wxString is a class which represents a character string of arbitrary length (limited by
{\it MAX\_INT} which is usually 2147483647 on 32 bit machines) and containing
-arbitrary characters. The ASCII NUL character is allowed, although care should be
-taken when passing strings containing it to other functions.
+arbitrary characters. The ASCII NUL character is allowed, but be aware that
+in the current string implementation some methods might not work correctly
+in this case.
wxString works with both ASCII (traditional, 7 or 8 bit, characters) as well as
Unicode (wide characters) strings.
which may be enabled to fine tune the memory allocation strategy for your
particular application - and the gain might be quite big.
\item {\bf Compatibility} This class tries to combine almost full compatibility
-with the old wxWindows 1.xx wxString class, some reminiscence to MFC CString
+with the old wxWidgets 1.xx wxString class, some reminiscence to MFC CString
class and 90\% of the functionality of std::string class.
\item {\bf Rich set of functions} Some of the functions present in wxString are
very useful but don't exist in most of other string classes: for example,
to and from ANSI and Unicode strings in any build mode (see the
\helpref{Unicode overview}{unicode} for more details) and maps to either
{\tt string} or {\tt wstring} transparently depending on the current mode.
-\item {\bf Used by wxWindows} And, of course, this class is used everywhere
-inside wxWindows so there is no performance loss which would result from
+\item {\bf Used by wxWidgets} And, of course, this class is used everywhere
+inside wxWidgets so there is no performance loss which would result from
conversions of objects of any other string class (including std::string) to
-wxString internally by wxWindows.
+wxString internally by wxWidgets.
\end{enumerate}
However, there are several problems as well. The most important one is probably
length(), \helpref{Len()}{wxstringlen} or
\helpref{Length()}{wxstringlength} may be used. The first function, as almost
all the other functions in lowercase, is std::string compatible. The second one
-is "native" wxString version and the last one is wxWindows 1.xx way. So the
+is "native" wxString version and the last one is wxWidgets 1.xx way. So the
question is: which one is better to use? And the answer is that:
{\bf The usage of std::string compatible functions is strongly advised!} It will
both make your code more familiar to other C++ programmers (who are supposed to
have knowledge of std::string but not of wxString), let you reuse the same code
-in both wxWindows and other programs (by just typedefing wxString as std::string
-when used outside wxWindows) and by staying compatible with future versions of
-wxWindows which will probably start using std::string sooner or later too.
+in both wxWidgets and other programs (by just typedefing wxString as std::string
+when used outside wxWidgets) and by staying compatible with future versions of
+wxWidgets which will probably start using std::string sooner or later too.
In the situations where there is no corresponding std::string function, please
-try to use the new wxString methods and not the old wxWindows 1.xx variants
+try to use the new wxString methods and not the old wxWidgets 1.xx variants
which are deprecated and may disappear in future versions.
\subsection{Some advice about using wxString}\label{wxstringadvices}