1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
227 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
228 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
229 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
230 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
231 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
232 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
234 Parser C-Language Interface
236 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
237 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
238 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
241 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
243 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
244 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
245 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
248 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
250 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
251 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
252 of the token it has read.
253 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
254 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
256 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
257 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
259 The Bison Parser Algorithm
261 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
262 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
263 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
264 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
265 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
266 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
267 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
268 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
269 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
270 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
274 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
275 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
276 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
277 * How Precedence:: How they work.
281 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
282 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
283 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
284 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
286 Handling Context Dependencies
288 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
289 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
290 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
291 error recovery rules must be written.
293 Debugging Your Parser
295 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
296 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
300 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
301 in alphabetical order by short options.
302 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
303 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
305 Parsers Written In Other Languages
307 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
308 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
312 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
313 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
314 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
315 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
316 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
317 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
319 A Complete C++ Example
321 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
322 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
323 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
324 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
325 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
329 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
330 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
331 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
332 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
333 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
334 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
335 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
336 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
338 Frequently Asked Questions
340 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
341 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
342 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
343 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
344 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
345 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
346 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
347 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
348 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
349 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
350 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
351 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
355 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
361 @unnumbered Introduction
364 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
365 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
366 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
367 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
368 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
369 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
370 calculators to complex programming languages.
372 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
373 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
374 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
375 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
376 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
379 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
380 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
381 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
382 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
385 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
386 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
387 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
388 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
389 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
390 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
393 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
396 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
398 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
399 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
400 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
401 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
402 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
404 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
406 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
407 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
408 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
409 License to all of the Bison source code.
411 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
412 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
413 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
414 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
415 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
416 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
417 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
419 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
420 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
421 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
422 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
423 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
424 using the other GNU tools.
426 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
427 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
428 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
429 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
433 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
434 @include gpl-3.0.texi
437 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
439 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
440 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
441 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
444 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
445 as mathematical ideas.
446 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
447 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
448 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
449 the name of an identifier, etc.).
450 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
451 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
452 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
453 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
454 how is the output used?
455 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
456 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
459 @node Language and Grammar
460 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
462 @cindex context-free grammar
463 @cindex grammar, context-free
464 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
465 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
466 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
467 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
468 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
469 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
470 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
471 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
475 @cindex Backus-Naur form
476 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
477 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
478 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
479 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
480 essentially machine-readable BNF.
482 @cindex LALR grammars
483 @cindex IELR grammars
485 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
486 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
487 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
488 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
489 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
490 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
491 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
492 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
493 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
494 Construction}, to learn how.
497 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
498 @cindex ambiguous grammars
499 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
501 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
502 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
503 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
504 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
505 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
506 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
507 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
508 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
509 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
510 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
511 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
512 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
513 possible parses of any given string is finite.
515 @cindex symbols (abstract)
517 @cindex syntactic grouping
518 @cindex grouping, syntactic
519 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
520 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
521 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
522 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
523 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
524 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
525 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
527 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
528 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
529 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
530 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
531 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
532 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
533 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
534 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
535 lexicography, not grammar.)
537 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
541 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
542 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
543 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
544 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
545 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
546 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
547 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
552 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
553 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
554 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
555 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
556 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
560 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
561 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
562 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
563 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
564 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
565 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
566 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
567 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
569 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
570 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
571 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
572 reads informally as follows:
575 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
580 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
584 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
585 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
586 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
587 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
590 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
591 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
592 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
593 not the start symbol.
595 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
596 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
597 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
598 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
599 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
600 reports a syntax error.
602 @node Grammar in Bison
603 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
604 @cindex Bison grammar
605 @cindex grammar, Bison
606 @cindex formal grammar
608 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
609 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
610 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
612 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
613 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
614 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
616 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
617 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
618 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
619 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
620 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
621 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
622 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
625 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
626 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
627 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
628 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
630 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
631 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
633 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
634 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
635 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
636 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
640 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
645 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
647 @node Semantic Values
648 @section Semantic Values
649 @cindex semantic value
650 @cindex value, semantic
652 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
653 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
654 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
655 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
656 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
659 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
660 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
661 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
662 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
663 ,Defining Language Semantics},
666 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
667 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
668 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
669 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
672 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
673 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
674 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
675 need to have any semantic value.)
677 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
678 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
679 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
680 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
681 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
682 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
684 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
685 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
686 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
687 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
688 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
690 @node Semantic Actions
691 @section Semantic Actions
692 @cindex semantic actions
693 @cindex actions, semantic
695 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
696 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
697 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
698 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
701 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
702 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
703 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
704 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
705 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
706 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
707 newly recognized larger expression.
709 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
713 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
718 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
719 from the values of the two subexpressions.
722 @section Writing GLR Parsers
724 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
727 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
728 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
730 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
731 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
732 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
733 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
734 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
735 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
736 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
737 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
738 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
740 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
741 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
742 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
743 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
744 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
745 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
746 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
747 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
748 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
749 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
750 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
751 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
752 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
753 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
754 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
755 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
756 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
757 identical set of symbols.
759 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
760 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
761 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
762 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
763 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
764 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
765 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
766 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
767 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
771 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
772 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
773 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
774 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
777 @node Simple GLR Parsers
778 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
779 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
780 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
784 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
785 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
787 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
788 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
789 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
791 Consider a problem that
792 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
793 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
796 type subrange = lo .. hi;
797 type enum = (a, b, c);
801 The original language standard allows only numeric
802 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
803 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
804 10206) and many other
805 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
806 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
810 type subrange = (a) .. b;
814 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
815 type with only one value:
822 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
823 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
825 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
826 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
827 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
828 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
829 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
830 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
831 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
832 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
834 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
835 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
836 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
837 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
840 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
841 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
842 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
843 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
844 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
845 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
848 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
849 use the GLR algorithm.
850 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
851 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
852 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
853 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
854 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
855 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
856 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
857 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
858 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
860 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
861 reports a syntax error as usual.
863 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
864 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
865 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
866 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
867 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
869 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
870 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
871 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
872 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
873 The present example contains only one conflict between two
874 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
875 cannot be nested. So the number of
876 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
877 and the parsing time is still linear.
879 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
880 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
883 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
893 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
898 type : '(' id_list ')'
920 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
921 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
922 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
923 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
930 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
931 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
932 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
941 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
942 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
943 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
944 notice when the parser splits.
946 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
947 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
948 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
949 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
950 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
951 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
952 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
953 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
954 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
955 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
956 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
957 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
958 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
961 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
962 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
963 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
964 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
965 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
966 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
968 @node Merging GLR Parses
969 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
970 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
971 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
975 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
977 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
982 #define YYSTYPE char const *
984 void yyerror (char const *);
997 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1000 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
1004 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1005 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1006 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1007 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1008 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1011 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1012 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1013 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1014 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1017 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1018 | '(' declarator ')'
1023 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1024 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1031 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1032 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1033 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1034 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1035 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1036 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1037 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1038 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1039 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1040 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1041 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1042 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1043 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1044 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1046 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1047 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1048 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1049 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1050 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1051 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1052 The parser therefore prints
1055 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1058 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1059 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1066 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1067 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1068 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1069 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1070 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1071 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1072 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1073 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1074 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1075 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1081 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1082 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1083 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1084 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1088 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1089 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1094 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1098 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1106 with an accompanying forward declaration
1107 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1111 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1112 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1117 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1118 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1121 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1124 Bison requires that all of the
1125 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1126 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1127 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1128 the offending merge.
1130 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1131 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1133 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1134 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1135 the associated reduction.
1136 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1137 action in a GLR parser.
1140 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1142 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1144 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1145 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1146 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1147 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1148 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1149 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1150 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1151 influence syntax analysis.
1152 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1155 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1156 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1157 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1158 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1159 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1160 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1161 future versions of Bison.
1162 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1163 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1164 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1167 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1168 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1169 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1170 initiate error recovery.
1171 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1172 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1173 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1174 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1176 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1177 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1179 @node Compiler Requirements
1180 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1181 @cindex @code{inline}
1182 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1184 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1185 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1186 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1187 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1188 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1189 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1198 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1202 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1203 && ! defined inline)
1212 @cindex textual location
1213 @cindex location, textual
1215 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1216 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1217 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1218 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1220 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1221 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1222 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1223 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1226 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1227 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1228 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1231 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1232 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1233 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1234 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1235 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1236 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1237 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1240 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1241 @cindex Bison parser
1242 @cindex Bison utility
1243 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1246 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1247 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1248 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1249 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1250 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1251 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1252 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1255 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1256 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1257 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1260 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1261 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1262 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1263 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1264 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1265 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1266 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1268 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1269 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1270 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1271 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1272 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1273 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1274 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1275 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1276 C-Language Interface}.
1278 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1279 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1280 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1281 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1282 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1283 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1284 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1285 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1286 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1287 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1288 anything other than their usual meanings.
1290 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1291 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1292 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1293 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1294 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1295 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1296 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1297 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1298 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1301 @section Stages in Using Bison
1302 @cindex stages in using Bison
1305 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1306 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1310 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1311 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1312 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1313 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1314 sequence of C statements.
1317 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1318 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1319 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1320 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1323 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1326 Write error-reporting routines.
1329 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1330 must follow these steps:
1334 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1337 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1340 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1343 @node Grammar Layout
1344 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1345 @cindex grammar file
1347 @cindex format of grammar file
1348 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1350 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1351 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1358 @var{Bison declarations}
1367 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1368 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1370 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1371 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1372 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1373 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1374 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1375 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1377 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1378 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1379 semantic values of various symbols.
1381 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1384 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1385 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1386 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1390 @cindex simple examples
1391 @cindex examples, simple
1393 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1394 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1395 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1396 and a multi-function calculator. All
1397 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1399 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1400 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1401 source file to try them.
1404 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1405 a first example with no operator precedence.
1406 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1407 Operator precedence is introduced.
1408 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1409 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1410 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1411 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1412 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1416 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1417 @cindex reverse polish notation
1418 @cindex polish notation calculator
1419 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1420 @cindex calculator, simple
1422 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1423 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1424 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1425 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1427 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1428 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1431 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1432 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1433 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1434 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1435 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1436 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1437 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1440 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1441 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1443 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1444 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1447 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1450 #define YYSTYPE double
1453 void yyerror (char const *);
1458 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1461 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1462 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1464 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1465 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1466 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1467 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1468 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1469 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1470 which is a floating point number.
