]> git.saurik.com Git - bison.git/blob - tests/conflicts.at
c++: clean up the handling of empty symbols
[bison.git] / tests / conflicts.at
1 # Exercising Bison on conflicts. -*- Autotest -*-
2
3 # Copyright (C) 2002-2005, 2007-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4
5 # This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
6 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
7 # the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
8 # (at your option) any later version.
9 #
10 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
11 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
12 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
13 # GNU General Public License for more details.
14 #
15 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
16 # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
17
18 AT_BANNER([[Conflicts.]])
19
20 ## ------------------------- ##
21 ## Token declaration order. ##
22 ## ------------------------- ##
23
24 # This test checks that token are declared left to right when in a precedence
25 # statement.
26
27 AT_SETUP([Token declaration order])
28
29 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
30
31 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
32 [[%code {
33 #include <stdio.h>
34 ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[
35 ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[
36 }
37 %token A B C
38 %token D
39 %right E F G
40 %right H I
41 %right J
42 %left K
43 %left L M N
44 %nonassoc O P Q
45 %precedence R S T U
46 %precedence V W
47 %%
48 exp: A
49 %%
50 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
51 ]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE[
52 int main (void)
53 {
54 assert (A < B);
55 assert (B < C);
56 assert (C < D);
57 assert (D < E);
58 assert (E < F);
59 assert (F < G);
60 assert (G < H);
61 assert (H < I);
62 assert (I < J);
63 assert (J < K);
64 assert (K < L);
65 assert (L < M);
66 assert (M < N);
67 assert (N < O);
68 assert (O < P);
69 assert (P < Q);
70 assert (Q < R);
71 assert (R < S);
72 assert (S < T);
73 assert (T < U);
74 assert (U < V);
75 assert (V < W);
76 return 0;
77 }
78 ]])
79
80 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
81 AT_COMPILE([input])
82
83 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input])
84
85 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
86
87 AT_CLEANUP
88
89
90 ## --------------------------------------------------- ##
91 ## Token declaration order: literals vs. identifiers. ##
92 ## --------------------------------------------------- ##
93
94 # This test checks that when several tokens are declared by the same keyword,
95 # some of them defined as a character ('a'), others as simple textual reference
96 # (A), they are declared correctly left to right.
97 # Previously, the following test would declare the states in the order 'o' 'p'
98 # M N, instead of M N 'o' 'p'.
99
100 AT_SETUP([Token declaration order: literals vs. identifiers])
101
102 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
103 [[%token 'a' 'b' C D
104 %token E F 'g' 'h'
105 %right 'i' 'j' K L
106 %right M N 'o' 'p'
107 %%
108 exp: 'a'
109 | 'b'
110 | C
111 | D
112 | E
113 | F
114 | 'g'
115 | 'h'
116 | 'i'
117 | 'j'
118 | K
119 | L
120 | M
121 | N
122 | 'o'
123 | 'p'
124 ;
125 %%
126 ]])
127
128 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
129 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
130 [[State 0
131
132 0 $accept: . exp $end
133 1 exp: . 'a'
134 2 | . 'b'
135 3 | . C
136 4 | . D
137 5 | . E
138 6 | . F
139 7 | . 'g'
140 8 | . 'h'
141 9 | . 'i'
142 10 | . 'j'
143 11 | . K
144 12 | . L
145 13 | . M
146 14 | . N
147 15 | . 'o'
148 16 | . 'p'
149
150 'a' shift, and go to state 1
151 'b' shift, and go to state 2
152 C shift, and go to state 3
153 D shift, and go to state 4
154 E shift, and go to state 5
155 F shift, and go to state 6
156 'g' shift, and go to state 7
157 'h' shift, and go to state 8
158 'i' shift, and go to state 9
159 'j' shift, and go to state 10
160 K shift, and go to state 11
161 L shift, and go to state 12
162 M shift, and go to state 13
163 N shift, and go to state 14
164 'o' shift, and go to state 15
165 'p' shift, and go to state 16
166
167 exp go to state 17
168
169
170 State 1
171 ]])
172
173 AT_CLEANUP
174
175
176 ## ------------------------------- ##
177 ## Useless associativity warning. ##
178 ## ------------------------------- ##
179
180 AT_SETUP([Useless associativity warning])
181
182 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
183 [[%token EQ "=" PL "+" ST "*" LP "("
184 %nonassoc "="
185 %left "+"
186 %left "*"
187 %precedence "("
188 %%
189 stmt:
190 exp
191 | "var" "=" exp
192 ;
193
194 exp:
195 exp "+" exp
196 | exp "*" "num"
197 | "(" exp ")"
198 | "num"
199 ;
200 ]])
201
202 AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wprecedence input.y], 0, [],
203 [[input.y:2.1-9: warning: useless precedence and associativity for "=" [-Wprecedence]
204 input.y:4.1-5: warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence [-Wprecedence]
205 input.y:5.1-11: warning: useless precedence for "(" [-Wprecedence]
206 ]])
207
208 AT_CLEANUP
209
210
211 ## ---------------------------- ##
212 ## Useless precedence warning. ##
213 ## ---------------------------- ##
214
215 AT_SETUP([Useless precedence warning])
216
217 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
218 [[%token A B U V W X Y Z
219 %precedence Z
220 %left X
221 %precedence Y
222 %left W
223 %right V
224 %nonassoc U
225 %%
226 a: b
227 | a U b
228 | f
229 ;
230 b: c
231 | b V c
232 ;
233 c: d
234 | c W d
235 ;
236 d: A
237 | d X d
238 | d Y A
239 ;
240 f: B
241 | f Z B
242 ;
243 ]])
244
245 AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wprecedence -fcaret -o input.c input.y], 0, [],
246 [[input.y:7.1-9: warning: useless precedence and associativity for U [-Wprecedence]
247 %nonassoc U
248 ^^^^^^^^^
249 input.y:6.1-6: warning: useless precedence and associativity for V [-Wprecedence]
250 %right V
251 ^^^^^^
252 input.y:5.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for W [-Wprecedence]
253 %left W
254 ^^^^^
255 input.y:2.1-11: warning: useless precedence for Z [-Wprecedence]
256 %precedence Z
257 ^^^^^^^^^^^
258 ]])
259
260 AT_CLEANUP
261
262
263 ## ---------------- ##
264 ## S/R in initial. ##
265 ## ---------------- ##
266
267 # I once hacked Bison in such a way that it lost its reductions on the
268 # initial state (because it was confusing it with the last state). It
269 # took me a while to strip down my failures to this simple case. So
270 # make sure it finds the s/r conflict below.
