From: Vadim Zeitlin <vadim@wxwidgets.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 02:33:13 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: attempts to fix vsnprintf() detection under HP-UX
X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/wxWidgets.git/commitdiff_plain/ec0d6da38d2cf84d69d5bb2d49effb13ed169c64?hp=677eb52d3f3775b25a9dbdf0526785487be675a1

attempts to fix vsnprintf() detection under HP-UX


git-svn-id: https://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk@18808 c3d73ce0-8a6f-49c7-b76d-6d57e0e08775
---

diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index de58e1d076..33d93c5d22 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -3151,11 +3151,44 @@ AC_LANG_SAVE
 AC_LANG_CPLUSPLUS
 
 dnl check for vsnprintf() -- a safe version of vsprintf())
+dnl
+dnl the trouble here is that on some systems (notable HP-UX) this function is
+dnl present in libc but not in the system headers and so AC_CHECK_FUNCS (which,
+dnl stupidly, provides a dummy function declaration inside its extension)
+dnl succeeds, even with C++ compiler, but the compilation of wxWindows fails
+dnl
+dnl so we first check if the function is in the library
 AC_CHECK_FUNCS(vsnprintf)
 
+if test "$ac_cv_func_vsnprintf" = "yes"; then
+    dnl yes it is -- now check if it is in the headers
+    AC_CACHE_CHECK([for vsnprintf declaration], wx_cv_func_vsnprintf_decl,
+        [
+            AC_TRY_COMPILE(
+                [
+                    #include <stdio.h>
+                    #include <stdarg.h>
+                ],
+                [
+                    char *buf;
+                    va_list ap;
+                    vsnprintf(buf, 10u, "%s", ap);
+                ],
+                wx_cv_func_vsnprintf_decl=yes,
+                wx_cv_func_vsnprintf_decl=no
+            )
+        ]
+    )
+
+    if test "$wx_cv_func_vsnprintf_decl" = "yes"; then
+        AC_DEFINE(HAVE_VSNPRINTF_DECL)
+    fi
+fi
+
 if test "$wxUSE_UNICODE" = yes; then
     dnl also look if we have wide char IO functions
     AC_CHECK_FUNCS(fputwc wprintf vswprintf)
+
     dnl MinGW has a vswprintf with a different prototype, and
     dnl a _vsnwprintf with the correct prototype, but AC_CHECK_FUNCS
     dnl finds it even if it is not declared in some versions...
diff --git a/include/wx/wxchar.h b/include/wx/wxchar.h
index 03a406d0ff..88ea300646 100644
--- a/include/wx/wxchar.h
+++ b/include/wx/wxchar.h
@@ -594,6 +594,15 @@ WXDLLEXPORT bool wxOKlibc(); // for internal use
 // printf() family saga
 // ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
+/*
+   For some systems vsnprintf() exists in the system libraries but not in the
+   headers, so we need to declare it ourselves to be able to use it.
+ */
+#ifndef HAVE_VSNPRINTF_DECL
+    extern "C"
+    int vsnprintf(char *str, size_t size, const char *format, va_list ap);
+#endif // !HAVE_VSNPRINTF_DECL
+
 /*
    First of all, we always want to define safe snprintf() function to be used
    instead of sprintf(). Some compilers already have it (or rather vsnprintf()
diff --git a/setup.h.in b/setup.h.in
index 6662300776..ab759d6ee5 100644
--- a/setup.h.in
+++ b/setup.h.in
@@ -964,6 +964,9 @@
 /* Define if you have vsnprintf() */
 #undef HAVE_VSNPRINTF
 
+/* Define if you have vsnprintf() declaration in the header */
+#undef HAVE_VSNPRINTF_DECL
+
 /* Define if you have usleep() */
 #undef HAVE_USLEEP
 
diff --git a/setup.h_vms b/setup.h_vms
index 43530a6b23..60101dae62 100644
--- a/setup.h_vms
+++ b/setup.h_vms
@@ -993,6 +993,9 @@
 /* Define if you have vsnprintf() */
 #undef HAVE_VSNPRINTF
 
+/* Define if you have vsnprintf() declaration in the header */
+#undef HAVE_VSNPRINTF_DECL
+
 /* Define if you have usleep() */
 #define HAVE_USLEEP 1