1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2011 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser source file).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
115 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
117 The Concepts of Bison
119 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
120 as mathematical ideas.
121 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
122 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
123 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
124 the name of an identifier, etc.).
125 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
126 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
127 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
128 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
129 how is the output used?
130 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
131 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
135 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
136 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
137 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
138 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
190 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
192 Outline of a Bison Grammar
194 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
195 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
196 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
197 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
198 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
200 Defining Language Semantics
202 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
203 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
204 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
205 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
206 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
207 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
208 action in the middle of a rule.
209 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
227 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
228 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
229 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
230 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232 Parser C-Language Interface
234 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
235 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
236 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
237 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
238 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
239 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
241 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
242 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
243 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
246 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
248 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
249 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
250 of the token it has read.
251 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
252 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
254 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
255 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
257 The Bison Parser Algorithm
259 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
260 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
261 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
262 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
263 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
264 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
265 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
266 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
267 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
271 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
272 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
273 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
274 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
275 * How Precedence:: How they work.
277 Handling Context Dependencies
279 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
280 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
281 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
282 error recovery rules must be written.
284 Debugging Your Parser
286 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
287 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
291 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
292 in alphabetical order by short options.
293 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
294 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
296 Parsers Written In Other Languages
298 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
299 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
303 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
304 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
305 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
306 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
307 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
308 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
310 A Complete C++ Example
312 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
313 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
314 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
315 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
316 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
320 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
321 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
322 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
323 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
324 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
325 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
326 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
327 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
329 Frequently Asked Questions
331 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
332 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
333 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
334 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
335 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
336 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
337 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
338 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
339 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
340 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
341 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
342 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
346 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
352 @unnumbered Introduction
355 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
356 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
357 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
358 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
359 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
360 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
361 calculators to complex programming languages.
363 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
364 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
365 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
366 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
367 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
370 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
371 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
372 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
373 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
376 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
377 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
378 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
379 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
380 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
381 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
384 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
387 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
389 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
390 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
391 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
392 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
393 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
395 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
397 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
398 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
399 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
400 License to all of the Bison source code.
402 The output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser file---contains a
403 verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is the code for the
404 parser's implementation. (The actions from your grammar are inserted
405 into this implementation at one point, but most of the rest of the
406 implementation is not changed.) When we applied the GPL
407 terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
408 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
410 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
411 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
412 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
413 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
414 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
415 using the other GNU tools.
417 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
418 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
419 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
420 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
424 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
425 @include gpl-3.0.texi
428 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
430 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
431 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
432 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
435 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
436 as mathematical ideas.
437 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
438 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
439 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
440 the name of an identifier, etc.).
441 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
442 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
443 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
444 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
445 how is the output used?
446 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
447 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
450 @node Language and Grammar
451 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
453 @cindex context-free grammar
454 @cindex grammar, context-free
455 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
456 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
457 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
458 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
459 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
460 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
461 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
462 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
466 @cindex Backus-Naur form
467 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
468 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
469 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
470 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
471 essentially machine-readable BNF.
473 @cindex LALR(1) grammars
474 @cindex IELR(1) grammars
475 @cindex LR(1) grammars
476 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars.
477 Although it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is
478 optimized for what are called LR(1) grammars.
479 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to tell how to parse
480 any portion of an input string with just a single token of lookahead.
481 For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the additional
482 restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
483 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
484 more information on this.
485 As an experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
486 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables.
487 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}, to learn how.
490 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
491 @cindex ambiguous grammars
492 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
494 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
495 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
496 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
497 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
498 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
499 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
500 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
501 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
502 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
503 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
504 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
505 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
506 possible parses of any given string is finite.
508 @cindex symbols (abstract)
510 @cindex syntactic grouping
511 @cindex grouping, syntactic
512 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
513 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
514 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
515 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
516 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
517 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
518 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
520 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
521 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
522 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
523 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
524 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
525 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
526 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
527 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
528 lexicography, not grammar.)
530 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
534 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
535 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
536 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
537 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
538 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
539 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
540 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
545 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
546 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
547 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
548 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
549 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
553 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
554 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
555 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
556 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
557 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
558 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
559 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
560 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
562 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
563 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
564 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
565 reads informally as follows:
568 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
573 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
577 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
578 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
579 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
580 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
583 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
584 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
585 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
586 not the start symbol.
588 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
589 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
590 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
591 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
592 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
593 reports a syntax error.
595 @node Grammar in Bison
596 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
597 @cindex Bison grammar
598 @cindex grammar, Bison
599 @cindex formal grammar
601 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
602 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
603 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
605 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
606 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
607 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
609 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
610 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
611 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
612 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
613 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
614 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
615 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
618 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
619 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
620 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
621 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
623 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
624 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
626 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
627 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
628 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
629 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
633 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
638 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
640 @node Semantic Values
641 @section Semantic Values
642 @cindex semantic value
643 @cindex value, semantic
645 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
646 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
647 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
648 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
649 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
652 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
653 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
654 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
655 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
656 ,Defining Language Semantics},
659 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
660 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
661 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
662 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
665 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
666 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
667 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
668 need to have any semantic value.)
670 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
671 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
672 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
673 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
674 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
675 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
677 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
678 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
679 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
680 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
681 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
683 @node Semantic Actions
684 @section Semantic Actions
685 @cindex semantic actions
686 @cindex actions, semantic
688 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
689 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
690 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
691 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
694 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
695 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
696 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
697 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
698 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
699 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
700 newly recognized larger expression.
702 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
706 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
711 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
712 from the values of the two subexpressions.
715 @section Writing GLR Parsers
717 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
720 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
721 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
723 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
724 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
725 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
726 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
727 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
728 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
729 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
730 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
731 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
733 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
734 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
735 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
736 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
737 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
738 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
739 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
740 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
741 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
742 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
743 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
744 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
745 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
746 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
747 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
748 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
749 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
750 identical set of symbols.
752 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
753 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
754 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
755 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
756 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
757 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
758 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
759 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
760 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
764 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
765 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
766 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
767 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
768 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
771 @node Simple GLR Parsers
772 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
773 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
774 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
778 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
779 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
781 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
782 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
783 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
785 Consider a problem that
786 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
787 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
790 type subrange = lo .. hi;
791 type enum = (a, b, c);
795 The original language standard allows only numeric
796 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
797 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
798 10206) and many other
799 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
800 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
804 type subrange = (a) .. b;
808 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
809 type with only one value:
816 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
817 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
819 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
820 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
821 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
822 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
823 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
824 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
825 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
826 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
828 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
829 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
830 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
831 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
834 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
835 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
836 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
837 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
838 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
839 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
842 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
843 use the GLR algorithm.
844 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
845 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
846 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
847 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
848 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
849 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
850 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
851 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
852 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
854 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
855 reports a syntax error as usual.
857 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
858 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
859 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
860 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
861 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
863 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
864 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
865 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
866 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
867 The present example contains only one conflict between two
868 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
869 cannot be nested. So the number of
870 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
871 and the parsing time is still linear.
873 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
874 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
877 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
887 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
892 type : '(' id_list ')'
914 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
915 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
916 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
917 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
924 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
925 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by
926 adding these two declarations to the Bison input file (before the first
935 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
936 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
937 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
938 notice when the parser splits.
940 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
941 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
942 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
943 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
944 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
945 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
946 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
947 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
948 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
949 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
950 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
951 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
952 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
955 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
956 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
957 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
958 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
959 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
960 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
962 @node Merging GLR Parses
963 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
964 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
965 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
969 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
971 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
976 #define YYSTYPE char const *
978 void yyerror (char const *);
991 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
994 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
998 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
999 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1000 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1001 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1002 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1005 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1006 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1007 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1008 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1011 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1012 | '(' declarator ')'
1017 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1018 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1025 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1026 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1027 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1028 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1029 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1030 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1031 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1032 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1033 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1034 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1035 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1036 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1037 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1038 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1040 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1041 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1042 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1043 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1044 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1045 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1046 The parser therefore prints
1049 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1052 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1053 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1060 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1061 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1062 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1063 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1064 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1065 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1066 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1067 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1068 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1069 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1075 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1076 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1077 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1078 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1082 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1083 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1088 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1092 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1100 with an accompanying forward declaration
1101 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1105 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1106 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1111 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1112 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1115 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1118 Bison requires that all of the
1119 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1120 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1121 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1122 the offending merge.
1124 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1125 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1127 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1128 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1130 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1131 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1132 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1133 the associated reduction.
1134 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1135 action in a GLR parser.
1138 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1140 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1142 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1143 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1144 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1145 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1146 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1147 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1148 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1149 influence syntax analysis.
1150 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1153 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1154 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1155 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1156 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1157 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1158 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1159 future versions of Bison.
1160 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1161 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1162 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1164 @subsubsection YYERROR
1166 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1167 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1168 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1169 initiate error recovery.
1170 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1171 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1172 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1173 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1174 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1175 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1176 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1177 the parse that invoked the test.
1179 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1180 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1181 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1184 @node Semantic Predicates
1185 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1187 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1189 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1191 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1192 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1193 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1194 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1198 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1199 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1204 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1205 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1206 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1207 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1208 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1209 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1210 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1212 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1213 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1214 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1215 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1218 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1219 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1220 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1224 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1225 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1230 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1231 false). However, this
1232 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1233 have overlapping syntax.
1234 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1235 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1236 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1237 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1240 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1241 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1243 @node Compiler Requirements
1244 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1245 @cindex @code{inline}
1246 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1248 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1249 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1250 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1251 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1252 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1253 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1262 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1266 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1272 @node Locations Overview
1275 @cindex textual location
1276 @cindex location, textual
1278 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1279 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1280 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1281 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1283 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1284 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1285 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1286 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1288 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1289 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1290 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1293 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1294 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1295 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1296 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1297 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1298 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1299 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1302 @section Bison Output: the Parser File
1303 @cindex Bison parser
1304 @cindex Bison utility
1305 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1308 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The output
1309 is a C source file that parses the language described by the grammar.
1310 This file is called a @dfn{Bison parser}. Keep in mind that the Bison
1311 utility and the Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility
1312 is a program whose output is the Bison parser that becomes part of your
1315 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1316 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1317 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1320 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1321 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1322 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1323 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1324 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1325 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1326 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1328 The Bison parser file is C code which defines a function named
1329 @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This function does not make
1330 a complete C program: you must supply some additional functions. One is
1331 the lexical analyzer. Another is an error-reporting function which the
1332 parser calls to report an error. In addition, a complete C program must
1333 start with a function called @code{main}; you have to provide this, and
1334 arrange for it to call @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run.
1335 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
1337 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1338 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser file itself
1339 begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface functions
1340 such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the error reporting
1341 function @code{yyerror} and the parser function @code{yyparse} itself.
1342 This also includes numerous identifiers used for internal purposes.
1343 Therefore, you should avoid using C identifiers starting with @samp{yy}
1344 or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar file except for the ones defined in
1345 this manual. Also, you should avoid using the C identifiers
1346 @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for anything other than their usual
1349 In some cases the Bison parser file includes system headers, and in
1350 those cases your code should respect the identifiers reserved by those
1351 headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>}, @code{<malloc.h>},
1352 @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are included as needed to
1353 declare memory allocators and related types. @code{<libintl.h>} is
1354 included if message translation is in use
1355 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may
1356 be included if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value
1357 (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1360 @section Stages in Using Bison
1361 @cindex stages in using Bison
1364 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1365 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1369 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1370 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1371 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1372 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1373 sequence of C statements.
1376 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1377 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1378 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1379 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1382 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1385 Write error-reporting routines.
1388 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1389 must follow these steps:
1393 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1396 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1399 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1402 @node Grammar Layout
1403 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1404 @cindex grammar file
1406 @cindex format of grammar file
1407 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1409 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1410 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1417 @var{Bison declarations}
1426 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1427 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1429 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1430 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1431 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1432 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1433 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1434 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1436 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1437 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1438 semantic values of various symbols.
1440 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1443 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1444 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1445 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1449 @cindex simple examples
1450 @cindex examples, simple
1452 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1453 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1454 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1455 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1456 desk-top calculator.
1458 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1459 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1460 source file to try them.
1463 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1464 a first example with no operator precedence.
1465 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1466 Operator precedence is introduced.
1467 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1468 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1469 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1470 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1471 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1475 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1476 @cindex reverse polish notation
1477 @cindex polish notation calculator
1478 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1479 @cindex calculator, simple
1481 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1482 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1483 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1484 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1486 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1487 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison input files.
