X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/bison.git/blobdiff_plain/f16b08196c780556cbf50691e2944960aebc46f6..c932d6135ca3e508f7136810b9b0bf79725290b9:/src/system.h diff --git a/src/system.h b/src/system.h index 57a432d0..52b597b1 100644 --- a/src/system.h +++ b/src/system.h @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ /* System-dependent definitions for Bison. - Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Free - Software Foundation, Inc. + Copyright (C) 2000-2007, 2009-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by @@ -67,13 +66,19 @@ typedef size_t uintptr_t; | GCC extensions. | `-----------------*/ -/* Use this to suppress gcc's `...may be used before initialized' - warnings. */ -#ifdef lint -# define IF_LINT(Code) Code -#else -# define IF_LINT(Code) /* empty */ -#endif +/* Use PACIFY_CC to indicate that Code is unimportant to the logic of Bison + but that it is necessary for suppressing compiler warnings. For example, + Code might be a variable initializer that's always overwritten before the + variable is used. + + PACIFY_CC is intended to be useful only as a comment as it does not alter + Code. It is tempting to redefine PACIFY_CC so that it will suppress Code + when configuring without --enable-gcc-warnings. However, that would mean + that, for maintainers, Bison would compile with potentially less warnings + and safer logic than it would for users. Due to the overhead of M4, + suppressing Code is unlikely to offer any significant improvement in + Bison's performance anyway. */ +#define PACIFY_CC(Code) Code #ifndef __attribute__ /* This feature is available in gcc versions 2.5 and later. */ @@ -123,14 +128,26 @@ typedef size_t uintptr_t; | Assertions. | `-------------*/ -/* 's assertions are too heavyweight, and can be disabled - too easily, so use aver rather than assert. */ -static inline void -aver (bool assertion) -{ - if (! assertion) - abort (); -} +/* In the past, Bison defined aver to simply invoke abort in the case of + a failed assertion. The rationale was that 's assertions + were too heavyweight and could be disabled too easily. See + discussions at + + . + + However, normal assert output can be helpful during development and + in bug reports from users. Moreover, it's not clear now that + 's assertions are significantly heavyweight. Finally, if + users want to experiment with disabling assertions, it's debatable + whether it's our responsibility to stop them. See discussion + starting at + . + + For now, we use assert but we call it aver throughout Bison in case + we later wish to try another scheme. +*/ +#include +#define aver assert /*-----------.