1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
190 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
191 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
192 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
193 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
194 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
196 Outline of a Bison Grammar
198 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
199 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
200 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
201 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
202 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
204 Defining Language Semantics
206 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
207 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
208 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
209 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
210 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
211 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
212 action in the middle of a rule.
216 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
217 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
218 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
222 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
223 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
224 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
225 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
226 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
227 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
228 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
229 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
230 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
231 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
232 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
233 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
234 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
235 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
236 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
238 Parser C-Language Interface
240 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
241 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
242 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
243 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
244 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
245 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
247 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
248 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
249 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
252 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
254 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
255 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
256 of the token it has read.
257 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
258 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
260 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
261 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
263 The Bison Parser Algorithm
265 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
266 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
267 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
268 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
269 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
270 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
271 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
272 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
273 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
274 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
278 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
279 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
280 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
281 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
282 * How Precedence:: How they work.
286 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
287 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
288 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
289 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
291 Handling Context Dependencies
293 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
294 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
295 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
296 error recovery rules must be written.
298 Debugging Your Parser
300 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
301 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
302 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
306 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
307 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
308 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
312 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
313 in alphabetical order by short options.
314 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
315 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
317 Parsers Written In Other Languages
319 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
320 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
324 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
325 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
326 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
327 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
328 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
329 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
333 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
334 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
335 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
337 A Complete C++ Example
339 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
340 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
341 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
342 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
343 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
347 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
348 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
349 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
350 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
351 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
352 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
353 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
354 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
356 Frequently Asked Questions
358 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
359 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
360 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
361 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
362 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
363 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
364 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
365 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
366 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
367 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
368 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
369 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
373 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
379 @unnumbered Introduction
382 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
383 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
384 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
385 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
386 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
387 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
388 calculators to complex programming languages.
390 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
391 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
392 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
393 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
394 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
397 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
398 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
399 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
400 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
403 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
404 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
405 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
406 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
407 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
408 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
411 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
414 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
416 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
417 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
418 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
419 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
420 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
422 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
424 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
425 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
426 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
427 License to all of the Bison source code.
429 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
430 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
431 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
432 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
433 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
434 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
435 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
437 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
438 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
439 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
440 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
441 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
442 using the other GNU tools.
444 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
445 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
446 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
447 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
451 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
452 @include gpl-3.0.texi
455 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
457 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
458 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
459 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
462 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
463 as mathematical ideas.
464 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
465 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
466 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
467 the name of an identifier, etc.).
468 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
469 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
470 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
471 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
472 how is the output used?
473 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
474 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
477 @node Language and Grammar
478 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
480 @cindex context-free grammar
481 @cindex grammar, context-free
482 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
483 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
484 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
485 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
486 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
487 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
488 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
489 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
493 @cindex Backus-Naur form
494 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
495 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
496 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
497 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
498 essentially machine-readable BNF.
500 @cindex LALR grammars
501 @cindex IELR grammars
503 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
504 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
505 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
506 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
507 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
508 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
509 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
510 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
511 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
512 Construction}, to learn how.
515 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
516 @cindex ambiguous grammars
517 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
519 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
520 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
521 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
522 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
523 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
524 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
525 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
526 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
527 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
528 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
529 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
530 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
531 possible parses of any given string is finite.
533 @cindex symbols (abstract)
535 @cindex syntactic grouping
536 @cindex grouping, syntactic
537 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
538 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
539 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
540 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
541 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
542 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
543 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
545 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
546 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
547 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
548 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
549 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
550 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
551 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
552 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
553 lexicography, not grammar.)
555 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
558 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
559 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
560 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
561 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
562 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
563 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
564 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
567 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
568 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
569 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
570 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
571 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
572 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
573 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
574 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
576 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
577 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
578 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
579 reads informally as follows:
582 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
587 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
591 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
592 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
593 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
594 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
597 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
598 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
599 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
600 not the start symbol.
602 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
603 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
604 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
605 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
606 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
607 reports a syntax error.
609 @node Grammar in Bison
610 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
611 @cindex Bison grammar
612 @cindex grammar, Bison
613 @cindex formal grammar
615 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
616 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
617 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
619 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
620 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
621 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
623 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
624 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
625 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
626 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
627 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
628 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
629 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
632 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
633 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
634 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
635 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
637 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
638 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
640 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
641 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
642 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
643 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
647 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
651 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
653 @node Semantic Values
654 @section Semantic Values
655 @cindex semantic value
656 @cindex value, semantic
658 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
659 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
660 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
661 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
662 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
665 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
666 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
667 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
668 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
669 ,Defining Language Semantics},
672 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
673 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
674 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
675 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
678 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
679 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
680 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
681 need to have any semantic value.)
683 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
684 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
685 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
686 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
687 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
688 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
690 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
691 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
692 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
693 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
694 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
696 @node Semantic Actions
697 @section Semantic Actions
698 @cindex semantic actions
699 @cindex actions, semantic
701 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
702 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
703 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
704 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
707 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
708 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
709 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
710 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
711 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
712 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
713 newly recognized larger expression.
715 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
719 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
723 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
724 from the values of the two subexpressions.
727 @section Writing GLR Parsers
729 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
732 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
733 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
735 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
736 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
737 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
738 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
739 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
740 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
741 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
742 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
743 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
745 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
746 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
747 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
748 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
749 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
750 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
751 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
752 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
753 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
754 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
755 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
756 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
757 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
758 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
759 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
760 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
761 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
762 identical set of symbols.
764 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
765 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
766 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
767 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
768 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
769 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
770 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
771 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
772 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
776 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
777 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
778 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
779 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
780 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
783 @node Simple GLR Parsers
784 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
785 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
786 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
790 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
791 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
793 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
794 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
795 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
797 Consider a problem that
798 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
799 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
802 type subrange = lo .. hi;
803 type enum = (a, b, c);
807 The original language standard allows only numeric
808 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
809 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
810 10206) and many other
811 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
812 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
816 type subrange = (a) .. b;
820 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
821 type with only one value:
828 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
829 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
831 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
832 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
833 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
834 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
835 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
836 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
837 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
838 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
840 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
841 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
842 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
843 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
846 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
847 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
848 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
849 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
850 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
851 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
854 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
855 use the GLR algorithm.
856 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
857 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
858 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
859 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
860 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
861 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
862 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
863 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
864 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
866 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
867 reports a syntax error as usual.
869 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
870 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
871 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
872 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
873 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
875 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
876 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
877 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
878 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
879 The present example contains only one conflict between two
880 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
881 cannot be nested. So the number of
882 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
883 and the parsing time is still linear.
885 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
886 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
889 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
899 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
928 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
929 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
930 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
931 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
938 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
939 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
940 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
949 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
950 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
951 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
952 notice when the parser splits.
954 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
955 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
956 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
957 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
958 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
959 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
960 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
961 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
962 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
963 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
964 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
965 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
966 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
969 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
970 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
971 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
972 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
973 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
974 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
976 @node Merging GLR Parses
977 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
978 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
979 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
983 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
985 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
990 #define YYSTYPE char const *
992 void yyerror (char const *);
1006 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1015 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1016 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1017 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1018 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1019 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1023 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1024 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1025 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1026 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1030 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1031 | '(' declarator ')'
1036 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1037 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1044 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1045 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1046 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1047 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1048 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1049 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1050 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1051 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1052 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1053 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1054 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1055 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1056 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1057 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1059 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1060 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1061 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1062 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1063 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1064 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1065 The parser therefore prints
1068 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1071 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1072 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1079 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1080 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1081 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1082 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1083 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1084 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1085 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1086 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1087 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1088 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1094 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1095 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1096 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1097 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1102 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1103 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1108 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1112 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1120 with an accompanying forward declaration
1121 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1125 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1126 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1131 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1132 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1135 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1138 Bison requires that all of the
1139 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1140 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1141 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1142 the offending merge.
1144 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1145 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1147 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1148 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1150 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1151 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1152 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1153 the associated reduction.
1154 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1155 action in a GLR parser.
1158 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1160 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1162 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1163 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1164 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1165 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1166 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1167 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1168 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1169 influence syntax analysis.
1170 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1173 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1174 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1175 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1176 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1177 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1178 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1179 future versions of Bison.
1180 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1181 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1182 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1184 @subsubsection YYERROR
1186 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1187 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1188 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1189 initiate error recovery.
1190 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1191 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1192 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1193 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1194 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1195 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1196 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1197 the parse that invoked the test.
1199 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1200 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1201 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1204 @node Semantic Predicates
1205 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1207 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1209 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1211 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1212 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1213 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1214 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1218 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1219 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1224 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1225 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1226 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1227 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1228 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1229 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1230 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1232 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1233 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1234 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1235 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1238 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1239 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1240 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1244 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1245 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1246 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1247 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1252 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1253 false). However, this
1254 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1255 have overlapping syntax.
1256 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1257 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1258 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1259 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1262 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1263 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1265 @node Compiler Requirements
1266 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1267 @cindex @code{inline}
1268 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1270 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1271 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1272 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1273 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1274 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1275 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1284 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1288 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1289 && ! defined inline)
1298 @cindex textual location
1299 @cindex location, textual
1301 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1302 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1303 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1304 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1306 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1307 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1308 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1309 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1312 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1313 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1314 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1317 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1318 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1319 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1320 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1321 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1322 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1323 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1326 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1327 @cindex Bison parser
1328 @cindex Bison utility
1329 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1332 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1333 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1334 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1335 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1336 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1337 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1338 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1341 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1342 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1343 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1346 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1347 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1348 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1349 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1350 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1351 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1352 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1354 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1355 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1356 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1357 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1358 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1359 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1360 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1361 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1362 C-Language Interface}.
1364 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1365 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1366 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1367 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1368 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1369 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1370 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1371 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1372 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1373 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1374 anything other than their usual meanings.
1376 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1377 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1378 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1379 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1380 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1381 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1382 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1383 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1384 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1387 @section Stages in Using Bison
1388 @cindex stages in using Bison
1391 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1392 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1396 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1397 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1398 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1399 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1400 sequence of C statements.
1403 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1404 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1405 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1406 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1409 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1412 Write error-reporting routines.
1415 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1416 must follow these steps:
1420 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1423 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1426 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1429 @node Grammar Layout
1430 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1431 @cindex grammar file
1433 @cindex format of grammar file
1434 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1436 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1437 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1444 @var{Bison declarations}
1453 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1454 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1456 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1457 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1458 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1459 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1460 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1461 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1463 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1464 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1465 semantic values of various symbols.
1467 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1470 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1471 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1472 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1476 @cindex simple examples
1477 @cindex examples, simple
1479 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1480 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1481 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1482 and a multi-function calculator. All
1483 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1485 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1486 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1487 source file to try them.
1490 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1491 a first example with no operator precedence.
1492 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1493 Operator precedence is introduced.
1494 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1495 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1496 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1497 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1498 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1502 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1503 @cindex reverse polish notation
1504 @cindex polish notation calculator
1505 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1506 @cindex calculator, simple
1508 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1509 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1510 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1511 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1513 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1514 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1517 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1518 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1519 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1520 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1521 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1522 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1523 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1526 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1527 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1529 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1530 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1532 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1534 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1537 #define YYSTYPE double
1541 void yyerror (char const *);
1546 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1549 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1550 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1552 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1553 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1554 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1555 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1556 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1557 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1558 which is a floating point number.
1560 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1561 function @code{pow}.
1563 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1564 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1565 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1566 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1569 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1570 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1571 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1572 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1573 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1574 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1575 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1576 type for numeric constants.
