255 be included if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value
1256 (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1259 @section Stages in Using Bison
1260 @cindex stages in using Bison
1263 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1264 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1268 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1269 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1270 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1271 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1272 sequence of C statements.
1275 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1276 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1277 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1278 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1281 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1284 Write error-reporting routines.
1287 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1288 must follow these steps:
1292 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1295 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1298 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1301 @node Grammar Layout
1302 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1303 @cindex grammar file
1305 @cindex format of grammar file
1306 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1308 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1309 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1316 @var{Bison declarations}
1325 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1326 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1328 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1329 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1330 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1331 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1332 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1333 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1335 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1336 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1337 semantic values of various symbols.
1339 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1342 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1343 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1344 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1348 @cindex simple examples
1349 @cindex examples, simple
1351 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1352 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1353 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1354 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1355 desk-top calculator.
1357 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1358 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1359 source file to try them.
1362 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1363 a first example with no operator precedence.
1364 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1365 Operator precedence is introduced.
1366 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1367 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1368 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1369 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1370 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1374 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1375 @cindex reverse polish notation
1376 @cindex polish notation calculator
1377 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1378 @cindex calculator, simple
1380 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1381 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1382 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1383 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1385 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1386 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison input files.
1389 * Decls: Rpcalc Decls. Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1390 * Rules: Rpcalc Rules. Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1391 * Lexer: Rpcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
1392 * Main: Rpcalc Main. The controlling function.
1393 * Error: Rpcalc Error. The error reporting function.
1394 * Gen: Rpcalc Gen. Running Bison on the grammar file.
1395 * Comp: Rpcalc Compile. Run the C compiler on the output code.
1399 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1401 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1402 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1405 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1408 #define YYSTYPE double
1411 void yyerror (char const *);
1416 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1419 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1420 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1422 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1423 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1424 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1425 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1426 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1427 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1428 which is a floating point number.
1430 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1431 function @code{pow}.
1433 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1434 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1435 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1436 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1439 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1440 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1441 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1442 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1443 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1444 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1445 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1446 type for numeric constants.
1449 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1451 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1459 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1462 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1463 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1464 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1465 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1466 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1467 /* Exponentiation */
1468 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1470 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1475 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1476 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1477 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1478 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1479 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1482 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1483 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1484 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1486 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1487 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1488 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1489 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1490 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1491 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1500 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1502 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1510 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1511 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1512 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1513 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1514 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1516 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1517 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1518 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1519 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1520 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1521 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1523 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1524 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1525 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1526 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1529 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1530 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1531 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1534 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1536 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1540 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1544 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1545 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1546 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1547 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1548 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1549 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1550 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1552 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1553 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1554 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1555 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1556 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1559 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1561 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1562 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1563 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1564 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1568 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1569 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1574 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1575 equally well have written them separately:
1579 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1580 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1584 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1585 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1586 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1587 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1588 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1589 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1590 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1591 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1593 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1594 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1595 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1597 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1598 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1602 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1606 means the same thing as this:
1610 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1616 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1619 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1620 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1621 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1623 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1624 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1625 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1626 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1628 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the @acronym{RPN}
1630 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1631 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1632 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1633 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1635 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1636 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1637 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1638 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1639 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1640 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1641 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1642 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1643 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1645 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1646 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1647 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1648 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Decls,
1649 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1651 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1652 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1654 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1658 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1659 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1660 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1661 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1672 /* Skip white space. */
1673 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1677 /* Process numbers. */
1678 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1681 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1686 /* Return end-of-input. */
1689 /* Return a single char. */
1696 @subsection The Controlling Function
1697 @cindex controlling function
1698 @cindex main function in simple example
1700 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1701 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1702 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1715 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1716 @cindex error reporting routine
1718 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1719 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1720 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1721 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1722 here is the definition we will use:
1728 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1730 yyerror (char const *s)
1732 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1737 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1738 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1739 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1740 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1741 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1742 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1745 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1746 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1748 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1749 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1750 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file. The
1751 definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} go at the
1752 end, in the epilogue of the file
1753 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1755 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1756 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1758 With all the source in a single file, you use the following command to
1759 convert it into a parser file:
1766 In this example the file was called @file{rpcalc.y} (for ``Reverse Polish
1767 @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c},
1768 removing the @samp{.y} from the original file name. The file output by
1769 Bison contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional
1770 functions in the input file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main})
1771 are copied verbatim to the output.
1773 @node Rpcalc Compile
1774 @subsection Compiling the Parser File
1775 @cindex compiling the parser
1777 Here is how to compile and run the parser file:
1781 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1783 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1787 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1788 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1789 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1793 # @r{List files again.}
1795 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1799 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1800 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1806 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1808 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1812 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1814 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1819 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1820 @cindex infix notation calculator
1822 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1824 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1825 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1826 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1827 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1830 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1833 #define YYSTYPE double
1837 void yyerror (char const *);
1840 /* Bison declarations. */
1844 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1845 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1847 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1853 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1856 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1857 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1858 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1859 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1860 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1861 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1862 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1863 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1869 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1872 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1874 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1875 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1876 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1877 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1878 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1879 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1882 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1883 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1884 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1885 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1886 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1889 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1890 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1891 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1892 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1893 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1895 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1900 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1908 @node Simple Error Recovery
1909 @section Simple Error Recovery
1910 @cindex error recovery, simple
1912 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1913 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1914 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1915 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1916 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1917 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1919 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1920 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1921 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1926 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1927 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1932 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1933 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1934 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1935 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1936 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1937 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1938 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1939 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1942 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1943 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1944 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1945 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1946 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1947 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1950 @node Location Tracking Calc
1951 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1952 @cindex location tracking calculator
1953 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1954 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1956 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1957 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
1958 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
1959 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
1963 * Decls: Ltcalc Decls. Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
1964 * Rules: Ltcalc Rules. Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
1965 * Lexer: Ltcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
1969 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
1971 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
1972 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
1975 /* Location tracking calculator. */
1981 void yyerror (char const *);
1984 /* Bison declarations. */
1992 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1996 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
1997 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
1998 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
1999 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2000 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2004 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2006 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2007 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2008 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2009 from the new information.
2011 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2012 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2023 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2028 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2029 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2030 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2031 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2041 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2042 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2043 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2048 | '-' exp %preg NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2049 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2050 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2054 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2055 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2056 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2058 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2059 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2060 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2061 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2062 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2063 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2067 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2069 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2070 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2071 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2074 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2075 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2086 /* Skip white space. */
2087 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2088 ++yylloc.last_column;
2093 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2094 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2098 /* Process numbers. */
2102 ++yylloc.last_column;
2103 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2105 ++yylloc.last_column;
2106 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2113 /* Return end-of-input. */
2117 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2121 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2124 ++yylloc.last_column;
2129 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2130 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2131 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2132 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2134 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2135 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2136 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2137 controlling function:
2144 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2145 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2151 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2152 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2153 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2155 @node Multi-function Calc
2156 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2157 @cindex multi-function calculator
2158 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2159 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2161 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2162 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2163 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2164 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2165 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2167 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2168 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2169 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2170 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2171 functions whose syntax has this form:
2174 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2178 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2179 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2180 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2184 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2188 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2194 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2199 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2202 * Decl: Mfcalc Decl. Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2203 * Rules: Mfcalc Rules. Grammar rules for the calculator.
2204 * Symtab: Mfcalc Symtab. Symbol table management subroutines.
2208 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2210 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2215 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2216 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2218 void yyerror (char const *);
2223 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2224 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2227 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2228 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2235 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2236 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2238 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2241 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2242 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2243 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2245 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2246 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2247 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2248 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2250 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2251 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2252 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2253 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2254 between angle brackets).
2256 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2257 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2258 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2259 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2260 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2261 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2264 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2266 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2267 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2268 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2280 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2281 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2286 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2287 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2288 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2289 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2290 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2291 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2292 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2293 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2294 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2295 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2296 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2299 /* End of grammar. */
2304 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2305 @cindex symbol table example
2307 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2308 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2309 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2310 requires some additional C functions for support.
2312 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2313 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2314 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2318 /* Function type. */
2319 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2323 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2326 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2327 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2330 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2331 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2333 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2338 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2340 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2341 extern symrec *sym_table;
2343 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2344 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2348 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2349 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2350 @code{init_table} as well:
2356 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2358 yyerror (char const *s)
2368 double (*fnct) (double);
2373 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2386 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2391 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2397 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2399 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2400 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2415 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2416 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2418 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2419 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2420 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2421 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2422 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2423 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2427 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2430 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2431 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2432 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2433 ptr->type = sym_type;
2434 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2435 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2441 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2444 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2445 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2446 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2452 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2453 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2454 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2455 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2457 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2458 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2459 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2460 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2461 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2462 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2464 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2465 operators in @code{yylex}.
2478 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2479 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2486 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2487 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2490 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2496 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2500 static char *symbuf = 0;
2501 static int length = 0;
2506 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2507 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2509 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2516 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2520 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2522 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2524 /* Get another character. */
2529 while (isalnum (c));
2536 s = getsym (symbuf);
2538 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2543 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2549 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2550 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2551 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2559 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2562 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2563 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2564 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2567 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2568 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2572 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2574 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2575 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2577 The Bison grammar input file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2578 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2581 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2582 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2583 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2584 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2585 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2586 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2587 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2588 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2591 @node Grammar Outline
2592 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2594 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2595 appropriate delimiters:
2602 @var{Bison declarations}
2611 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2612 As a @acronym{GNU} extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2613 continues until end of line.
