4c22fd34 |
1 | Redis TODO |
2 | ---------- |
f284d963 |
3 | |
4c22fd34 |
4 | WARNING: are you a possible Redis contributor? |
5833cf16 |
5 | Before implementing what is listed in this file |
4c22fd34 |
6 | please drop a message in the Redis google group or chat with |
7 | antirez or pietern on irc.freenode.org #redis to check if the work |
8 | is already in progress and if the feature is still interesting for |
9 | us, and *how* exactly this can be implemented to have good changes |
10 | of a merge. Otherwise it is probably wasted work! Thank you |
f6b141c5 |
11 | |
bb8716b6 |
12 | |
8905378c |
13 | CLUSTER |
14 | ======= |
15 | |
16 | * Implement rehashing and cluster check in redis-trib. |
17 | * Reimplement MIGRATE / RESTORE to use just in memory buffers (no disk at |
18 | all). This will require touching a lot of the RDB stuff around, but we may |
19 | hand with faster persistence for RDB. |
20 | * Implement the slave nodes semantics and election. |
21 | * Allow redis-trib to create a cluster-wide snapshot (using SYNC). |
22 | * Allow redis-trib to restore a cluster-wide snapshot (implement UPLOAD?). |
23 | |
70ecddc9 |
24 | SCRIPTING |
25 | ========= |
26 | |
70ecddc9 |
27 | * SCRIPT FLUSH or alike to start a fresh interpreter? |
70ecddc9 |
28 | |
4c22fd34 |
29 | OPTIMIZATIONS |
30 | ============= |
0188805d |
31 | |
682ac724 |
32 | * SORT: Don't copy the list into a vector when BY argument is constant. |
33 | * Write the hash table size of every db in the dump, so that Redis can resize the hash table just one time when loading a big DB. |
4c22fd34 |
34 | * Read-only mode for slaves. |
e9ee513b |
35 | * Redis big lists as linked lists of small ziplists? |
36 | Possibly a simple heuristic that join near nodes when some node gets smaller than the low_level, and split it into two if gets bigger than high_level. |
cef34df0 |
37 | |
38 | KNOWN BUGS |
39 | ========== |
40 | |
8231b1ef |
41 | * #519: Slave may have expired keys that were never read in the master (so a DEL |
42 | is not sent in the replication channel) but are already expired since |
5215ab14 |
43 | a lot of time. Maybe after a given delay that is undoubtably greater than |
8231b1ef |
44 | the replication link latency we should expire this key on the slave on |
45 | access? |