1579 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1581 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1583 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1595 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1602 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1603 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1604 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1605 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1606 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1607 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1613 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1614 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1615 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1616 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1617 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1620 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1621 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1622 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1624 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1625 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1626 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1627 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1628 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1629 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1632 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1633 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1634 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1638 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1640 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1649 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1650 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1651 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1652 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1653 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1655 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1656 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1657 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1658 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1659 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1660 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1662 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1663 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1664 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1665 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1668 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1669 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1670 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1673 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1675 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1680 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1684 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1685 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1686 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1687 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1688 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1689 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1690 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1692 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1693 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1694 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1695 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1696 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1699 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1701 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1702 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1703 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1704 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1709 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1710 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1715 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1716 equally well have written them separately:
1720 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1721 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1725 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1726 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1727 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1728 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1729 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1730 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1731 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1732 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1734 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1735 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1736 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1738 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1739 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1743 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1747 means the same thing as this:
1752 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1758 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1761 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1762 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1763 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1765 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1766 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1767 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1768 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1770 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1772 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1773 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1774 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1775 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1777 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1778 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1779 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1780 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1781 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1782 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1783 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1784 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1785 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1787 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1788 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1789 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1790 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1791 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1793 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1794 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1796 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1798 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1801 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1802 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1803 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1804 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1815 /* Skip white space. */
1816 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1820 /* Process numbers. */
1821 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1824 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1829 /* Return end-of-input. */
1832 /* Return a single char. */
1839 @subsection The Controlling Function
1840 @cindex controlling function
1841 @cindex main function in simple example
1843 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1844 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1845 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1847 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1859 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1860 @cindex error reporting routine
1862 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1863 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1864 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1865 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1866 here is the definition we will use:
1868 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1875 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1877 yyerror (char const *s)
1879 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1884 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1885 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1886 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1887 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1888 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1889 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1891 @node Rpcalc Generate
1892 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1893 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1895 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1896 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1897 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1898 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1899 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1900 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1902 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1903 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1905 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1906 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1913 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1914 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1915 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1916 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1917 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1918 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1919 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1921 @node Rpcalc Compile
1922 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1923 @cindex compiling the parser
1925 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1929 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1931 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1935 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1936 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1937 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1941 # @r{List files again.}
1943 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1947 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1948 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1954 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1956 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1959 @result{} -3.166666667
1960 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1962 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1967 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1968 @cindex infix notation calculator
1970 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1972 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1973 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1974 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1975 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1978 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1982 #define YYSTYPE double
1986 void yyerror (char const *);
1991 /* Bison declarations. */
1995 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1996 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1999 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2010 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2017 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2018 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2019 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2020 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2021 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2022 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2023 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2030 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2033 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2035 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2036 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2037 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2038 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2039 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2040 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2041 the associativity/precedence.)
2043 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2044 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2045 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2046 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2047 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2048 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2051 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2052 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2053 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2054 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2055 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2057 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2062 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2070 @node Simple Error Recovery
2071 @section Simple Error Recovery
2072 @cindex error recovery, simple
2074 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2075 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2076 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2077 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2078 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2079 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2081 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2082 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2083 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2089 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2090 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2095 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2096 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2097 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2098 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2099 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2100 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2101 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2102 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2105 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2106 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2107 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2108 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2109 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2110 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2113 @node Location Tracking Calc
2114 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2115 @cindex location tracking calculator
2116 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2117 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2119 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2120 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2121 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2122 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2126 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2127 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2128 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2131 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2132 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2134 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2135 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2138 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2144 void yyerror (char const *);
2147 /* Bison declarations. */
2155 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2159 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2160 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2161 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2162 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2163 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2164 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2165 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2169 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2171 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2172 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2173 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2174 from the new information.
2176 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2177 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2190 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2197 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2198 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2199 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2209 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2210 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2211 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2216 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2217 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2218 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2222 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2223 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2224 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2226 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2227 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2228 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2229 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2230 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2231 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2235 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2237 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2238 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2239 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2242 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2243 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2254 /* Skip white space. */
2255 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2256 ++yylloc.last_column;
2261 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2262 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2266 /* Process numbers. */
2270 ++yylloc.last_column;
2271 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2273 ++yylloc.last_column;
2274 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2281 /* Return end-of-input. */
2286 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2290 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2293 ++yylloc.last_column;
2299 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2300 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2301 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2302 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2304 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2305 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2306 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2307 controlling function:
2314 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2315 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2321 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2322 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2323 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2325 @node Multi-function Calc
2326 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2327 @cindex multi-function calculator
2328 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2329 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2331 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2332 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2333 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2334 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2335 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2337 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2338 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2339 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2340 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2341 functions whose syntax has this form:
2344 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2348 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2349 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2350 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2355 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2356 @result{} 3.1415926536
2360 @result{} 0.0000000000
2362 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2363 @result{} 2.3000000000
2365 @result{} 2.3000000000
2367 @result{} 0.8329091229
2368 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2369 @result{} 2.3000000000
2373 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2376 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2377 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2378 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2379 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2380 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2383 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2384 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2386 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2388 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2392 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2393 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2394 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2396 void yyerror (char const *);
2402 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2403 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2406 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2407 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2414 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2415 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2419 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2420 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2421 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2423 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2424 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2425 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2426 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2428 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2429 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2430 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2431 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2432 between angle brackets).
2434 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2435 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2436 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2437 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2438 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2439 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2442 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2444 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2445 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2446 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2448 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2450 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2461 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2462 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2469 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2470 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2471 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2472 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2473 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2474 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2475 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2476 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2477 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2478 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2481 /* End of grammar. */
2485 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2486 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2487 @cindex symbol table example
2489 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2490 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2491 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2492 requires some additional C functions for support.
2494 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2495 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2496 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2498 @comment file: calc.h
2501 /* Function type. */
2502 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2506 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2509 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2510 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2513 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2514 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2516 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2521 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2523 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2524 extern symrec *sym_table;
2526 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2527 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2531 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2534 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2540 double (*fnct) (double);
2545 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2558 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2563 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2569 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2571 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2572 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2578 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2579 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2581 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2582 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2583 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2584 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2585 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2586 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2588 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2590 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2591 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2595 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2597 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2598 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2599 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2600 ptr->type = sym_type;
2601 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2602 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2610 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2613 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2614 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2615 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2623 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2625 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2626 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2627 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2628 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2630 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2631 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2632 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2633 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2634 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2635 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2637 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2638 operators in @code{yylex}.
2640 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2652 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2653 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2661 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2662 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2665 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2671 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2674 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2675 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2676 static size_t length = 40;
2677 static char *symbuf = 0;
2682 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2688 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2692 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2694 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2696 /* Get another character. */
2701 while (isalnum (c));
2708 s = getsym (symbuf);
2710 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2715 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2722 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2724 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2725 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2726 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2728 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2731 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2733 yyerror (char const *s)
2735 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2741 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2744 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2745 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2746 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2754 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2755 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2756 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2764 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2767 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2768 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2769 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2772 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2773 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2777 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2779 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2780 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2782 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2783 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2786 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2787 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2788 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2789 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2790 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2791 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2792 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2793 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2794 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2797 @node Grammar Outline
2798 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2800 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2801 appropriate delimiters:
2808 @var{Bison declarations}
2817 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2818 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2819 continues until end of line.
2822 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2823 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2824 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2825 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2826 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2830 @subsection The prologue
2831 @cindex declarations section
2833 @cindex declarations
2835 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2836 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2837 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2838 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2839 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2840 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2841 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2843 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2844 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2847 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2848 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2849 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2850 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2851 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2852 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2853 @code{%union} declaration.
2864 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2868 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2869 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2875 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2876 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2877 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2878 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2879 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2880 @code{#include} directives.
2882 @node Prologue Alternatives
2883 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2884 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2887 @findex %code requires
2888 @findex %code provides
2891 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2892 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2893 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2894 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2895 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2896 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2897 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2899 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2910 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2914 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2915 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2922 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2923 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2924 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2925 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2926 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2927 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2928 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2929 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2930 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2931 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2932 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2934 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2935 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2936 This behavior raises a few questions.
2937 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2938 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2939 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2940 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2941 This behavior is not intuitive.
2943 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2944 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2945 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2946 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2953 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2954 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2957 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2958 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2970 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2974 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2975 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2976 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2983 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2984 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2985 explicit which kind you intend.
2986 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2988 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2989 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2990 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2991 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2992 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2993 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2994 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2995 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2996 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2999 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3000 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3002 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3020 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3026 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3027 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3040 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3041 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3042 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3050 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3051 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3052 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3053 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3054 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3055 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3057 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3058 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3059 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3060 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3061 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3062 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3063 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3064 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3065 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3066 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3067 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3070 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3071 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3072 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3073 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3074 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3075 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3076 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3077 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3078 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3079 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3097 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3103 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3104 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3117 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3123 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3124 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3132 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3133 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3134 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3137 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3138 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3139 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3140 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3141 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3142 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3145 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3146 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3147 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3148 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3150 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3151 organize your grammar file.
3152 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3157 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3158 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3159 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3160 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3164 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3165 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3166 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3167 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3172 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3173 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3175 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3177 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3178 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3179 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3180 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3182 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3183 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3184 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3185 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3186 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3187 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3188 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3189 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3192 @node Bison Declarations
3193 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3194 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3195 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3197 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3198 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3199 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3200 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3203 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3204 @cindex grammar rules section
3205 @cindex rules section for grammar
3207 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3208 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3210 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3211 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3212 if it is the first thing in the file.
3215 @subsection The epilogue
3216 @cindex additional C code section
3218 @cindex C code, section for additional
3220 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3221 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3222 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3223 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3224 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3225 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3226 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3227 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3228 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3229 C-Language Interface}.
3231 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3232 from the grammar rules.
3234 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3235 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3236 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3237 of the grammar file.
3240 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3241 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3242 @cindex terminal symbol
3246 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3249 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3250 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3251 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3252 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3253 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3254 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3255 the symbol to stand for it.
3257 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3258 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3259 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3261 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3262 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3263 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3264 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3265 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3266 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3267 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3269 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3273 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3274 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3275 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3276 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3279 @cindex character token
3280 @cindex literal token
3281 @cindex single-character literal
3282 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3283 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3284 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3285 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3286 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3287 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3288 ,Operator Precedence}).
3290 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3291 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3292 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3293 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3294 your program will confuse other readers.
3296 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3297 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3298 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3299 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3300 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3301 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3305 @cindex string token
3306 @cindex literal string token
3307 @cindex multicharacter literal
3308 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3309 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3310 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3311 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3312 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3314 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3315 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3316 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3317 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3318 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3320 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3322 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3323 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3324 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3325 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3326 read your program will be confused.
3328 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3329 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3330 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3331 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3332 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3333 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3336 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3337 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3338 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3340 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3341 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3342 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3343 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3344 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3345 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3346 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3347 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3348 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3349 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3350 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3351 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3353 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3354 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3355 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3356 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3357 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3359 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3360 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3361 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3362 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3363 characters in the following C-language string:
3366 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3369 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3370 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3371 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3372 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3373 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3374 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3375 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3376 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3377 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3378 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3381 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3382 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3383 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3384 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3385 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3388 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3390 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3391 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3393 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3397 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3402 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3403 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3404 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3415 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3416 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3418 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3419 extra white space as you wish.
3421 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3422 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3425 @{@var{C statements}@}
3430 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3431 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3432 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3433 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3434 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3435 compiler can check it.