2616 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2617 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2618 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2619 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2623 @subsection The prologue
2624 @cindex declarations section
2626 @cindex declarations
2628 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2629 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2630 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser file so that
2631 they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can use
2632 @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If you
2633 don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2634 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2636 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the the first occurrence
2637 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2640 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2641 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2642 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2643 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2644 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2645 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2646 @code{%union} declaration.
2656 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2660 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2661 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2667 @node Bison Declarations
2668 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
2669 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
2670 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
2672 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
2673 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
2674 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
2675 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
2678 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
2679 @cindex grammar rules section
2680 @cindex rules section for grammar
2682 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
2683 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
2685 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
2686 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
2687 if it is the first thing in the file.
2690 @subsection The epilogue
2691 @cindex additional C code section
2693 @cindex C code, section for additional
2695 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser file, just as
2696 the @var{Prologue} is copied to the beginning. This is the most convenient
2697 place to put anything that you want to have in the parser file but which need
2698 not come before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the
2699 definitions of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because
2700 C requires functions to be declared before being used, you often need
2701 to declare functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue,
2702 even if you define them in the Epilogue.
2703 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
2705 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
2706 from the grammar rules.
2708 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
2709 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
2710 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
2711 of the grammar file.
2714 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
2715 @cindex nonterminal symbol
2716 @cindex terminal symbol
2720 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
2723 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
2724 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
2725 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
2726 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
2727 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
2728 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
2729 the symbol to stand for it.
2731 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
2732 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
2733 By convention, it should be all lower case.
2735 Symbol names can contain letters, digits (not at the beginning),
2736 underscores and periods. Periods make sense only in nonterminals.
2738 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
2742 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
2743 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
2744 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
2745 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
2748 @cindex character token
2749 @cindex literal token
2750 @cindex single-character literal
2751 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
2752 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
2753 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
2754 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
2755 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
2756 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
2757 ,Operator Precedence}).
2759 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
2760 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
2761 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
2762 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
2763 your program will confuse other readers.
2765 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
2766 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
2767 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
2768 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
2769 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
2770 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
2774 @cindex string token
2775 @cindex literal string token
2776 @cindex multicharacter literal
2777 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
2778 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
2779 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
2780 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
2781 (@pxref{Precedence}).
2783 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
2784 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
2785 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
2786 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
2787 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
2789 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
2791 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
2792 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
2793 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
2794 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
2795 read your program will be confused.
2797 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
2798 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
2799 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
2800 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
2801 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
2802 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
2805 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
2806 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
2807 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
2809 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
2810 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
2811 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
2812 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
2813 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
2814 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
2815 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
2816 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
2817 Each named token type becomes a C macro in
2818 the parser file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code.
2819 (This is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.)
2820 @xref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
2822 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
2823 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
2824 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
2825 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
2826 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2828 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
2829 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
2830 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
2831 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
2832 characters in the following C-language string:
2835 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
2838 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
2839 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
2840 @acronym{ASCII} environment, but then compile and run the resulting
2841 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
2842 @acronym{EBCDIC}, the resulting program may not work because the tables
2843 generated by Bison will assume @acronym{ASCII} numeric values for
2844 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
2845 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
2846 @acronym{ASCII} environment, so installers on platforms that are
2847 incompatible with @acronym{ASCII} must rebuild those files before
2850 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
2851 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
2852 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
2853 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
2854 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
2857 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
2859 @cindex grammar rule syntax
2860 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
2862 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
2866 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
2872 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
2873 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
2874 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
2886 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
2887 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
2889 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
2890 extra white space as you wish.
2892 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
2893 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
2896 @{@var{C statements}@}
2901 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
2902 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
2903 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
2904 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
2905 copies the code to the output file, where the C compiler can check it.
2907 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
2908 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
2909 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
2910 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
2911 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
2912 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
2913 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
2914 character constants.
2916 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
2920 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
2921 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
2925 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
2926 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
2933 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
2935 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
2936 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
2937 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
2954 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
2958 @section Recursive Rules
2959 @cindex recursive rule
2961 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
2962 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
2963 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
2964 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
2965 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
2975 @cindex left recursion
2976 @cindex right recursion
2978 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
2979 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
2980 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
2991 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
2992 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
2993 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
2994 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
2995 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
2996 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
2997 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3000 @cindex mutual recursion
3001 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3002 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3003 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3011 | primary '+' primary
3023 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3027 @section Defining Language Semantics
3028 @cindex defining language semantics
3029 @cindex language semantics, defining
3031 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3032 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3033 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3035 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3036 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3037 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3038 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3041 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3042 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3043 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3044 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3045 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3046 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3047 action in the middle of a rule.
3051 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3052 @cindex semantic value type
3053 @cindex value type, semantic
3054 @cindex data types of semantic values
3055 @cindex default data type
3057 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3058 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3059 @acronym{RPN} and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3060 Notation Calculator}).
3062 Bison's default is to use type @code{int} for all semantic values. To
3063 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3066 #define YYSTYPE double
3070 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3071 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3072 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3073 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3075 @node Multiple Types
3076 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3078 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3079 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3080 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3081 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3084 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3085 requires you to do two things:
3089 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, with the
3090 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3094 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3095 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3096 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3097 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3098 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3107 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3108 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3109 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3110 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3112 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3113 placed at any position in the rule;
3114 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3115 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3116 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3117 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3119 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the components
3120 matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}}, which stands for
3121 the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic value for the grouping
3122 being constructed is @code{$$}. Bison translates both of these
3123 constructs into expressions of the appropriate type when it copies the
3124 actions into the parser file. @code{$$} is translated to a modifiable
3125 lvalue, so it can be assigned to.
3127 Here is a typical example:
3138 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3139 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3140 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3141 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3142 The sum is stored into @code{$$} so that it becomes the semantic value of
3143 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3144 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3145 referred to as @code{$2}.
3147 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3148 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3149 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3150 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3151 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3155 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3159 @cindex default action
3160 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3161 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3162 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3163 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3164 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3165 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3167 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3168 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3169 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3170 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3171 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3175 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3176 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3182 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3187 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3188 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3189 definition of @code{foo}.
3192 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the look-ahead token, if
3193 any, from a semantic action.
3194 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3195 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3198 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3199 @cindex action data types
3200 @cindex data types in actions
3202 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3203 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3205 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3206 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3207 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3208 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3209 in the rule. In this example,
3220 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3221 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3222 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3223 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3225 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3226 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3227 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3239 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3240 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3242 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3243 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3244 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3245 @cindex mid-rule actions
3247 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3248 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3249 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3251 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3252 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3253 it is run before they are parsed.
3255 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3256 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3257 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3258 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3261 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3262 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3263 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3264 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3265 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3266 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3268 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3269 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3270 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3271 at the end of the rule.
3273 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3274 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3275 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3276 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3277 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3278 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3282 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3283 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3284 declare_variable ($3); @}
3286 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3291 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3292 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3293 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3294 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3295 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3296 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3297 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3298 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3300 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3301 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3302 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3303 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3304 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3307 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3308 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3309 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3310 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3311 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3313 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3314 Discarded Symbols}).
3315 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor for a
3316 mid-rule action's semantic value.
3318 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3319 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3324 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3330 pop_context ($1); @}
3333 let: LET '(' var ')'
3334 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3335 declare_variable ($3); @}
3342 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3343 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3344 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3346 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3347 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3348 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3349 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3350 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3355 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3356 | '@{' statements '@}'
3362 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3366 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3367 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3370 | '@{' statements '@}'
3376 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3377 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3378 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3379 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3380 the @dfn{look-ahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3381 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Look-Ahead, ,Look-Ahead Tokens}.)
3383 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3384 actions into the two rules, like this:
3388 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3389 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3390 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3391 '@{' statements '@}'
3397 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3398 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3400 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3401 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3402 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3406 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3407 declarations statements '@}'
3408 | '@{' statements '@}'
3414 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3415 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3417 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3418 serves as a subroutine:
3422 subroutine: /* empty */
3423 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3429 compound: subroutine
3430 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3432 '@{' statements '@}'
3438 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3439 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3442 @section Tracking Locations
3444 @cindex textual location
3445 @cindex location, textual
3447 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3448 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3449 especially symbol locations.
3451 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3452 actions to take when rules are matched.
3455 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3456 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3457 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3461 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3462 @cindex data type of locations
3463 @cindex default location type
3465 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3466 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3468 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3469 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3470 defining @code{YYSTYPE} (@pxref{Value Type}).
3471 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3475 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3484 @node Actions and Locations
3485 @subsection Actions and Locations
3486 @cindex location actions
3487 @cindex actions, location
3491 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3492 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3494 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3495 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3496 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3497 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3498 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3501 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3508 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3509 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3510 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3511 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3518 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3519 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3520 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3526 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3527 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3528 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3531 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3532 example above simply rewrites this way:
3545 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3546 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3547 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3554 It is also possible to access the location of the look-ahead token, if any,
3555 from a semantic action.
3556 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
3557 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3559 @node Location Default Action
3560 @subsection Default Action for Locations
3561 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
3562 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
3564 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
3565 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
3566 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
3567 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
3568 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
3569 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
3570 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a @acronym{GLR}
3571 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
3574 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
3575 dedicated code from semantic actions.