1472 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1473 function @code{pow}.
1475 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1476 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1477 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1478 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1481 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1482 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1483 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1484 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1485 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1486 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1487 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1488 type for numeric constants.
1491 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1493 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1504 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1509 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1510 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1511 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1512 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1513 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1514 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1515 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1521 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1522 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1523 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1524 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1525 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1528 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1529 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1530 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1532 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1533 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1534 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1535 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1536 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1537 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1546 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1548 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1556 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1557 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1558 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1559 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1560 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1562 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1563 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1564 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1565 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1566 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1567 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1569 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1570 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1571 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1572 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1575 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1576 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1577 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1580 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1582 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1586 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1590 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1591 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1592 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1593 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1594 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1595 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1596 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1598 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1599 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1600 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1601 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1602 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1605 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1607 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1608 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1609 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1610 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1614 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1615 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1620 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1621 equally well have written them separately:
1625 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1626 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1630 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1631 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1632 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1633 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1634 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1635 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1636 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1637 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1639 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1640 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1641 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1643 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1644 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1648 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1652 means the same thing as this:
1656 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1662 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1665 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1666 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1667 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1669 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1670 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1671 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1672 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1674 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1676 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1677 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1678 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1679 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1681 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1682 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1683 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1684 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1685 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1686 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1687 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1688 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1689 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1691 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1692 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1693 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1694 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1695 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1697 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1698 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1700 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1704 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1705 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1706 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1707 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1718 /* Skip white space. */
1719 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1723 /* Process numbers. */
1724 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1727 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1732 /* Return end-of-input. */
1735 /* Return a single char. */
1742 @subsection The Controlling Function
1743 @cindex controlling function
1744 @cindex main function in simple example
1746 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1747 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1748 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1761 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1762 @cindex error reporting routine
1764 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1765 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1766 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1767 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1768 here is the definition we will use:
1776 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1778 yyerror (char const *s)
1780 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1785 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1786 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1787 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1788 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1789 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1790 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1792 @node Rpcalc Generate
1793 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1794 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1796 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1797 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1798 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1799 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1800 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1801 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1803 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1804 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1806 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1807 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1814 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1815 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1816 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1817 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1818 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1819 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1820 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1822 @node Rpcalc Compile
1823 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1824 @cindex compiling the parser
1826 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1830 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1832 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1836 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1837 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1838 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1842 # @r{List files again.}
1844 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1848 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1849 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1855 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1857 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1861 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1863 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1868 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1869 @cindex infix notation calculator
1871 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1873 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1874 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1875 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1876 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1879 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1883 #define YYSTYPE double
1887 void yyerror (char const *);
1892 /* Bison declarations. */
1896 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1897 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1900 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1909 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1914 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1915 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1916 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1917 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1918 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1919 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1920 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1921 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1928 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1931 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1933 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1934 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1935 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1936 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1937 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1938 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1941 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1942 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1943 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1944 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1945 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1948 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1949 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1950 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1951 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1952 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1954 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1959 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1967 @node Simple Error Recovery
1968 @section Simple Error Recovery
1969 @cindex error recovery, simple
1971 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1972 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1973 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1974 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1975 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1976 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1978 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1979 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1980 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1985 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1986 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1991 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1992 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1993 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1994 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1995 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1996 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1997 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1998 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2001 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2002 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2003 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2004 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2005 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2006 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2009 @node Location Tracking Calc
2010 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2011 @cindex location tracking calculator
2012 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2013 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2015 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2016 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2017 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2018 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2022 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2023 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2024 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2027 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2028 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2030 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2031 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2034 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2040 void yyerror (char const *);
2043 /* Bison declarations. */
2051 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2055 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2056 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2057 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2058 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2059 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2060 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2061 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2065 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2067 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2068 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2069 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2070 from the new information.
2072 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2073 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2084 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2089 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2090 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2091 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2092 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2102 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2103 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2104 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2109 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2110 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2111 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2115 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2116 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2117 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2119 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2120 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2121 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2122 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2123 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2124 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2128 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2130 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2131 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2132 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2135 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2136 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2147 /* Skip white space. */
2148 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2149 ++yylloc.last_column;
2154 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2155 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2159 /* Process numbers. */
2163 ++yylloc.last_column;
2164 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2166 ++yylloc.last_column;
2167 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2174 /* Return end-of-input. */
2179 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2183 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2186 ++yylloc.last_column;
2192 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2193 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2194 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2195 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2197 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2198 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2199 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2200 controlling function:
2207 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2208 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2214 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2215 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2216 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2218 @node Multi-function Calc
2219 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2220 @cindex multi-function calculator
2221 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2222 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2224 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2225 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2226 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2227 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2228 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2230 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2231 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2232 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2233 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2234 functions whose syntax has this form:
2237 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2241 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2242 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2243 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2247 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2251 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2257 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2262 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2265 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2266 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2267 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2270 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2271 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2273 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2275 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2279 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2280 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2282 void yyerror (char const *);
2287 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2288 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2291 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2292 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2299 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2300 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2302 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2305 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2306 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2307 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2309 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2310 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2311 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2312 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2314 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2315 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2316 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2317 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2318 between angle brackets).
2320 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2321 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2322 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2323 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2324 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2325 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2328 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2330 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2331 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2332 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2334 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2345 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2346 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2351 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2352 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2353 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2354 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2355 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2356 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2357 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2358 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2359 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2360 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2361 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2364 /* End of grammar. */
2368 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2369 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2370 @cindex symbol table example
2372 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2373 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2374 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2375 requires some additional C functions for support.
2377 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2378 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2379 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2381 @comment file: calc.h
2384 /* Function type. */
2385 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2389 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2392 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2393 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2396 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2397 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2399 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2404 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2406 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2407 extern symrec *sym_table;
2409 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2410 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2414 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2415 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2416 @code{init_table} as well:
2422 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2424 yyerror (char const *s)
2434 double (*fnct) (double);
2439 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2452 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2457 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2462 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2464 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2465 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2480 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2481 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2483 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2484 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2485 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2486 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2487 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2488 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2490 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2492 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2493 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2497 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2499 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2500 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2501 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2502 ptr->type = sym_type;
2503 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2504 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2512 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2515 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2516 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2517 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2524 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2525 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2526 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2527 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2529 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2530 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2531 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2532 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2533 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2534 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2536 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2537 operators in @code{yylex}.
2539 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2551 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2552 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2560 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2561 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2564 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2570 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2573 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2574 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2575 static size_t length = 40;
2576 static char *symbuf = 0;
2582 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2588 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2592 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2594 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2596 /* Get another character. */
2601 while (isalnum (c));
2608 s = getsym (symbuf);
2610 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2615 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2621 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2622 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2623 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2631 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2634 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2635 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2636 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2639 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2640 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2644 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2646 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2647 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2649 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2650 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2653 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2654 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2655 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2656 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2657 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2658 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2659 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2660 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2661 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2664 @node Grammar Outline
2665 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2667 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2668 appropriate delimiters:
2675 @var{Bison declarations}
2684 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2685 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2686 continues until end of line.
2689 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2690 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2691 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2692 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2693 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2697 @subsection The prologue
2698 @cindex declarations section
2700 @cindex declarations
2702 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2703 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2704 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2705 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2706 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2707 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2708 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2710 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2711 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2714 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2715 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2716 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2717 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2718 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2719 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2720 @code{%union} declaration.
2731 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2735 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2736 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2742 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2743 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2744 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2745 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2746 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2747 @code{#include} directives.
2749 @node Prologue Alternatives
2750 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2751 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2754 @findex %code requires
2755 @findex %code provides
2758 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2759 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2760 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2761 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2762 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2763 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2764 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2766 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2777 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2781 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2782 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2789 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2790 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2791 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2792 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2793 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2794 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2795 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2796 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2797 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2798 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2799 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2801 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2802 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2803 This behavior raises a few questions.
2804 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2805 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2806 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2807 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2808 This behavior is not intuitive.
2810 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2811 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2812 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2813 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2820 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2821 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2824 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2825 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2837 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2841 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2842 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2843 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2850 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2851 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2852 explicit which kind you intend.
2853 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2855 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2856 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2857 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2858 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2859 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2860 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2861 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2862 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2863 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2866 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2867 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2869 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2887 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2893 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2894 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2907 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2908 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2909 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2917 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2918 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2919 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2920 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2921 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2922 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2924 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2925 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2926 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2927 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2928 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2929 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2930 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2931 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2932 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2933 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2934 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2937 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2938 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2939 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2940 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2941 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2942 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2943 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2944 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2945 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2946 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
2964 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2970 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2971 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2984 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2990 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2991 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2999 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3000 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3001 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3004 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3005 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3006 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3007 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3008 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3009 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3012 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3013 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3014 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3015 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3017 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3018 organize your grammar file.
3019 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3024 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3025 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3026 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3027 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
3031 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3032 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3033 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3034 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
3039 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3040 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3042 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3044 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3045 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3046 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3047 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3049 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3050 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3051 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3052 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3053 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3054 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3055 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3056 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3059 @node Bison Declarations
3060 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3061 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3062 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3064 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3065 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3066 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3067 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3070 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3071 @cindex grammar rules section
3072 @cindex rules section for grammar
3074 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3075 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3077 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3078 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3079 if it is the first thing in the file.
3082 @subsection The epilogue
3083 @cindex additional C code section
3085 @cindex C code, section for additional
3087 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3088 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3089 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3090 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3091 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3092 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3093 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3094 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3095 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3096 C-Language Interface}.
3098 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3099 from the grammar rules.
3101 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3102 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3103 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3104 of the grammar file.
3107 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3108 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3109 @cindex terminal symbol
3113 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3116 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3117 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3118 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3119 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3120 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3121 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3122 the symbol to stand for it.
3124 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3125 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3126 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3128 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3129 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3130 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3131 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3132 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3133 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3134 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3136 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3140 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3141 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3142 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3143 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3146 @cindex character token
3147 @cindex literal token
3148 @cindex single-character literal
3149 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3150 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3151 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3152 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3153 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3154 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3155 ,Operator Precedence}).
