1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
190 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
191 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
192 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
193 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
194 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
196 Outline of a Bison Grammar
198 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
199 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
200 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
201 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
202 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
204 Defining Language Semantics
206 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
207 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
208 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
209 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
210 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
211 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
212 action in the middle of a rule.
216 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
217 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
218 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
222 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
223 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
224 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
225 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
226 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
227 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
228 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
229 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
230 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
231 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
232 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
233 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
234 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
235 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
237 Parser C-Language Interface
239 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
240 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
241 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
242 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
243 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
244 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
246 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
247 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
248 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
251 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
253 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
254 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
255 of the token it has read.
256 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
257 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
259 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
260 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
262 The Bison Parser Algorithm
264 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
265 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
266 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
267 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
268 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
269 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
270 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
271 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
272 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
273 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
277 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
278 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
279 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
280 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
281 * How Precedence:: How they work.
285 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
286 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
287 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
288 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
290 Handling Context Dependencies
292 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
293 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
294 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
295 error recovery rules must be written.
297 Debugging Your Parser
299 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
300 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
304 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
305 in alphabetical order by short options.
306 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
307 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
309 Parsers Written In Other Languages
311 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
312 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
316 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
317 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
318 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
319 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
320 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
321 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
323 A Complete C++ Example
325 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
326 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
327 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
328 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
329 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
333 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
334 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
335 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
336 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
337 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
338 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
339 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
340 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
342 Frequently Asked Questions
344 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
345 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
346 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
347 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
348 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
349 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
350 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
351 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
352 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
353 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
354 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
355 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
359 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
365 @unnumbered Introduction
368 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
369 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
370 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
371 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
372 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
373 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
374 calculators to complex programming languages.
376 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
377 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
378 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
379 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
380 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
383 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
384 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
385 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
386 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
389 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
390 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
391 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
392 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
393 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
394 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
397 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
400 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
402 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
403 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
404 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
405 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
406 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
408 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
410 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
411 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
412 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
413 License to all of the Bison source code.
415 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
416 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
417 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
418 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
419 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
420 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
421 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
423 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
424 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
425 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
426 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
427 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
428 using the other GNU tools.
430 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
431 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
432 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
433 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
437 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
438 @include gpl-3.0.texi
441 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
443 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
444 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
445 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
448 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
449 as mathematical ideas.
450 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
451 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
452 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
453 the name of an identifier, etc.).
454 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
455 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
456 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
457 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
458 how is the output used?
459 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
460 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
463 @node Language and Grammar
464 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
466 @cindex context-free grammar
467 @cindex grammar, context-free
468 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
469 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
470 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
471 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
472 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
473 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
474 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
475 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
479 @cindex Backus-Naur form
480 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
481 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
482 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
483 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
484 essentially machine-readable BNF.
486 @cindex LALR grammars
487 @cindex IELR grammars
489 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
490 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
491 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
492 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
493 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
494 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
495 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
496 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
497 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
498 Construction}, to learn how.
501 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
502 @cindex ambiguous grammars
503 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
505 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
506 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
507 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
508 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
509 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
510 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
511 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
512 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
513 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
514 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
515 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
516 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
517 possible parses of any given string is finite.
519 @cindex symbols (abstract)
521 @cindex syntactic grouping
522 @cindex grouping, syntactic
523 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
524 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
525 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
526 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
527 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
528 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
529 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
531 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
532 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
533 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
534 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
535 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
536 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
537 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
538 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
539 lexicography, not grammar.)
541 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
545 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
546 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
547 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
548 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
549 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
550 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
551 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
556 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
557 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
558 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
559 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
560 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
564 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
565 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
566 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
567 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
568 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
569 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
570 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
571 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
573 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
574 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
575 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
576 reads informally as follows:
579 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
584 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
588 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
589 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
590 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
591 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
594 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
595 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
596 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
597 not the start symbol.
599 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
600 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
601 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
602 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
603 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
604 reports a syntax error.
606 @node Grammar in Bison
607 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
608 @cindex Bison grammar
609 @cindex grammar, Bison
610 @cindex formal grammar
612 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
613 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
614 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
616 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
617 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
618 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
620 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
621 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
622 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
623 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
624 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
625 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
626 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
629 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
630 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
631 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
632 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
634 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
635 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
637 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
638 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
639 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
640 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
644 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
649 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
651 @node Semantic Values
652 @section Semantic Values
653 @cindex semantic value
654 @cindex value, semantic
656 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
657 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
658 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
659 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
660 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
663 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
664 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
665 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
666 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
667 ,Defining Language Semantics},
670 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
671 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
672 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
673 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
676 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
677 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
678 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
679 need to have any semantic value.)
681 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
682 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
683 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
684 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
685 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
686 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
688 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
689 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
690 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
691 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
692 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
694 @node Semantic Actions
695 @section Semantic Actions
696 @cindex semantic actions
697 @cindex actions, semantic
699 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
700 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
701 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
702 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
705 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
706 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
707 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
708 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
709 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
710 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
711 newly recognized larger expression.
713 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
717 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
722 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
723 from the values of the two subexpressions.
726 @section Writing GLR Parsers
728 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
731 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
732 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
734 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
735 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
736 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
737 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
738 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
739 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
740 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
741 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
742 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
744 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
745 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
746 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
747 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
748 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
749 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
750 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
751 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
752 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
753 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
754 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
755 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
756 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
757 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
758 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
759 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
760 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
761 identical set of symbols.
763 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
764 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
765 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
766 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
767 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
768 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
769 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
770 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
771 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
775 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
776 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
777 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
778 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
779 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
782 @node Simple GLR Parsers
783 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
784 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
785 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
789 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
790 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
792 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
793 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
794 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
796 Consider a problem that
797 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
798 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
801 type subrange = lo .. hi;
802 type enum = (a, b, c);
806 The original language standard allows only numeric
807 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
808 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
809 10206) and many other
810 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
811 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
815 type subrange = (a) .. b;
819 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
820 type with only one value:
827 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
828 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
830 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
831 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
832 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
833 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
834 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
835 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
836 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
837 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
839 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
840 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
841 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
842 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
845 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
846 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
847 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
848 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
849 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
850 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
853 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
854 use the GLR algorithm.
855 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
856 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
857 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
858 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
859 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
860 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
861 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
862 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
863 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
865 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
866 reports a syntax error as usual.
868 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
869 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
870 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
871 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
872 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
874 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
875 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
876 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
877 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
878 The present example contains only one conflict between two
879 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
880 cannot be nested. So the number of
881 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
882 and the parsing time is still linear.
884 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
885 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
888 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
898 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
903 type : '(' id_list ')'
925 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
926 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
927 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
928 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
935 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
936 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
937 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
946 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
947 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
948 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
949 notice when the parser splits.
951 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
952 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
953 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
954 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
955 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
956 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
957 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
958 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
959 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
960 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
961 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
962 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
963 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
966 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
967 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
968 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
969 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
970 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
971 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
973 @node Merging GLR Parses
974 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
975 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
976 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
980 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
982 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
987 #define YYSTYPE char const *
989 void yyerror (char const *);
1002 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1005 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
1009 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1010 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1011 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1012 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1013 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1016 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1017 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1018 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1019 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1022 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1023 | '(' declarator ')'
1028 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1029 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1036 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1037 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1038 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1039 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1040 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1041 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1042 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1043 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1044 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1045 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1046 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1047 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1048 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1049 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1051 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1052 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1053 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1054 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1055 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1056 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1057 The parser therefore prints
1060 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1063 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1064 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1071 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1072 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1073 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1074 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1075 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1076 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1077 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1078 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1079 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1080 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1086 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1087 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1088 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1089 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1093 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1094 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1099 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1103 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1111 with an accompanying forward declaration
1112 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1116 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1117 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1122 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1123 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1126 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1129 Bison requires that all of the
1130 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1131 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1132 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1133 the offending merge.
1135 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1136 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1138 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1139 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1141 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1142 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1143 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1144 the associated reduction.
1145 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1146 action in a GLR parser.
1149 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1151 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1153 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1154 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1155 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1156 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1157 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1158 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1159 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1160 influence syntax analysis.
1161 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1164 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1165 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1166 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1167 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1168 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1169 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1170 future versions of Bison.
1171 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1172 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1173 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1175 @subsubsection YYERROR
1177 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1178 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1179 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1180 initiate error recovery.
1181 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1182 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1183 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1184 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1185 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1186 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1187 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1188 the parse that invoked the test.
1190 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1191 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1192 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1195 @node Semantic Predicates
1196 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1198 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1200 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1202 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1203 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1204 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1205 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1209 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1210 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1215 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1216 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1217 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1218 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1219 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1220 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1221 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1223 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1224 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1225 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1226 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1229 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1230 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1231 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1235 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1236 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1241 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1242 false). However, this
1243 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1244 have overlapping syntax.
1245 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1246 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1247 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1248 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1251 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1252 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1254 @node Compiler Requirements
1255 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1256 @cindex @code{inline}
1257 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1259 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1260 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1261 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1262 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1263 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1264 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1273 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1277 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1286 @cindex textual location
1287 @cindex location, textual
1289 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1290 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1291 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1292 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1294 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1295 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1296 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1297 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1300 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1301 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1302 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1305 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1306 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1307 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1308 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1309 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1310 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1311 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1314 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1315 @cindex Bison parser
1316 @cindex Bison utility
1317 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1320 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1321 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1322 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1323 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1324 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1325 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1326 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1329 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1330 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1331 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1334 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1335 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1336 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1337 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1338 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1339 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1340 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1342 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1343 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1344 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1345 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1346 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1347 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1348 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1349 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1350 C-Language Interface}.
1352 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1353 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1354 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1355 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1356 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1357 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1358 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1359 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1360 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1361 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1362 anything other than their usual meanings.
1364 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1365 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1366 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1367 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1368 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1369 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1370 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1371 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1372 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1375 @section Stages in Using Bison
1376 @cindex stages in using Bison
1379 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1380 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1384 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1385 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1386 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1387 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1388 sequence of C statements.
1391 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1392 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1393 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1394 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1397 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1400 Write error-reporting routines.
1403 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1404 must follow these steps:
1408 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1411 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1414 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1417 @node Grammar Layout
1418 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1419 @cindex grammar file
1421 @cindex format of grammar file
1422 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1424 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1425 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1432 @var{Bison declarations}
1441 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1442 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1444 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1445 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1446 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1447 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1448 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1449 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1451 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1452 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1453 semantic values of various symbols.
1455 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1458 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1459 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1460 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1464 @cindex simple examples
1465 @cindex examples, simple
1467 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1468 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1469 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1470 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1471 desk-top calculator.
1473 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1474 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1475 source file to try them.
1478 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1479 a first example with no operator precedence.
1480 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1481 Operator precedence is introduced.