3577 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
3578 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
3579 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
3580 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
3581 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
3582 When a @acronym{GLR} parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
3583 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
3584 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
3585 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
3586 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
3588 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
3592 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
3596 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
3597 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
3598 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
3599 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
3603 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
3604 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
3605 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
3606 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
3612 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
3613 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
3614 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
3616 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
3620 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
3621 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
3624 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
3625 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
3626 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
3627 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
3630 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
3631 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
3632 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
3633 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
3637 @section Bison Declarations
3638 @cindex declarations, Bison
3639 @cindex Bison declarations
3641 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
3642 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
3645 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
3646 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
3647 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
3648 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
3650 The first rule in the file also specifies the start symbol, by default.
3651 If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you must declare
3652 it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
3656 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
3657 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
3658 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
3659 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
3660 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
3661 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
3662 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
3663 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
3664 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
3665 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
3666 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
3670 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
3671 @cindex version requirement
3672 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
3675 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
3676 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
3680 %require "@var{version}"
3684 @subsection Token Type Names
3685 @cindex declaring token type names
3686 @cindex token type names, declaring
3687 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
3690 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
3696 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
3697 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
3698 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
3700 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
3701 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
3702 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
3705 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
3706 a decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
3707 following the token name:
3711 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
3715 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
3716 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
3717 with each other or with normal characters.
3719 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
3720 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
3721 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
3722 Than One Value Type}).
3728 %union @{ /* define stack type */
3732 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
3736 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
3737 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
3738 declaration which declares the name. For example:
3745 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
3746 equivalent literal string tokens:
3749 %token <operator> OR "||"
3750 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
3755 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
3756 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
3757 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
3758 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3760 @node Precedence Decl
3761 @subsection Operator Precedence
3762 @cindex precedence declarations
3763 @cindex declaring operator precedence
3764 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
3766 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
3767 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
3768 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
3769 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
3770 operator precedence.
3772 The syntax of a precedence declaration is the same as that of
3773 @code{%token}: either
3776 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
3783 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
3786 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
3787 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
3788 all the @var{symbols}:
3792 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
3793 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
3794 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
3795 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
3796 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
3797 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
3798 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
3799 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
3800 considered a syntax error.
3803 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
3804 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
3805 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
3806 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
3807 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
3811 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
3812 @cindex declaring value types
3813 @cindex value types, declaring
3816 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
3817 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
3818 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
3833 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
3834 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
3835 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
3836 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3838 As an extension to @acronym{POSIX}, a tag is allowed after the
3839 @code{union}. For example:
3851 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
3852 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
3855 As another extension to @acronym{POSIX}, you may specify multiple
3856 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
3857 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
3859 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
3860 a semicolon after the closing brace.
3863 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
3864 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
3865 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
3869 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
3870 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
3871 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
3874 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
3878 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
3879 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
3880 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
3881 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
3882 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
3885 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
3886 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
3887 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
3888 @code{<@var{type}>}.
3890 @node Initial Action Decl
3891 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
3892 @findex %initial-action
3894 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
3895 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
3898 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
3899 @findex %initial-action
3900 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
3901 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
3902 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the look-ahead --- and the
3903 @code{%parse-param}.
3906 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
3909 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
3912 @@$.initialize (file_name);
3917 @node Destructor Decl
3918 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
3919 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
3922 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
3923 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
3924 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
3925 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
3926 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
3927 must discard the start symbol.
3929 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
3930 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
3931 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
3932 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
3934 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
3935 symbol is automatically discarded.
3937 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
3939 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
3941 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
3942 with the discarded symbol. The additional parser parameters are also
3943 available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
3954 %token <string> STRING
3955 %type <string> string
3956 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} STRING string
3960 guarantees that when a @code{STRING} or a @code{string} is discarded,
3961 its associated memory will be freed.
3965 @cindex discarded symbols
3966 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
3970 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
3972 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
3974 the current look-ahead and the entire stack (except the current
3975 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
3977 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
3980 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
3981 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
3984 Right-hand size symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
3985 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
3986 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
3990 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
3991 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
3992 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
3993 @cindex warnings, preventing
3994 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
3998 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
3999 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4000 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4001 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4002 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4003 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4005 The declaration looks like this:
4011 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4012 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4013 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4014 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4016 For normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4017 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4018 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With @acronym{GLR}
4019 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4020 there would be no need to use @acronym{GLR} parsing. Therefore, it is
4021 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4022 in @acronym{GLR} parsers, using the declaration:
4028 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4032 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4033 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4034 print the number of conflicts.
4037 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4038 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4039 go back to the beginning.
4042 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4043 number which Bison printed. With @acronym{GLR} parsers, add an
4044 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4047 Now Bison will warn you if you introduce an unexpected conflict, but
4048 will keep silent otherwise.
4051 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4052 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4053 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4054 @cindex default start symbol
4057 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4058 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4059 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4066 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4067 @cindex reentrant parser
4069 @findex %pure-parser
4071 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4072 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4073 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4074 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4075 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4076 program must be called only within interlocks.
4078 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4079 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4080 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4081 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4082 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4084 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4085 declaration @code{%pure-parser} says that you want the parser to be
4086 reentrant. It looks like this:
4092 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4093 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4094 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4095 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4096 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs} also
4097 becomes local in @code{yyparse} (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4098 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4099 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4101 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4102 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4106 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4107 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4108 @cindex declaration summary
4109 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4111 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4113 @deffn {Directive} %union
4114 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4115 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4118 @deffn {Directive} %token
4119 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4120 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4123 @deffn {Directive} %right
4124 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4125 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4128 @deffn {Directive} %left
4129 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4130 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4133 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4134 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4135 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4136 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4140 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4141 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4142 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4146 @deffn {Directive} %type
4147 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4148 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4151 @deffn {Directive} %start
4152 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4156 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4157 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4158 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4164 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4167 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4168 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
4169 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
4171 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4173 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4174 Write a header file containing macro definitions for the token type
4175 names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4176 If the parser output file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then this file
4177 is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4179 Unless @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro, the output header
4180 declares @code{YYSTYPE}. Therefore, if you are using a @code{%union}
4181 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}) with components that
4182 require other definitions, or if you have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro
4183 (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to
4184 arrange for these definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by
4185 putting them in a prerequisite header that is included both by your
4186 parser and by any other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
4188 Unless your parser is pure, the output header declares @code{yylval}
4189 as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
4192 If you have also used locations, the output header declares
4193 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
4194 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations, ,Tracking
4197 This output file is normally essential if you wish to put the definition
4198 of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because @code{yylex}
4199 typically needs to be able to refer to the above-mentioned declarations
4200 and to the token type codes. @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of
4204 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
4205 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
4206 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
4209 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix="@var{prefix}"
4210 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names are
4211 chosen as if the input file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
4214 @deffn {Directive} %locations
4215 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
4216 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
4217 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
4218 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
4219 accurate syntax error messages.
4222 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix="@var{prefix}"
4223 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
4224 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
4226 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
4227 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
4228 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. For example, if you use
4229 @samp{%name-prefix="c_"}, the names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex},
4230 and so on. In C++ parsers, it is only the surrounding namespace which is
4231 named @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}.
4232 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
4236 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
4237 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
4238 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
4243 @deffn {Directive} %no-parser
4244 Do not include any C code in the parser file; generate tables only. The
4245 parser file contains just @code{#define} directives and static variable
4248 This option also tells Bison to write the C code for the grammar actions
4249 into a file named @file{@var{file}.act}, in the form of a
4250 brace-surrounded body fit for a @code{switch} statement.
4253 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
4254 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
4255 file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the parser file so that
4256 the C compiler and debuggers will associate errors and object code with
4257 your source file (the grammar file). This directive causes them to
4258 associate errors with the parser file, treating it an independent source
4259 file in its own right.
4262 @deffn {Directive} %output="@var{file}"
4263 Specify @var{file} for the parser file.
4266 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
4267 Request a pure (reentrant) parser program (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
4268 (Reentrant) Parser}).
4271 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
4272 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
4273 Require a Version of Bison}.
4276 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
4277 Generate an array of token names in the parser file. The name of the
4278 array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is the name of the
4279 token whose internal Bison token code number is @var{i}. The first
4280 three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the predefined tokens
4282 @code{"error"}, and @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols
4283 defined in the grammar file.
4285 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
4286 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
4287 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
4288 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
4289 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
4290 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
4291 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
4294 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
4295 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
4296 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
4300 The highest token number, plus one.
4302 The number of nonterminal symbols.
4304 The number of grammar rules,
4306 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
4310 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
4311 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
4312 parser states and what is done for each type of look-ahead token in
4313 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
4317 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
4318 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
4319 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
4323 @node Multiple Parsers
4324 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
4326 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
4327 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
4328 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
4329 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
4331 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
4332 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
4333 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
4334 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
4335 names that do not conflict.
4337 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
4338 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
4339 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. For example, if you use @samp{-p c},
4340 the names become @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, and so on.
4342 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
4343 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
4344 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
4345 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
4346 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
4348 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the beginning
4349 of the parser source file, defining @code{yyparse} as
4350 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes one
4351 name for the other in the entire parser file.
4354 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
4355 @cindex C-language interface
4358 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
4359 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
4360 functions that it needs to use.
4362 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
4363 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
4364 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
4365 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
4368 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
4369 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
4371 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
4372 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
4373 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
4377 @node Parser Function
4378 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
4381 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
4382 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
4383 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
4384 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
4385 without reading further.
4388 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
4389 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
4390 is due to end-of-input).
