Document the redis-server cli options in the README

[redis.git] / TODO

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 00885d170d07ceb30523ab100f28594bdb94ee33..145ec5243e93a72686067cb180441b583d06f27f 100644 (file)
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -1,9 +1,45 @@
-- Protocol changes as discussed in the Redis group
-- keys expire
-- sunion ssub
-- write integers in a special way on disk (and on memory?)
-- compact types for disk storing of short strings (no 4 bytes overhead!)
-- network layer stresser in test in demo
-- maxclients directive
-- check 'server.dirty' everywere
-- replication automated tests
+Redis TODO
+----------
+
+WARNING: are you a possible Redis contributor?
+         Before implementing what is listed in this file
+         please drop a message in the Redis google group or chat with
+         antirez or pietern on irc.freenode.org #redis to check if the work
+         is already in progress and if the feature is still interesting for
+         us, and *how* exactly this can be implemented to have good changes
+         of a merge. Otherwise it is probably wasted work! Thank you
+
+
+CLUSTER
+=======
+
+* Implement rehashing and cluster check in redis-trib.
+* Reimplement MIGRATE / RESTORE to use just in memory buffers (no disk at
+  all). This will require touching a lot of the RDB stuff around, but we may
+  hand with faster persistence for RDB.
+* Implement the slave nodes semantics and election.
+* Allow redis-trib to create a cluster-wide snapshot (using SYNC).
+* Allow redis-trib to restore a cluster-wide snapshot (implement UPLOAD?).
+
+SCRIPTING
+=========
+
+* SCRIPT FLUSH or alike to start a fresh interpreter?
+
+OPTIMIZATIONS
+=============
+
+* SORT: Don't copy the list into a vector when BY argument is constant.
+* Write the hash table size of every db in the dump, so that Redis can resize the hash table just one time when loading a big DB.
+* Read-only mode for slaves.
+* Redis big lists as linked lists of small ziplists?
+  Possibly a simple heuristic that join near nodes when some node gets smaller than the low_level, and split it into two if gets bigger than high_level.
+
+KNOWN BUGS
+==========
+
+* #519: Slave may have expired keys that were never read in the master (so a DEL
+  is not sent in the replication channel) but are already expired since
+  a lot of time. Maybe after a given delay that is undoubtably greater than
+  the replication link latency we should expire this key on the slave on
+  access?