X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/bison.git/blobdiff_plain/342b8b6e2156e923797745af2da2596e3086ccd5..213e640e1e78a687369fe4760b82385c602ca876:/tests/regression.at?ds=inline diff --git a/tests/regression.at b/tests/regression.at index 2be0ea00..9d55cf64 100644 --- a/tests/regression.at +++ b/tests/regression.at @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ AT_BANNER([[Regression tests.]]) AT_SETUP([Duplicate string]) -AT_DATA([duplicate.y], +AT_DATA([input.y], [[/* `Bison -v' used to dump core when two tokens are defined with the same string, as LE and GE below. */ @@ -38,63 +38,474 @@ exp: '(' exp ')' | NUM ; %% ]]) -AT_CHECK([bison -v duplicate.y -o duplicate.c], 0, ignore, ignore) +AT_CHECK([bison -v input.y -o input.c], 0, ignore, ignore) -AT_CLEANUP([duplicate.*]) +AT_CLEANUP +## ------------------------- ## +## Unresolved SR Conflicts. ## +## ------------------------- ## -## ---------------------- ## -## %union and --defines. ## -## ---------------------- ## +AT_SETUP([Unresolved SR Conflicts]) +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%token NUM OP +%% +exp: exp OP exp | NUM; +]]) -AT_SETUP([%union and --defines]) +AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c -v], 0, [], +[input.y contains 1 shift/reduce conflict. +]) + +# Check the contents of the report. +AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [], +[[State 5 contains 1 shift/reduce conflict. + + +Grammar + + Number, Line, Rule + 0 3 $axiom -> exp $ + 1 3 exp -> exp OP exp + 2 3 exp -> NUM + + +Terminals, with rules where they appear + +$ (0) 0 +error (256) +NUM (257) 2 +OP (258) 1 + + +Nonterminals, with rules where they appear + +$axiom (5) + on left: 0 +exp (6) + on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1 + + +state 0 + + NUM shift, and go to state 1 + + exp go to state 2 + + + +state 1 + + exp -> NUM . (rule 2) + + $default reduce using rule 2 (exp) + + + +state 2 + + $axiom -> exp . $ (rule 0) + exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1) + + $ shift, and go to state 3 + OP shift, and go to state 4 + + + +state 3 + + $axiom -> exp $ . (rule 0) + + $default accept + + +state 4 + + exp -> exp OP . exp (rule 1) + + NUM shift, and go to state 1 + + exp go to state 5 + + + +state 5 + + exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1) + exp -> exp OP exp . (rule 1) + + OP shift, and go to state 4 + + OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)] + $default reduce using rule 1 (exp) + + + +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + +## --------------------- ## +## Solved SR Conflicts. ## +## --------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([Solved SR Conflicts]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%token NUM OP +%right OP +%% +exp: exp OP exp | NUM; +]]) + +AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c -v], 0, [], []) + +# Check the contents of the report. +AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [], +[[Conflict in state 5 between rule 2 and token OP resolved as shift. + + +Grammar + + Number, Line, Rule + 0 4 $axiom -> exp $ + 1 4 exp -> exp OP exp + 2 4 exp -> NUM + + +Terminals, with rules where they appear + +$ (0) 0 +error (256) +NUM (257) 2 +OP (258) 1 + + +Nonterminals, with rules where they appear + +$axiom (5) + on left: 0 +exp (6) + on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1 + + +state 0 + + NUM shift, and go to state 1 + + exp go to state 2 + + + +state 1 + + exp -> NUM . (rule 2) + + $default reduce using rule 2 (exp) + + + +state 2 + + $axiom -> exp . $ (rule 0) + exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1) + + $ shift, and go to state 3 + OP shift, and go to state 4 + + + +state 3 + + $axiom -> exp $ . (rule 0) + + $default accept + + +state 4 + + exp -> exp OP . exp (rule 1) + + NUM shift, and