4392 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
4393 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
4396 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
4399 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
4404 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
4409 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
4412 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
4413 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
4414 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
4416 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
4417 @findex %parse-param
4418 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
4419 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
4420 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
4421 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
4422 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
4425 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
4428 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
4429 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
4433 Then call the parser like this:
4437 int nastiness, randomness;
4438 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
4439 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
4445 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
4448 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
4453 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
4455 @cindex lexical analyzer
4457 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
4458 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
4459 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
4460 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
4462 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the Bison
4463 grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source file, you
4464 need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be available there.
4465 To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run Bison, so that it will
4466 write these macro definitions into a separate header file
4467 @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include in the other source files
4468 that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
4471 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
4472 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
4473 of the token it has read.
4474 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
4475 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
4477 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
4478 in a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
4481 @node Calling Convention
4482 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
4484 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
4485 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
4486 signifies end-of-input.
4488 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
4489 in the parser file becomes a C macro whose definition is the proper
4490 numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can use the name
4491 to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
4493 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
4494 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
4495 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
4496 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
4497 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
4498 signifies end-of-input.
4500 Here is an example showing these things:
4507 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
4510 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
4511 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
4513 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
4519 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
4520 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
4522 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
4523 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
4527 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
4528 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
4529 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
4530 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
4533 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
4534 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
4535 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
4536 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
4537 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
4540 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
4541 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
4542 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
4543 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
4546 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
4549 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
4550 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
4551 strlen (token_buffer))
4552 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
4553 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
4558 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
4559 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
4563 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
4566 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
4567 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
4568 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
4569 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
4575 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
4576 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
4581 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
4582 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
4583 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
4584 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
4585 declaration looks like this:
4598 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
4603 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
4604 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
4609 @node Token Locations
4610 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
4613 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
4614 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the textual locations
4615 of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in
4616 @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual
4617 location of a token just parsed in the global variable @code{yylloc}.
4618 So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that variable.
4620 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
4621 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
4622 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
4623 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
4624 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
4627 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
4630 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
4632 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%pure-parser} to request a
4633 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
4634 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
4635 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
4636 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
4637 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
4642 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
4645 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
4646 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
4651 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
4652 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
4653 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
4657 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
4658 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
4661 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
4663 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
4664 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
4670 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
4671 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
4672 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
4676 results in the following signature:
4679 int yylex (int *nastiness);
4680 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
4683 If @code{%pure-parser} is added:
4686 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
4687 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
4691 and finally, if both @code{%pure-parser} and @code{%locations} are used:
4694 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
4695 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
4698 @node Error Reporting
4699 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
4700 @cindex error reporting function
4703 @cindex syntax error
4705 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
4706 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
4707 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
4708 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
4711 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
4712 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
4713 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
4714 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
4715 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
4717 @findex %error-verbose
4718 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison
4719 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
4720 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
4721 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
4723 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
4724 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
4725 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
4726 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
4727 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
4728 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
4730 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
4731 translated automatically from English to some other language before
4732 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
4734 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
4739 yyerror (char const *s)
4743 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
4748 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
4749 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
4750 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
4751 immediately return 1.
4753 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
4754 an access to the current location.
4755 This is indeed the case for the @acronym{GLR}
4756 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
4757 @samp{%locations %pure-parser} is passed then the prototypes for
4761 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
4762 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
4765 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
4768 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
4769 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
4772 Finally, @acronym{GLR} and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
4773 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
4774 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
4775 @code{%pure-parser} are pure. I.e.:
4778 /* Location tracking. */
4782 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
4784 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
4785 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
4789 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
4792 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
4793 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
4794 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
4795 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
4800 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
4801 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
4802 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
4803 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
4804 message is always passed last.
4806 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
4807 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
4808 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
4812 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
4813 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
4814 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
4815 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
4817 @node Action Features
4818 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
4819 @cindex summary, action features
4820 @cindex action features summary
4822 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
4823 are useful in actions.
4825 @deffn {Variable} $$
4826 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
4827 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
4830 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
4831 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
4832 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
4835 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
4836 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
4837 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
4838 Types of Values in Actions}.
4841 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
4842 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
4843 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
4844 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
4847 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
4848 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
4849 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
4852 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
4853 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
4854 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
4857 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
4859 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
4860 a single value, and only when there is no look-ahead token.
4861 It is also disallowed in @acronym{GLR} parsers.
4862 It installs a look-ahead token with token type @var{token} and
4863 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
4864 going to be reduced by this rule.
4866 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
4867 a look-ahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
4868 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
4871 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
4874 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
4876 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no look-ahead token.
4879 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
4881 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the look-ahead is the end of the input
4885 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
4887 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
4888 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
4889 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
4890 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
4891 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
4894 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
4895 This macro stands for an expression that has the value 1 when the parser
4896 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 the rest of the time.
4897 @xref{Error Recovery}.
4900 @deffn {Variable} yychar
4901 Variable containing either the look-ahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
4902 look-ahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no look-ahead
4903 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
4904 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
4906 @xref{Look-Ahead, ,Look-Ahead Tokens}.
4909 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
4910 Discard the current look-ahead token. This is useful primarily in
4912 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
4914 @xref{Error Recovery}.
4917 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
4918 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
4919 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
4920 @xref{Error Recovery}.
4923 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
4924 Variable containing the look-ahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
4925 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
4926 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
4928 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
4931 @deffn {Variable} yylval
4932 Variable containing the look-ahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
4933 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
4934 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
4936 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
4941 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
4942 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
4943 Tracking Locations}.
4945 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
4949 @c int first_line, last_line;
4950 @c int first_column, last_column;
4954 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
4955 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
4957 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
4958 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
4959 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
4962 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
4965 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
4967 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
4968 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
4969 Tracking Locations}.
4972 @node Internationalization
4973 @section Parser Internationalization
4974 @cindex internationalization
4980 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
4981 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
4982 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
4983 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
4984 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
4985 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
4986 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the @acronym{UTF}-8
4987 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
4990 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
4991 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
4992 steps. Here we assume a package that uses @acronym{GNU} Autoconf and
4993 @acronym{GNU} Automake.
4997 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
4998 Into the directory containing the @acronym{GNU} Autoconf macros used
4999 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
5000 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
5001 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
5005 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
5010 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
5011 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
5012 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
5013 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
5014 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
5015 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
5016 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
5017 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
5018 Bison-generated parser.
5021 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
5022 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
5023 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
5027 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
5030 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
5031 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
5032 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
5036 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
5037 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
5038 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
5041 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
5047 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
5051 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
5057 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
5058 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
5059 @cindex algorithm of parser
5062 @cindex parser stack
5063 @cindex stack, parser
5065 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
5066 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
5067 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
5069 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
5070 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
5073 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
5074 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
5075 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
5076 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
5077 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
5078 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
5079 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
5081 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
5088 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
5089 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
5092 expr: expr '*' expr;
5096 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
5103 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
5104 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
5106 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
5107 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
5108 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
5110 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
5113 * Look-Ahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
5114 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
5115 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
5116 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
5117 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
5118 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
5119 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
5120 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
5121 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
5125 @section Look-Ahead Tokens
5126 @cindex look-ahead token
5128 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
5129 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
5130 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
5131 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
5132 token in order to decide what to do.
5134 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
5135 @dfn{look-ahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
5136 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
5137 the look-ahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
5138 should take place, the look-ahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
5139 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
5140 token type of the look-ahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
5143 Here is a simple case where look-ahead is needed. These three rules define
5144 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
5145 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
5162 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
5163 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
5164 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
5165 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
5166 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
5168 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
5169 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
5170 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
5171 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
5172 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
5173 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
5178 The look-ahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
5179 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
5180 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
5181 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
5184 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
5186 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
5187 @cindex dangling @code{else}
5188 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
5190 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
5191 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
5197 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
5203 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
5204 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
5206 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the look-ahead token, the
5207 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
5208 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
5209 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
5212 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
5213 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
5214 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
5215 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
5216 contrast it with the other alternative.
5218 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
5219 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
5223 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
5225 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
5228 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
5229 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
5230 making these two inputs equivalent:
5233 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
5235 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
5238 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
5239 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
5240 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
5241 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
5242 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
5243 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
5244 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
5245 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
5247 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
5248 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration. There will be no
5249 warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts is exactly @var{n}.
5250 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
5252 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
5253 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
5254 rules. Here is a complete Bison input file that actually manifests the
5259 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
5271 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
5280 @section Operator Precedence
5281 @cindex operator precedence
5282 @cindex precedence of operators
5284 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
5285 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
5286 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
5287 shift and when to reduce.
5290 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
5291 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
5292 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
5293 * How Precedence:: How they work.
5296 @node Why Precedence
5297 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
5299 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
5300 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
5314 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
5315 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
5316 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
5317 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
5318 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
5319 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
5320 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
5323 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
5324 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
5325 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
5326 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
5327 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
5328 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
5329 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
5330 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
5333 @cindex associativity
5334 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
5335 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
5336 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
5337 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
5338 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
5339 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
5340 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the look-ahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
5341 makes right-associativity.
