GetPath() now has wxPATH_GET_COLUME by default

[wxWidgets.git] / docs / latex / wx / tdelwin.tex

diff --git a/docs/latex/wx/tdelwin.tex b/docs/latex/wx/tdelwin.tex
index f9df4e54f02a10f62569d8b4617d144c3472def8..b5864727a87fea2c4a035393b2422cdd3ca2c6f5 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/latex/wx/tdelwin.tex
+++ b/docs/latex/wx/tdelwin.tex
@@ -10,14 +10,14 @@ to close windows.
 
 When the user clicks on the system close button or system close command,
 in a frame or a dialog, wxWindows calls \helpref{wxWindow::Close}{wxwindowclose}. This
-in turn generates an EVT\_CLOSE event: see \helpref{wxWindow::OnCloseWindow}{wxwindowonclosewindow}.
+in turn generates an EVT\_CLOSE event: see \helpref{wxCloseEvent}{wxcloseevent}.
 
 It is the duty of the application to define a suitable event handler, and
 decide whether or not to destroy the window.
 If the application is for some reason forcing the application to close
-(\helpref{wxCloseEvent::CanVeto}{wxcloseeventcanveto} returns FALSE), the window should always be destroyed, otherwise there is the option to
+(\helpref{wxCloseEvent::CanVeto}{wxcloseeventcanveto} returns false), the window should always be destroyed, otherwise there is the option to
 ignore the request, or maybe wait until the user has answered a question
-before deciding whether it's safe to close. The handler for EVT\_CLOSE should
+before deciding whether it is safe to close. The handler for EVT\_CLOSE should
 signal to the calling code if it does not destroy the window, by calling 
 \helpref{wxCloseEvent::Veto}{wxcloseeventveto}. Calling this provides useful information
 to the calling code.
@@ -35,13 +35,13 @@ certain that the window is destroyed.
 
 Your application can either use \helpref{wxWindow::Close}{wxwindowclose} event just as
 the framework does, or it can call \helpref{wxWindow::Destroy}{wxwindowdestroy} directly.
-If using Close(), you can pass a TRUE argument to this function to tell the event handler
+If using Close(), you can pass a true argument to this function to tell the event handler
 that we definitely want to delete the frame and it cannot be vetoed.
 
 The advantage of using Close instead of Destroy is that it will call any clean-up code
 defined by the EVT\_CLOSE handler; for example it may close a document contained in
 a window after first asking the user whether the work should be saved. Close can be vetoed
-by this process (return FALSE), whereas Destroy definitely destroys the window.
+by this process (return false), whereas Destroy definitely destroys the window.
 
 \wxheading{What is the default behaviour?}
 
@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@ In other words, by default, the dialog {\it is not destroyed} (it might have bee
 on the stack, so the assumption of dynamic creation cannot be made).
 
 The default close event handler for wxFrame destroys the frame using Destroy().
-
-Under Windows, wxDialog defines a handler for \helpref{wxWindow::OnCharHook}{wxwindowoncharhook} that
-generates a Cancel event if the Escape key has been pressed.
+%
+%Under Windows, wxDialog defines a handler for \helpref{wxWindow::OnCharHook}{wxwindowoncharhook} that
+%generates a Cancel event if the Escape key has been pressed.
 
 \wxheading{What should I do when the user calls up Exit from a menu?}
 
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ the exit command altogether.
 
 \wxheading{What should I do to upgrade my 1.xx OnClose to 2.0?}
 
-In wxWindows 1.xx, the {\bf OnClose} function did not actually delete 'this', but signalled
+In wxWindows 1.xx, the {\bf OnClose} function did not actually delete 'this', but signaled
 to the calling function (either {\bf Close}, or the wxWindows framework) to delete
 or not delete the window.