X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/bison.git/blobdiff_plain/df222dfaf4da6becae8665d344669eefc705d7f7..6d58c632025cb6928a90e4176577982bfb9c3981:/tests/conflicts.at

diff --git a/tests/conflicts.at b/tests/conflicts.at
index faaa3b9d..37c54050 100644
--- a/tests/conflicts.at
+++ b/tests/conflicts.at
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 # Exercising Bison on conflicts.                         -*- Autotest -*-
 
-# Copyright (C) 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009 Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc.
+# Copyright (C) 2002-2005, 2007-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
 # This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -38,7 +37,7 @@ e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
 ]])
 
 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
-[[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: e: /* empty */
+[[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: e: /* empty */ [-Wother]
 ]])
 
 AT_CLEANUP
@@ -50,20 +49,17 @@ AT_CLEANUP
 
 AT_SETUP([%nonassoc and eof])
 
+AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y],
 [[
 %{
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
+#include <assert.h>
 
 #define YYERROR_VERBOSE 1
-static void
-yyerror (const char *msg)
-{
-  fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", msg);
-}
-
+]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
 /* The current argument. */
 static const char *input;
 
@@ -71,8 +67,7 @@ static int
 yylex (void)
 {
   static size_t toknum;
-  if (! (toknum <= strlen (input)))
-    abort ();
+  assert (toknum <= strlen (input));
   return input[toknum++];
 }
 
@@ -93,47 +88,54 @@ main (int argc, const char *argv[])
   return yyparse ();
 }
 ]])
+AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
 
-# Specify the output files to avoid problems on different file systems.
-AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+m4_pushdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK],
+[AT_BISON_CHECK([$1[ -o input.c input.y]])
 AT_COMPILE([input])
 
+m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($2, [correct], [[, expecting $end]])])
+
 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
-         [syntax error, unexpected '<'
+         [syntax error, unexpected '<'AT_EXPECTING
 ])
 
 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
-         [syntax error, unexpected '>'
+         [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
 ])
 
 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
-         [syntax error, unexpected '>'
+         [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
 ])
 
-# We must disable default reductions in inconsistent states in order to
-# have an explicit list of all expected tokens.  (However, unless we use
-# canonical LR, lookahead sets are merged for different left contexts,
-# so it is still possible to have extra incorrect tokens in the expected
-# list.  That just doesn't happen to be a problem for this test case.)
-
-AT_BISON_CHECK([-Dlr.default-reductions=consistent -o input.c input.y])
-AT_COMPILE([input])
-
-AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
-AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
-         [syntax error, unexpected '<', expecting $end
-])
+m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])])
 
-AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
-AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
-         [syntax error, unexpected '>', expecting $end
-])
+# Expected token list is missing.
+AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([], [[incorrect]])
 
-AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
-         [syntax error, unexpected '>', expecting $end
-])
+# We must disable default reductions in inconsistent states in order to
+# have an explicit list of all expected tokens.
+AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reduction=consistent]],
+                          [[correct]])
+
+# lr.default-reduction=consistent happens to work for this test case.
+# However, for other grammars, lookahead sets can be merged for
+# different left contexts, so it is still possible to have an incorrect
+# expected list.  Canonical LR is almost a general solution (that is, it
+# can fail only when %nonassoc is used), so make sure it gives the same
+# result as above.
+AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr]], [[correct]])
+
+# parse.lac=full is a completely general solution that does not require
+# any of the above sacrifices.  Of course, it does not extend the
+# language-recognition power of LALR to (IE)LR, but it does ensure that
+# the reported list of expected tokens matches what the given parser
+# would have accepted in place of the unexpected token.
+AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dparse.lac=full]], [[correct]])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK])
 
 AT_CLEANUP
 
@@ -147,64 +149,224 @@ AT_SETUP([[parse.error=verbose and consistent errors]])
 
 m4_pushdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK], [
 
-AT_BISON_CHECK([$1[ -o input.c input.y]])
-AT_COMPILE([[input]])
+AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS([$1])
 
-m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($3, [ab], [[, expecting 'a' or 'b']],
-                                  $3, [a],  [[, expecting 'a']],
-                                  $3, [b],  [[, expecting 'b']])])
+m4_pushdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE],
+[AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[int yylex (yy::parser::semantic_type *lvalp)]],
+               [[int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp)]])])
 
-AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [],
-[[syntax error, unexpected ]$2[]AT_EXPECTING[
-]])
-
-m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])
+AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_DATA], [AT_DATA_GRAMMAR])([input.y],
+[AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
 
-])
+%code imports {
+  import java.io.IOException;
+}]], [[
 
-AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y],
-[[%code {
+%code {]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[
+  #include <string>]], [[
   #include <assert.h>
   #include <stdio.h>
-  int yylex (void);
-  void yyerror (char const *);
+  ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE])[
+  ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[;
   #define USE(Var)
 }
 
+]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[%defines]], [[%define api.pure]])])[
+
+]$1[
+
 %define parse.error verbose
 
-// The point isn't to test IELR here, but state merging happens to
-// complicate the example.
-%define lr.type ielr
+%%
 
-%nonassoc 'a'
+]$2[
+
+]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[%code lexer {]], [[%%]])[
+
+/*--------.
+| yylex.  |
+`--------*/]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
+
+public String input = "]$3[";
+public int index = 0;
+public int yylex ()
+{
+  if (index < input.length ())
+    return input.charAt (index++);
+  else
+    return 0;
+}
+public Object getLVal ()
+{
+  return new Integer(1);
+}]], [[
+
+]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[
+{
+  static char const *input = "]$3[";
+  *lvalp = 1;
+  return *input++;
+}]])[
+]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
+]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
+};
+
+%%]])[
 
-// If yylval=0 here, then we know that the 'a' destructor is being
-// invoked incorrectly for the 'b' set in the semantic action below.
-// All 'a' tokens are returned by yylex, which sets yylval=1.
+/*-------.
+| main.  |
+`-------*/]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
+
+class input
+{
+  public static void main (String args[]) throws IOException
+  {
+    YYParser p = new YYParser ();
+    p.parse ();
+  }
+}]], [AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  yy::parser parser;
+  return parser.parse ();
+}]], [[
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  return yyparse ();
+}]])])[
+]])
+
+AT_FULL_COMPILE([[input]])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($5, [ab], [[, expecting 'a' or 'b']],
+                                  $5, [a],  [[, expecting 'a']],
+                                  $5, [b],  [[, expecting 'b']])])
+
+AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_JAVA_PARSER_CHECK([[input]], [[0]]],
+                [AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]]]),
+[[]],
+[[syntax error, unexpected ]$4[]AT_EXPECTING[
+]])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])
+m4_popdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE])
+AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
+
+])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+[[%nonassoc 'a';
+
+start: consistent-error-on-a-a 'a' ;
+
+consistent-error-on-a-a:
+    'a' default-reduction
+  | 'a' default-reduction 'a'
+  | 'a' shift
+  ;
+
+default-reduction: /*empty*/ ;
+shift: 'b' ;
+
+// Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
+// test case looks a little more realistic.
+start: 'b' consistent-error-on-a-a 'c' ;
+]])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], [[a]])
+
+# Unfortunately, no expected tokens are reported even though 'b' can be
+# accepted.  Nevertheless, the main point of this test is to make sure
+# that at least the unexpected token is reported.  In a previous version
+# of Bison, it wasn't reported because the error is detected in a
+# consistent state with an error action, and that case always triggered
+# the simple "syntax error" message.
+#
+# The point isn't to test IELR here, but state merging happens to
+# complicate this example.
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr]],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+                             %glr-parser]],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+                             %language "c++"]],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+                             %language "java"]],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+                           [[end of input]], [[none]])
+
+# Even canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+                             %define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[ab]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+                             %define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[ab]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[ab]])
+
+# Only LAC gets it right.
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr
+                             %define parse.lac full]],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[b]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+                             %define parse.lac full]],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[b]])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR])
+m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+[[%nonassoc 'a';
+
+// If $$ = 0 here, then we know that the 'a' destructor is being invoked
+// incorrectly for the 'b' set in the semantic action below.  All 'a'
+// tokens are returned by yylex, which sets $$ = 1.
 %destructor {
   if (!$$)
     fprintf (stderr, "Wrong destructor.\n");
-} 'a'
-
-%%
-
-// The lookahead assigned by the semantic action isn't needed before
-// either error action is encountered.  In a previous version of Bison,
-// this was a problem as it meant yychar was not translated into yytoken
-// before either error action.  The second error action thus invoked a
+} 'a';
+
+// Rather than depend on an inconsistent state to induce reading a
+// lookahead as in the previous grammar, just assign the lookahead in a
+// semantic action.  That lookahead isn't needed before either error
+// action is encountered.  In a previous version of Bison, this was a
+// problem as it meant yychar was not translated into yytoken before
+// either error action.  The second error action thus invoked a
 // destructor that it selected according to the incorrect yytoken.  The
 // first error action would have reported an incorrect unexpected token
-// except that, due to another bug, the unexpected token is not reported
-// at all because the error action is the default action in a consistent
-// state.  That bug still needs to be fixed.
-start: error-reduce consistent-error 'a' { USE ($3); } ;
+// except that, due to the bug described in the previous grammar, the
+// unexpected token was not reported at all.
+start: error-reduce consistent-error 'a' { USE ($][3); } ;
 