1482 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1483 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1484 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1485 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1486 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1490 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1491 @cindex reverse polish notation
1492 @cindex polish notation calculator
1493 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1494 @cindex calculator, simple
1496 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1497 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1498 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1499 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1501 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1502 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1505 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1506 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1507 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1508 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1509 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1510 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1511 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1514 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1515 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1517 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1518 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1520 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1522 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1525 #define YYSTYPE double
1529 void yyerror (char const *);
1534 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1537 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1538 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1540 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1541 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1542 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1543 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1544 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1545 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1546 which is a floating point number.
1548 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1549 function @code{pow}.
1551 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1552 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1553 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1554 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1557 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1558 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1559 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1560 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1561 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1562 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1563 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1564 type for numeric constants.
1567 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1569 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1571 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1578 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1581 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1582 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1583 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1584 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1585 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1586 /* Exponentiation */
1587 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1589 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1594 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1595 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1596 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1597 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1598 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1601 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1602 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1603 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1605 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1606 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1607 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1608 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1609 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1610 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1613 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1614 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1615 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1619 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1621 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1629 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1630 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1631 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1632 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1633 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1635 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1636 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1637 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1638 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1639 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1640 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1642 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1643 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1644 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1645 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1648 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1649 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1650 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1653 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1655 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1659 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1663 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1664 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1665 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1666 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1667 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1668 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1669 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1671 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1672 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1673 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1674 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1675 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1678 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1680 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1681 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1682 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1683 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1687 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1688 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1693 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1694 equally well have written them separately:
1698 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1699 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1703 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1704 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1705 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1706 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1707 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1708 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1709 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1710 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1712 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1713 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1714 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1716 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1717 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1721 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1725 means the same thing as this:
1729 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1735 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1738 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1739 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1740 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1742 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1743 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1744 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1745 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1747 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1749 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1750 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1751 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1752 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1754 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1755 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1756 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1757 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1758 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1759 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1760 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1761 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1762 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1764 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1765 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1766 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1767 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1768 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1770 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1771 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1773 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1775 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1778 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1779 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1780 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1781 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1792 /* Skip white space. */
1793 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1797 /* Process numbers. */
1798 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1801 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1806 /* Return end-of-input. */
1809 /* Return a single char. */
1816 @subsection The Controlling Function
1817 @cindex controlling function
1818 @cindex main function in simple example
1820 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1821 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1822 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1824 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1836 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1837 @cindex error reporting routine
1839 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1840 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1841 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1842 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1843 here is the definition we will use:
1845 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1850 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1852 yyerror (char const *s)
1854 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1859 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1860 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1861 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1862 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1863 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1864 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1866 @node Rpcalc Generate
1867 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1868 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1870 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1871 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1872 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1873 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1874 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1875 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1877 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1878 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1880 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1881 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1888 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1889 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1890 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1891 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1892 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1893 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1894 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1896 @node Rpcalc Compile
1897 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1898 @cindex compiling the parser
1900 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1904 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1906 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1910 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1911 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1912 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1916 # @r{List files again.}
1918 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1922 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1923 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1929 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1931 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1934 @result{} -3.166666667
1935 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1937 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1942 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1943 @cindex infix notation calculator
1945 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1947 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1948 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1949 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1950 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1953 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1956 #define YYSTYPE double
1960 void yyerror (char const *);
1963 /* Bison declarations. */
1967 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1968 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1970 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1976 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1979 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1980 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1981 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1982 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1983 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1984 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1985 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1986 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1992 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1995 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1997 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1998 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1999 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2000 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2001 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2002 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2003 the associativity/precedence.)
2005 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2006 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2007 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2008 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2009 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2010 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2013 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2014 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2015 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2016 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2017 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2019 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2024 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2032 @node Simple Error Recovery
2033 @section Simple Error Recovery
2034 @cindex error recovery, simple
2036 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2037 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2038 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2039 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2040 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2041 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2043 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2044 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2045 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2050 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2051 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2056 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2057 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2058 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2059 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2060 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2061 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2062 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2063 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2066 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2067 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2068 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2069 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2070 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2071 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2074 @node Location Tracking Calc
2075 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2076 @cindex location tracking calculator
2077 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2078 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2080 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2081 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2082 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2083 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2087 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2088 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2089 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2092 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2093 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2095 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2096 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2099 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2105 void yyerror (char const *);
2108 /* Bison declarations. */
2116 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2120 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2121 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2122 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2123 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2124 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2125 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2126 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2130 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2132 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2133 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2134 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2135 from the new information.
2137 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2138 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2149 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2154 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2155 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2156 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2157 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2167 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2168 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2169 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2174 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2175 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2176 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2180 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2181 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2182 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2184 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2185 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2186 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2187 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2188 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2189 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2193 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2195 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2196 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2197 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2200 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2201 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2212 /* Skip white space. */
2213 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2214 ++yylloc.last_column;
2219 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2220 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2224 /* Process numbers. */
2228 ++yylloc.last_column;
2229 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2231 ++yylloc.last_column;
2232 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2239 /* Return end-of-input. */
2244 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2248 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2251 ++yylloc.last_column;
2257 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2258 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2259 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2260 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2262 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2263 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2264 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2265 controlling function:
2272 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2273 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2279 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2280 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2281 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2283 @node Multi-function Calc
2284 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2285 @cindex multi-function calculator
2286 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2287 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2289 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2290 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2291 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2292 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2293 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2295 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2296 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2297 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2298 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2299 functions whose syntax has this form:
2302 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2306 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2307 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2308 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2313 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2314 @result{} 3.1415926536
2318 @result{} 0.0000000000
2320 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2321 @result{} 2.3000000000
2323 @result{} 2.3000000000
2325 @result{} 0.8329091229
2326 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2327 @result{} 2.3000000000
2331 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2334 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2335 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2336 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2337 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2338 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2341 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2342 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2344 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2346 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2350 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2351 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2352 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2354 void yyerror (char const *);
2359 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2360 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2363 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2364 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2371 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2372 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2374 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2377 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2378 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2379 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2381 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2382 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2383 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2384 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2386 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2387 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2388 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2389 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2390 between angle brackets).
2392 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2393 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2394 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2395 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2396 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2397 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2400 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2402 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2403 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2404 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2406 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2417 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2418 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2423 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2424 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2425 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2426 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2427 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2428 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2429 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2430 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2431 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2432 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2433 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2436 /* End of grammar. */
2440 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2441 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2442 @cindex symbol table example
2444 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2445 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2446 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2447 requires some additional C functions for support.
2449 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2450 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2451 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2453 @comment file: calc.h
2456 /* Function type. */
2457 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2461 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2464 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2465 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2468 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2469 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2471 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2476 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2478 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2479 extern symrec *sym_table;
2481 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2482 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2486 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2489 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2495 double (*fnct) (double);
2500 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2513 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2518 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2525 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2527 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2528 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2534 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2535 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2537 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2538 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2539 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2540 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2541 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2542 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2544 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2546 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2547 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2551 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2554 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2555 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2556 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2557 ptr->type = sym_type;
2558 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2559 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2567 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2570 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2571 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2572 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2580 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2582 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2583 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2584 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2585 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2587 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2588 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2589 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2590 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2591 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2592 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2594 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2595 operators in @code{yylex}.
2597 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2609 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2610 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2618 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2619 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2622 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2628 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2632 static char *symbuf = 0;
2633 static int length = 0;
2638 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2639 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2643 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2651 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2655 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2657 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2659 /* Get another character. */
2664 while (isalnum (c));
2671 s = getsym (symbuf);
2673 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2678 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2685 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2687 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2688 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}:
2690 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2695 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2697 yyerror (char const *s)
2699 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2704 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2712 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2713 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2714 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2722 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2725 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2726 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2727 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2730 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2731 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2735 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2737 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2738 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2740 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2741 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2744 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2745 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2746 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2747 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2748 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2749 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2750 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2751 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2752 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2755 @node Grammar Outline
2756 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2758 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2759 appropriate delimiters:
2766 @var{Bison declarations}
2775 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2776 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2777 continues until end of line.
2780 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2781 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2782 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2783 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2784 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2788 @subsection The prologue
2789 @cindex declarations section
2791 @cindex declarations
2793 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2794 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2795 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2796 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2797 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2798 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2799 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2801 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2802 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2805 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2806 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2807 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2808 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2809 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2810 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2811 @code{%union} declaration.
2822 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2826 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2827 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2833 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2834 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2835 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2836 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2837 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2838 @code{#include} directives.
2840 @node Prologue Alternatives
2841 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2842 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2845 @findex %code requires
2846 @findex %code provides
2849 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2850 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2851 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2852 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2853 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2854 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2855 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2857 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2868 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2872 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2873 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2880 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2881 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2882 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2883 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2884 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2885 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2886 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2887 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2888 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2889 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2890 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2892 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2893 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2894 This behavior raises a few questions.
2895 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2896 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2897 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2898 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2899 This behavior is not intuitive.
2901 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2902 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2903 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2904 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2911 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2912 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2915 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2916 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2928 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2932 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2933 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2934 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2941 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2942 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2943 explicit which kind you intend.
2944 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2946 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2947 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2948 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2949 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2950 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2951 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2952 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2953 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2954 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2957 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2958 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2960 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2978 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2984 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2985 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2998 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2999 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3000 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3008 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3009 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3010 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3011 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3012 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3013 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3015 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3016 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3017 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3018 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3019 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3020 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3021 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3022 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3023 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3024 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3025 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3028 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3029 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3030 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3031 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3032 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3033 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3034 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3035 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3036 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3037 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3055 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3061 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3062 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3075 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3081 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3082 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3090 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3091 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3092 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3095 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3096 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3097 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3098 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3099 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3100 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3103 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3104 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3105 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3106 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3108 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3109 organize your grammar file.
3110 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3115 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3116 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3117 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3118 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
3122 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3123 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3124 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3125 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
3130 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3131 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3133 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3135 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3136 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3137 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3138 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3140 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3141 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3142 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3143 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3144 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3145 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3146 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3147 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3150 @node Bison Declarations
3151 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3152 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3153 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3155 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3156 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3157 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3158 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3161 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3162 @cindex grammar rules section
3163 @cindex rules section for grammar
3165 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3166 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3168 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3169 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3170 if it is the first thing in the file.
3173 @subsection The epilogue
3174 @cindex additional C code section
3176 @cindex C code, section for additional
3178 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3179 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3180 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3181 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3182 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3183 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3184 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3185 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3186 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3187 C-Language Interface}.
3189 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3190 from the grammar rules.
3192 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3193 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3194 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3195 of the grammar file.
3198 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3199 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3200 @cindex terminal symbol
3204 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3207 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3208 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3209 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3210 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3211 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3212 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3213 the symbol to stand for it.
3215 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3216 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3217 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3219 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3220 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3221 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3222 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3223 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3224 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3225 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3227 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3231 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3232 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3233 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3234 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3237 @cindex character token
3238 @cindex literal token
3239 @cindex single-character literal
3240 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3241 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3242 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3243 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3244 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3245 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3246 ,Operator Precedence}).
3248 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3249 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3250 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3251 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3252 your program will confuse other readers.
