+ /* This test case worked OK by accident before. date[1] != date[0],
+ * because we use -80/+20 year window for 2-digit year parsing.
+ * (date[0] is in year 1926, date[1] is in year 2026.) result[1] set
+ * by the first format call returns "07/13/26 07:48:28 p.m. PST",
+ * which is correct, because DST was not used in year 1926 in zone
+ * America/Los_Angeles. When this is parsed, date[1] becomes a time
+ * in 2026, which is "07/13/26 08:48:28 p.m. PDT". There was a zone
+ * offset calculation bug that observed DST in 1926, which was resolved.
+ * Before the bug was resolved, result[0] == result[1] was true,
+ * but after the bug fix, the expected result is actually
+ * result[0] != result[1]. -Yoshito
+ */
+ /* TODO: We need to review this code and clarify what we really
+ * want to test here.
+ */
+ //if (date[1] != date[2] || result[0] != result[1]) {
+ if (date[1] != date[2]) {