X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/bison.git/blobdiff_plain/6e649e659ebc2d8b54fa4636986370b76c2ff988..11d820174fef8e2037ee512f5a5560a2cecd6e1d:/tests/conflicts.at diff --git a/tests/conflicts.at b/tests/conflicts.at index f3fe7821..03b8fa20 100644 --- a/tests/conflicts.at +++ b/tests/conflicts.at @@ -1,23 +1,264 @@ # Exercising Bison on conflicts. -*- Autotest -*- -# Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify -# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by -# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) -# any later version. +# Copyright (C) 2002-2005, 2007-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or +# (at your option) any later version. +# # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the # GNU General Public License for more details. - +# # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License -# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software -# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA -# 02111-1307, USA. +# along with this program. If not, see . AT_BANNER([[Conflicts.]]) +## ------------------------- ## +## Token declaration order. ## +## ------------------------- ## + +# This test checks that token are declared left to right when in a precedence +# statement. + +AT_SETUP([Token declaration order]) + +AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS + +AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]], +[[%code { + #include + ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[ + ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[ +} +%token A B C +%token D +%right E F G +%right H I +%right J +%left K +%left L M N +%nonassoc O P Q +%precedence R S T U +%precedence V W +%% +exp: A +%% +]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[ +]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE[ +int main (void) +{ + assert (A < B); + assert (B < C); + assert (C < D); + assert (D < E); + assert (E < F); + assert (F < G); + assert (G < H); + assert (H < I); + assert (I < J); + assert (J < K); + assert (K < L); + assert (L < M); + assert (M < N); + assert (N < O); + assert (O < P); + assert (P < Q); + assert (Q < R); + assert (R < S); + assert (S < T); + assert (T < U); + assert (U < V); + assert (V < W); + return 0; +} +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y]) +AT_COMPILE([input]) + +AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input]) + +AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS + +AT_CLEANUP + + +## --------------------------------------------------- ## +## Token declaration order: literals vs. identifiers. ## +## --------------------------------------------------- ## + +# This test checks that when several tokens are declared by the same keyword, +# some of them defined as a character ('a'), others as simple textual reference +# (A), they are declared correctly left to right. +# Previously, the following test would declare the states in the order 'o' 'p' +# M N, instead of M N 'o' 'p'. + +AT_SETUP([Token declaration order: literals vs. identifiers]) + +AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]], +[[%token 'a' 'b' C D +%token E F 'g' 'h' +%right 'i' 'j' K L +%right M N 'o' 'p' +%% +exp: 'a' + | 'b' + | C + | D + | E + | F + | 'g' + | 'h' + | 'i' + | 'j' + | K + | L + | M + | N + | 'o' + | 'p' +; +%% +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore]) +AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0, +[[State 0 + + 0 $accept: . exp $end + 1 exp: . 'a' + 2 | . 'b' + 3 | . C + 4 | . D + 5 | . E + 6 | . F + 7 | . 'g' + 8 | . 'h' + 9 | . 'i' + 10 | . 'j' + 11 | . K + 12 | . L + 13 | . M + 14 | . N + 15 | . 'o' + 16 | . 'p' + + 'a' shift, and go to state 1 + 'b' shift, and go to state 2 + C shift, and go to state 3 + D shift, and go to state 4 + E shift, and go to state 5 + F shift, and go to state 6 + 'g' shift, and go to state 7 + 'h' shift, and go to state 8 + 'i' shift, and go to state 9 + 'j' shift, and go to state 10 + K shift, and go to state 11 + L shift, and go to state 12 + M shift, and go to state 13 + N shift, and go to state 14 + 'o' shift, and go to state 15 + 'p' shift, and go to state 16 + + exp go to state 17 + + +State 1 +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ------------------------------- ## +## Useless associativity warning. ## +## ------------------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([Useless associativity warning]) + +AT_DATA([[input.y]], +[[%token EQ "=" PL "+" ST "*" LP "(" +%nonassoc "=" +%left "+" +%left "*" +%precedence "(" +%% +stmt: + exp +| "var" "=" exp +; + +exp: + exp "+" exp +| exp "*" "num" +| "(" exp ")" +| "num" +; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wprecedence input.y], 0, [], +[[input.y:2.1-9: warning: useless precedence and associativity for "=" [-Wprecedence] +input.y:4.1-5: warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence [-Wprecedence] +input.y:5.1-11: warning: useless precedence for "(" [-Wprecedence] +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ---------------------------- ## +## Useless precedence warning. ## +## ---------------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([Useless precedence warning]) + +AT_DATA([[input.y]], +[[%token A B U V W X Y Z +%precedence Z +%left X +%precedence Y +%left W +%right V +%nonassoc U +%% +a: b + | a U b + | f +; +b: c + | b V c +; +c: d + | c W d +; +d: A + | d X d + | d Y A +; +f: B + | f Z B +; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wprecedence -fcaret -o input.c input.y], 0, [], +[[input.y:7.1-9: warning: useless precedence and associativity for U [-Wprecedence] + %nonassoc U + ^^^^^^^^^ +input.y:6.1-6: warning: useless precedence and associativity for V [-Wprecedence] + %right V + ^^^^^^ +input.y:5.