go to state 1 + + exp go to state 5 + + + +state 5 + + exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1) + exp -> exp OP exp . (rule 1) + + OP shift, and go to state 4 + + $default reduce using rule 1 (exp) + + + +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + + + +## ------------------- ## +## Rule Line Numbers. ## +## ------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([Rule Line Numbers]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%% +expr: +'a' -AT_DATA([union.y], -[%union { - int integer; - char *string ; + } + +'b' + +{ + +} + +| + + +{ + + +} + +'c' + +{ + +} +]]) + +AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c -v], 0, [], []) + +# Check the contents of the report. +AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [], +[[Grammar + + Number, Line, Rule + 0 2 $axiom -> expr $ + 1 2 @1 -> /* empty */ + 2 2 expr -> 'a' @1 'b' + 3 15 @2 -> /* empty */ + 4 15 expr -> @2 'c' + + +Terminals, with rules where they appear + +$ (0) 0 +'a' (97) 2 +'b' (98) 2 +'c' (99) 4 +error (256) + + +Nonterminals, with rules where they appear + +$axiom (6) + on left: 0 +expr (7) + on left: 2 4, on right: 0 +@1 (8) + on left: 1, on right: 2 +@2 (9) + on left: 3, on right: 4 + + +state 0 + + 'a' shift, and go to state 1 + + $default reduce using rule 3 (@2) + + expr go to state 2 + @2 go to state 3 + + + +state 1 + + expr -> 'a' . @1 'b' (rule 2) + + $default reduce using rule 1 (@1) + + @1 go to state 4 + + + +state 2 + + $axiom -> expr . $ (rule 0) + + $ shift, and go to state 5 + + + +state 3 + + expr -> @2 . 'c' (rule 4) + + 'c' shift, and go to state 6 + + + +state 4 + + expr -> 'a' @1 . 'b' (rule 2) + + 'b' shift, and go to state 7 + + + +state 5 + + $axiom -> expr $ . (rule 0) + + $default accept + + +state 6 + + expr -> @2 'c' . (rule 4) + + $default reduce using rule 4 (expr) + + + +state 7 + + expr -> 'a' @1 'b' . (rule 2) + + $default reduce using rule 2 (expr) + + + +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + + +## -------------------- ## +## %expect not enough. ## +## -------------------- ## + +AT_SETUP([%expect not enough]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%token NUM OP +%expect 0 %% -exp: {}; +exp: exp OP exp | NUM; +]]) + +AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c], 1, [], +[input.y contains 1 shift/reduce conflict. +expected 0 shift/reduce conflicts ]) +AT_CLEANUP -AT_CHECK([bison --defines union.y]) -AT_CLEANUP([union.*]) +## --------------- ## +## %expect right. ## +## --------------- ## +AT_SETUP([%expect right]) -## --------------------------------------- ## -## Duplicate '/' in C comments in %union ## -## --------------------------------------- ## +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%token NUM OP +%expect 1 +%% +exp: exp OP exp | NUM; +]]) +AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c], 0) +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ------------------ ## +## %expect too much. ## +## ------------------ ## -AT_SETUP([%union and C comments]) +AT_SETUP([%expect too much]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%token NUM OP +%expect 2 +%% +exp: exp OP exp | NUM; +]]) + +AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c], 1, [], +[input.y contains 1 shift/reduce conflict. +expected 2 shift/reduce conflicts +]) +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ---------------------- ## +## Mixing %token styles. ## +## ---------------------- ## + + +AT_SETUP([Mixing %token styles]) + +# Taken from the documentation. +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%token OR "||" +%token LE 134 "<=" +%left OR "<=" +%% +exp: ; +%% +]]) + +AT_CHECK([bison -v input.y -o input.c], 0, ignore, ignore) + +AT_CLEANUP + + + +## ---------------------- ## +## %union and --defines. ## +## ---------------------- ## + + +AT_SETUP([%union and --defines]) -AT_DATA([union-comment.y], +AT_DATA([input.y], [%union { - /* The int. */ int integer; - /* The string. */ char *string ; + int integer; + char *string ; } %% exp: {}; ]) -AT_CHECK([bison union-comment.y]) -AT_CHECK([fgrep '//*' union-comment.tab.c], [1], []) +AT_CHECK([bison --defines input.y]) -AT_CLEANUP([union-comment.