3437 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3438 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3439 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3440 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3441 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3442 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3443 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3444 character constants.
3446 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3450 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3451 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3456 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3457 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3464 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3466 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3467 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3468 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3487 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3491 @section Recursive Rules
3492 @cindex recursive rule
3494 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3495 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3496 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3497 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3498 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3509 @cindex left recursion
3510 @cindex right recursion
3512 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3513 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3514 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3526 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3527 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3528 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3529 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3530 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3531 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3532 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3535 @cindex mutual recursion
3536 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3537 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3538 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3547 | primary '+' primary
3560 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3564 @section Defining Language Semantics
3565 @cindex defining language semantics
3566 @cindex language semantics, defining
3568 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3569 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3570 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3572 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3573 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3574 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3575 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3578 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3579 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3580 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3581 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3582 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3583 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3584 action in the middle of a rule.
3588 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3589 @cindex semantic value type
3590 @cindex value type, semantic
3591 @cindex data types of semantic values
3592 @cindex default data type
3594 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3595 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3596 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3597 Notation Calculator}).
3599 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3600 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3601 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3604 #define YYSTYPE double
3608 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3609 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3610 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3611 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3613 @node Multiple Types
3614 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3616 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3617 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3618 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3619 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3622 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3623 requires you to do two things:
3627 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3628 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3629 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3630 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3634 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3635 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3636 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3637 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3638 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3647 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3649 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3650 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3651 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3652 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3654 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3655 placed at any position in the rule;
3656 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3657 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3658 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3659 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3661 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3662 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3663 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3664 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3665 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3666 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3667 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3668 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3669 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3670 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3673 Here is a typical example:
3679 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3683 Or, in terms of named references:
3689 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3694 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3695 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3696 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3697 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3698 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3699 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3701 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3702 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3703 referred to as @code{$2}.
3705 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3706 references construct.
3708 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3709 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3710 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3711 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3712 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3716 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3720 @cindex default action
3721 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3722 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3723 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3724 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3725 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3726 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3728 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3729 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3730 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3731 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3732 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3737 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3738 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3744 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3749 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3750 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3751 definition of @code{foo}.
3754 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3755 any, from a semantic action.
3756 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3757 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3760 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3761 @cindex action data types
3762 @cindex data types in actions
3764 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3765 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3767 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3768 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3769 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3770 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3771 in the rule. In this example,
3777 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3782 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3783 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3784 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3785 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3787 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3788 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3789 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3801 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3802 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3804 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3805 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3806 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3807 @cindex mid-rule actions
3809 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3810 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3811 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3813 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3814 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3815 it is run before they are parsed.
3817 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3818 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3819 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3820 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3823 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3824 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3825 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3826 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3827 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3828 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3830 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3831 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3832 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3833 at the end of the rule.
3835 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3836 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3837 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3838 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3839 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3840 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3846 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3848 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3853 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3854 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3855 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3856 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3857 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3858 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3859 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3860 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3862 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3863 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3864 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3865 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3866 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3869 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3870 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3871 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3872 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3873 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3875 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3876 Discarded Symbols}).
3877 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3878 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3880 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3881 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3886 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3900 $$ = push_context ();
3901 declare_variable ($3);
3908 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3909 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3910 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3912 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3913 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3914 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3915 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3916 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3922 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3923 | '@{' statements '@}'
3929 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3934 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3935 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3938 | '@{' statements '@}'
3944 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3945 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3946 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3947 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3948 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3949 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3951 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3952 actions into the two rules, like this:
3957 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3958 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3959 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3960 '@{' statements '@}'
3966 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3967 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3969 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3970 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3971 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3976 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3977 declarations statements '@}'
3978 | '@{' statements '@}'
3984 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3985 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3987 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3988 serves as a subroutine:
3993 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3999 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4000 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4006 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4007 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4009 @node Tracking Locations
4010 @section Tracking Locations
4012 @cindex textual location
4013 @cindex location, textual
4015 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4016 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4017 especially symbol locations.
4019 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4020 actions to take when rules are matched.
4023 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4024 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4025 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4029 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4030 @cindex data type of locations
4031 @cindex default location type
4033 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4034 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4036 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4037 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4038 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4039 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4043 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4052 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4053 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4054 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4055 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4056 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4058 @node Actions and Locations
4059 @subsection Actions and Locations
4060 @cindex location actions
4061 @cindex actions, location
4064 @vindex @@@var{name}
4065 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4067 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4068 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4070 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4071 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4072 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4073 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4074 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4077 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4078 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4079 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4080 references construct.
4082 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4090 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4091 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4092 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4093 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4100 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4101 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4102 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4108 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4109 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4110 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4113 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4114 example above simply rewrites this way:
4128 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4129 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4130 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4137 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4138 from a semantic action.
4139 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4140 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4142 @node Location Default Action
4143 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4144 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4145 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4147 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4148 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4149 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4150 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4151 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4152 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4153 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4154 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4157 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4158 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4160 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4161 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4162 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4163 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4164 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4165 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4166 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4167 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4168 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4169 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4171 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4175 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4179 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4180 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4181 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4182 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4186 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4187 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4188 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4189 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4196 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4197 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4198 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4200 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4204 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4205 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4208 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4209 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4210 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4211 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4214 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4215 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4216 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4217 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4220 @node Named References
4221 @section Named References
4222 @cindex named references
4224 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4225 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4226 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4227 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4228 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4229 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4231 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4232 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4233 used as named references. For example:
4237 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4238 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4243 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4247 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4248 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4253 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4259 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4262 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4265 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4270 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4271 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4272 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4275 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4276 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4281 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4282 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4283 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4286 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4287 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4293 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4294 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4297 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4298 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4302 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4303 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4304 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4305 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4306 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4307 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4308 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4310 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4314 @section Bison Declarations
4315 @cindex declarations, Bison
4316 @cindex Bison declarations
4318 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4319 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4322 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4323 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4324 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4325 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4327 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4328 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4329 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4330 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4333 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4334 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4335 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4336 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4337 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4338 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4339 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4340 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4341 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4342 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4343 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4344 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4345 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4346 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4347 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4351 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4352 @cindex version requirement
4353 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4356 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4357 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4361 %require "@var{version}"
4365 @subsection Token Type Names
4366 @cindex declaring token type names
4367 @cindex token type names, declaring
4368 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4371 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4377 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4378 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4379 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4381 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4382 @code{%precedence}, or
4383 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4384 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4387 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4388 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4389 following the token name:
4393 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4397 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4398 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4399 with each other or with normal characters.
4401 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4402 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4403 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4404 Than One Value Type}).
4410 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4414 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4418 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4419 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4420 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4427 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4428 equivalent literal string tokens:
4431 %token <operator> OR "||"
4432 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4437 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4438 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4439 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4440 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4441 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4442 the literal string instead of the token name.
4444 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4445 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4449 %token END 0 "end of file"
4452 @node Precedence Decl
4453 @subsection Operator Precedence
4454 @cindex precedence declarations
4455 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4456 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4458 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4459 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4460 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4461 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4462 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4463 operator precedence.
4465 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4466 @code{%token}: either
4469 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4476 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4479 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4480 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4481 all the @var{symbols}:
4485 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4486 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4487 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4488 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4489 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4490 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4491 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4492 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4493 considered a syntax error.
4495 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4496 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4497 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4500 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4501 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4502 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4503 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4504 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4507 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4508 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4509 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4510 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4515 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4516 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4520 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4521 @cindex declaring value types
4522 @cindex value types, declaring
4525 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4526 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4527 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4542 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4543 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4544 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4545 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4547 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4548 @code{union}. For example:
4560 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4561 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4564 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4565 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4566 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4568 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4569 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4571 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4572 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4573 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4574 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4582 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4587 and then your grammar can use the following
4588 instead of @code{%union}:
4601 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4602 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4603 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4607 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4608 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4609 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4612 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4616 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4617 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4618 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4619 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4620 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4623 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4624 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4625 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4626 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4628 @node Initial Action Decl
4629 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4630 @findex %initial-action
4632 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4633 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4636 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4637 @findex %initial-action
4638 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4639 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4640 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4641 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4644 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4647 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4650 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4655 @node Destructor Decl
4656 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4657 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4661 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4662 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4663 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4664 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4665 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4666 must discard the start symbol.
4668 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4669 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4670 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4671 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4673 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4674 symbol is automatically discarded.
4676 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4678 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4679 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4680 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4681 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4682 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4685 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4686 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4687 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4688 tag among @var{symbols}.
4689 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4690 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4691 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4693 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4694 (These default forms are experimental.
4695 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4697 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4698 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4699 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4700 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4702 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4703 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4704 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4705 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4706 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4713 %union @{ char *string; @}
4714 %token <string> STRING1
4715 %token <string> STRING2
4716 %type <string> string1
4717 %type <string> string2
4718 %union @{ char character; @}
4719 %token <character> CHR
4720 %type <character> chr
4723 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4724 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4725 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4726 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4730 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4731 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4732 to @code{free} by default.
4733 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4734 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4735 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4736 @code{free} only once.
4737 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4738 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4740 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4741 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4742 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4743 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4744 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4745 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4746 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4747 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4748 reference it in your grammar.
4749 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4750 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4756 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4757 @cindex mid-rule actions
4758 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4759 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4760 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4761 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4762 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4763 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4764 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4765 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4769 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4770 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4771 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4776 @cindex discarded symbols
4777 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4781 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4783 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4785 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4786 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4788 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4789 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4792 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4795 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4796 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4799 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4800 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4801 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4805 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4806 @cindex printing semantic values
4810 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4811 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4812 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4813 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4815 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4816 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4817 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4819 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4822 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4823 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4824 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4825 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4826 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4827 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4828 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4831 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4832 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4833 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4834 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4842 %union @{ char *string; @}
4843 %token <string> STRING1
4844 %token <string> STRING2
4845 %type <string> string1
4846 %type <string> string2
4847 %union @{ char character; @}
4848 %token <character> CHR
4849 %type <character> chr
4852 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4853 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4854 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4855 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4859 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4860 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4861 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4862 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4863 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4864 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4865 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4869 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4870 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4871 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4872 @cindex warnings, preventing
4873 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4877 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4878 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4879 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4880 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4881 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4882 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4884 The declaration looks like this:
4890 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4891 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4892 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4893 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4895 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4896 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4897 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4898 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4899 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4900 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4901 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4907 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4911 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4912 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4913 print the number of conflicts.
4916 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4917 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4918 go back to the beginning.
4921 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4922 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4923 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4926 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4927 but will keep silent otherwise.
4930 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4931 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4932 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4933 @cindex default start symbol
4936 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4937 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4938 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4945 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4946 @cindex reentrant parser
4948 @findex %define api.pure
4950 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4951 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4952 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4953 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4954 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4955 program must be called only within interlocks.
4957 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4958 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4959 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4960 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4961 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4963 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4964 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4965 reentrant. It looks like this:
4971 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4972 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4973 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4974 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4975 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4976 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4977 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4978 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4979 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4981 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4982 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4986 @subsection A Push Parser
4989 @findex %define api.push-pull
4991 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4992 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4994 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4995 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4996 each time a new token is made available.
4998 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4999 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5000 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5001 within a certain time period.