271
272 AT_SETUP([S/R in initial])
273
274 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
275 [[%expect 1
276 %%
277 exp: e 'e';
278 e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
279 ]])
280
281 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
282 [[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
283 ]])
284
285 AT_BISON_CHECK([-fcaret -o input.c input.y], 0, [],
286 [[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
287 e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
288 ^
289 ]])
290
291 AT_CLEANUP
292
293
294 ## ------------------- ##
295 ## %nonassoc and eof. ##
296 ## ------------------- ##
297
298 AT_SETUP([%nonassoc and eof])
299
300 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
301 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y],
302 [[
303 %{
304 #include <stdio.h>
305 #include <stdlib.h>
306 #include <string.h>
307 #include <assert.h>
308
309 #define YYERROR_VERBOSE 1
310 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
311 /* The current argument. */
312 static const char *input;
313
314 static int
315 yylex (void)
316 {
317 static size_t toknum;
318 assert (toknum <= strlen (input));
319 return input[toknum++];
320 }
321
322 %}
323
324 %nonassoc '<' '>'
325
326 %%
327 expr: expr '<' expr
328 | expr '>' expr
329 | '0'
330 ;
331 %%
332 int
333 main (int argc, const char *argv[])
334 {
335 input = argc <= 1 ? "" : argv[1];
336 return yyparse ();
337 }
338 ]])
339 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
340
341 m4_pushdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK],
342 [AT_BISON_CHECK([$1[ -o input.c input.y]])
343 AT_COMPILE([input])
344
345 m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($2, [correct], [[, expecting $end]])])
346
347 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
348 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
349 [syntax error, unexpected '<'AT_EXPECTING
350 ])
351
352 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
353 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
354 [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
355 ])
356
357 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
358 [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
359 ])
360
361 m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])])
362
363 # Expected token list is missing.
364 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([], [[incorrect]])
365
366 # We must disable default reductions in inconsistent states in order to
367 # have an explicit list of all expected tokens.
368 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reduction=consistent]],
369 [[correct]])
370
371 # lr.default-reduction=consistent happens to work for this test case.
372 # However, for other grammars, lookahead sets can be merged for
373 # different left contexts, so it is still possible to have an incorrect
374 # expected list. Canonical LR is almost a general solution (that is, it
375 # can fail only when %nonassoc is used), so make sure it gives the same
376 # result as above.
377 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr]], [[correct]])
378
379 # parse.lac=full is a completely general solution that does not require
380 # any of the above sacrifices. Of course, it does not extend the
381 # language-recognition power of LALR to (IE)LR, but it does ensure that
382 # the reported list of expected tokens matches what the given parser
383 # would have accepted in place of the unexpected token.
384 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dparse.lac=full]], [[correct]])
385
386 m4_popdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK])
387
388 AT_CLEANUP
389
390
391
392 ## ------------------------------------------- ##
393 ## parse.error=verbose and consistent errors. ##
394 ## ------------------------------------------- ##
395
396 AT_SETUP([[parse.error=verbose and consistent errors]])
397
398 m4_pushdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK], [
399
400 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS([$1])
401
402 m4_pushdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE],
403 [AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[int yylex (yy::parser::semantic_type *lvalp)]],
404 [[int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp)]])])
405
406 AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_DATA], [AT_DATA_GRAMMAR])([input.y],
407 [AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
408
409 %code imports {
410 import java.io.IOException;
411 }]], [[
412
413 %code {]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[
414 #include <string>]], [[
415 #include <assert.h>
416 #include <stdio.h>
417 ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE])[
418 ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[;
419 #define USE(Var)
420 }
421
422 ]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[%defines]], [[%define api.pure]])])[
423
424 ]$1[
425
426 %define parse.error verbose
427
428 %%
429
430 ]$2[
431
432 ]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[%code lexer {]], [[%%]])[
433
434 /*--------.