1490 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1491 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1492 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1493 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1494 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1495 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1496 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1499 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1500 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1502 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1503 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1506 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1509 #define YYSTYPE double
1512 void yyerror (char const *);
1517 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1520 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1521 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1523 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1524 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1525 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1526 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1527 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1528 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1529 which is a floating point number.
1531 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1532 function @code{pow}.
1534 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1535 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1536 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1537 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1540 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1541 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1542 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1543 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1544 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1545 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1546 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1547 type for numeric constants.
1550 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1552 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1560 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1563 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1564 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1565 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1566 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1567 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1568 /* Exponentiation */
1569 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1571 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1576 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1577 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1578 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1579 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1580 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1583 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1584 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1585 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1587 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1588 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1589 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1590 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1591 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1592 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1601 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1603 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1611 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1612 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1613 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1614 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1615 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1617 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1618 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1619 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1620 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1621 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1622 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1624 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1625 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1626 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1627 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1630 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1631 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1632 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1635 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1637 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1641 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1645 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1646 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1647 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1648 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1649 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1650 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1651 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1653 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1654 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1655 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1656 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1657 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1660 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1662 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1663 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1664 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1665 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1669 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1670 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1675 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1676 equally well have written them separately:
1680 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1681 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1685 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1686 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1687 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1688 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1689 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1690 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1691 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1692 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1694 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1695 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1696 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1698 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1699 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1703 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1707 means the same thing as this:
1711 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1717 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1720 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1721 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1722 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1724 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1725 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1726 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1727 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1729 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1731 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1732 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1733 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1734 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1736 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1737 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1738 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1739 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1740 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1741 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1742 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1743 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1744 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1746 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1747 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1748 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1749 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1750 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1752 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1753 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1755 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1759 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1760 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1761 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1762 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1773 /* Skip white space. */
1774 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1778 /* Process numbers. */
1779 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1782 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1787 /* Return end-of-input. */
1790 /* Return a single char. */
1797 @subsection The Controlling Function
1798 @cindex controlling function
1799 @cindex main function in simple example
1801 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1802 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1803 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1816 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1817 @cindex error reporting routine
1819 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1820 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1821 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1822 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1823 here is the definition we will use:
1829 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1831 yyerror (char const *s)
1833 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1838 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1839 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1840 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1841 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1842 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1843 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1845 @node Rpcalc Generate
1846 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1847 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1849 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1850 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1851 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file. The
1852 definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} go at the
1853 end, in the epilogue of the file
1854 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1856 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1857 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1859 With all the source in a single file, you use the following command to
1860 convert it into a parser file:
1867 In this example the file was called @file{rpcalc.y} (for ``Reverse Polish
1868 @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c},
1869 removing the @samp{.y} from the original file name. The file output by
1870 Bison contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional
1871 functions in the input file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main})
1872 are copied verbatim to the output.
1874 @node Rpcalc Compile
1875 @subsection Compiling the Parser File
1876 @cindex compiling the parser
1878 Here is how to compile and run the parser file:
1882 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1884 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1888 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1889 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1890 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1894 # @r{List files again.}
1896 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1900 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1901 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1907 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1909 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1913 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1915 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1920 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1921 @cindex infix notation calculator
1923 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1925 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1926 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1927 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1928 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1931 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1934 #define YYSTYPE double
1938 void yyerror (char const *);
1941 /* Bison declarations. */
1945 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1946 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1948 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1954 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1957 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1958 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1959 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1960 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1961 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1962 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1963 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1964 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1970 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1973 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1975 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1976 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1977 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1978 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1979 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1980 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1981 the associativity/precedence.)
1983 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1984 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1985 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1986 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1987 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
1988 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1991 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1992 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1993 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1994 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1995 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1997 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2002 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2010 @node Simple Error Recovery
2011 @section Simple Error Recovery
2012 @cindex error recovery, simple
2014 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2015 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2016 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2017 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2018 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2019 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2021 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2022 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2023 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2028 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2029 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2034 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2035 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2036 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2037 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2038 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2039 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2040 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2041 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2044 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2045 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2046 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2047 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2048 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2049 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2052 @node Location Tracking Calc
2053 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2054 @cindex location tracking calculator
2055 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2056 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2058 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2059 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2060 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2061 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2065 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2066 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2067 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2070 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2071 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2073 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2074 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2077 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2083 void yyerror (char const *);
2086 /* Bison declarations. */
2094 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2098 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2099 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2100 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2101 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2102 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2103 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2104 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2108 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2110 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2111 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2112 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2113 from the new information.
2115 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2116 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2127 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2132 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2133 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2134 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2135 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2145 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2146 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2147 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2152 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2153 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2154 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2158 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2159 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2160 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2162 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2163 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2164 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2165 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2166 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2167 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2171 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2173 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2174 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2175 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2178 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2179 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2190 /* Skip white space. */
2191 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2192 ++yylloc.last_column;
2197 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2198 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2202 /* Process numbers. */
2206 ++yylloc.last_column;
2207 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2209 ++yylloc.last_column;
2210 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2217 /* Return end-of-input. */
2221 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2225 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2228 ++yylloc.last_column;
2233 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2234 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2235 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2236 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2238 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2239 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2240 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2241 controlling function:
2248 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2249 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2255 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2256 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2257 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2259 @node Multi-function Calc
2260 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2261 @cindex multi-function calculator
2262 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2263 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2265 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2266 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2267 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2268 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2269 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2271 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2272 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2273 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2274 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2275 functions whose syntax has this form:
2278 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2282 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2283 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2284 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2288 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2292 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2298 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2303 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2306 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2307 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2308 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2311 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2312 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2314 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2319 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2320 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2322 void yyerror (char const *);
2327 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2328 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2331 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2332 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2339 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2340 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2342 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2345 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2346 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2347 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2349 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2350 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2351 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2352 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2354 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2355 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2356 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2357 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2358 between angle brackets).
2360 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2361 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2362 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2363 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2364 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2365 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2368 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2370 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2371 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2372 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2384 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2385 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2390 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2391 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2392 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2393 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2394 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2395 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2396 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2397 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2398 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2399 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2400 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2403 /* End of grammar. */
2407 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2408 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2409 @cindex symbol table example
2411 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2412 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2413 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2414 requires some additional C functions for support.
2416 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2417 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2418 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2422 /* Function type. */
2423 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2427 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2430 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2431 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2434 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2435 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2437 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2442 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2444 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2445 extern symrec *sym_table;
2447 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2448 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2452 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2453 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2454 @code{init_table} as well:
2460 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2462 yyerror (char const *s)
2472 double (*fnct) (double);
2477 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2490 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2495 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2501 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2503 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2504 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2519 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2520 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2522 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2523 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2524 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2525 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2526 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2527 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2531 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2534 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2535 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2536 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2537 ptr->type = sym_type;
2538 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2539 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2545 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2548 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2549 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2550 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2556 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2557 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2558 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2559 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2561 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2562 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2563 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2564 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2565 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2566 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2568 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2569 operators in @code{yylex}.
2582 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2583 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2590 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2591 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2594 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2600 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2604 static char *symbuf = 0;
2605 static int length = 0;
2610 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2611 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2613 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2620 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2624 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2626 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2628 /* Get another character. */
2633 while (isalnum (c));
2640 s = getsym (symbuf);
2642 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2647 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2653 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2654 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2655 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2663 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2666 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2667 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2668 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2671 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2672 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2676 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2678 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2679 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2681 The Bison grammar input file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2682 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2685 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2686 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2687 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2688 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2689 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2690 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2691 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2692 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2695 @node Grammar Outline
2696 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2698 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2699 appropriate delimiters:
2706 @var{Bison declarations}
2715 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2716 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2717 continues until end of line.
2720 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2721 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2722 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2723 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2724 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2728 @subsection The prologue
2729 @cindex declarations section
2731 @cindex declarations
2733 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2734 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2735 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser file so that
2736 they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can use
2737 @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If you
2738 don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2739 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2741 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2742 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2745 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2746 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2747 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2748 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2749 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2750 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2751 @code{%union} declaration.
2762 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2766 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2767 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2773 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2774 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2775 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2776 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2777 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2778 @code{#include} directives.
2780 @node Prologue Alternatives
2781 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2782 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2785 @findex %code requires
2786 @findex %code provides
2789 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2791 As an alternative, Bison provides a %code directive with an explicit qualifier
2792 field, which identifies the purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where
2793 Bison should generate it.
2794 For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default location, or it can be
2795 one of @code{requires}, @code{provides}, @code{top}.
2796 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
2798 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2809 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2813 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2814 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2821 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a subtle
2822 distinction between their functionality.
2823 For example, if you decide to override Bison's default definition for
2824 @code{YYLTYPE}, in which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new
2826 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code into the
2827 parser source code file @emph{before} the default @code{YYLTYPE} definition.
2828 In which @var{Prologue} section should you prototype an internal function,
2829 @code{trace_token}, that accepts @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as
2831 You should prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2832 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2834 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2835 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2836 This behavior raises a few questions.
2837 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2838 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2839 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2840 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2841 This behavior is not intuitive.
2843 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2844 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2845 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2846 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2853 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2854 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2857 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2858 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2870 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2874 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2875 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2876 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2883 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2884 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2885 explicit which kind you intend.
2886 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2888 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts.
2889 The first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2890 parser source code file.
2891 The first line after the warning is required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also
2892 needs to appear in the parser source code file.
2893 However, if you've instructed Bison to generate a parser header file
2894 (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably want that line to appear before
2895 the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that header file as well.
2896 The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear in the parser header file to
2897 override the default @code{YYLTYPE} definition there.
2899 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2900 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2902 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2915 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2919 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2920 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2931 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2932 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2933 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2940 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new @code{YYLTYPE}
2941 definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2942 definitions in both the parser source code file and the parser header file.
2943 (By the same reasoning, @code{%code requires} would also be the appropriate
2944 place to write your own definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2946 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}, you
2947 should prefer @code{%code requires} over @code{%code top} regardless of whether
2948 you instruct Bison to generate a parser header file.
2949 When you are writing code that you need Bison to insert only into the parser
2950 source code file and that has no special need to appear at the top of that
2951 file, you should prefer the unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}.
2952 These practices will make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to
2953 Bison and to other developers reading your grammar file.
2954 Following these practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and
2955 @code{%code requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2958 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to provide
2959 @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your parser.
2960 Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into both the parser
2961 header file and the parser source code file.
2962 Since this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2963 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2964 @code{%code requires}.
2965 More importantly, since it depends upon @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype},
2966 @code{%code requires} is not sufficient.
2967 Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified @code{%code} to a
2968 @code{%code provides}:
2981 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2985 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2986 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2997 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3001 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3002 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3009 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the parser header
3010 file and the parser source code file after the definitions for
3011 @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYSTYPE}.
3013 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that reflects
3014 the layout of the generated parser source code and header files:
3015 @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, and then
3017 While your grammar files may generally be easier to read if you also follow
3018 this order, Bison does not require it.
3019 Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense to you.
3021 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3022 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3023 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3024 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3026 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3027 organize your grammar file.
3028 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3032 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3033 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3034 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3035 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
3037 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3038 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3039 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3040 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
3044 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3045 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3047 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3049 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3050 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3051 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3052 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3054 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3055 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3056 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3057 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3058 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3059 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3060 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3061 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3064 @node Bison Declarations
3065 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3066 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3067 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3069 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3070 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3071 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3072 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3075 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3076 @cindex grammar rules section
3077 @cindex rules section for grammar
3079 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3080 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3082 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3083 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3084 if it is the first thing in the file.
3087 @subsection The epilogue
3088 @cindex additional C code section
3090 @cindex C code, section for additional
3092 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser file, just as
3093 the @var{Prologue} is copied to the beginning. This is the most convenient
3094 place to put anything that you want to have in the parser file but which need
3095 not come before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the
3096 definitions of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because
3097 C requires functions to be declared before being used, you often need
3098 to declare functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue,
3099 even if you define them in the Epilogue.
3100 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
3102 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3103 from the grammar rules.
3105 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3106 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3107 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3108 of the grammar file.
3111 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3112 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3113 @cindex terminal symbol
3117 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3120 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3121 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3122 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3123 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3124 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3125 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3126 the symbol to stand for it.
3128 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3129 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3130 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3132 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3133 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3134 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3135 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3136 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3137 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3138 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3140 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3144 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3145 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3146 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3147 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3150 @cindex character token
3151 @cindex literal token
3152 @cindex single-character literal
3153 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3154 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3155 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3156 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3157 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3158 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3159 ,Operator Precedence}).
3161 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3162 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3163 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3164 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3165 your program will confuse other readers.