5003 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5004 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5005 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5008 %define api.push-pull push
5011 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5012 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5013 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5014 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5015 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5019 %define api.push-pull push
5022 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5023 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5024 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5025 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5027 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5028 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5029 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5030 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5031 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5032 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5033 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5034 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5038 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5040 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5041 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5042 yypstate_delete (ps);
5045 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5046 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5047 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5048 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5049 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5050 example would thus look like this:
5055 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5058 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5059 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5060 yypstate_delete (ps);
5063 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5064 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5066 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5067 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5068 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5069 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5070 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5071 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5072 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5073 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5074 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5075 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5076 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5077 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5078 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5079 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5080 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5081 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5082 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5086 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5087 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5088 yypstate_delete (ps);
5091 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5092 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5093 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5096 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5097 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5098 @cindex declaration summary
5099 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5101 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5103 @deffn {Directive} %union
5104 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5105 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5108 @deffn {Directive} %token
5109 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5110 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5113 @deffn {Directive} %right
5114 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5115 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5118 @deffn {Directive} %left
5119 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5120 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5123 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5124 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5125 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5126 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5130 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5131 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5132 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5136 @deffn {Directive} %type
5137 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5138 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5141 @deffn {Directive} %start
5142 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5146 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5147 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5148 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5154 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5157 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5158 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5160 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5161 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5162 @xref{%code Summary}.
5165 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5166 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5168 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5171 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5172 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5173 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5174 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5177 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5178 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5179 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5180 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5181 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5183 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5184 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5185 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5186 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5187 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5188 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5189 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5190 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5191 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5192 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5194 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5195 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5196 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5198 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5199 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5200 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5202 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5203 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5204 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5205 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5206 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5208 @findex %code requires
5209 @findex %code provides
5210 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5211 header also contains their code.
5212 @xref{%code Summary}.
5214 @cindex Header guard
5215 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5216 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5217 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5218 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5219 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5222 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5223 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5225 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5226 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5228 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5232 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5233 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5236 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5237 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5238 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5241 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5242 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5243 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5246 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5247 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5248 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5249 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5251 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5255 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5256 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5257 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5258 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5259 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5260 accurate syntax error messages.
5263 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5264 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5265 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5267 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5268 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5269 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5270 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5271 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5272 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5273 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5274 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5276 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5280 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5281 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5282 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5287 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5288 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5289 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5290 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5291 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5292 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5293 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5297 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5298 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5301 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5302 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5303 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5307 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5308 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5309 Require a Version of Bison}.
5312 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5313 Specify the skeleton to use.
5315 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5316 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5317 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5318 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5320 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5321 file in the Bison installation directory.
5322 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5323 directory of the grammar file.
5324 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5327 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5328 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5329 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5330 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5331 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5332 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5333 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5336 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5337 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5338 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5339 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5340 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5341 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5342 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5345 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5346 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5347 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5351 The highest token number, plus one.
5353 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5355 The number of grammar rules,
5357 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5361 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5362 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5363 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5364 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5368 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5369 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5370 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5374 @node %define Summary
5375 @subsection %define Summary
5377 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5378 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5379 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5380 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5381 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5382 @code{%define} directive:
5384 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5385 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5386 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5387 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5389 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5390 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5391 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5392 to specifying @code{""}.
5394 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5395 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5396 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5399 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5400 @code{%define} accepts.
5402 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5403 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5407 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5409 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5410 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5412 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5414 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5415 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5418 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5419 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5420 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5421 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5422 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5423 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5426 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5428 @findex %define api.namespace
5430 @item Languages(s): C++
5432 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5433 For example, if you specify:
5436 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5439 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5442 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5445 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5446 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5449 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5455 @item Accepted Values:
5456 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5457 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5459 @item Default Value:
5460 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5461 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5462 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5463 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5464 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5465 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5466 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5469 %define api.namespace "foo"
5470 %name-prefix "bar::"
5473 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5478 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5479 @item @code{api.location.type}
5480 @findex %define api.location.type
5483 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5485 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5486 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5488 @item Accepted Values: String
5490 @item Default Value: none
5492 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5495 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5497 @findex %define api.prefix
5500 @item Language(s): All
5502 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5503 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5505 @item Accepted Values: String
5507 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5509 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5512 @c ================================================== api.pure
5514 @findex %define api.pure
5517 @item Language(s): C
5519 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5520 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5522 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5524 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5530 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5532 @findex %define api.push-pull
5535 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5537 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5538 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5539 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5540 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5542 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5544 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5550 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5551 @item api.token.prefix
5552 @findex %define api.token.prefix
5555 @item Languages(s): all
5558 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5559 target language. For instance
5562 %token FILE for ERROR
5563 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
5565 start: FILE for ERROR;
5569 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5570 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5571 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5572 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5573 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5574 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5575 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5577 @item Accepted Values:
5578 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5579 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5580 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5582 @item Default Value:
5585 introduced in Bison 2.8
5590 @c ================================================== lex_symbol
5592 @findex %define lex_symbol
5599 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5600 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5601 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5603 @item Accepted Values:
5606 @item Default Value:
5612 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
5614 @item lr.default-reduction
5615 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
5618 @item Language(s): all
5620 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5621 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5622 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5623 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5625 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5626 @item Default Value:
5628 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5629 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5632 introduced as @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.5, renamed as
5633 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.8.
5636 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
5638 @item lr.keep-unreachable-state
5639 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
5642 @item Language(s): all
5643 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5644 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5645 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5646 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5648 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
5649 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.5, and as
5650 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.8.
5651 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
5653 @c ================================================== lr.type
5656 @findex %define lr.type
5659 @item Language(s): all
5661 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5662 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5663 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5665 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5667 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5671 @c ================================================== namespace
5673 @findex %define namespace
5674 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5678 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5680 @findex %define parse.assert
5683 @item Languages(s): C++
5685 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5686 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5688 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5690 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5692 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5697 @c ================================================== parse.error
5699 @findex %define parse.error
5704 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5705 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5707 @item Accepted Values:
5710 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5712 @item @code{verbose}
5713 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5714 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5718 @item Default Value:
5724 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5726 @findex %define parse.lac
5729 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5731 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5732 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5733 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5734 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5738 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5740 @findex %define parse.trace
5743 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
5745 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5746 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5748 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
5749 @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
5750 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
5751 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5754 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5756 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5760 @c ================================================== variant
5762 @findex %define variant
5769 Request variant-based semantic values.
5770 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5772 @item Accepted Values:
5775 @item Default Value:
5783 @subsection %code Summary
5787 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5788 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5789 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5790 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5791 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5792 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5793 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5794 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5796 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5797 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5798 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5799 in the parser implementation.
5801 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5802 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5803 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5805 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5808 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5809 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5810 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5811 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5812 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5813 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5817 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5818 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5819 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5822 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5823 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5827 @findex %code requires
5830 @item Language(s): C, C++
5832 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5833 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5834 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5835 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5836 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5838 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5839 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5844 @findex %code provides
5847 @item Language(s): C, C++
5849 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5850 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5852 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5853 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5861 @item Language(s): C, C++
5863 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5864 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5865 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5866 parser implementation file. For example:
5875 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5879 @findex %code imports
5882 @item Language(s): Java
5884 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5886 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5887 before any class definitions.
5891 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5892 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5893 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5894 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5897 @node Multiple Parsers
5898 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5900 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5901 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5902 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5903 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5904 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5905 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5906 exported in the generated header.
5908 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5909 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5910 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5911 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5912 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5913 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5914 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5915 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5916 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5918 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5919 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5920 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5921 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5922 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5923 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5924 specifically --- more about this below.
5926 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5927 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5930 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5931 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5932 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5933 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5936 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5937 #define yyparse cparse
5938 #define yylval clval
5944 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5945 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5946 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5948 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5952 extern CSTYPE clval;
5956 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5957 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5958 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5961 /* Enabling traces. */
5963 # if defined YYDEBUG
5980 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5981 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5982 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5985 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5986 @cindex C-language interface
5989 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5990 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5991 functions that it needs to use.
5993 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5994 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5995 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5996 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5999 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6000 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6001 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6002 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6003 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6004 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6006 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6007 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6008 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6012 @node Parser Function
6013 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6016 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6017 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6018 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6019 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6020 without reading further.
6023 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6024 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6025 is due to end-of-input).
6027 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6028 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6031 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6034 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6039 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6044 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6047 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6048 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6049 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6051 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6052 @findex %parse-param
6053 Declare that one or more
6054 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6055 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6056 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6057 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6060 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6063 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6067 Then call the parser like this:
6071 int nastiness, randomness;
6072 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6073 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6079 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6082 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6085 @node Push Parser Function
6086 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6087 @findex yypush_parse
6089 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6090 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6092 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6093 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6094 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6095 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6097 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6098 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6099 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6100 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6103 @node Pull Parser Function
6104 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6105 @findex yypull_parse
6107 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6108 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6110 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6111 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6112 declaration is used.
6113 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6115 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6116 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6119 @node Parser Create Function
6120 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6121 @findex yypstate_new
6123 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6124 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6126 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6127 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6128 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6129 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6131 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6132 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6133 or 0 if no memory was available.
6134 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6138 @node Parser Delete Function
6139 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6140 @findex yypstate_delete
6142 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6143 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6145 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6146 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6147 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6148 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6150 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
6151 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6152 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6156 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6158 @cindex lexical analyzer
6160 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6161 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6162 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6163 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6165 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6166 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6167 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6168 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6169 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6170 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6171 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6175 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6176 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6177 of the token it has read.
6178 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6179 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6181 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6182 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6185 @node Calling Convention
6186 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6188 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6189 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6190 signifies end-of-input.
6192 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6193 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6194 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6195 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6197 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6198 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6199 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6200 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6201 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6202 signifies end-of-input.
6204 Here is an example showing these things:
6211 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6214 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6215 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6217 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6223 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6224 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6226 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6227 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6231 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6232 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6233 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6234 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6237 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6238 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6239 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6240 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6241 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6244 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6245 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6246 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6247 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6250 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6253 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6254 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6255 strlen (token_buffer))
6256 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6257 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6262 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6263 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6267 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6270 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6271 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6272 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6273 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6279 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6280 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6285 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6286 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6287 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6288 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6289 declaration looks like this:
6302 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6307 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6308 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6313 @node Token Locations
6314 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6317 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6318 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6319 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6320 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6321 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6322 data in that variable.
6324 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6325 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6326 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6327 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6328 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6331 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6334 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6336 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6337 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6338 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6339 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6340 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6341 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6346 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6349 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6350 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6355 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6356 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6357 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6360 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6361 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6362 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6363 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6365 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6367 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6368 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6369 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6372 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6374 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6375 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6376 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6377 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6378 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6384 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6385 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6386 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6390 results in the following signatures:
6393 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6394 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6397 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6400 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6401 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6405 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6408 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6409 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6410 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6413 @node Error Reporting
6414 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6415 @cindex error reporting function
6418 @cindex syntax error
6420 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6421 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6422 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6423 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6426 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6427 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6428 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6429 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6430 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6432 @findex %define parse.error
6433 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6434 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6435 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6436 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6437 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6439 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6440 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6441 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6442 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6443 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6444 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6446 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6447 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6448 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6450 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6455 yyerror (char const *s)
6459 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6464 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6465 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6466 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6467 immediately return 1.
6469 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6470 an access to the current location.
6471 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6472 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6473 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6477 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6478 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6481 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6484 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6485 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6488 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6489 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6490 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6491 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6495 /* Location tracking. */
6499 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6501 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6502 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6506 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6509 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6510 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6511 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6512 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6517 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6518 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6519 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6520 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6521 message is always passed last.