435 | yylex. |
436 `--------*/]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
437
438 public String input = "]$3[";
439 public int index = 0;
440 public int yylex ()
441 {
442 if (index < input.length ())
443 return input.charAt (index++);
444 else
445 return 0;
446 }
447 public Object getLVal ()
448 {
449 return new Integer(1);
450 }]], [[
451
452 ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[
453 {
454 static char const *input = "]$3[";
455 *lvalp = 1;
456 return *input++;
457 }]])[
458 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
459 ]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
460 };
461
462 %%]])[
463
464 /*-------.
465 | main. |
466 `-------*/
467 ]AT_MAIN_DEFINE
468 ])
469
470 AT_FULL_COMPILE([[input]])
471
472 m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($5, [ab], [[, expecting 'a' or 'b']],
473 $5, [a], [[, expecting 'a']],
474 $5, [b], [[, expecting 'b']])])
475
476 AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_JAVA_PARSER_CHECK([[input]], [[0]]],
477 [AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]]]),
478 [[]],
479 [[syntax error, unexpected ]$4[]AT_EXPECTING[
480 ]])
481
482 m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])
483 m4_popdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE])
484 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
485
486 ])
487
488 m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
489 [[%nonassoc 'a';
490
491 start: consistent-error-on-a-a 'a' ;
492
493 consistent-error-on-a-a:
494 'a' default-reduction
495 | 'a' default-reduction 'a'
496 | 'a' shift
497 ;
498
499 default-reduction: /*empty*/ ;
500 shift: 'b' ;
501
502 // Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
503 // test case looks a little more realistic.
504 start: 'b' consistent-error-on-a-a 'c' ;
505 ]])
506
507 m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], [[a]])
508
509 # Unfortunately, no expected tokens are reported even though 'b' can be
510 # accepted. Nevertheless, the main point of this test is to make sure
511 # that at least the unexpected token is reported. In a previous version
512 # of Bison, it wasn't reported because the error is detected in a
513 # consistent state with an error action, and that case always triggered
514 # the simple "syntax error" message.
515 #
516 # The point isn't to test IELR here, but state merging happens to
517 # complicate this example.
518 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr]],
519 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
520 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
521 [[$end]], [[none]])
522 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
523 %glr-parser]],
524 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
525 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
526 [[$end]], [[none]])
527 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
528 %language "c++"]],
529 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
530 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
531 [[$end]], [[none]])
532 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
533 %language "java"]],
534 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
535 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
536 [[end of input]], [[none]])
537
538 # Even canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
539 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
540 %define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
541 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
542 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
543 [[$end]], [[ab]])
544 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
545 %define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
546 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
547 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
548 [[$end]], [[ab]])
549 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
550 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
551 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
552 [[$end]], [[ab]])
553
554 # Only LAC gets it right.
555 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr
556 %define parse.lac full]],
557 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
558 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
559 [[$end]], [[b]])
560 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
561 %define parse.lac full]],
562 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
563 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
564 [[$end]], [[b]])
565
566 m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR])
567 m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT])
568
569 m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
570 [[%nonassoc 'a';
571
572 // If $$ = 0 here, then we know that the 'a' destructor is being invoked
573 // incorrectly for the 'b' set in the semantic action below. All 'a'
574 // tokens are returned by yylex, which sets $$ = 1.
575 %destructor {
576 if (!$$)
577 fprintf (stderr, "Wrong destructor.\n");
578 } 'a';
579
580 // Rather than depend on an inconsistent state to induce reading a
581 // lookahead as in the previous grammar, just assign the lookahead in a
582 // semantic action. That lookahead isn't needed before either error
583 // action is encountered. In a previous version of Bison, this was a
584 // problem as it meant yychar was not translated into yytoken before
585 // either error action. The second error action thus invoked a
586 // destructor that it selected according to the incorrect yytoken. The
587 // first error action would have reported an incorrect unexpected token
588 // except that, due to the bug described in the previous grammar, the
589 // unexpected token was not reported at all.
590 start: error-reduce consistent-error 'a' { USE ($][3); } ;
591
592 error-reduce:
593 'a' 'a' consistent-reduction consistent-error 'a'
594 { USE (($][1, $][2, $][5)); }
595 | 'a' error
596 { USE ($][1); }
597 ;
598
599 consistent-reduction: /*empty*/ {
600 assert (yychar == YYEMPTY);
601 yylval = 0;
602 yychar = 'b';
603 } ;
604
605 consistent-error:
606 'a' { USE ($][1); }
607 | /*empty*/ %prec 'a'
608 ;
609
610 // Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
611 // test case looks a little more realistic.
612 start: 'b' consistent-error 'b' ;
613 ]])
614 m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], [[aa]])
615
616 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[]],
617 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
618 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
619 [['b']], [[none]])
620 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%glr-parser]],
621 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
622 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
623 [['b']], [[none]])
624 # No C++ or Java test because yychar cannot be manipulated by users.
