X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/bison.git/blobdiff_plain/643a5994714b21dfde1a44a52ccffd0a300e5131..671850a1c3e1aaac93a89fabc6d810be6a4a77fe:/tests/conflicts.at
diff --git a/tests/conflicts.at b/tests/conflicts.at
index 46add71b..819b992d 100644
--- a/tests/conflicts.at
+++ b/tests/conflicts.at
@@ -1,23 +1,264 @@
# Exercising Bison on conflicts. -*- Autotest -*-
-# Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
-# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
-# any later version.
+# Copyright (C) 2002-2005, 2007-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
-
+#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
-# 02111-1307, USA.
+# along with this program. If not, see .
AT_BANNER([[Conflicts.]])
+## ------------------------- ##
+## Token declaration order. ##
+## ------------------------- ##
+
+# This test checks that token are declared left to right when in a precedence
+# statement.
+
+AT_SETUP([Token declaration order])
+
+AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
+
+AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
+[[%code {
+ #include
+ ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[
+ ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[
+}
+%token A B C
+%token D
+%right E F G
+%right H I
+%right J
+%left K
+%left L M N
+%nonassoc O P Q
+%precedence R S T U
+%precedence V W
+%%
+exp: A
+%%
+]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
+]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE[
+int main (void)
+{
+ assert (A < B);
+ assert (B < C);
+ assert (C < D);
+ assert (D < E);
+ assert (E < F);
+ assert (F < G);
+ assert (G < H);
+ assert (H < I);
+ assert (I < J);
+ assert (J < K);
+ assert (K < L);
+ assert (L < M);
+ assert (M < N);
+ assert (N < O);
+ assert (O < P);
+ assert (P < Q);
+ assert (Q < R);
+ assert (R < S);
+ assert (S < T);
+ assert (T < U);
+ assert (U < V);
+ assert (V < W);
+ return 0;
+}
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+AT_COMPILE([input])
+
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input])
+
+AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## --------------------------------------------------- ##
+## Token declaration order: literals vs. identifiers. ##
+## --------------------------------------------------- ##
+
+# This test checks that when several tokens are declared by the same keyword,
+# some of them defined as a character ('a'), others as simple textual reference
+# (A), they are declared correctly left to right.
+# Previously, the following test would declare the states in the order 'o' 'p'
+# M N, instead of M N 'o' 'p'.
+
+AT_SETUP([Token declaration order: literals vs. identifiers])
+
+AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
+[[%token 'a' 'b' C D
+%token E F 'g' 'h'
+%right 'i' 'j' K L
+%right M N 'o' 'p'
+%%
+exp: 'a'
+ | 'b'
+ | C
+ | D
+ | E
+ | F
+ | 'g'
+ | 'h'
+ | 'i'
+ | 'j'
+ | K
+ | L
+ | M
+ | N
+ | 'o'
+ | 'p'
+;
+%%
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
+[[State 0
+
+ 0 $accept: . exp $end
+ 1 exp: . 'a'
+ 2 | . 'b'
+ 3 | . C
+ 4 | . D
+ 5 | . E
+ 6 | . F
+ 7 | . 'g'
+ 8 | . 'h'
+ 9 | . 'i'
+ 10 | . 'j'
+ 11 | . K
+ 12 | . L
+ 13 | . M
+ 14 | . N
+ 15 | . 'o'
+ 16 | . 'p'
+
+ 'a' shift, and go to state 1
+ 'b' shift, and go to state 2
+ C shift, and go to state 3
+ D shift, and go to state 4
+ E shift, and go to state 5
+ F shift, and go to state 6
+ 'g' shift, and go to state 7
+ 'h' shift, and go to state 8
+ 'i' shift, and go to state 9
+ 'j' shift, and go to state 10
+ K shift, and go to state 11
+ L shift, and go to state 12
+ M shift, and go to state 13
+ N shift, and go to state 14
+ 'o' shift, and go to state 15
+ 'p' shift, and go to state 16
+
+ exp go to state 17
+
+
+State 1
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------------------- ##
+## Useless associativity warning. ##
+## ------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([Useless associativity warning])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%token EQ "=" PL "+" ST "*" LP "("
+%nonassoc "="
+%left "+"
+%left "*"
+%precedence "("
+%%
+stmt:
+ exp
+| "var" "=" exp
+;
+
+exp:
+ exp "+" exp
+| exp "*" "num"
+| "(" exp ")"
+| "num"
+;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wprecedence input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y:2.1-9: warning: useless precedence and associativity for "=" [-Wprecedence]
+input.y:4.1-5: warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence [-Wprecedence]
+input.y:5.1-11: warning: useless precedence for "(" [-Wprecedence]
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ---------------------------- ##
+## Useless precedence warning. ##
+## ---------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([Useless precedence warning])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%token A B U V W X Y Z
+%precedence Z
+%left X
+%precedence Y
+%left W
+%right V
+%nonassoc U
+%%
+a: b
+ | a U b
+ | f
+;
+b: c
+ | b V c
+;
+c: d
+ | c W d
+;
+d: A
+ | d X d
+ | d Y A
+;
+f: B
+ | f Z B
+;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wprecedence -fcaret -o input.c input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y:7.1-9: warning: useless precedence and associativity for U [-Wprecedence]
+ %nonassoc U
+ ^^^^^^^^^
+input.y:6.1-6: warning: useless precedence and associativity for V [-Wprecedence]
+ %right V
+ ^^^^^^
+input.y:5.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for W [-Wprecedence]
+ %left W
+ ^^^^^
