int AppendItems(const wxArrayStringsAdapter& items, void **clientData)
{
wxASSERT_MSG( GetClientDataType() != wxClientData_Object,
- _T("can't mix different types of client data") );
+ wxT("can't mix different types of client data") );
return AppendItems(items, clientData, wxClientData_Void);
}
wxClientData **clientData)
{
wxASSERT_MSG( GetClientDataType() != wxClientData_Void,
- _T("can't mix different types of client data") );
+ wxT("can't mix different types of client data") );
return AppendItems(items, reinterpret_cast<void **>(clientData),
wxClientData_Object);
void **clientData,
wxClientDataType type)
{
- wxASSERT_MSG( !IsSorted(), _T("can't insert items in sorted control") );
+ wxASSERT_MSG( !IsSorted(), wxT("can't insert items in sorted control") );
wxCHECK_MSG( pos <= GetCount(), wxNOT_FOUND,
- _T("position out of range") );
+ wxT("position out of range") );
// not all derived classes handle empty arrays correctly in
// DoInsertItems() and besides it really doesn't make much sense to do
// this (for append it could correspond to creating an initially empty
// control but why would anybody need to insert 0 items?)
wxCHECK_MSG( !items.IsEmpty(), wxNOT_FOUND,
- _T("need something to insert") );
+ wxT("need something to insert") );
return DoInsertItems(items, pos, clientData, type);
}
void **clientData)
{
wxASSERT_MSG( GetClientDataType() != wxClientData_Object,
- _T("can't mix different types of client data") );
+ wxT("can't mix different types of client data") );
return InsertItems(items, pos, clientData, wxClientData_Void);
}
wxClientData **clientData)
{
wxASSERT_MSG( GetClientDataType() != wxClientData_Void,
- _T("can't mix different types of client data") );
+ wxT("can't mix different types of client data") );
return InsertItems(items, pos,
reinterpret_cast<void **>(clientData),
void SetClientData(unsigned int n, void* clientData);
void* GetClientData(unsigned int n) const;
+ // SetClientObject() takes ownership of the pointer, GetClientObject()
+ // returns it but keeps the ownership while DetachClientObject() expects
+ // the caller to delete the pointer and also resets the internally stored
+ // one to NULL for this item
void SetClientObject(unsigned int n, wxClientData* clientData);
wxClientData* GetClientObject(unsigned int n) const;
+ wxClientData* DetachClientObject(unsigned int n);
// return the type of client data stored in this control: usually it just
// returns m_clientDataItemsType but must be overridden in the controls
wxClientDataType m_clientDataItemsType;
};
-// this macro must (unfortunately) be used in any class deriving from both
-// wxItemContainer and wxControl because otherwise there is ambiguity when
-// calling GetClientXXX() functions -- the compiler can't choose between the
-// two versions
-#define wxCONTROL_ITEMCONTAINER_CLIENTDATAOBJECT_RECAST \
- void SetClientData(void *data) \
- { wxEvtHandler::SetClientData(data); } \
- void *GetClientData() const \
- { return wxEvtHandler::GetClientData(); } \
- void SetClientObject(wxClientData *data) \
- { wxEvtHandler::SetClientObject(data); } \
- wxClientData *GetClientObject() const \
- { return wxEvtHandler::GetClientObject(); } \
- void SetClientData(unsigned int n, void* clientData) \
- { wxItemContainer::SetClientData(n, clientData); } \
- void* GetClientData(unsigned int n) const \
- { return wxItemContainer::GetClientData(n); } \
- void SetClientObject(unsigned int n, wxClientData* clientData) \
- { wxItemContainer::SetClientObject(n, clientData); } \
- wxClientData* GetClientObject(unsigned int n) const \
+// Inheriting directly from a wxWindow-derived class and wxItemContainer
+// unfortunately introduces an ambiguity for all GetClientXXX() methods as they
+// are inherited twice: the "global" versions from wxWindow and the per-item
+// versions taking the index from wxItemContainer.
+//
+// So we need to explicitly resolve them and this helper template class is
+// provided to do it. To use it, simply inherit from wxWindowWithItems<Window,
+// Container> instead of Window and Container interface directly.
+template <class W, class C>
+class wxWindowWithItems : public W, public C
+{
+public:
+ typedef W BaseWindowClass;
+ typedef C BaseContainerInterface;
+
+ wxWindowWithItems() { }
+
+ void SetClientData(void *data)
+ { BaseWindowClass::SetClientData(data); }
+ void *GetClientData() const
+ { return BaseWindowClass::GetClientData(); }
+ void SetClientObject(wxClientData *data)
+ { BaseWindowClass::SetClientObject(data); }
+ wxClientData *GetClientObject() const
+ { return BaseWindowClass::GetClientObject(); }
+
+ void SetClientData(unsigned int n, void* clientData)
+ { wxItemContainer::SetClientData(n, clientData); }
+ void* GetClientData(unsigned int n) const
+ { return wxItemContainer::GetClientData(n); }
+ void SetClientObject(unsigned int n, wxClientData* clientData)
+ { wxItemContainer::SetClientObject(n, clientData); }
+ wxClientData* GetClientObject(unsigned int n) const
{ return wxItemContainer::GetClientObject(n); }
+};
-class WXDLLIMPEXP_CORE wxControlWithItemsBase : public wxControl,
- public wxItemContainer
+class WXDLLIMPEXP_CORE wxControlWithItemsBase :
+ public wxWindowWithItems<wxControl, wxItemContainer>
{
public:
wxControlWithItemsBase() { }
- // we have to redefine these functions here to avoid ambiguities in classes
- // deriving from us which would arise otherwise because both base classses
- // have the methods with the same names - hopefully, a smart compiler can
- // optimize away these simple inline wrappers so we don't suffer much from
- // this
- wxCONTROL_ITEMCONTAINER_CLIENTDATAOBJECT_RECAST
-
// usually the controls like list/combo boxes have their own background
// colour
virtual bool ShouldInheritColours() const { return false; }
projects / wxWidgets.git / blobdiff