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for W [-Wprecedence] + %left W + ^^^^^ +input.y:2.1-11: warning: useless precedence for Z [-Wprecedence] + %precedence Z + ^^^^^^^^^^^ +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + ## ---------------- ## ## S/R in initial. ## @@ -37,8 +278,14 @@ exp: e 'e'; e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */; ]]) -AT_CHECK([bison -o input.c input.y], 0, [], -[[input.y:4.8: warning: rule never reduced because of conflicts: e: /* empty */ +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [], +[[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-fcaret -o input.c input.y], 0, [], +[[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] + e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */; + ^ ]]) AT_CLEANUP @@ -50,34 +297,26 @@ AT_CLEANUP AT_SETUP([%nonassoc and eof]) +AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y], [[ %{ #include - -#if STDC_HEADERS -# include -#endif +#include +#include +#include #define YYERROR_VERBOSE 1 -static void -yyerror (const char *msg) -{ - fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", msg); - exit (1); -} - +]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[ /* The current argument. */ -static const char *input = NULL; +static const char *input; static int yylex (void) { - /* No token stands for end of file. */ - if (input && *input) - return *input++; - else - return 0; + static size_t toknum; + assert (toknum <= strlen (input)); + return input[toknum++]; } %} @@ -93,37 +332,426 @@ expr: expr '<' expr int main (int argc, const char *argv[]) { - if (argc > 1) - input = argv[1]; + input = argc <= 1 ? "" : argv[1]; return yyparse (); } ]]) +AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS -# Specify the output files to avoid problems on different file systems. -AT_CHECK([bison -o input.c input.y]) +m4_pushdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK], +[AT_BISON_CHECK([$1[ -o input.c input.y]]) AT_COMPILE([input]) +m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($2, [correct], [[, expecting $end]])]) + AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0']) -# FIXME: This is an actual bug, but a new one, in the sense that -# no one has ever spotted it! The messages are *wrong*: there should -# be nothing there, it should be expected eof. AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [], - [syntax error, unexpected '<', expecting '<' or '>' + [syntax error, unexpected '<'AT_EXPECTING ]) AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0']) AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [], - [syntax error, unexpected '>', expecting '<' or '>' + [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING ]) AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [], - [syntax error, unexpected '>', expecting '<' or '>' + [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING ]) +m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])]) + +# Expected token list is missing. +AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([], [[incorrect]]) + +# We must disable default reductions in inconsistent states in order to +# have an explicit list of all expected tokens. +AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reduction=consistent]], + [[correct]]) + +# lr.default-reduction=consistent happens to work for this test case. +# However, for other grammars, lookahead sets can be merged for +# different left contexts, so it is still possible to have an incorrect +# expected list. Canonical LR is almost a general solution (that is, it +# can fail only when %nonassoc is used), so make sure it gives the same +# result as above. +AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr]], [[correct]]) + +# parse.lac=full is a completely general solution that does not require +# any of the above sacrifices. Of course, it does not extend the +# language-recognition power of LALR to (IE)LR, but it does ensure that +# the reported list of expected tokens matches what the given parser +# would have accepted in place of the unexpected token. +AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dparse.lac=full]], [[correct]]) + +m4_popdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK]) + AT_CLEANUP +## ------------------------------------------- ## +## parse.error=verbose and consistent errors. ## +## ------------------------------------------- ## + +m4_pushdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK], [ + +AT_SETUP([[parse.error=verbose and consistent errors: $1]]) + +AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS([$1]) + +m4_pushdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE], +[AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[int yylex (yy::parser::semantic_type *lvalp)]], + [[int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp)]])]) + +AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_DATA], [AT_DATA_GRAMMAR])([input.y], +[AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[ + +%code imports { + import java.io.IOException; +}]], [[ + +%code {]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[ + #include ]], [[ + #include + #include + ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE])[ + ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[; + #define USE(Var) +} + +]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[%defines]], [[%define api.pure]])])[ + +]$1[ + +%define parse.error verbose + +%% + +]$2[ + +]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[%code lexer {]], [[%%]])[ + +/*--------. +| yylex. | +`--------*/]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[ + +public String input = "]$3["; +public int index = 0; +public int yylex () +{ + if (index < input.length ()) + return input.charAt (index++); + else + return 0; +} +public Object getLVal () +{ + return new Integer(1); +}]], [[ + +]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[ +{ + static char const *input = "]$3["; + *lvalp = 1; + return *input++; +}]])[ +]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[ +]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[ +}; + +%%]])[ + +/*-------. +| main. | +`-------*/ +]AT_MAIN_DEFINE +]) + +AT_FULL_COMPILE([[input]]) + +m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($5, [ab], [[, expecting 'a' or 'b']], + $5, [a], [[, expecting 'a']], + $5, [b], [[, expecting 'b']])]) + +AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_JAVA_PARSER_CHECK([[input]], [[0]]], + [AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]]]), +[[]], +[[syntax error, unexpected ]$4[]AT_EXPECTING[ +]]) + +m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING]) +m4_popdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE]) +AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS + +AT_CLEANUP +]) dnl AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK + + + + +m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR], +[[%nonassoc 'a'; + +start: consistent-error-on-a-a 'a' ; + +consistent-error-on-a-a: + 'a' default-reduction + | 'a' default-reduction 'a' + | 'a' shift + ; + +default-reduction: /*empty*/ ; +shift: 'b' ; + +// Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this +// test case looks a little more realistic. +start: 'b' consistent-error-on-a-a 'c' ; +]]) + +m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], [[a]]) + +# Unfortunately, no expected tokens are reported even though 'b' can be +# accepted. Nevertheless, the main point of this test is to make sure +# that at least the unexpected token is reported. In a previous version +# of Bison, it wasn't reported because the error is detected in a +# consistent state with an error action, and that case always triggered +# the simple "syntax error" message. +# +# The point isn't to test IELR here, but state merging happens to +# complicate this example. +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr]], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[none]]) +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr + %glr-parser]], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[none]]) +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr + %language "c++"]], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[none]]) +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr + %language "java"]], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], + [[end of input]], [[none]]) + +# Even canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'! +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr + %define lr.default-reduction consistent]], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[ab]]) +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr + %define lr.default-reduction accepting]], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[ab]]) +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[ab]]) + +# Only LAC gets it right. +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr + %define parse.lac full]], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[b]]) +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr + %define parse.lac full]], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR], + [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[b]]) + +m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR]) +m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT]) + +m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR], +[[%nonassoc 'a'; + +// If $$ = 0 here, then we know that the 'a' destructor is being invoked +// incorrectly for the 'b' set in the semantic action below. All 'a' +// tokens are returned by yylex, which sets $$ = 1. +%destructor { + if (!$$) + fprintf (stderr, "Wrong destructor.