5343 @node Using Precedence
5344 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
5349 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
5350 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
5351 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
5352 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
5353 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
5354 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
5355 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
5358 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
5359 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
5360 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
5361 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
5362 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
5364 @node Precedence Examples
5365 @subsection Precedence Examples
5367 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
5375 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
5376 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
5377 declared with @code{'-'}:
5380 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
5386 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
5387 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
5388 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
5390 @node How Precedence
5391 @subsection How Precedence Works
5393 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
5394 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
5395 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
5396 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
5397 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
5398 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
5400 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
5401 of the rule being considered with that of the look-ahead token. If the
5402 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
5403 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
5404 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
5405 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
5406 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
5409 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
5410 the look-ahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
5412 @node Contextual Precedence
5413 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
5414 @cindex context-dependent precedence
5415 @cindex unary operator precedence
5416 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
5417 @cindex precedence, unary operator
5420 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
5421 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
5422 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
5423 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
5425 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
5426 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
5427 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
5428 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
5431 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
5432 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
5433 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
5434 modifier's syntax is:
5437 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
5441 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
5442 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
5443 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
5444 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
5445 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
5447 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
5448 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
5449 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
5459 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
5466 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
5471 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
5472 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
5473 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
5474 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
5476 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
5477 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
5478 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
5479 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
5481 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
5482 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
5483 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
5484 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
5485 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
5486 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
5488 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
5489 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
5493 @section Parser States
5494 @cindex finite-state machine
5495 @cindex parser state
5496 @cindex state (of parser)
5498 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
5499 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
5500 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
5501 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
5502 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
5504 Each time a look-ahead token is read, the current parser state together
5505 with the type of look-ahead token are looked up in a table. This table
5506 entry can say, ``Shift the look-ahead token.'' In this case, it also
5507 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
5508 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
5509 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
5510 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
5511 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
5514 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the look-ahead token
5515 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
5516 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
5519 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
5520 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
5521 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
5523 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
5524 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
5527 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
5528 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
5531 sequence: /* empty */
5532 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
5535 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
5538 maybeword: /* empty */
5539 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
5541 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
5546 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
5547 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
5548 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
5549 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
5550 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
5551 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
5553 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
5554 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
5555 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
5557 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
5558 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
5559 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
5560 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
5561 In this example, the output of the program changes.
5563 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
5564 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
5565 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
5566 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
5569 sequence: /* empty */
5570 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
5572 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
5576 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
5579 sequence: /* empty */
5581 | sequence redirects
5588 redirects:/* empty */
5589 | redirects redirect
5594 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
5595 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
5596 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
5597 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
5598 in infinitely many ways!
5600 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
5601 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
5602 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
5603 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
5605 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
5609 sequence: /* empty */
5615 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
5619 sequence: /* empty */
5621 | sequence redirects
5629 | redirects redirect
5633 @node Mystery Conflicts
5634 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
5636 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
5644 def: param_spec return_spec ','
5648 | name_list ':' type
5666 | name ',' name_list
5671 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
5672 of look-ahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
5673 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
5674 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is @acronym{LR}(1).
5676 @cindex @acronym{LR}(1)
5677 @cindex @acronym{LALR}(1)
5678 However, Bison, like most parser generators, cannot actually handle all
5679 @acronym{LR}(1) grammars. In this grammar, two contexts, that after
5681 at the beginning of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of
5682 a @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
5683 same. They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
5684 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
5685 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
5686 that the rules would require different look-ahead tokens in the two
5687 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
5688 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
5689 occurrence means that the grammar is not @acronym{LALR}(1).
5691 In general, it is better to fix deficiencies than to document them. But
5692 this particular deficiency is intrinsically hard to fix; parser
5693 generators that can handle @acronym{LR}(1) grammars are hard to write
5695 produce parsers that are very large. In practice, Bison is more useful
5698 When the problem arises, you can often fix it by identifying the two
5699 parser states that are being confused, and adding something to make them
5700 look distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
5701 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
5712 /* This rule is never used. */
5718 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
5719 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
5720 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
5721 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
5722 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
5723 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
5725 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
5726 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
5727 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
5728 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
5729 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
5730 rather than the one for @code{name}.
5735 | name_list ':' type
5743 For a more detailed exposition of @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers and parser
5744 generators, please see:
5745 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of
5746 @acronym{LALR}(1) Look-Ahead Sets, @cite{@acronym{ACM} Transactions on
5747 Programming Languages and Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982),
5748 pp.@: 615--649 @uref{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/69622.357187}.
5750 @node Generalized LR Parsing
5751 @section Generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) Parsing
5752 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
5753 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
5754 @cindex ambiguous grammars
5755 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
5757 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
5758 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
5759 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of look-ahead.
5760 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
5761 context-free languages.
5762 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
5763 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
5764 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
5765 look-ahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
5766 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
5767 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
5768 there are languages where Bison's particular choice of how to
5769 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
5771 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
5772 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
5773 Generalized @acronym{LR} (or @acronym{GLR}). A Bison @acronym{GLR}
5774 parser uses the same basic
5775 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
5776 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
5777 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
5778 reduce-reduce conflict. When a @acronym{GLR} parser encounters such a
5780 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
5781 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
5782 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
5783 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
5784 a Bison @acronym{GLR} parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
5786 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
5787 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
5788 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
5789 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
5790 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
5791 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
5792 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
5793 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
5794 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
5795 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
5796 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
5799 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
5800 states to having one, it reverts to the normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing
5801 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
5802 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
5803 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
5804 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
5805 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
5806 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
5807 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
5808 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
5809 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
5810 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
5812 It is possible to use a data structure for the @acronym{GLR} parsing tree that
5813 permits the processing of any @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar in linear time (in the
5814 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
5815 @acronym{LALR}(1)) grammar in
5816 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
5817 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
5818 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
5819 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
5820 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
5821 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
5822 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
5823 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
5824 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
5825 structure should generally be adequate. On @acronym{LALR}(1) portions of a
5826 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the default
5829 For a more detailed exposition of @acronym{GLR} parsers, please see: Elizabeth
5830 Scott, Adrian Johnstone and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain, Tomita-Style
5831 Generalised @acronym{LR} Parsers, Royal Holloway, University of
5832 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12,
5833 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps},
5836 @node Memory Management
5837 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
5838 @cindex memory exhaustion
5839 @cindex memory management
5840 @cindex stack overflow
5841 @cindex parser stack overflow
5842 @cindex overflow of parser stack
5844 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
5845 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
5846 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
5848 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
5849 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
5850 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
5853 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
5854 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
5855 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
5856 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
5858 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
5859 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
5860 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
5861 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
5862 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
5863 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
5865 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
5866 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
5867 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
5870 @cindex default stack limit
5871 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
5875 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
5876 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the C
5877 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser, this value must be a compile-time constant
5878 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
5879 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
5881 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
5883 @c FIXME: C++ output.
5884 Because of semantical differences between C and C++, the
5885 @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
5886 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
5887 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
5888 this deficiency in a future release.
5890 @node Error Recovery
5891 @chapter Error Recovery
5892 @cindex error recovery
5893 @cindex recovery from errors
5895 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
5896 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
5897 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
5900 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
5901 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
5902 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
5903 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
5904 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
5905 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
5906 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
5909 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
5910 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
5911 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
5912 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
5913 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
5914 in the current context, the parse can continue.
5919 stmnts: /* empty string */
5925 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
5926 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
5928 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
5929 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
5930 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
5931 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
5932 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
5933 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
5934 applicable in the ordinary way.
5936 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
5937 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
5938 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
5939 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
5940 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
5941 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
5942 look-ahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
5943 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
5944 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
5945 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
5946 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
5947 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
5949 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
5950 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
5951 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
5954 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
5957 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
5958 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
5959 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
5960 spurious error message:
5963 primary: '(' expr ')'
5969 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
5970 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
5971 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
5972 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
5973 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
5974 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
5975 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
5978 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
5979 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
5980 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
5981 error messages resume.
5983 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
5984 as any other rules can.
5987 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
5988 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
5989 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
5990 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
5993 The previous look-ahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
5994 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
5995 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
5997 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
5999 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
6000 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
6001 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
6002 probably correct. The previous look-ahead token ought to be discarded
6003 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
6005 @vindex YYRECOVERING
6006 The macro @code{YYRECOVERING} stands for an expression that has the
6007 value 1 when the parser is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 the
6008 rest of the time. A value of 1 indicates that error messages are
6009 currently suppressed for new syntax errors.
6011 @node Context Dependency
6012 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
6014 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
6015 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
6016 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
6017 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
6021 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
6022 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
6023 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
6024 error recovery rules must be written.
6027 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
6028 neither clean nor robust.)
6030 @node Semantic Tokens
6031 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
6033 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
6034 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
6040 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
6041 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
6042 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
6044 The method used in @acronym{GNU} C is to have two different token types,
6045 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
6046 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
6047 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
6048 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
6050 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
6051 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
6052 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
6053 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
6054 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
6055 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
6056 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
6058 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
6059 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
6060 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
6061 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
6065 typedef int foo, bar;
6068 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
6069 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
6074 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
6075 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
6077 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
6078 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
6079 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
6080 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
6081 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
6085 declarator maybeasm '='
6087 | declarator maybeasm
6091 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
6093 | notype_declarator maybeasm
6098 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
6099 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
6100 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
6102 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
6103 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
6104 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
6105 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
6106 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
6107 the syntactic context.
6109 @node Lexical Tie-ins
6110 @section Lexical Tie-ins
6111 @cindex lexical tie-in
6113 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
6114 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
6117 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
6118 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
6119 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
6120 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
6121 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
6128 void yyerror (char const *);
6142 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
6156 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
6157 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
6158 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
6160 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the parser file
6161 is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue, ,The Prologue}).