+input.y:2.1-11: warning: useless precedence for Z [-Wprecedence]
+ %precedence Z
+ ^^^^^^^^^^^
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
## ---------------- ##
## S/R in initial. ##
@@ -37,41 +278,45 @@ exp: e 'e';
e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-fcaret -o input.c input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+ e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
+ ^
+]])
AT_CLEANUP
+
## ------------------- ##
## %nonassoc and eof. ##
## ------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([%nonassoc and eof])
-AT_DATA([input.y],
+AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
+AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y],
[[
%{
#include
#include
#include
-#include
-#define YYERROR_VERBOSE 1
-#define yyerror(Msg) \
-do { \
- fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", Msg); \
- exit (1); \
-} while (0)
+#include
+#define YYERROR_VERBOSE 1
+]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
/* The current argument. */
-static const char *input = NULL;
+static const char *input;
static int
yylex (void)
{
- /* No token stands for end of file. */
- if (input && *input)
- return *input++;
- else
- return 0;
+ static size_t toknum;
+ assert (toknum <= strlen (input));
+ return input[toknum++];
}
%}
@@ -87,244 +332,820 @@ expr: expr '<' expr
int
main (int argc, const char *argv[])
{
- if (argc > 1)
- input = argv[1];
+ input = argc <= 1 ? "" : argv[1];
return yyparse ();
}
]])
+AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK],
+[AT_BISON_CHECK([$1[ -o input.c input.y]])
+AT_COMPILE([input])
-# Specify the output files to avoid problems on different file systems.
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c])
-AT_CHECK([$CC $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS input.c -o input], 0, [], [ignore])
+m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($2, [correct], [[, expecting $end]])])
-AT_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
-# FIXME: This is an actual bug, but a new one, in the sense that
-# no one has ever spotted it! The messages are *wrong*: there should
-# be nothing there, it should be expected eof.
-AT_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
- [parse error, unexpected '<', expecting '<' or '>'
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
+ [syntax error, unexpected '<'AT_EXPECTING
])
-AT_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
-AT_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
- [parse error, unexpected '>', expecting '<' or '>'
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
+ [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
])
-AT_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
- [parse error, unexpected '>', expecting '<' or '>'
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
+ [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
+])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])])
+
+# Expected token list is missing.
+AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([], [[incorrect]])
+
+# We must disable default reductions in inconsistent states in order to
+# have an explicit list of all expected tokens.
+AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reduction=consistent]],
+ [[correct]])
+
+# lr.default-reduction=consistent happens to work for this test case.
+# However, for other grammars, lookahead sets can be merged for
+# different left contexts, so it is still possible to have an incorrect
+# expected list. Canonical LR is almost a general solution (that is, it
+# can fail only when %nonassoc is used), so make sure it gives the same
+# result as above.
+AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr]], [[correct]])
+
+# parse.lac=full is a completely general solution that does not require
+# any of the above sacrifices. Of course, it does not extend the
+# language-recognition power of LALR to (IE)LR, but it does ensure that
+# the reported list of expected tokens matches what the given parser
+# would have accepted in place of the unexpected token.
+AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dparse.lac=full]], [[correct]])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+
+## ------------------------------------------- ##
+## parse.error=verbose and consistent errors. ##
+## ------------------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([[parse.error=verbose and consistent errors]])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK], [
+
+AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS([$1])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE],
+[AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[int yylex (yy::parser::semantic_type *lvalp)]],
+ [[int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp)]])])
+
+AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_DATA], [AT_DATA_GRAMMAR])([input.y],
+[AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
+
+%code imports {
+ import java.io.IOException;
+}]], [[
+
+%code {]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[
+ #include ]], [[
+ #include
+ #include
+ ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE])[
+ ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[;
+ #define USE(Var)
+}
+
+]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[%defines]], [[%define api.pure]])])[
+
+]$1[
+
+%define parse.error verbose
+
+%%
+
+]$2[
+
+]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[%code lexer {]], [[%%]])[
+
+/*--------.
