X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/bison.git/blobdiff_plain/3c31a486e76ca670cc2fbb9d452410cbf99258cd..326e5cf81eada2ebd9007fa5fe9903a27a8bd067:/tests/conflicts.at
diff --git a/tests/conflicts.at b/tests/conflicts.at
index 2c017876..705419b9 100644
--- a/tests/conflicts.at
+++ b/tests/conflicts.at
@@ -1,55 +1,78 @@
# Exercising Bison on conflicts. -*- Autotest -*-
-# Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
-# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
-# any later version.
+# Copyright (C) 2002-2005, 2007-2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
-
+#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
-# 02111-1307, USA.
+# along with this program. If not, see .
AT_BANNER([[Conflicts.]])
+## ---------------- ##
+## S/R in initial. ##
+## ---------------- ##
+
+# I once hacked Bison in such a way that it lost its reductions on the
+# initial state (because it was confusing it with the last state). It
+# took me a while to strip down my failures to this simple case. So
+# make sure it finds the s/r conflict below.
+
+AT_SETUP([S/R in initial])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%expect 1
+%%
+exp: e 'e';
+e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: e: /* empty */
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
## ------------------- ##
## %nonassoc and eof. ##
## ------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([%nonassoc and eof])
-AT_DATA([input.y],
+AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y],
[[
%{
#include
#include
#include
-#include
+
#define YYERROR_VERBOSE 1
-#define yyerror(Msg) \
-do { \
- fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", Msg); \
- exit (1); \
-} while (0)
+static void
+yyerror (const char *msg)
+{
+ fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", msg);
+}
/* The current argument. */
-static const char *input = NULL;
+static const char *input;
static int
yylex (void)
{
- /* No token stands for end of file. */
- if (input && *input)
- return *input++;
- else
- return 0;
+ static size_t toknum;
+ if (! (toknum <= strlen (input)))
+ abort ();
+ return input[toknum++];
}
%}
@@ -65,77 +88,222 @@ expr: expr '<' expr
int
main (int argc, const char *argv[])
{
- if (argc > 1)
- input = argv[1];
+ input = argc <= 1 ? "" : argv[1];
return yyparse ();
}
]])
# Specify the output files to avoid problems on different file systems.
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c])
-AT_CHECK([$CC $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS input.c -o input], 0, [], [ignore])
-
-AT_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
-# FIXME: This is an actual bug, but a new one, in the sense that
-# no one has ever spotted it! The messages are *wrong*: there should
-# be nothing there, it should be expected eof.
-AT_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
- [parse error, unexpected '<', expecting '<' or '>'
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+AT_COMPILE([input])
+
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
+ [syntax error, unexpected '<'
+])
+
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
+ [syntax error, unexpected '>'
])
-AT_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
-AT_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
- [parse error, unexpected '>', expecting '<' or '>'
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
+ [syntax error, unexpected '>'
])
-AT_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
- [parse error, unexpected '>', expecting '<' or '>'
+# We must disable default reductions in inconsistent states in order to
+# have an explicit list of all expected tokens. (However, unless we use
+# canonical LR, lookahead sets are merged for different left contexts,
+# so it is still possible to have extra incorrect tokens in the expected
+# list. That just doesn't happen to be a problem for this test case.)
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-Dlr.default-reductions=consistent -o input.c input.y])
+AT_COMPILE([input])
+
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
+ [syntax error, unexpected '<', expecting $end
+])
+
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
+ [syntax error, unexpected '>', expecting $end
+])
+
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
+ [syntax error, unexpected '>', expecting $end
])
AT_CLEANUP
+## ------------------------------------------- ##
+## parse.error=verbose and consistent errors. ##
+## ------------------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([[parse.error=verbose and consistent errors]])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK], [
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([$1[ -o input.c input.y]])
+AT_COMPILE([[input]])
+
+m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($3, [ab], [[, expecting 'a' or 'b']],
+ $3, [a], [[, expecting 'a']],
+ $3, [b], [[, expecting 'b']])])
+
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [],
+[[syntax error, unexpected ]$2[]AT_EXPECTING[
+]])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])
+
+])
+
+AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y],
+[[%code {
+ #include
+ #include
+ int yylex (void);
+ void yyerror (char const *);
+ #define USE(Var)
+}
+
+%define parse.error verbose
+
+// The point isn't to test IELR here, but state merging happens to
+// complicate the example.