625
626 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
627 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
628 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
629 [['b']], [[none]])
630
631 # Canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
632 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
633 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
634 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
635 [[$end]], [[a]])
636 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
637 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
638 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
639 [[$end]], [[a]])
640
641 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full]],
642 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
643 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
644 [['b']], [[none]])
645 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full
646 %define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
647 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
648 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
649 [[$end]], [[none]])
650
651 m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR])
652 m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT])
653
654 m4_popdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK])
655
656 AT_CLEANUP
657
658
659
660 ## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
661 ## LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states. ##
662 ## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
663
664 # This test case demonstrates that, when %nonassoc is used, canonical
665 # LR(1) parser table construction followed by conflict resolution
666 # without further state splitting is not always sufficient to produce a
667 # parser that can detect all syntax errors as soon as possible on one
668 # token of lookahead. However, LAC solves the problem completely even
669 # with minimal LR parser tables.
670
671 AT_SETUP([[LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states]])
672 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
673 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
674 [[%code {
675 #include <stdio.h>
676 ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[
677 ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[
678 }
679
680 %error-verbose
681 %nonassoc 'a'
682
683 %%
684
685 start:
686 'a' problem 'a' // First context.
687 | 'b' problem 'b' // Second context.
688 | 'c' reduce-nonassoc // Just makes reduce-nonassoc useful.
689 ;
690
691 problem:
692 look reduce-nonassoc
693 | look 'a'
694 | look 'b'
695 ;
696
697 // For the state reached after shifting the 'a' in these productions,
698 // lookahead sets are the same in both the first and second contexts.
699 // Thus, canonical LR reuses the same state for both contexts. However,
700 // the lookahead 'a' for the reduction "look: 'a'" later becomes an
701 // error action only in the first context. In order to immediately
702 // detect the syntax error on 'a' here for only the first context, this
703 // canonical LR state would have to be split into two states, and the
704 // 'a' lookahead would have to be removed from only one of the states.
705 look:
706 'a' // Reduction lookahead set is always ['a', 'b'].
707 | 'a' 'b'
708 | 'a' 'c' // 'c' is forgotten as an expected token.
709 ;
710
711 reduce-nonassoc: %prec 'a';
712
713 %%
714 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
715 ]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE(["aaa"])[
716 ]AT_MAIN_DEFINE
717 ])
718 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
719
720 # Show canonical LR's failure.
721 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -o input.c input.y]],
722 [[0]], [[]],
723 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
724 ]])
725 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
726 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
727 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b'
728 ]])
729
730 # It's corrected by LAC.
731 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -Dparse.lac=full \
732 -o input.c input.y]], [[0]], [[]],
733 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
734 ]])
735 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
736 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
737 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
738 ]])
739
740 # IELR is sufficient when LAC is used.
741 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=ielr -Dparse.lac=full -o input.c input.y]],
742 [[0]], [[]],
743 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
744 ]])
745 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
746 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
747 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
748 ]])
749
750 AT_CLEANUP
751
752 ## ------------------------- ##
753 ## Unresolved SR Conflicts. ##
754 ## ------------------------- ##
755
756 AT_SETUP([Unresolved SR Conflicts])
757
758 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
759
760 AT_DATA([input.y],
761 [[%token NUM OP
762 %%
763 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
764 ]])
765
766 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
767 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
768 ]])
769
770 # Check the contents of the report.
771 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
772 [[State 5 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
773
774
775 Grammar
776
777 0 $accept: exp $end
778
779 1 exp: exp OP exp
780 2 | NUM
781
782
783 Terminals, with rules where they appear
784
785 $end (0) 0
786 error (256)
787 NUM (258) 2
788 OP (259) 1
789
790
791 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
792
793 $accept (5)
794 on left: 0
795 exp (6)
796 on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
797
798
799 State 0
800
801 0 $accept: . exp $end
802 1 exp: . exp OP exp
803 2 | . NUM
804
805 NUM shift, and go to state 1
806
807 exp go to state 2
808
809
810 State 1
811
812 2 exp: NUM .
813
814 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
815
816
817 State 2
818
819 0 $accept: exp . $end
820 1 exp: exp . OP exp
821
822 $end shift, and go to state 3
823 OP shift, and go to state 4
824
825
826 State 3
827
828 0 $accept: exp $end .
829
830 $default accept
831
832
833 State 4
834
835 1 exp: . exp OP exp
836 1 | exp OP . exp
837 2 | . NUM
838
839 NUM shift, and go to state 1
840
841 exp go to state 5
842
843
844 State 5
845
846 1 exp: exp . OP exp
847 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
848
849 OP shift, and go to state 4
850
851 OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
852 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
853 ]])
854
855 AT_CLEANUP
856
857
858
859 ## ----------------------- ##
860 ## Resolved SR Conflicts. ##
861 ## ----------------------- ##
862
863 AT_SETUP([Resolved SR Conflicts])
864
865 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
866
867 AT_DATA([input.y],
868 [[%token NUM OP
869 %left OP
870 %%
871 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
872 ]])
873
874 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y])
875
876 # Check the contents of the report.
877 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
878 [[Grammar
879
880 0 $accept: exp $end
881
882 1 exp: exp OP exp
883 2 | NUM
884
885
886 Terminals, with rules where they appear
887
888 $end (0) 0
889 error (256)
890 NUM (258) 2
891 OP (259) 1
892
893
894 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
895
896 $accept (5)
897 on left: 0
898 exp (6)
899 on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
900
901
902 State 0
903
904 0 $accept: . exp $end
905 1 exp: . exp OP exp
906 2 | . NUM
907
908 NUM shift, and go to state 1
909
910 exp go to state 2
911
912
913 State 1
914
915 2 exp: NUM .
