X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/wxWidgets.git/blobdiff_plain/2804f77d88eb478f85a281b19d87e38cd96e0d0c..4f7222ca3632e40ad8f77947dba6bced63733655:/include/wx/unix/apptrait.h?ds=inline

diff --git a/include/wx/unix/apptrait.h b/include/wx/unix/apptrait.h
index fe5639731a..d0c5b47bcf 100644
--- a/include/wx/unix/apptrait.h
+++ b/include/wx/unix/apptrait.h
@@ -22,10 +22,6 @@ public:
 #if wxUSE_CONSOLE_EVENTLOOP
     virtual wxEventLoopBase *CreateEventLoop();
 #endif // wxUSE_CONSOLE_EVENTLOOP
-    virtual bool CreateEndProcessPipe(wxExecuteData& execData);
-    virtual bool IsWriteFDOfEndProcessPipe(wxExecuteData& execData, int fd);
-    virtual void DetachWriteFDOfEndProcessPipe(wxExecuteData& execData);
-    virtual int WaitForChild(wxExecuteData& execData);
 #if wxUSE_TIMER
     virtual wxTimerImpl *CreateTimerImpl(wxTimer *timer);
 #endif
@@ -33,14 +29,31 @@ public:
 
 #if wxUSE_GUI
 
-class WXDLLEXPORT wxGUIAppTraits : public wxGUIAppTraitsBase
+// GTK+ and Motif integrate sockets and child processes monitoring directly in
+// their main loop, the other Unix ports do it at wxEventLoop level and so use
+// the non-GUI traits and don't need anything here
+//
+// TODO: Should we use XtAddInput() for wxX11 too? Or, vice versa, if there is
+//       no advantage in doing this compared to the generic way currently used
+//       by wxX11, should we continue to use GTK/Motif-specific stuff?
+#if defined(__WXGTK__) || defined(__WXMOTIF__)
+    #define wxHAS_GUI_FDIOMANAGER
+    #define wxHAS_GUI_PROCESS_CALLBACKS
+#endif // ports using wxFDIOManager
+
+#if defined(__WXMAC__)
+    #define wxHAS_GUI_PROCESS_CALLBACKS
+    #define wxHAS_GUI_SOCKET_MANAGER
+#endif
+
+class WXDLLIMPEXP_CORE wxGUIAppTraits : public wxGUIAppTraitsBase
 {
 public:
     virtual wxEventLoopBase *CreateEventLoop();
-    virtual bool CreateEndProcessPipe(wxExecuteData& execData);
-    virtual bool IsWriteFDOfEndProcessPipe(wxExecuteData& execData, int fd);
-    virtual void DetachWriteFDOfEndProcessPipe(wxExecuteData& execData);
     virtual int WaitForChild(wxExecuteData& execData);
+#ifdef wxHAS_GUI_PROCESS_CALLBACKS
+    virtual int AddProcessCallback(wxEndProcessData *data, int fd);
+#endif
 #if wxUSE_TIMER
     virtual wxTimerImpl *CreateTimerImpl(wxTimer *timer);
 #endif
@@ -50,9 +63,9 @@ public:
 #endif
 
 #if (defined(__WXMAC__) || defined(__WXCOCOA__)) && wxUSE_STDPATHS
-    virtual wxStandardPathsBase& GetStandardPaths();
+    virtual wxStandardPaths& GetStandardPaths();
 #endif
-    virtual wxPortId GetToolkitVersion(int *majVer, int *minVer) const;
+    virtual wxPortId GetToolkitVersion(int *majVer = NULL, int *minVer = NULL) const;
 
 #if defined(__WXGTK__) && wxUSE_INTL
     virtual void SetLocale();
@@ -64,20 +77,21 @@ public:
                                                wxArrayString& desc) const;
 #endif // __WXGTK20____
 
-#if defined(__WXDEBUG__) && defined(__WXGTK20__)
+#if defined(__WXGTK20__)
     virtual bool ShowAssertDialog(const wxString& msg);
 #endif
 
-    // GTK+ and Motif integrate sockets directly in their main loop, the other
-    // Unix ports do it at wxEventLoop level
-    //
-    // TODO: Should we use XtAddInput() for wxX11 too? Or, vice versa, if there
-    //       is no advantage in doing this compared to the generic way
-    //       currently used by wxX11, should we continue to use GTK/Motif-
-    //       specific stuff?
-#if wxUSE_SOCKETS && (defined(__WXGTK__) || defined(__WXMOTIF__))
-    virtual GSocketManager *GetSocketManager();
+#if wxUSE_SOCKETS
+
+#ifdef wxHAS_GUI_SOCKET_MANAGER
+    virtual wxSocketManager *GetSocketManager();
+#endif
+
+#ifdef wxHAS_GUI_FDIOMANAGER
+    virtual wxFDIOManager *GetFDIOManager();
 #endif
+
+#endif // wxUSE_SOCKETS
 };
 
 #endif // wxUSE_GUI