+| yylex. |
+`--------*/]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
+
+public String input = "]$3[";
+public int index = 0;
+public int yylex ()
+{
+ if (index < input.length ())
+ return input.charAt (index++);
+ else
+ return 0;
+}
+public Object getLVal ()
+{
+ return new Integer(1);
+}]], [[
+
+]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[
+{
+ static char const *input = "]$3[";
+ *lvalp = 1;
+ return *input++;
+}]])[
+]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
+]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
+};
+
+%%]])[
+
+/*-------.
+| main. |
+`-------*/
+]AT_MAIN_DEFINE
+])
+
+AT_FULL_COMPILE([[input]])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($5, [ab], [[, expecting 'a' or 'b']],
+ $5, [a], [[, expecting 'a']],
+ $5, [b], [[, expecting 'b']])])
+
+AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_JAVA_PARSER_CHECK([[input]], [[0]]],
+ [AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]]]),
+[[]],
+[[syntax error, unexpected ]$4[]AT_EXPECTING[
+]])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])
+m4_popdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE])
+AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
+
])
+m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+[[%nonassoc 'a';
+
+start: consistent-error-on-a-a 'a' ;
+
+consistent-error-on-a-a:
+ 'a' default-reduction
+ | 'a' default-reduction 'a'
+ | 'a' shift
+ ;
+
+default-reduction: /*empty*/ ;
+shift: 'b' ;
+
+// Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
+// test case looks a little more realistic.
+start: 'b' consistent-error-on-a-a 'c' ;
+]])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], [[a]])
+
+# Unfortunately, no expected tokens are reported even though 'b' can be
+# accepted. Nevertheless, the main point of this test is to make sure
+# that at least the unexpected token is reported. In a previous version
+# of Bison, it wasn't reported because the error is detected in a
+# consistent state with an error action, and that case always triggered
+# the simple "syntax error" message.
+#
+# The point isn't to test IELR here, but state merging happens to
+# complicate this example.
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr]],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+ %glr-parser]],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+ %language "c++"]],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+ %language "java"]],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+ [[end of input]], [[none]])
+
+# Even canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+ %define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[ab]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+ %define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[ab]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[ab]])
+
+# Only LAC gets it right.
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr
+ %define parse.lac full]],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[b]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
+ %define parse.lac full]],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[b]])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR])
+m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+[[%nonassoc 'a';
+
+// If $$ = 0 here, then we know that the 'a' destructor is being invoked
+// incorrectly for the 'b' set in the semantic action below. All 'a'
+// tokens are returned by yylex, which sets $$ = 1.
+%destructor {
+ if (!$$)
+ fprintf (stderr, "Wrong destructor.\n");
+} 'a';
+
+// Rather than depend on an inconsistent state to induce reading a
+// lookahead as in the previous grammar, just assign the lookahead in a
+// semantic action. That lookahead isn't needed before either error
+// action is encountered. In a previous version of Bison, this was a
+// problem as it meant yychar was not translated into yytoken before
+// either error action. The second error action thus invoked a
+// destructor that it selected according to the incorrect yytoken. The
+// first error action would have reported an incorrect unexpected token
+// except that, due to the bug described in the previous grammar, the
+// unexpected token was not reported at all.
+start: error-reduce consistent-error 'a' { USE ($][3); } ;
+
+error-reduce:
+ 'a' 'a' consistent-reduction consistent-error 'a'
+ { USE (($][1, $][2, $][5)); }
+| 'a' error
+ { USE ($][1); }
+;
+
+consistent-reduction: /*empty*/ {
+ assert (yychar == YYEMPTY);
+ yylval = 0;
+ yychar = 'b';
+} ;
+
+consistent-error:
+ 'a' { USE ($][1); }
+| /*empty*/ %prec 'a'
+;
+
+// Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
+// test case looks a little more realistic.
+start: 'b' consistent-error 'b' ;
+]])
+m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], [[aa]])
+
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[]],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+ [['b']], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%glr-parser]],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+ [['b']], [[none]])
+# No C++ or Java test because yychar cannot be manipulated by users.
+
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+ [['b']], [[none]])
+
+# Canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[a]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[a]])
+
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full]],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+ [['b']], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full
+ %define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
+ [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
+ [[$end]], [[none]])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR])
+m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK])
+
AT_CLEANUP
+## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
+## LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states. ##
+## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
+
+# This test case demonstrates that, when %nonassoc is used, canonical
+# LR(1) parser table construction followed by conflict resolution
+# without further state splitting is not always sufficient to produce a
+# parser that can detect all syntax errors as soon as possible on one
+# token of lookahead. However, LAC solves the problem completely even
+# with minimal LR parser tables.