\n"); +} 'a'; + +// Rather than depend on an inconsistent state to induce reading a +// lookahead as in the previous grammar, just assign the lookahead in a +// semantic action. That lookahead isn't needed before either error +// action is encountered. In a previous version of Bison, this was a +// problem as it meant yychar was not translated into yytoken before +// either error action. The second error action thus invoked a +// destructor that it selected according to the incorrect yytoken. The +// first error action would have reported an incorrect unexpected token +// except that, due to the bug described in the previous grammar, the +// unexpected token was not reported at all. +start: error-reduce consistent-error 'a' { USE ($][3); } ; + +error-reduce: + 'a' 'a' consistent-reduction consistent-error 'a' + { USE (($][1, $][2, $][5)); } +| 'a' error + { USE ($][1); } +; + +consistent-reduction: /*empty*/ { + assert (yychar == YYEMPTY); + yylval = 0; + yychar = 'b'; +} ; + +consistent-error: + 'a' { USE ($][1); } +| /*empty*/ %prec 'a' +; + +// Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this +// test case looks a little more realistic. +start: 'b' consistent-error 'b' ; +]]) +m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], [[aa]]) + +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[]], + [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR], + [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], + [['b']], [[none]]) +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%glr-parser]], + [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR], + [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], + [['b']], [[none]]) +# No C++ or Java test because yychar cannot be manipulated by users. + +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction consistent]], + [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR], + [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], + [['b']], [[none]]) + +# Canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'! +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction accepting]], + [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR], + [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[a]]) +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]], + [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR], + [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[a]]) + +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full]], + [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR], + [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], + [['b']], [[none]]) +AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full + %define lr.default-reduction accepting]], + [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR], + [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], + [[$end]], [[none]]) + +m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR]) +m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT]) + +m4_popdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK]) + + + + +## ------------------------------------------------------- ## +## LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states. ## +## ------------------------------------------------------- ## + +# This test case demonstrates that, when %nonassoc is used, canonical +# LR(1) parser table construction followed by conflict resolution +# without further state splitting is not always sufficient to produce a +# parser that can detect all syntax errors as soon as possible on one +# token of lookahead. However, LAC solves the problem completely even +# with minimal LR parser tables. + +AT_SETUP([[LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states]]) +AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS +AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]], +[[%code { + #include + ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[ + ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[ +} + +%error-verbose +%nonassoc 'a' + +%% + +start: + 'a' problem 'a' // First context. +| 'b' problem 'b' // Second context. +| 'c' reduce-nonassoc // Just makes reduce-nonassoc useful. +; + +problem: + look reduce-nonassoc +| look 'a' +| look 'b' +; + +// For the state reached after shifting the 'a' in these productions, +// lookahead sets are the same in both the first and second contexts. +// Thus, canonical LR reuses the same state for both contexts. However, +// the lookahead 'a' for the reduction "look: 'a'" later becomes an +// error action only in the first context. In order to immediately +// detect the syntax error on 'a' here for only the first context, this +// canonical LR state would have to be split into two states, and the +// 'a' lookahead would have to be removed from only one of the states. +look: + 'a' // Reduction lookahead set is always ['a', 'b']. +| 'a' 'b' +| 'a' 'c' // 'c' is forgotten as an expected token. +; + +reduce-nonassoc: %prec 'a'; + +%% +]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[ +]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE(["aaa"])[ +]AT_MAIN_DEFINE +]) +AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS + +# Show canonical LR's failure. +AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -o input.c input.y]], + [[0]], [[]], +[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr] +]]) +AT_COMPILE([[input]]) +AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]], +[[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' +]]) + +# It's corrected by LAC. +AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -Dparse.lac=full \ + -o input.c input.y]], [[0]], [[]], +[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr] +]]) +AT_COMPILE([[input]]) +AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]], +[[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c' +]]) + +# IELR is sufficient when LAC is used. +AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=ielr -Dparse.lac=full -o input.c