X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/bison.git/blobdiff_plain/ab7f29f8f9a7ad89b6a3163f913e1ee2b7889223..5860cc8c1c8b67d7af455f7f0fe9e9e1464366b3:/tests/regression.at?ds=inline diff --git a/tests/regression.at b/tests/regression.at index a3e7d4f7..a4b20de5 100644 --- a/tests/regression.at +++ b/tests/regression.at @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ int yylex (void); %token C_TOKEN 'c' %token 'd' D_TOKEN %token SPECIAL "\\\'\?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\201\x001\x000081??!" +%token SPECIAL "\\\'\?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\201\x001\x000081??!" %% exp: "a" "\\\'\?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\201\x001\x000081??!"; %% @@ -469,10 +470,22 @@ main (void) } ]]) -AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y]) +# Checking the warning message guarantees that the trigraph "??!" isn't +# unnecessarily escaped here even though it would need to be if encoded in a +# C-string literal. Also notice that unnecessary escaping, such as "\?", from +# the user specification is eliminated. +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], [[0]], [[]], +[[input.y:22.8-14: warning: symbol SPECIAL redeclared +input.y:22.8-63: warning: symbol `"\\'?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\201\001\201??!"' used more than once as a literal string +]]) AT_COMPILE([input]) + +# Checking the error message here guarantees that yytname, which does contain +# C-string literals, does have the trigraph escaped correctly. Thus, the +# symbol name reported by the parser is exactly the same as that reported by +# Bison itself. AT_DATA([experr], -[[syntax error, unexpected "\\'?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\201\001\201?\?!", expecting a +[[syntax error, unexpected "\\'?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\201\001\201??!", expecting a ]]) AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input], 1, [], [experr]) AT_CLEANUP @@ -741,15 +754,6 @@ AT_CHECK([[cat tables.c]], 0, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 }; -static const yytype_uint8 yyprhs[] = -{ - 0, 0, 3, 5, 6, 9, 14 -}; -static const yytype_int8 yyrhs[] = -{ - 8, 0, -1, 9, -1, -1, 10, 11, -1, 3, - 4, 5, 8, -1, 6, 8, -1 -}; static const yytype_uint8 yyrline[] = { 0, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5 @@ -763,32 +767,24 @@ static const yytype_uint16 yytoknum[] = { 0, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261 }; -static const yytype_uint8 yyr1[] = -{ - 0, 7, 8, 9, 9, 10, 11 -}; -static const yytype_uint8 yyr2[] = +static const yytype_int8 yypact[] = { - 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 4, 2 + -2, -1, 4, -8, 0, 2, -8, -2, -8, -2, + -8, -8 }; static const yytype_uint8 yydefact[] = { 3, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 1, 3, 4, 3, 6, 5 }; -static const yytype_int8 yydefgoto[] = -{ - -1, 2, 3, 4, 8 -}; -static const yytype_int8 yypact[] = -{ - -2, -1, 4, -8, 0, 2, -8, -2, -8, -2, - -8, -8 -}; static const yytype_int8 yypgoto[] = { -8, -7, -8, -8, -8 }; +static const yytype_int8 yydefgoto[] = +{ + -1, 2, 3, 4, 8 +}; static const yytype_uint8 yytable[] = { 10, 1, 11, 5, 6, 0, 7, 9 @@ -802,6 +798,14 @@ static const yytype_uint8 yystos[] = 0, 3, 8, 9, 10, 4, 0, 6, 11, 5, 8, 8 }; +static const yytype_uint8 yyr1[] = +{ + 0, 7, 8, 9, 9, 10, 11 +}; +static const yytype_uint8 yyr2[] = +{ + 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 4, 2 +}; ]]) AT_CLEANUP @@ -874,7 +878,7 @@ member: STRING AT_LALR1_CC_IF( [/* A C++ error reporting function. */ void -yy::parser::error (const location&, const std::string& m) +yy::parser::error (const std::string& m) { std::cerr << m << std::endl; } @@ -926,11 +930,7 @@ m4_define([AT_CHECK_DANCER], AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS([$1]) _AT_DATA_DANCER_Y([$1]) AT_BISON_CHECK([-o dancer.c dancer.y]) -AT_LALR1_CC_IF( - [AT_BISON_CHECK([-o dancer.cc dancer.y]) - AT_COMPILE_CXX([dancer])], - [AT_BISON_CHECK([-o dancer.c dancer.y]) - AT_COMPILE([dancer])]) +AT_FULL_COMPILE([dancer]) AT_PARSER_CHECK([./dancer], 1, [], [syntax error, unexpected ':' ]) @@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ t: A | B; AT_LALR1_CC_IF( [/* A C++ error reporting function. */ void -yy::parser::error (const location&, const std::string& m) +yy::parser::error (const std::string& m) { std::cerr << m << std::endl; } @@ -1026,11 +1026,7 @@ m4_define([AT_CHECK_EXPECT2], AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS([$1]) _AT_DATA_EXPECT2_Y([$1]) AT_BISON_CHECK([-o expect2.c expect2.y]) -AT_LALR1_CC_IF( - [AT_BISON_CHECK([-o expect2.cc expect2.y]) - AT_COMPILE_CXX([expect2])], - [AT_BISON_CHECK([-o expect2.c expect2.y]) - AT_COMPILE([expect2])]) +AT_FULL_COMPILE([expect2]) AT_PARSER_CHECK([./expect2], 1, [], [syntax error, unexpected '+', expecting A or B ]) @@ -1188,7 +1184,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP ## Token number in precedence declaration. ## ## ---------------------------------------- ## -AT_SETUP([[Token number in precedence declaration.]]) +AT_SETUP([[Token number in precedence declaration]]) # POSIX says token numbers can be declared in %left, %right, and %nonassoc, but # we lost this in Bison 1.50.