+%define lr.type ielr
+
+%nonassoc 'a'
+
+// If yylval=0 here, then we know that the 'a' destructor is being
+// invoked incorrectly for the 'b' set in the semantic action below.
+// All 'a' tokens are returned by yylex, which sets yylval=1.
+%destructor {
+ if (!$$)
+ fprintf (stderr, "Wrong destructor.\n");
+} 'a'
+
+%%
+
+// The lookahead assigned by the semantic action isn't needed before
+// either error action is encountered. In a previous version of Bison,
+// this was a problem as it meant yychar was not translated into yytoken
+// before either error action. The second error action thus invoked a
+// destructor that it selected according to the incorrect yytoken. The
+// first error action would have reported an incorrect unexpected token
+// except that, due to another bug, the unexpected token is not reported
+// at all because the error action is the default action in a consistent
+// state. That bug still needs to be fixed.
+start: error-reduce consistent-error 'a' { USE ($3); } ;
+
+error-reduce:
+ 'a' 'a' consistent-reduction consistent-error 'a'
+ { USE (($1, $2, $5)); }
+| 'a' error
+ { USE ($1); }
+;
+
+consistent-reduction: /*empty*/ {
+ assert (yychar == YYEMPTY);
+ yylval = 0;
+ yychar = 'b';
+} ;
+
+consistent-error:
+ 'a' { USE ($1); }
+| /*empty*/ %prec 'a'
+;
+
+// Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
+// test case looks a little more realistic.
+start: 'b' consistent-error 'b' ;
+
+%%
+
+int
+yylex (void)
+{
+ static char const *input = "aa";
+ yylval = 1;
+ return *input++;
+}
+
+void
+yyerror (char const *msg)
+{
+ fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", msg);
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ return yyparse ();
+}
+]])
+
+# See comments in grammar for why this test doesn't succeed.
+AT_XFAIL_IF([[:]])
+
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([], [['b']], [[none]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reductions=consistent]],
+ [['b']], [[none]])
+
+# Canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reductions=accepting]],
+ [[$end]], [[a]])
+AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[-Flr.type=canonical-lr]], [[$end]], [[a]])
+
+m4_popdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+
## ------------------------- ##
## Unresolved SR Conflicts. ##
## ------------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([Unresolved SR Conflicts])
+AT_KEYWORDS([report])
+
AT_DATA([input.y],
[[%token NUM OP
%%
exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c -v], 0, [],
-[input.y contains 1 shift/reduce conflict.
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
+[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
])
# Check the contents of the report.
AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
-[[State 5 contains 1 shift/reduce conflict.
+[[State 5 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
Grammar
- Number, Line, Rule
- 0 3 $axiom -> exp $
- 1 3 exp -> exp OP exp
- 2 3 exp -> NUM
+ 0 $accept: exp $end
+
+ 1 exp: exp OP exp
+ 2 | NUM
Terminals, with rules where they appear
-$ (0) 0
+$end (0) 0
error (256)
-NUM (257) 2
-OP (258) 1
+NUM (258) 2
+OP (259) 1
Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
-$axiom (5)
+$accept (5)
on left: 0
exp (6)
on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
@@ -143,103 +311,102 @@ exp (6)
state 0
- NUM shift, and go to state 1
+ 0 $accept: . exp $end
+ 1 exp: . exp OP exp
+ 2 | . NUM
- exp go to state 2
+ NUM shift, and go to state 1
+ exp go to state 2
state 1
- exp -> NUM . (rule 2)
-
- $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
+ 2 exp: NUM .