input.y]], + [[0]], [[]], +[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr] +]]) +AT_COMPILE([[input]]) +AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]], +[[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c' +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + ## ------------------------- ## ## Unresolved SR Conflicts. ## ## ------------------------- ## @@ -138,13 +766,13 @@ AT_DATA([input.y], exp: exp OP exp | NUM; ]]) -AT_CHECK([bison -o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [], -[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict -]) +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [], +[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr] +]]) # Check the contents of the report. AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [], -[[State 5 contains 1 shift/reduce conflict. +[[State 5 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce Grammar @@ -171,7 +799,7 @@ exp (6) on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1 -state 0 +State 0 0 $accept: . exp $end 1 exp: . exp OP exp @@ -182,14 +810,14 @@ state 0 exp go to state 2 -state 1 +State 1 2 exp: NUM . $default reduce using rule 2 (exp) -state 2 +State 2 0 $accept: exp . $end 1 exp: exp . OP exp @@ -198,14 +826,14 @@ state 2 OP shift, and go to state 4 -state 3 +State 3 0 $accept: exp $end . $default accept -state 4 +State 4 1 exp: . exp OP exp 1 | exp OP . exp @@ -216,9 +844,9 @@ state 4 exp go to state 5 -state 5 +State 5 - 1 exp: exp . OP exp [$end, OP] + 1 exp: exp . OP exp 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP] OP shift, and go to state 4 @@ -246,7 +874,7 @@ AT_DATA([input.y], exp: exp OP exp | NUM; ]]) -AT_CHECK([bison -o input.c --report=all input.y]) +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y]) # Check the contents of the report. AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [], @@ -274,7 +902,7 @@ exp (6) on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1 -state 0 +State 0 0 $accept: . exp $end 1 exp: . exp OP exp @@ -285,14 +913,14 @@ state 0 exp go to state 2 -state 1 +State 1 2 exp: NUM . $default reduce using rule 2 (exp) -state 2 +State 2 0 $accept: exp . $end 1 exp: exp . OP exp @@ -301,14 +929,14 @@ state 2 OP shift, and go to state 4 -state 3 +State 3 0 $accept: exp $end . $default accept -state 4 +State 4 1 exp: . exp OP exp 1 | exp OP . exp @@ -319,9 +947,9 @@ state 4 exp go to state 5 -state 5 +State 5 - 1 exp: exp . OP exp [$end, OP] + 1 exp: exp . OP exp 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP] $default reduce using rule 1 (exp) @@ -332,6 +960,62 @@ state 5 AT_CLEANUP +## ---------------------- ## +## %precedence suffices. ## +## ---------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([%precedence suffices]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%precedence "then" +%precedence "else" +%% +stmt: + "if" cond "then" stmt +| "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt +| "stmt" +; + +cond: + "exp" +; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ------------------------------ ## +## %precedence does not suffice. ## +## ------------------------------ ## + +AT_SETUP([%precedence does not suffice]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%precedence "then" +%precedence "else" +%% +stmt: + "if" cond "then" stmt +| "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt +| "stmt" +; + +cond: + "exp" +| cond "then" cond +; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [], +[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr] +input.y:12.3-18: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + ## -------------------------------- ## ## Defaulted Conflicted Reduction. ## ## -------------------------------- ## @@ -342,13 +1026,13 @@ AT_CLEANUP # $end reduce using rule 3 (num) # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)] # -# But when `reduce 3' is the default action, we'd produce: +# But when 'reduce 3' is the default action, we'd produce: # # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)] # $default reduce using rule 3 (num) # # In this precise case (a reduction is masked by the default -# reduction), we make the `reduce 3' explicit: +# reduction), we make the 'reduce 3' explicit: # # $end reduce using rule 3 (num) # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)] @@ -368,19 +1052,19 @@ id : '0'; %% ]]) -AT_CHECK([bison -o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [], -[[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict -input.y:4.4-8: warning: rule never reduced because of conflicts: id: '0' +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [], +[[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr] +input.y:4.6-8: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] ]]) # Check the contents of the report. AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [], -[[Rules never reduced +[[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts 4 id: '0' -State 1 contains 1 reduce/reduce conflict. +State 1 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce Grammar @@ -414,7 +1098,7 @@ id (7) on left: 4, on right: 2 -state 0 +State 0 0 $accept: . exp $end 1 exp: . num @@ -429,7 +1113,7 @@ state 0 id go to state 4 -state 1 +State 1 3 num: '0' . [$end] 4 id: '0' . [$end] @@ -439,28 +1123,28 @@ state 1 $default reduce using rule 3 (num) -state 2 +State 2 0 $accept: exp . $end $end shift, and go to state 5 -state 3 +State 3 1 exp: num . $default reduce using rule 