3254 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3255 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3256 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3257 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3258 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3259 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3263 @cindex string token
3264 @cindex literal string token
3265 @cindex multicharacter literal
3266 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3267 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3268 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3269 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3270 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3272 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3273 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3274 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3275 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3276 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3278 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3280 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3281 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3282 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3283 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3284 read your program will be confused.
3286 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3287 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3288 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3289 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3290 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3291 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3294 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3295 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3296 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3298 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3299 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3300 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3301 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3302 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3303 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3304 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3305 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3306 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3307 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3308 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3309 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3311 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3312 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3313 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3314 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3315 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3317 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3318 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3319 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3320 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3321 characters in the following C-language string:
3324 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3327 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3328 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3329 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3330 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3331 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3332 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3333 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3334 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3335 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3336 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3339 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3340 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3341 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3342 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3343 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3346 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3348 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3349 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3351 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3355 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3361 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3362 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3363 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3375 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3376 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3378 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3379 extra white space as you wish.
3381 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3382 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3385 @{@var{C statements}@}
3390 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3391 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3392 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3393 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3394 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3395 compiler can check it.
3397 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3398 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3399 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3400 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3401 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3402 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3403 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3404 character constants.
3406 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3410 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3411 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3415 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3416 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3423 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3425 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3426 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3427 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3444 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3448 @section Recursive Rules
3449 @cindex recursive rule
3451 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3452 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3453 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3454 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3455 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3465 @cindex left recursion
3466 @cindex right recursion
3468 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3469 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3470 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3481 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3482 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3483 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3484 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3485 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3486 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3487 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3490 @cindex mutual recursion
3491 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3492 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3493 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3501 | primary '+' primary
3513 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3517 @section Defining Language Semantics
3518 @cindex defining language semantics
3519 @cindex language semantics, defining
3521 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3522 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3523 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3525 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3526 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3527 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3528 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3531 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3532 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3533 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3534 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3535 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3536 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3537 action in the middle of a rule.
3541 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3542 @cindex semantic value type
3543 @cindex value type, semantic
3544 @cindex data types of semantic values
3545 @cindex default data type
3547 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3548 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3549 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3550 Notation Calculator}).
3552 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3553 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3554 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3557 #define YYSTYPE double
3561 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3562 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3563 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3564 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3566 @node Multiple Types
3567 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3569 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3570 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3571 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3572 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3575 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3576 requires you to do two things:
3580 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3581 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3582 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3583 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3587 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3588 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3589 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3590 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3591 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3600 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3602 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3603 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3604 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3605 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3607 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3608 placed at any position in the rule;
3609 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3610 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3611 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3612 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3614 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3615 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3616 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3617 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3618 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3619 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3620 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3621 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3622 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3623 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3626 Here is a typical example:
3636 Or, in terms of named references:
3640 exp[result]: @dots{}
3641 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3642 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3647 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3648 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3649 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3650 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3651 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3652 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3654 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3655 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3656 referred to as @code{$2}.
3658 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3659 references construct.
3661 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3662 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3663 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3664 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3665 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3669 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3673 @cindex default action
3674 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3675 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3676 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3677 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3678 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3679 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3681 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3682 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3683 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3684 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3685 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3689 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3690 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3696 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3701 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3702 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3703 definition of @code{foo}.
3706 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3707 any, from a semantic action.
3708 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3709 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3712 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3713 @cindex action data types
3714 @cindex data types in actions
3716 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3717 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3719 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3720 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3721 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3722 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3723 in the rule. In this example,
3734 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3735 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3736 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3737 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3739 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3740 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3741 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3753 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3754 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3756 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3757 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3758 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3759 @cindex mid-rule actions
3761 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3762 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3763 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3765 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3766 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3767 it is run before they are parsed.
3769 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3770 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3771 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3772 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3775 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3776 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3777 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3778 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3779 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3780 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3782 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3783 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3784 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3785 at the end of the rule.
3787 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3788 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3789 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3790 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3791 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3792 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3796 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3797 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3798 declare_variable ($3); @}
3800 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3805 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3806 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3807 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3808 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3809 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3810 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3811 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3812 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3814 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3815 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3816 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3817 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3818 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3821 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3822 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3823 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3824 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3825 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3827 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3828 Discarded Symbols}).
3829 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3830 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3832 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3833 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3838 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3844 pop_context ($1); @}
3847 let: LET '(' var ')'
3848 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3849 declare_variable ($3); @}
3856 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3857 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3858 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3860 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3861 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3862 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3863 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3864 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3869 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3870 | '@{' statements '@}'
3876 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3880 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3881 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3884 | '@{' statements '@}'
3890 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3891 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3892 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3893 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3894 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3895 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3897 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3898 actions into the two rules, like this:
3902 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3903 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3904 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3905 '@{' statements '@}'
3911 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3912 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3914 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3915 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3916 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3920 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3921 declarations statements '@}'
3922 | '@{' statements '@}'
3928 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3929 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3931 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3932 serves as a subroutine:
3936 subroutine: /* empty */
3937 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3943 compound: subroutine
3944 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3946 '@{' statements '@}'
3952 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3953 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3955 @node Tracking Locations
3956 @section Tracking Locations
3958 @cindex textual location
3959 @cindex location, textual
3961 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3962 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3963 especially symbol locations.
3965 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3966 actions to take when rules are matched.
3969 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3970 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3971 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3975 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3976 @cindex data type of locations
3977 @cindex default location type
3979 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3980 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3982 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3983 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3984 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3985 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3989 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3998 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3999 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4000 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4001 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4002 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4004 @node Actions and Locations
4005 @subsection Actions and Locations
4006 @cindex location actions
4007 @cindex actions, location
4010 @vindex @@@var{name}
4011 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4013 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4014 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4016 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4017 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4018 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4019 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4020 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4023 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4024 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4025 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4026 references construct.
4028 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4035 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4036 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4037 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4038 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4045 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4046 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4047 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4053 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4054 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4055 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4058 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4059 example above simply rewrites this way:
4072 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4073 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4074 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4081 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4082 from a semantic action.
4083 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4084 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4086 @node Location Default Action
4087 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4088 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4089 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4091 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4092 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4093 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4094 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4095 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4096 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4097 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4098 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4101 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4102 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4104 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4105 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4106 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4107 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4108 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4109 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4110 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4111 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4112 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4113 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4115 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4119 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
4123 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4124 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4125 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4126 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4130 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
4131 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4132 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
4133 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4139 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4140 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4141 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4143 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4147 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4148 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4151 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4152 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4153 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4154 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4157 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4158 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4159 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4160 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4163 @node Named References
4164 @section Named References
4165 @cindex named references
4167 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4168 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4169 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4170 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4171 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4172 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4174 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4175 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4176 used as named references. For example:
4180 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4181 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4186 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4190 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4191 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4196 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4202 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4205 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4208 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4213 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4214 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4215 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4218 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4219 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4224 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4225 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4226 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4229 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4230 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4236 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4237 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4240 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4241 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4245 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4246 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4247 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4248 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4249 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4250 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4251 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4253 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4257 @section Bison Declarations
4258 @cindex declarations, Bison
4259 @cindex Bison declarations
4261 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4262 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4265 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4266 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4267 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4268 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4270 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4271 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4272 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4273 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4276 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4277 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4278 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4279 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4280 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4281 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4282 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4283 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4284 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4285 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4286 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4287 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4288 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4289 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4293 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4294 @cindex version requirement
4295 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4298 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4299 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4303 %require "@var{version}"
4307 @subsection Token Type Names
4308 @cindex declaring token type names
4309 @cindex token type names, declaring
4310 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4313 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4319 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4320 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4321 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4323 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4324 @code{%precedence}, or
4325 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4326 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4329 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4330 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4331 following the token name:
4335 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4339 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4340 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4341 with each other or with normal characters.
4343 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4344 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4345 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4346 Than One Value Type}).
4352 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4356 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4360 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4361 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4362 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4369 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4370 equivalent literal string tokens:
4373 %token <operator> OR "||"
4374 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4379 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4380 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4381 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4382 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4383 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4384 the literal string instead of the token name.
4386 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4387 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4391 %token END 0 "end of file"
4394 @node Precedence Decl
4395 @subsection Operator Precedence
4396 @cindex precedence declarations
4397 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4398 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4400 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4401 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4402 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4403 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4404 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4405 operator precedence.
4407 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4408 @code{%token}: either
4411 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4418 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4421 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4422 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4423 all the @var{symbols}:
4427 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4428 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4429 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4430 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4431 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4432 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4433 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4434 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4435 considered a syntax error.
4437 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4438 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4439 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4442 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4443 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4444 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4445 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4446 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4449 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4450 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4451 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4452 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4457 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4458 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4462 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4463 @cindex declaring value types
4464 @cindex value types, declaring
4467 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4468 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4469 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4484 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4485 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4486 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4487 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4489 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4490 @code{union}. For example:
4502 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4503 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4506 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4507 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4508 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4510 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4511 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4513 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4514 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4515 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4516 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4524 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4529 and then your grammar can use the following
4530 instead of @code{%union}:
4543 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4544 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4545 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4549 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4550 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4551 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4554 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4558 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4559 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4560 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4561 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4562 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4565 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4566 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4567 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4568 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4570 @node Initial Action Decl
4571 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4572 @findex %initial-action
4574 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4575 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4578 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4579 @findex %initial-action
4580 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4581 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4582 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4583 @code{%parse-param}.
4586 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4589 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4592 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4597 @node Destructor Decl
4598 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4599 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4603 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4604 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4605 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4606 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4607 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4608 must discard the start symbol.
4610 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4611 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4612 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4613 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4615 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4616 symbol is automatically discarded.
4618 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4620 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4622 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4623 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4624 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4625 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4627 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4628 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4629 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4630 tag among @var{symbols}.
4631 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4632 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4633 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4635 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4636 (These default forms are experimental.
4637 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4639 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4640 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4641 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4642 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4644 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4645 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4646 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4647 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4648 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4655 %union @{ char *string; @}
4656 %token <string> STRING1
4657 %token <string> STRING2
4658 %type <string> string1
4659 %type <string> string2
4660 %union @{ char character; @}
4661 %token <character> CHR
4662 %type <character> chr
4665 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4666 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4667 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4668 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4672 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4673 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4674 to @code{free} by default.
4675 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4676 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4677 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4678 @code{free} only once.
4679 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4680 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4682 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4683 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4684 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4685 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4686 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4687 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4688 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4689 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4690 reference it in your grammar.
4691 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4692 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4698 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4699 @cindex mid-rule actions
4700 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4701 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4702 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4703 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4704 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4705 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4706 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4707 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4711 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4712 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4713 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4718 @cindex discarded symbols
4719 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4723 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4725 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4727 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4728 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4730 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4733 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4734 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4737 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4738 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4739 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4743 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4744 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4745 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4746 @cindex warnings, preventing
4747 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4751 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4752 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4753 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4754 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4755 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4756 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4758 The declaration looks like this:
4764 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4765 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4766 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4767 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4769 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4770 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4771 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4772 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4773 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4774 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4775 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4781 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4785 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4786 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4787 print the number of conflicts.