6162 You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey the flag.
6164 @node Tie-in Recovery
6165 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
6167 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
6168 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6170 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
6171 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
6172 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
6173 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
6177 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
6184 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
6185 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
6186 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
6187 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
6188 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
6190 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
6192 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
6193 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
6194 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
6206 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
6207 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
6208 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
6209 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
6211 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
6212 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
6213 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
6214 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
6215 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
6216 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
6219 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
6222 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
6224 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
6225 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
6226 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
6227 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
6228 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
6229 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
6232 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
6233 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
6237 @section Understanding Your Parser
6239 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
6240 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
6241 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
6242 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
6243 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a @acronym{VCG}
6246 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
6247 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
6248 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
6249 the parser output file name, and adding @samp{.output} instead.
6250 Therefore, if the input file is @file{foo.y}, then the parser file is
6251 called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As a consequence, the verbose
6252 output file is called @file{foo.output}.
6254 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
6271 @command{bison} reports:
6274 calc.y: warning: 1 useless nonterminal and 1 useless rule
6275 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: useless nonterminal: useless
6276 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: useless rule: useless: STR
6277 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
6280 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
6281 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
6282 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
6283 interpretation is the same.
6285 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
6286 to precedence and/or associativity:
6289 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
6290 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
6291 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
6296 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
6299 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
6300 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
6301 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
6302 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
6306 @cindex token, useless
6307 @cindex useless token
6308 @cindex nonterminal, useless
6309 @cindex useless nonterminal
6310 @cindex rule, useless
6311 @cindex useless rule
6312 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
6313 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
6314 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
6315 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``not used''
6319 Useless nonterminals:
6322 Terminals which are not used:
6330 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
6336 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
6337 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
6338 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
6339 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
6340 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
6345 and reports the uses of the symbols:
6348 Terminals, with rules where they appear
6358 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
6363 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
6368 @cindex pointed rule
6369 @cindex rule, pointed
6370 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
6371 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
6372 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
6373 that the input cursor.
6378 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
6380 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6385 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
6386 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
6387 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
6388 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
6389 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
6390 symbol, and the look-ahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
6391 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
6392 look-ahead triggers a syntax error.''
6394 @cindex core, item set
6395 @cindex item set core
6396 @cindex kernel, item set
6397 @cindex item set core
6398 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
6399 report lists @code{NUM} as a look-ahead token because @code{NUM} can be
6400 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
6401 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
6402 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
6403 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
6409 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
6410 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
6411 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
6412 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
6413 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
6414 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
6416 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6427 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
6429 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
6433 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the look-ahead token
6434 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
6435 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
6436 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
6441 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
6442 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
6443 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6444 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6445 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6447 $ shift, and go to state 3
6448 '+' shift, and go to state 4
6449 '-' shift, and go to state 5
6450 '*' shift, and go to state 6
6451 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6455 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
6456 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the look-ahead if
6457 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
6458 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
6459 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
6460 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
6462 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
6468 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
6474 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
6475 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
6477 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
6483 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
6485 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6491 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
6493 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6499 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
6501 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6507 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
6509 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6514 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
6520 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
6521 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
6522 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6523 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6524 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6526 '*' shift, and go to state 6
6527 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6529 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
6530 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
6533 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the look-ahead @samp{/}:
6534 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
6535 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
6536 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
6537 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
6538 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
6539 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
6540 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
6542 Because in @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
6543 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
6544 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
6547 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
6548 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
6549 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
6550 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
6551 possible, the look-ahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
6552 one such state: if the look-ahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
6553 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
6554 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
6555 look-ahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
6556 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
6557 with some set of possible look-ahead tokens. When run with
6558 @option{--report=look-ahead}, Bison specifies these look-ahead tokens:
6563 exp -> exp . '+' exp [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
6564 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
6565 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6566 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6567 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6569 '*' shift, and go to state 6
6570 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6572 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
6573 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
6576 The remaining states are similar:
6581 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
6582 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6583 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
6584 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6585 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6587 '*' shift, and go to state 6
6588 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6590 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
6591 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
6595 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
6596 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6597 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6598 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
6599 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6601 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6603 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
6604 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
6608 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
6609 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
6610 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
6611 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
6612 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
6614 '+' shift, and go to state 4
6615 '-' shift, and go to state 5
6616 '*' shift, and go to state 6
6617 '/' shift, and go to state 7
6619 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
6620 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
6621 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
6622 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
6623 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
6627 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
6628 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
6629 @samp{*}, but also because the
6630 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
6634 @section Tracing Your Parser
6637 @cindex tracing the parser
6639 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
6640 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
6642 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
6645 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
6647 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
6648 parser. This is compliant with @acronym{POSIX} Yacc. You could use
6649 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
6650 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
6653 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
6654 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
6655 ,Invoking Bison}). This is @acronym{POSIX} compliant too.
6657 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
6659 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
6660 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
6661 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
6662 preprocessor. Unless @acronym{POSIX} and Yacc portability matter to
6664 the preferred solution.
6667 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
6670 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
6671 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
6672 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and
6673 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
6674 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
6675 and @code{YYPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
6677 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
6678 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
6679 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
6680 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
6682 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
6683 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
6684 messages tell you these things:
6688 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
6691 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
6692 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
6695 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
6696 of the state stack afterward.
6699 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
6700 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6701 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
6702 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
6703 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
6704 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
6705 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
6706 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
6707 grammar are to blame.
6709 The parser file is a C program and you can use C debuggers on it, but it's
6710 not easy to interpret what it is doing. The parser function is a
6711 finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from the actions it executes
6712 the same code over and over. Only the values of variables show where in
6713 the grammar it is working.
6716 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
6717 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
6718 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
6719 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
6720 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
6721 value (from @code{yylval}).
6723 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
6724 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Decl, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
6728 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
6729 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
6732 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
6735 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
6738 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
6739 else if (type == NUM)
6740 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
6744 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
6747 @chapter Invoking Bison
6748 @cindex invoking Bison
6749 @cindex Bison invocation
6750 @cindex options for invoking Bison
6752 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
6758 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
6759 @samp{.y}. The parser file's name is made by replacing the @samp{.y}
6760 with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory. Thus, the
6761 @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields
6762 @file{foo.tab.c}, and the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields
6763 @file{foo.tab.c}. It's also possible, in case you are writing
6764 C++ code instead of C in your grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp}
6765 or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the output files will take an extension like
6766 the given one as input (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and
6767 @file{foo.tab.c++}).
6768 This feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
6769 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
6774 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
6777 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
6780 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
6783 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
6785 For compatibility with @acronym{POSIX}, the standard Bison
6786 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
6787 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
6790 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
6791 in alphabetical order by short options.
6792 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
6793 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
6797 @section Bison Options
6799 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
6800 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
6801 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
6802 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
6803 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
6806 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
6807 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
6810 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
6816 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
6820 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
6822 @item --print-localedir
6823 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
6827 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause
6828 different diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in
6829 other minor ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output
6830 file name conventions, so that the parser output file is called
6831 @file{y.tab.c}, and the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and
6832 @file{y.tab.h}. Thus, the following shell script can substitute
6833 for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script for
6834 compatibility with @acronym{POSIX}:
6841 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
6842 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
6843 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
6844 this option is specified.
6853 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
6854 Specify the skeleton to use. You probably don't need this option unless
6855 you are developing Bison.
6859 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
6860 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
6861 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
6864 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6866 @item -p @var{prefix}
6867 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
6868 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix="@var{prefix}"} was specified.
6869 @xref{Decl Summary}.
6873 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser file.
6874 Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser file so that the C compiler
6875 and debuggers will associate errors with your source file, the
6876 grammar file. This option causes them to associate errors with the
6877 parser file, treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
6881 Pretend that @code{%no-parser} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6884 @itemx --token-table
6885 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6894 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
6895 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
6896 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6898 @item --defines=@var{defines-file}
6899 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
6901 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
6902 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
6903 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e, specify prefix to use
6904 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6906 @item -r @var{things}
6907 @itemx --report=@var{things}
6908 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
6909 separated list of @var{things} among:
6913 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
6914 @acronym{LALR} automaton.
6917 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
6918 each rule's look-ahead set.
6921 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
6922 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
6927 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e, write an extra output
6928 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
6929 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6932 @itemx --output=@var{file}
6933 Specify the @var{file} for the parser file.
6935 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
6936 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
6939 Output a @acronym{VCG} definition of the @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar
6940 automaton computed by Bison. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
6941 @acronym{VCG} output file will
6944 @item --graph=@var{graph-file}
6945 The behavior of @var{--graph} is the same than @samp{-g}. The only
6946 difference is that it has an optional argument which is the name of
6947 the output graph file.
6950 @node Option Cross Key
6951 @section Option Cross Key
6953 @c FIXME: How about putting the directives too?
6954 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
6955 the corresponding short option.