3157 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3158 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3159 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3160 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3161 your program will confuse other readers.
3163 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3164 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3165 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3166 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3167 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3168 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3172 @cindex string token
3173 @cindex literal string token
3174 @cindex multicharacter literal
3175 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3176 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3177 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3178 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3179 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3181 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3182 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3183 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3184 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3185 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3187 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3189 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3190 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3191 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3192 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3193 read your program will be confused.
3195 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3196 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3197 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3198 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3199 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3200 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3203 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3204 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3205 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3207 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3208 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3209 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3210 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3211 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3212 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3213 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3214 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3215 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3216 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3217 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3218 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3220 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3221 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3222 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3223 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3224 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3226 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3227 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3228 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3229 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3230 characters in the following C-language string:
3233 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3236 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3237 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3238 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3239 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3240 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3241 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3242 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3243 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3244 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3245 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3248 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3249 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3250 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3251 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3252 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3255 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3257 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3258 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3260 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3264 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3270 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3271 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3272 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3284 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3285 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3287 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3288 extra white space as you wish.
3290 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3291 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3294 @{@var{C statements}@}
3299 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3300 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3301 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3302 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3303 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3304 compiler can check it.
3306 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3307 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3308 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3309 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3310 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3311 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3312 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3313 character constants.
3315 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3319 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3320 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3324 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3325 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3332 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3334 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3335 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3336 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3353 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3357 @section Recursive Rules
3358 @cindex recursive rule
3360 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3361 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3362 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3363 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3364 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3374 @cindex left recursion
3375 @cindex right recursion
3377 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3378 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3379 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3390 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3391 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3392 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3393 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3394 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3395 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3396 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3399 @cindex mutual recursion
3400 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3401 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3402 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3410 | primary '+' primary
3422 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3426 @section Defining Language Semantics
3427 @cindex defining language semantics
3428 @cindex language semantics, defining
3430 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3431 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3432 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3434 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3435 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3436 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3437 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3440 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3441 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3442 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3443 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3444 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3445 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3446 action in the middle of a rule.
3450 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3451 @cindex semantic value type
3452 @cindex value type, semantic
3453 @cindex data types of semantic values
3454 @cindex default data type
3456 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3457 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3458 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3459 Notation Calculator}).
3461 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3462 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3463 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3466 #define YYSTYPE double
3470 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3471 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3472 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3473 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3475 @node Multiple Types
3476 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3478 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3479 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3480 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3481 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3484 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3485 requires you to do two things:
3489 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3490 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3491 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3492 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3496 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3497 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3498 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3499 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3500 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3509 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3511 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3512 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3513 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3514 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3516 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3517 placed at any position in the rule;
3518 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3519 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3520 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3521 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3523 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3524 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3525 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3526 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3527 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3528 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3529 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3530 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3531 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3532 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3535 Here is a typical example:
3545 Or, in terms of named references:
3549 exp[result]: @dots{}
3550 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3551 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3556 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3557 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3558 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3559 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3560 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3561 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3563 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3564 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3565 referred to as @code{$2}.
3567 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3568 references construct.
3570 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3571 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3572 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3573 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3574 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3578 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3582 @cindex default action
3583 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3584 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3585 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3586 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3587 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3588 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3590 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3591 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3592 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3593 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3594 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3598 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3599 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3605 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3610 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3611 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3612 definition of @code{foo}.
3615 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3616 any, from a semantic action.
3617 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3618 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3621 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3622 @cindex action data types
3623 @cindex data types in actions
3625 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3626 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3628 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3629 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3630 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3631 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3632 in the rule. In this example,
3643 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3644 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3645 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3646 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3648 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3649 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3650 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3662 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3663 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3665 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3666 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3667 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3668 @cindex mid-rule actions
3670 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3671 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3672 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3674 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3675 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3676 it is run before they are parsed.
3678 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3679 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3680 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3681 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3684 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3685 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3686 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3687 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3688 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3689 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3691 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3692 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3693 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3694 at the end of the rule.
3696 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3697 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3698 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3699 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3700 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3701 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3705 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3706 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3707 declare_variable ($3); @}
3709 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3714 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3715 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3716 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3717 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3718 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3719 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3720 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3721 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3723 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3724 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3725 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3726 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3727 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3730 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3731 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3732 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3733 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3734 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3736 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3737 Discarded Symbols}).
3738 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3739 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3741 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3742 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3747 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3753 pop_context ($1); @}
3756 let: LET '(' var ')'
3757 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3758 declare_variable ($3); @}
3765 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3766 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3767 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3769 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3770 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3771 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3772 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3773 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3778 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3779 | '@{' statements '@}'
3785 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3789 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3790 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3793 | '@{' statements '@}'
3799 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3800 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3801 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3802 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3803 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3804 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3806 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3807 actions into the two rules, like this:
3811 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3812 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3813 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3814 '@{' statements '@}'
3820 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3821 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3823 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3824 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3825 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3829 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3830 declarations statements '@}'
3831 | '@{' statements '@}'
3837 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3838 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3840 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3841 serves as a subroutine:
3845 subroutine: /* empty */
3846 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3852 compound: subroutine
3853 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3855 '@{' statements '@}'
3861 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3862 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3864 @node Tracking Locations
3865 @section Tracking Locations
3867 @cindex textual location
3868 @cindex location, textual
3870 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3871 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3872 especially symbol locations.
3874 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3875 actions to take when rules are matched.
3878 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3879 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3880 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3884 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3885 @cindex data type of locations
3886 @cindex default location type
3888 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3889 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3891 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3892 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3893 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3894 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3898 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3907 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3908 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3909 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3910 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3911 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3913 @node Actions and Locations
3914 @subsection Actions and Locations
3915 @cindex location actions
3916 @cindex actions, location
3919 @vindex @@@var{name}
3920 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3922 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3923 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3925 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3926 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3927 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3928 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3929 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3932 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3933 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3934 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3935 references construct.
3937 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3944 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3945 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3946 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3947 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3954 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3955 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3956 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3962 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3963 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3964 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3967 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3968 example above simply rewrites this way:
3981 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3982 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3983 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3990 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
3991 from a semantic action.
3992 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
3993 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3995 @node Location Default Action
3996 @subsection Default Action for Locations
3997 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
3998 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4000 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4001 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4002 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4003 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4004 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4005 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4006 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4007 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4010 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4011 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4013 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4014 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4015 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4016 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4017 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4018 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4019 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4020 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4021 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4022 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4024 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4028 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4032 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4033 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4034 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4035 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4039 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4040 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4041 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4042 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4049 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4050 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4051 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4053 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4057 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4058 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4061 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4062 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4063 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4064 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4067 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4068 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4069 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4070 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4073 @node Named References
4074 @section Named References
4075 @cindex named references
4077 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4078 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4079 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4080 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4081 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4082 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4084 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4085 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4086 used as named references. For example:
4090 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4091 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4096 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4100 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4101 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4106 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4112 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4115 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4118 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4123 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4124 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4125 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4128 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4129 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4134 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4135 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4136 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4139 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4140 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4146 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4147 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4150 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4151 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4155 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4156 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4157 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4158 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4159 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4160 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4161 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4163 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4167 @section Bison Declarations
4168 @cindex declarations, Bison
4169 @cindex Bison declarations
4171 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4172 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4175 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4176 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4177 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4178 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4180 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4181 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4182 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4183 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4186 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4187 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4188 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4189 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4190 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4191 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4192 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4193 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4194 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4195 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4196 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4197 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4198 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4199 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4203 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4204 @cindex version requirement
4205 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4208 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4209 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4213 %require "@var{version}"
4217 @subsection Token Type Names
4218 @cindex declaring token type names
4219 @cindex token type names, declaring
4220 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4223 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4229 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4230 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4231 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4233 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4234 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4235 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4238 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4239 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4240 following the token name:
4244 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4248 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4249 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4250 with each other or with normal characters.
4252 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4253 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4254 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4255 Than One Value Type}).
4261 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4265 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4269 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4270 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4271 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4278 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4279 equivalent literal string tokens:
4282 %token <operator> OR "||"
4283 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4288 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4289 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4290 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4291 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4292 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4293 the literal string instead of the token name.
4295 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4296 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4300 %token END 0 "end of file"
4303 @node Precedence Decl
4304 @subsection Operator Precedence
4305 @cindex precedence declarations
4306 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4307 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4309 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4310 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4311 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4312 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4313 operator precedence.
4315 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4316 @code{%token}: either
4319 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4326 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4329 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4330 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4331 all the @var{symbols}:
4335 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4336 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4337 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4338 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4339 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4340 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4341 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4342 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4343 considered a syntax error.
4346 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4347 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4348 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4349 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4350 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4353 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4354 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4355 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4356 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4361 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4362 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4366 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4367 @cindex declaring value types
4368 @cindex value types, declaring
4371 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4372 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4373 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4388 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4389 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4390 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4391 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4393 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4394 @code{union}. For example:
4406 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4407 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4410 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4411 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4412 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4414 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4415 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4417 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4418 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4419 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4420 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4428 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4433 and then your grammar can use the following
4434 instead of @code{%union}:
4447 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4448 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4449 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4453 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4454 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4455 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4458 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4462 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4463 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4464 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4465 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4466 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4469 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4470 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4471 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4472 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4474 @node Initial Action Decl
4475 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4476 @findex %initial-action
4478 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4479 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4482 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4483 @findex %initial-action
4484 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4485 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4486 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4487 @code{%parse-param}.
4490 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4493 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4496 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4501 @node Destructor Decl
4502 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4503 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4507 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4508 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4509 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4510 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4511 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4512 must discard the start symbol.
4514 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4515 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4516 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4517 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4519 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4520 symbol is automatically discarded.
4522 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4524 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4526 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4527 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4528 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4529 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4531 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4532 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4533 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4534 tag among @var{symbols}.
4535 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4536 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4537 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4539 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4540 (These default forms are experimental.
4541 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4543 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4544 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4545 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4546 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4548 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4549 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4550 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4551 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4552 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4559 %union @{ char *string; @}
4560 %token <string> STRING1
4561 %token <string> STRING2
4562 %type <string> string1
4563 %type <string> string2
4564 %union @{ char character; @}
4565 %token <character> CHR
4566 %type <character> chr
4569 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4570 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4571 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4572 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4576 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4577 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4578 to @code{free} by default.