+
+AT_SETUP([[LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states]])
+AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
+AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
+[[%code {
+ #include
+ ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[
+ ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[
+}
+
+%error-verbose
+%nonassoc 'a'
+
+%%
+
+start:
+ 'a' problem 'a' // First context.
+| 'b' problem 'b' // Second context.
+| 'c' reduce-nonassoc // Just makes reduce-nonassoc useful.
+;
+
+problem:
+ look reduce-nonassoc
+| look 'a'
+| look 'b'
+;
+
+// For the state reached after shifting the 'a' in these productions,
+// lookahead sets are the same in both the first and second contexts.
+// Thus, canonical LR reuses the same state for both contexts. However,
+// the lookahead 'a' for the reduction "look: 'a'" later becomes an
+// error action only in the first context. In order to immediately
+// detect the syntax error on 'a' here for only the first context, this
+// canonical LR state would have to be split into two states, and the
+// 'a' lookahead would have to be removed from only one of the states.
+look:
+ 'a' // Reduction lookahead set is always ['a', 'b'].
+| 'a' 'b'
+| 'a' 'c' // 'c' is forgotten as an expected token.
+;
+
+reduce-nonassoc: %prec 'a';
+
+%%
+]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
+]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE(["aaa"])[
+]AT_MAIN_DEFINE
+])
+AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
+
+# Show canonical LR's failure.
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -o input.c input.y]],
+ [[0]], [[]],
+[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
+]])
+AT_COMPILE([[input]])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
+[[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b'
+]])
+
+# It's corrected by LAC.
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -Dparse.lac=full \
+ -o input.c input.y]], [[0]], [[]],
+[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
+]])
+AT_COMPILE([[input]])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
+[[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
+]])
+
+# IELR is sufficient when LAC is used.
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=ielr -Dparse.lac=full -o input.c input.y]],
+ [[0]], [[]],
+[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
+]])
+AT_COMPILE([[input]])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
+[[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
## ------------------------- ##
## Unresolved SR Conflicts. ##
## ------------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([Unresolved SR Conflicts])
+AT_KEYWORDS([report])
+
AT_DATA([input.y],
[[%token NUM OP
%%
exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c -v], 0, [],
-[input.y contains 1 shift/reduce conflict.
-])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
+]])
# Check the contents of the report.
AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
-[[State 5 contains 1 shift/reduce conflict.
+[[State 5 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
Grammar
- Number, Line, Rule
- 0 3 $axiom -> exp $
- 1 3 exp -> exp OP exp
- 2 3 exp -> NUM
+ 0 $accept: exp $end
+
+ 1 exp: exp OP exp
+ 2 | NUM
Terminals, with rules where they appear
-$ (0) 0
+$end (0) 0
error (256)
-NUM (257) 2
-OP (258) 1
+NUM (258) 2
+OP (259) 1
Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
-$axiom (5)
+$accept (5)
on left: 0
exp (6)
on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
-state 0
-
- $axiom -> . exp $ (rule 0)
-
- NUM shift, and go to state 1
-
- exp go to state 2
-
-
-
-state 1
+State 0
- exp -> NUM . (rule 2)
+ 0 $accept: . exp $end
+ 1 exp: . exp OP exp
+ 2 | . NUM
- $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
+ NUM shift, and go to state 1
+ exp go to state 2
-state 2
+State 1
- $axiom -> exp . $ (rule 0)
- exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1)
+ 2 exp: NUM .
- $ shift, and go to state 3
- OP shift, and go to state 4
+ $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
+State 2
-state 3
+ 0 $accept: exp . $end
+ 1 exp: exp . OP exp
- $axiom -> exp $ . (rule 0)
+ $end shift, and go to state 3
+ OP shift, and go to state 4
- $default accept
+State 3
-state 4
+ 0 $accept: exp $end .
- exp -> exp OP . exp (rule 1)
+ $default accept
- NUM shift, and go to state 1
- exp go to state 5
+State 4
+ 1 exp: . exp OP exp
+ 1 | exp OP . exp
+ 2 | . NUM
+ NUM shift, and go to state 1
-state 5
+ exp go to state 5
- exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1)
- exp -> exp OP exp . (rule 1)
- OP shift, and go to state 4
-
- OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
- $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
+State 5
+ 1 exp: exp . OP exp
+ 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
+ OP shift, and go to state 4
+ OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
+ $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
]])
AT_CLEANUP
-## --------------------- ##
-## Solved SR Conflicts. ##
-## --------------------- ##
-AT_SETUP([Solved SR Conflicts])
+## ----------------------- ##
+## Resolved SR Conflicts. ##
+## ----------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([Resolved SR Conflicts])
+
+AT_KEYWORDS([report])
AT_DATA([input.y],
[[%token NUM OP
-%right OP
+%left OP
%%
exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c -v], 0, [], [])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y])
# Check the contents of the report.
AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
-[[Conflict in state 5 between rule 2 and token OP resolved as shift.