6957 @multitable {@option{--defines=@var{defines-file}}} {@option{-b @var{file-prefix}XXX}}
6958 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option
6959 @item @option{--debug} @tab @option{-t}
6960 @item @option{--defines=@var{defines-file}} @tab @option{-d}
6961 @item @option{--file-prefix=@var{prefix}} @tab @option{-b @var{file-prefix}}
6962 @item @option{--graph=@var{graph-file}} @tab @option{-d}
6963 @item @option{--help} @tab @option{-h}
6964 @item @option{--name-prefix=@var{prefix}} @tab @option{-p @var{name-prefix}}
6965 @item @option{--no-lines} @tab @option{-l}
6966 @item @option{--no-parser} @tab @option{-n}
6967 @item @option{--output=@var{outfile}} @tab @option{-o @var{outfile}}
6968 @item @option{--print-localedir} @tab
6969 @item @option{--token-table} @tab @option{-k}
6970 @item @option{--verbose} @tab @option{-v}
6971 @item @option{--version} @tab @option{-V}
6972 @item @option{--yacc} @tab @option{-y}
6976 @section Yacc Library
6978 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
6979 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
6980 implementations are normally not useful, but @acronym{POSIX} requires
6981 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
6982 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
6983 library is distributed under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} General
6984 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
6986 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
6987 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
6990 int yyerror (char const *);
6993 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
6994 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
6995 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
7001 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
7003 @node C++ Language Interface
7004 @chapter C++ Language Interface
7007 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
7008 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
7012 @section C++ Parsers
7015 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
7016 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
7017 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
7018 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
7019 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
7022 @node C++ Bison Interface
7023 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
7024 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
7028 The C++ parser @acronym{LALR}(1) skeleton is named @file{lalr1.cc}. To
7029 select it, you may either pass the option @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}
7030 to Bison, or include the directive @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"} in the
7031 grammar preamble. When run, @command{bison} will create several
7032 entities in the @samp{yy} namespace. Use the @samp{%name-prefix}
7033 directive to change the namespace name, see @ref{Decl Summary}. The
7034 various classes are generated in the following files:
7039 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
7040 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
7043 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
7046 @itemx @var{file}.cc
7047 (Assuming the extension of the input file was @samp{.yy}.) The
7048 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
7049 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
7050 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
7052 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
7053 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
7054 @samp{%defines} directive.
7057 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
7058 for a complete and accurate documentation.
7060 @node C++ Semantic Values
7061 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
7062 @c - No objects in unions
7064 @c - Printer and destructor
7066 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
7067 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
7068 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
7069 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
7070 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
7073 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
7074 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
7075 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
7077 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
7078 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
7079 to such objects are allowed.
7082 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
7083 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
7084 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
7088 @node C++ Location Values
7089 @subsection C++ Location Values
7093 @c - %define "filename_type" "const symbol::Symbol"
7095 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
7096 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
7097 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
7098 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
7099 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
7101 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
7102 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
7103 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
7104 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
7105 "filename_type" "@var{type}"}.
7108 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
7109 The line, starting at 1.
7112 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
7113 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
7116 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
7117 The column, starting at 0.
7120 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
7121 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
7124 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
7125 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
7126 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
7127 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
7128 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
7131 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
7132 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
7133 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
7134 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
7137 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
7138 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
7139 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
7142 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
7143 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
7144 Advance the @code{end} position.
7147 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
7148 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
7149 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
7150 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
7153 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
7154 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
7158 @node C++ Parser Interface
7159 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
7160 @c - define parser_class_name
7162 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
7164 @c - Reporting errors
7166 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
7167 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
7168 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
7169 @samp{%define "parser_class_name" "@var{name}"}. The interface of
7170 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
7171 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
7172 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
7173 additional argument for its constructor.
7175 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_value_type}
7176 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_value_type}
7177 The types for semantics value and locations.
7180 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
7181 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
7182 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
7185 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
7186 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
7189 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
7190 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
7191 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
7195 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
7196 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
7197 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
7198 or nonzero, full tracing.
7201 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
7202 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
7203 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
7204 described by @var{m}.
7208 @node C++ Scanner Interface
7209 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
7210 @c - prefix for yylex.
7211 @c - Pure interface to yylex
7214 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
7215 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
7216 @code{%pure-parser} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
7218 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_value_type& @var{yylval}, location_type& @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
7219 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
7220 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
7221 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
7225 @node A Complete C++ Example
7226 @section A Complete C++ Example
7228 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
7229 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
7230 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
7231 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
7232 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
7233 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
7234 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
7235 actually easier to interface with.
7238 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
7239 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
7240 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
7241 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
7242 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
7245 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
7246 @subsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
7248 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
7249 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
7250 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
7251 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
7252 of valid input follows.
7256 seven := one + two * three
7260 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
7261 @subsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
7263 @c - A place to store error messages
7264 @c - A place for the result
7266 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
7267 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
7268 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
7269 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
7270 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
7271 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
7272 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
7274 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
7275 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
7276 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
7279 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7281 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
7282 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
7285 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
7290 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
7291 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
7292 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
7293 factor both as follows.
7295 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7297 // Announce to Flex the prototype we want for lexing function, ...
7299 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
7300 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
7301 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
7302 calcxx_driver& driver)
7303 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
7308 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
7311 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7313 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
7318 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
7320 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
7326 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
7327 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
7330 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7332 // Handling the scanner.
7335 bool trace_scanning;
7339 Similarly for the parser itself.
7341 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7343 // Handling the parser.
7344 void parse (const std::string& f);
7350 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
7351 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
7352 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
7353 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
7355 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7358 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
7359 void error (const std::string& m);
7361 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
7364 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
7365 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
7366 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
7367 messages and set error state.
7369 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
7371 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
7372 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
7374 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
7375 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
7377 variables["one"] = 1;
7378 variables["two"] = 2;
7381 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
7386 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
7390 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
7391 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
7397 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
7399 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
7403 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
7405 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
7410 @subsection Calc++ Parser
7412 The parser definition file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for
7413 the C++ LALR(1) skeleton, the creation of the parser header file, and
7414 specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
7415 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
7418 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7420 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
7423 %define "parser_class_name" "calcxx_parser"
7427 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
7428 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
7429 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
7430 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
7431 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
7432 use a forward declaration of the driver.
7434 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7438 class calcxx_driver;
7443 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
7444 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
7447 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7449 // The parsing context.
7450 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
7451 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
7455 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
7456 first location's file name. Afterwards new locations are computed
7457 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
7458 automatically propagated.
7460 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7465 // Initialize the initial location.
7466 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
7471 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
7474 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7481 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
7484 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7495 The code between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} after the introduction of the
7496 @samp{%union} is output in the @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed
7497 knowledge about the driver.
7499 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7502 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
7508 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
7509 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
7510 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
7511 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
7514 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7516 %token END 0 "end of file"
7518 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
7519 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
7520 %type <ival> exp "expression"
7524 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
7527 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
7528 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7530 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
7531 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
7533 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} "number" "expression"
7537 The grammar itself is straightforward.
7539 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7543 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
7545 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
7546 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
7548 assignment: "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; @};
7552 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
7553 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
7554 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
7555 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
7556 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; @}
7557 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
7562 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
7565 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
7568 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
7569 const std::string& m)
7571 driver.error (l, m);
7575 @node Calc++ Scanner
7576 @subsection Calc++ Scanner
7578 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
7579 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
7581 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7583 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
7586 # include <limits.h>
7588 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
7589 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
7591 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
7592 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
7593 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
7594 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
7598 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
7599 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
7600 not of token_type. */
7601 #define yyterminate() return token::END
7606 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
7607 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
7608 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
7609 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
7611 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7613 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
7617 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
7619 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7621 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
7627 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
7628 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
7629 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
7630 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
7631 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
7632 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
7633 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
7635 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7638 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
7644 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
7645 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
7649 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
7650 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
7651 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
7652 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
7654 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7657 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
7659 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
7660 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
7661 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
7664 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
7665 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
7666 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
7668 return token::NUMBER;
7670 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
7671 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
7676 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
7677 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
7679 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
7682 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
7684 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
7685 if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
7686 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file);
7690 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
7696 @node Calc++ Top Level
7697 @subsection Calc++ Top Level
7699 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
7701 @comment file: calc++.cc
7704 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
7707 main (int argc, char *argv[])
7709 calcxx_driver driver;
7710 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
7711 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
7712 driver.trace_parsing = true;
7713 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
7714 driver.trace_scanning = true;
7717 driver.parse (*argv);
7718 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
7723 @c ================================================= FAQ
7726 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
7727 @cindex frequently asked questions
7730 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
7734 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
7735 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
7736 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
7737 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
7738 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
7739 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison @acronym{POSIX} safe?
7740 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
7741 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
7742 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
7743 * Other Languages:: Parsers in Java and others
7744 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
7745 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
7748 @node Memory Exhausted
7749 @section Memory Exhausted
7752 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
7753 message. What can I do?
7756 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
7759 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
7760 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
7762 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
7763 following typical questions:
7766 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
7767 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
7768 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
7775 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
7776 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
7777 although I did specify I needed a @code{%pure-parser}.
7780 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
7781 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
7782 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
7783 demonstration, consider the following source file,
7784 @file{first-line.l}:
7792 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
7795 yyparse (char const *file)
7797 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
7800 /* One token only. */
7802 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
7817 If the file @file{input} contains
7825 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
7828 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
7829 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
7830 $ @kbd{./first-line}
7835 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
7836 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
7837 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
7838 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
7839 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
7840 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
7841 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
7842 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
7845 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
7846 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
7847 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
7848 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
7850 @node Strings are Destroyed
7851 @section Strings are Destroyed
7854 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
7855 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
7856 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
7859 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
7860 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
7861 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
7866 char *yylval = NULL;
7869 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
7875 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
7876 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
7877 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
7878 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
7883 If you compile and run this code, you get:
7886 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
7887 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
7888 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
7894 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
7895 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
7896 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
7897 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
7898 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
7899 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
7902 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
7903 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
7904 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
7909 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
7910 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
7913 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
7914 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
7917 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
7918 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
7919 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
7920 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
7921 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
7922 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
7923 execute simple instructions one after the others.