4790 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4791 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4792 go back to the beginning.
4795 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4796 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4797 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4800 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4801 but will keep silent otherwise.
4804 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4805 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4806 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4807 @cindex default start symbol
4810 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4811 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4812 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4819 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4820 @cindex reentrant parser
4822 @findex %define api.pure
4824 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4825 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4826 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4827 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4828 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4829 program must be called only within interlocks.
4831 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4832 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4833 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4834 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4835 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4837 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4838 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4839 reentrant. It looks like this:
4845 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4846 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4847 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4848 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4849 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4850 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4851 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4852 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4853 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4855 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4856 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4860 @subsection A Push Parser
4863 @findex %define api.push-pull
4865 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4866 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4868 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4869 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4870 each time a new token is made available.
4872 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4873 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4874 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4875 within a certain time period.
4877 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4878 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4879 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4882 %define api.push-pull push
4885 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4886 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4887 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4888 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4889 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4893 %define api.push-pull push
4896 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4897 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4898 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4899 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4901 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4902 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4903 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4904 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4905 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4906 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4907 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4908 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4912 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4914 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4915 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4916 yypstate_delete (ps);
4919 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4920 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4921 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4922 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4923 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4924 example would thus look like this:
4929 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4932 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4933 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4934 yypstate_delete (ps);
4937 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4938 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4940 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4941 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4942 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4943 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4944 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4945 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4946 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4947 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4948 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4949 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4950 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4951 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4952 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4953 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4954 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4955 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4956 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4960 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4961 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4962 yypstate_delete (ps);
4965 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4966 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4967 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
4970 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4971 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4972 @cindex declaration summary
4973 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4975 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4977 @deffn {Directive} %union
4978 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4979 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4982 @deffn {Directive} %token
4983 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4984 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4987 @deffn {Directive} %right
4988 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4989 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4992 @deffn {Directive} %left
4993 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4994 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4997 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4998 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4999 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5000 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5004 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5005 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5006 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5010 @deffn {Directive} %type
5011 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5012 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5015 @deffn {Directive} %start
5016 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5020 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5021 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5022 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5028 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5031 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5032 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5034 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5035 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5036 @xref{%code Summary}.
5039 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5040 Instrument the output parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5042 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5045 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5046 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5047 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5048 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5051 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5052 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5053 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5054 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5055 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5057 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5058 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5059 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5060 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5061 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5062 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5063 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5064 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5065 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5066 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5068 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5069 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5070 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5072 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5073 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5074 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5076 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5077 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5078 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5079 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5080 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5082 @findex %code requires
5083 @findex %code provides
5084 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5085 header also contains their code.
5086 @xref{%code Summary}.
5089 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5090 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5093 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5094 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5095 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5098 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5099 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5100 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5103 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5104 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5105 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5106 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5108 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5112 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5113 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5114 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5115 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5116 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5117 accurate syntax error messages.
5120 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5121 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5122 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5124 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5125 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5126 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5127 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5128 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5129 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5130 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5131 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5133 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5137 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5138 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5139 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5144 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5145 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5146 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5147 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5148 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5149 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5150 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5154 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5155 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5158 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5159 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5160 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5164 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5165 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5166 Require a Version of Bison}.
5169 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5170 Specify the skeleton to use.
5172 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5173 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5174 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5175 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5177 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5178 file in the Bison installation directory.
5179 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5180 directory of the grammar file.
5181 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5184 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5185 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5186 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5187 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5188 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5189 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5190 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5193 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5194 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5195 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5196 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5197 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5198 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5199 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5202 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5203 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5204 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5208 The highest token number, plus one.
5210 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5212 The number of grammar rules,
5214 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5218 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5219 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5220 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5221 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5225 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5226 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5227 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5231 @node %define Summary
5232 @subsection %define Summary
5234 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5235 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5236 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5237 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5238 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5239 @code{%define} directive:
5241 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5242 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5243 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5244 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5246 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5247 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5248 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5249 to specifying @code{""}.
5251 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5252 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5253 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5256 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5257 @code{%define} accepts.
5259 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5260 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5264 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5266 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5267 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5269 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5271 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5272 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5275 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5276 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5277 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5278 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5279 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5280 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5283 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5285 @findex %define api.namespace
5287 @item Languages(s): C++
5289 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5290 For example, if you specify:
5293 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5296 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5299 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5302 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5303 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5306 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5312 @item Accepted Values:
5313 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5314 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5316 @item Default Value:
5317 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5318 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5319 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5320 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5321 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5322 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5323 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5326 %define api.namespace "foo"
5327 %name-prefix "bar::"
5330 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5337 @c ================================================== api.pure
5339 @findex %define api.pure
5342 @item Language(s): C
5344 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5345 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5347 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5349 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5355 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5357 @findex %define api.push-pull
5360 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5362 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5363 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5364 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5365 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5367 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5369 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5375 @c ================================================== api.tokens.prefix
5376 @item api.tokens.prefix
5377 @findex %define api.tokens.prefix
5380 @item Languages(s): all
5383 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5384 target language. For instance
5387 %token FILE for ERROR
5388 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
5390 start: FILE for ERROR;
5394 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5395 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5396 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5397 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5398 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5399 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5400 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5402 @item Accepted Values:
5403 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5404 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5405 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5407 @item Default Value:
5410 @c api.tokens.prefix
5413 @c ================================================== lex_symbol
5415 @findex %define lex_symbol
5422 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5423 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5424 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5426 @item Accepted Values:
5429 @item Default Value:
5435 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5437 @item lr.default-reductions
5438 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5441 @item Language(s): all
5443 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5444 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5445 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5446 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5448 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5449 @item Default Value:
5451 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5452 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5456 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5458 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5459 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5462 @item Language(s): all
5463 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5464 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5465 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5466 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5468 @c lr.keep-unreachable-states
5470 @c ================================================== lr.type
5473 @findex %define lr.type
5476 @item Language(s): all
5478 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5479 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5480 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5482 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5484 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5488 @c ================================================== namespace
5490 @findex %define namespace
5491 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5495 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5497 @findex %define parse.assert
5500 @item Languages(s): C++
5502 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5503 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5505 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5507 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5509 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5514 @c ================================================== parse.error
5516 @findex %define parse.error
5521 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5522 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5524 @item Accepted Values:
5527 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5529 @item @code{verbose}
5530 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5531 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5535 @item Default Value:
5541 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5543 @findex %define parse.lac
5546 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5548 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5549 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5550 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5551 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5555 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5557 @findex %define parse.trace
5560 @item Languages(s): C, C++
5562 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5563 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 in the parser implementation
5564 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5565 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5567 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5569 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5573 @c ================================================== variant
5575 @findex %define variant
5582 Request variant-based semantic values.
5583 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5585 @item Accepted Values:
5588 @item Default Value:
5596 @subsection %code Summary
5600 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5601 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5602 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5603 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5604 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5605 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5606 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5607 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5609 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5610 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5611 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5612 in the parser implementation.
5614 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5615 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5616 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5618 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5621 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5622 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5623 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5624 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5625 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5626 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5630 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5631 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5632 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5635 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5636 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5640 @findex %code requires
5643 @item Language(s): C, C++
5645 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5646 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5647 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5648 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5649 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5651 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5652 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5657 @findex %code provides
5660 @item Language(s): C, C++
5662 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5663 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5665 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5666 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5674 @item Language(s): C, C++
5676 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5677 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5678 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5679 parser implementation file. For example:
5688 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5692 @findex %code imports
5695 @item Language(s): Java
5697 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5699 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5700 before any class definitions.
5704 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5705 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5706 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5707 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5710 @node Multiple Parsers
5711 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5713 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5714 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5715 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5716 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5718 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5719 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5720 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5721 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5722 names that do not conflict.
5724 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5725 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5726 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5727 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5728 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5729 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5730 @code{clex}, and so on.
5732 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5733 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5734 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5735 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5736 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5738 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5739 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5740 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5741 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5744 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5745 @cindex C-language interface
5748 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5749 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5750 functions that it needs to use.
5752 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5753 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5754 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5755 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5758 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5759 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5760 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5761 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5762 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5763 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5765 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5766 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5767 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5771 @node Parser Function
5772 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5775 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5776 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5777 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5778 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5779 without reading further.
5782 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5783 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5784 is due to end-of-input).
5786 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5787 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5790 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5793 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5798 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5803 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5806 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5807 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5808 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5810 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
5811 @findex %parse-param
5812 Declare that one or more
5813 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
5814 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5815 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5816 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5819 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5822 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
5826 Then call the parser like this:
5830 int nastiness, randomness;
5831 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5832 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5838 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5841 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5844 @node Push Parser Function
5845 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5846 @findex yypush_parse
5848 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5849 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5851 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5852 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5853 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5854 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5856 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5857 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5858 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5859 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5862 @node Pull Parser Function
5863 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5864 @findex yypull_parse
5866 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5867 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5869 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5870 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
5871 declaration is used.
5872 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5874 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5875 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5878 @node Parser Create Function
5879 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5880 @findex yypstate_new
5882 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5883 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5885 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5886 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5887 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5888 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5890 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5891 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5892 or 0 if no memory was available.
5893 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5897 @node Parser Delete Function
5898 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5899 @findex yypstate_delete
5901 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5902 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5904 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5905 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5906 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5907 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5909 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5910 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5911 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5915 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5917 @cindex lexical analyzer
5919 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5920 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5921 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5922 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5924 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5925 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5926 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5927 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5928 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5929 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5930 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5934 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5935 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5936 of the token it has read.
5937 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5938 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5940 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5941 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5944 @node Calling Convention
5945 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5947 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5948 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5949 signifies end-of-input.
5951 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5952 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5953 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5954 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5956 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5957 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5958 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5959 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5960 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5961 signifies end-of-input.
5963 Here is an example showing these things:
5970 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5973 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5974 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5976 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5982 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5983 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5985 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5986 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5990 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5991 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5992 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5993 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5996 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5997 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5998 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5999 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6000 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6003 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6004 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6005 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6006 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6009 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6012 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6013 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6014 strlen (token_buffer))
6015 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6016 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6021 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6022 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6026 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6029 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6030 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6031 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6032 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6038 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6039 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6044 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6045 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6046 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6047 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6048 declaration looks like this:
6061 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6066 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6067 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6072 @node Token Locations
6073 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6076 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6077 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6078 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6079 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6080 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6081 data in that variable.