+[[Grammar
+ 0 $accept: exp $end
-Grammar
-
- Number, Line, Rule
- 0 4 $axiom -> exp $
- 1 4 exp -> exp OP exp
- 2 4 exp -> NUM
+ 1 exp: exp OP exp
+ 2 | NUM
Terminals, with rules where they appear
-$ (0) 0
+$end (0) 0
error (256)
-NUM (257) 2
-OP (258) 1
+NUM (258) 2
+OP (259) 1
Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
-$axiom (5)
+$accept (5)
on left: 0
exp (6)
on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
-state 0
+State 0
- $axiom -> . exp $ (rule 0)
+ 0 $accept: . exp $end
+ 1 exp: . exp OP exp
+ 2 | . NUM
- NUM shift, and go to state 1
+ NUM shift, and go to state 1
- exp go to state 2
+ exp go to state 2
+State 1
-state 1
+ 2 exp: NUM .
- exp -> NUM . (rule 2)
+ $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
- $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
+State 2
+ 0 $accept: exp . $end
+ 1 exp: exp . OP exp
-state 2
+ $end shift, and go to state 3
+ OP shift, and go to state 4
- $axiom -> exp . $ (rule 0)
- exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1)
- $ shift, and go to state 3
- OP shift, and go to state 4
+State 3
+ 0 $accept: exp $end .
+ $default accept
-state 3
- $axiom -> exp $ . (rule 0)
+State 4
- $default accept
+ 1 exp: . exp OP exp
+ 1 | exp OP . exp
+ 2 | . NUM
+ NUM shift, and go to state 1
-state 4
+ exp go to state 5
- exp -> exp OP . exp (rule 1)
- NUM shift, and go to state 1
+State 5
- exp go to state 5
+ 1 exp: exp . OP exp
+ 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
+ $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
+ Conflict between rule 1 and token OP resolved as reduce (%left OP).
+]])
-state 5
+AT_CLEANUP
- exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1)
- exp -> exp OP exp . (rule 1)
- OP shift, and go to state 4
+## ---------------------- ##
+## %precedence suffices. ##
+## ---------------------- ##
- $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
+AT_SETUP([%precedence suffices])
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%precedence "then"
+%precedence "else"
+%%
+stmt:
+ "if" cond "then" stmt
+| "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
+| "stmt"
+;
+
+cond:
+ "exp"
+;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+## ------------------------------ ##
+## %precedence does not suffice. ##
+## ------------------------------ ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%precedence does not suffice])
+
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%precedence "then"
+%precedence "else"
+%%
+stmt:
+ "if" cond "then" stmt
+| "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
+| "stmt"
+;
+
+cond:
+ "exp"
+| cond "then" cond
+;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
+input.y:12.3-18: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## -------------------------------- ##
+## Defaulted Conflicted Reduction. ##
+## -------------------------------- ##
+
+# When there are RR conflicts, some rules are disabled. Usually it is
+# simply displayed as:
+#
+# $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
+# $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
+#
+# But when 'reduce 3' is the default action, we'd produce:
+#
+# $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
+# $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
+#
+# In this precise case (a reduction is masked by the default
+# reduction), we make the 'reduce 3' explicit:
+#
+# $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
+# $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
+# $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
+#
+# Maybe that's not the best display, but then, please propose something
+# else.
+
+AT_SETUP([Defaulted Conflicted Reduction])
+AT_KEYWORDS([report])
+
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%%
+exp: num | id;
+num: '0';
+id : '0';
+%%
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
+input.y:4.6-8: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+]])
+
+# Check the contents of the report.
+AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
+[[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
+
+ 4 id: '0'
+
+
+State 1 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
+
+
+Grammar
+
+ 0 $accept: exp $end
+
+ 1 exp: num
+ 2 | id
+
+ 3 num: '0'
+
+ 4 id: '0'
+
+
+Terminals, with rules where they appear
+
+$end (0) 0
+'0' (48) 3 4
+error (256)
+
+
+Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
+
+$accept (4)
+ on left: 0
+exp (5)
+ on left: 1 2, on right: 0
+num (6)
+ on left: 3, on right: 1
+id (7)
+ on left: 4, on right: 2
+
+
+State 0
+
+ 0 $accept: . exp $end
+ 1 exp: . num
+ 2 | . id
+ 3 num: . '0'
+ 4 id: . '0'
+
+ '0' shift, and go to state 1
+
+ exp go to state 2
+ num go to state 3
+ id go to state 4
+
+
+State 1
+
+ 3 num: '0' . [$end]
+ 4 id: '0' . [$end]
+
+ $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
+ $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
+ $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
+
+
+State 2
+
+ 0 $accept: exp . $end
+
+ $end shift, and go to state 5
+
+
+State 3
+
+ 1 exp: num .