3167 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3168 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3169 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3170 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3171 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3172 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3176 @cindex string token
3177 @cindex literal string token
3178 @cindex multicharacter literal
3179 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3180 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3181 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3182 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3183 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3185 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3186 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3187 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3188 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3189 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3191 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3193 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3194 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3195 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3196 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3197 read your program will be confused.
3199 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3200 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3201 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3202 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3203 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3204 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3207 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3208 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3209 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3211 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3212 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3213 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3214 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3215 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3216 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3217 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3218 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3219 Each named token type becomes a C macro in
3220 the parser file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code.
3221 (This is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.)
3222 @xref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3224 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3225 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3226 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3227 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3228 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3230 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3231 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3232 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3233 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3234 characters in the following C-language string:
3237 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3240 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3241 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3242 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3243 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3244 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3245 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3246 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3247 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3248 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3249 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3252 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3253 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3254 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3255 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3256 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3259 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3261 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3262 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3264 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3268 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3274 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3275 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3276 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3288 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3289 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3291 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3292 extra white space as you wish.
3294 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3295 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3298 @{@var{C statements}@}
3303 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3304 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3305 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3306 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3307 copies the code to the output file, where the C compiler can check it.
3309 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3310 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3311 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3312 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3313 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3314 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3315 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3316 character constants.
3318 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3322 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3323 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3327 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3328 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3335 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3337 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3338 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3339 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3356 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3360 @section Recursive Rules
3361 @cindex recursive rule
3363 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3364 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3365 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3366 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3367 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3377 @cindex left recursion
3378 @cindex right recursion
3380 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3381 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3382 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3393 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3394 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3395 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3396 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3397 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3398 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3399 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3402 @cindex mutual recursion
3403 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3404 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3405 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3413 | primary '+' primary
3425 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3429 @section Defining Language Semantics
3430 @cindex defining language semantics
3431 @cindex language semantics, defining
3433 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3434 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3435 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3437 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3438 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3439 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3440 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3443 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3444 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3445 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3446 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3447 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3448 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3449 action in the middle of a rule.
3450 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
3454 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3455 @cindex semantic value type
3456 @cindex value type, semantic
3457 @cindex data types of semantic values
3458 @cindex default data type
3460 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3461 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3462 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3463 Notation Calculator}).
3465 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3466 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3467 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3470 #define YYSTYPE double
3474 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3475 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3476 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3477 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3479 @node Multiple Types
3480 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3482 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3483 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3484 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3485 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3488 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3489 requires you to do two things:
3493 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3494 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3495 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3496 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3500 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3501 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3502 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3503 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3504 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3513 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3515 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3516 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3517 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3518 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3520 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3521 placed at any position in the rule;
3522 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3523 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3524 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3525 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3527 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the components
3528 matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}}, which stands for
3529 the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic value for the grouping
3530 being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition, the semantic values of
3531 symbols can be accessed with the named references construct
3532 @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}. Bison translates both of these
3533 constructs into expressions of the appropriate type when it copies the
3534 actions into the parser file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it
3535 stands for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable
3536 lvalue, so it can be assigned to.
3538 Here is a typical example:
3548 Or, in terms of named references:
3552 exp[result]: @dots{}
3553 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3554 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3559 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3560 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3561 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3562 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3563 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3564 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3566 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3567 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3568 referred to as @code{$2}.
3570 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
3571 about using the named references construct.
3573 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3574 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3575 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3576 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3577 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3581 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3585 @cindex default action
3586 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3587 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3588 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3589 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3590 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3591 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3593 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3594 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3595 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3596 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3597 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3601 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3602 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3608 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3613 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3614 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3615 definition of @code{foo}.
3618 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3619 any, from a semantic action.
3620 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3621 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3624 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3625 @cindex action data types
3626 @cindex data types in actions
3628 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3629 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3631 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3632 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3633 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3634 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3635 in the rule. In this example,
3646 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3647 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3648 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3649 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3651 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3652 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3653 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3665 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3666 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3668 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3669 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3670 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3671 @cindex mid-rule actions
3673 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3674 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3675 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3677 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3678 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3679 it is run before they are parsed.
3681 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3682 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3683 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3684 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3687 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3688 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3689 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3690 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3691 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3692 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3694 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3695 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3696 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3697 at the end of the rule.
3699 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3700 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3701 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3702 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3703 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3704 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3708 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3709 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3710 declare_variable ($3); @}
3712 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3717 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3718 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3719 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3720 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3721 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3722 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3723 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3724 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3726 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3727 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3728 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3729 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3730 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3733 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3734 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3735 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3736 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3737 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3739 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3740 Discarded Symbols}).
3741 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3742 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3744 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3745 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3750 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3756 pop_context ($1); @}
3759 let: LET '(' var ')'
3760 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3761 declare_variable ($3); @}
3768 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3769 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3770 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3772 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3773 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3774 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3775 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3776 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3781 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3782 | '@{' statements '@}'
3788 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3792 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3793 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3796 | '@{' statements '@}'
3802 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3803 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3804 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3805 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3806 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3807 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3809 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3810 actions into the two rules, like this:
3814 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3815 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3816 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3817 '@{' statements '@}'
3823 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3824 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3826 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3827 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3828 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3832 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3833 declarations statements '@}'
3834 | '@{' statements '@}'
3840 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3841 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3843 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3844 serves as a subroutine:
3848 subroutine: /* empty */
3849 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3855 compound: subroutine
3856 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3858 '@{' statements '@}'
3864 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3865 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3867 @node Named References
3868 @subsection Using Named References
3869 @cindex named references
3871 While every semantic value can be accessed with positional references
3872 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$}, it's often much more convenient to refer to
3873 them by name. First of all, original symbol names may be used as named
3874 references. For example:
3878 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3879 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
3884 The positional @code{$$}, @code{@@$}, @code{$n}, and @code{@@n} can be
3885 mixed with @code{$name} and @code{@@name} arbitrarily. For example:
3889 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3890 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
3895 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
3901 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
3904 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
3907 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
3912 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
3913 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
3914 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
3917 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
3918 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
3923 Explicit names may be declared for RHS and for LHS symbols as well. In order
3924 to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an explicit name
3925 may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the closing brace of
3926 the mid-rule action code:
3929 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
3930 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
3936 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
3937 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
3940 if-stmt: IF '(' expr ')' THEN then.stmt ';'
3941 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
3945 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
3946 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
3947 @code{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
3948 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @samp{suffix} field of the semantic
3949 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @code{name.suffix} in its entirety
3950 as the name of a semantic value, bracketed syntax @code{$[name.suffix]}
3955 @section Tracking Locations
3957 @cindex textual location
3958 @cindex location, textual
3960 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3961 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3962 especially symbol locations.
3964 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3965 actions to take when rules are matched.
3968 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3969 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3970 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3974 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3975 @cindex data type of locations
3976 @cindex default location type
3978 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3979 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3981 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3982 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3983 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3984 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3988 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3997 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3998 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3999 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4000 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4001 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4003 @node Actions and Locations
4004 @subsection Actions and Locations
4005 @cindex location actions
4006 @cindex actions, location
4009 @vindex @@@var{name}
4010 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4012 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4013 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4015 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4016 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4017 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4018 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4019 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4022 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4023 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4024 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
4025 about using the named references construct.
4027 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4034 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4035 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4036 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4037 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4044 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4045 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4046 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4052 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4053 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4054 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4057 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4058 example above simply rewrites this way:
4071 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4072 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4073 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4080 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4081 from a semantic action.
4082 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4083 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4085 @node Location Default Action
4086 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4087 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4088 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4090 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4091 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4092 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4093 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4094 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4095 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4096 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4097 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4100 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4101 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4103 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4104 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4105 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4106 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4107 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4108 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4109 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4110 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4111 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4112 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4114 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4118 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
4122 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4123 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4124 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4125 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4129 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
4130 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4131 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
4132 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4138 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4139 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4140 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4142 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4146 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4147 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4150 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4151 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4152 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4153 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4156 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4157 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4158 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4159 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4163 @section Bison Declarations
4164 @cindex declarations, Bison
4165 @cindex Bison declarations
4167 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4168 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4171 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4172 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4173 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4174 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4176 The first rule in the file also specifies the start symbol, by default.
4177 If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you must declare
4178 it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
4182 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4183 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4184 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4185 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4186 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4187 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4188 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4189 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4190 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4191 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4192 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4193 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4197 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4198 @cindex version requirement
4199 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4202 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4203 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4207 %require "@var{version}"
4211 @subsection Token Type Names
4212 @cindex declaring token type names
4213 @cindex token type names, declaring
4214 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4217 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4223 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4224 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4225 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4227 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4228 @code{%precedence}, or
4229 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4230 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4233 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4234 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4235 following the token name:
4239 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4243 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4244 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4245 with each other or with normal characters.
4247 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4248 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4249 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4250 Than One Value Type}).
4256 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4260 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4264 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4265 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4266 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4273 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4274 equivalent literal string tokens:
4277 %token <operator> OR "||"
4278 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4283 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4284 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4285 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4286 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4287 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4288 the literal string instead of the token name.
4290 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4291 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4295 %token END 0 "end of file"
4298 @node Precedence Decl
4299 @subsection Operator Precedence
4300 @cindex precedence declarations
4301 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4302 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4304 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4305 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4306 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4307 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4308 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4309 operator precedence.
4311 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4312 @code{%token}: either
4315 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4322 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4325 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4326 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4327 all the @var{symbols}:
4331 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4332 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4333 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4334 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4335 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4336 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4337 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4338 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4339 considered a syntax error.
4341 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4342 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4343 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4346 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4347 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4348 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4349 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4350 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4353 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4354 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4355 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4356 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4361 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4362 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4366 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4367 @cindex declaring value types
4368 @cindex value types, declaring
4371 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4372 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4373 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4388 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4389 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4390 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4391 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4393 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4394 @code{union}. For example:
4406 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4407 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4410 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4411 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4412 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4414 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4415 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4417 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4418 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4419 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4420 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4428 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4433 and then your grammar can use the following
4434 instead of @code{%union}:
4447 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4448 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4449 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4453 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4454 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4455 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4458 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4462 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4463 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4464 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4465 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4466 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4469 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4470 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4471 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4472 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4474 @node Initial Action Decl
4475 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4476 @findex %initial-action
4478 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4479 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4482 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4483 @findex %initial-action
4484 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4485 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4486 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4487 @code{%parse-param}.
4490 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4493 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4496 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4501 @node Destructor Decl
4502 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4503 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4507 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4508 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4509 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4510 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4511 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4512 must discard the start symbol.
4514 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4515 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4516 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4517 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4519 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4520 symbol is automatically discarded.
4522 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4524 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4526 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4527 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4528 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4529 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4531 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4532 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4533 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4534 tag among @var{symbols}.
4535 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4536 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4537 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4539 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4540 (These default forms are experimental.
4541 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4543 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4544 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4545 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4546 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4548 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4549 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4550 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4551 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4552 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4559 %union @{ char *string; @}
4560 %token <string> STRING1
4561 %token <string> STRING2
4562 %type <string> string1
4563 %type <string> string2
4564 %union @{ char character; @}
4565 %token <character> CHR
4566 %type <character> chr
4569 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4570 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4571 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4572 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4576 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4577 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4578 to @code{free} by default.
4579 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4580 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4581 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4582 @code{free} only once.
4583 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4584 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4586 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4587 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4588 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4589 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4590 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4591 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4592 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4593 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4594 reference it in your grammar.
4595 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4596 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4602 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4603 @cindex mid-rule actions
4604 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4605 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4606 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you do
4607 not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}} (where
4608 @var{n} is the RHS symbol position of the mid-rule) in any later action in that
4610 However, if you do reference either, the Bison-generated parser will invoke the
4611 @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4615 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4616 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4617 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4622 @cindex discarded symbols
4623 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4627 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4629 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4631 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4632 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4634 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4637 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4638 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4641 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4642 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4643 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4647 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4648 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4649 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4650 @cindex warnings, preventing
4651 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4655 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4656 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4657 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4658 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4659 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4660 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4662 The declaration looks like this:
4668 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4669 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4670 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4671 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4673 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4674 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4675 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4676 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4677 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4678 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4679 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4685 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4689 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4690 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4691 print the number of conflicts.
4694 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4695 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4696 go back to the beginning.
4699 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4700 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4701 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4704 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4705 but will keep silent otherwise.
4708 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4709 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4710 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4711 @cindex default start symbol
4714 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4715 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4716 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4723 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4724 @cindex reentrant parser
4726 @findex %define api.pure
4728 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4729 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4730 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4731 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4732 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4733 program must be called only within interlocks.