7925 @cindex abstract syntax tree
7926 @cindex @acronym{AST}
7927 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
7928 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
7929 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
7930 or @dfn{@acronym{AST}} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
7931 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
7932 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
7935 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
7936 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
7939 @node Multiple start-symbols
7940 @section Multiple start-symbols
7943 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
7944 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
7945 multiple entry points.
7948 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
7949 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
7950 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
7951 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
7955 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
7957 start: START_FOO foo
7961 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
7962 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
7964 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
7965 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
7966 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
7967 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
7968 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
7969 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
7970 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
7971 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
7979 int t = start_token;
7984 /* @r{The rules.} */
7988 @node Secure? Conform?
7989 @section Secure? Conform?
7992 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
7995 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
7996 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
7997 @acronym{POSIX} specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
7998 please send us a bug report.
8000 @node I can't build Bison
8001 @section I can't build Bison
8004 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
8005 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
8009 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
8010 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
8011 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
8012 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
8013 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
8014 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
8015 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
8018 @node Where can I find help?
8019 @section Where can I find help?
8022 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
8025 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
8026 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
8027 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
8028 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
8029 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
8030 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
8031 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
8032 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
8036 @section Bug Reports
8039 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
8042 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
8043 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
8044 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
8045 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
8046 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
8048 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
8049 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
8050 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
8051 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
8052 easier it will be to fix the bug.
8054 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
8055 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
8056 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
8057 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
8058 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
8059 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
8061 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
8062 send a bug report just because you can not provide a fix.
8064 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
8066 @node Other Languages
8067 @section Other Languages
8070 Will Bison ever have C++ support? How about Java or @var{insert your
8071 favorite language here}?
8074 C++ support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
8075 languages; contributions are welcome.
8078 @section Beta Testing
8081 What is involved in being a beta tester?
8084 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
8085 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
8086 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
8087 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
8088 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
8089 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
8092 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
8093 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
8094 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
8095 systems are especially welcome.
8098 @section Mailing Lists
8101 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
8104 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
8106 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
8108 @node Table of Symbols
8109 @appendix Bison Symbols
8110 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
8111 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
8113 @deffn {Variable} @@$
8114 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
8115 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
8118 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
8119 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
8120 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
8123 @deffn {Variable} $$
8124 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
8128 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
8129 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
8130 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
8133 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
8134 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
8135 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
8136 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
8139 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
8140 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
8141 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied directly to
8142 the output file uninterpreted. Such code forms the prologue of the input
8143 file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
8147 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
8148 Comment delimiters, as in C.
8151 @deffn {Delimiter} :
8152 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
8156 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
8157 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
8160 @deffn {Delimiter} |
8161 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
8162 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
8165 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
8166 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
8167 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
8168 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
8171 @deffn {Directive} %debug
8172 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8176 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
8177 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
8178 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
8183 @deffn {Directive} %defines
8184 Bison declaration to create a header file meant for the scanner.
8185 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8188 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
8189 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
8190 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
8193 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
8194 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
8195 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
8196 @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
8199 @deffn {Symbol} $end
8200 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
8201 used in the grammar.
8204 @deffn {Symbol} error
8205 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
8206 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
8207 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
8208 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
8209 token @code{error} becomes the current look-ahead token. Actions
8210 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the look-ahead
8211 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
8212 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8215 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
8216 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
8217 when @code{yyerror} is called.
8220 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix="@var{prefix}"
8221 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
8225 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
8226 Bison declaration to produce a @acronym{GLR} parser. @xref{GLR
8227 Parsers, ,Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
8230 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
8231 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
8234 @deffn {Directive} %left
8235 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
8236 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
8239 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
8240 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
8241 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
8245 @deffn {Directive} %merge
8246 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
8247 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
8248 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
8249 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
8252 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix="@var{prefix}"
8253 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8257 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
8258 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
8259 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
8264 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
8265 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
8266 parser file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8269 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
8270 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
8271 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
8274 @deffn {Directive} %output="@var{file}"
8275 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser file. @xref{Decl
8279 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
8280 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
8281 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
8282 Function @code{yyparse}}.
8285 @deffn {Directive} %prec
8286 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
8287 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
8290 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
8291 Bison declaration to request a pure (reentrant) parser.
8292 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
8295 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
8296 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
8297 Require a Version of Bison}.
8300 @deffn {Directive} %right
8301 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
8302 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
8305 @deffn {Directive} %start
8306 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
8310 @deffn {Directive} %token
8311 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
8312 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
8315 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
8316 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser file.
8317 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8320 @deffn {Directive} %type
8321 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
8322 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
8325 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
8326 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
8327 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
8331 @deffn {Directive} %union
8332 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
8333 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
8336 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
8337 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
8338 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
8339 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
8340 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
8343 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
8344 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
8345 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
8346 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
8349 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
8350 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a look-ahead
8351 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8354 @deffn {Variable} yychar
8355 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
8356 look-ahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
8357 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
8358 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8361 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
8362 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
8363 look-ahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
8366 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
8367 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
8368 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8371 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
8372 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
8373 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
8374 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8377 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
8378 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
8379 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
8382 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
8383 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
8384 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
8385 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
8386 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
8389 @deffn {Function} yyerror
8390 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
8391 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
8392 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
8395 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
8396 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
8397 to request verbose, specific error message strings
8398 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
8399 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
8400 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred.
8403 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
8404 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
8405 @xref{Memory Management}.
8408 @deffn {Function} yylex
8409 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
8410 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
8414 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
8415 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
8416 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
8417 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
8418 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
8421 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
8422 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
8423 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
8424 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
8426 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
8428 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
8429 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the look-ahead token.
8430 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
8433 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
8434 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
8435 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
8438 @deffn {Variable} yylval
8439 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
8440 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
8441 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
8443 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
8444 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the look-ahead token.
8445 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
8448 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
8449 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
8453 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
8454 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
8455 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}.)
8456 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
8459 @deffn {Function} yyparse
8460 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
8461 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
8464 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
8465 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
8466 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
8467 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
8468 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
8471 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
8472 Macro whose value indicates whether the parser is recovering from a
8473 syntax error. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8476 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
8477 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the C
8478 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
8479 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
8480 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
8481 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
8482 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
8484 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
8485 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
8486 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
8487 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
8488 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
8489 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
8490 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
8493 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
8494 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
8495 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
8503 @item Backus-Naur Form (@acronym{BNF}; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
8504 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
8505 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
8506 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
8507 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
8509 @item Context-free grammars
8510 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
8511 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
8512 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
8513 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
8516 @item Dynamic allocation
8517 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
8518 compile time or on entry to a function.
8521 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
8522 character string of length zero.
8524 @item Finite-state stack machine
8525 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
8526 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
8527 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
8528 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
8529 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
8530 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
8532 @item Generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR})
8533 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
8534 that are not @acronym{LALR}(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
8535 usual @acronym{LALR}(1)
8536 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
8537 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
8538 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
8539 @acronym{LR} Parsing}.
8542 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
8543 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
8544 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
8546 @item Infix operator
8547 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
8548 performs some operation.
8551 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
8553 @item Language construct
8554 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
8555 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
8556 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
8558 @item Left associativity
8559 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
8560 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
8561 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
8563 @item Left recursion
8564 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
8565 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
8568 @item Left-to-right parsing
8569 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
8570 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
8572 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
8573 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
8574 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
8576 @item Lexical tie-in
8577 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
8578 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
8580 @item Literal string token
8581 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
8583 @item Look-ahead token
8584 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Look-Ahead, ,Look-Ahead
8587 @item @acronym{LALR}(1)
8588 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
8589 generators) can handle; a subset of @acronym{LR}(1). @xref{Mystery
8590 Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
8592 @item @acronym{LR}(1)
8593 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
8594 look-ahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
8596 @item Nonterminal symbol
8597 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
8598 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
8599 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
8602 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
8603 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
8606 @item Postfix operator
8607 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
8608 performs some operation.
8611 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
8612 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
8616 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
8617 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
8618 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
8620 @item Reverse polish notation
8621 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
8623 @item Right recursion
8624 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
8625 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
8629 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
8630 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
8631 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
8634 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
8635 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
8636 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
8638 @item Single-character literal
8639 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
8640 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
8643 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
8644 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
8645 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
8646 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
8649 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
8650 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
8651 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
8654 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
8655 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
8658 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
8659 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
8660 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
8661 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
8663 @item Terminal symbol
8664 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
8665 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
8666 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
8669 @node Copying This Manual
8670 @appendix Copying This Manual
8673 * GNU Free Documentation License:: License for copying this manual.
8685 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout
8686 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex
8687 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry
8688 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa
8689 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc
8690 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Gen Comp Expr ltcalc mfcalc Decl Symtab yylex
8691 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref
8692 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex
8693 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge
8694 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG
8695 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit
8696 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok
8697 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr preg yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln
8698 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym
8699 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof
8700 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum
8701 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype
8702 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless typefull yynerrs
8703 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES
8704 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param
8705 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP
8706 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword
8707 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH
8708 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm VCG notype
8709 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args
8710 @c LocalWords: YYPRINTF infile ypp yxx outfile itemx vcg tex leaderfill
8711 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll
8712 @c LocalWords: yyrestart nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST
8713 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex