X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/bison.git/blobdiff_plain/74ffbcb6bf2b471ef16c485830a3084978fa29f7..29e8831621af57c5056380b68a96337e7647b850:/tests/regression.at diff --git a/tests/regression.at b/tests/regression.at index 70e3420b..9d55cf64 100644 --- a/tests/regression.at +++ b/tests/regression.at @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ AT_BANNER([[Regression tests.]]) AT_SETUP([Duplicate string]) -AT_DATA([duplicate.y], +AT_DATA([input.y], [[/* `Bison -v' used to dump core when two tokens are defined with the same string, as LE and GE below. */ @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ exp: '(' exp ')' | NUM ; %% ]]) -AT_CHECK([bison -v duplicate.y -o duplicate.c], 0, ignore, ignore) +AT_CHECK([bison -v input.y -o input.c], 0, ignore, ignore) AT_CLEANUP @@ -61,19 +61,20 @@ AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c -v], 0, [], # Check the contents of the report. AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [], -[[State 4 contains 1 shift/reduce conflict. +[[State 5 contains 1 shift/reduce conflict. Grammar Number, Line, Rule + 0 3 $axiom -> exp $ 1 3 exp -> exp OP exp 2 3 exp -> NUM Terminals, with rules where they appear -$ (-1) +$ (0) 0 error (256) NUM (257) 2 OP (258) 1 @@ -81,8 +82,10 @@ OP (258) 1 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear -exp (5) - on left: 1 2, on right: 1 +$axiom (5) + on left: 0 +exp (6) + on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1 state 0 @@ -103,44 +106,41 @@ state 1 state 2 + $axiom -> exp . $ (rule 0) exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1) - $ go to state 5 - OP shift, and go to state 3 + $ shift, and go to state 3 + OP shift, and go to state 4 state 3 - exp -> exp OP . exp (rule 1) - - NUM shift, and go to state 1 - - exp go to state 4 + $axiom -> exp $ . (rule 0) + $default accept state 4 - exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1) - exp -> exp OP exp . (rule 1) + exp -> exp OP . exp (rule 1) - OP shift, and go to state 3 + NUM shift, and go to state 1 - OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)] - $default reduce using rule 1 (exp) + exp go to state 5 state 5 - $ go to state 6 - + exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1) + exp -> exp OP exp . (rule 1) + OP shift, and go to state 4 -state 6 + OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)] + $default reduce using rule 1 (exp) - $default accept ]]) @@ -165,19 +165,20 @@ AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c -v], 0, [], []) # Check the contents of the report. AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [], -[[Conflict in state 4 between rule 1 and token OP resolved as shift. +[[Conflict in state 5 between rule 2 and token OP resolved as shift. Grammar Number, Line, Rule + 0 4 $axiom -> exp $ 1 4 exp -> exp OP exp 2 4 exp -> NUM Terminals, with rules where they appear -$ (-1) +$ (0) 0 error (256) NUM (257) 2 OP (258) 1 @@ -185,8 +186,10 @@ OP (258) 1 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear -exp (5) - on left: 1 2, on right: 1 +$axiom (5) + on left: 0 +exp (6) + on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1 state 0 @@ -207,43 +210,40 @@ state 1 state 2 + $axiom -> exp . $ (rule 0) exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1) - $ go to state 5 - OP shift, and go to state 3 + $ shift, and go to state 3 + OP shift, and go to state 4 state 3 - exp -> exp OP . exp (rule 1) - - NUM shift, and go to state 1 - - exp go to state 4 + $axiom -> exp $ . (rule 0) + $default accept state 4 - exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1) - exp -> exp OP exp . (rule 1) + exp -> exp OP . exp (rule 1) - OP shift, and go to state 3 + NUM shift, and go to state 1 - $default reduce using rule 1 (exp) + exp go to state 5 state 5 - $ go to state 6 - + exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1) + exp -> exp OP exp . (rule 1) + OP shift, and go to state 4 -state 6 + $default reduce using rule 1 (exp) - $default accept ]]) @@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [], [[Grammar Number, Line, Rule + 0 2 $axiom -> expr $ 1 2 @1 -> /* empty */ 2 2 expr -> 'a' @1 'b' 3 15 @2 -> /* empty */ @@ -304,7 +305,7 @@ AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [], Terminals, with rules where they appear -$ (-1) +$ (0) 0 'a' (97) 2 'b' (98) 2 'c' (99) 4 @@ -313,11 +314,13 @@ error (256) Nonterminals, with rules where they appear -expr (6) - on left: 2 4 -@1 (7) +$axiom (6) + on left: 0 +expr (7) + on left: 2 4, on right: 0 +@1 (8) on left: 1, on right: 2 -@2 (8) +@2 (9) on left: 3, on right: 4 @@ -327,8 +330,8 @@ state 0 $default reduce using rule 3 (@2) - expr go to state 6 - @2 go to state 2 + expr go to state 2 + @2 go to state 3 @@ -338,57 +341,55 @@ state 1 $default reduce using rule 1 (@1) - @1 go to state 3 + @1 go to state 4 state 2 - expr -> @2 . 