6523 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6524 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6525 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6529 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6530 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6531 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6532 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6534 @node Action Features
6535 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6536 @cindex summary, action features
6537 @cindex action features summary
6539 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6540 are useful in actions.
6542 @deffn {Variable} $$
6543 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6544 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6547 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6548 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6549 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6552 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6553 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6554 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6555 Types of Values in Actions}.
6558 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6559 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6560 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6561 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6564 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6565 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6566 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6569 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6570 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6571 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6574 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6576 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6577 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6578 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6579 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6580 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6581 going to be reduced by this rule.
6583 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6584 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6585 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6588 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6591 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6592 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6595 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6596 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6600 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6601 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6602 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6603 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6604 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6605 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6608 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6609 @findex YYRECOVERING
6610 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6611 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6612 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6615 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6616 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6617 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6618 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6619 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6621 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6624 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6625 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6627 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6629 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6632 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6633 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6634 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6635 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6638 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6639 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6640 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6641 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6643 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6646 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6647 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6648 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6649 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6651 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6656 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6657 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6660 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6664 @c int first_line, last_line;
6665 @c int first_column, last_column;
6669 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6670 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6672 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6673 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6674 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6677 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6680 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6682 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6683 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6687 @node Internationalization
6688 @section Parser Internationalization
6689 @cindex internationalization
6695 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6696 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6697 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6698 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6699 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6700 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6701 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6702 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6705 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6706 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6707 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6712 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6713 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6714 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6715 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6716 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6720 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6725 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6726 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6727 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6728 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6729 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6730 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6731 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6732 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6733 Bison-generated parser.
6736 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6737 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6738 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6742 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6745 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6746 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6747 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6751 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6752 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6753 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6756 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6762 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6766 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6772 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6773 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6774 @cindex algorithm of parser
6777 @cindex parser stack
6778 @cindex stack, parser
6780 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6781 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6782 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6784 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6785 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6788 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6789 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6790 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6791 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6792 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6793 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6794 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6796 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6803 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6804 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6807 expr: expr '*' expr;
6811 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6818 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6819 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6821 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6822 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6823 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6825 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6828 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6829 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6830 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6831 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6832 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6833 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6834 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6835 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6836 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6837 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6841 @section Lookahead Tokens
6842 @cindex lookahead token
6844 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6845 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6846 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6847 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6848 token in order to decide what to do.
6850 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6851 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6852 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6853 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6854 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6855 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6856 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6859 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6860 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6861 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6880 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6881 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6882 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6883 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6884 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6886 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6887 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6888 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6889 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6890 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6891 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6896 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6897 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6898 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6899 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6902 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6904 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6905 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6906 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6908 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6909 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6915 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6921 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6922 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6924 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6925 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6926 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6927 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6930 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6931 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6932 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6933 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6934 contrast it with the other alternative.
6936 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6937 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6941 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6943 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6946 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6947 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6948 making these two inputs equivalent:
6951 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6953 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6956 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6957 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6958 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6959 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6960 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6961 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6962 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6963 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6965 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6966 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6967 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6968 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6970 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6972 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6973 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6974 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6979 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6992 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
7002 @section Operator Precedence
7003 @cindex operator precedence
7004 @cindex precedence of operators
7006 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7007 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7008 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7009 shift and when to reduce.
7012 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7013 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7014 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7015 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7016 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7019 @node Why Precedence
7020 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7022 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7023 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7038 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7039 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7040 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7041 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7042 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7043 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7044 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7047 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7048 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7049 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7050 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7051 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7052 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7053 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7054 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7057 @cindex associativity
7058 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7059 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7060 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7061 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7062 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7063 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7064 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7065 makes right-associativity.
7067 @node Using Precedence
7068 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7074 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7075 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7076 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7077 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7078 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7079 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7080 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7082 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7083 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7084 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7085 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7086 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7087 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7088 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7089 what expected the grammar author.
7091 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7092 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7093 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7094 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7095 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7097 @node Precedence Only
7098 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7101 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7102 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7103 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7104 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7105 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7106 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7107 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7109 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7110 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7111 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7115 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7118 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7119 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7120 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7121 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7122 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7123 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7124 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7131 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7132 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7133 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7134 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7135 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7136 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7137 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7139 @node Precedence Examples
7140 @subsection Precedence Examples
7142 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7150 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7151 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7152 declared with @code{'-'}:
7155 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
7161 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
7162 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
7163 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
7165 @node How Precedence
7166 @subsection How Precedence Works
7168 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7169 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7170 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7171 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7172 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7173 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7175 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7176 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7177 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7178 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7179 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7180 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7181 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7184 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7185 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7187 @node Contextual Precedence
7188 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7189 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7190 @cindex unary operator precedence
7191 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7192 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7195 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7196 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7197 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7198 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7200 The Bison precedence declarations
7201 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7202 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7203 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7206 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7207 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7208 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7209 modifier's syntax is:
7212 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7216 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7217 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7218 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7219 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7220 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7222 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7223 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7224 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7234 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7242 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7247 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7248 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7249 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7250 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7252 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7253 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7254 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7255 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7257 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7258 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7259 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7260 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7261 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7262 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7264 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7265 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7269 @section Parser States
7270 @cindex finite-state machine
7271 @cindex parser state
7272 @cindex state (of parser)
7274 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7275 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7276 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7277 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7278 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7280 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7281 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7282 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7283 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7284 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7285 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7286 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7287 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7290 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7291 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7292 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7295 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7296 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7297 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7299 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7300 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7303 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7304 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7309 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7311 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7317 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7318 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7324 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7325 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7326 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7327 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7328 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7329 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7331 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7332 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7333 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7335 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7336 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7337 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7338 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7339 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7341 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7342 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7343 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7344 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7348 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7349 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7353 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7359 | sequence redirects
7369 | redirects redirect
7374 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7375 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7376 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7377 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7378 in infinitely many ways!
7380 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7381 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7382 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7383 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7385 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7396 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7404 | sequence redirects
7418 | redirects redirect
7423 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7424 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7425 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7427 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7435 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7438 | name_list ':' type
7454 | name ',' name_list
7459 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7460 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7461 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7462 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7466 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7468 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7469 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7470 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7472 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7473 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7474 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7475 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7476 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7477 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7478 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7481 @cindex canonical LR
7482 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7483 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7484 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7485 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7486 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7487 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7488 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7489 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7491 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7492 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7493 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7494 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7495 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7506 | ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
7511 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7512 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7513 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7514 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7515 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7516 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7518 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7519 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7520 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7521 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7522 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7523 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7528 | name_list ':' type
7536 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7537 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7542 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7543 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7544 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7545 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7546 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7547 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7548 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7550 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7551 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7552 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7553 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7555 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7556 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7559 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7560 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7561 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7562 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7565 @node LR Table Construction
7566 @subsection LR Table Construction
7567 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7570 @cindex canonical LR
7571 @findex %define lr.type
7573 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7574 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7575 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7576 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7579 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7580 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7581 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7582 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7585 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7586 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7587 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7590 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7591 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7592 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7595 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7597 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7600 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7604 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7608 %define lr.type ielr
7611 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7612 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7613 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7614 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7615 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7616 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7617 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7618 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7619 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7620 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7622 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7623 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7624 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7625 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7631 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7634 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7636 @cindex GLR with LALR
7637 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7638 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7639 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7640 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7641 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7642 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7643 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7644 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7645 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7646 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7648 @item Malformed grammars.
7650 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7651 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7652 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7653 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7654 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7659 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7660 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7661 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7662 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7663 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7664 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7665 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7666 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7667 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7671 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7674 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7675 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7676 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7677 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7678 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7679 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7680 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7681 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7682 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7683 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7684 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7685 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7688 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7689 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7690 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7692 @node Default Reductions
7693 @subsection Default Reductions
7694 @cindex default reductions
7695 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
7698 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7699 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7700 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7701 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7702 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7704 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7705 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7708 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7710 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7711 @cindex consistent states
7712 @cindex defaulted states
7713 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7714 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7715 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7716 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7717 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7718 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7719 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7720 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7721 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7722 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7723 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7725 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7726 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7727 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7728 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7729 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7730 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7731 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7732 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7733 should already be considered closed.
7735 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7737 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7738 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7739 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7740 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7741 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7742 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7743 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7744 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7745 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7749 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7750 @c sentence from being rejected.
7751 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7752 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7753 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7754 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7755 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7756 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7759 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7760 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7761 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7762 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7763 because the accept action ends the parse.
7765 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7766 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7767 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7768 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7769 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7770 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7771 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7772 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7773 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7774 split the parse instead.
7776 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7777 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
7779 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction @var{WHERE}}
7780 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7781 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7783 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7784 @item @code{consistent}
7785 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7788 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7789 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7794 @findex %define parse.lac
7796 @cindex lookahead correction
7798 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7799 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7800 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7801 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7802 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7803 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7804 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7805 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7806 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7808 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7809 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7810 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7811 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7812 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7814 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7815 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7816 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7817 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7819 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7820 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7822 @item @code{none} (default)
7825 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7826 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7830 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7831 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7832 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7833 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7834 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7835 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7836 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7837 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7838 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7839 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7842 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7843 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7844 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7845 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7846 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7847 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7848 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7849 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7850 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7851 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7853 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7854 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7855 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7856 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7857 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7858 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7859 language-recognition power.
7861 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7864 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7866 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7867 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7868 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7869 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7872 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7874 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7875 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7876 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7877 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7878 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7879 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7883 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7884 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7885 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7886 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7887 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7888 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7889 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7890 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7891 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7892 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7893 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7896 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7897 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7898 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7900 @node Unreachable States
7901 @subsection Unreachable States
7902 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
7903 @cindex unreachable states
7905 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7906 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7907 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7908 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7910 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7911 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7912 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7913 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7915 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state @var{VALUE}}
7916 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7917 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7920 There are a few caveats to consider:
7923 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7925 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7926 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7927 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7928 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7929 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7930 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7932 @item Other useless states.
7934 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7935 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7936 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7937 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7938 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7939 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7940 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7943 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7944 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7946 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7947 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7948 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7950 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7951 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7952 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7953 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7954 context-free languages.
7955 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7956 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7957 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7958 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7959 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7960 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7961 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7962 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7964 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7965 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7966 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7967 parser uses the same basic
7968 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7969 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7970 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7971 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7973 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7974 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7975 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7976 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7977 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7979 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7980 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7981 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7982 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7983 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7984 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7985 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7986 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7987 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7988 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7989 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7992 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7993 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7994 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7995 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7996 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7997 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7998 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7999 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8000 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8001 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8002 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8003 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8005 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8006 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8007 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8009 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8010 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8011 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8012 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8013 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8014 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8015 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8016 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8017 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8018 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8019 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8020 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8022 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8025 @node Memory Management
8026 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8027 @cindex memory exhaustion
8028 @cindex memory management
8029 @cindex stack overflow
8030 @cindex parser stack overflow
8031 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8033 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8034 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8035 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8037 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8038 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8039 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8042 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8043 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8044 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8045 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8047 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8048 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8049 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8050 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8051 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8052 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8054 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8055 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8056 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8059 @cindex default stack limit
8060 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8064 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8065 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8066 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8067 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8068 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8070 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8072 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8073 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8074 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8075 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8076 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8077 non-trivial copy constructors.
8078 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8081 @node Error Recovery
8082 @chapter Error Recovery
8083 @cindex error recovery
8084 @cindex recovery from errors
8086 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8087 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8088 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8091 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8092 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8093 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8094 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8095 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8096 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8097 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8100 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8101 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8102 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8103 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8104 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8105 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8117 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8118 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8120 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8121 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8122 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8123 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8124 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8125 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8126 applicable in the ordinary way.