4579 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4580 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4581 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4582 @code{free} only once.
4583 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4584 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4586 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4587 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4588 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4589 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4590 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4591 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4592 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4593 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4594 reference it in your grammar.
4595 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4596 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4602 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4603 @cindex mid-rule actions
4604 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4605 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4606 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4607 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4608 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4609 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4610 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4611 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4615 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4616 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4617 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4622 @cindex discarded symbols
4623 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4627 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4629 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4631 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4632 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4634 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4637 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4638 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4641 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4642 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4643 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4647 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4648 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4649 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4650 @cindex warnings, preventing
4651 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4655 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4656 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4657 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4658 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4659 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4660 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4662 The declaration looks like this:
4668 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4669 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4670 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4671 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4673 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4674 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4675 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4676 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4677 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4678 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4679 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4685 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4689 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4690 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4691 print the number of conflicts.
4694 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4695 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4696 go back to the beginning.
4699 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4700 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4701 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4704 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4705 but will keep silent otherwise.
4708 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4709 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4710 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4711 @cindex default start symbol
4714 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4715 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4716 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4723 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4724 @cindex reentrant parser
4726 @findex %define api.pure
4728 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4729 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4730 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4731 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4732 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4733 program must be called only within interlocks.
4735 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4736 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4737 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4738 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4739 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4741 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4742 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4743 reentrant. It looks like this:
4749 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4750 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4751 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4752 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4753 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4754 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4755 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4756 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4757 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4759 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4760 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4764 @subsection A Push Parser
4767 @findex %define api.push-pull
4769 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4770 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4772 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4773 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4774 each time a new token is made available.
4776 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4777 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4778 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4779 within a certain time period.
4781 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4782 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4783 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4786 %define api.push-pull push
4789 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4790 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4791 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4792 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4793 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4797 %define api.push-pull push
4800 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4801 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4802 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4803 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4805 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4806 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4807 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4808 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4809 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4810 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4811 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4812 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4816 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4818 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4819 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4820 yypstate_delete (ps);
4823 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4824 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4825 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4826 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4827 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4828 example would thus look like this:
4833 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4836 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4837 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4838 yypstate_delete (ps);
4841 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4842 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4844 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4845 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4846 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4847 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4848 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4849 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4850 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4851 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4852 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4853 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4854 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4855 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4856 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4857 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4858 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4859 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4860 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4864 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4865 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4866 yypstate_delete (ps);
4869 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4870 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4871 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
4874 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4875 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4876 @cindex declaration summary
4877 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4879 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4881 @deffn {Directive} %union
4882 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4883 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4886 @deffn {Directive} %token
4887 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4888 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4891 @deffn {Directive} %right
4892 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4893 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4896 @deffn {Directive} %left
4897 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4898 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4901 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4902 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4903 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4904 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4908 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4909 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4910 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4914 @deffn {Directive} %type
4915 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4916 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4919 @deffn {Directive} %start
4920 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4924 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4925 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4926 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4932 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4935 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4936 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4938 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
4939 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
4940 @xref{%code Summary}.
4943 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4944 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
4945 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
4946 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4949 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4950 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4951 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4952 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
4955 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4956 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
4957 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4958 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
4959 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4961 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
4962 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
4963 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
4964 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
4965 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
4966 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
4967 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
4968 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
4969 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
4970 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
4972 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
4973 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
4974 (Reentrant) Parser}.
4976 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
4977 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
4978 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
4980 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
4981 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
4982 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
4983 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
4984 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
4986 @findex %code requires
4987 @findex %code provides
4988 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
4989 header also contains their code.
4990 @xref{%code Summary}.
4993 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
4994 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
4997 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
4998 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
4999 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5002 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5003 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5004 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5007 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5008 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5009 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5010 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5012 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5016 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5017 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5018 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5019 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5020 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5021 accurate syntax error messages.
5024 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5025 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5026 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5028 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5029 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5030 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5031 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5032 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5033 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5034 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5035 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5037 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5041 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5042 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5043 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5048 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5049 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5050 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5051 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5052 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5053 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5054 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5058 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5059 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5062 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5063 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5064 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5068 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5069 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5070 Require a Version of Bison}.
5073 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5074 Specify the skeleton to use.
5076 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5077 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5078 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5079 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5081 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5082 file in the Bison installation directory.
5083 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5084 directory of the grammar file.
5085 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5088 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5089 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5090 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5091 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5092 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5093 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5094 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5097 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5098 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5099 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5100 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5101 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5102 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5103 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5106 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5107 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5108 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5112 The highest token number, plus one.
5114 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5116 The number of grammar rules,
5118 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5122 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5123 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5124 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5125 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5129 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5130 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5131 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5135 @node %define Summary
5136 @subsection %define Summary
5138 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5139 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5140 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5141 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5142 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5143 @code{%define} directive:
5145 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5146 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5147 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5148 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5150 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5151 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5152 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5153 to specifying @code{""}.
5155 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5156 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5157 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5160 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5161 @code{%define} accepts.
5163 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5164 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5168 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5170 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5171 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5173 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5175 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5176 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5179 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5180 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5181 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5182 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5183 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5184 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5187 @c ================================================== api.pure
5189 @findex %define api.pure
5192 @item Language(s): C
5194 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5195 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5197 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5199 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5203 @findex %define api.push-pull
5206 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5208 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5209 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5210 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5211 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5213 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5215 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5218 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5220 @item lr.default-reductions
5221 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5224 @item Language(s): all
5226 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5227 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5228 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5229 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5231 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5232 @item Default Value:
5234 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5235 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5239 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5241 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5242 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5245 @item Language(s): all
5246 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5247 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5248 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5249 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5252 @c ================================================== lr.type
5255 @findex %define lr.type
5258 @item Language(s): all
5260 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5261 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5262 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5264 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5266 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5270 @findex %define namespace
5273 @item Languages(s): C++
5275 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5276 For example, if you specify:
5279 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5282 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5285 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5288 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5289 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5292 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5298 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5299 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5300 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5302 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5304 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5305 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5306 lexical analyzer function.
5307 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5308 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5309 lexical analyzer function.
5310 For example, if you specify:
5313 %define namespace "foo"
5314 %name-prefix "bar::"
5317 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5321 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5323 @findex %define parse.lac
5326 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5328 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5329 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5330 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5331 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5337 @subsection %code Summary
5341 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5342 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5343 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5344 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5345 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5346 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5347 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5348 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5350 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5351 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5352 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5353 in the parser implementation.
5355 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5356 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5357 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5359 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5362 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5363 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5364 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5365 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5366 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5367 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5371 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5372 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5373 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5376 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5377 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5381 @findex %code requires
5384 @item Language(s): C, C++
5386 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5387 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5388 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5389 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5390 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5392 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5393 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5398 @findex %code provides
5401 @item Language(s): C, C++
5403 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5404 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5406 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5407 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5415 @item Language(s): C, C++
5417 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5418 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5419 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5420 parser implementation file. For example:
5429 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5433 @findex %code imports
5436 @item Language(s): Java
5438 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5440 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5441 before any class definitions.
5445 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5446 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5447 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5448 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5451 @node Multiple Parsers
5452 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5454 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5455 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5456 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5457 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5459 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5460 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5461 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5462 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5463 names that do not conflict.
5465 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5466 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5467 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5468 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5469 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5470 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5471 @code{clex}, and so on.
5473 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5474 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5475 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5476 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5477 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5479 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5480 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5481 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5482 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5485 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5486 @cindex C-language interface
5489 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5490 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5491 functions that it needs to use.
5493 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5494 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5495 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5496 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5499 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5500 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5501 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5502 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5503 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5504 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5506 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5507 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5508 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5512 @node Parser Function
5513 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5516 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5517 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5518 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5519 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5520 without reading further.
5523 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5524 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5525 is due to end-of-input).
5527 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5528 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5531 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5534 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5539 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5544 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5547 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5548 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5549 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5551 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5552 @findex %parse-param
5553 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5554 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5555 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5556 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5557 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5560 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5563 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5564 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5568 Then call the parser like this:
5572 int nastiness, randomness;
5573 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5574 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5580 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5583 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5586 @node Push Parser Function
5587 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5588 @findex yypush_parse
5590 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5591 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5593 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5594 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5595 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5596 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5598 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5599 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5600 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5601 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5604 @node Pull Parser Function
5605 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5606 @findex yypull_parse
5608 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5609 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5611 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5612 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5613 declaration is used.
5614 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5616 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5617 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5620 @node Parser Create Function
5621 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5622 @findex yypstate_new
5624 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5625 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5627 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5628 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5629 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5630 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5632 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5633 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5634 or 0 if no memory was available.
5635 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5639 @node Parser Delete Function
5640 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5641 @findex yypstate_delete
5643 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5644 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5646 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5647 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5648 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5649 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5651 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5652 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5653 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5657 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5659 @cindex lexical analyzer
5661 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5662 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5663 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5664 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5666 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5667 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5668 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5669 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5670 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5671 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5672 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5676 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5677 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5678 of the token it has read.
5679 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5680 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5682 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5683 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5686 @node Calling Convention
5687 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5689 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5690 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5691 signifies end-of-input.
5693 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5694 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5695 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5696 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5698 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5699 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5700 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5701 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5702 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5703 signifies end-of-input.
5705 Here is an example showing these things:
5712 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5715 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5716 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5718 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5724 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5725 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5727 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5728 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5732 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5733 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5734 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5735 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5738 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5739 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5740 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5741 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5742 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5745 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5746 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5747 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5748 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5751 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5754 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5755 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5756 strlen (token_buffer))
5757 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5758 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5763 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5764 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5768 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5771 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5772 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5773 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5774 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5780 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5781 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5786 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5787 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5788 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5789 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5790 declaration looks like this:
5803 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5808 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5809 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5814 @node Token Locations
5815 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5818 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
5819 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
5820 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
5821 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
5822 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
5823 data in that variable.