+ $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
state 2
- $axiom -> exp . $ (rule 0)
- exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1)
-
- $ shift, and go to state 3
- OP shift, and go to state 4
+ 0 $accept: exp . $end
+ 1 exp: exp . OP exp
+ $end shift, and go to state 3
+ OP shift, and go to state 4
state 3
- $axiom -> exp $ . (rule 0)
+ 0 $accept: exp $end .
- $default accept
+ $default accept
state 4
- exp -> exp OP . exp (rule 1)
+ 1 exp: . exp OP exp
+ 1 | exp OP . exp
+ 2 | . NUM
- NUM shift, and go to state 1
-
- exp go to state 5
+ NUM shift, and go to state 1
+ exp go to state 5
state 5
- exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1)
- exp -> exp OP exp . (rule 1)
-
- OP shift, and go to state 4
-
- OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
- $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
-
+ 1 exp: exp . OP exp
+ 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
+ OP shift, and go to state 4
+ OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
+ $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
]])
AT_CLEANUP
-## --------------------- ##
-## Solved SR Conflicts. ##
-## --------------------- ##
-AT_SETUP([Solved SR Conflicts])
+## ----------------------- ##
+## Resolved SR Conflicts. ##
+## ----------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([Resolved SR Conflicts])
+
+AT_KEYWORDS([report])
AT_DATA([input.y],
[[%token NUM OP
-%right OP
+%left OP
%%
exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c -v], 0, [], [])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y])
# Check the contents of the report.
AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
-[[Conflict in state 5 between rule 2 and token OP resolved as shift.
-
+[[Grammar
-Grammar
+ 0 $accept: exp $end
- Number, Line, Rule
- 0 4 $axiom -> exp $
- 1 4 exp -> exp OP exp
- 2 4 exp -> NUM
+ 1 exp: exp OP exp
+ 2 | NUM
Terminals, with rules where they appear
-$ (0) 0
+$end (0) 0
error (256)
-NUM (257) 2
-OP (258) 1
+NUM (258) 2
+OP (259) 1
Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
-$axiom (5)
+$accept (5)
on left: 0
exp (6)
on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
@@ -247,58 +414,251 @@ exp (6)
state 0
- NUM shift, and go to state 1
+ 0 $accept: . exp $end
+ 1 exp: . exp OP exp
+ 2 | . NUM
- exp go to state 2
+ NUM shift, and go to state 1
+ exp go to state 2
state 1
- exp -> NUM . (rule 2)
-
- $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
+ 2 exp: NUM .
+ $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
state 2
- $axiom -> exp . $ (rule 0)
- exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1)
-
- $ shift, and go to state 3
- OP shift, and go to state 4
+ 0 $accept: exp . $end
+ 1 exp: exp . OP exp
+ $end shift, and go to state 3
+ OP shift, and go to state 4
state 3
- $axiom -> exp $ . (rule 0)
+ 0 $accept: exp $end .
- $default accept
+ $default accept
state 4
- exp -> exp OP . exp (rule 1)
+ 1 exp: . exp OP exp
+ 1 | exp OP . exp
+ 2 | . NUM
- NUM shift, and go to state 1
-
- exp go to state 5
+ NUM shift, and go to state 1
+ exp go to state 5
state 5
- exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1)
- exp -> exp OP exp . (rule 1)
+ 1 exp: exp . OP exp
+ 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
+
+ $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
+
+ Conflict between rule 1 and token OP resolved as reduce (%left OP).
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ---------------------- ##
+## %precedence suffices. ##
+## ---------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%precedence suffices])
+
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%precedence "then"
+%precedence "else"
+%%
+stmt:
+ "if" cond "then" stmt
+| "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
+| "stmt"
+;
+
+cond:
+ "exp"
+;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------------------ ##
+## %precedence does not suffice. ##
+## ------------------------------ ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%precedence does not suffice])
+
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%precedence "then"
+%precedence "else"
+%%
+stmt:
+ "if" cond "then" stmt
+| "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
+| "stmt"
+;
+
+cond:
+ "exp"
+| cond "then" cond
+;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
+input.y:12.3-18: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: cond: cond "then" cond
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## -------------------------------- ##
+## Defaulted Conflicted Reduction. ##
+## -------------------------------- ##
+
+# When there are RR conflicts, some rules are disabled. Usually it is
+# simply displayed as:
+#
+# $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
+# $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
+#
+# But when `reduce 3' is the default action, we'd produce:
+#
+# $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
+# $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
+#
+# In this precise case (a reduction is masked by the default
+# reduction), we make the `reduce 3' explicit:
+#
+# $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
+# $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
+# $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
+#
+# Maybe that's not the best display, but then, please propose something
+# else.