 error-reduce:
   'a' 'a' consistent-reduction consistent-error 'a'
-  { USE (($1, $2, $5)); }
+  { USE (($][1, $][2, $][5)); }
 | 'a' error
-  { USE ($1); }
+  { USE ($][1); }
 ;
 
 consistent-reduction: /*empty*/ {
@@ -214,55 +376,157 @@ consistent-reduction: /*empty*/ {
 } ;
 
 consistent-error:
-  'a' { USE ($1); }
+  'a' { USE ($][1); }
 | /*empty*/ %prec 'a'
 ;
 
 // Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
 // test case looks a little more realistic.
 start: 'b' consistent-error 'b' ;
+]])
+m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], [[aa]])
 
-%%
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[]],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+                           [['b']], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%glr-parser]],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+                           [['b']], [[none]])
+# No C++ or Java test because yychar cannot be manipulated by users.
 
-int
-yylex (void)
-{
-  static char const *input = "aa";
-  yylval = 1;
-  return *input++;
-}
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+                           [['b']], [[none]])
 
-void
-yyerror (char const *msg)
-{
-  fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", msg);
+# Canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[a]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[a]])
+
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full]],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+                           [['b']], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full
+                             %define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+                           [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+                           [[$end]], [[none]])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR])
+m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+
+## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
+## LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states.  ##
+## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
+
+# This test case demonstrates that, when %nonassoc is used, canonical
+# LR(1) parser table construction followed by conflict resolution
+# without further state splitting is not always sufficient to produce a
+# parser that can detect all syntax errors as soon as possible on one
+# token of lookahead.  However, LAC solves the problem completely even
+# with minimal LR parser tables.
+
+AT_SETUP([[LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states]])
+AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
+AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
+[[%code {
+  #include <stdio.h>
+  ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[
+  ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[
 }
 
+%error-verbose
+%nonassoc 'a'
+
+%%
+
+start:
+  'a' problem 'a' // First context.
+| 'b' problem 'b' // Second context.
+| 'c' reduce-nonassoc // Just makes reduce-nonassoc useful.
+;
+
+problem:
+  look reduce-nonassoc
+| look 'a'
+| look 'b'
+;
+
+// For the state reached after shifting the 'a' in these productions,
+// lookahead sets are the same in both the first and second contexts.
+// Thus, canonical LR reuses the same state for both contexts.  However,
+// the lookahead 'a' for the reduction "look: 'a'" later becomes an
+// error action only in the first context.  In order to immediately
+// detect the syntax error on 'a' here for only the first context, this
+// canonical LR state would have to be split into two states, and the
+// 'a' lookahead would have to be removed from only one of the states.
+look:
+  'a' // Reduction lookahead set is always ['a', 'b'].
+| 'a' 'b'
+| 'a' 'c' // 'c' is forgotten as an expected token.
+;
+
+reduce-nonassoc: %prec 'a';
+
+%%
+]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
+]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE(["aaa"])[
+
 int
 main (void)
 {
   return yyparse ();
 }
 ]])
+AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
 