6083 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6084 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6085 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6086 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6087 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6090 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6093 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6095 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6096 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6097 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6098 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6099 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6100 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6105 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6108 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6109 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6114 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6115 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6116 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6119 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6120 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6121 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6122 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6124 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6126 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6127 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6128 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6131 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6133 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6134 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6135 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6136 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6137 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6143 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6144 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6145 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6149 results in the following signature:
6152 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6153 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6156 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6159 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6160 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6164 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6167 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6168 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6169 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6172 @node Error Reporting
6173 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6174 @cindex error reporting function
6177 @cindex syntax error
6179 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6180 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6181 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6182 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6185 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6186 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6187 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6188 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6189 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6191 @findex %define parse.error
6192 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6193 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6194 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6195 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6196 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6198 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6199 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6200 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6201 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6202 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6203 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6205 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6206 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6207 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6209 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6214 yyerror (char const *s)
6218 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6223 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6224 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6225 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6226 immediately return 1.
6228 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6229 an access to the current location.
6230 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6231 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6232 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6236 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6237 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6240 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6243 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6244 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6247 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6248 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6249 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6250 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6254 /* Location tracking. */
6258 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6260 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6261 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6265 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6268 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6269 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6270 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6271 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6276 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6277 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6278 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6279 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6280 message is always passed last.
6282 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6283 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6284 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6288 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6289 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6290 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6291 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6293 @node Action Features
6294 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6295 @cindex summary, action features
6296 @cindex action features summary
6298 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6299 are useful in actions.
6301 @deffn {Variable} $$
6302 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6303 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6306 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6307 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6308 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6311 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6312 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6313 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6314 Types of Values in Actions}.
6317 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6318 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6319 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6320 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6323 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6324 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6325 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6328 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6329 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6330 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6333 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6335 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6336 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6337 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6338 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6339 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6340 going to be reduced by this rule.
6342 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6343 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6344 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6347 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6350 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6352 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6355 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6357 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6361 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6363 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6364 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6365 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6366 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6367 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6370 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6371 @findex YYRECOVERING
6372 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6373 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6374 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6377 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6378 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6379 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6380 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6381 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6383 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6386 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6387 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6389 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6391 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6394 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6395 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6396 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6397 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6400 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6401 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6402 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6403 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6405 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6408 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6409 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6410 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6411 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6413 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6418 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6419 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6422 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6426 @c int first_line, last_line;
6427 @c int first_column, last_column;
6431 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6432 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6434 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6435 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6436 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6439 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6442 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6444 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6445 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6449 @node Internationalization
6450 @section Parser Internationalization
6451 @cindex internationalization
6457 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6458 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6459 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6460 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6461 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6462 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6463 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6464 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6467 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6468 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6469 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6474 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6475 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6476 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6477 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6478 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6482 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6487 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6488 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6489 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6490 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6491 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6492 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6493 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6494 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6495 Bison-generated parser.
6498 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6499 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6500 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6504 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6507 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6508 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6509 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6513 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6514 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6515 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6518 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6524 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6528 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6534 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6535 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6536 @cindex algorithm of parser
6539 @cindex parser stack
6540 @cindex stack, parser
6542 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6543 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6544 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6546 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6547 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6550 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6551 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6552 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6553 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6554 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6555 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6556 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6558 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6565 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6566 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6569 expr: expr '*' expr;
6573 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6580 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6581 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6583 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6584 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6585 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6587 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6590 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6591 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6592 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6593 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6594 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6595 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6596 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6597 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6598 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6599 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6603 @section Lookahead Tokens
6604 @cindex lookahead token
6606 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6607 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6608 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6609 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6610 token in order to decide what to do.
6612 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6613 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6614 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6615 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6616 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6617 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6618 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6621 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6622 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6623 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6640 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6641 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6642 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6643 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6644 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6646 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6647 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6648 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6649 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6650 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6651 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6656 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6657 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6658 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6659 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6662 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6664 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6665 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6666 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6668 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6669 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6675 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6681 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6682 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6684 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6685 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6686 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6687 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6690 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6691 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6692 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6693 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6694 contrast it with the other alternative.
6696 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6697 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6701 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6703 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6706 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6707 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6708 making these two inputs equivalent:
6711 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6713 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6716 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6717 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6718 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6719 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6720 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6721 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6722 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6723 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6725 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6726 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6727 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6728 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6730 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6732 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6733 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6734 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6739 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6751 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6760 @section Operator Precedence
6761 @cindex operator precedence
6762 @cindex precedence of operators
6764 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6765 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6766 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6767 shift and when to reduce.
6770 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6771 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
6772 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
6773 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6774 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6777 @node Why Precedence
6778 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6780 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6781 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6795 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6796 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6797 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6798 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6799 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6800 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6801 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6804 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6805 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6806 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6807 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6808 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6809 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6810 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6811 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6814 @cindex associativity
6815 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6816 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6817 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6818 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6819 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6820 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6821 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6822 makes right-associativity.
6824 @node Using Precedence
6825 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6831 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6832 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6833 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6834 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6835 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6836 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6837 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6839 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
6840 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
6841 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
6842 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
6843 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
6844 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
6845 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
6846 what expected the grammar author.
6848 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6849 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
6850 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6851 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6852 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6854 @node Precedence Only
6855 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
6858 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
6859 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
6860 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
6861 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
6862 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
6863 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
6864 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
6866 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
6867 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
6868 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
6872 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
6875 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
6876 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
6877 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
6878 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
6879 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
6880 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
6881 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
6888 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
6889 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
6890 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
6891 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
6892 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
6893 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
6894 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
6896 @node Precedence Examples
6897 @subsection Precedence Examples
6899 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6907 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6908 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6909 declared with @code{'-'}:
6912 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6918 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6919 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6920 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6922 @node How Precedence
6923 @subsection How Precedence Works
6925 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6926 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6927 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6928 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6929 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6930 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6932 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6933 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6934 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6935 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6936 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6937 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6938 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6941 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6942 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6944 @node Contextual Precedence
6945 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6946 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6947 @cindex unary operator precedence
6948 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6949 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6952 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6953 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6954 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6955 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6957 The Bison precedence declarations
6958 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6959 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6960 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6963 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6964 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6965 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6966 modifier's syntax is:
6969 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6973 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6974 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6975 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6976 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6977 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6979 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6980 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6981 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6991 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6998 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7003 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7004 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7005 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7006 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7008 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7009 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7010 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7011 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7013 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7014 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7015 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7016 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7017 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7018 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7020 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7021 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7025 @section Parser States
7026 @cindex finite-state machine
7027 @cindex parser state
7028 @cindex state (of parser)
7030 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7031 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7032 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7033 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7034 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7036 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7037 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7038 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7039 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7040 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7041 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7042 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7043 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7046 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7047 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7048 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7051 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7052 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7053 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7055 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7056 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7059 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7060 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7064 sequence: /* empty */
7065 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7068 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7073 maybeword: /* empty */
7074 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7076 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7082 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7083 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7084 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7085 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7086 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7087 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7089 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7090 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7091 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7093 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7094 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7095 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7096 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7097 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7099 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7100 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7101 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7102 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7105 sequence: /* empty */
7106 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7108 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7112 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7115 sequence: /* empty */
7117 | sequence redirects
7124 redirects:/* empty */
7125 | redirects redirect
7130 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7131 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7132 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7133 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7134 in infinitely many ways!
7136 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7137 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7138 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7139 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7141 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7145 sequence: /* empty */
7151 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7156 sequence: /* empty */
7158 | sequence redirects
7170 | redirects redirect
7175 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7176 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7177 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7179 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7187 def: param_spec return_spec ','
7191 | name_list ':' type
7209 | name ',' name_list
7214 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7215 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7216 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7217 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7221 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7223 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7224 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7225 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7227 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7228 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7229 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7230 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7231 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7232 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7233 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7236 @cindex canonical LR
7237 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7238 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7239 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7240 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7241 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7242 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7243 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7244 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7246 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7247 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7248 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7249 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7250 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7261 /* This rule is never used. */
7267 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7268 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7269 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7270 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7271 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7272 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7274 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7275 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7276 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7277 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7278 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7279 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7284 | name_list ':' type
7292 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7293 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7298 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7299 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7300 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7301 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7302 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7303 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7304 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7306 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7307 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7308 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7309 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7311 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7312 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7315 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7316 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7317 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7318 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7321 @node LR Table Construction
7322 @subsection LR Table Construction
7323 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7326 @cindex canonical LR
7327 @findex %define lr.type
7329 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7330 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7331 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7332 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7335 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7336 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7337 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7338 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7341 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7342 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7343 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7346 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7347 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7348 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7351 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7353 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7356 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7360 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7364 %define lr.type ielr
7367 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7368 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7369 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7370 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7371 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7372 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7373 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7374 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7375 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7376 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7378 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7379 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7380 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7381 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7387 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7390 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7392 @cindex GLR with LALR
7393 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7394 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7395 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7396 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7397 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7398 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7399 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7400 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7401 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7402 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7404 @item Malformed grammars.
7406 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7407 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7408 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7409 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7410 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7415 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7416 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7417 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7418 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7419 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7420 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7421 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7422 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7423 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7427 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7430 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7431 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7432 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7433 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7434 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7435 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7436 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7437 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7438 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7439 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7440 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7441 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7444 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7445 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7446 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7448 @node Default Reductions
7449 @subsection Default Reductions
7450 @cindex default reductions
7451 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7454 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7455 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7456 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7457 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7458 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7460 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7461 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7464 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7466 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7467 @cindex consistent states
7468 @cindex defaulted states
7469 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7470 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7471 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7472 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7473 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7474 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7475 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7476 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7477 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7478 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7479 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7481 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7482 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7483 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7484 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7485 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7486 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7487 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7488 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7489 should already be considered closed.
7491 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7493 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7494 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7495 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7496 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7497 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7498 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7499 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7500 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7501 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7505 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7506 @c sentence from being rejected.
7507 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7508 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7509 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7510 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7511 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7512 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7515 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7516 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7517 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7518 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7519 because the accept action ends the parse.
7521 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7522 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7523 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7524 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7525 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7526 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7527 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7528 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7529 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7530 split the parse instead.
7532 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7533 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7535 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7536 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7537 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7539 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7540 @item @code{consistent}
7541 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7544 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7545 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7550 @findex %define parse.lac
7552 @cindex lookahead correction
7554 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7555 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7556 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7557 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7558 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7559 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7560 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7561 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7562 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7564 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7565 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7566 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7567 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7568 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7570 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7571 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7572 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7573 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7575 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7576 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7578 @item @code{none} (default)
7581 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7582 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7586 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7587 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7588 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7589 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7590 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7591 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7592 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7593 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7594 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7595 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7598 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7599 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7600 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7601 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7602 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7603 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7604 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7605 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7606 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7607 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7609 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7610 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7611 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7612 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7613 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7614 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7615 language-recognition power.
7617 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7620 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7622 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7623 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7624 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7625 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7628 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7630 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7631 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7632 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7633 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7634 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7635 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7639 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7640 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7641 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7642 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7643 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7644 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7645 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7646 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7647 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7648 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7649 has proven insignificant for practical grammars.
7652 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7653 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7654 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7656 @node Unreachable States
7657 @subsection Unreachable States
7658 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7659 @cindex unreachable states
7661 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7662 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7663 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7664 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7666 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7667 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7668 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7669 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7671 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7672 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7673 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7676 There are a few caveats to consider:
7679 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7681 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7682 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7683 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7684 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7685 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7686 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7688 @item Other useless states.