5825 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5826 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5827 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5828 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5829 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5832 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5835 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5837 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5838 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5839 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5840 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5841 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5842 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5847 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5850 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5851 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5856 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5857 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5858 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5862 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5863 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5866 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5868 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5869 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5875 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5876 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5877 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5881 results in the following signature:
5884 int yylex (int *nastiness);
5885 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5888 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
5891 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
5892 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5896 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
5899 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5900 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5903 @node Error Reporting
5904 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
5905 @cindex error reporting function
5908 @cindex syntax error
5910 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
5911 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
5912 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
5913 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
5916 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
5917 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
5918 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
5919 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
5920 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5922 @findex %error-verbose
5923 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
5924 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
5925 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
5926 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
5927 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
5929 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
5930 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
5931 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
5932 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
5933 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
5934 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
5936 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
5937 translated automatically from English to some other language before
5938 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
5940 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
5945 yyerror (char const *s)
5949 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
5954 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
5955 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
5956 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
5957 immediately return 1.
5959 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
5960 an access to the current location.
5961 This is indeed the case for the GLR
5962 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
5963 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5967 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5968 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5971 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
5974 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5975 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5978 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
5979 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
5980 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
5981 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
5985 /* Location tracking. */
5989 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5991 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5992 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5996 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
5999 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6000 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6001 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6002 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6007 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6008 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6009 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6010 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6011 message is always passed last.
6013 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6014 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6015 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6019 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6020 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6021 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6022 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6024 @node Action Features
6025 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6026 @cindex summary, action features
6027 @cindex action features summary
6029 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6030 are useful in actions.
6032 @deffn {Variable} $$
6033 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6034 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6037 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6038 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6039 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6042 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6043 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6044 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6045 Types of Values in Actions}.
6048 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6049 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6050 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6051 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6054 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6055 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6056 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6059 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6060 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6061 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6064 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6066 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6067 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6068 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6069 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6070 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6071 going to be reduced by this rule.
6073 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6074 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6075 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6078 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6081 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6083 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6086 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6088 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6092 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6094 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6095 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6096 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6097 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6098 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6101 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6102 @findex YYRECOVERING
6103 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6104 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6105 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6108 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6109 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6110 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6111 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6112 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6114 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6117 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6118 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6120 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6122 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6125 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6126 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6127 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6128 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6131 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6132 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6133 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6134 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6136 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6139 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6140 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6141 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6142 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6144 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6149 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6150 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6153 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6157 @c int first_line, last_line;
6158 @c int first_column, last_column;
6162 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6163 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6165 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6166 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6167 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6170 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6173 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6175 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6176 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6180 @node Internationalization
6181 @section Parser Internationalization
6182 @cindex internationalization
6188 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6189 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6190 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6191 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6192 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6193 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6194 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6195 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6198 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6199 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6200 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6205 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6206 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6207 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6208 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6209 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6213 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6218 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6219 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6220 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6221 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6222 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6223 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6224 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6225 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6226 Bison-generated parser.
6229 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6230 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6231 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6235 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6238 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6239 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6240 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6244 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6245 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6246 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6249 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6255 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6259 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6265 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6266 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6267 @cindex algorithm of parser
6270 @cindex parser stack
6271 @cindex stack, parser
6273 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6274 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6275 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6277 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6278 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6281 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6282 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6283 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6284 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6285 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6286 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6287 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6289 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6296 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6297 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6300 expr: expr '*' expr;
6304 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6311 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6312 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6314 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6315 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6316 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6318 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6321 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6322 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6323 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6324 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6325 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6326 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6327 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6328 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6329 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6330 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6334 @section Lookahead Tokens
6335 @cindex lookahead token
6337 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6338 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6339 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6340 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6341 token in order to decide what to do.
6343 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6344 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6345 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6346 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6347 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6348 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6349 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6352 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6353 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6354 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6371 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6372 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6373 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6374 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6375 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6377 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6378 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6379 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6380 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6381 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6382 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6387 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6388 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6389 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6390 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6393 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6395 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6396 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6397 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6399 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6400 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6406 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6412 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6413 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6415 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6416 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6417 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6418 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6421 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6422 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6423 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6424 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6425 contrast it with the other alternative.
6427 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6428 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6432 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6434 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6437 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6438 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6439 making these two inputs equivalent:
6442 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6444 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6447 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6448 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6449 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6450 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6451 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6452 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6453 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6454 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6456 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6457 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6458 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6459 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6461 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6463 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6464 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6465 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6470 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6482 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6491 @section Operator Precedence
6492 @cindex operator precedence
6493 @cindex precedence of operators
6495 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6496 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6497 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6498 shift and when to reduce.
6501 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6502 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6503 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6504 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6507 @node Why Precedence
6508 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6510 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6511 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6525 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6526 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6527 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6528 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6529 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6530 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6531 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6534 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6535 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6536 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6537 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6538 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6539 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6540 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6541 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6544 @cindex associativity
6545 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6546 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6547 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6548 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6549 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6550 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6551 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6552 makes right-associativity.
6554 @node Using Precedence
6555 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6560 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6561 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6562 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6563 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6564 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6565 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6566 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6569 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6570 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6571 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6572 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6573 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6575 @node Precedence Examples
6576 @subsection Precedence Examples
6578 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6586 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6587 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6588 declared with @code{'-'}:
6591 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6597 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6598 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6599 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6601 @node How Precedence
6602 @subsection How Precedence Works
6604 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6605 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6606 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6607 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6608 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6609 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6611 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6612 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6613 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6614 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6615 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6616 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6617 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6620 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6621 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6623 @node Contextual Precedence
6624 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6625 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6626 @cindex unary operator precedence
6627 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6628 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6631 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6632 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6633 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6634 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6636 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6637 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6638 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6639 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6642 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6643 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6644 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6645 modifier's syntax is:
6648 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6652 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6653 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6654 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6655 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6656 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6658 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6659 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6660 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6670 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6677 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6682 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6683 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6684 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6685 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6687 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6688 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6689 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6690 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6692 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6693 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6694 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6695 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6696 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6697 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6699 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6700 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6704 @section Parser States
6705 @cindex finite-state machine
6706 @cindex parser state
6707 @cindex state (of parser)
6709 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6710 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6711 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6712 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6713 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6715 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6716 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6717 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6718 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6719 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6720 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6721 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6722 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6725 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6726 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6727 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6730 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6731 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6732 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6734 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6735 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6738 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6739 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6743 sequence: /* empty */
6744 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6747 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6752 maybeword: /* empty */
6753 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6755 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6761 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6762 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6763 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6764 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6765 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6766 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6768 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6769 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6770 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6772 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6773 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6774 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6775 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6776 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6778 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6779 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6780 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6781 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6784 sequence: /* empty */
6785 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6787 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6791 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6794 sequence: /* empty */
6796 | sequence redirects
6803 redirects:/* empty */
6804 | redirects redirect
6809 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6810 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6811 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6812 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6813 in infinitely many ways!
6815 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6816 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6817 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6818 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6820 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6824 sequence: /* empty */
6830 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6835 sequence: /* empty */
6837 | sequence redirects
6849 | redirects redirect
6854 @node Mysterious Conflicts
6855 @section Mysterious Conflicts
6856 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
6858 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6866 def: param_spec return_spec ','
6870 | name_list ':' type
6888 | name ',' name_list
6893 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
6894 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
6895 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
6896 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
6900 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
6902 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
6903 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
6904 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
6906 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
6907 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
6908 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
6909 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
6910 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
6911 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
6912 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
6915 @cindex canonical LR
6916 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
6917 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
6918 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
6919 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
6920 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
6921 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
6922 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
6923 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
6925 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
6926 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
6927 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
6928 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
6929 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
6940 /* This rule is never used. */
6946 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
6947 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
6948 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
6949 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
6950 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
6951 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
6953 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
6954 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
6955 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
6956 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
6957 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
6958 rather than the one for @code{name}.
6963 | name_list ':' type
6971 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
6972 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
6977 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
6978 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
6979 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
6980 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
6981 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
6982 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
6983 sometimes contain incorrect information.
6985 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
6986 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
6987 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
6988 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
6990 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
6991 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
6994 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
6995 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
6996 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
6997 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7000 @node LR Table Construction
7001 @subsection LR Table Construction
7002 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7005 @cindex canonical LR
7006 @findex %define lr.type
7008 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7009 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7010 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7011 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7014 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7015 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7016 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7017 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7020 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7021 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7022 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7025 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7026 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7027 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7030 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7032 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7035 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7039 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7043 %define lr.type ielr
7046 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7047 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7048 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7049 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7050 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7051 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7052 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7053 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7054 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7055 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7057 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7058 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7059 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7060 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7066 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7069 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7071 @cindex GLR with LALR
7072 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7073 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7074 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7075 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7076 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7077 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7078 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7079 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7080 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7081 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7083 @item Malformed grammars.
7085 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7086 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7087 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7088 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7089 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7094 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7095 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7096 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7097 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7098 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7099 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7100 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7101 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7102 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7106 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7109 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7110 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7111 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7112 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7113 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7114 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7115 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7116 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7117 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7118 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7119 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7120 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7123 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7124 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7125 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7127 @node Default Reductions
7128 @subsection Default Reductions
7129 @cindex default reductions
7130 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7133 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7134 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7135 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7136 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7137 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7139 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7140 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7143 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7145 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7146 @cindex consistent states
7147 @cindex defaulted states
7148 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7149 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7150 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7151 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7152 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7153 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7154 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7155 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7156 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7157 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7158 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7160 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7161 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7162 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7163 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7164 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7165 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7166 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7167 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7168 should already be considered closed.
7170 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7172 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7173 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7174 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7175 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7176 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7177 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7178 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7179 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7180 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7184 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7185 @c sentence from being rejected.
7186 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7187 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7188 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7189 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7190 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7191 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7194 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7195 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7196 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7197 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7198 because the accept action ends the parse.
7200 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7201 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7202 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7203 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7204 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7205 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7206 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7207 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7208 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7209 split the parse instead.
7211 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7212 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7214 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7215 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7216 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7218 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7219 @item @code{consistent}
7220 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7223 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7224 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7229 @findex %define parse.lac
7231 @cindex lookahead correction
7233 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7234 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7235 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7236 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7237 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7238 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7239 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7240 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7241 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7243 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7244 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7245 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7246 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7247 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7249 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7250 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7251 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7252 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7254 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7255 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7257 @item @code{none} (default)
7260 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7261 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7265 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7266 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7267 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7268 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7269 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7270 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7271 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7272 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7273 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7274 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7277 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7278 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7279 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7280 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7281 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7282 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7283 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7284 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7285 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7286 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7288 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7289 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7290 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7291 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7292 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7293 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7294 language-recognition power.
7296 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7299 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7301 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7302 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7303 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7304 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7307 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7309 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7310 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7311 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7312 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7313 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7314 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7318 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7319 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7320 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7321 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7322 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7323 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7324 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7325 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7326 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7327 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7328 has proven insignificant for practical grammars.
7331 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7332 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7333 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7335 @node Unreachable States
7336 @subsection Unreachable States
7337 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7338 @cindex unreachable states
7340 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7341 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7342 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7343 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7345 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7346 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7347 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7348 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7350 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7351 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7352 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7355 There are a few caveats to consider:
7358 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7360 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7361 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7362 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7363 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7364 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7365 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7367 @item Other useless states.
7369 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7370 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7371 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7372 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7373 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7374 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7375 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7378 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7379 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7381 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7382 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7383 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7385 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7386 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7387 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7388 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7389 context-free languages.
7390 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7391 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7392 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7393 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7394 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7395 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7396 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7397 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7399 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7400 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7401 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7402 parser uses the same basic
7403 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7404 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7405 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7406 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7408 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7409 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7410 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7411 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7412 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7414 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7415 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7416 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7417 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7418 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7419 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7420 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7421 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7422 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7423 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7424 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7427 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7428 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7429 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7430 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7431 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7432 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7433 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7434 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7435 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7436 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7437 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7438 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7440 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7441 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7442 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7444 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7445 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7446 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7447 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7448 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7449 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7450 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7451 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7452 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7453 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7454 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7455 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7457 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7460 @node Memory Management
7461 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7462 @cindex memory exhaustion
7463 @cindex memory management
7464 @cindex stack overflow
7465 @cindex parser stack overflow
7466 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7468 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7469 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7470 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7472 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7473 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7474 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7477 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7478 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7479 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7480 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7482 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7483 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7484 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7485 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7486 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7487 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7489 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7490 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7491 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7494 @cindex default stack limit
7495 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7499 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7500 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7501 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7502 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7503 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7505 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7507 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7508 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7509 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7510 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7511 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7512 this deficiency in a future release.
7514 @node Error Recovery
7515 @chapter Error Recovery
7516 @cindex error recovery
7517 @cindex recovery from errors
7519 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7520 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7521 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7524 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7525 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7526 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7527 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7528 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7529 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7530 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7533 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7534 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7535 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7536 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7537 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7538 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7543 stmnts: /* empty string */
7549 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7550 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7552 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7553 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7554 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7555 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7556 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7557 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7558 applicable in the ordinary way.
7560 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7561 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7562 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7563 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7564 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7565 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7566 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7567 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7568 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7569 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7570 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7571 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7573 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7574 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7575 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7578 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7581 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7582 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7583 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7584 spurious error message:
7587 primary: '(' expr ')'
7593 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7594 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7595 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7596 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7597 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7598 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7599 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7602 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7603 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7604 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7605 error messages resume.
7607 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7608 as any other rules can.
7611 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7612 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7613 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7614 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7617 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7618 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7619 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7621 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7623 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7624 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7625 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7626 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7627 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7629 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7630 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7631 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7632 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7635 @node Context Dependency
7636 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7638 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7639 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7640 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7641 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7645 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7646 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7647 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7648 error recovery rules must be written.
7651 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7652 neither clean nor robust.)
7654 @node Semantic Tokens
7655 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7657 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7658 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7664 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7665 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7666 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7668 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7669 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7670 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7671 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7672 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7674 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7675 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7676 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7677 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7678 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7679 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7680 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7682 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7683 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7684 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7685 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7689 typedef int foo, bar;
7693 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7694 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7700 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7701 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7703 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7704 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7705 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7706 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7707 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7712 declarator maybeasm '='
7714 | declarator maybeasm
7720 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7722 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7728 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7729 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7730 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7732 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7733 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7734 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7735 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7736 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7737 the syntactic context.
7739 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7740 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7741 @cindex lexical tie-in
7743 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7744 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7747 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7748 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7749 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7750 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7751 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7758 void yyerror (char const *);
7772 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7786 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7787 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7788 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7790 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7791 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7792 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7795 @node Tie-in Recovery
7796 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7798 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7799 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7801 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7802 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7803 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7804 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7808 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7815 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7816 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7817 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7818 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7819 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7821 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7823 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7824 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7825 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7837 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7838 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7839 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7840 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7842 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7843 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7844 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7845 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7846 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7847 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7850 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7853 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7855 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7856 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7857 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7858 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7859 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7860 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7863 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7864 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7868 @section Understanding Your Parser
7870 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7871 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7872 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7873 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7874 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7876 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7877 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7878 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7879 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
7880 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
7881 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
7882 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7884 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7901 @command{bison} reports:
7904 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7905 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7906 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7907 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7908 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7911 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7912 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7913 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7914 interpretation is the same.
7916 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7917 to precedence and/or associativity:
7920 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7921 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7922 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7927 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7930 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7931 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7932 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7933 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7937 @cindex token, useless
7938 @cindex useless token
7939 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7940 @cindex useless nonterminal
7941 @cindex rule, useless
7942 @cindex useless rule
7943 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7944 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7945 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7946 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7950 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7953 Terminals unused in grammar:
7956 Rules useless in grammar:
7961 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7967 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7968 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7969 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7970 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7971 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7976 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7980 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7992 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7997 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8003 @cindex pointed rule
8004 @cindex rule, pointed
8005 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8006 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8007 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8008 the location of the input cursor.
8013 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8015 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8020 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8021 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8022 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8023 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8024 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8025 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8026 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8027 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8029 @cindex core, item set
8030 @cindex item set core
8031 @cindex kernel, item set
8032 @cindex item set core
8033 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8034 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8035 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8036 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8037 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8038 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8043 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8044 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
8045 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
8046 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
8047 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
8048 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
8050 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8061 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
8063 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8067 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8068 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8069 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8070 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8075 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
8076 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8077 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8078 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8079 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8081 $ shift, and go to state 3
8082 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8083 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8084 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8085 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8089 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8090 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8091 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8092 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp '+' . exp}.
8093 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8096 @cindex accepting state
8097 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8103 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
8109 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
8110 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
8112 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8118 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
8120 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8126 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
8128 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8134 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
8136 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8142 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
8144 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8149 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8155 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8156 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
8157 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8158 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8159 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8161 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8162 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8164 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8165 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8168 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8169 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8170 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8171 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8172 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8173 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8174 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8175 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8177 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8178 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8179 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
8182 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8183 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8184 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8185 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8186 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8187 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8188 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8189 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8190 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8191 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8192 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8193 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8198 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8199 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
8200 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8201 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8202 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8204 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8205 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8207 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8208 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8211 The remaining states are similar:
8217 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8218 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8219 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
8220 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8221 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8223 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8224 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8226 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8227 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8233 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8234 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8235 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8236 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
8237 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8239 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8241 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8242 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8248 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8249 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8250 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8251 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8252 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
8254 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8255 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8256 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8257 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8259 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8260 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8261 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8262 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8263 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8268 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8269 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8270 @samp{*}, but also because the
8271 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8275 @section Tracing Your Parser
8278 @cindex tracing the parser
8280 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8281 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8283 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8286 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8288 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8289 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8290 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8291 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8294 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8295 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8296 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8298 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8300 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8301 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8302 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8303 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8305 the preferred solution.
8308 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8311 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8312 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8313 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8314 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8315 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8316 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8318 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8319 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8320 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8321 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8323 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8324 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8325 messages tell you these things:
8329 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8332 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8333 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8336 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8337 of the state stack afterward.
8340 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8341 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8342 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8343 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8344 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8345 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8346 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8347 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8348 grammar are to blame.
8350 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8351 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8352 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8353 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8354 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8357 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8358 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8359 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8360 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8361 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8362 value (from @code{yylval}).
8364 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8365 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8369 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8370 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) \
8371 print_token_value (file, type, value)
8374 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8377 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8380 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8381 else if (type == NUM)
8382 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8386 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8389 @chapter Invoking Bison
8390 @cindex invoking Bison
8391 @cindex Bison invocation
8392 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8394 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8400 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8401 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8402 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8403 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8404 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8405 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8406 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8407 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8408 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8409 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8410 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8415 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8418 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8421 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8424 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8426 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8427 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8428 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8431 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8432 in alphabetical order by short options.
8433 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8434 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8438 @section Bison Options
8440 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8441 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8442 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8443 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8444 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8447 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8448 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8451 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8457 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8461 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8463 @item --print-localedir
8464 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8466 @item --print-datadir
8467 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8471 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8472 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8473 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8474 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8475 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8476 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8477 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8478 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8479 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8480 for compatibility with POSIX:
8487 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8488 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8489 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8490 this option is specified.
8492 @item -W [@var{category}]
8493 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8494 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8497 @item midrule-values
8498 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8500 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8503 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8506 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8507 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8510 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8513 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8514 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8515 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8518 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8522 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8523 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8524 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8525 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8526 no effect on the conflict report.
8529 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8531 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8532 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8538 Turn off all the warnings.
8540 Treat warnings as errors.
8543 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8544 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8545 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8554 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8555 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8556 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8558 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8559 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8560 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8561 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8562 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8563 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8564 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8568 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8571 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8572 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8573 definition for @var{name}.
8575 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8576 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8577 definitions for @var{name}.
8579 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8580 definitions for @var{name}.
8583 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8584 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8585 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8587 @item -L @var{language}
8588 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8589 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8590 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8591 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8592 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8594 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8598 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8600 @item -p @var{prefix}
8601 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8602 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8603 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8607 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8608 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8609 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8610 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8611 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8612 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8615 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8616 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8617 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8619 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8620 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8621 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8622 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8624 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8625 file in the Bison installation directory.
8626 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8627 current working directory.
8628 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8631 @itemx --token-table
8632 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8639 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8640 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8641 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8642 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8645 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8646 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8647 with other short options.
8649 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8650 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8651 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8652 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8654 @item -r @var{things}
8655 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8656 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8657 separated list of @var{things} among:
8661 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8665 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8666 each rule's lookahead set.