4735 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4736 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4737 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4738 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4739 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4741 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4742 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4743 reentrant. It looks like this:
4749 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4750 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4751 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4752 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4753 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4754 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4755 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4756 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4757 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4759 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4760 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4764 @subsection A Push Parser
4767 @findex %define api.push-pull
4769 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4770 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4772 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4773 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4774 each time a new token is made available.
4776 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4777 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4778 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4779 within a certain time period.
4781 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4782 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4783 parser (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%define api.push-pull}):
4786 %define api.push-pull push
4789 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4790 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4791 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4792 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4793 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4797 %define api.push-pull push
4800 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4801 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4802 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4803 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4805 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4806 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4807 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4808 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4809 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4810 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4811 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4812 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4816 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4818 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4819 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4820 yypstate_delete (ps);
4823 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4824 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4825 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4826 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4827 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4828 example would thus look like this:
4833 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4836 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4837 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4838 yypstate_delete (ps);
4841 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4842 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4844 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4845 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4846 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4847 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4848 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4849 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4850 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4851 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4852 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4853 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4854 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4855 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4856 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4857 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4858 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4859 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4860 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4864 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4865 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4866 yypstate_delete (ps);
4869 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4870 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4871 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
4874 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4875 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4876 @cindex declaration summary
4877 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4879 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4881 @deffn {Directive} %union
4882 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4883 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4886 @deffn {Directive} %token
4887 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4888 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4891 @deffn {Directive} %right
4892 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4893 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4896 @deffn {Directive} %left
4897 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4898 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4901 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4902 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4903 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4904 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4908 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4909 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4910 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4914 @deffn {Directive} %type
4915 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4916 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4919 @deffn {Directive} %start
4920 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4924 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4925 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4926 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4932 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4935 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4937 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4938 It inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location in the
4939 output@footnote{The default location is actually skeleton-dependent;
4940 writers of non-standard skeletons however should choose the default location
4941 consistently with the behavior of the standard Bison skeletons.}.
4944 For C/C++, the default location is the parser source code
4945 file after the usual contents of the parser header file.
4946 Thus, @code{%code} replaces the traditional Yacc prologue,
4947 @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}, for most purposes.
4948 For a detailed discussion, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
4950 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
4953 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4954 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4955 If you need to specify location-sensitive verbatim @var{code} that does not
4956 belong at the default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form,
4957 use this form instead.
4959 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the location(s)
4960 where Bison should generate it.
4961 Not all @var{qualifier}s are accepted for all target languages.
4962 Unaccepted @var{qualifier}s produce an error.
4963 Some of the accepted @var{qualifier}s are:
4967 @findex %code requires
4970 @item Language(s): C, C++
4972 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
4973 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
4974 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
4975 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
4976 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4978 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser source code file
4979 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4983 @findex %code provides
4986 @item Language(s): C, C++
4988 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
4989 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
4991 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser source code file after
4992 the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and token definitions.
4999 @item Language(s): C, C++
5001 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires} should
5002 usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}.
5003 However, occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5004 parser source code file.
5014 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser source code file.
5018 @findex %code imports
5021 @item Language(s): Java
5023 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5025 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5026 before any class definitions.
5031 For a detailed discussion of how to use @code{%code} in place of the
5032 traditional Yacc prologue for C/C++, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5035 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5036 Instrument the output parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5038 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5041 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5042 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5043 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5044 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
5046 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define} multiple
5047 times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5049 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any character
5050 other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash or digit.
5052 Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent to specifying
5055 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values.
5056 In this case, Bison will complain if the variable definition does not meet one
5057 of the following four conditions:
5060 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5062 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5063 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5065 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5067 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5068 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5071 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5072 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5073 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5074 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5075 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5076 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5079 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5081 @findex %define api.namespace
5083 @item Languages(s): C++
5085 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5086 For example, if you specify:
5089 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5092 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5095 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5098 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5099 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5102 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5108 @item Accepted Values:
5109 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5110 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5112 @item Default Value:
5113 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5114 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5115 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5116 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5117 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5118 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5119 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5122 %define api.namespace "foo"
5123 %name-prefix "bar::"
5126 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5133 @c ================================================== api.pure
5135 @findex %define api.pure
5138 @item Language(s): C
5140 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5141 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5143 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5145 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5151 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5153 @findex %define api.push-pull
5156 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5158 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5159 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5160 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5161 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5163 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5165 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5171 @c ================================================== api.tokens.prefix
5172 @item api.tokens.prefix
5173 @findex %define api.tokens.prefix
5176 @item Languages(s): all
5179 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5180 target language. For instance
5183 %token FILE for ERROR
5184 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
5186 start: FILE for ERROR;
5190 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5191 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5192 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5193 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5194 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5195 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5196 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5198 @item Accepted Values:
5199 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5200 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5201 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5203 @item Default Value:
5206 @c api.tokens.prefix
5209 @c ================================================== lex_symbol
5211 @findex %define lex_symbol
5218 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5219 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5220 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5222 @item Accepted Values:
5225 @item Default Value:
5231 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5233 @item lr.default-reductions
5234 @cindex default reductions
5235 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5236 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5237 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5242 @item Language(s): all
5244 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5245 contain default reductions.
5246 That is, in such a state, Bison selects the reduction with the largest
5247 lookahead set to be the default parser action and then removes that
5249 (The ability to specify where default reductions should be used is
5251 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5253 @item Accepted Values:
5256 This is the traditional Bison behavior.
5257 The main advantage is a significant decrease in the size of the parser
5259 The disadvantage is that, when the generated parser encounters a
5260 syntactically unacceptable token, the parser might then perform
5261 unnecessary default reductions before it can detect the syntax error.
5262 Such delayed syntax error detection is usually inherent in
5263 LALR and IELR parser tables anyway due to
5264 LR state merging (@pxref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}).
5265 Furthermore, the use of @code{%nonassoc} can contribute to delayed
5266 syntax error detection even in the case of canonical LR.
5267 As an experimental feature, delayed syntax error detection can be
5268 overcome in all cases by enabling LAC (@pxref{Decl
5269 Summary,,parse.lac}, for details, including a discussion of the effects
5270 of delayed syntax error detection).
5272 @item @code{consistent}.
5273 @cindex consistent states
5274 A consistent state is a state that has only one possible action.
5275 If that action is a reduction, then the parser does not need to request
5276 a lookahead token from the scanner before performing that action.
5277 However, the parser recognizes the ability to ignore the lookahead token
5278 in this way only when such a reduction is encoded as a default
5280 Thus, if default reductions are permitted only in consistent states,
5281 then a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5282 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{needs} the
5283 syntactically unacceptable token from the scanner.
5285 @item @code{accepting}.
5286 @cindex accepting state
5287 In the accepting state, the default reduction is actually the accept
5289 In this case, a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5290 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{reaches} the
5291 syntactically unacceptable token in the input.
5292 That is, it does not perform any extra reductions.
5295 @item Default Value:
5297 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5298 @item @code{all} otherwise.
5302 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5304 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5305 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5308 @item Language(s): all
5310 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5311 remain in the parser tables.
5312 Bison considers a state to be unreachable if there exists no sequence of
5313 transitions from the start state to that state.
5314 A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison disables a
5315 shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
5316 Keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful for analysis purposes, but they
5317 are useless in the generated parser.
5319 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5321 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5327 @item Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in
5329 Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are irrelevant to
5330 your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are relevant.
5331 Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a parser table
5332 analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this behavior will likely
5333 remain in future Bison releases.
5335 @item While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
5336 remove other kinds of useless states.
5337 Specifically, when Bison disables reduce actions during conflict resolution,
5338 some goto actions may become useless, and thus some additional states may
5340 If Bison were to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those
5341 actions, it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those
5343 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
5346 @c lr.keep-unreachable-states
5348 @c ================================================== lr.type
5351 @findex %define lr.type
5357 @item Language(s): all
5359 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5361 (This feature is experimental.
5362 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5364 @item Accepted Values:
5367 While Bison generates LALR parser tables by default for
5368 historical reasons, IELR or canonical LR is almost
5369 always preferable for deterministic parsers.
5370 The trouble is that LALR parser tables can suffer from
5371 mysterious conflicts and thus may not accept the full set of sentences
5372 that IELR and canonical LR accept.
5373 @xref{Mystery Conflicts}, for details.
5374 However, there are at least two scenarios where LALR may be
5377 @cindex GLR with LALR
5378 @item When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you
5379 do not resolve any conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left}
5380 or @code{%prec}), then the parser explores all potential parses of any
5382 In this case, the use of LALR parser tables is guaranteed not
5383 to alter the language accepted by the parser.
5384 LALR parser tables are the smallest parser tables Bison can
5385 currently generate, so they may be preferable.
5386 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically,
5387 GLR begins to behave more like a deterministic parser, and so
5388 IELR and canonical LR can be helpful to avoid
5389 LALR's mysterious behavior.
5391 @item Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar
5392 with a major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or
5393 canonical LR parser table generation algorithm.
5394 LALR can be a quick way to generate parser tables in order to
5395 investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle differences
5396 from IELR and canonical LR.
5400 IELR is a minimal LR algorithm.
5401 That is, given any grammar (LR or non-LR),
5402 IELR and canonical LR always accept exactly the same
5404 However, as for LALR, the number of parser states is often an
5405 order of magnitude less for IELR than for canonical
5407 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states
5408 may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR
5409 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR is often an order
5410 of magnitude less as well.
5411 This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar.
5413 @item @code{canonical-lr}.
5414 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5415 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5418 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an
5419 interesting means to explore a grammar because they have a property that
5420 IELR and LALR tables do not.
5421 That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are left
5422 disabled (@pxref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}), then, for every
5423 left context of every canonical LR state, the set of tokens
5424 accepted by that state is guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that
5425 is syntactically acceptable in that left context.
5426 It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR parsers
5427 in production is that, under the above constraints, they are guaranteed
5428 to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing any
5429 unnecessary reductions.
5430 However, IELR parsers using LAC (@pxref{Decl
5431 Summary,,parse.lac}) are also able to achieve this behavior without
5432 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or default reductions.
5435 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5439 @c ================================================== namespace
5441 @findex %define namespace
5442 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5446 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5448 @findex %define parse.assert
5451 @item Languages(s): C++
5453 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5454 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5456 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5458 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5460 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5465 @c ================================================== parse.error
5467 @findex %define parse.error
5472 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5473 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5475 @item Accepted Values:
5478 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5480 @item @code{verbose}
5481 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected
5485 @item Default Value:
5491 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5493 @findex %define parse.lac
5495 @cindex lookahead correction
5498 @item Languages(s): C
5500 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5501 syntax error handling.
5503 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer
5504 from a couple of problems upon encountering a syntax error. First, the
5505 parser might perform additional parser stack reductions before
5506 discovering the syntax error. Such reductions perform user semantic
5507 actions that are unexpected because they are based on an invalid token,
5508 and they cause error recovery to begin in a different syntactic context
5509 than the one in which the invalid token was encountered. Second, when
5510 verbose error messages are enabled (with @code{%error-verbose} or
5511 @code{#define YYERROR_VERBOSE}), the expected token list in the syntax
5512 error message can both contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
5514 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default
5515 reductions in inconsistent states, and parser state merging. Thus,
5516 IELR and LALR suffer the most. Canonical
5517 LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
5518 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
5520 LAC is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm that
5521 completely solves these problems for canonical LR,
5522 IELR, and LALR without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc},
5523 default reductions, or state mering. Conceptually, the mechanism is
5524 straight-forward. Whenever the parser fetches a new token from the
5525 scanner so that it can determine the next parser action, it immediately
5526 suspends normal parsing and performs an exploratory parse using a
5527 temporary copy of the normal parser state stack. During this
5528 exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic actions.
5529 If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing then
5530 resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
5531 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
5532 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
5533 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each
5534 token in the grammar.
5536 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in
5537 a consistent parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not
5538 attempt to fetch a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed
5539 to determine the next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions
5540 are enabled in consistent states (@pxref{Decl
5541 Summary,,lr.default-reductions}) affects how soon the parser detects a
5542 syntax error: when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous token or when it
5543 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead. The latter behavior
5544 is probably more intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to
5545 achieve the former behavior while default reductions are fully enabled.
5547 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether
5548 to enable default reductions in consistent states, canonical
5549 LR and IELR behave exactly the same for both
5550 syntactically acceptable and syntactically unacceptable input. While
5551 LALR still does not support the full language-recognition
5552 power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at
5553 least enables LALR's syntax error handling to correctly
5554 reflect LALR's language-recognition power.