+
+ $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
+
+
+State 4
+
+ 2 exp: id .
+
+ $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
+
+
+State 5
+
+ 0 $accept: exp $end .
+
+ $default accept
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -345,10 +1166,9 @@ AT_DATA([input.y],
exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c], 1, [],
-[input.y contains 1 shift/reduce conflict.
-expected 0 shift/reduce conflicts
-])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
+[[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
+]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -365,7 +1185,7 @@ AT_DATA([input.y],
exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c], 0)
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -382,8 +1202,625 @@ AT_DATA([input.y],
exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c], 1, [],
-[input.y contains 1 shift/reduce conflict.
-expected 2 shift/reduce conflicts
-])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
+[[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 2 expected
+]])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------------------- ##
+## %expect with reduce conflicts. ##
+## ------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%expect with reduce conflicts])
+
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%expect 0
+%%
+program: a 'a' | a a;
+a: 'a';
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
+[[input.y: error: reduce/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
+]])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------------- ##
+## %prec with user strings. ##
+## ------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%prec with user string])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%%
+exp:
+ "foo" %prec "foo"
+;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## -------------------------------- ##
+## %no-default-prec without %prec. ##
+## -------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec without %prec])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%left '+'
+%left '*'
+
+%%
+
+%no-default-prec;
+
+e: e '+' e
+ | e '*' e
+ | '0'
+ ;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wall -o input.c input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y: warning: 4 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
+input.y:1.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for '+' [-Wprecedence]
+input.y:2.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for '*' [-Wprecedence]
+]])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ----------------------------- ##
+## %no-default-prec with %prec. ##
+## ----------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec with %prec])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%left '+'
+%left '*'
+
+%%
+
+%no-default-prec;
+
+e: e '+' e %prec '+'
+ | e '*' e %prec '*'
+ | '0'
+ ;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## --------------- ##
+## %default-prec. ##
+## --------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%default-prec])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%left '+'
+%left '*'
+
+%%
+
+%default-prec;
+
+e: e '+' e
+ | e '*' e
+ | '0'
+ ;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ---------------------------------------------- ##
+## Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution. ##
+## ---------------------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([[Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution]])
+
+# If conflict resolution makes states unreachable, remove those states, report
+# rules that are then unused, and don't report conflicts in those states. Test
+# what happens when a nonterminal becomes useless as a result of state removal
+# since that causes lalr.o's goto map to be rewritten.
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%output "input.c"
+%left 'a'
+
+%%
+
+start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' ;
+
+/* S/R conflict resolved as reduce, so the state with item
+ * (resolved_conflict: 'a' . unreachable1) and all it transition successors are
+ * unreachable, and the associated production is useless. */
+resolved_conflict:
+ 'a' unreachable1
+ | %prec 'a'
+ ;
+
+/* S/R conflict that need not be reported since it is unreachable because of
+ * the previous conflict resolution. Nonterminal unreachable1 and all its
+ * productions are useless. */
+unreachable1:
+ 'a' unreachable2
+ |
+ ;
+
+/* Likewise for a R/R conflict and nonterminal unreachable2. */
+unreachable2: | ;
+
+/* Make sure remaining S/R and R/R conflicts are still reported correctly even
+ * when their states are renumbered due to state removal. */
+reported_conflicts:
+ 'a'
+ | 'a'
+ |
+ ;
+
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input.y]], 0, [],
+[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
+input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
+input.y:12.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+input.y:20.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+input.y:21.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+input.y:25.13: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+input.y:25.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+input.y:31.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+input.y:32.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+]])
+
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.output]], 0,
+[[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
+
+ 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
+
+ 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
+ 5 | %empty
+
+ 6 unreachable2: %empty
+ 7 | %empty
+
+ 9 reported_conflicts: 'a'
+ 10 | %empty
+
+
+State 4 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
+State 5 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
+
+
+Grammar
+
+ 0 $accept: start $end
+
+ 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
+
+ 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
+ 3 | %empty
+
+ 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
+ 5 | %empty
+
+ 6 unreachable2: %empty
+ 7 | %empty
+
+ 8 reported_conflicts: 'a'
+ 9 | 'a'
+ 10 | %empty
+
+
+Terminals, with rules where they appear
+
+$end (0) 0
+'a' (97) 1 2 4 8 9
+error (256)
+
+
+Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
+
+$accept (4)
+ on left: 0
+start (5)
+ on left: 1, on right: 0
+resolved_conflict (6)
+ on left: 2 3, on right: 1
+unreachable1 (7)
+ on left: 4 5, on right: 2
+unreachable2 (8)
+ on left: 6 7, on right: 4
+reported_conflicts (9)
+ on left: 8 9 10, on right: 1
+
+
+State 0
+
+ 0 $accept: . start $end
+ 1 start: . resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
+ 2 resolved_conflict: . 'a' unreachable1
+ 3 | . %empty ['a']
+
+ $default reduce using rule 3 (resolved_conflict)
+
+ start go to state 1
+ resolved_conflict go to state 2
+
+ Conflict between rule 3 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
+
+
+State 1
+
+ 0 $accept: start . $end
+
+ $end shift, and go to state 3
+
+
+State 2
+
+ 1 start: resolved_conflict . 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
+
+ 'a' shift, and go to state 4
+
+
+State 3
+
+ 0 $accept: start $end .