*]) +AT_CLEANUP -## --------------- ## -## invalid input. ## -## --------------- ## +## ----------------- ## +## Invalid input 1. ## +## ----------------- ## -AT_SETUP([Invalid input]) +AT_SETUP([Invalid input: 1]) AT_DATA([input.y], [[%% @@ -102,30 +513,316 @@ AT_DATA([input.y], ]]) AT_CHECK([bison input.y], [1], [], -[input.y:2: invalid input: `?' +[[input.y:2: invalid input: `?' input.y:3: fatal error: no rules in the input grammar -]) +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + +## ----------------- ## +## Invalid input 2. ## +## ----------------- ## + + +AT_SETUP([Invalid input: 2]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%% +default: 'a' } +]]) + +AT_CHECK([bison input.y], [1], [], +[[input.y:2: invalid input: `}' +]]) AT_CLEANUP + +## -------------------- ## +## Invalid %directive. ## +## -------------------- ## + + +AT_SETUP([Invalid %directive]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%invalid +]]) + +AT_CHECK([bison input.y], [1], [], +[[input.y:1: unrecognized: %invalid +input.y:1: Skipping to next % +input.y:2: fatal error: no input grammar +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP + + + ## --------------------- ## ## Invalid CPP headers. ## ## --------------------- ## -AT_SETUP([Invalid CPP headers]) +# AT_TEST_CPP_GUARD_H([INPUT-FILE-BASE) +# ------------------------------------- +m4_define([AT_TEST_CPP_GUARD_H], +[AT_SETUP([Invalid CPP guards: $1]) -mkdir input +# Possibly create inner directories. +dirname=`AS_DIRNAME([$1])` +AS_MKDIR_P([$dirname]) -AT_DATA([input/input.y], +AT_DATA([$1.y], [%% dummy: ]) -AT_CHECK([bison --defines input/input.y]) +AT_CHECK([bison --defines=$1.h $1.y]) + +# CPP should be happy with it. +AT_CHECK([$CC -E $1.h], 0, [ignore]) + +AT_CLEANUP +]) + +AT_TEST_CPP_GUARD_H([input/input]) +AT_TEST_CPP_GUARD_H([9foo]) + -AT_CHECK([sed 1q input/input.tab.h], 0, -[[#ifndef INPUT_INPUT_TAB_H + +## -------------- ## +## Web2c Report. ## +## -------------- ## + +# The generation of the reduction was once wrong in Bison, and made it +# miss some reductions. In the following test case, the reduction on +# `undef_id_tok' in state 1 was missing. This is stripped down from +# the actual web2c.y. + +AT_SETUP([Web2c Report]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%token undef_id_tok const_id_tok + +%start CONST_DEC_PART + +%% +CONST_DEC_PART: + CONST_DEC_LIST + ; + +CONST_DEC_LIST: + CONST_DEC + | CONST_DEC_LIST CONST_DEC + ; + +CONST_DEC: + { } undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok ';' + ; +%% + +]]) + +AT_CHECK([bison -v input.y]) + +AT_CHECK([sed -n 's/ *$//;/^$/!p' input.output], 0, +[[Grammar + Number, Line, Rule + 0 6 $axiom -> CONST_DEC_PART $ + 1 6 CONST_DEC_PART -> CONST_DEC_LIST + 2 10 CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC + 3 12 CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC_LIST CONST_DEC + 4 15 @1 -> /* empty */ + 5 15 CONST_DEC -> @1 undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok ';' +Terminals, with rules where they appear +$ (0) 0 +';' (59) 5 +'=' (61) 5 +error (256) +undef_id_tok (257) 5 +const_id_tok (258) 5 +Nonterminals, with rules where they appear +$axiom (7) + on left: 0 +CONST_DEC_PART (8) + on left: 1, on right: 0 +CONST_DEC_LIST (9) + on left: 2 3, on right: 1 3 +CONST_DEC (10) + on left: 5, on right: 2 3 +@1 (11) + on left: 4, on right: 5 +state 0 + $default reduce using rule 4 (@1) + CONST_DEC_PART go to state 1 + CONST_DEC_LIST go to state 2 + CONST_DEC go to state 3 + @1 go to state 4 +state 1 + $axiom -> CONST_DEC_PART . $ (rule 0) + $ shift, and go to state 5 +state 2 + CONST_DEC_PART -> CONST_DEC_LIST . (rule 1) + CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC_LIST . CONST_DEC (rule 3) + undef_id_tok reduce using rule 4 (@1) + $default reduce using rule 1 (CONST_DEC_PART) + CONST_DEC go to state 6 + @1 go to state 4 +state 3 + CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC . (rule 2) + $default reduce using rule 2 (CONST_DEC_LIST) +state 4 + CONST_DEC -> @1 . undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok ';' (rule 5) + undef_id_tok shift, and go to state 7 +state 5 + $axiom -> CONST_DEC_PART $ . (rule 0) + $default accept +state 6 + CONST_DEC_LIST -> CONST_DEC_LIST CONST_DEC . (rule 3) + $default reduce using rule 3 (CONST_DEC_LIST) +state 7 + CONST_DEC -> @1 undef_id_tok . '=' const_id_tok ';' (rule 5) + '=' shift, and go to state 8 +state 8 + CONST_DEC -> @1 undef_id_tok '=' . const_id_tok ';' (rule 5) + const_id_tok shift, and go to state 9 +state 9 + CONST_DEC -> @1 undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok . ';' (rule 5) + ';' shift, and go to state 10 +state 10 + CONST_DEC -> @1 undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok ';' . (rule 5) + $default reduce using rule 5 (CONST_DEC) ]]) -AT_CLEANUP(input) +AT_CLEANUP + + +## --------------- ## +## Web2c Actions. ## +## --------------- ## + +# The generation of the mapping `state -> action' was once wrong in +# extremely specific situations. web2c.y exhibits this situation. +# Below is a stripped version of the grammar. It looks like one can +# simplify it further, but just don't: it is tuned to exhibit a bug, +# which disapears when applying sane grammar transformations. +# +# It used to be wrong on yydefact only: +# +# static const short yydefact[] = +# { +# - 2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 2, 3, 2, 5, 4, +# + 2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 3, 2, 5, 4, +# 0, 0 +# }; +# +# but let's check all the tables. + + +AT_SETUP([Web2c Actions]) + +AT_DATA([input.y], +[[%% +statement: struct_stat; +struct_stat: /* empty. */ | if else; +if: "if" "const" "then" statement; +else: "else" statement; +%% +]]) + +AT_CHECK([bison -v input.y -o input.c]) + +# Check only the tables. We don't use --no-parser, because it is +# still to be implemented in the experimental branch of Bison. +AT_CHECK([[sed -n 's/ *$//;/^static const.*\[\] =/,/^}/p' input.c]], 0, +[[static const char yytranslate[] = +{ + 0, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, + 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, + 6 +}; +static const short yyprhs[] = +{ + 0, 0, 3, 5, 6, 9, 14 +}; +static const short yyrhs[] = +{ + 8, 0, -1, 9, -1, -1, 10, 11, -1, 3, + 4, 5, 8, -1, 6, 8, -1 +}; +static const short yyrline[] = +{ + 0, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5 +}; +static const char *const yytname[] = +{ + "$", "error", "$undefined.", "\"if\"", "\"const\"", "\"then\"", + "\"else\"", "$axiom", "statement", "struct_stat", "if", "else", NULL +}; +static const short yytoknum[] = +{ + 0, 256, 2, 257, 258, 259, 260, -1 +}; +static const short yyr1[] = +{ + 0, 7, 8, 9, 9, 10, 11 +}; +static const short yyr2[] = +{ + 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 4, 2 +}; +static const short yydefact[] = +{ + 3, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 3, 4, 3, + 6, 5 +}; +static const short yydefgoto[] = +{ + -1, 2, 3, 4, 8 +}; +static const short yypact[] = +{ + -2, -1, 4,-32768, 0, 2,-32768, -2,-32768, -2, + -32768,-32768 +}; +static const short yypgoto[] = +{ + -32768, -7,-32768,-32768,-32768 +}; +static const short yytable[] = +{ + 10, 1, 11, 5, 6, 0, 7, 9 +}; +static const short yycheck[] = +{ + 7, 3, 9, 4, 0, -1, 6, 5 +}; +]]) + +AT_CLEANUP