5556 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice,
5557 it can have a performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must
5558 be performed twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions
5559 in consistent states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate
5560 an exploratory parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a
5561 parse are often the file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the
5562 scanner, and the user's semantic actions, but none of these are
5563 performed during the exploratory parse. Finally, the base of the
5564 temporary stack used during an exploratory parse is a pointer into the
5565 normal parser state stack so that the stack is never physically copied.
5566 In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC has proven
5567 insignificant for practical grammars.
5569 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5571 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5575 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5577 @findex %define parse.trace
5580 @item Languages(s): C, C++
5582 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5583 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 in the parser file if it
5584 is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
5585 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5587 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5589 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5593 @c ================================================== variant
5595 @findex %define variant
5602 Request variant-based semantic values.
5603 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5605 @item Accepted Values:
5608 @item Default Value:
5616 @c ---------------------------------------------------------- %define
5618 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5619 Write a header file containing macro definitions for the token type
5620 names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5621 If the parser output file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then this file
5622 is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5624 For C parsers, the output header declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5625 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5626 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}.
5627 Therefore, if you are using a @code{%union}
5628 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}) with components that
5629 require other definitions, or if you have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro
5631 (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to
5632 arrange for these definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by
5633 putting them in a prerequisite header that is included both by your
5634 parser and by any other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5636 Unless your parser is pure, the output header declares @code{yylval}
5637 as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5640 If you have also used locations, the output header declares
5641 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
5642 the @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations, ,Tracking
5645 This output file is normally essential if you wish to put the definition
5646 of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because @code{yylex}
5647 typically needs to be able to refer to the above-mentioned declarations
5648 and to the token type codes. @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of
5651 @findex %code requires
5652 @findex %code provides
5653 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5654 header also contains their code.
5655 @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
5658 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5659 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5662 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5663 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5664 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5667 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5668 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names are
5669 chosen as if the input file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5672 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5673 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5674 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5675 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5677 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5681 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5682 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5683 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5684 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5685 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5686 accurate syntax error messages.
5689 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5690 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5691 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5693 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5694 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5695 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5696 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5697 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5698 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5699 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5700 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5702 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5706 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5707 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5708 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5713 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5714 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5715 file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the parser file so that
5716 the C compiler and debuggers will associate errors and object code with
5717 your source file (the grammar file). This directive causes them to
5718 associate errors with the parser file, treating it an independent source
5719 file in its own right.
5722 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5723 Specify @var{file} for the parser file.
5726 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5727 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}),
5728 for which Bison is more careful to warn about unreasonable usage.
5731 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5732 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5733 Require a Version of Bison}.
5736 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5737 Specify the skeleton to use.
5739 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5740 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5741 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5742 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5744 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5745 file in the Bison installation directory.
5746 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5747 directory of the grammar file.
5748 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5751 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5752 Generate an array of token names in the parser file. The name of the
5753 array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is the name of the
5754 token whose internal Bison token code number is @var{i}. The first
5755 three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the predefined tokens
5757 @code{"error"}, and @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols
5758 defined in the grammar file.
5760 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5761 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5762 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5763 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5764 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5765 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5766 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5769 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5770 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5771 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5775 The highest token number, plus one.
5777 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5779 The number of grammar rules,
5781 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5785 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5786 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5787 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5788 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5792 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5793 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5794 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5798 @node Multiple Parsers
5799 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5801 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5802 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5803 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5804 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5806 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5807 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5808 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5809 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5810 names that do not conflict.
5812 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5813 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5814 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5815 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5816 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5817 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5818 @code{clex}, and so on.
5820 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5821 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5822 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5823 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5824 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5826 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the beginning
5827 of the parser source file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5828 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes one
5829 name for the other in the entire parser file.
5832 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5833 @cindex C-language interface
5836 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5837 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5838 functions that it needs to use.
5840 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5841 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5842 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5843 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5846 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5847 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5848 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5849 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5850 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5851 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5853 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5854 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5855 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5859 @node Parser Function
5860 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5863 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5864 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5865 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5866 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5867 without reading further.
5870 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5871 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5872 is due to end-of-input).
5874 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5875 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5878 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5881 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5886 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5891 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5894 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5895 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5896 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5898 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
5899 @findex %parse-param
5900 Declare that one or more
5901 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
5902 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5903 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5904 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5907 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5910 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
5914 Then call the parser like this:
5918 int nastiness, randomness;
5919 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5920 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5926 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5929 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5932 @node Push Parser Function
5933 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5934 @findex yypush_parse
5936 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5937 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5939 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5940 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5941 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5942 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5944 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5945 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5946 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5947 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5950 @node Pull Parser Function
5951 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5952 @findex yypull_parse
5954 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5955 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5957 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5958 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
5959 declaration is used.
5960 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5962 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5963 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5966 @node Parser Create Function
5967 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5968 @findex yypstate_new
5970 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5971 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5973 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5974 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5975 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5976 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5978 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5979 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5980 or 0 if no memory was available.
5981 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5985 @node Parser Delete Function
5986 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5987 @findex yypstate_delete
5989 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5990 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5992 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5993 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5994 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5995 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5997 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5998 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5999 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6003 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6005 @cindex lexical analyzer
6007 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6008 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6009 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6010 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6012 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the Bison
6013 grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source file, you
6014 need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be available there.
6015 To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run Bison, so that it will
6016 write these macro definitions into a separate header file
6017 @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include in the other source files
6018 that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
6021 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6022 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6023 of the token it has read.
6024 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6025 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6027 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6028 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6031 @node Calling Convention
6032 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6034 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6035 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6036 signifies end-of-input.
6038 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6039 in the parser file becomes a C macro whose definition is the proper
6040 numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can use the name
6041 to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6043 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6044 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6045 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6046 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6047 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6048 signifies end-of-input.
6050 Here is an example showing these things:
6057 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6060 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6061 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6063 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6069 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6070 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6072 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6073 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6077 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6078 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6079 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6080 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6083 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6084 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6085 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6086 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6087 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6090 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6091 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6092 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6093 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6096 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6099 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6100 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6101 strlen (token_buffer))
6102 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6103 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6108 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6109 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6113 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6116 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6117 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6118 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6119 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6125 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6126 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6131 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6132 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6133 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6134 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6135 declaration looks like this:
6148 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6153 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6154 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6159 @node Token Locations
6160 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6163 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
6164 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the textual locations
6165 of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in
6166 @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual
6167 location of a token just parsed in the global variable @code{yylloc}.
6168 So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that variable.
6170 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6171 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6172 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6173 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6174 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6177 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6180 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6182 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6183 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6184 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6185 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6186 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6187 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6192 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6195 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6196 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6201 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6202 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6203 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6206 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6207 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6208 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6209 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6211 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6213 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6214 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6215 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6218 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6220 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6221 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6222 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6223 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6224 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6230 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6231 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6232 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6236 results in the following signature:
6239 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6240 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6243 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6246 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6247 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6251 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6254 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6255 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6256 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6259 @node Error Reporting
6260 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6261 @cindex error reporting function
6264 @cindex syntax error
6266 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6267 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6268 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6269 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6272 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6273 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6274 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6275 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6276 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6278 @findex %define parse.error
6279 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison
6280 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
6281 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
6282 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6284 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6285 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6286 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6287 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6288 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6289 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6291 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6292 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6293 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6295 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6300 yyerror (char const *s)
6304 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6309 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6310 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6311 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6312 immediately return 1.
6314 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6315 an access to the current location.
6316 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6317 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6318 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6322 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6323 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6326 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6329 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6330 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6333 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6334 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6335 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6336 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6340 /* Location tracking. */
6344 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6346 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6347 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6351 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6354 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6355 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6356 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6357 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6362 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6363 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6364 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6365 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6366 message is always passed last.
6368 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6369 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6370 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6374 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6375 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6376 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6377 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6379 @node Action Features
6380 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6381 @cindex summary, action features
6382 @cindex action features summary
6384 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6385 are useful in actions.
6387 @deffn {Variable} $$
6388 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6389 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6392 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6393 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6394 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6397 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6398 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6399 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6400 Types of Values in Actions}.
6403 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6404 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6405 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6406 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6409 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6410 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6411 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6414 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6415 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6416 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6419 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6421 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6422 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6423 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6424 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6425 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6426 going to be reduced by this rule.
6428 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6429 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6430 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6433 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6436 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6438 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6441 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6443 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6447 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6449 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6450 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6451 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6452 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6453 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6456 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6457 @findex YYRECOVERING
6458 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6459 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6460 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6463 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6464 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6465 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6466 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6467 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6469 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6472 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6473 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6475 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6477 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6480 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6481 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6482 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6483 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6486 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6487 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6488 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6489 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6491 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6494 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6495 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6496 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6497 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6499 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6504 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6505 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6506 Tracking Locations}.
6508 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6512 @c int first_line, last_line;
6513 @c int first_column, last_column;
6517 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6518 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6520 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6521 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6522 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6525 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6528 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6530 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6531 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6532 Tracking Locations}.
6535 @node Internationalization
6536 @section Parser Internationalization
6537 @cindex internationalization
6543 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6544 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6545 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6546 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6547 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6548 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6549 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6550 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6553 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6554 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6555 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6560 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6561 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6562 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6563 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6564 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6568 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6573 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6574 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6575 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6576 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6577 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6578 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6579 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6580 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6581 Bison-generated parser.
6584 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6585 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6586 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6590 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6593 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6594 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6595 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6599 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6600 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6601 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6604 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6610 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6614 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6620 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6621 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6622 @cindex algorithm of parser
6625 @cindex parser stack
6626 @cindex stack, parser
6628 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6629 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6630 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6632 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6633 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6636 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6637 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6638 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6639 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6640 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6641 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6642 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6644 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6651 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6652 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6655 expr: expr '*' expr;
6659 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6666 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6667 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6669 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6670 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6671 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6673 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6676 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6677 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6678 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6679 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6680 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6681 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6682 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
6683 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6684 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6688 @section Lookahead Tokens
6689 @cindex lookahead token
6691 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6692 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6693 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6694 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6695 token in order to decide what to do.
6697 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6698 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6699 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6700 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6701 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6702 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6703 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6706 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6707 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6708 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6725 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6726 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6727 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6728 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6729 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6731 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6732 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6733 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6734 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6735 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6736 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6741 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6742 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6743 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6744 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6747 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6749 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6750 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6751 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6753 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6754 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6760 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6766 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6767 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6769 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6770 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6771 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6772 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6775 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6776 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6777 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6778 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6779 contrast it with the other alternative.
6781 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6782 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6786 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6788 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6791 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6792 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6793 making these two inputs equivalent:
6796 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6798 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6801 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6802 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6803 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6804 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6805 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6806 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6807 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6808 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6810 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6811 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6812 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6813 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6815 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6817 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6818 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6819 rules. Here is a complete Bison input file that actually manifests the
6824 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6836 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6845 @section Operator Precedence
6846 @cindex operator precedence
6847 @cindex precedence of operators
6849 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6850 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6851 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6852 shift and when to reduce.
6855 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6856 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
6857 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
6858 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6859 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6862 @node Why Precedence
6863 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6865 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6866 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6880 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6881 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6882 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6883 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6884 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6885 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6886 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6889 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6890 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6891 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6892 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6893 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6894 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6895 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6896 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6899 @cindex associativity
6900 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6901 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6902 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6903 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6904 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6905 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6906 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6907 makes right-associativity.
6909 @node Using Precedence
6910 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6916 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6917 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6918 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6919 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6920 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6921 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6922 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6924 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
6925 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
6926 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
6927 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
6928 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
6929 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
6930 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
6931 what expected the grammar author.
6933 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6934 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
6935 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6936 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6937 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6939 @node Precedence Only
6940 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
6943 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
6944 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
6945 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
6946 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
6947 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
6948 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
6949 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
6951 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
6952 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
6953 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
6957 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
6960 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
6961 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
6962 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
6963 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
6964 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
6965 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
6966 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
6973 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
6974 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
6975 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
6976 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
6977 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
6978 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
6979 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
6981 @node Precedence Examples
6982 @subsection Precedence Examples
6984 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6992 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6993 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6994 declared with @code{'-'}:
6997 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
7003 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
7004 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
7005 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
7007 @node How Precedence
7008 @subsection How Precedence Works
7010 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7011 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7012 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7013 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7014 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7015 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7017 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7018 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7019 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7020 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7021 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7022 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7023 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7026 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7027 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7029 @node Contextual Precedence
7030 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7031 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7032 @cindex unary operator precedence
7033 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7034 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7037 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7038 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7039 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7040 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7042 The Bison precedence declarations
7043 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7044 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7045 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7048 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7049 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7050 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7051 modifier's syntax is:
7054 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7058 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7059 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7060 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7061 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7062 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7064 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7065 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7066 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7076 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7083 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7088 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7089 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7090 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7091 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7093 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7094 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7095 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7096 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7098 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7099 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7100 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7101 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7102 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7103 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7105 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7106 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7110 @section Parser States
7111 @cindex finite-state machine
7112 @cindex parser state
7113 @cindex state (of parser)
7115 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7116 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7117 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7118 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7119 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7121 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7122 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7123 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7124 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7125 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7126 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7127 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7128 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7131 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7132 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7133 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7136 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7137 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7138 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7140 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7141 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7144 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7145 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7148 sequence: /* empty */
7149 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7152 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7155 maybeword: /* empty */
7156 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7158 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7163 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7164 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7165 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7166 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7167 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7168 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7170 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7171 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7172 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7174 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7175 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7176 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7177 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7178 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7180 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7181 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7182 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7183 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7186 sequence: /* empty */
7187 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7189 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7193 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7196 sequence: /* empty */
7198 | sequence redirects
7205 redirects:/* empty */
7206 | redirects redirect
7211 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7212 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7213 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7214 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7215 in infinitely many ways!
7217 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7218 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7219 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7220 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7222 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7226 sequence: /* empty */
7232 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7236 sequence: /* empty */
7238 | sequence redirects
7246 | redirects redirect
7250 @node Mystery Conflicts
7251 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7253 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7261 def: param_spec return_spec ','
7265 | name_list ':' type
7283 | name ',' name_list
7288 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7289 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7290 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7291 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7295 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7297 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7298 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7299 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7301 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7302 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7303 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7304 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7305 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7306 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7307 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7309 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the
7310 non-LR(1) class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in
7311 difficulties beyond just mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts.
7312 The best way to fix all these problems is to select a different parser
7313 table generation algorithm.
7314 Either IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but
7315 the former is more efficient and easier to debug during development.
7316 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}, for details.
7317 (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations
7319 More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7321 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7322 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7323 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7324 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7325 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7336 /* This rule is never used. */
7342 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7343 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7344 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7345 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7346 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7347 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7349 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7350 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7351 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7352 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7353 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7354 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7359 | name_list ':' type
7367 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7368 generators, please see:
7369 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of
7370 LALR(1) Look-Ahead Sets, @cite{ACM Transactions on
7371 Programming Languages and Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982),
7372 pp.@: 615--649 @uref{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/69622.357187}.
7374 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7375 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7377 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7378 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7379 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7381 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7382 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7383 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7384 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7385 context-free languages.
7386 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7387 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7388 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7389 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7390 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7391 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
7392 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7393 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7395 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7396 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7397 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7398 parser uses the same basic
7399 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7400 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7401 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7402 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7404 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7405 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7406 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7407 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7408 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7410 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7411 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7412 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7413 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7414 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7415 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7416 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7417 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7418 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7419 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7420 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7423 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7424 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7425 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7426 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7427 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7428 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7429 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7430 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7431 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7432 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7433 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7434 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7436 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7437 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7438 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7440 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7441 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7442 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7443 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7444 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7445 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7446 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7447 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7448 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7449 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7450 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7451 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7453 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, please see: Elizabeth
7454 Scott, Adrian Johnstone and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain, Tomita-Style
7455 Generalised LR Parsers, Royal Holloway, University of
7456 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12,
7457 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps},
7460 @node Memory Management
7461 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7462 @cindex memory exhaustion
7463 @cindex memory management
7464 @cindex stack overflow
7465 @cindex parser stack overflow
7466 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7468 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7469 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7470 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7472 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7473 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7474 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7477 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7478 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7479 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7480 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7482 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7483 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7484 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7485 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7486 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7487 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7489 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7490 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7491 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7494 @cindex default stack limit
7495 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7499 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7500 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7501 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7502 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7503 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7505 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7507 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
7508 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
7509 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
7510 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
7511 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
7512 non-trivial copy constructors.
7513 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
7516 @node Error Recovery
7517 @chapter Error Recovery
7518 @cindex error recovery
7519 @cindex recovery from errors
7521 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7522 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7523 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7526 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7527 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7528 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7529 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7530 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7531 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7532 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7535 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7536 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7537 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7538 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7539 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7540 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7545 stmnts: /* empty string */
7551 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7552 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7554 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7555 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7556 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7557 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7558 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7559 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7560 applicable in the ordinary way.
7562 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7563 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7564 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7565 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7566 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7567 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7568 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7569 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7570 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7571 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7572 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7573 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7575 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7576 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7577 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7580 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7583 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7584 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7585 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7586 spurious error message:
7589 primary: '(' expr ')'
7595 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7596 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7597 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7598 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7599 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7600 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7601 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7604 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7605 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7606 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7607 error messages resume.
7609 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7610 as any other rules can.
7613 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7614 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7615 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7616 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7619 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7620 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7621 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7623 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7625 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7626 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7627 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7628 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7629 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7631 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7632 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7633 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7634 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7637 @node Context Dependency
7638 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7640 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7641 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7642 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7643 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7647 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7648 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7649 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7650 error recovery rules must be written.
7653 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7654 neither clean nor robust.)
7656 @node Semantic Tokens
7657 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7659 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7660 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7666 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7667 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7668 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7670 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7671 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7672 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7673 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7674 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7676 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7677 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7678 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7679 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7680 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7681 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7682 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7684 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7685 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7686 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7687 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7691 typedef int foo, bar;
7694 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7695 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7700 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7701 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7703 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7704 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7705 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7706 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7707 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7711 declarator maybeasm '='
7713 | declarator maybeasm
7717 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7719 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7724 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7725 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7726 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7728 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7729 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7730 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7731 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7732 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7733 the syntactic context.
7735 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7736 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7737 @cindex lexical tie-in
7739 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7740 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7743 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7744 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7745 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7746 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7747 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7754 void yyerror (char const *);
7768 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7782 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7783 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7784 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7786 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the parser file
7787 is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue, ,The Prologue}).
7788 You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey the flag.
7790 @node Tie-in Recovery
7791 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7793 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7794 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7796 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7797 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7798 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7799 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7803 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7810 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7811 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7812 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7813 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7814 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7816 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7818 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7819 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7820 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7832 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7833 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7834 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7835 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7837 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7838 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7839 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7840 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7841 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7842 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7845 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7848 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7850 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7851 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7852 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7853 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7854 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7855 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7858 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7859 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7863 @section Understanding Your Parser
7865 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7866 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7867 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7868 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7869 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7871 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7872 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7873 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7874 the parser output file name, and adding @samp{.output} instead.
7875 Therefore, if the input file is @file{foo.y}, then the parser file is
7876 called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As a consequence, the verbose
7877 output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7879 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7896 @command{bison} reports:
7899 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7900 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7901 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7902 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7903 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7906 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7907 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7908 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7909 interpretation is the same.
7911 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7912 to precedence and/or associativity:
7915 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7916 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7917 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7922 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7925 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7926 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7927 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7928 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7932 @cindex token, useless
7933 @cindex useless token
7934 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7935 @cindex useless nonterminal
7936 @cindex rule, useless
7937 @cindex useless rule
7938 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7939 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7940 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7941 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7945 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7948 Terminals unused in grammar:
7951 Rules useless in grammar:
7956 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7962 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7963 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7964 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7965 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7966 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7971 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7974 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7984 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7989 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7994 @cindex pointed rule
7995 @cindex rule, pointed
7996 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
7997 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
7998 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
7999 that the input cursor.
8004 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8006 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8011 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8012 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8013 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8014 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8015 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8016 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
8017 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8018 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8020 @cindex core, item set
8021 @cindex item set core
8022 @cindex kernel, item set
8023 @cindex item set core
8024 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8025 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8026 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8027 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8028 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8029 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
8035 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8036 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
8037 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
8038 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
8039 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
8040 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
8042 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8053 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
8055 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8059 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8060 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8061 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8062 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8067 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
8068 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8069 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8070 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8071 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8073 $ shift, and go to state 3
8074 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8075 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8076 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8077 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8081 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8082 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
8083 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
8084 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
8085 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
8086 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
8088 @cindex accepting state
8089 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8095 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
8101 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
8102 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
8104 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8110 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
8112 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8118 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
8120 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8126 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
8128 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8134 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
8136 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8141 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8147 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8148 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
8149 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8150 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8151 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8153 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8154 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8156 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8157 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8160 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8161 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8162 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8163 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8164 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8165 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8166 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8167 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8169 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8170 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8171 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
8174 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8175 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8176 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8177 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8178 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8179 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8180 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8181 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8182 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8183 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8184 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8185 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8190 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8191 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
8192 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8193 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8194 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8196 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8197 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8199 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8200 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8203 The remaining states are similar:
8208 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8209 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8210 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
8211 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8212 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8214 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8215 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8217 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8218 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8222 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8223 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8224 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8225 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
8226 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8228 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8230 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8231 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8235 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8236 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8237 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8238 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8239 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
8241 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8242 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8243 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8244 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8246 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8247 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8248 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8249 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8250 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8254 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8255 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8256 @samp{*}, but also because the
8257 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8261 @section Tracing Your Parser
8264 @cindex tracing the parser
8266 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8267 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8269 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8272 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8274 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8275 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8276 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8277 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8280 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8281 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8282 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8284 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8286 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8287 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
8288 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
8290 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
8291 @findex %define parse.trace
8292 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary,
8293 ,Bison Declaration Summary}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
8294 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
8295 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless
8296 POSIX and Yacc portability matter to you, this is the
8300 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
8303 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8304 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8305 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8306 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8307 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8308 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8310 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8311 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8312 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8313 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8315 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8316 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8317 messages tell you these things:
8321 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8324 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8325 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8328 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8329 of the state stack afterward.
8332 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8333 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8334 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8335 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8336 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8337 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8338 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8339 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8340 grammar are to blame.
8342 The parser file is a C program and you can use C debuggers on it, but it's
8343 not easy to interpret what it is doing. The parser function is a
8344 finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from the actions it executes
8345 the same code over and over. Only the values of variables show where in
8346 the grammar it is working.
8349 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8350 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8351 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8352 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8353 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8354 value (from @code{yylval}).
8356 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8357 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8361 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8362 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8365 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8368 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8371 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8372 else if (type == NUM)
8373 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8377 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8380 @chapter Invoking Bison
8381 @cindex invoking Bison
8382 @cindex Bison invocation
8383 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8385 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8391 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8392 @samp{.y}. The parser file's name is made by replacing the @samp{.y}
8393 with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory. Thus, the
8394 @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields
8395 @file{foo.tab.c}, and the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields
8396 @file{foo.tab.c}. It's also possible, in case you are writing
8397 C++ code instead of C in your grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp}
8398 or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the output files will take an extension like
8399 the given one as input (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and
8400 @file{foo.tab.c++}).
8401 This feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8402 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8407 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8410 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8413 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8416 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8418 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8419 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8420 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8423 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8424 in alphabetical order by short options.
8425 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8426 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8430 @section Bison Options
8432 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8433 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8434 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8435 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8436 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8439 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8440 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8443 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8449 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8453 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8455 @item --print-localedir
8456 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8458 @item --print-datadir
8459 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8463 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause
8464 different diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in
8465 other minor ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output
8466 file name conventions, so that the parser output file is called
8467 @file{y.tab.c}, and the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and
8469 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate @code{#define}
8470 statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate token numbers with token
8472 Thus, the following shell script can substitute for Yacc, and the Bison
8473 distribution contains such a script for compatibility with POSIX:
8480 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8481 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8482 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8483 this option is specified.
8485 @item -W [@var{category}]
8486 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8487 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8490 @item midrule-values
8491 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8493 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8496 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8499 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8500 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8503 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8506 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8507 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8508 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8512 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8517 Turn off all the warnings.
8519 Treat warnings as errors.
8522 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8523 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8524 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8533 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
8534 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
8535 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8537 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8538 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8539 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8540 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8541 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8542 (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}) except that Bison processes multiple
8543 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8547 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8550 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8551 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8552 definition for @var{name}.
8554 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8555 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8556 definitions for @var{name}.
8558 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8559 definitions for @var{name}.
8562 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8563 makefiles unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore any
8564 conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8566 @item -L @var{language}
8567 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8568 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8569 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8570 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8571 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8573 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8577 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8579 @item -p @var{prefix}
8580 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8581 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8582 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8586 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser file.
8587 Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser file so that the C compiler
8588 and debuggers will associate errors with your source file, the
8589 grammar file. This option causes them to associate errors with the
8590 parser file, treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8593 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8594 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8595 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8597 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8598 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8599 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8600 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8602 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8603 file in the Bison installation directory.
8604 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8605 current working directory.
8606 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8609 @itemx --token-table
8610 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8617 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8618 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8619 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8620 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8623 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8624 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8625 with other short options.
8627 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8628 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8629 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8630 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8632 @item -r @var{things}
8633 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8634 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8635 separated list of @var{things} among:
8639 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8643 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8644 each rule's lookahead set.
8647 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8648 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8651 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8652 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8656 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8657 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8658 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8661 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8662 Specify the @var{file} for the parser file.
8664 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8665 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8667 @item -g [@var{file}]
8668 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8669 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8670 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8671 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8672 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8673 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8676 @item -x [@var{file}]
8677 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8678 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8679 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8680 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8682 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8683 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8686 @node Option Cross Key
8687 @section Option Cross Key
8689 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8690 the corresponding short option and directive.
8692 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8693 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8694 @include cross-options.texi
8698 @section Yacc Library
8700 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8701 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8702 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8703 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8704 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8705 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8706 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8708 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8709 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8712 int yyerror (char const *);
8715 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8716 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8717 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8723 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8725 @node Other Languages
8726 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8729 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8730 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8734 @section C++ Parsers
8737 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8738 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8739 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8740 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8741 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8742 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8745 @node C++ Bison Interface
8746 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8747 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8751 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8752 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8753 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8754 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8756 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8758 @findex %define api.namespace
8759 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace
8762 The various classes are generated in the following files:
8767 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8768 used for location tracking when enabled. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8771 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8774 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8775 (Assuming the extension of the input file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8776 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8777 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8778 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8780 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8781 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8782 @samp{%defines} directive.
8785 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8786 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8788 @node C++ Semantic Values
8789 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8790 @c - No objects in unions
8792 @c - Printer and destructor
8794 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
8795 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
8796 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
8797 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
8800 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
8801 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
8805 @subsubsection C++ Unions
8807 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8808 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8809 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8812 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8813 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8814 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8816 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8817 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8818 to such objects are allowed.
8821 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8822 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8823 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8827 @subsubsection C++ Variants
8829 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
8830 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
8831 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
8832 types can be used without pointers.
8834 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
8835 @code{variant} (@pxref{Decl Summary, , variant}). Once this defined,
8836 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
8837 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
8839 For instance, instead of
8847 %token <ival> NUMBER;
8848 %token <sval> STRING;
8855 %token <int> NUMBER;
8856 %token <std::string> STRING;
8859 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
8860 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
8863 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
8864 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
8865 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
8867 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
8868 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
8869 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
8870 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
8871 eventually, destroyed.
8873 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
8874 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
8875 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
8878 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
8879 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
8883 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
8884 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
8885 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
8886 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
8887 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
8888 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
8889 that would be duplicating the information.
8891 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
8892 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
8893 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
8894 (the current implementation of) variants:
8897 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
8898 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
8899 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
8900 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
8901 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
8902 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
8905 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
8906 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
8907 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
8908 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
8909 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
8910 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
8913 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
8916 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
8917 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
8919 @node C++ Location Values
8920 @subsection C++ Location Values
8924 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8926 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8927 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
8928 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
8929 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
8930 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
8932 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8933 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8934 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8935 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8936 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8939 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8940 The line, starting at 1.
8943 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8944 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8947 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8948 The column, starting at 0.
8951 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8952 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8955 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8956 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8957 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8958 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8959 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8962 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8963 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8964 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8965 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8968 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8969 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8970 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8973 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8974 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8975 Advance the @code{end} position.
8978 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8979 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8980 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8981 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8984 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8985 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8989 @node C++ Parser Interface
8990 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8991 @c - define parser_class_name
8993 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8995 @c - Reporting errors
8997 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8998 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8999 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9000 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9001 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9002 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9003 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9004 additional argument for its constructor.
9006 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9007 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9008 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
9011 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9012 A structure that contains (only) the definition of the tokens as the
9013 @code{yytokentype} enumeration. To refer to the token @code{FOO}, the
9014 scanner should use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9015 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9016 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9019 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
9020 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
9021 from user actions to raise parse errors. This is equivalent with first
9022 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
9023 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
9024 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
9025 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
9026 function invoked from the user action.
9029 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9030 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9031 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9034 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9035 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
9036 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
9039 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9040 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9043 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9044 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9045 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9049 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9050 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9051 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9052 or nonzero, full tracing.
9055 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9056 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
9057 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9058 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9059 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
9064 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9065 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9066 @c - prefix for yylex.
9067 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9070 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9071 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9072 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
9073 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
9076 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
9077 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
9081 @subsubsection Split Symbols
9083 Therefore the interface is as follows.
9085 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9086 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9087 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
9088 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9089 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9092 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
9093 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
9095 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
9099 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
9100 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9103 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
9104 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9108 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
9109 initialized. So the code would look like:
9113 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
9114 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9117 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
9118 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9127 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
9128 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9131 yylval.build(yytext);
9132 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9137 @node Complete Symbols
9138 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
9140 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and @code{%define lex_symbol},
9141 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
9142 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
9143 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
9144 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
9146 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9147 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
9148 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
9152 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
9153 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
9154 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
9155 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
9157 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
9159 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9160 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
9161 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
9162 including the @code{api.tokens.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
9163 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
9164 also pass the @var{location}.
9167 For instance, given the following declarations:
9170 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9171 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
9172 %token <int> INTEGER;
9177 Bison generates the following functions:
9180 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
9181 const location_type& l);
9182 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
9183 const location_type& loc);
9184 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
9188 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
9191 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
9192 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
9193 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
9196 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
9197 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
9199 @node A Complete C++ Example
9200 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9202 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9203 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9204 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9205 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9206 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9207 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9208 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
9209 actually easier to interface with.
9212 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9213 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9214 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9215 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9216 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9219 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9220 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9222 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9223 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9224 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9225 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9226 of valid input follows.
9230 seven := one + two * three
9234 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9235 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9237 @c - A place to store error messages
9238 @c - A place for the result
9240 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9241 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9242 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9243 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9244 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9245 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9246 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9248 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9249 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9250 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9253 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9255 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9256 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9259 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9264 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9265 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9266 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9267 factor both as follows.
9269 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9271 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9273 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
9274 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9279 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9282 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9284 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9289 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9291 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9297 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
9298 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
9300 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9302 // Handling the scanner.
9305 bool trace_scanning;
9309 Similarly for the parser itself.
9311 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9313 // Run the parser on file F.
9314 // Return 0 on success.
9315 int parse (const std::string& f);
9316 // The name of the file being parsed.
9317 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
9319 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
9324 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9325 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9326 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9327 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9329 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9332 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9333 void error (const std::string& m);
9335 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9338 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9339 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9340 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9341 messages and set error state.
9343 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9345 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9346 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9348 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9349 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9351 variables["one"] = 1;
9352 variables["two"] = 2;
9355 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9360 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9364 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9365 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9366 int res = parser.parse ();
9372 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9374 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9378 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9380 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9385 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9387 The parser definition file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for
9388 the C++ deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header
9389 file, and specifies the name of the parser class.
9390 Because the C++ skeleton changed several times, it is safer to require
9391 the version you designed the grammar for.
9393 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9395 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9396 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9398 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9402 @findex %define variant
9403 @findex %define lex_symbol
9404 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
9405 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
9406 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
9407 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{lex_symbol}.
9409 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9412 %define parse.assert
9417 @findex %code requires
9418 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
9419 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
9420 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
9421 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
9422 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9423 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
9424 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
9426 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9431 class calcxx_driver;
9436 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9437 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9440 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9442 // The parsing context.
9443 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9447 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
9448 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9449 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9452 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9457 // Initialize the initial location.
9458 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9463 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
9466 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9469 %define parse.error verbose
9474 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9475 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9477 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9481 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9487 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9488 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
9489 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol.
9490 To avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}),
9491 prefix tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{Decl Summary,, api.tokens.prefix}).
9493 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9495 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9509 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
9510 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
9513 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9515 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9516 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
9521 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
9522 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
9523 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
9526 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9527 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9529 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <*>;
9533 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
9534 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
9536 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9540 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9543 assignments assignment @{@}
9544 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
9547 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
9552 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9553 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9554 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9555 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9556 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
9557 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
9558 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
9563 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9566 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9569 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
9570 const std::string& m)
9572 driver.error (l, m);
9576 @node Calc++ Scanner
9577 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9579 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9580 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9582 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9584 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9589 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9590 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9592 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9593 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9594 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9595 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
9599 // The location of the current token.
9600 static yy::location loc;
9605 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9606 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9607 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9608 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
9610 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9612 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9616 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9618 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9620 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9626 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9627 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9628 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
9629 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
9630 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9631 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9632 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9634 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9637 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
9638 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
9642 // Code run each time yylex is called.
9645 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
9646 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
9650 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
9652 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9654 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
9655 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
9656 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
9657 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
9658 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
9659 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
9660 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
9664 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9665 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9666 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
9667 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
9669 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
9670 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
9671 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
9676 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
9677 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9679 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9682 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9684 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9687 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9689 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9695 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9701 @node Calc++ Top Level
9702 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9704 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9706 @comment file: calc++.cc
9709 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9712 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9715 calcxx_driver driver;
9716 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9717 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9718 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9719 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9720 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9721 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9722 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9730 @section Java Parsers
9733 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9734 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9735 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9736 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9737 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9738 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9739 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9740 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9743 @node Java Bison Interface
9744 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9745 @c - %language "Java"
9747 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9748 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9750 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9751 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9753 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9754 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will create
9755 a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}. Using an
9756 input file without a @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename
9757 of the output file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix} directive
9758 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The entire output file
9759 name can be changed by the @code{%output} directive or the
9760 @option{-o}/@option{--output} option. The output file contains a single
9761 class for the parser.
9763 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9765 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9766 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9767 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9768 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9771 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9772 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9774 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9775 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9777 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9778 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9780 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9781 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
9782 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
9784 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9785 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9786 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
9788 if needed. Also, in the future the
9789 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9790 access the token names and codes.
9792 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
9793 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
9794 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
9795 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
9798 @node Java Semantic Values
9799 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9800 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9802 @c - Printer and destructor
9804 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9805 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9806 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9809 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9810 %type <Integer> number
9813 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9814 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9815 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9816 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
9817 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9820 %define stype "ASTNode"
9824 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9825 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9827 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9828 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9829 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9830 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9831 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9832 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9834 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9835 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9836 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9838 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9839 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9840 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9843 @node Java Location Values
9844 @subsection Java Location Values
9849 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser
9850 supports location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9851 An auxiliary user-defined class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point
9852 in a file; Bison itself defines a class representing a @dfn{location},
9853 a range composed of a pair of positions (possibly spanning several
9854 files). The location class is an inner class of the parser; the name
9855 is @code{Location} by default, and may also be renamed using
9856 @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9858 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9859 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9860 with @samp{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9861 be supplied by the user.
9864 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9865 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9866 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9869 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9870 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9873 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9874 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9877 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9878 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9879 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9880 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9884 @node Java Parser Interface
9885 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9886 @c - define parser_class_name
9888 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9890 @c - Reporting errors
9892 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9893 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9894 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9895 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9896 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9898 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9899 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9900 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9901 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9902 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9903 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9904 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
9905 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
9907 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9908 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9909 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9910 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
9912 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9913 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9914 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9915 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9916 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9917 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9919 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9920 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9921 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9922 which initialize them automatically.
9924 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9925 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9926 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
9927 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
9929 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
9930 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
9931 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9934 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9935 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9936 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
9939 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9940 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9941 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
9943 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
9944 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
9945 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncatch exceptions.
9948 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9949 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9950 @code{false} otherwise.
9953 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
9954 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
9955 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
9956 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
9957 verbose error messages.
9960 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
9961 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
9962 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9963 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9964 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
9965 available only if location tracking is active.
9968 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9969 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9970 from a syntax error.
9971 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9974 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9975 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9976 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9980 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9981 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9982 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9983 or nonzero, full tracing.
9986 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
9987 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
9988 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
9992 @node Java Scanner Interface
9993 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9996 @c - Lexer interface
9998 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9999 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10000 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10001 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
10002 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
10005 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10006 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10007 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10008 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10011 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10012 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10013 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10014 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10017 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10019 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10020 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10021 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10022 changed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
10025 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10026 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10027 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10030 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10031 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10034 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10035 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10036 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10037 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10038 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10040 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define position_type
10041 "@var{class-name}".}
10044 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10045 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10047 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
10048 "@var{class-name}".}
10052 @node Java Action Features
10053 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10055 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10056 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10058 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10059 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10062 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10063 This may not be assigned to.