+
+ $default accept
+
+
+State 4
+
+ 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' . reported_conflicts 'a'
+ 8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
+ 9 | . 'a'
+ 10 | . %empty ['a']
+
+ 'a' shift, and go to state 5
+
+ 'a' [reduce using rule 10 (reported_conflicts)]
+
+ reported_conflicts go to state 6
+
+
+State 5
+
+ 8 reported_conflicts: 'a' . ['a']
+ 9 | 'a' . ['a']
+
+ 'a' reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
+ 'a' [reduce using rule 9 (reported_conflicts)]
+ $default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
+
+
+State 6
+
+ 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts . 'a'
+
+ 'a' shift, and go to state 7
+
+
+State 7
+
+ 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' .
+
+ $default reduce using rule 1 (start)
+]])
+
+AT_DATA([[input-keep.y]],
+[[%define lr.keep-unreachable-state
+]])
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.y >> input-keep.y]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[input-keep.y]], 0, [],
+[[input-keep.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
+input-keep.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
+input-keep.y:22.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+input-keep.y:26.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+input-keep.y:32.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+input-keep.y:33.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
+## Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state. ##
+## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
+
+AT_SETUP([[Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state]])
+
+# Used to lose earlier solved conflict messages even within a single S/R/R.
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%left 'a'
+%right 'b'
+%right 'c'
+%right 'd'
+%%
+start:
+ 'a'
+ | empty_a 'a'
+ | 'b'
+ | empty_b 'b'
+ | 'c'
+ | empty_c1 'c'
+ | empty_c2 'c'
+ | empty_c3 'c'
+ ;
+empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
+empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
+empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
+empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
+empty_c3: %prec 'd' ;
+]])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
+[[State 0
+
+ 0 $accept: . start $end
+ 1 start: . 'a'
+ 2 | . empty_a 'a'
+ 3 | . 'b'
+ 4 | . empty_b 'b'
+ 5 | . 'c'
+ 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
+ 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
+ 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
+ 9 empty_a: . %empty ['a']
+ 10 empty_b: . %empty []
+ 11 empty_c1: . %empty []
+ 12 empty_c2: . %empty []
+ 13 empty_c3: . %empty ['c']
+
+ 'b' shift, and go to state 1
+
+ 'c' reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)
+ $default reduce using rule 9 (empty_a)
+
+ start go to state 2
+ empty_a go to state 3
+ empty_b go to state 4
+ empty_c1 go to state 5
+ empty_c2 go to state 6
+ empty_c3 go to state 7
+
+ Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
+ Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as shift (%right 'b').
+ Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
+ Conflict between rule 12 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
+ Conflict between rule 13 and token 'c' resolved as reduce ('c' < 'd').
+
+
+State 1
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
+## %nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state. ##
+## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
+
+# Used to abort when trying to resolve conflicts as %nonassoc error actions for
+# multiple reductions in a state.
+
+# For a %nonassoc error action token, used to print the first remaining
+# reduction on that token without brackets.