1 (exp) -state 4 +State 4 2 exp: id . $default reduce using rule 2 (exp) -state 5 +State 5 0 $accept: exp $end . @@ -485,10 +1169,9 @@ AT_DATA([input.y], exp: exp OP exp | NUM; ]]) -AT_CHECK([bison -o input.c input.y], 1, [], -[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict -input.y: expected 0 shift/reduce conflicts -]) +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [], +[[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected +]]) AT_CLEANUP @@ -505,7 +1188,7 @@ AT_DATA([input.y], exp: exp OP exp | NUM; ]]) -AT_CHECK([bison -o input.c input.y]) +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y]) AT_CLEANUP @@ -522,8 +1205,625 @@ AT_DATA([input.y], exp: exp OP exp | NUM; ]]) -AT_CHECK([bison -o input.c input.y], 1, [], -[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict -input.y: expected 2 shift/reduce conflicts -]) +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [], +[[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 2 expected +]]) +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ------------------------------- ## +## %expect with reduce conflicts. ## +## ------------------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([%expect with reduce conflicts]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%expect 0 +%% +program: a 'a' | a a; +a: 'a'; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [], +[[input.y: error: reduce/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected +]]) +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ------------------------- ## +## %prec with user strings. ## +## ------------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([%prec with user string]) + +AT_DATA([[input.y]], +[[%% +exp: + "foo" %prec "foo" +; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y]) +AT_CLEANUP + + +## -------------------------------- ## +## %no-default-prec without %prec. ## +## -------------------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec without %prec]) + +AT_DATA([[input.y]], +[[%left '+' +%left '*' + +%% + +%no-default-prec; + +e: e '+' e + | e '*' e + | '0' + ; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wall -o input.c input.y], 0, [], +[[input.y: warning: 4 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr] +input.y:1.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for '+' [-Wprecedence] +input.y:2.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for '*' [-Wprecedence] +]]) +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ----------------------------- ## +## %no-default-prec with %prec. ## +## ----------------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec with %prec]) + +AT_DATA([[input.y]], +[[%left '+' +%left '*' + +%% + +%no-default-prec; + +e: e '+' e %prec '+' + | e '*' e %prec '*' + | '0' + ; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y]) +AT_CLEANUP + + +## --------------- ## +## %default-prec. ## +## --------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([%default-prec]) + +AT_DATA([[input.y]], +[[%left '+' +%left '*' + +%% + +%default-prec; + +e: e '+' e + | e '*' e + | '0' + ; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y]) +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ---------------------------------------------- ## +## Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution. ## +## ---------------------------------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([[Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution]]) + +# If conflict resolution makes states unreachable, remove those states, report +# rules that are then unused, and don't report conflicts in those states. Test +# what happens when a nonterminal becomes useless as a result of state removal +# since that causes lalr.o's goto map to be rewritten. + +AT_DATA([[input.y]], +[[%output "input.c" +%left 'a' + +%% + +start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' ; + +/* S/R conflict resolved as reduce, so the state with item + * (resolved_conflict: 'a' . unreachable1) and all it transition successors are + * unreachable, and the associated production is useless. */ +resolved_conflict: + 'a' unreachable1 + | %prec 'a' + ; + +/* S/R conflict that need not be reported since it is unreachable because of + * the previous conflict resolution. Nonterminal unreachable1 and all its + * productions are useless. */ +unreachable1: + 'a' unreachable2 + | + ; + +/* Likewise for a R/R conflict and nonterminal unreachable2. */ +unreachable2: | ; + +/* Make sure remaining S/R and R/R conflicts are still reported correctly even + * when their states are renumbered due to state removal. */ +reported_conflicts: + 'a' + | 'a' + | + ; + +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input.y]], 0, [], +[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr] +input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr] +input.y:12.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +input.y:20.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +input.y:21.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +input.y:25.13: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +input.y:25.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +input.y:31.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +input.y:32.