+
+AT_SETUP([Defaulted Conflicted Reduction])
+AT_KEYWORDS([report])
+
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%%
+exp: num | id;
+num: '0';
+id : '0';
+%%
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y: conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
+input.y:4.6-8: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: id: '0'
+]])
+
+# Check the contents of the report.
+AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
+[[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
+
+ 4 id: '0'
+
+
+State 1 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
+
- OP shift, and go to state 4
+Grammar
+
+ 0 $accept: exp $end
+
+ 1 exp: num
+ 2 | id
+
+ 3 num: '0'
+
+ 4 id: '0'
+
+
+Terminals, with rules where they appear
+
+$end (0) 0
+'0' (48) 3 4
+error (256)
+
+
+Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
+
+$accept (4)
+ on left: 0
+exp (5)
+ on left: 1 2, on right: 0
+num (6)
+ on left: 3, on right: 1
+id (7)
+ on left: 4, on right: 2
+
+
+state 0
+
+ 0 $accept: . exp $end
+ 1 exp: . num
+ 2 | . id
+ 3 num: . '0'
+ 4 id: . '0'
+
+ '0' shift, and go to state 1
+
+ exp go to state 2
+ num go to state 3
+ id go to state 4
- $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
+state 1
+
+ 3 num: '0' . [$end]
+ 4 id: '0' . [$end]
+
+ $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
+ $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
+ $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
+
+
+state 2
+
+ 0 $accept: exp . $end
+
+ $end shift, and go to state 5
+
+
+state 3
+
+ 1 exp: num .
+
+ $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
+
+
+state 4
+
+ 2 exp: id .
+
+ $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
+
+
+state 5
+ 0 $accept: exp $end .
+ $default accept
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -319,9 +679,9 @@ AT_DATA([input.y],
exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c], 1, [],
-[input.y contains 1 shift/reduce conflict.
-expected 0 shift/reduce conflicts
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
+[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
+input.y: expected 0 shift/reduce conflicts
])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -339,7 +699,7 @@ AT_DATA([input.y],
exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c], 0)
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -356,8 +716,479 @@ AT_DATA([input.y],
exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
]])
-AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c], 1, [],
-[input.y contains 1 shift/reduce conflict.
-expected 2 shift/reduce conflicts
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
+[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
+input.y: expected 2 shift/reduce conflicts
])
AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------------------- ##
+## %expect with reduce conflicts. ##
+## ------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%expect with reduce conflicts])
+
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%expect 0
+%%
+program: a 'a' | a a;
+a: 'a';
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
+[input.y: conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
+input.y: expected 0 reduce/reduce conflicts
+])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------------- ##
+## %prec with user strings. ##
+## ------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%prec with user string])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%%
+exp:
+ "foo" %prec "foo"
+;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## -------------------------------- ##
+## %no-default-prec without %prec. ##
+## -------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec without %prec])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%left '+'
+%left '*'
+
+%%
+
+%no-default-prec;
+
+e: e '+' e
+ | e '*' e
+ | '0'
+ ;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
+[[input.y: conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
+]])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ----------------------------- ##
+## %no-default-prec with %prec. ##
+## ----------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec with %prec])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%left '+'
+%left '*'
+
+%%
+
+%no-default-prec;
+
+e: e '+' e %prec '+'
+ | e '*' e %prec '*'
+ | '0'
+ ;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## --------------- ##
+## %default-prec. ##
+## --------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([%default-prec])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%left '+'
+%left '*'
+
+%%
+
+%default-prec;
+
+e: e '+' e
+ | e '*' e
+ | '0'
+ ;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ---------------------------------------------- ##
+## Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution. ##
+## ---------------------------------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([[Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution]])
+
+# If conflict resolution makes states unreachable, remove those states, report
+# rules that are then unused, and don't report conflicts in those states. Test
+# what happens when a nonterminal becomes useless as a result of state removal
+# since that causes lalr.o's goto map to be rewritten.
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%output "input.c"
+%left 'a'
+
+%%
+
+start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' ;
+
+/* S/R conflict resolved as reduce, so the state with item
+ * (resolved_conflict: 'a' . unreachable1) and all it transition successors are
+ * unreachable, and the associated production is useless. */
+resolved_conflict:
+ 'a' unreachable1
+ | %prec 'a'
+ ;
+
+/* S/R conflict that need not be reported since it is unreachable because of
+ * the previous conflict resolution. Nonterminal unreachable1 and all its
+ * productions are useless. */
+unreachable1:
+ 'a' unreachable2
+ |
+ ;
+
+/* Likewise for a R/R conflict and nonterminal unreachable2. */
+unreachable2: | ;
+
+/* Make sure remaining S/R and R/R conflicts are still reported correctly even
+ * when their states are renumbered due to state removal. */
+reported_conflicts:
+ 'a'
+ | 'a'
+ |
+ ;
+
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input.y]], 0, [],
+[[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce, 1 reduce/reduce
+input.y:12.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
+input.y:20.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
+input.y:21.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */
+input.y:25.13: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
+input.y:25.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
+input.y:31.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a'
+input.y:32.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */
+]])
+
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.output]], 0,
+[[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
+
+ 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
+
+ 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
+ 5 | /* empty */
+
+ 6 unreachable2: /* empty */
+ 7 | /* empty */
+
+ 9 reported_conflicts: 'a'
+ 10 | /* empty */
+
+
+State 4 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
+State 5 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
+
+
+Grammar
+
+ 0 $accept: start $end
+
+ 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
+
+ 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
+ 3 | /* empty */
+
+ 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
+ 5 | /* empty */
+
+ 6 unreachable2: /* empty */
+ 7 | /* empty */
+
+ 8 reported_conflicts: 'a'
+ 9 | 'a'
+ 10 | /* empty */
+
+
+Terminals, with rules where they appear
+
+$end (0) 0
+'a' (97) 1 2 4 8 9
+error (256)
+
+
+Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
+
+$accept (4)
+ on left: 0
+start (5)
+ on left: 1, on right: 0
+resolved_conflict (6)
+ on left: 2 3, on right: 1
+unreachable1 (7)
+ on left: 4 5, on right: 2
+unreachable2 (8)
+ on left: 6 7, on right: 4
+reported_conflicts (9)
+ on left: 8 9 10, on right: 1
+
+
+state 0
+
+ 0 $accept: . start $end
+ 1 start: . resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
+ 2 resolved_conflict: . 'a' unreachable1
+ 3 | . ['a']
+
+ $default reduce using rule 3 (resolved_conflict)
+
+ start go to state 1
+ resolved_conflict go to state 2
+
+ Conflict between rule 3 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
+
+
+state 1
+
+ 0 $accept: start . $end
+
+ $end shift, and go to state 3
+
+
+state 2
+
+ 1 start: resolved_conflict . 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
+
+ 'a' shift, and go to state 4
+
+
+state 3
+
+ 0 $accept: start $end .
+
+ $default accept
+
+
+state 4
+
+ 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' . reported_conflicts 'a'
+ 8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
+ 9 | . 'a'
+ 10 | . ['a']
+
+ 'a' shift, and go to state 5
+
+ 'a' [reduce using rule 10 (reported_conflicts)]
+
+ reported_conflicts go to state 6
+
+
+state 5
+
+ 8 reported_conflicts: 'a' . ['a']
+ 9 | 'a' . ['a']
+
+ 'a' reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
+ 'a' [reduce using rule 9 (reported_conflicts)]
+ $default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
+
+
+state 6
+
+ 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts . 'a'
+
+ 'a' shift, and go to state 7
+
+
+state 7
+
+ 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' .
