X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/bison.git/blobdiff_plain/38eb7751e46092fedde6e25eb531c855635b1cfa..70afaf26037e919f6abf3904e43845d116899df3:/TODO

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 7d6f20ea..91845136 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -14,13 +14,6 @@ find something clean (not like YYLSP_NEEDED...).
 
 * Installation
 
-** Disable installation of yacc.
-
-Add an option to 'configure' that allows people to install Bison
-without installing the yacc wrapper script or the rarely-used little
-yacc library required by Posix.  This is for people who prefer some
-other implementation of yacc.
-
 * Documentation
 Before releasing, make sure the documentation ("Understanding your
 parser") refers to the current `output' format.
@@ -29,9 +22,6 @@ parser") refers to the current `output' format.
 ** vector
 Move to using vector, drop stack.hh.
 
-** I18n
-Catch up with yacc.c.
-
 * Report
 
 **  GLR
@@ -154,23 +144,6 @@ Are there any Texinfo standards for bibliography?
 * Java, Fortran, etc.
 
 
-** Java
-
-There are a couple of proposed outputs:
-
-- BYACC/J
-  which is based on Byacc.
-  <http://troi.lincom-asg.com/~rjamison/byacc/>
-
-- Bison Java
-  which is based on Bison.
-  <http://www.goice.co.jp/member/mo/hack-progs/bison-java.html>
-
-Sebastien Serrurier (serrur_s@epita.fr) is working on this: he is
-expected to contact the authors, design the output, and implement it
-into Bison.
-
-
 * Coding system independence
 Paul notes:
 
@@ -192,10 +165,9 @@ Paul notes:
 Show reductions.
 
 * Broken options ?
-** %no-parser
 ** %token-table
 ** Skeleton strategy
-Must we keep %no-parser?  %token-table?
+Must we keep %token-table?
 
 * src/print_graph.c
 Find the best graph parameters.
@@ -231,9 +203,6 @@ It is unfortunate that there is a total order for precedence.  It
 makes it impossible to have modular precedence information.  We should
 move to partial orders (sounds like series/parallel orders to me).
 
-This will be possible with a Bison parser for the grammar, as it will
-make it much easier to extend the grammar.
-
 ** Correlation b/w precedence and associativity
 Also, I fail to understand why we have to assign the same
 associativity to operators with the same precedence.  For instance,
@@ -318,22 +287,20 @@ Equip the parser with a means to create the (visual) parse tree.
 
 -----
 
-Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006 Free Software Foundation,
-Inc.
+Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2009 Free Software
+Foundation, Inc.
 
 This file is part of Bison, the GNU Compiler Compiler.
 
-Bison is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
 it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
-any later version.
+the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
+(at your option) any later version.
 
-Bison is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
 GNU General Public License for more details.
 
 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-along with Bison; see the file COPYING.  If not, write to
-the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
-Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
+along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.