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +]]) + +AT_CHECK([[cat input.output]], 0, +[[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts + + 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1 + + 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2 + 5 | %empty + + 6 unreachable2: %empty + 7 | %empty + + 9 reported_conflicts: 'a' + 10 | %empty + + +State 4 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce +State 5 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce + + +Grammar + + 0 $accept: start $end + + 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' + + 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1 + 3 | %empty + + 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2 + 5 | %empty + + 6 unreachable2: %empty + 7 | %empty + + 8 reported_conflicts: 'a' + 9 | 'a' + 10 | %empty + + +Terminals, with rules where they appear + +$end (0) 0 +'a' (97) 1 2 4 8 9 +error (256) + + +Nonterminals, with rules where they appear + +$accept (4) + on left: 0 +start (5) + on left: 1, on right: 0 +resolved_conflict (6) + on left: 2 3, on right: 1 +unreachable1 (7) + on left: 4 5, on right: 2 +unreachable2 (8) + on left: 6 7, on right: 4 +reported_conflicts (9) + on left: 8 9 10, on right: 1 + + +State 0 + + 0 $accept: . start $end + 1 start: . resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' + 2 resolved_conflict: . 'a' unreachable1 + 3 | . %empty ['a'] + + $default reduce using rule 3 (resolved_conflict) + + start go to state 1 + resolved_conflict go to state 2 + + Conflict between rule 3 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a'). + + +State 1 + + 0 $accept: start . $end + + $end shift, and go to state 3 + + +State 2 + + 1 start: resolved_conflict . 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' + + 'a' shift, and go to state 4 + + +State 3 + + 0 $accept: start $end . + + $default accept + + +State 4 + + 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' . reported_conflicts 'a' + 8 reported_conflicts: . 'a' + 9 | . 'a' + 10 | . %empty ['a'] + + 'a' shift, and go to state 5 + + 'a' [reduce using rule 10 (reported_conflicts)] + + reported_conflicts go to state 6 + + +State 5 + + 8 reported_conflicts: 'a' . ['a'] + 9 | 'a' . ['a'] + + 'a' reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts) + 'a' [reduce using rule 9 (reported_conflicts)] + $default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts) + + +State 6 + + 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts . 'a' + + 'a' shift, and go to state 7 + + +State 7 + + 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' . + + $default reduce using rule 1 (start) +]]) + +AT_DATA([[input-keep.y]], +[[%define lr.keep-unreachable-state +]]) +AT_CHECK([[cat input.y >> input-keep.y]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([[input-keep.y]], 0, [], +[[input-keep.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr] +input-keep.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr] +input-keep.y:22.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +input-keep.y:26.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +input-keep.y:32.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +input-keep.y:33.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ------------------------------------------------------------ ## +## Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state. ## +## ------------------------------------------------------------ ## + +AT_SETUP([[Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state]]) + +# Used to lose earlier solved conflict messages even within a single S/R/R. + +AT_DATA([[input.y]], +[[%left 'a' +%right 'b' +%right 'c' +%right 'd' +%% +start: + 'a' + | empty_a 'a' + | 'b' + | empty_b 'b' + | 'c' + | empty_c1 'c' + | empty_c2 'c' + | empty_c3 'c' + ; +empty_a: %prec 'a' ; +empty_b: %prec 'b' ; +empty_c1: %prec 'c' ; +empty_c2: %prec 'c' ; +empty_c3: %prec 'd' ; +]]) +AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore]) +AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0, +[[State 0 + + 0 $accept: . start $end + 1 start: . 'a' + 2 | . empty_a 'a' + 3 | . 'b' + 4 | . empty_b 'b' + 5 | . 'c' + 6 | . empty_c1 'c' + 7 | . empty_c2 'c' + 8 | . empty_c3 'c' + 9 empty_a: . %empty ['a'] + 10 empty_b: . %empty [] + 11 empty_c1: . %empty [] + 12 empty_c2: . %empty [] + 13 empty_c3: . %empty ['c'] + + 'b' shift, and go to state 1 + + 'c' reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3) + $default reduce using rule 9 (empty_a) + + start go to state 2 + empty_a go to state 3 + empty_b go to state 4 + empty_c1 go to state 5 + empty_c2 go to state 6 + empty_c3 go to state 7 + + Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a'). + Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as shift (%right 'b'). + Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c'). + Conflict between rule 12 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c'). + Conflict between rule 13 and token 'c' resolved as reduce ('c' < 'd'). + + +State 1 +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ------------------------------------------------------------ ## +## %nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state. ## +## ------------------------------------------------------------ ## + +# Used to abort when trying to resolve conflicts as %nonassoc error actions for +# multiple reductions in a state. + +# For a %nonassoc error action token, used to print the first remaining +# reduction on that token without brackets. + +AT_SETUP([[%nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state]]) + +AT_DATA([[input.y]], +[[%nonassoc 'a' 'b' 'c' +%% +start: + 'a' + | empty_a 'a' + | 'b' + | empty_b 'b' + | 'c' + | empty_c1 'c' + | empty_c2 'c' + | empty_c3 'c' + ; +empty_a: %prec 'a' ; +empty_b: %prec 'b' ; +empty_c1: %prec 'c' ; +empty_c2: %prec 'c' ; +empty_c3: %prec 'c' ; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore]) +AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0, +[[State 0 + + 0 $accept: . start $end + 1 start: . 