916
917 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
918
919
920 State 2
921
922 0 $accept: exp . $end
923 1 exp: exp . OP exp
924
925 $end shift, and go to state 3
926 OP shift, and go to state 4
927
928
929 State 3
930
931 0 $accept: exp $end .
932
933 $default accept
934
935
936 State 4
937
938 1 exp: . exp OP exp
939 1 | exp OP . exp
940 2 | . NUM
941
942 NUM shift, and go to state 1
943
944 exp go to state 5
945
946
947 State 5
948
949 1 exp: exp . OP exp
950 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
951
952 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
953
954 Conflict between rule 1 and token OP resolved as reduce (%left OP).
955 ]])
956
957 AT_CLEANUP
958
959
960 ## ---------------------- ##
961 ## %precedence suffices. ##
962 ## ---------------------- ##
963
964 AT_SETUP([%precedence suffices])
965
966 AT_DATA([input.y],
967 [[%precedence "then"
968 %precedence "else"
969 %%
970 stmt:
971 "if" cond "then" stmt
972 | "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
973 | "stmt"
974 ;
975
976 cond:
977 "exp"
978 ;
979 ]])
980
981 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
982
983 AT_CLEANUP
984
985
986 ## ------------------------------ ##
987 ## %precedence does not suffice. ##
988 ## ------------------------------ ##
989
990 AT_SETUP([%precedence does not suffice])
991
992 AT_DATA([input.y],
993 [[%precedence "then"
994 %precedence "else"
995 %%
996 stmt:
997 "if" cond "then" stmt
998 | "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
999 | "stmt"
1000 ;
1001
1002 cond:
1003 "exp"
1004 | cond "then" cond
1005 ;
1006 ]])
1007
1008 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
1009 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1010 input.y:12.3-18: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1011 ]])
1012
1013 AT_CLEANUP
1014
1015
1016 ## -------------------------------- ##
1017 ## Defaulted Conflicted Reduction. ##
1018 ## -------------------------------- ##
1019
1020 # When there are RR conflicts, some rules are disabled. Usually it is
1021 # simply displayed as:
1022 #
1023 # $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
1024 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
1025 #
1026 # But when 'reduce 3' is the default action, we'd produce:
1027 #
1028 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
1029 # $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
1030 #
1031 # In this precise case (a reduction is masked by the default
1032 # reduction), we make the 'reduce 3' explicit:
1033 #
1034 # $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
1035 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
1036 # $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
1037 #
1038 # Maybe that's not the best display, but then, please propose something
1039 # else.
1040
1041 AT_SETUP([Defaulted Conflicted Reduction])
1042 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
1043
1044 AT_DATA([input.y],
1045 [[%%
1046 exp: num | id;
1047 num: '0';
1048 id : '0';
1049 %%
1050 ]])
1051
1052 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
1053 [[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1054 input.y:4.6-8: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1055 ]])
1056
1057 # Check the contents of the report.
1058 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
1059 [[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
1060
1061 4 id: '0'
1062
1063
1064 State 1 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
1065
1066
1067 Grammar
1068
1069 0 $accept: exp $end
1070
1071 1 exp: num
1072 2 | id
1073
1074 3 num: '0'
1075
1076 4 id: '0'
1077
1078
1079 Terminals, with rules where they appear
1080
1081 $end (0) 0
1082 '0' (48) 3 4
1083 error (256)
1084
1085
1086 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
1087
1088 $accept (4)
1089 on left: 0
1090 exp (5)
1091 on left: 1 2, on right: 0
1092 num (6)
1093 on left: 3, on right: 1
1094 id (7)
1095 on left: 4, on right: 2
1096
1097
1098 State 0
1099
1100 0 $accept: . exp $end
1101 1 exp: . num
1102 2 | . id
1103 3 num: . '0'
1104 4 id: . '0'
1105
1106 '0' shift, and go to state 1
1107
1108 exp go to state 2
1109 num go to state 3
1110 id go to state 4
1111
1112
1113 State 1
1114
1115 3 num: '0' . [$end]
1116 4 id: '0' . [$end]
1117
1118 $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
1119 $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
1120 $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
1121
1122
1123 State 2
1124
1125 0 $accept: exp . $end
1126
1127 $end shift, and go to state 5
1128
1129
1130 State 3
1131
1132 1 exp: num .
1133
1134 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
1135
1136
1137 State 4
1138
1139 2 exp: id .
1140
1141 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
1142
1143
1144 State 5
1145
1146 0 $accept: exp $end .
