From: antirez <antirez@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:28:57 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: FLUSHALL now prevents rdbSave() from resetting the dirty counter, so that the command... 
X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/redis.git/commitdiff_plain/13cd1515f9030ed4f8ebd0b54fa90243858e244b?hp=42a6fcd6c59f7a51d0bda011e55e50960a28cfb5

FLUSHALL now prevents rdbSave() from resetting the dirty counter, so that the command will get replicated and put inside the AOF. This fixes issue #142
---

diff --git a/src/db.c b/src/db.c
index 40b8148c..cc9810b6 100644
--- a/src/db.c
+++ b/src/db.c
@@ -213,7 +213,13 @@ void flushallCommand(redisClient *c) {
         kill(server.bgsavechildpid,SIGKILL);
         rdbRemoveTempFile(server.bgsavechildpid);
     }
-    if (server.saveparamslen > 0) rdbSave(server.dbfilename);
+    if (server.saveparamslen > 0) {
+        /* Normally rdbSave() will reset dirty, but we don't want this here
+         * as otherwise FLUSHALL will not be replicated nor put into the AOF. */
+        int saved_dirty = server.dirty;
+        rdbSave(server.dbfilename);
+        server.dirty = saved_dirty;
+    }
     server.dirty++;
 }