'c' (rule 4) + $axiom -> expr . $ (rule 0) - 'c' shift, and go to state 4 + $ shift, and go to state 5 state 3 - expr -> 'a' @1 . 'b' (rule 2) + expr -> @2 . 'c' (rule 4) - 'b' shift, and go to state 5 + 'c' shift, and go to state 6 state 4 - expr -> @2 'c' . (rule 4) + expr -> 'a' @1 . 'b' (rule 2) - $default reduce using rule 4 (expr) + 'b' shift, and go to state 7 state 5 - expr -> 'a' @1 'b' . (rule 2) - - $default reduce using rule 2 (expr) + $axiom -> expr $ . (rule 0) + $default accept state 6 - $ go to state 7 - + expr -> @2 'c' . (rule 4) + $default reduce using rule 4 (expr) -state 7 - $ go to state 8 +state 7 + expr -> 'a' @1 'b' . (rule 2) -state 8 + $default reduce using rule 2 (expr) - $default accept ]]) @@ -484,7 +485,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP AT_SETUP([%union and --defines]) -AT_DATA([union.y], +AT_DATA([input.y], [%union { int integer; @@ -494,30 +495,7 @@ AT_DATA([union.y], exp: {}; ]) -AT_CHECK([bison --defines union.y]) - -AT_CLEANUP - - -## --------------------------------------- ## -## Duplicate '/' in C comments in %union ## -## --------------------------------------- ## - - -AT_SETUP([%union and C comments]) - -AT_DATA([union-comment.y], -[%union -{ - /* The int. */ int integer; - /* The string. */ char *string ; -} -%% -exp: {}; -]) - -AT_CHECK([bison union-comment.y]) -AT_CHECK([fgrep '//*' union-comment.tab.c], [1], []) +AT_CHECK([bison --defines input.y]) AT_CLEANUP @@ -613,76 +591,238 @@ AT_TEST_CPP_GUARD_H([input/input]) AT_TEST_CPP_GUARD_H([9foo]) -## ---------------- ## -## Broken Closure. ## -## ---------------- ## -# TC was once broken during a massive `simplification' of the code. -# It resulted in bison dumping core on the following grammar (the -# computation of FIRSTS uses TC). It managed to produce a pretty -# exotic closure: -# -# TC: Input -# -# 01234567 -# +--------+ -# 0| 1 | -# 1| 1 | -# 2| 1 | -# 3| 1 | -# 4| 1 | -# 5| 1 | -# 6| 1| -# 7| | -# +--------+ +## -------------- ## +## Web2c Report. ## +## -------------- ## + +# The generation of the reduction was once wrong in Bison, and made it +# miss some reductions. In the following test case, the reduction on +# `undef_id_tok' in state 1 was missing. This is stripped down from +# the actual web2c.y. + +AT_SETUP([Web2c Report]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%token undef_id_tok const_id_tok + +%start CONST_DEC_PART + +%% +CONST_DEC_PART: + CONST_DEC_LIST + ; + +CONST_DEC_LIST: + CONST_DEC + | CONST_DEC_LIST CONST_DEC + ; + +CONST_DEC: + { } undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok ';' + ; +%% + +]]) + +AT_CHECK([bison -v input.y]) + +AT_CHECK([sed -n 's/ *$//;/^$/!p' input.output], 0, +[[Grammar + Number, Line, Rule + 0 6 $axiom -> CONST_DEC_PART $ + 1 6 CONST_DEC_PART -> CONST_DEC_LIST + 2 10 CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC + 3 12 CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC_LIST CONST_DEC + 4 15 @1 -> /* empty */ + 5 15 CONST_DEC -> @1 undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok ';' +Terminals, with rules where they appear +$ (0) 0 +';' (59) 5 +'=' (61) 5 +error (256) +undef_id_tok (257) 5 +const_id_tok (258) 5 +Nonterminals, with rules where they appear +$axiom (7) + on left: 0 +CONST_DEC_PART (8) + on left: 1, on right: 0 +CONST_DEC_LIST (9) + on left: 2 3, on right: 1 3 +CONST_DEC (10) + on left: 5, on right: 2 3 +@1 (11) + on left: 4, on right: 5 +state 0 + $default reduce using rule 4 (@1) + CONST_DEC_PART go to state 1 + CONST_DEC_LIST go to state 2 + CONST_DEC go to state 3 + @1 go to state 4 +state 1 + $axiom -> CONST_DEC_PART . $ (rule 0) + $ shift, and go to state 5 +state 2 + CONST_DEC_PART -> CONST_DEC_LIST . (rule 1) + CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC_LIST . CONST_DEC (rule 3) + undef_id_tok reduce using rule 4 (@1) + $default reduce using rule 1 (CONST_DEC_PART) + CONST_DEC go to state 6 + @1 go to state 4 +state 3 + CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC . (rule 2) + $default reduce using rule 2 (CONST_DEC_LIST) +state 4 + CONST_DEC -> @1 . undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok ';' (rule 5) + undef_id_tok shift, and go to state 7 +state 5 + $axiom -> CONST_DEC_PART $ . (rule 0) + $default accept +state 6 + CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC_LIST CONST_DEC . (rule 3) + $default reduce using rule 3 (CONST_DEC_LIST) +state 7 + CONST_DEC -> @1 undef_id_tok . '=' const_id_tok ';' (rule 5) + '=' shift, and go to state 8 +state 8 + CONST_DEC -> @1 undef_id_tok '=' . const_id_tok ';' (rule 5) + const_id_tok shift, and go to state 9 +state 9 + CONST_DEC -> @1 undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok . ';' (rule 5) + ';' shift, and go to state 10 +state 10 + CONST_DEC -> @1 undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok ';' . (rule 5) + $default reduce using rule 5 (CONST_DEC) +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + +## --------------- ## +## Web2c Actions. ## +## --------------- ## + +# The generation of the mapping `state -> action' was once wrong in +# extremely specific situations. web2c.y exhibits this situation. +# Below is a stripped version of the grammar. It looks like one can +# simplify it further, but just don't: it is tuned to exhibit a bug, +# which disapears when applying sane grammar transformations. # -# TC: Output +# It used to be wrong on yydefact only: # -# 01234567 -# +--------+ -# 0| 1 | -# 1| 111 | -# 2| 111 | -# 3| 1111 | -# 4| 111 1 | -# 5| 111 1 | -# 6| 111 1| -# 7| 111 | -# +--------+ +# static const short yydefact[] = +# { +# - 2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, +# + 2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 3, 2, 5, 4, +# 0, 0 +# }; # -# instead of that below. +# but let's check all the tables. + -AT_SETUP([Broken Closure]) +AT_SETUP([Web2c Actions]) AT_DATA([input.y], [[%% -a: b -b: c -c: d -d: e -e: f -f: g -g: h -h: 'h' +statement: struct_stat; +struct_stat: /* empty. */ | if else; +if: "if" "const" "then" statement; +else: "else" statement; +%% ]]) -AT_CHECK([bison --trace input.y 2>&1 | - sed -n '/^TC: Output BEGIN/,/^TC: Output END/p'], - [0], -[[TC: Output BEGIN - @&t@ - 01234567 - +--------+ - 0| 1111111| - 1| 111111| - 2| 11111| - 3| 1111| - 4| 111| - 5| 11| - 6| 1| - 7| | - +--------+ -TC: Output END +AT_CHECK([bison -v input.y -o input.c]) + +# Check only the tables. We don't use --no-parser, because it is +# still to be implemented in the experimental branch of Bison. +AT_CHECK([[sed -n 's/ *$//;/^static const.*\[\] =/,/^}/p' input.c]], 0, +[[static const char yytranslate[] = +{ + 0, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, + 6 +}; +static const short yyprhs[] = +{ + 0, 0, 3, 5, 6, 9, 14 +}; +static const short yyrhs[] = +{ + 8, 0, -1, 9, -1, -1, 10, 11, -1, 3, + 4, 5, 8, -1, 6, 8, -1 +}; +static const short yyrline[] = +{ + 0, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5 +}; +static const char *const yytname[] = +{ + "$", "error", "$undefined.", "\"if\"", "\"const\"", "\"then\"", + "\"else\"", "$axiom", "statement", "struct_stat", "if", "else", NULL +}; +static const short yytoknum[] = +{ + 0, 256, 2, 257, 258, 259, 260, -1 +}; +static const short yyr1[] = +{ + 0, 7, 8, 9, 9, 10, 11 +}; +static const short yyr2[] = +{ + 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 4, 2 +}; +static const short yydefact[] = +{ + 3, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 3, 4, 3, + 6, 5 +}; +static const short yydefgoto[] = +{ + -1, 2, 3, 4, 8 +}; +static const short yypact[] = +{ + -2, -1, 4,-32768, 0, 2,-32768, -2,-32768, -2, + -32768,-32768 +}; +static const short yypgoto[] = +{ + -32768, -7,-32768,-32768,-32768 +}; +static const short yytable[] = +{ + 10, 1, 11, 5, 6, 0, 7, 9 +}; +static const short yycheck[] = +{ + 7, 3, 9, 4, 0, -1, 6, 5 +}; ]]) AT_CLEANUP