8669 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8670 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8673 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8674 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8678 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8679 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8680 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8683 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8684 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8686 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8687 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8689 @item -g [@var{file}]
8690 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8691 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8692 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8693 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8694 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8695 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8698 @item -x [@var{file}]
8699 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8700 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8701 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8702 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8704 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8705 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8708 @node Option Cross Key
8709 @section Option Cross Key
8711 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8712 the corresponding short option and directive.
8714 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8715 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8716 @include cross-options.texi
8720 @section Yacc Library
8722 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8723 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8724 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8725 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8726 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8727 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8728 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8730 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8731 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8734 int yyerror (char const *);
8737 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8738 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8739 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8745 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8747 @node Other Languages
8748 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8751 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8752 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8756 @section C++ Parsers
8759 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8760 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8761 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8762 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8763 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8764 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8767 @node C++ Bison Interface
8768 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8769 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8773 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8774 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8775 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8776 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8778 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8780 @findex %define namespace
8781 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
8782 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
8783 generated in the following files:
8788 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8789 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8792 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8795 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8796 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8797 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8798 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8799 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8801 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8802 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8803 @samp{%defines} directive.
8806 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8807 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8809 @node C++ Semantic Values
8810 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8811 @c - No objects in unions
8813 @c - Printer and destructor
8815 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8816 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8817 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8818 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8819 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8822 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8823 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8824 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8826 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8827 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8828 to such objects are allowed.
8831 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8832 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8833 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8837 @node C++ Location Values
8838 @subsection C++ Location Values
8842 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8844 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8845 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
8846 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
8847 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
8850 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8851 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8852 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8853 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8854 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8857 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8858 The line, starting at 1.
8861 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8862 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8865 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8866 The column, starting at 0.
8869 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8870 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8873 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8874 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8875 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8876 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8877 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8880 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8881 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8882 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8883 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8886 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8887 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8888 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8891 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8892 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8893 Advance the @code{end} position.
8896 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8897 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8898 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8899 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8902 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8903 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8907 @node C++ Parser Interface
8908 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8909 @c - define parser_class_name
8911 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8913 @c - Reporting errors
8915 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8916 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8917 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8918 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8919 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8920 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8921 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8922 additional argument for its constructor.
8924 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
8925 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
8926 The types for semantics value and locations.
8929 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
8930 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
8931 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
8932 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
8933 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
8934 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
8937 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8938 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8939 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8942 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8943 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8946 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8947 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8948 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8952 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8953 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8954 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8955 or nonzero, full tracing.
8958 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8959 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
8960 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
8961 described by @var{m}.
8965 @node C++ Scanner Interface
8966 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
8967 @c - prefix for yylex.
8968 @c - Pure interface to yylex
8971 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
8972 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
8973 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
8975 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8976 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8977 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
8978 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8982 @node A Complete C++ Example
8983 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
8985 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
8986 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
8987 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
8988 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
8989 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
8990 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
8991 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
8992 actually easier to interface with.
8995 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
8996 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
8997 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
8998 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
8999 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9002 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9003 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9005 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9006 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9007 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9008 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9009 of valid input follows.
9013 seven := one + two * three
9017 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9018 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9020 @c - A place to store error messages
9021 @c - A place for the result
9023 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9024 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9025 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9026 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9027 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9028 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9029 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9031 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9032 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9033 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9036 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9038 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9039 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9042 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9047 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9048 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9049 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9050 factor both as follows.
9052 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9054 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9056 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9057 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9058 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9059 calcxx_driver& driver)
9060 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9065 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9068 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9070 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9075 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9077 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9083 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9084 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9086 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9088 // Handling the scanner.
9091 bool trace_scanning;
9095 Similarly for the parser itself.
9097 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9099 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9100 int parse (const std::string& f);
9106 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9107 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9108 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9109 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9111 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9114 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9115 void error (const std::string& m);
9117 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9120 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9121 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9122 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9123 messages and set error state.
9125 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9127 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9128 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9130 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9131 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9133 variables["one"] = 1;
9134 variables["two"] = 2;
9137 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9142 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9146 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9147 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9148 int res = parser.parse ();
9154 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9156 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9160 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9162 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9167 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9169 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9170 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9171 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9172 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9175 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9177 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9178 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9180 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9184 @findex %code requires
9185 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9186 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9187 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9188 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9189 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9190 use a forward declaration of the driver.
9191 @xref{%code Summary}.
9193 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9197 class calcxx_driver;
9202 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9203 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9206 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9208 // The parsing context.
9209 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9210 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9214 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9215 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9216 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9217 automatically propagated.
9219 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9224 // Initialize the initial location.
9225 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9230 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9231 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9234 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9241 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9244 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9256 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9257 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9259 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9262 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9268 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9269 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9270 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9271 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
9274 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9276 %token END 0 "end of file"
9278 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9279 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
9284 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9287 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9288 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9290 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
9291 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9293 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
9297 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9299 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9303 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9305 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
9306 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
9309 "identifier" ":=" exp
9310 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9314 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9315 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9316 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9317 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9318 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9319 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9324 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9327 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9330 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9331 const std::string& m)
9333 driver.error (l, m);
9337 @node Calc++ Scanner
9338 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9340 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9341 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9343 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9345 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9350 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9351 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9353 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9354 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9355 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9356 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9360 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9361 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9362 not of token_type. */
9363 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9368 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9369 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9370 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9371 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9373 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9375 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9379 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9381 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9383 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9389 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9390 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9391 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9392 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9393 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9394 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9395 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9397 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9401 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9408 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9409 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9413 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9414 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9415 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9416 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9418 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9421 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9423 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9424 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9425 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9428 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9429 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9430 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9432 return token::NUMBER;
9434 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9435 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9440 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9441 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9443 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9447 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9449 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9452 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9454 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9455 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
9462 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9469 @node Calc++ Top Level
9470 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9472 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9474 @comment file: calc++.cc
9477 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9481 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9483 calcxx_driver driver;
9484 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9485 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9486 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9487 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9488 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9489 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9490 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9496 @section Java Parsers
9499 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9500 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9501 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9502 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9503 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9504 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9505 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9506 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9509 @node Java Bison Interface
9510 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9511 @c - %language "Java"
9513 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9514 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9516 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9517 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9519 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9520 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9521 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9522 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9523 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9524 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9525 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9526 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9527 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9528 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9530 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9532 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9533 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9534 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9535 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9538 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9539 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9541 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9542 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9544 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9545 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9547 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9548 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9549 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9550 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9551 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9552 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9553 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9554 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9555 access the token names and codes.
9557 @node Java Semantic Values
9558 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9559 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9561 @c - Printer and destructor
9563 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9564 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9565 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9568 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9569 %type <Integer> number
9572 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9573 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9574 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9575 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9576 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9579 %define stype "ASTNode"
9583 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9584 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9586 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9587 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9588 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9589 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9590 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9591 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9593 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9594 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9595 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9597 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9598 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9599 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9602 @node Java Location Values
9603 @subsection Java Location Values
9608 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
9609 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
9610 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
9611 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9612 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
9613 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
9614 renamed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9616 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9617 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9618 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9619 be supplied by the user.
9622 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9623 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9624 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9627 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9628 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9631 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9632 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9635 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9636 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9637 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9638 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9642 @node Java Parser Interface
9643 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9644 @c - define parser_class_name
9646 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9648 @c - Reporting errors
9650 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9651 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9652 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9653 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9654 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9656 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9657 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9658 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9659 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9660 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9661 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9663 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9664 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9665 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9666 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
9668 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9669 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9670 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9671 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9672 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9673 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9675 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
9676 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
9678 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9679 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9680 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9681 which initialize them automatically.
9683 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
9684 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
9686 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9687 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9688 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
9692 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9693 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9694 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
9696 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9697 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9698 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
9701 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9702 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9703 @code{false} otherwise.
9706 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9707 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9708 from a syntax error.
9709 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9712 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9713 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9714 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9718 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9719 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9720 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9721 or nonzero, full tracing.
9725 @node Java Scanner Interface
9726 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9729 @c - Lexer interface
9731 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9732 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9733 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9734 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
9736 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
9737 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
9738 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
9739 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
9742 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
9743 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
9744 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
9745 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
9748 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
9750 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9751 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
9752 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
9753 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
9756 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
9757 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9758 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
9761 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9762 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9765 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9766 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9767 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9768 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9769 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9771 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9772 "@var{class-name}".}
9775 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9776 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
9778 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9779 "@var{class-name}".}
9783 @node Java Action Features
9784 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9786 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9787 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9789 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9790 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9793 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9794 This may not be assigned to.
9795 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9798 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9799 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9800 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9804 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9805 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9806 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9807 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9808 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9809 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9812 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9813 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9814 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9815 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9817 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9821 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9822 This may not be assigned to.
9823 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9827 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9828 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9831 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
9832 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9833 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9836 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
9837 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9838 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9841 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
9842 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
9843 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9846 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9847 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9848 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9850 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9853 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9854 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9855 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9856 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9861 @node Java Differences
9862 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9864 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9865 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9866 section summarizes these differences.
9870 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9871 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9872 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9873 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9874 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9875 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9876 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9878 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9879 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9880 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9881 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9882 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9885 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9886 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9887 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9888 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9889 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9890 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9891 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9892 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9893 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9896 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9898 @item @code{%code imports}
9899 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9900 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9901 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9903 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9904 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9906 @item @code{%code lexer}
9907 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9908 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
9909 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
9913 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
9914 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
9915 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
9917 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
9918 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
9923 @node Java Declarations Summary
9924 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
9926 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
9927 meaning when used in a Java parser.
9929 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
9930 Generate a Java class for the parser.
9933 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9934 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
9935 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
9936 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
9937 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9940 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9941 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
9942 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
9943 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9946 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9947 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
9948 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
9949 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9952 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
9953 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
9954 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9957 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
9958 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
9960 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9963 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9964 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
9965 @xref{Java Differences}.
9968 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9969 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
9970 @xref{Java Differences}.
9973 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9974 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
9975 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9978 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
9979 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
9980 @emph{outside} the parser class.
9981 @xref{Java Differences}.
9984 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
9985 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
9986 @xref{Java Differences}.