+
+AT_SETUP([[%nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state]])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%nonassoc 'a' 'b' 'c'
+%%
+start:
+ 'a'
+ | empty_a 'a'
+ | 'b'
+ | empty_b 'b'
+ | 'c'
+ | empty_c1 'c'
+ | empty_c2 'c'
+ | empty_c3 'c'
+ ;
+empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
+empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
+empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
+empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
+empty_c3: %prec 'c' ;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
+[[State 0
+
+ 0 $accept: . start $end
+ 1 start: . 'a'
+ 2 | . empty_a 'a'
+ 3 | . 'b'
+ 4 | . empty_b 'b'
+ 5 | . 'c'
+ 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
+ 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
+ 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
+ 9 empty_a: . %empty []
+ 10 empty_b: . %empty []
+ 11 empty_c1: . %empty []
+ 12 empty_c2: . %empty ['c']
+ 13 empty_c3: . %empty ['c']
+
+ 'a' error (nonassociative)
+ 'b' error (nonassociative)
+ 'c' error (nonassociative)
+
+ 'c' [reduce using rule 12 (empty_c2)]
+ 'c' [reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)]
+
+ start go to state 1
+ empty_a go to state 2
+ empty_b go to state 3
+ empty_c1 go to state 4
+ empty_c2 go to state 5
+ empty_c3 go to state 6
+
+ Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'a').
+ Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'b').
+ Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c').
+
+
+State 1
+]])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## -------------------- ##
+## %expect-rr non GLR. ##
+## -------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([[%expect-rr non GLR]])
+
+AT_DATA([[1.y]],
+[[%expect-rr 0
+%%
+exp: 'a'
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[1.y]], [[0]], [],
+[[1.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother]
+]])
+
+AT_DATA([[2.y]],
+[[%expect-rr 1
+%%
+exp: 'a' | 'a';
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[2.y]], [[0]], [],
+[[2.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother]
+2.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
+2.y:3.12-14: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ---------------------------------- ##
+## -W versus %expect and %expect-rr. ##
+## ---------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([[-W versus %expect and %expect-rr]])
+
+AT_DATA([[sr-rr.y]],
+[[%glr-parser
+%%
+start: 'a' | A 'a' | B 'a' ;
+A: ;
+B: ;
+]])
+AT_DATA([[sr.y]],
+[[%glr-parser
+%%
+start: 'a' | A 'a' ;
+A: ;
+]])
+AT_DATA([[rr.y]],
+[[%glr-parser
+%%
+start: A | B ;
+A: ;
+B: ;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
+[[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
+sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
+]])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-sr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
+[[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
+]])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-rr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
+[[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
+]])
+
+[
+# This is piece of code is rather complex for a simple task: try every
+# combinaison of (0 or 1 real SR) x (0 or 1 real RR) x (don't %expect
+# or %expect 0, 1, or 2 SR) x (don't %expect-rr or %expect-rr 0, 1, or 2
+# RR).
+
+# Number and types of genuine conflicts in the grammar.
+for gram in sr-rr sr rr; do
+ # Number of expected s/r conflicts.
+ for sr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
+ # Number of expected r/r conflicts.
+ for rr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
+ test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test -z "$rr_exp_i" && continue
+
+ # Build grammar file.
+ sr_exp=0
+ rr_exp=0
+ file=$gram
+ directives=
+ if test -n "$sr_exp_i"; then
+ sr_exp=$sr_exp_i
+ file=$file-expect-$sr_exp
+ directives="%expect $sr_exp"
+ fi
+ if test -n "$rr_exp_i"; then
+ rr_exp=$rr_exp_i
+ file=$file-expect-rr-$rr_exp
+ directives="$directives %expect-rr $rr_exp"
+ fi
+ file=$file.y
+ echo "$directives" > $file
+ cat $gram.y >> $file
+
+ # Number of found conflicts.
+ case $gram in
+ (sr) sr_count=1; rr_count=0;;
+ (rr) sr_count=0; rr_count=1;;
+ (sr-rr) sr_count=1; rr_count=1;;
+ esac
+
+ # Update number of expected conflicts: if %expect is given then
+ # %expect-rr defaults to 0, and vice-versa. Leave empty if
+ # nothing expected.
+ case $sr_exp_i:$rr_exp_i in
+ ?:) rr_exp_i=0;;
+ :?) sr_exp_i=0;;
+ esac
+
+ # Run tests.
+ if test $sr_count -eq $sr_exp && test $rr_count -eq $rr_exp; then
+ ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]])[
+ ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]])[
+ else
+ {
+ if test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test "$sr_count" -ne 0; then
+ echo "warning: $sr_count shift/reduce conflicts"
+ elif test "$sr_exp_i" -ne "$sr_count"; then
+ echo "error: shift/reduce conflicts: $sr_count found, $sr_exp_i expected"
+ fi
+ if test -z "$rr_exp_i" && test "$rr_count" -ne 0; then
+ echo "warning: $rr_count reduce/reduce conflicts"
+ elif test "$rr_exp_i" -ne "$rr_count"; then
+ echo "error: reduce/reduce conflicts: $rr_count found, $rr_exp_i expected"
+ fi
+ } | sed -e "s/^/$file: /" > experr
+ ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
+ ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
+ fi
+ done
+ done
+done]
+
AT_CLEANUP