7690 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7691 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7692 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7693 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7694 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7695 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7696 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7699 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7700 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7702 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7703 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7704 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7706 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7707 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7708 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7709 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7710 context-free languages.
7711 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7712 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7713 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7714 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7715 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7716 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7717 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7718 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7720 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7721 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7722 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7723 parser uses the same basic
7724 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7725 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7726 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7727 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7729 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7730 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7731 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7732 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7733 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7735 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7736 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7737 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7738 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7739 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7740 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7741 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7742 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7743 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7744 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7745 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7748 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7749 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7750 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7751 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7752 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7753 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7754 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7755 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7756 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7757 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7758 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7759 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7761 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7762 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7763 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7765 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7766 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7767 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7768 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7769 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7770 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7771 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7772 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7773 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7774 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7775 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7776 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7778 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7781 @node Memory Management
7782 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7783 @cindex memory exhaustion
7784 @cindex memory management
7785 @cindex stack overflow
7786 @cindex parser stack overflow
7787 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7789 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7790 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7791 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7793 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7794 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7795 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7798 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7799 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7800 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7801 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7803 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7804 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7805 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7806 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7807 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7808 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7810 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7811 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7812 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7815 @cindex default stack limit
7816 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7820 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7821 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7822 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7823 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7824 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7826 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7828 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
7829 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
7830 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
7831 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
7832 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
7833 non-trivial copy constructors.
7834 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
7837 @node Error Recovery
7838 @chapter Error Recovery
7839 @cindex error recovery
7840 @cindex recovery from errors
7842 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7843 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7844 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7847 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7848 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7849 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7850 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7851 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7852 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7853 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7856 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7857 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7858 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7859 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7860 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7861 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7866 stmnts: /* empty string */
7872 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7873 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7875 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7876 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7877 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7878 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7879 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7880 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7881 applicable in the ordinary way.
7883 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7884 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7885 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7886 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7887 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7888 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7889 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7890 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7891 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7892 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7893 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7894 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7896 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7897 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7898 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7901 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7904 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7905 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7906 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7907 spurious error message:
7910 primary: '(' expr ')'
7916 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7917 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7918 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7919 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7920 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7921 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7922 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7925 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7926 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7927 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7928 error messages resume.
7930 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7931 as any other rules can.
7934 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7935 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7936 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7937 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7940 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7941 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7942 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7944 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7946 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7947 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7948 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7949 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7950 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7952 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7953 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7954 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7955 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7958 @node Context Dependency
7959 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7961 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7962 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7963 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7964 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7968 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7969 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7970 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7971 error recovery rules must be written.
7974 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7975 neither clean nor robust.)
7977 @node Semantic Tokens
7978 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7980 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7981 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7987 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7988 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7989 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7991 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7992 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7993 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7994 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7995 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7997 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7998 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7999 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8000 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8001 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8002 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8003 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8005 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8006 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8007 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8008 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8012 typedef int foo, bar;
8016 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8017 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8023 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8024 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8026 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8027 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8028 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8029 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8030 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8035 declarator maybeasm '='
8037 | declarator maybeasm
8043 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
8045 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8051 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8052 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8053 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8055 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8056 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8057 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8058 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8059 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8060 the syntactic context.
8062 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8063 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8064 @cindex lexical tie-in
8066 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8067 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8070 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8071 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8072 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8073 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8074 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8081 void yyerror (char const *);
8095 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8109 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8110 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8111 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8113 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8114 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8115 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8118 @node Tie-in Recovery
8119 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8121 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8122 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8124 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8125 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8126 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8127 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8131 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8138 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8139 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8140 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8141 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8142 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8144 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8146 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8147 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8148 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8160 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8161 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8162 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8163 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8165 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8166 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8167 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8168 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8169 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8170 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8173 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8176 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8178 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
8179 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
8180 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
8181 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
8182 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
8183 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
8186 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8187 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8191 @section Understanding Your Parser
8193 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8194 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8195 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8196 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8197 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8199 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8200 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
8201 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8202 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8203 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8204 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8205 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8207 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8224 @command{bison} reports:
8227 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8228 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8229 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8230 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8231 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8234 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8235 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8236 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8237 interpretation is the same.
8239 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
8240 to precedence and/or associativity:
8243 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
8244 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
8245 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
8250 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8253 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8254 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8255 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8256 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8260 @cindex token, useless
8261 @cindex useless token
8262 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8263 @cindex useless nonterminal
8264 @cindex rule, useless
8265 @cindex useless rule
8266 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
8267 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
8268 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
8269 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
8273 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
8276 Terminals unused in grammar:
8279 Rules useless in grammar:
8284 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
8290 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
8291 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
8292 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
8293 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
8294 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
8299 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8303 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8315 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8320 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8326 @cindex pointed rule
8327 @cindex rule, pointed
8328 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8329 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8330 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8331 the location of the input cursor.
8336 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8338 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8343 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8344 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8345 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8346 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8347 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8348 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8349 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8350 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8352 @cindex core, item set
8353 @cindex item set core
8354 @cindex kernel, item set
8355 @cindex item set core
8356 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8357 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8358 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8359 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8360 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8361 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8366 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8367 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
8368 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
8369 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
8370 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
8371 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
8373 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8384 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
8386 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8390 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8391 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8392 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8393 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8398 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
8399 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8400 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8401 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8402 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8404 $ shift, and go to state 3
8405 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8406 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8407 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8408 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8412 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8413 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8414 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8415 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp '+' . exp}.
8416 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8419 @cindex accepting state
8420 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8426 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
8432 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
8433 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
8435 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8441 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
8443 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8449 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
8451 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8457 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
8459 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8465 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
8467 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8472 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8478 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8479 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
8480 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8481 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8482 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8484 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8485 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8487 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8488 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8491 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8492 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8493 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8494 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8495 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8496 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8497 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8498 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8500 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8501 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8502 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
8505 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8506 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8507 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8508 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8509 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8510 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8511 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8512 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8513 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8514 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8515 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8516 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8521 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8522 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
8523 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8524 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8525 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8527 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8528 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8530 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8531 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8534 The remaining states are similar:
8540 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8541 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8542 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
8543 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8544 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8546 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8547 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8549 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8550 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8556 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8557 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8558 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8559 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
8560 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8562 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8564 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8565 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8571 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8572 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8573 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8574 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8575 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
8577 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8578 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8579 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8580 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8582 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8583 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8584 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8585 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8586 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8591 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8592 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8593 @samp{*}, but also because the
8594 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8598 @section Tracing Your Parser
8601 @cindex tracing the parser
8603 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8604 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8606 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8609 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8611 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8612 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8613 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8614 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8617 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8618 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8619 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8621 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8623 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8624 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
8625 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
8627 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
8628 @findex %define parse.trace
8629 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
8630 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
8631 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
8632 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
8633 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
8636 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
8639 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8640 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8641 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8642 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8643 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8644 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8646 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8647 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8648 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8649 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8651 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8652 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8653 messages tell you these things:
8657 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8660 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8661 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8664 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8665 of the state stack afterward.
8668 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8669 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8670 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8671 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8672 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8673 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8674 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8675 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8676 grammar are to blame.
8678 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8679 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8680 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8681 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8682 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8685 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8686 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8687 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8688 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8689 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8690 value (from @code{yylval}).
8692 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8693 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8697 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8698 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8701 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8704 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8707 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8708 else if (type == NUM)
8709 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8713 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8716 @chapter Invoking Bison
8717 @cindex invoking Bison
8718 @cindex Bison invocation
8719 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8721 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8727 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8728 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8729 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8730 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8731 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8732 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8733 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8734 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8735 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8736 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8737 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8742 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8745 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8748 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8751 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8753 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8754 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8755 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8758 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8759 in alphabetical order by short options.
8760 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8761 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8765 @section Bison Options
8767 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8768 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8769 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8770 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8771 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8774 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8775 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8778 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8784 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8788 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8790 @item --print-localedir
8791 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8793 @item --print-datadir
8794 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8798 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8799 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8800 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8801 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8802 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8803 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8804 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8805 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8806 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8807 for compatibility with POSIX:
8814 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8815 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8816 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8817 this option is specified.
8819 @item -W [@var{category}]
8820 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8821 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8824 @item midrule-values
8825 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8827 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8830 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8833 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8834 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8837 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8840 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8841 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8842 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8845 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8849 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8850 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8851 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8852 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8853 no effect on the conflict report.
8856 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8858 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8859 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8865 Turn off all the warnings.
8867 Treat warnings as errors.
8870 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8871 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8872 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8881 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8882 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8883 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8885 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8886 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8887 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8888 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8889 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8890 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8891 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8895 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8898 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8899 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8900 definition for @var{name}.
8902 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8903 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8904 definitions for @var{name}.
8906 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8907 definitions for @var{name}.
8910 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8911 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8912 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8914 @item -L @var{language}
8915 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8916 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8917 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8918 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8919 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8921 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8925 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8927 @item -p @var{prefix}
8928 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8929 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8930 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8934 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8935 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8936 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8937 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8938 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8939 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8942 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8943 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8944 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8946 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8947 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8948 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8949 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8951 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8952 file in the Bison installation directory.
8953 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8954 current working directory.
8955 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8958 @itemx --token-table
8959 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8966 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8967 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8968 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8969 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8972 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8973 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8974 with other short options.
8976 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8977 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8978 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8979 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8981 @item -r @var{things}
8982 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8983 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8984 separated list of @var{things} among:
8988 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8992 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8993 each rule's lookahead set.
8996 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8997 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9000 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9001 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9005 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9006 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9007 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9010 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9011 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9013 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9014 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9016 @item -g [@var{file}]
9017 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9018 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9019 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9020 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9021 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9022 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9025 @item -x [@var{file}]
9026 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9027 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9028 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9029 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9031 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9032 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9035 @node Option Cross Key
9036 @section Option Cross Key
9038 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9039 the corresponding short option and directive.
9041 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9042 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9043 @include cross-options.texi
9047 @section Yacc Library
9049 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9050 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9051 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9052 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9053 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9054 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9055 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9057 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9058 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9061 int yyerror (char const *);
9064 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9065 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9066 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9072 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9074 @node Other Languages
9075 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9078 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9079 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9083 @section C++ Parsers
9086 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9087 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9088 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9089 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9090 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9091 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9094 @node C++ Bison Interface
9095 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9096 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9100 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9101 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9102 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9103 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9105 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9107 @findex %define api.namespace
9108 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
9109 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
9110 in the following files:
9115 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
9116 used for location tracking when enabled. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9119 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9122 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9123 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9124 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9125 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9126 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9128 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9129 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9130 @samp{%defines} directive.
9133 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9134 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9136 @node C++ Semantic Values
9137 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9138 @c - No objects in unions
9140 @c - Printer and destructor
9142 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
9143 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
9144 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
9145 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
9148 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
9149 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
9153 @subsubsection C++ Unions
9155 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9156 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9157 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9160 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9161 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9162 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9164 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9165 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9166 to such objects are allowed.
