+Changes in version 2.3a+ (????-??-??):
+
+* The -g and --graph options now output graphs in Graphviz DOT format,
+ not VCG format.
+
+* The Yacc prologue alternatives from Bison 2.3a have been rewritten as the
+ following directives:
+
+ 1. %code {CODE}
+
+ Other than semantic actions, this is probably the most common place you
+ should write verbatim code for the parser implementation. For C/C++, it
+ replaces the traditional Yacc prologue, `%{CODE%}', for most purposes.
+ For Java, it inserts your CODE into the parser class. Compare with:
+
+ - `%{CODE%}' appearing after the first `%union {CODE}' in a C/C++
+ based grammar file. While Bison will continue to support `%{CODE%}'
+ for backward compatibility, `%code {CODE}' is cleaner as its
+ functionality does not depend on its position in the grammar file
+ relative to any `%union {CODE}'. Specifically, `%code {CODE}'
+ always inserts your CODE into the parser code file after the usual
+ contents of the parser header file.
+ - `%after-header {CODE}', which only Bison 2.3a supported.
+
+ 2. %requires {CODE}
+
+ This is the right place to write dependency code for externally exposed
+ definitions required by Bison. For C/C++, such exposed definitions are
+ those usually appearing in the parser header file. Thus, this is the
+ right place to define types referenced in `%union {CODE}' directives,
+ and it is the right place to override Bison's default YYSTYPE and
+ YYLTYPE definitions. For Java, this is the right place to write import
+ directives. Compare with:
+
+ - `%{CODE%}' appearing before the first `%union {CODE}' in a C/C++
+ based grammar file. Unlike `%{CODE%}', `%requires {CODE}' inserts
+ your CODE both into the parser code file and into the parser header
+ file since Bison's required definitions should depend on it in both
+ places.
+ - `%start-header {CODE}', which only Bison 2.3a supported.
+
+ 3. %provides {CODE}
+
+ This is the right place to write additional definitions you would like
+ Bison to expose externally. For C/C++, this directive inserts your CODE
+ both into the parser header file and into the parser code file after
+ Bison's required definitions. For Java, it inserts your CODE into the
+ parser java file after the parser class. Compare with:
+
+ - `%end-header {CODE}', which only Bison 2.3a supported.
+
+ 4. %code-top {CODE}
+
+ Occasionally for C/C++ it is desirable to insert code near the top of
+ the parser code file. For example:
+
+ %code-top {
+ #define _GNU_SOURCE
+ #include <stdio.h>
+ }
+
+ For Java, `%code-top {CODE}' is currently unused. Compare with:
+
+ - `%{CODE%}' appearing before the first `%union {CODE}' in a C/C++
+ based grammar file. `%code-top {CODE}' is cleaner as its
+ functionality does not depend on its position in the grammar file
+ relative to any `%union {CODE}'.
+ - `%before-header {CODE}', which only Bison 2.3a supported.
+
+ If you have multiple occurrences of any one of the above four directives,
+ Bison will concatenate the contents in the order they appear in the grammar
+ file.
+
+ Also see the new section `Prologue Alternatives' in the Bison manual.
+
+Changes in version 2.3a, 2006-09-13:
+
+* Instead of %union, you can define and use your own union type
+ YYSTYPE if your grammar contains at least one <type> tag.
+ Your YYSTYPE need not be a macro; it can be a typedef.
+ This change is for compatibility with other Yacc implementations,
+ and is required by POSIX.
+
+* Locations columns and lines start at 1.
+ In accordance with the GNU Coding Standards and Emacs.
+
+* You may now declare per-type and default %destructor's and %printer's:
+
+ For example:
+
+ %union { char *string; }
+ %token <string> STRING1
+ %token <string> STRING2
+ %type <string> string1
+ %type <string> string2
+ %union { char character; }
+ %token <character> CHR
+ %type <character> chr
+ %destructor { free ($$); } %symbol-default
+ %destructor { free ($$); printf ("%d", @$.first_line); } STRING1 string1
+ %destructor { } <character>
+
+ guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
+ semantic type tag other than `<character>', it passes its semantic value to
+ `free'. However, when the parser discards a `STRING1' or a `string1', it
+ also prints its line number to `stdout'. It performs only the second
+ `%destructor' in this case, so it invokes `free' only once.