8128 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8129 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8130 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8131 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8132 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8133 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8134 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8135 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8136 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8137 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8138 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8139 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8141 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8142 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8143 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8146 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8149 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8150 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8151 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8152 spurious error message:
8162 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8163 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8164 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8165 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8166 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8167 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8168 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8171 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8172 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8173 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8174 error messages resume.
8176 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8177 as any other rules can.
8180 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8181 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8182 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8183 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8186 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8187 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8188 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8190 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8192 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8193 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8194 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8195 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8196 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8198 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8199 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8200 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8201 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8204 @node Context Dependency
8205 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8207 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8208 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8209 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8210 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8214 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8215 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8216 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8217 error recovery rules must be written.
8220 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8221 neither clean nor robust.)
8223 @node Semantic Tokens
8224 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8226 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8227 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8233 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8234 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8235 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8237 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8238 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8239 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8240 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8241 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8243 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8244 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8245 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8246 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8247 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8248 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8249 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8251 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8252 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8253 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8254 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8258 typedef int foo, bar;
8262 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8263 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8269 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8270 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8272 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8273 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8274 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8275 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8276 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8281 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8282 | declarator maybeasm
8288 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8289 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8295 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8296 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8297 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8299 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8300 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8301 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8302 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8303 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8304 the syntactic context.
8306 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8307 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8308 @cindex lexical tie-in
8310 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8311 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8314 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8315 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8316 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8317 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8318 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8325 void yyerror (char const *);
8334 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8335 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8336 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8350 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8351 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8352 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8354 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8355 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8356 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8359 @node Tie-in Recovery
8360 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8362 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8363 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8365 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8366 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8367 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8368 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8373 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8375 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8379 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8380 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8381 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8382 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8383 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8385 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8387 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8388 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8389 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8395 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8401 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8402 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8403 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8404 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8406 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8407 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8408 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8409 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8410 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8411 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8414 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8417 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8419 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8420 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8421 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8422 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8425 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8426 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8427 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8431 @section Understanding Your Parser
8433 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8434 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8435 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8436 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8437 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8439 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8440 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8441 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8442 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8443 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8444 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8445 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8447 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8465 @command{bison} reports:
8468 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8469 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8470 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8471 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8472 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8475 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8476 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8477 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8478 interpretation is the same.
8481 @cindex token, useless
8482 @cindex useless token
8483 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8484 @cindex useless nonterminal
8485 @cindex rule, useless
8486 @cindex useless rule
8487 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8488 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8489 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8490 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8493 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8496 Terminals unused in grammar
8499 Rules useless in grammar
8504 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8507 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8508 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8509 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8510 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8514 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8529 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8533 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8546 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8551 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8557 @cindex pointed rule
8558 @cindex rule, pointed
8559 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8560 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8561 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8562 the location of the input cursor.
8567 0 $accept: . exp $end
8569 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8574 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8575 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8576 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8577 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8578 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8579 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8580 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8581 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8583 @cindex core, item set
8584 @cindex item set core
8585 @cindex kernel, item set
8586 @cindex item set core
8587 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8588 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8589 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8590 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8591 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8592 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8597 0 $accept: . exp $end
8598 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8604 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8610 In the state 1@dots{}
8617 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8621 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8622 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8623 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8624 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8629 0 $accept: exp . $end
8630 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8635 $end shift, and go to state 3
8636 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8637 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8638 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8639 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8643 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8644 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8645 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8646 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8647 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8650 @cindex accepting state
8651 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8657 0 $accept: exp $end .
8663 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8664 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8666 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8672 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8674 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8681 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8683 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8690 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8692 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8699 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8701 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8706 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8712 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8718 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8719 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8721 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8722 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8725 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8726 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8727 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8728 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8729 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8730 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8731 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8732 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8734 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8735 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8736 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8739 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8740 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8741 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8742 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8743 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8744 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8745 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8746 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8747 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8748 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8749 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8750 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8755 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8756 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8761 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8762 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8764 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8765 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8768 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8769 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8770 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8771 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8772 conflicts in the report:
8775 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8776 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8777 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8781 The remaining states are similar:
8787 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8793 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8794 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8796 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8797 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8803 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8809 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8811 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8812 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8818 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8824 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8825 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8826 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8827 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8829 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8830 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8831 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8832 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8833 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8838 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8839 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8840 @samp{*}, but also because the
8841 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8843 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
8846 @section Visualizing Your Parser
8849 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
8850 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
8851 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
8852 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
8853 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
8854 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
8855 to help them understand LR parsers.
8857 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified (see
8858 @pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
8859 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
8860 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
8861 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}.
8863 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8874 The graphical output is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is
8875 easier understood by making direct comparisons between them. See
8876 @ref{Debugging, , Debugging Your Parser} for a detailled analysis of the
8879 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
8881 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
8882 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
8883 about transitions, for examples
8885 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
8886 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
8887 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
8892 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
8895 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
8897 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
8898 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
8906 ";" shift, and go to state 6
8910 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8912 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
8914 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
8916 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
8917 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
8918 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
8919 action for the given state, there is no such label.
8921 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
8928 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
8929 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
8932 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8934 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
8936 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
8937 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
8938 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
8939 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
8940 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
8942 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation state. It
8943 is shown as a blue diamond, labelled "Acc".
8945 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
8947 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
8948 the name of the rule being jumped to.
8950 @c ================================================= Tracing
8953 @section Tracing Your Parser
8956 @cindex tracing the parser
8958 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8959 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8962 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8963 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8964 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8967 @node Enabling Traces
8968 @subsection Enabling Traces
8969 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8972 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8974 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8975 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8976 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8977 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8980 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
8981 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
8982 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
8983 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
8984 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
8986 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
8987 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
8988 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8989 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
8990 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
8992 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8994 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8995 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
8996 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
8998 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
8999 @findex %define parse.trace
9000 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9001 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9002 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9003 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9004 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9007 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9011 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9012 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9013 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9014 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9015 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9016 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9018 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9019 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9020 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9021 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9023 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9024 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9025 messages tell you these things:
9029 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9032 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9033 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9036 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9037 of the state stack afterward.
9040 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9041 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9042 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9043 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9044 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9045 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9046 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9047 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9048 grammar are to blame.
9050 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9051 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9052 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9053 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9054 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9057 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9059 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9060 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9061 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9062 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9063 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9064 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9066 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9067 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9068 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9071 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9073 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9075 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9078 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9079 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9080 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9081 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
9084 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9085 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9086 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9087 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9088 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9089 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9091 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9092 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9093 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9094 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
9095 printer will be used for them.
9097 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9098 are sent onto standard error.
9101 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9104 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9105 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9111 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9112 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9113 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9114 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9116 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9118 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9119 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9124 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9125 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9126 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9130 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9131 Shifting token '(' ()
9133 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9134 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9136 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9137 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9138 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9144 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9145 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
9146 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9149 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9150 Shifting token '-' ()
9152 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9153 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9155 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9156 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9157 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9158 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9160 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9161 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9162 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9164 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9165 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9171 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9172 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9175 Next token is token ')' ()
9176 Shifting token ')' ()
9178 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9179 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9181 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9183 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9189 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9193 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9194 Shifting token '\n' ()
9196 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9197 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9200 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9203 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9206 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9211 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9212 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9213 completion of the parsing.
9216 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9217 Shifting token $end ()
9220 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9221 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9225 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9226 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9229 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9230 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9231 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9233 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9235 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9236 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9237 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9239 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9242 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9243 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9247 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9248 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9249 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9252 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9255 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9258 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9259 else if (type == NUM)
9260 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9264 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9267 @chapter Invoking Bison
9268 @cindex invoking Bison
9269 @cindex Bison invocation
9270 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9272 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9278 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9279 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9280 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9281 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9282 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9283 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9284 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9285 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9286 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9287 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9288 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9293 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9296 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9299 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9302 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9304 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9305 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9306 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9309 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9310 in alphabetical order by short options.
9311 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9312 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9316 @section Bison Options
9318 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9319 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9320 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9321 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9322 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9325 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9326 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9329 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9335 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9339 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9341 @item --print-localedir
9342 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9344 @item --print-datadir
9345 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9349 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9350 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9351 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9352 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9353 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9354 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9355 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9356 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9357 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9358 for compatibility with POSIX:
9365 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9366 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9367 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9368 this option is specified.
9370 @item -W [@var{category}]
9371 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9372 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9375 @item midrule-values
9376 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9378 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9381 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9384 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9385 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9388 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9391 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9392 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9393 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9396 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9400 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9401 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9402 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9403 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9404 no effect on the conflict report.
9407 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9411 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9413 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9414 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9420 Turn off all the warnings.
9422 See @option{-Werror}, below.
9425 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9426 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9427 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9429 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
9430 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
9431 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
9432 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
9434 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
9435 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
9437 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
9438 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
9441 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
9442 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
9443 S/R conflicts as errors.
9446 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
9447 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
9457 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9458 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9459 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9461 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9462 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9463 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9464 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9465 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9466 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9467 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9471 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9474 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9475 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9476 definition for @var{name}.
9478 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9479 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9480 definitions for @var{name}.
9482 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9483 definitions for @var{name}.
9486 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9487 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9488 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9490 @item -L @var{language}
9491 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9492 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9493 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9494 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9495 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9497 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9501 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9503 @item -p @var{prefix}
9504 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9505 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9506 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9507 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9511 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9512 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9513 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9514 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9515 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9516 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9519 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9520 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9521 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9523 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9524 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9525 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9526 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9528 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9529 file in the Bison installation directory.
9530 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9531 current working directory.
9532 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9535 @itemx --token-table
9536 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9543 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9544 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9545 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9546 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9549 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9550 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9551 with other short options.
9553 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9554 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9555 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9556 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9558 @item -r @var{things}
9559 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9560 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9561 separated list of @var{things} among:
9565 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9569 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9570 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9573 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9574 each rule's lookahead set.
9577 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9578 precedence and associativity directives.
9581 Enable all the items.
9584 Do not generate the report.
9587 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9588 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9592 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9593 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9594 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9597 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9598 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9600 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9601 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9603 @item -g [@var{file}]
9604 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9605 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9606 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9607 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9608 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9609 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9612 @item -x [@var{file}]
9613 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9614 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9615 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9616 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9618 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9619 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9622 @node Option Cross Key
9623 @section Option Cross Key
9625 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9626 the corresponding short option and directive.
9628 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9629 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9630 @include cross-options.texi
9634 @section Yacc Library
9636 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9637 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9638 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9639 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9640 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9641 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9642 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9644 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9645 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9648 int yyerror (char const *);
9651 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9652 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9653 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9659 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9661 @node Other Languages
9662 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9665 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9666 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9670 @section C++ Parsers
9673 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9674 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9675 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9676 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9677 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9678 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9681 @node C++ Bison Interface
9682 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9683 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9687 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9688 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9689 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9690 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9692 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9694 @findex %define api.namespace
9695 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
9696 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
9697 in the following files:
9702 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9703 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
9704 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
9708 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9711 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9712 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9713 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9714 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9715 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9717 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9718 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9719 @samp{%defines} directive.
9722 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9723 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9725 @node C++ Semantic Values
9726 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9727 @c - No objects in unions
9729 @c - Printer and destructor
9731 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
9732 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
9733 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
9734 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
9737 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
9738 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
9742 @subsubsection C++ Unions
9744 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9745 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9746 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9749 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9750 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9751 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9753 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9754 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9755 to such objects are allowed.