9169 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9170 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9171 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9175 @subsubsection C++ Variants
9177 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
9178 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
9179 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
9180 types can be used without pointers.
9182 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
9183 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
9184 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
9185 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
9187 For instance, instead of
9195 %token <ival> NUMBER;
9196 %token <sval> STRING;
9203 %token <int> NUMBER;
9204 %token <std::string> STRING;
9207 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
9208 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
9211 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
9212 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
9213 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
9215 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
9216 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
9217 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
9218 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
9219 eventually, destroyed.
9221 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
9222 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
9223 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
9226 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
9227 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
9231 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
9232 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
9233 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
9234 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
9235 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
9236 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
9237 that would be duplicating the information.
9239 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
9240 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
9241 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
9242 (the current implementation of) variants:
9245 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
9246 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
9247 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
9248 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
9249 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
9250 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
9253 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
9254 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
9255 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
9256 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
9257 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
9258 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
9261 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
9264 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
9265 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
9267 @node C++ Location Values
9268 @subsection C++ Location Values
9272 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9274 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9275 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
9276 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
9277 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
9280 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
9281 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9282 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9283 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9284 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9287 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
9288 The line, starting at 1.
9291 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9292 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9295 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
9296 The column, starting at 0.
9299 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9300 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9303 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9304 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9305 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9306 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9307 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9310 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9311 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9312 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9313 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9316 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
9317 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
9318 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9321 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9322 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9323 Advance the @code{end} position.
9326 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
9327 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
9328 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
9329 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9332 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9333 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9337 @node C++ Parser Interface
9338 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9339 @c - define parser_class_name
9341 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9343 @c - Reporting errors
9345 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9346 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9347 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9348 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9349 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9350 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9351 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9352 additional argument for its constructor.
9354 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9355 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9356 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
9359 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9360 A structure that contains (only) the definition of the tokens as the
9361 @code{yytokentype} enumeration. To refer to the token @code{FOO}, the
9362 scanner should use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9363 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9364 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9367 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
9368 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
9369 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
9370 equivalent with first
9371 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
9372 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
9373 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
9374 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
9375 function invoked from the user action.
9378 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9379 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9380 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9383 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9384 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
9385 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
9388 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9389 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9392 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9393 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9394 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9398 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9399 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9400 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9401 or nonzero, full tracing.
9404 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9405 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
9406 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9407 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9408 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
9413 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9414 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9415 @c - prefix for yylex.
9416 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9419 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9420 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9421 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
9422 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
9425 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
9426 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
9430 @subsubsection Split Symbols
9432 Therefore the interface is as follows.
9434 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9435 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9436 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
9437 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9438 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9441 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
9442 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
9444 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
9448 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
9449 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9452 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
9453 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9457 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
9458 initialized. So the code would look like:
9462 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
9463 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9466 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
9467 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9476 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
9477 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9480 yylval.build(yytext);
9481 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9486 @node Complete Symbols
9487 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
9489 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and @code{%define lex_symbol},
9490 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
9491 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
9492 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
9493 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
9495 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9496 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
9497 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
9501 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
9502 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
9503 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
9504 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
9506 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
9508 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9509 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
9510 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
9511 including the @code{api.tokens.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
9512 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
9513 also pass the @var{location}.
9516 For instance, given the following declarations:
9519 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9520 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
9521 %token <int> INTEGER;
9526 Bison generates the following functions:
9529 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
9530 const location_type& l);
9531 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
9532 const location_type& loc);
9533 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
9537 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
9540 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
9541 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
9542 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
9545 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
9546 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
9548 @node A Complete C++ Example
9549 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9551 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9552 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9553 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9554 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9555 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9556 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9557 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
9558 actually easier to interface with.
9561 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9562 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9563 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9564 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9565 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9568 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9569 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9571 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9572 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9573 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9574 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9575 of valid input follows.
9579 seven := one + two * three
9583 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9584 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9586 @c - A place to store error messages
9587 @c - A place for the result
9589 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9590 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9591 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9592 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9593 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9594 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9595 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9597 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9598 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9599 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9602 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9604 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9605 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9608 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9613 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9614 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9615 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9616 factor both as follows.
9618 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9620 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9622 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
9623 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9628 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9631 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9633 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9638 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9640 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9646 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
9647 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
9649 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9651 // Handling the scanner.
9654 bool trace_scanning;
9658 Similarly for the parser itself.
9660 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9662 // Run the parser on file F.
9663 // Return 0 on success.
9664 int parse (const std::string& f);
9665 // The name of the file being parsed.
9666 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
9668 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
9673 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9674 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9675 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9676 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9678 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9681 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9682 void error (const std::string& m);
9684 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9687 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9688 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9689 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9690 messages and set error state.
9692 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9694 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9695 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9697 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9698 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9700 variables["one"] = 1;
9701 variables["two"] = 2;
9704 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9709 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9713 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9714 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9715 int res = parser.parse ();
9721 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9723 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9727 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9729 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9734 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9736 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9737 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9738 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9739 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9742 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9744 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9745 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9747 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9751 @findex %define variant
9752 @findex %define lex_symbol
9753 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
9754 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
9755 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
9756 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{lex_symbol}.
9758 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9761 %define parse.assert
9766 @findex %code requires
9767 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
9768 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
9769 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
9770 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
9771 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9772 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
9773 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
9775 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9780 class calcxx_driver;
9785 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9786 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9789 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9791 // The parsing context.
9792 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9796 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
9797 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9798 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9801 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9806 // Initialize the initial location.
9807 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9812 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9813 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9816 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9819 %define parse.error verbose
9824 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9825 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9827 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9831 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9837 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9838 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
9839 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
9840 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
9841 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.tokens.prefix}).
9843 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9845 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9859 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
9860 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
9863 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9865 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9866 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
9871 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
9872 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
9873 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
9876 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9877 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9879 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <*>;
9883 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
9884 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
9886 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9890 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9893 assignments assignment @{@}
9894 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
9897 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
9902 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9903 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9904 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9905 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9906 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
9907 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
9908 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
9913 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9916 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9919 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
9920 const std::string& m)
9922 driver.error (l, m);
9926 @node Calc++ Scanner
9927 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9929 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9930 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9932 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9934 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9939 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9940 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9942 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9943 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9944 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9945 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
9949 // The location of the current token.
9950 static yy::location loc;
9955 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9956 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9957 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9958 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
9960 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9962 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9966 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9968 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9970 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9976 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9977 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9978 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
9979 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
9980 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9981 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9982 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9984 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9988 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
9989 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
9995 // Code run each time yylex is called.
9999 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
10000 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
10004 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
10006 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10008 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
10009 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
10010 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
10011 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
10012 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
10013 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
10014 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
10019 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10020 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10021 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
10022 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
10025 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10026 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
10027 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
10032 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
10033 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10035 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10039 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10041 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10044 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10046 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10047 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10054 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10061 @node Calc++ Top Level
10062 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10064 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10066 @comment file: calc++.cc
10068 #include <iostream>
10069 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10073 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10076 calcxx_driver driver;
10077 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
10078 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
10079 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10080 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
10081 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10082 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
10083 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10092 @section Java Parsers
10095 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10096 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10097 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10098 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10099 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10100 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10101 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10102 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10105 @node Java Bison Interface
10106 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10107 @c - %language "Java"
10109 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10110 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10112 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10113 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10115 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10116 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10117 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10118 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10119 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10120 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10121 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10122 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10123 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10124 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10126 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10128 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10129 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10130 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10131 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10134 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10135 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10137 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10138 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10140 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10141 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10143 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10144 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
10145 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
10147 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10148 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10149 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
10151 if needed. Also, in the future the
10152 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10153 access the token names and codes.
10155 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
10156 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
10157 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
10158 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
10161 @node Java Semantic Values
10162 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10163 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10165 @c - Printer and destructor
10167 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10168 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10169 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10172 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10173 %type <Integer> number
10176 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10177 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10178 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10179 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
10180 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10183 %define stype "ASTNode"
10187 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10188 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10190 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10191 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10192 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10193 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10194 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10195 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10197 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10198 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10199 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10201 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10202 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10203 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10206 @node Java Location Values
10207 @subsection Java Location Values
10209 @c - class Position
10210 @c - class Location
10212 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10213 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10214 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10215 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10216 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10217 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10218 renamed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
10220 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10221 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10222 with @samp{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10223 be supplied by the user.
10226 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10227 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10228 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10231 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10232 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10235 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10236 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10239 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10240 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10241 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10242 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10246 @node Java Parser Interface
10247 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10248 @c - define parser_class_name
10250 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10252 @c - Reporting errors
10254 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10255 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10256 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10257 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10258 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10260 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10261 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10262 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10263 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10264 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10265 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10266 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
10267 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
10269 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10270 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10271 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10272 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
10274 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10275 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10276 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10277 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10278 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10279 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10281 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10282 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10283 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10284 which initialize them automatically.
10286 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10287 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10288 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
10289 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
10291 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10292 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
10293 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10296 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10297 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10298 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
10301 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10302 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10303 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
10305 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10306 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
10307 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncatch exceptions.
10310 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10311 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10312 @code{false} otherwise.
10315 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
10316 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
10317 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
10318 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
10319 verbose error messages.
10322 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10323 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
10324 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10325 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10326 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10327 available only if location tracking is active.
10330 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10331 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10332 from a syntax error.
10333 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10336 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10337 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10338 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10342 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10343 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10344 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10345 or nonzero, full tracing.
10348 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
10349 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
10350 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
10354 @node Java Scanner Interface
10355 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10358 @c - Lexer interface
10360 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10361 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10362 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10363 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
10364 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
10367 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10368 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10369 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10370 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10373 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10374 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10375 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10376 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10379 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10381 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10382 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10383 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10384 changed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
10387 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10388 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10389 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10392 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10393 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10396 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10397 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10398 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10399 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10400 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10402 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define position_type
10403 "@var{class-name}".}
10406 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10407 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10409 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
10410 "@var{class-name}".}
10414 @node Java Action Features
10415 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10417 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10418 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10420 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10421 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10424 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10425 This may not be assigned to.
10426 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10429 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10430 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10431 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10435 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10436 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10437 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10438 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10439 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10440 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10443 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10444 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10445 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10446 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10448 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10452 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10453 This may not be assigned to.
10454 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10458 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10459 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10462 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
10463 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10464 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10467 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
10468 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10469 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10472 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
10473 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
10474 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10477 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10478 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10479 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10481 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10484 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10485 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10486 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10487 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10488 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10489 available only if location tracking is active.
10493 @node Java Differences
10494 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10496 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10497 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10498 section summarizes these differences.
