X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/wxWidgets.git/blobdiff_plain/fc2171bd4c660b8554dae2a1cbf34ff09f3032a6..9f057af5efcd64383486a6d56b8a4703a0118abd:/docs/latex/wx/tthreads.tex?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/docs/latex/wx/tthreads.tex b/docs/latex/wx/tthreads.tex index b6162f24ee..794dd72778 100644 --- a/docs/latex/wx/tthreads.tex +++ b/docs/latex/wx/tthreads.tex @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ well. These classes will hopefully make writing MT programs easier and they also provide some extra error checking (compared to the native (be it Win32 or Posix) -thread API), however it is still an non-trivial undertaking especially for large +thread API), however it is still a non-trivial undertaking especially for large projects. Before starting an MT application (or starting to add MT features to an existing one) it is worth asking oneself if there is no easier and safer way to implement the same functionality. Of course, in some situations threads @@ -24,8 +24,9 @@ new thread for each new client), but in others it might be a very poor choice (example: launching a separate thread when doing a long computation to show a progress dialog). Other implementation choices are available: for the progress dialog example it is far better to do the calculations in the -\helpref{idle handler}{wxidleevent} or call \helpref{wxYield()}{wxyield} -periodically to update the screen. +\helpref{idle handler}{wxidleevent} or even simply do everything at once +but call \helpref{wxWindow::Update()}{wxwindowupdate} periodically to update +the screen. If you do decide to use threads in your application, it is strongly recommended that no more than one thread calls GUI functions. The thread sample shows that @@ -37,10 +38,16 @@ more robust and will undoubtedly save you countless problems (example: under Win32 a thread can only access GDI objects such as pens, brushes, \&c created by itself and not by the other threads). -For communication between threads, use +For communication between secondary threads and the main thread, you may use \helpref{wxEvtHandler::AddPendingEvent}{wxevthandleraddpendingevent} or its short version \helpref{wxPostEvent}{wxpostevent}. These functions -have thread safe implementation so that they can be used as they are for -sending event from one thread to another. +have a thread-safe implementation so that they can be used as they are for +sending events from one thread to another. However there is no built in method +to send messages to the worker threads and you will need to use the available +synchronization classes to implement the solution which suits your needs +yourself. In particular, please note that it is \emph{not} enough to derive +your class from \helpref{wxThread}{wxthread} and +\helpref{wxEvtHandler}{wxevthandler} to send messages to it: in fact, this does +\emph{not} work at all.