-# See comments in grammar for why this test doesn't succeed.
-AT_XFAIL_IF([[:]])
-
-AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([], [['b']], [[none]])
-AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reductions=consistent]],
-                           [['b']], [[none]])
+# Show canonical LR's failure.
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -o input.c input.y]],
+               [[0]], [[]],
+[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
+]])
+AT_COMPILE([[input]])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
+[[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b'
+]])
 
-# Canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
-AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reductions=accepting]],
-                           [[$end]], [[a]])
-AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[-Flr.type=canonical-lr]], [[$end]], [[a]])
+# It's corrected by LAC.
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -Dparse.lac=full \
+                 -o input.c input.y]], [[0]], [[]],
+[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
+]])
+AT_COMPILE([[input]])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
+[[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
+]])
 
-m4_popdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK])
+# IELR is sufficient when LAC is used.
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=ielr -Dparse.lac=full -o input.c input.y]],
+               [[0]], [[]],
+[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
+]])
+AT_COMPILE([[input]])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
+[[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
+]])
 
 AT_CLEANUP
 
-
-
 ## ------------------------- ##
 ## Unresolved SR Conflicts.  ##
 ## ------------------------- ##
@@ -278,8 +542,8 @@ exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
 ]])
 
 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
-[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
-])
+[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
+]])
 
 # Check the contents of the report.
 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
@@ -520,8 +784,8 @@ cond:
 ]])
 
 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
-[[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
-input.y:12.3-18: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: cond: cond "then" cond
+[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
+input.y:12.3-18: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: cond: cond "then" cond [-Wother]
 ]])
 
 AT_CLEANUP
@@ -564,8 +828,8 @@ id : '0';
 ]])
 
 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
-[[input.y: conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
-input.y:4.6-8: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: id: '0'
+[[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
+input.y:4.6-8: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: id: '0' [-Wother]
 ]])
 
 # Check the contents of the report.
@@ -681,9 +945,8 @@ exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
 ]])
 
 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
-[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
-input.y: expected 0 shift/reduce conflicts
-])
+[[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
+]])
 AT_CLEANUP
 
 
@@ -718,9 +981,8 @@ exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
 ]])
 
 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
-[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
-input.y: expected 2 shift/reduce conflicts
-])
+[[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 2 expected
+]])
 AT_CLEANUP
 
 
@@ -738,9 +1000,8 @@ a: 'a';
 ]])
 
 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
-[input.y: conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
-input.y: expected 0 reduce/reduce conflicts
-])
+[[input.y: error: reduce/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
+]])
 AT_CLEANUP
 
 
@@ -782,7 +1043,7 @@ e:   e '+' e
 ]])
 
 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
-[[input.y: conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
+[[input.y: warning: 4 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
 ]])
 AT_CLEANUP
 
@@ -884,14 +1145,15 @@ reported_conflicts:
 ]])
 
 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input.y]], 0, [],
-[[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce, 1 reduce/reduce
-input.y:12.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
-input.y:20.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
-input.y:21.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */
-input.y:25.13: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
-input.y:25.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
-input.y:31.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a'
-input.y:32.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */
+[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
+input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
+input.y:12.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1 [-Wother]
+input.y:20.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2 [-Wother]
+input.y:21.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */ [-Wother]
+input.y:25.13: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */ [-Wother]
+input.y:25.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */ [-Wother]
+input.y:31.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a' [-Wother]
+input.y:32.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */ [-Wother]
 ]])
 
 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output]], 0,
@@ -1031,16 +1293,17 @@ state 7
 ]])
 
 AT_DATA([[input-keep.y]],
-[[%define lr.keep-unreachable-states
+[[%define lr.keep-unreachable-state
 ]])
 AT_CHECK([[cat input.y >> input-keep.y]])
 
 AT_BISON_CHECK([[input-keep.y]], 0, [],
-[[input-keep.y: conflicts: 2 shift/reduce, 2 reduce/reduce
-input-keep.y:22.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */
-input-keep.y:26.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
-input-keep.y:32.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a'
-input-keep.y:33.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */
+[[input-keep.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
+input-keep.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
+input-keep.y:22.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */ [-Wother]
+input-keep.y:26.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */ [-Wother]
+input-keep.y:32.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a' [-Wother]
+input-keep.y:33.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */ [-Wother]
 ]])
 
