From: Vadim Zeitlin Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:31:14 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Extract event handlers chain documentation in a separate section. X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/wxWidgets.git/commitdiff_plain/12c9c01c2420f56b146cf998e6e58b9f695e2ae3?hp=0ee316821c467b45d759bd0b728842d5521ba632 Extract event handlers chain documentation in a separate section. The explanation of event handlers chaining was too big and distracted from the main point of the event processing section which was to explain in which order different handlers are looked up. git-svn-id: https://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk@61746 c3d73ce0-8a6f-49c7-b76d-6d57e0e08775 --- diff --git a/docs/doxygen/overviews/eventhandling.h b/docs/doxygen/overviews/eventhandling.h index 73c59ed336..be1365eed3 100644 --- a/docs/doxygen/overviews/eventhandling.h +++ b/docs/doxygen/overviews/eventhandling.h @@ -470,21 +470,9 @@ doesn't count as having handled the event and the search continues):
  • The event is passed to the next event handler, if any, in the event handler - chain, i.e., the steps (1) to (4) are done for it. This chain can be formed - using wxEvtHandler::SetNextHandler(): - @image html overview_events_chain.png - (referring to the image, if @c A->ProcessEvent is called and it doesn't handle - the event, @c B->ProcessEvent will be called and so on...). - In the case of wxWindow you can build a stack (implemented using wxEvtHandler - double-linked list) using wxWindow::PushEventHandler(): - @image html overview_events_winstack.png - (referring to the image, if @c W->ProcessEvent is called, it immediately calls - @c A->ProcessEvent; if nor @c A nor @c B handle the event, then the wxWindow - itself is used - i.e. the dynamically bind event handlers and static - event table entries of wxWindow are looked as the last possibility, after - all pushed event handlers were tested). - Note however that usually there are no wxEvtHandler chains nor wxWindows stacks - so this step will usually do anything. + chain, i.e., the steps (1) to (4) are done for it. Usually there is no next + event handler so the control passes to the next step but see @ref + overview_events_nexthandler for how the next handler may be defined.
  • @@ -563,6 +551,27 @@ will have to be written that will override ProcessEvent() in order to pass all events (or any selection of them) to the parent window. +@subsection overview_events_nexthandler Event Handlers Chain + +The step 4 of the event propagation algorithm checks for the next handler in +the event handler chain. This chain can be formed using +wxEvtHandler::SetNextHandler(): + @image html overview_events_chain.png +(referring to the image, if @c A->ProcessEvent is called and it doesn't handle + the event, @c B->ProcessEvent will be called and so on...). + +Additionally, in the case of wxWindow you can build a stack (implemented using +wxEvtHandler double-linked list) using wxWindow::PushEventHandler(): + @image html overview_events_winstack.png +(referring to the image, if @c W->ProcessEvent is called, it immediately calls + @c A->ProcessEvent; if nor @c A nor @c B handle the event, then the wxWindow +itself is used -- i.e. the dynamically bind event handlers and static event +table entries of wxWindow are looked as the last possibility, after all pushed +event handlers were tested). + +By default the chain is empty, i.e. there is no next handler. + + @section overview_events_custom Custom Event Summary @subsection overview_events_custom_general General approach