10064 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10067 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10068 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10069 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10073 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10074 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10075 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10076 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10077 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10078 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10081 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10082 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10083 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10084 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10086 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10090 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10091 This may not be assigned to.
10092 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10096 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10097 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10100 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
10101 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10102 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10105 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
10106 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10107 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10110 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
10111 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
10112 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10115 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10116 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10117 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10119 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10122 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10123 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10124 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10125 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10126 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10127 available only if location tracking is active.
10131 @node Java Differences
10132 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10134 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10135 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10136 section summarizes these differences.
10140 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10141 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10142 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10143 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10144 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10145 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10146 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10148 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10149 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10150 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10151 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10152 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10155 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10156 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10157 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10158 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10159 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10160 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10161 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10162 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
10163 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10166 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10168 @item @code{%code imports}
10169 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10170 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10171 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
10173 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10174 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10176 @item @code{%code lexer}
10177 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10178 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10179 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
10183 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10184 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10185 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10187 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10188 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10193 @node Java Declarations Summary
10194 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10196 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10197 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10199 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10200 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10203 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10204 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10205 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10206 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10207 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10210 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10211 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10212 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10213 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10216 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10217 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10218 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10219 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10222 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10223 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10224 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10227 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10228 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10229 a Java @emph{type}.
10230 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10233 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10234 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10235 @xref{Java Differences}.
10238 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10239 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10240 @xref{Java Differences}.
10243 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10244 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
10245 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10248 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10249 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10250 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10253 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10254 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10255 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10256 @xref{Java Differences}.
10259 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10260 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
10261 @xref{Java Differences}.
10264 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10265 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10266 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10269 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
10270 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
10271 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10274 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10275 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10276 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10279 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10280 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10281 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10284 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10285 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10287 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10290 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10291 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
10292 constructor. Default is none.
10293 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10296 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10297 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10298 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10299 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10302 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10303 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10304 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10305 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10306 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10309 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10310 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10311 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10314 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10315 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10316 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10317 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10320 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10321 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10322 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10323 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10326 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10327 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10328 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10331 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10332 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10333 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10336 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10337 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10338 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10341 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10342 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10343 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10344 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10348 @c ================================================= FAQ
10351 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10352 @cindex frequently asked questions
10355 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10359 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10360 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10361 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10362 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10363 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10364 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10365 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10366 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10367 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10368 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10369 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10370 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10373 @node Memory Exhausted
10374 @section Memory Exhausted
10377 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10378 message. What can I do?
10381 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10384 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10385 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10387 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10388 following typical questions:
10391 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10392 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10393 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10400 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10401 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10402 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10405 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10406 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10407 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10408 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10409 @file{first-line.l}:
10414 #include <stdlib.h>
10417 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10420 yyparse (char const *file)
10422 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10425 /* One token only. */
10427 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10442 If the file @file{input} contains
10450 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10453 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10454 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10455 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10460 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10461 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10462 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10463 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10464 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10465 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10466 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10467 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10470 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10471 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10472 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10473 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10475 @node Strings are Destroyed
10476 @section Strings are Destroyed
10479 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10480 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10481 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10484 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10485 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10486 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10491 char *yylval = NULL;
10494 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10500 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10501 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10502 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10503 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10508 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10511 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10512 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10513 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10519 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10520 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10521 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10522 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10523 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10524 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10527 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10528 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10529 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10534 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10535 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10538 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10539 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10542 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10543 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10544 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10545 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10546 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10547 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10548 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10550 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10552 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10553 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10554 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10555 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10556 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10557 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10560 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10561 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10564 @node Multiple start-symbols
10565 @section Multiple start-symbols
10568 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10569 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10570 multiple entry points.
10573 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10574 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10575 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10576 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10580 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10582 start: START_FOO foo
10586 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10587 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10589 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10590 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10591 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10592 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10593 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10594 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10595 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10596 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10599 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10604 int t = start_token;
10609 /* @r{The rules.} */
10613 @node Secure? Conform?
10614 @section Secure? Conform?
10617 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10620 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10621 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10622 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10623 please send us a bug report.
10625 @node I can't build Bison
10626 @section I can't build Bison
10629 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10630 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10634 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10635 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10636 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10637 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10638 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10639 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10640 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10643 @node Where can I find help?
10644 @section Where can I find help?
10647 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10650 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10651 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10652 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10653 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10654 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10655 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10656 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10657 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10661 @section Bug Reports
10664 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10667 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10668 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10669 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10670 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10671 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10673 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10674 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10675 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10676 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10677 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10679 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10680 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10681 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10682 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10683 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10684 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10686 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10687 send a bug report just because you can not provide a fix.
10689 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10691 @node More Languages
10692 @section More Languages
10695 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10696 favorite language here}?
10699 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10700 languages; contributions are welcome.
10703 @section Beta Testing
10706 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10709 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10710 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10711 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10712 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10713 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10714 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10715 essentially halted.
10717 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10718 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10719 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10720 systems are especially welcome.
10722 @node Mailing Lists
10723 @section Mailing Lists
10726 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10729 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10731 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10733 @node Table of Symbols
10734 @appendix Bison Symbols
10735 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10736 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10738 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10739 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10740 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10743 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10744 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
10745 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10748 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10749 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10750 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10753 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10754 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10755 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10758 @deffn {Variable} $$
10759 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10763 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10764 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10765 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10768 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10769 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10773 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10774 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10778 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10779 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10780 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10781 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10784 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10785 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10786 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied directly to
10787 the output file uninterpreted. Such code forms the prologue of the input
10788 file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10792 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
10793 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
10794 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
10795 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
10796 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
10797 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
10798 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
10800 This feature is experimental.
10801 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10805 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10806 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10809 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10810 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10814 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10815 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10818 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10819 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10820 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10823 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10824 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10827 This feature is experimental.
10828 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10831 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10834 @deffn {Directive} <>
10835 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10838 This feature is experimental.
10839 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10842 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10845 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10846 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10847 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10848 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10851 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10852 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10853 Insert @var{code} verbatim into output parser source.
10854 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
10857 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10858 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10862 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10863 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10864 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10869 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{define-variable}
10870 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} @var{value}
10871 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} "@var{value}"
10872 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
10873 @xref{Decl Summary,,%define}.
10876 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10877 Bison declaration to create a header file meant for the scanner.
10878 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10881 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10882 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10883 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10886 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10887 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10888 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10891 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10892 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10893 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10897 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10898 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10899 used in the grammar.
10902 @deffn {Symbol} error
10903 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10904 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10905 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10906 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10907 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10908 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10909 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10910 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10913 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10914 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}.
10917 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10918 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10922 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10923 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10924 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10927 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10928 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10931 @deffn {Directive} %language
10932 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10933 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10936 @deffn {Directive} %left
10937 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
10938 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10941 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
10942 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
10943 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10947 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10948 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10949 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10950 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10951 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10954 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10955 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10959 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10960 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10961 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10966 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10967 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10968 parser file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10971 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10972 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
10973 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10976 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10977 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser file. @xref{Decl
10981 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
10982 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
10983 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
10984 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10987 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
10988 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
10989 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10992 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10993 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10994 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10997 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
10998 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
10999 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11002 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11003 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}),
11004 for which Bison is more careful to warn about unreasonable usage.
11007 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11008 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11009 Require a Version of Bison}.
11012 @deffn {Directive} %right
11013 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
11014 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11017 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11018 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11019 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11022 @deffn {Directive} %start
11023 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11027 @deffn {Directive} %token
11028 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11029 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11032 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11033 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser file.
11034 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11037 @deffn {Directive} %type
11038 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11039 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11042 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11043 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11044 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11048 @deffn {Directive} %union
11049 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11050 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11053 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11054 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11055 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11056 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11057 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11059 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11063 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11064 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11065 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11066 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11068 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11072 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11073 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11074 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11077 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11078 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11079 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11080 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11081 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11084 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11085 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11086 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11089 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11090 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11091 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11094 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11095 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11096 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11097 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11100 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11101 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11102 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11105 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11106 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
11107 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
11108 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
11109 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11111 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11115 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11116 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11117 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11120 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11121 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
11122 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
11123 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
11124 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
11125 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
11126 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11129 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11130 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11131 @xref{Memory Management}.
11134 @deffn {Function} yylex
11135 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11136 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11140 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11141 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11142 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11143 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11144 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11147 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11148 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11149 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11150 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11152 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11154 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11155 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11156 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11159 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11160 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11161 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11164 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11165 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11166 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11167 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11169 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11170 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11171 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11174 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11175 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11179 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11180 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11181 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11182 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11183 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11186 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11187 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11188 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11191 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11192 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11193 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11194 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11195 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11196 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11197 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11200 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11201 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11202 call this function to create a new parser.
11203 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11204 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11205 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11206 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11209 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11210 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11211 parse the rest of the input stream.
11212 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11213 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11214 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11215 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11218 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11219 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11220 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11221 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11222 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11223 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11226 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11227 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11228 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11229 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11230 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11233 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11234 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11235 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11236 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11239 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11240 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11241 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11242 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11243 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11244 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11245 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11247 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11248 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11249 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11250 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11251 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11252 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11253 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11256 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11257 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11258 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11266 @item Accepting State
11267 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11268 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11269 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11271 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11272 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11273 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11274 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11275 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11277 @item Consistent State
11278 A state containing only one possible action.
11279 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
11281 @item Context-free grammars
11282 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11283 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11284 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11285 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11288 @item Default Reduction
11289 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11290 contains no other action for the lookahead token.
11291 In permitted parser states, Bison declares the reduction with the
11292 largest lookahead set to be the default reduction and removes that
11294 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
11296 @item Dynamic allocation
11297 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11298 compile time or on entry to a function.
11301 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11302 character string of length zero.
11304 @item Finite-state stack machine
11305 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11306 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11307 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11308 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11309 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11310 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11312 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11313 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11314 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11315 deterministic parsing
11316 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11317 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11318 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11322 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11323 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11324 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11327 A minimal LR(1) parser table generation algorithm.
11328 That is, given any context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates
11329 parser tables with the full language recognition power of canonical
11330 LR(1) but with nearly the same number of parser states as
11332 This reduction in parser states is often an order of magnitude.
11333 More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s extra parser
11334 states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of
11335 non-LR(1) grammars, the number of conflicts for
11336 IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude less as well.
11337 This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar.
11338 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}.
11340 @item Infix operator
11341 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11342 performs some operation.
11345 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11347 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11348 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11349 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and
11350 the use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11351 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11352 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11353 syntax error message. @xref{Decl Summary,,parse.lac}.
11355 @item Language construct
11356 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11357 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11358 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11360 @item Left associativity
11361 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11362 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11363 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11365 @item Left recursion
11366 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11367 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11370 @item Left-to-right parsing
11371 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11372 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11374 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11375 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11376 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11378 @item Lexical tie-in
11379 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11380 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11382 @item Literal string token
11383 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11385 @item Lookahead token
11386 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11390 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11391 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11392 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
11395 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11396 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11398 @item Nonterminal symbol
11399 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11400 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11401 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11404 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11405 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11408 @item Postfix operator
11409 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11410 performs some operation.
11413 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11414 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11418 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11419 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11420 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11422 @item Reverse polish notation
11423 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11425 @item Right recursion
11426 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11427 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11431 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11432 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11433 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11436 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11437 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11438 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11440 @item Single-character literal
11441 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11442 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11445 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11446 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11447 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11448 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11451 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11452 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11453 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11456 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11457 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11460 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11461 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11462 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11463 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11465 @item Terminal symbol
11466 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11467 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11468 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11471 @node Copying This Manual
11472 @appendix Copying This Manual
11482 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11483 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11484 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11485 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11486 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11487 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11488 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11489 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11490 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11491 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11492 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11493 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11494 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11495 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
11496 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11497 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11498 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11499 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11500 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11501 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11502 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11503 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11504 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11505 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
11506 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11507 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11508 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11509 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11510 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11511 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11512 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
11513 @c LocalWords: yytokentype filename destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
11514 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11515 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
11516 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11517 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11518 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11519 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
11520 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11521 @c LocalWords: makefiles Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
11522 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11523 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11524 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11525 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11526 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
11527 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11528 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11529 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11530 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11531 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11532 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
11533 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
11535 @c Local Variables:
11536 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"