1147
1148 $default accept
1149 ]])
1150
1151 AT_CLEANUP
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156 ## -------------------- ##
1157 ## %expect not enough. ##
1158 ## -------------------- ##
1159
1160 AT_SETUP([%expect not enough])
1161
1162 AT_DATA([input.y],
1163 [[%token NUM OP
1164 %expect 0
1165 %%
1166 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
1167 ]])
1168
1169 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
1170 [[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
1171 ]])
1172 AT_CLEANUP
1173
1174
1175 ## --------------- ##
1176 ## %expect right. ##
1177 ## --------------- ##
1178
1179 AT_SETUP([%expect right])
1180
1181 AT_DATA([input.y],
1182 [[%token NUM OP
1183 %expect 1
1184 %%
1185 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
1186 ]])
1187
1188 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1189 AT_CLEANUP
1190
1191
1192 ## ------------------ ##
1193 ## %expect too much. ##
1194 ## ------------------ ##
1195
1196 AT_SETUP([%expect too much])
1197
1198 AT_DATA([input.y],
1199 [[%token NUM OP
1200 %expect 2
1201 %%
1202 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
1203 ]])
1204
1205 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
1206 [[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 2 expected
1207 ]])
1208 AT_CLEANUP
1209
1210
1211 ## ------------------------------- ##
1212 ## %expect with reduce conflicts. ##
1213 ## ------------------------------- ##
1214
1215 AT_SETUP([%expect with reduce conflicts])
1216
1217 AT_DATA([input.y],
1218 [[%expect 0
1219 %%
1220 program: a 'a' | a a;
1221 a: 'a';
1222 ]])
1223
1224 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
1225 [[input.y: error: reduce/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
1226 ]])
1227 AT_CLEANUP
1228
1229
1230 ## ------------------------- ##
1231 ## %prec with user strings. ##
1232 ## ------------------------- ##
1233
1234 AT_SETUP([%prec with user string])
1235
1236 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1237 [[%%
1238 exp:
1239 "foo" %prec "foo"
1240 ;
1241 ]])
1242
1243 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1244 AT_CLEANUP
1245
1246
1247 ## -------------------------------- ##
1248 ## %no-default-prec without %prec. ##
1249 ## -------------------------------- ##
1250
1251 AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec without %prec])
1252
1253 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1254 [[%left '+'
1255 %left '*'
1256
1257 %%
1258
1259 %no-default-prec;
1260
1261 e: e '+' e
1262 | e '*' e
1263 | '0'
1264 ;
1265 ]])
1266
1267 AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wall -o input.c input.y], 0, [],
1268 [[input.y: warning: 4 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
1269 input.y:1.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for '+' [-Wprecedence]
1270 input.y:2.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for '*' [-Wprecedence]
1271 ]])
1272 AT_CLEANUP
1273
1274
1275 ## ----------------------------- ##
1276 ## %no-default-prec with %prec. ##
1277 ## ----------------------------- ##
1278
1279 AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec with %prec])
1280
1281 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1282 [[%left '+'
1283 %left '*'
1284
1285 %%
1286
1287 %no-default-prec;
1288
1289 e: e '+' e %prec '+'
1290 | e '*' e %prec '*'
1291 | '0'
1292 ;
1293 ]])
1294
1295 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1296 AT_CLEANUP
1297
1298
1299 ## --------------- ##
1300 ## %default-prec. ##
1301 ## --------------- ##
1302
1303 AT_SETUP([%default-prec])
1304
1305 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1306 [[%left '+'
1307 %left '*'
1308
1309 %%
1310
1311 %default-prec;
1312
1313 e: e '+' e
1314 | e '*' e
1315 | '0'
1316 ;
1317 ]])
1318
1319 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1320 AT_CLEANUP
1321
1322
1323 ## ---------------------------------------------- ##
1324 ## Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution. ##
1325 ## ---------------------------------------------- ##
1326
1327 AT_SETUP([[Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution]])
1328
1329 # If conflict resolution makes states unreachable, remove those states, report
1330 # rules that are then unused, and don't report conflicts in those states. Test
1331 # what happens when a nonterminal becomes useless as a result of state removal
1332 # since that causes lalr.o's goto map to be rewritten.
1333
1334 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1335 [[%output "input.c"
1336 %left 'a'
1337
1338 %%
1339
1340 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' ;
1341
1342 /* S/R conflict resolved as reduce, so the state with item
1343 * (resolved_conflict: 'a' . unreachable1) and all it transition successors are
1344 * unreachable, and the associated production is useless. */
1345 resolved_conflict:
1346 'a' unreachable1
1347 | %prec 'a'
1348 ;
1349
1350 /* S/R conflict that need not be reported since it is unreachable because of
1351 * the previous conflict resolution. Nonterminal unreachable1 and all its
1352 * productions are useless. */
1353 unreachable1:
1354 'a' unreachable2
1355 |
1356 ;
1357
1358 /* Likewise for a R/R conflict and nonterminal unreachable2. */
1359 unreachable2: | ;
1360
1361 /* Make sure remaining S/R and R/R conflicts are still reported correctly even
1362 * when their states are renumbered due to state removal. */
1363 reported_conflicts:
1364 'a'
1365 | 'a'
1366 |
1367 ;
1368
1369 ]])
1370
1371 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input.y]], 0, [],
1372 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1373 input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1374 input.y:12.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1375 input.y:20.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1376 input.y:21.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1377 input.y:25.13: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1378 input.y:25.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1379 input.y:31.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1380 input.y:32.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1381 ]])
1382
1383 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output]], 0,
1384 [[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
1385
1386 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
1387
1388 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
1389 5 | %empty
1390
1391 6 unreachable2: %empty
1392 7 | %empty
1393
1394 9 reported_conflicts: 'a'
1395 10 | %empty
1396
1397
1398 State 4 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
1399 State 5 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
1400
1401
1402 Grammar
1403
1404 0 $accept: start $end
1405
1406 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1407
1408 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
1409 3 | %empty
1410
1411 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
1412 5 | %empty
1413
1414 6 unreachable2: %empty
1415 7 | %empty
1416
1417 8 reported_conflicts: 'a'
1418 9 | 'a'
1419 10 | %empty
1420
1421
1422 Terminals, with rules where they appear
1423
1424 $end (0) 0
1425 'a' (97) 1 2 4 8 9
1426 error (256)
1427
1428
1429 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
1430
1431 $accept (4)
1432 on left: 0
1433 start (5)
1434 on left: 1, on right: 0
1435 resolved_conflict (6)
1436 on left: 2 3, on right: 1
1437 unreachable1 (7)
1438 on left: 4 5, on right: 2
1439 unreachable2 (8)
1440 on left: 6 7, on right: 4
1441 reported_conflicts (9)
1442 on left: 8 9 10, on right: 1
1443
1444
1445 State 0
1446
1447 0 $accept: . start $end
1448 1 start: . resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1449 2 resolved_conflict: . 'a' unreachable1
1450 3 | . %empty ['a']
1451
1452 $default reduce using rule 3 (resolved_conflict)
1453
1454 start go to state 1
1455 resolved_conflict go to state 2
1456
1457 Conflict between rule 3 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
1458
1459
1460 State 1
1461
1462 0 $accept: start . $end
1463
1464 $end shift, and go to state 3
1465
1466
1467 State 2
1468
1469 1 start: resolved_conflict . 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1470
1471 'a' shift, and go to state 4
1472
1473
1474 State 3
1475
1476 0 $accept: start $end .