9758 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9759 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9760 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9764 @subsubsection C++ Variants
9766 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
9767 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
9768 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
9769 types can be used without pointers.
9771 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
9772 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
9773 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
9774 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
9776 For instance, instead of
9784 %token <ival> NUMBER;
9785 %token <sval> STRING;
9792 %token <int> NUMBER;
9793 %token <std::string> STRING;
9796 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
9797 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
9800 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
9801 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
9802 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
9804 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
9805 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
9806 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
9807 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
9808 eventually, destroyed.
9810 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
9811 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
9812 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
9815 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
9816 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
9820 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
9821 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
9822 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
9823 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
9824 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
9825 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
9826 that would be duplicating the information.
9828 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
9829 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
9830 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
9831 (the current implementation of) variants:
9834 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
9835 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
9836 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
9837 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
9838 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
9839 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
9842 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
9843 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
9844 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
9845 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
9846 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
9847 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
9850 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
9853 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
9854 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
9856 @node C++ Location Values
9857 @subsection C++ Location Values
9861 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9863 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9864 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
9866 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
9867 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9868 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
9869 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
9870 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
9873 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9874 genuine code only the latter is used.
9877 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9878 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9879 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
9883 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9885 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9886 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9887 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9891 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9892 Reset the position to the given values.
9895 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9896 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9897 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9898 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9899 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9902 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9903 The line, starting at 1.
9906 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9907 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9910 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9911 The column, starting at 1.
9914 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9915 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9918 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9919 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9920 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9921 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9922 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9925 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9926 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9927 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9930 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9931 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9932 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9933 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9937 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9939 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9940 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9943 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9944 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9945 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9948 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9949 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9952 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9953 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9954 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9957 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9958 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9959 Advance the @code{end} position.
9962 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9963 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9964 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9965 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9968 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9969 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9972 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9973 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9974 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9978 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9979 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9980 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9983 @node User Defined Location Type
9984 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
9985 @findex %define api.location.type
9987 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
9988 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
9991 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
9994 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
9997 it must be copyable;
10000 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10001 parser basically runs
10003 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10004 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10007 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10010 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10011 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10014 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10015 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10020 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10021 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10022 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10023 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10028 %define namespace "master::"
10032 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10033 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10036 %define api.location.type "master::location"
10037 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10040 @node C++ Parser Interface
10041 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10042 @c - define parser_class_name
10044 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10046 @c - Reporting errors
10048 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10049 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10050 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10051 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
10052 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10053 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10054 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10055 additional argument for its constructor.
10057 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10058 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10059 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10062 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10063 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10064 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10065 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10066 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10067 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10070 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10071 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10072 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10073 equivalent with first
10074 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10075 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10076 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10077 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10078 function invoked from the user action.
10081 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10082 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10083 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10086 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10087 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10088 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10091 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10092 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10095 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10096 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10097 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10100 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10101 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10102 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10106 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10107 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10108 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10109 or nonzero, full tracing.
10112 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10113 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10114 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10115 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10116 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10121 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10122 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10123 @c - prefix for yylex.
10124 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10127 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10128 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10129 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10130 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10133 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10134 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10137 @node Split Symbols
10138 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10140 Therefore the interface is as follows.
10142 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10143 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10144 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10145 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10146 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10149 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10150 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10152 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10156 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10157 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10160 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10161 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10165 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10166 initialized. So the code would look like:
10170 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10171 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10174 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10175 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10184 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10185 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10188 yylval.build(yytext);
10189 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10194 @node Complete Symbols
10195 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10197 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and @code{%define lex_symbol},
10198 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10199 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10200 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10201 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10203 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10204 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10205 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10206 the @var{location}.
10209 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10210 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10211 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10212 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10214 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10216 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10217 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10218 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10219 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10220 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10221 also pass the @var{location}.
10224 For instance, given the following declarations:
10227 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10228 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10229 %token <int> INTEGER;
10234 Bison generates the following functions:
10237 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10238 const location_type& l);
10239 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10240 const location_type& loc);
10241 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10245 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10248 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10249 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10250 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10253 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10254 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10256 @node A Complete C++ Example
10257 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10259 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10260 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10261 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10262 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10263 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10264 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10265 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10266 actually easier to interface with.
10269 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10270 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10271 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10272 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10273 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10276 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10277 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10279 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10280 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10281 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10282 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10283 of valid input follows.
10287 seven := one + two * three
10291 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10292 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10294 @c - A place to store error messages
10295 @c - A place for the result
10297 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10298 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10299 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10300 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10301 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10302 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10303 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10305 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10306 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10307 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10310 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10312 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10313 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10316 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10321 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10322 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10323 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10324 factor both as follows.
10326 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10328 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10330 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
10331 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10336 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10339 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10341 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10342 class calcxx_driver
10346 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10348 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10354 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10355 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10357 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10359 // Handling the scanner.
10360 void scan_begin ();
10362 bool trace_scanning;
10366 Similarly for the parser itself.
10368 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10370 // Run the parser on file F.
10371 // Return 0 on success.
10372 int parse (const std::string& f);
10373 // The name of the file being parsed.
10374 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10376 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10377 bool trace_parsing;
10381 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10382 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10383 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10384 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10386 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10389 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10390 void error (const std::string& m);
10392 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10395 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10396 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10397 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10398 messages and set error state.
10400 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10402 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10403 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10405 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10406 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10408 variables["one"] = 1;
10409 variables["two"] = 2;
10412 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10417 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10421 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10422 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10423 int res = parser.parse ();
10429 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10431 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10435 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10437 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10441 @node Calc++ Parser
10442 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10444 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10445 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10446 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10447 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10450 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10452 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10453 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10455 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10459 @findex %define variant
10460 @findex %define lex_symbol
10461 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
10462 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
10463 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
10464 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{lex_symbol}.
10466 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10469 %define parse.assert
10474 @findex %code requires
10475 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
10476 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
10477 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
10478 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
10479 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10480 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
10481 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
10483 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10488 class calcxx_driver;
10493 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10494 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10497 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10499 // The parsing context.
10500 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10504 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
10505 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10506 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10509 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10514 // Initialize the initial location.
10515 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10520 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10521 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10524 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10526 %define parse.trace
10527 %define parse.error verbose
10532 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10533 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10535 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10539 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10545 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10546 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
10547 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
10548 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
10549 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
10551 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10553 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10555 END 0 "end of file"
10567 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
10568 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
10571 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10573 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10574 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
10579 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
10580 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
10581 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
10582 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
10584 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10586 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
10590 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
10591 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
10593 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10597 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10600 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10601 | assignments assignment @{@};
10604 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
10609 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10610 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10611 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10612 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10613 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
10614 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
10615 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
10620 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10623 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10626 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
10627 const std::string& m)
10629 driver.error (l, m);
10633 @node Calc++ Scanner
10634 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10636 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10637 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10639 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10641 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10643 # include <climits>
10644 # include <cstdlib>
10646 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10647 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10649 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10650 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10651 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10652 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
10654 # define yywrap() 1
10656 // The location of the current token.
10657 static yy::location loc;
10662 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10663 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10664 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10665 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
10667 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10669 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10673 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10675 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10677 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10683 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10684 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10685 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
10686 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
10687 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10688 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10689 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10691 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10695 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
10696 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
10702 // Code run each time yylex is called.
10706 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
10707 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
10711 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
10713 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10715 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
10716 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
10717 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
10718 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
10719 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
10720 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
10721 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
10726 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10727 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10728 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
10729 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
10732 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10733 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
10734 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
10739 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
10740 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10742 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10746 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10748 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10749 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10751 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10753 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10754 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10761 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10768 @node Calc++ Top Level
10769 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10771 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10773 @comment file: calc++.cc
10775 #include <iostream>
10776 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10780 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10783 calcxx_driver driver;
10784 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10785 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10786 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10787 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10788 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10789 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10790 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10799 @section Java Parsers
10802 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10803 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10804 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10805 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10806 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10807 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10808 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10809 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10812 @node Java Bison Interface
10813 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10814 @c - %language "Java"
10816 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10817 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10819 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10820 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10822 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10823 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10824 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10825 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10826 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10827 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10828 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10829 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10830 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10831 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10833 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10835 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10836 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10837 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10838 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10841 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10842 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10844 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10845 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10847 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10848 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10850 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10851 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
10852 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
10854 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10855 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10856 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
10858 if needed. Also, in the future the
10859 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10860 access the token names and codes.
10862 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
10863 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
10864 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
10865 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
10868 @node Java Semantic Values
10869 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10870 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10872 @c - Printer and destructor
10874 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10875 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10876 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10879 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10880 %type <Integer> number
10883 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10884 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10885 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10886 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
10887 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10890 %define stype "ASTNode"
10894 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10895 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10897 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10898 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10899 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10900 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10901 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10902 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10904 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10905 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10906 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10908 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10909 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10910 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10913 @node Java Location Values
10914 @subsection Java Location Values
10916 @c - class Position
10917 @c - class Location
10919 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10920 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10921 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10922 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10923 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10924 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10925 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
10927 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10928 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10929 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10930 be supplied by the user.
10933 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10934 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10935 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10938 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10939 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10942 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10943 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10946 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10947 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10948 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10949 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10953 @node Java Parser Interface
10954 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10955 @c - define parser_class_name
10957 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10959 @c - Reporting errors
10961 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10962 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10963 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10964 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10965 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10967 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10968 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10969 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10970 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10971 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10972 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10973 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
10974 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
10976 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10977 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10978 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10979 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
10981 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10982 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10983 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10984 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10985 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10986 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10988 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10989 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10990 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10991 which initialize them automatically.
10993 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10994 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10995 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
10996 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
10998 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10999 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11000 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11003 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11004 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11005 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11008 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11009 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11010 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11012 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11013 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11014 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11017 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11018 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11019 @code{false} otherwise.
11022 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11023 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11024 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11025 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11026 verbose error messages.
11029 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11030 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11031 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11032 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11033 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11034 available only if location tracking is active.
11037 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11038 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11039 from a syntax error.
11040 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11043 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11044 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11045 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11049 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11050 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11051 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11052 or nonzero, full tracing.
11055 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11056 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11057 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11061 @node Java Scanner Interface
11062 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11065 @c - Lexer interface
11067 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11068 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11069 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11070 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11071 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11074 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11075 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11076 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11077 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11080 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11081 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11082 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11083 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11086 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11088 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11089 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11090 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11091 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
11094 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11095 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11096 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11099 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11100 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11103 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11104 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11105 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11106 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11107 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11109 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11110 "@var{class-name}".}
11113 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11114 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11116 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
11117 "@var{class-name}".}
11121 @node Java Action Features
11122 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11124 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11125 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11127 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11128 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11131 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11132 This may not be assigned to.
11133 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11136 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11137 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11138 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11142 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11143 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11144 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11145 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11146 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11147 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11150 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11151 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11152 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11153 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11155 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11159 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11160 This may not be assigned to.
11161 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11165 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11166 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11169 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11170 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11171 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11174 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11175 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11176 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11179 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11180 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11181 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11184 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11185 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11186 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11188 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11191 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11192 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11193 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11194 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11195 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11196 available only if location tracking is active.
11200 @node Java Differences
11201 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11203 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11204 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11205 section summarizes these differences.