10502 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10503 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10504 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10505 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10506 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10507 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10508 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10510 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10511 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10512 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10513 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10514 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10517 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10518 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10519 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10520 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10521 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10522 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10523 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10524 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
10525 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10528 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10530 @item @code{%code imports}
10531 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10532 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10533 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
10535 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10536 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10538 @item @code{%code lexer}
10539 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10540 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10541 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
10545 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10546 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10547 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10549 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10550 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10555 @node Java Declarations Summary
10556 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10558 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10559 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10561 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10562 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10565 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10566 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10567 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10568 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10569 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10572 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10573 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10574 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10575 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10578 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10579 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10580 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10581 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10584 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10585 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10586 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10589 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10590 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10591 a Java @emph{type}.
10592 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10595 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10596 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10597 @xref{Java Differences}.
10600 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10601 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10602 @xref{Java Differences}.
10605 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10606 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
10607 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10610 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10611 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10612 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10615 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10616 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10617 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10618 @xref{Java Differences}.
10621 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10622 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
10623 @xref{Java Differences}.
10626 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10627 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10628 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10631 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
10632 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
10633 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10636 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10637 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10638 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10641 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10642 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10643 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10646 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10647 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10649 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10652 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10653 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
10654 constructor. Default is none.
10655 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10658 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10659 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10660 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10661 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10664 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10665 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10666 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10667 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10668 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10671 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10672 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10673 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10676 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10677 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10678 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10679 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10682 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10683 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10684 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10685 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10688 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10689 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10690 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10693 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10694 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10695 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10698 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10699 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10700 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10703 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10704 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10705 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10706 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10710 @c ================================================= FAQ
10713 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10714 @cindex frequently asked questions
10717 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10721 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10722 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10723 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10724 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10725 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10726 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10727 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10728 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10729 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10730 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10731 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10732 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10735 @node Memory Exhausted
10736 @section Memory Exhausted
10739 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10740 message. What can I do?
10743 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10746 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10747 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10749 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10750 following typical questions:
10753 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10754 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10755 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10762 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10763 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10764 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10767 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10768 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10769 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10770 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10771 @file{first-line.l}:
10777 #include <stdlib.h>
10781 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10785 yyparse (char const *file)
10787 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10791 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10795 /* One token only. */
10797 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10800 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10818 If the file @file{input} contains
10826 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10829 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10830 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10831 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10836 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10837 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10838 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10839 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10840 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10841 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10842 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10843 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10846 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10847 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10848 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10849 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10851 @node Strings are Destroyed
10852 @section Strings are Destroyed
10855 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10856 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10857 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10860 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10861 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10862 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10868 char *yylval = NULL;
10873 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10881 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10882 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10883 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10884 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10890 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10893 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10894 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10895 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10901 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10902 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10903 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10904 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10905 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10906 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10909 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10910 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10911 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10916 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10917 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10920 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10921 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10924 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10925 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10926 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10927 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10928 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10929 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10930 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10932 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10934 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10935 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10936 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10937 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10938 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10939 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10942 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10943 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10946 @node Multiple start-symbols
10947 @section Multiple start-symbols
10950 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10951 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10952 multiple entry points.
10955 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10956 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10957 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10958 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10962 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10964 start: START_FOO foo
10968 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10969 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10971 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10972 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10973 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10974 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10975 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10976 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10977 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10978 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10981 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10986 int t = start_token;
10991 /* @r{The rules.} */
10995 @node Secure? Conform?
10996 @section Secure? Conform?
10999 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11002 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11003 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11004 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11005 please send us a bug report.
11007 @node I can't build Bison
11008 @section I can't build Bison
11011 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11012 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11016 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11017 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11018 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11019 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11020 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11021 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11022 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11025 @node Where can I find help?
11026 @section Where can I find help?
11029 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11032 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11033 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11034 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11035 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11036 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11037 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11038 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11039 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11043 @section Bug Reports
11046 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11049 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11050 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11051 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11052 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11053 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11055 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11056 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11057 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11058 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11059 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11061 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11062 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11063 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11064 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11065 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11066 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11068 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11069 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11071 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11073 @node More Languages
11074 @section More Languages
11077 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11078 favorite language here}?
11081 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11082 languages; contributions are welcome.
11085 @section Beta Testing
11088 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11091 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11092 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11093 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11094 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11095 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11096 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11097 essentially halted.
11099 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11100 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11101 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11102 systems are especially welcome.
11104 @node Mailing Lists
11105 @section Mailing Lists
11108 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11111 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11113 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11115 @node Table of Symbols
11116 @appendix Bison Symbols
11117 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11118 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11120 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11121 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11122 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11125 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11126 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11127 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11130 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11131 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11135 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11136 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11140 @deffn {Variable} $$
11141 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11145 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11146 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11147 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11150 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11151 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11155 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11156 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11160 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11161 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11162 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11163 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11166 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11167 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11168 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11169 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11170 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11174 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
11175 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
11176 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
11177 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
11178 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
11179 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
11180 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
11182 This feature is experimental.
11183 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11187 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11188 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11191 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11192 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11196 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11197 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11200 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11201 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11202 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11205 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11206 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11209 This feature is experimental.
11210 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11213 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11216 @deffn {Directive} <>
11217 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11220 This feature is experimental.
11221 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11224 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11227 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11228 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11229 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11230 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11233 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11234 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11235 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11236 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11237 @xref{%code Summary}.
11240 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11241 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11245 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11246 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11247 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11252 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11253 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11254 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11255 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11258 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11259 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11260 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11263 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11264 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11265 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11268 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11269 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11270 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11273 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11274 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11275 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11279 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11280 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11281 used in the grammar.
11284 @deffn {Symbol} error
11285 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11286 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11287 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11288 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11289 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11290 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11291 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11292 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11295 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11296 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
11297 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11300 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11301 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11305 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11306 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11307 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11310 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11311 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11314 @deffn {Directive} %language
11315 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11316 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11319 @deffn {Directive} %left
11320 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
11321 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11324 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11325 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
11326 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11330 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11331 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11332 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11333 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11334 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11337 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11338 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11342 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11343 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11344 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11349 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11350 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11351 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11354 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11355 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
11356 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11359 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11360 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11361 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11364 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11365 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
11366 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
11367 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11370 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11371 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
11372 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11375 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11376 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11377 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11380 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
11381 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
11382 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11385 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11386 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11387 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11388 unreasonable usage.
11391 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11392 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11393 Require a Version of Bison}.
11396 @deffn {Directive} %right
11397 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
11398 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11401 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11402 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11403 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11406 @deffn {Directive} %start
11407 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11411 @deffn {Directive} %token
11412 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11413 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11416 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11417 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11418 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11421 @deffn {Directive} %type
11422 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11423 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11426 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11427 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11428 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11432 @deffn {Directive} %union
11433 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11434 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11437 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11438 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11439 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11440 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11441 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11443 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11447 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11448 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11449 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11450 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11452 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11456 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11457 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11458 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11461 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11462 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11463 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11464 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11465 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11468 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11469 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11470 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11473 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11474 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11475 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11478 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11479 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11480 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11481 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11484 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11485 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11486 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11489 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11490 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
11491 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
11492 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
11493 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11495 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11499 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11500 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11501 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11504 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11505 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
11506 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
11507 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
11508 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
11509 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
11510 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11513 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11514 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11515 @xref{Memory Management}.
11518 @deffn {Function} yylex
11519 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11520 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11524 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11525 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11526 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11527 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11528 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11531 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11532 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11533 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11534 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11536 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11538 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11539 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11540 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11543 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11544 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11545 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11548 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11549 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11550 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11551 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11553 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11554 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11555 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11558 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11559 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11563 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11564 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11565 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11566 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11567 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11570 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11571 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11572 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11575 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11576 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11577 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11578 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11579 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11580 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11581 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11584 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11585 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11586 call this function to create a new parser.
11587 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11588 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11589 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11590 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11593 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11594 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11595 parse the rest of the input stream.
11596 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11597 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11598 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11599 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11602 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11603 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11604 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11605 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11606 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11607 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11610 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11611 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11612 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11613 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11614 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11617 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11618 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11619 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11620 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11623 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11624 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11625 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11626 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11627 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11628 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11629 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11631 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11632 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11633 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11634 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11635 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11636 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11637 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11640 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11641 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11642 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11650 @item Accepting state
11651 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11652 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11653 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11655 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11656 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11657 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11658 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11659 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11661 @item Consistent state
11662 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11664 @item Context-free grammars
11665 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11666 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11667 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11668 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11671 @item Default reduction
11672 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11673 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11674 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11675 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11678 @item Defaulted state
11679 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11681 @item Dynamic allocation
11682 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11683 compile time or on entry to a function.
11686 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11687 character string of length zero.
11689 @item Finite-state stack machine
11690 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11691 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11692 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11693 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11694 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11695 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11697 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11698 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11699 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11700 deterministic parsing
11701 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11702 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11703 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11707 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11708 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11709 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11711 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11712 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11713 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11714 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11715 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11716 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11717 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11718 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11719 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11720 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11722 @item Infix operator
11723 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11724 performs some operation.
11727 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11729 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11730 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11731 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11732 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11733 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11734 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11735 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11737 @item Language construct
11738 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11739 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11740 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11742 @item Left associativity
11743 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11744 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11745 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11747 @item Left recursion
11748 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11749 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11752 @item Left-to-right parsing
11753 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11754 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11756 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11757 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11758 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11760 @item Lexical tie-in
11761 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11762 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11764 @item Literal string token
11765 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11767 @item Lookahead token
11768 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11772 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11773 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11774 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11777 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11778 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11780 @item Nonterminal symbol
11781 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11782 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11783 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11786 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11787 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11790 @item Postfix operator
11791 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11792 performs some operation.
11795 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11796 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11800 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11801 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11802 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11804 @item Reverse polish notation
11805 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11807 @item Right recursion
11808 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11809 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11813 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11814 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11815 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11818 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11819 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11820 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11822 @item Single-character literal
11823 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11824 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11827 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11828 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11829 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11830 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11833 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11834 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11835 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11838 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11839 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11842 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11843 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11844 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11845 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11847 @item Terminal symbol
11848 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11849 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11850 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11852 @item Unreachable state
11853 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11854 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11855 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11858 @node Copying This Manual
11859 @appendix Copying This Manual
11863 @unnumbered Bibliography
11867 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11868 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11869 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11870 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11872 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11873 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11874 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11875 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11876 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11878 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11879 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11880 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11881 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11882 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11884 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11885 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11886 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11887 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11888 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11891 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11892 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11893 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11896 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11897 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11898 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11899 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11909 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11910 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11911 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11912 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11913 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11914 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11915 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11916 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11917 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11918 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11919 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11920 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11921 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11922 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
11923 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11924 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11925 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11926 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11927 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11928 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11929 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11930 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11931 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11932 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
11933 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11934 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11935 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11936 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11937 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11938 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11939 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
11940 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
11941 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11942 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
11943 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11944 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11945 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11946 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
11947 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11948 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
11949 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11950 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11951 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11952 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11953 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
11954 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11955 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11956 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11957 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11958 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11959 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
11960 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
11962 @c Local Variables:
11963 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"