+
+ $default reduce using rule 1 (start)
+]])
+
+AT_DATA([[input-keep.y]],
+[[%define lr.keep-unreachable-states
+]])
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.y >> input-keep.y]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[input-keep.y]], 0, [],
+[[input-keep.y: conflicts: 2 shift/reduce, 2 reduce/reduce
+input-keep.y:22.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */
+input-keep.y:26.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
+input-keep.y:32.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a'
+input-keep.y:33.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
+## Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state. ##
+## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
+
+AT_SETUP([[Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state]])
+
+# Used to lose earlier solved conflict messages even within a single S/R/R.
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%left 'a'
+%right 'b'
+%right 'c'
+%right 'd'
+%%
+start:
+ 'a'
+ | empty_a 'a'
+ | 'b'
+ | empty_b 'b'
+ | 'c'
+ | empty_c1 'c'
+ | empty_c2 'c'
+ | empty_c3 'c'
+ ;
+empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
+empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
+empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
+empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
+empty_c3: %prec 'd' ;
+]])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^state 0$/,/^state 1$/p']], 0,
+[[state 0
+
+ 0 $accept: . start $end
+ 1 start: . 'a'
+ 2 | . empty_a 'a'
+ 3 | . 'b'
+ 4 | . empty_b 'b'
+ 5 | . 'c'
+ 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
+ 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
+ 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
+ 9 empty_a: . ['a']
+ 10 empty_b: . []
+ 11 empty_c1: . []
+ 12 empty_c2: . []
+ 13 empty_c3: . ['c']
+
+ 'b' shift, and go to state 1
+
+ 'c' reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)
+ $default reduce using rule 9 (empty_a)
+
+ start go to state 2
+ empty_a go to state 3
+ empty_b go to state 4
+ empty_c1 go to state 5
+ empty_c2 go to state 6
+ empty_c3 go to state 7
+
+ Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
+ Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as shift (%right 'b').
+ Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
+ Conflict between rule 12 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
+ Conflict between rule 13 and token 'c' resolved as reduce ('c' < 'd').
+
+
+state 1
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
+## %nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state. ##
+## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
+
+# Used to abort when trying to resolve conflicts as %nonassoc error actions for
+# multiple reductions in a state.
+
+# For a %nonassoc error action token, used to print the first remaining
+# reduction on that token without brackets.
+
+AT_SETUP([[%nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state]])
+
+AT_DATA([[input.y]],
+[[%nonassoc 'a' 'b' 'c'
+%%
+start:
+ 'a'
+ | empty_a 'a'
+ | 'b'
+ | empty_b 'b'
+ | 'c'
+ | empty_c1 'c'
+ | empty_c2 'c'
+ | empty_c3 'c'
+ ;
+empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
+empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
+empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
+empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
+empty_c3: %prec 'c' ;
+]])
+
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^state 0$/,/^state 1$/p']], 0,
+[[state 0
+
+ 0 $accept: . start $end
+ 1 start: . 'a'
+ 2 | . empty_a 'a'
+ 3 | . 'b'
+ 4 | . empty_b 'b'
+ 5 | . 'c'
+ 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
+ 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
+ 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
+ 9 empty_a: . []
+ 10 empty_b: . []
+ 11 empty_c1: . []
+ 12 empty_c2: . ['c']
+ 13 empty_c3: . ['c']
+
+ 'a' error (nonassociative)
+ 'b' error (nonassociative)
+ 'c' error (nonassociative)
+
+ 'c' [reduce using rule 12 (empty_c2)]
+ 'c' [reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)]
+
+ start go to state 1
+ empty_a go to state 2
+ empty_b go to state 3
+ empty_c1 go to state 4
+ empty_c2 go to state 5
+ empty_c3 go to state 6
+
+ Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'a').
+ Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'b').
+ Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c').
+
+
+state 1
+]])
+AT_CLEANUP