'a' + 2 | . empty_a 'a' + 3 | . 'b' + 4 | . empty_b 'b' + 5 | . 'c' + 6 | . empty_c1 'c' + 7 | . empty_c2 'c' + 8 | . empty_c3 'c' + 9 empty_a: . %empty [] + 10 empty_b: . %empty [] + 11 empty_c1: . %empty [] + 12 empty_c2: . %empty ['c'] + 13 empty_c3: . %empty ['c'] + + 'a' error (nonassociative) + 'b' error (nonassociative) + 'c' error (nonassociative) + + 'c' [reduce using rule 12 (empty_c2)] + 'c' [reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)] + + start go to state 1 + empty_a go to state 2 + empty_b go to state 3 + empty_c1 go to state 4 + empty_c2 go to state 5 + empty_c3 go to state 6 + + Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'a'). + Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'b'). + Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c'). + + +State 1 +]]) +AT_CLEANUP + + +## -------------------- ## +## %expect-rr non GLR. ## +## -------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([[%expect-rr non GLR]]) + +AT_DATA([[1.y]], +[[%expect-rr 0 +%% +exp: 'a' +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([[1.y]], [[0]], [], +[[1.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother] +]]) + +AT_DATA([[2.y]], +[[%expect-rr 1 +%% +exp: 'a' | 'a'; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([[2.y]], [[0]], [], +[[2.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother] +2.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr] +2.y:3.12-14: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother] +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ---------------------------------- ## +## -W versus %expect and %expect-rr. ## +## ---------------------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([[-W versus %expect and %expect-rr]]) + +AT_DATA([[sr-rr.y]], +[[%glr-parser +%% +start: 'a' | A 'a' | B 'a' ; +A: ; +B: ; +]]) +AT_DATA([[sr.y]], +[[%glr-parser +%% +start: 'a' | A 'a' ; +A: ; +]]) +AT_DATA([[rr.y]], +[[%glr-parser +%% +start: A | B ; +A: ; +B: ; +]]) + +AT_BISON_CHECK([[sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]], +[[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr] +sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr] +]]) +AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-sr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]], +[[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr] +]]) +AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-rr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]], +[[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr] +]]) + +[ +# This is piece of code is rather complex for a simple task: try every +# combinaison of (0 or 1 real SR) x (0 or 1 real RR) x (don't %expect +# or %expect 0, 1, or 2 SR) x (don't %expect-rr or %expect-rr 0, 1, or 2 +# RR). + +# Number and types of genuine conflicts in the grammar. +for gram in sr-rr sr rr; do + # Number of expected s/r conflicts. + for sr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do + # Number of expected r/r conflicts. + for rr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do + test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test -z "$rr_exp_i" && continue + + # Build grammar file. + sr_exp=0 + rr_exp=0 + file=$gram + directives= + if test -n "$sr_exp_i"; then + sr_exp=$sr_exp_i + file=$file-expect-$sr_exp + directives="%expect $sr_exp" + fi + if test -n "$rr_exp_i"; then + rr_exp=$rr_exp_i + file=$file-expect-rr-$rr_exp + directives="$directives %expect-rr $rr_exp" + fi + file=$file.y + echo "$directives" > $file + cat $gram.y >> $file + + # Number of found conflicts. + case $gram in + (sr) sr_count=1; rr_count=0;; + (rr) sr_count=0; rr_count=1;; + (sr-rr) sr_count=1; rr_count=1;; + esac + + # Update number of expected conflicts: if %expect is given then + # %expect-rr defaults to 0, and vice-versa. Leave empty if + # nothing expected. + case $sr_exp_i:$rr_exp_i in + ?:) rr_exp_i=0;; + :?) sr_exp_i=0;; + esac + + # Run tests. + if test $sr_count -eq $sr_exp && test $rr_count -eq $rr_exp; then + ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]])[ + ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]])[ + else + { + if test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test "$sr_count" -ne 0; then + echo "warning: $sr_count shift/reduce conflicts" + elif test "$sr_exp_i" -ne "$sr_count"; then + echo "error: shift/reduce conflicts: $sr_count found, $sr_exp_i expected" + fi + if test -z "$rr_exp_i" && test "$rr_count" -ne 0; then + echo "warning: $rr_count reduce/reduce conflicts" + elif test "$rr_exp_i" -ne "$rr_count"; then + echo "error: reduce/reduce conflicts: $rr_count found, $rr_exp_i expected" + fi + } | sed -e "s/^/$file: /" > experr + ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[ + ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[ + fi + done + done +done] + AT_CLEANUP