1477
1478 $default accept
1479
1480
1481 State 4
1482
1483 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' . reported_conflicts 'a'
1484 8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
1485 9 | . 'a'
1486 10 | . %empty ['a']
1487
1488 'a' shift, and go to state 5
1489
1490 'a' [reduce using rule 10 (reported_conflicts)]
1491
1492 reported_conflicts go to state 6
1493
1494
1495 State 5
1496
1497 8 reported_conflicts: 'a' . ['a']
1498 9 | 'a' . ['a']
1499
1500 'a' reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
1501 'a' [reduce using rule 9 (reported_conflicts)]
1502 $default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
1503
1504
1505 State 6
1506
1507 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts . 'a'
1508
1509 'a' shift, and go to state 7
1510
1511
1512 State 7
1513
1514 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' .
1515
1516 $default reduce using rule 1 (start)
1517 ]])
1518
1519 AT_DATA([[input-keep.y]],
1520 [[%define lr.keep-unreachable-state
1521 ]])
1522 AT_CHECK([[cat input.y >> input-keep.y]])
1523
1524 AT_BISON_CHECK([[input-keep.y]], 0, [],
1525 [[input-keep.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
1526 input-keep.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
1527 input-keep.y:22.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1528 input-keep.y:26.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1529 input-keep.y:32.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1530 input-keep.y:33.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1531 ]])
1532
1533 AT_CLEANUP
1534
1535
1536 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1537 ## Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state. ##
1538 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1539
1540 AT_SETUP([[Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state]])
1541
1542 # Used to lose earlier solved conflict messages even within a single S/R/R.
1543
1544 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1545 [[%left 'a'
1546 %right 'b'
1547 %right 'c'
1548 %right 'd'
1549 %%
1550 start:
1551 'a'
1552 | empty_a 'a'
1553 | 'b'
1554 | empty_b 'b'
1555 | 'c'
1556 | empty_c1 'c'
1557 | empty_c2 'c'
1558 | empty_c3 'c'
1559 ;
1560 empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
1561 empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
1562 empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
1563 empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
1564 empty_c3: %prec 'd' ;
1565 ]])
1566 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
1567 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
1568 [[State 0
1569
1570 0 $accept: . start $end
1571 1 start: . 'a'
1572 2 | . empty_a 'a'
1573 3 | . 'b'
1574 4 | . empty_b 'b'
1575 5 | . 'c'
1576 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
1577 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
1578 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
1579 9 empty_a: . %empty ['a']
1580 10 empty_b: . %empty []
1581 11 empty_c1: . %empty []
1582 12 empty_c2: . %empty []
1583 13 empty_c3: . %empty ['c']
1584
1585 'b' shift, and go to state 1
1586
1587 'c' reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)
1588 $default reduce using rule 9 (empty_a)
1589
1590 start go to state 2
1591 empty_a go to state 3
1592 empty_b go to state 4
1593 empty_c1 go to state 5
1594 empty_c2 go to state 6
1595 empty_c3 go to state 7
1596
1597 Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
1598 Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as shift (%right 'b').
1599 Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
1600 Conflict between rule 12 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
1601 Conflict between rule 13 and token 'c' resolved as reduce ('c' < 'd').
1602
1603
1604 State 1
1605 ]])
1606
1607 AT_CLEANUP
1608
1609
1610 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1611 ## %nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state. ##
1612 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1613
1614 # Used to abort when trying to resolve conflicts as %nonassoc error actions for
1615 # multiple reductions in a state.
1616
1617 # For a %nonassoc error action token, used to print the first remaining
1618 # reduction on that token without brackets.