9989 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
9990 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
9991 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9994 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
9995 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
9996 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9999 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10000 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10001 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10004 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10005 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10007 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10010 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10011 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10012 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10013 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10016 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10017 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10018 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10019 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10020 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10023 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10024 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10025 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10028 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10029 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10030 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10031 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10034 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10035 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10036 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10037 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10040 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10041 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10042 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10045 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10046 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10047 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10050 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10051 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10052 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10055 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10056 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10057 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10058 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10062 @c ================================================= FAQ
10065 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10066 @cindex frequently asked questions
10069 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10073 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10074 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10075 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10076 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10077 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10078 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10079 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10080 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10081 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10082 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10083 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10084 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10087 @node Memory Exhausted
10088 @section Memory Exhausted
10091 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10092 message. What can I do?
10095 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10098 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10099 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10101 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10102 following typical questions:
10105 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10106 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10107 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10114 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10115 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10116 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10119 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10120 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10121 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10122 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10123 @file{first-line.l}:
10129 #include <stdlib.h>
10133 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10137 yyparse (char const *file)
10139 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10143 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10147 /* One token only. */
10149 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10152 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10170 If the file @file{input} contains
10178 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10181 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10182 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10183 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10188 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10189 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10190 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10191 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10192 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10193 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10194 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10195 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10198 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10199 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10200 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10201 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10203 @node Strings are Destroyed
10204 @section Strings are Destroyed
10207 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10208 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10209 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10212 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10213 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10214 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10220 char *yylval = NULL;
10225 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10233 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10234 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10235 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10236 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10242 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10245 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10246 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10247 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10253 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10254 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10255 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10256 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10257 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10258 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10261 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10262 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10263 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10268 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10269 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10272 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10273 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10276 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10277 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10278 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10279 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10280 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10281 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10282 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10284 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10286 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10287 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10288 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10289 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10290 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10291 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10294 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10295 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10298 @node Multiple start-symbols
10299 @section Multiple start-symbols
10302 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10303 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10304 multiple entry points.
10307 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10308 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10309 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10310 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10314 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10316 start: START_FOO foo
10320 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10321 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10323 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10324 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10325 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10326 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10327 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10328 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10329 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10330 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10333 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10338 int t = start_token;
10343 /* @r{The rules.} */
10347 @node Secure? Conform?
10348 @section Secure? Conform?
10351 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10354 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10355 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10356 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10357 please send us a bug report.
10359 @node I can't build Bison
10360 @section I can't build Bison
10363 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10364 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10368 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10369 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10370 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10371 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10372 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10373 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10374 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10377 @node Where can I find help?
10378 @section Where can I find help?
10381 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10384 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10385 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10386 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10387 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10388 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10389 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10390 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10391 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10395 @section Bug Reports
10398 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10401 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10402 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10403 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10404 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10405 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10407 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10408 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10409 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10410 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10411 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10413 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10414 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10415 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10416 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10417 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10418 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10420 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10421 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
10423 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10425 @node More Languages
10426 @section More Languages
10429 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10430 favorite language here}?
10433 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10434 languages; contributions are welcome.
10437 @section Beta Testing
10440 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10443 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10444 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10445 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10446 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10447 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10448 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10449 essentially halted.
10451 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10452 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10453 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10454 systems are especially welcome.
10456 @node Mailing Lists
10457 @section Mailing Lists
10460 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10463 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10465 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10467 @node Table of Symbols
10468 @appendix Bison Symbols
10469 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10470 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10472 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10473 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10474 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10477 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10478 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
10479 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10482 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10483 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10487 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10488 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10492 @deffn {Variable} $$
10493 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10497 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10498 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10499 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10502 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10503 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10507 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10508 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10512 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10513 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10514 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10515 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10518 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10519 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10520 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10521 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10522 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10526 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10527 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10530 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10531 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10535 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10536 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10539 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10540 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10541 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10544 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10545 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10548 This feature is experimental.
10549 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10552 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10555 @deffn {Directive} <>
10556 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10559 This feature is experimental.
10560 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10563 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10566 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10567 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10568 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10569 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10572 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10573 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10574 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
10575 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
10576 @xref{%code Summary}.
10579 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10580 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10584 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10585 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10586 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10591 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
10592 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
10593 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
10594 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
10597 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10598 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10599 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10602 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10603 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10604 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10607 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10608 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10609 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10612 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10613 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10614 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10618 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10619 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10620 used in the grammar.
10623 @deffn {Symbol} error
10624 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10625 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10626 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10627 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10628 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10629 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10630 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10631 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10634 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10635 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
10636 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10639 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10640 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10644 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10645 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10646 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10649 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10650 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10653 @deffn {Directive} %language
10654 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10655 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10658 @deffn {Directive} %left
10659 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
10660 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10663 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10664 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10665 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10669 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10670 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10671 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10672 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10673 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10676 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10677 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10681 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10682 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10683 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10688 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10689 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10690 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10693 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10694 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
10695 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10698 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10699 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
10700 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10703 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10704 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10705 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
10706 Function @code{yyparse}}.
10709 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10710 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10711 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10714 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10715 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
10716 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
10717 unreasonable usage.
10720 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
10721 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
10722 Require a Version of Bison}.
10725 @deffn {Directive} %right
10726 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
10727 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10730 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
10731 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
10732 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10735 @deffn {Directive} %start
10736 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
10740 @deffn {Directive} %token
10741 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
10742 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
10745 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
10746 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
10747 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10750 @deffn {Directive} %type
10751 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
10752 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
10755 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
10756 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
10757 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
10761 @deffn {Directive} %union
10762 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
10763 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
10766 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
10767 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
10768 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
10769 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
10770 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10772 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
10776 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
10777 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
10778 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
10779 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10781 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
10785 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
10786 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
10787 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10790 @deffn {Variable} yychar
10791 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10792 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10793 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10794 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10797 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10798 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10799 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10802 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10803 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10804 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10807 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10808 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10809 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10810 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10813 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10814 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10815 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10818 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10819 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
10820 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
10821 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
10822 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10824 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10828 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10829 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10830 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10831 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10834 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10835 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10836 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10837 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10838 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10839 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10842 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10843 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10844 @xref{Memory Management}.
10847 @deffn {Function} yylex
10848 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10849 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10853 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10854 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10855 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10856 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10857 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10860 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10861 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10862 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10863 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10865 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10867 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10868 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10869 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10872 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10873 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10874 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10877 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10878 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10879 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10880 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10882 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10883 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10884 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10887 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10888 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10892 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10893 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10894 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10895 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10896 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10899 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10900 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10901 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10904 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10905 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10906 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
10907 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
10908 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
10909 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10910 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10913 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
10914 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10915 call this function to create a new parser.
10916 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
10917 @code{yypstate_new}}.
10918 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10919 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10922 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
10923 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10924 parse the rest of the input stream.
10925 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
10926 @code{yypull_parse}}.
10927 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10928 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10931 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
10932 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10933 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
10934 @code{yypush_parse}}.
10935 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10936 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10939 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
10940 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
10941 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
10942 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
10943 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10946 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
10947 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
10948 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
10949 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10952 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
10953 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
10954 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
10955 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
10956 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
10957 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
10958 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
10960 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
10961 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
10962 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
10963 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
10964 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
10965 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
10966 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
10969 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
10970 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
10971 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
10979 @item Accepting state
10980 A state whose only action is the accept action.
10981 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
10982 @xref{Understanding,,}.
10984 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
10985 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
10986 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
10987 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
10988 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10990 @item Consistent state
10991 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
10993 @item Context-free grammars
10994 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
10995 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
10996 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
10997 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11000 @item Default reduction
11001 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11002 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11003 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11004 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11007 @item Defaulted state
11008 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11010 @item Dynamic allocation
11011 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11012 compile time or on entry to a function.
11015 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11016 character string of length zero.
11018 @item Finite-state stack machine
11019 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11020 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11021 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11022 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11023 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11024 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11026 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11027 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11028 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11029 deterministic parsing
11030 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11031 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11032 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11036 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11037 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11038 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11040 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11041 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11042 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11043 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11044 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11045 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11046 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11047 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11048 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11049 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11051 @item Infix operator
11052 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11053 performs some operation.
11056 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11058 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11059 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11060 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11061 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11062 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11063 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11064 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11066 @item Language construct
11067 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11068 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11069 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11071 @item Left associativity
11072 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11073 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11074 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11076 @item Left recursion
11077 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11078 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11081 @item Left-to-right parsing
11082 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11083 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11085 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11086 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11087 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11089 @item Lexical tie-in
11090 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11091 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11093 @item Literal string token
11094 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11096 @item Lookahead token
11097 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11101 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11102 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11103 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11106 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11107 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11109 @item Nonterminal symbol
11110 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11111 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11112 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11115 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11116 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11119 @item Postfix operator
11120 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11121 performs some operation.
11124 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11125 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11129 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11130 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11131 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11133 @item Reverse polish notation
11134 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11136 @item Right recursion
11137 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11138 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11142 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11143 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11144 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11147 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11148 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11149 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11151 @item Single-character literal
11152 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11153 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11156 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11157 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11158 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11159 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11162 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11163 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11164 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11167 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11168 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11171 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11172 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11173 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11174 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11176 @item Terminal symbol
11177 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11178 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11179 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11181 @item Unreachable state
11182 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11183 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11184 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11187 @node Copying This Manual
11188 @appendix Copying This Manual
11192 @unnumbered Bibliography
11196 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11197 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11198 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11199 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11201 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11202 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11203 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11204 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11205 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11207 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11208 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11209 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11210 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11211 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11213 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11214 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11215 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11216 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11217 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11220 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11221 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11222 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11225 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11226 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11227 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11228 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11238 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11239 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11240 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11241 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11242 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11243 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11244 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11245 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11246 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11247 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11248 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11249 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11250 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11251 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
11252 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11253 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11254 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11255 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11256 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11257 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11258 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11259 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11260 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11261 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
11262 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11263 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11264 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11265 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11266 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11267 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11268 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
11269 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
11270 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11271 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
11272 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11273 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11274 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11275 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
11276 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11277 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
11278 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11279 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11280 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11281 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11282 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
11283 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11284 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11285 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11286 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11287 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11288 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
11289 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
11291 @c Local Variables:
11292 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"