X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/wxWidgets.git/blobdiff_plain/9c7df356f9cdbf99bf09f276d67f0fd65c4ca8ea..b5b49e42939fd7ef098241733648b534f71b526c:/include/wx/defs.h?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/include/wx/defs.h b/include/wx/defs.h index be319e0322..80b4fbb845 100644 --- a/include/wx/defs.h +++ b/include/wx/defs.h @@ -127,15 +127,6 @@ // check for native bool type and TRUE/FALSE constants // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -// define boolean constants if not done yet -#ifndef TRUE - #define TRUE 1 -#endif - -#ifndef FALSE - #define FALSE 0 -#endif - // Add more tests here for Windows compilers that already define bool // (under Unix, configure tests for this) #ifndef HAVE_BOOL @@ -180,9 +171,27 @@ // NB: of course, this doesn't replace the standard type, because, for // example, overloading based on bool/int parameter doesn't work and // so should be avoided in portable programs -typedef unsigned int bool; + typedef unsigned int bool; #endif // bool +#ifdef __cplusplus + // define boolean constants: don't use true/false here as not all compilers + // support them + #undef TRUE + #undef FALSE + #define TRUE ((bool)1) + #define FALSE ((bool)0) +#else // !__cplusplus + // the definitions above don't work for C sources + #ifndef TRUE + #define TRUE 1 + #endif + + #ifndef FALSE + #define FALSE 0 + #endif +#endif // C++/!C++ + typedef short int WXTYPE; // special care should be taken with this type under Windows where the real @@ -196,17 +205,16 @@ typedef int wxWindowID; // other feature tests // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - // Every ride down a slippery slope begins with a single step.. - // - // Yes, using nested classes is indeed against our coding standards in - // general, but there are places where you can use them to advantage - // without totally breaking ports that cannot use them. If you do, then - // wrap it in this guard, but such cases should still be relatively rare. - +// Every ride down a slippery slope begins with a single step.. +// +// Yes, using nested classes is indeed against our coding standards in +// general, but there are places where you can use them to advantage +// without totally breaking ports that cannot use them. If you do, then +// wrap it in this guard, but such cases should still be relatively rare. #ifndef __WIN16__ -#define wxUSE_NESTED_CLASSES 1 + #define wxUSE_NESTED_CLASSES 1 #else -#define wxUSE_NESTED_CLASSES 0 + #define wxUSE_NESTED_CLASSES 0 #endif // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- @@ -1159,6 +1167,12 @@ enum wxBorder // be modal. No progress will then be made at all. #define wxPD_REMAINING_TIME 0x0040 +/* + * wxDirDialog styles + */ + +#define wxDD_NEW_DIR_BUTTON 0x0080 + /* * extended dialog specifiers. these values are stored in a different * flag and thus do not overlap with other style flags. note that these