11209 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11210 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11211 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11212 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11213 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11214 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11215 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11217 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11218 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11219 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11220 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11221 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11224 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11225 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11226 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11227 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11228 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11229 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11230 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11231 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11232 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11235 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11237 @item @code{%code imports}
11238 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11239 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11240 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11242 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11243 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11245 @item @code{%code lexer}
11246 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11247 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11248 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11252 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11253 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11254 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11256 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11257 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11262 @node Java Declarations Summary
11263 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11265 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11266 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11268 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11269 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11272 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11273 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11274 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11275 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11276 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11279 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11280 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11281 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11282 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11285 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11286 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11287 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11288 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11291 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11292 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11293 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11296 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11297 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11298 a Java @emph{type}.
11299 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11302 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11303 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11304 @xref{Java Differences}.
11307 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11308 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11309 @xref{Java Differences}.
11312 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11313 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
11314 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11317 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11318 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11319 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11322 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11323 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11324 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11325 @xref{Java Differences}.
11328 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11329 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
11330 @xref{Java Differences}.
11333 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11334 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11335 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11338 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
11339 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
11340 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11343 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11344 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11345 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11348 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11349 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11350 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11353 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11354 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11356 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11359 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11360 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11361 constructor. Default is none.
11362 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11365 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11366 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11367 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11368 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11371 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
11372 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11373 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11374 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11375 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
11376 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11379 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11380 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11381 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11384 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11385 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11386 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11387 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11390 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
11391 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11392 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11393 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
11394 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11397 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11398 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11399 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11402 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
11403 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11404 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11407 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11408 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11409 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11412 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11413 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11414 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11415 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11419 @c ================================================= FAQ
11422 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11423 @cindex frequently asked questions
11426 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11430 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11431 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11432 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11433 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11434 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11435 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11436 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11437 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11438 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11439 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11440 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11441 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11444 @node Memory Exhausted
11445 @section Memory Exhausted
11448 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11449 message. What can I do?
11452 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11455 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11456 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11458 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11459 following typical questions:
11462 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11463 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11464 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11471 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11472 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11473 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
11476 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11477 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11478 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11479 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11480 @file{first-line.l}:
11486 #include <stdlib.h>
11490 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11494 yyparse (char const *file)
11496 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11500 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11504 /* One token only. */
11506 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11509 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11527 If the file @file{input} contains
11535 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11538 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11539 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11540 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11545 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11546 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11547 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11548 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11549 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11550 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11551 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11552 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11555 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11556 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11557 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11558 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11560 @node Strings are Destroyed
11561 @section Strings are Destroyed
11564 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11565 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11566 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11569 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11570 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11571 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11577 char *yylval = NULL;
11582 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11590 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11591 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11592 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11593 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11599 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11602 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11603 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11604 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11610 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11611 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11612 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11613 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11614 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11615 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11618 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11619 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11620 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11625 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11626 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11629 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11630 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11633 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11634 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11635 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11636 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11637 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11638 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11639 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11641 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11643 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11644 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11645 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11646 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11647 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11648 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11651 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11652 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11655 @node Multiple start-symbols
11656 @section Multiple start-symbols
11659 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11660 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11661 multiple entry points.
11664 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11665 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11666 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11667 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11671 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11678 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11679 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11681 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11682 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11683 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11684 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11685 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11686 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11687 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11688 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11691 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11696 int t = start_token;
11701 /* @r{The rules.} */
11705 @node Secure? Conform?
11706 @section Secure? Conform?
11709 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11712 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11713 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11714 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11715 please send us a bug report.
11717 @node I can't build Bison
11718 @section I can't build Bison
11721 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11722 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11726 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11727 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11728 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11729 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11730 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11731 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11732 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11735 @node Where can I find help?
11736 @section Where can I find help?
11739 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11742 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11743 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11744 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11745 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11746 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11747 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11748 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11749 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11753 @section Bug Reports
11756 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11759 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11760 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11761 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11762 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11763 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11765 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11766 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11767 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11768 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11769 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11771 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11772 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11773 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11774 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11775 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11776 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11778 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11779 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11781 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11783 @node More Languages
11784 @section More Languages
11787 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11788 favorite language here}?
11791 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11792 languages; contributions are welcome.
11795 @section Beta Testing
11798 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11801 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11802 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11803 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11804 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11805 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11806 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11807 essentially halted.
11809 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11810 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11811 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11812 systems are especially welcome.
11814 @node Mailing Lists
11815 @section Mailing Lists
11818 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11821 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11823 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11825 @node Table of Symbols
11826 @appendix Bison Symbols
11827 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11828 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11830 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11831 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11832 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11835 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11836 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11837 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11840 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11841 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11845 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11846 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11850 @deffn {Variable} $$
11851 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11855 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11856 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11857 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11860 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11861 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11865 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11866 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11870 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11871 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11872 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11873 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11876 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11877 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11878 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11879 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11880 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11884 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
11885 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
11886 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
11887 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
11888 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
11889 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
11890 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
11892 This feature is experimental.
11893 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11897 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11898 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11901 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11902 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11906 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11907 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11910 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11911 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11912 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11915 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11916 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11919 This feature is experimental.
11920 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11923 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11926 @deffn {Directive} <>
11927 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11930 This feature is experimental.
11931 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11934 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11937 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11938 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11939 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11940 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11943 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11944 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11945 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11946 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11947 @xref{%code Summary}.
11950 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11951 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11955 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11956 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11957 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11962 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11963 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11964 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11965 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11968 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11969 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11970 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11973 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11974 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11975 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11978 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11979 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11980 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11983 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11984 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11985 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11989 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11990 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11991 used in the grammar.
11994 @deffn {Symbol} error
11995 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11996 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11997 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11998 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11999 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12000 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12001 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12002 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12005 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12006 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12007 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12010 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12011 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12015 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12016 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12017 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12020 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12021 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12024 @deffn {Directive} %language
12025 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12026 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12029 @deffn {Directive} %left
12030 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12031 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12034 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12035 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12036 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12040 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12041 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12042 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12043 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12044 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12047 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12048 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12049 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12051 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12052 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12053 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12055 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12056 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12057 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12058 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12059 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12060 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12061 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12062 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
12067 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12068 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12069 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12074 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12075 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12076 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12079 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12080 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12081 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12084 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12085 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12086 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12089 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12090 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12091 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12092 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12095 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12096 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12097 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12100 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12101 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12102 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12105 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12106 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12107 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12110 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12111 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12112 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12113 unreasonable usage.
12116 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12117 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12118 Require a Version of Bison}.
12121 @deffn {Directive} %right
12122 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12123 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12126 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12127 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12128 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12131 @deffn {Directive} %start
12132 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12136 @deffn {Directive} %token
12137 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12138 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12141 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12142 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12143 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12146 @deffn {Directive} %type
12147 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12148 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12151 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12152 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12153 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12157 @deffn {Directive} %union
12158 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12159 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
12162 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12163 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12164 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12165 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12166 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12168 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12172 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12173 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12174 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12175 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12177 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12181 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12182 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12183 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12186 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12187 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12188 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12189 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12190 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12193 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12194 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12195 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12198 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12199 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12200 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12203 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12204 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12205 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12206 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12209 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12210 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12211 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12214 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12215 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12216 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12217 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12218 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12219 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12221 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12225 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12226 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12227 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12230 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12231 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12232 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12233 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12234 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12235 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12236 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12239 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12240 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12241 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12244 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12245 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12246 @xref{Memory Management}.
12249 @deffn {Function} yylex
12250 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12251 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12255 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
12256 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
12257 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
12258 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
12259 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
12262 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12263 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12264 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12265 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12267 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12269 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12270 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12271 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12274 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12275 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12276 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12279 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12280 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12281 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12282 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12284 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12285 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12286 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12289 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12290 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12294 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12295 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12296 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12297 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
12298 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12301 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12302 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12303 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12306 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
12307 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
12308 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
12309 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
12312 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
12313 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12314 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
12315 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
12316 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
12317 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12318 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12321 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
12322 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12323 call this function to create a new parser.
12324 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
12325 @code{yypstate_new}}.
12326 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12327 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12330 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
12331 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12332 parse the rest of the input stream.
12333 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
12334 @code{yypull_parse}}.
12335 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12336 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12339 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
12340 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12341 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
12342 @code{yypush_parse}}.
12343 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12344 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12347 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12348 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12349 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12350 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12353 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12354 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12355 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12356 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12357 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12358 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12359 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12361 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12362 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12363 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12364 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12365 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12366 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12367 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12370 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12371 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12372 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12380 @item Accepting state
12381 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12382 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12383 @xref{Understanding,,}.
12385 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12386 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12387 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12388 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12389 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12391 @item Consistent state
12392 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12394 @item Context-free grammars
12395 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12396 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12397 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12398 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12401 @item Default reduction
12402 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12403 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12404 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12405 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12408 @item Defaulted state
12409 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12411 @item Dynamic allocation
12412 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12413 compile time or on entry to a function.
12416 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12417 character string of length zero.
12419 @item Finite-state stack machine
12420 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12421 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12422 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12423 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12424 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12425 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12427 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12428 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12429 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12430 deterministic parsing
12431 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
12432 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
12433 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
12437 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
12438 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
12439 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12441 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
12442 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
12443 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
12444 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
12445 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
12446 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
12447 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
12448 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
12449 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
12450 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12452 @item Infix operator
12453 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12454 performs some operation.
12457 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12459 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12460 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12461 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12462 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12463 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12464 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12465 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12467 @item Language construct
12468 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12469 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12470 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12472 @item Left associativity
12473 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12474 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12475 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12477 @item Left recursion
12478 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12479 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12482 @item Left-to-right parsing
12483 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12484 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12486 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12487 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12488 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12490 @item Lexical tie-in
12491 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12492 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12494 @item Literal string token
12495 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12497 @item Lookahead token
12498 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12502 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12503 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12504 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12507 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12508 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12510 @item Nonterminal symbol
12511 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
12512 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
12513 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
12516 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
12517 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
12520 @item Postfix operator
12521 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
12522 performs some operation.
12525 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
12526 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
12530 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
12531 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
12532 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
12534 @item Reverse polish notation
12535 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
12537 @item Right recursion
12538 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
12539 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12543 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12544 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12545 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12548 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12549 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12550 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12552 @item Single-character literal
12553 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12554 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12557 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12558 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12559 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12560 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12563 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12564 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12565 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12568 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12569 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12572 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12573 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12574 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12575 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12577 @item Terminal symbol
12578 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12579 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12580 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12582 @item Unreachable state
12583 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12584 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12585 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12588 @node Copying This Manual
12589 @appendix Copying This Manual
12593 @unnumbered Bibliography
12597 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12598 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12599 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12600 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12602 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12603 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12604 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12605 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12606 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12608 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12609 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12610 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12611 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12612 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12614 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12615 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12616 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12617 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12618 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12621 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12622 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12623 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12626 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12627 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12628 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12629 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12632 @node Index of Terms
12633 @unnumbered Index of Terms
12639 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
12640 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
12641 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
12642 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12643 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12644 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12645 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12646 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12647 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12648 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12649 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12650 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12651 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12652 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12653 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12654 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12655 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12656 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12657 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12658 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12659 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12660 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12661 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12662 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12663 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12664 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12665 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12666 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12667 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12668 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12669 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12670 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12671 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12672 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12673 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12674 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12675 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12676 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12677 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12678 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12679 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12680 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12681 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12682 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12683 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12684 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12685 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12686 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12687 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12688 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
12689 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12690 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
12691 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
12692 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
12693 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose
12695 @c Local Variables:
12696 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"