From: Vadim Zeitlin <vadim@wxwidgets.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:41:20 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Correct the misleading example of using id ranges in XRC documentation.
X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/wxWidgets.git/commitdiff_plain/e2623304afca82cf06c681ff33ae2cd67e138ba3

Correct the misleading example of using id ranges in XRC documentation.

"range[end]" is the last id in the range, inclusive, not the first id after it
so any loops iterating over all ids in the range should cover it as well.

git-svn-id: https://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk@69664 c3d73ce0-8a6f-49c7-b76d-6d57e0e08775
---

diff --git a/docs/doxygen/overviews/xrc_format.h b/docs/doxygen/overviews/xrc_format.h
index bd7f0e659b..677bb9e83f 100644
--- a/docs/doxygen/overviews/xrc_format.h
+++ b/docs/doxygen/overviews/xrc_format.h
@@ -2147,7 +2147,7 @@ Whether a range has positive or negative IDs, [start] is always a smaller
 number than [end]; so code like this works as expected:
 
 @code
-for (int n=XRCID("foo[start]"); n < XRCID("foo[end]"); ++n)
+for (int n=XRCID("foo[start]"); n <= XRCID("foo[end]"); ++n)
     ...
 @endcode