 AT_CLEANUP
@@ -1193,3 +1456,147 @@ AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^state 0$/,/^state 1$/p']], 0,
 state 1
 ]])
 AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## -------------------- ##
+## %expect-rr non GLR.  ##
+## -------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([[%expect-rr non GLR]])
+
+AT_DATA([[1.y]],
+[[%expect-rr 0
+%%
+exp: 'a'
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[1.y]], [[0]], [],
+[[1.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother]
+]])
+
+AT_DATA([[2.y]],
+[[%expect-rr 1
+%%
+exp: 'a' | 'a';
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[2.y]], [[0]], [],
+[[2.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother]
+2.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
+2.y:3.12-14: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: exp: 'a' [-Wother]
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ---------------------------------- ##
+## -W versus %expect and %expect-rr.  ##
+## ---------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([[-W versus %expect and %expect-rr]])
+
+AT_DATA([[sr-rr.y]],
+[[%glr-parser
+%%
+start: 'a' | A 'a' | B 'a' ;
+A: ;
+B: ;
+]])
+AT_DATA([[sr.y]],
+[[%glr-parser
+%%
+start: 'a' | A 'a' ;
+A: ;
+]])
+AT_DATA([[rr.y]],
+[[%glr-parser
+%%
+start: A | B ;
+A: ;
+B: ;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
+[[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
+sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
+]])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-sr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
+[[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
+]])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-rr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
+[[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
+]])
+
+[
+# This is piece of code is rather complex for a simple task: try every
+# combinaison of (0 or 1 real SR) x (0 or 1 real RR) x (don't %expect
+# or %expect 0, 1, or 2 SR) x (don't %expect-rr or %expect-rr 0, 1, or 2
+# RR).
+
+# Number and types of genuine conflicts in the grammar.
+for gram in sr-rr sr rr; do
+  # Number of expected s/r conflicts.
+  for sr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
+    # Number of expected r/r conflicts.
+    for rr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
+      test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test -z "$rr_exp_i" && continue
+
+      # Build grammar file.
+      sr_exp=0
+      rr_exp=0
+      file=$gram
+      directives=
+      if test -n "$sr_exp_i"; then
+        sr_exp=$sr_exp_i
+        file=$file-expect-$sr_exp
+        directives="%expect $sr_exp"
+      fi
+      if test -n "$rr_exp_i"; then
+        rr_exp=$rr_exp_i
+        file=$file-expect-rr-$rr_exp
+        directives="$directives %expect-rr $rr_exp"
+      fi
+      file=$file.y
+      echo "$directives" > $file
+      cat $gram.y >> $file
+
+      # Number of found conflicts.
+      case $gram in
+        (sr)    sr_count=1; rr_count=0;;
+        (rr)    sr_count=0; rr_count=1;;
+        (sr-rr) sr_count=1; rr_count=1;;
+      esac
+
+      # Update number of expected conflicts: if %expect is given then
+      # %expect-rr defaults to 0, and vice-versa.  Leave empty if
+      # nothing expected.
+      case $sr_exp_i:$rr_exp_i in
+        ?:) rr_exp_i=0;;
+        :?) sr_exp_i=0;;
+      esac
+
+      # Run tests.
+      if test $sr_count -eq $sr_exp && test $rr_count -eq $rr_exp; then
+        ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]])[
+        ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]])[
+      else
+        {
+          if test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test "$sr_count" -ne 0; then
+            echo "warning: $sr_count shift/reduce conflicts"
+          elif test "$sr_exp_i" -ne "$sr_count"; then
+            echo "error: shift/reduce conflicts: $sr_count found, $sr_exp_i expected"
+          fi
+          if test -z "$rr_exp_i" && test "$rr_count" -ne 0; then
+            echo "warning: $rr_count reduce/reduce conflicts"
+          elif test "$rr_exp_i" -ne "$rr_count"; then
+            echo "error: reduce/reduce conflicts: $rr_count found, $rr_exp_i expected"
+          fi
+        } | sed -e "s/^/$file: /" > experr
+        ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
+        ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
+      fi
+    done
+  done
+done]
+
+AT_CLEANUP