1619
1620 AT_SETUP([[%nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state]])
1621
1622 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1623 [[%nonassoc 'a' 'b' 'c'
1624 %%
1625 start:
1626 'a'
1627 | empty_a 'a'
1628 | 'b'
1629 | empty_b 'b'
1630 | 'c'
1631 | empty_c1 'c'
1632 | empty_c2 'c'
1633 | empty_c3 'c'
1634 ;
1635 empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
1636 empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
1637 empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
1638 empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
1639 empty_c3: %prec 'c' ;
1640 ]])
1641
1642 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
1643 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
1644 [[State 0
1645
1646 0 $accept: . start $end
1647 1 start: . 'a'
1648 2 | . empty_a 'a'
1649 3 | . 'b'
1650 4 | . empty_b 'b'
1651 5 | . 'c'
1652 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
1653 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
1654 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
1655 9 empty_a: . %empty []
1656 10 empty_b: . %empty []
1657 11 empty_c1: . %empty []
1658 12 empty_c2: . %empty ['c']
1659 13 empty_c3: . %empty ['c']
1660
1661 'a' error (nonassociative)
1662 'b' error (nonassociative)
1663 'c' error (nonassociative)
1664
1665 'c' [reduce using rule 12 (empty_c2)]
1666 'c' [reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)]
1667
1668 start go to state 1
1669 empty_a go to state 2
1670 empty_b go to state 3
1671 empty_c1 go to state 4
1672 empty_c2 go to state 5
1673 empty_c3 go to state 6
1674
1675 Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'a').
1676 Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'b').
1677 Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c').
1678
1679
1680 State 1
1681 ]])
1682 AT_CLEANUP
1683
1684
1685 ## -------------------- ##
1686 ## %expect-rr non GLR. ##
1687 ## -------------------- ##
1688
1689 AT_SETUP([[%expect-rr non GLR]])
1690
1691 AT_DATA([[1.y]],
1692 [[%expect-rr 0
1693 %%
1694 exp: 'a'
1695 ]])
1696
1697 AT_BISON_CHECK([[1.y]], [[0]], [],
1698 [[1.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother]
1699 ]])
1700
1701 AT_DATA([[2.y]],
1702 [[%expect-rr 1
1703 %%
1704 exp: 'a' | 'a';
1705 ]])
1706
1707 AT_BISON_CHECK([[2.y]], [[0]], [],
1708 [[2.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother]
1709 2.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1710 2.y:3.12-14: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1711 ]])
1712
1713 AT_CLEANUP
1714
1715
1716 ## ---------------------------------- ##
1717 ## -W versus %expect and %expect-rr. ##
1718 ## ---------------------------------- ##
1719
1720 AT_SETUP([[-W versus %expect and %expect-rr]])
1721
1722 AT_DATA([[sr-rr.y]],
1723 [[%glr-parser
1724 %%
1725 start: 'a' | A 'a' | B 'a' ;
1726 A: ;
1727 B: ;
1728 ]])
1729 AT_DATA([[sr.y]],
1730 [[%glr-parser
1731 %%
1732 start: 'a' | A 'a' ;
1733 A: ;
1734 ]])
1735 AT_DATA([[rr.y]],
1736 [[%glr-parser
1737 %%
1738 start: A | B ;
1739 A: ;
1740 B: ;
1741 ]])
1742
1743 AT_BISON_CHECK([[sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1744 [[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1745 sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1746 ]])
1747 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-sr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1748 [[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1749 ]])
1750 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-rr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1751 [[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1752 ]])
1753
1754 [
1755 # This is piece of code is rather complex for a simple task: try every
1756 # combinaison of (0 or 1 real SR) x (0 or 1 real RR) x (don't %expect
1757 # or %expect 0, 1, or 2 SR) x (don't %expect-rr or %expect-rr 0, 1, or 2
1758 # RR).
1759
1760 # Number and types of genuine conflicts in the grammar.
1761 for gram in sr-rr sr rr; do
1762 # Number of expected s/r conflicts.
1763 for sr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
1764 # Number of expected r/r conflicts.
1765 for rr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
1766 test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test -z "$rr_exp_i" && continue
1767
1768 # Build grammar file.
1769 sr_exp=0
1770 rr_exp=0
1771 file=$gram
1772 directives=
1773 if test -n "$sr_exp_i"; then
1774 sr_exp=$sr_exp_i
1775 file=$file-expect-$sr_exp
1776 directives="%expect $sr_exp"
1777 fi
1778 if test -n "$rr_exp_i"; then
1779 rr_exp=$rr_exp_i
1780 file=$file-expect-rr-$rr_exp
1781 directives="$directives %expect-rr $rr_exp"
1782 fi
1783 file=$file.y
1784 echo "$directives" > $file
1785 cat $gram.y >> $file
1786
1787 # Number of found conflicts.
1788 case $gram in
1789 (sr) sr_count=1; rr_count=0;;
1790 (rr) sr_count=0; rr_count=1;;
1791 (sr-rr) sr_count=1; rr_count=1;;
1792 esac
1793
1794 # Update number of expected conflicts: if %expect is given then
1795 # %expect-rr defaults to 0, and vice-versa. Leave empty if
1796 # nothing expected.
1797 case $sr_exp_i:$rr_exp_i in
1798 ?:) rr_exp_i=0;;
1799 :?) sr_exp_i=0;;
1800 esac
1801
1802 # Run tests.
1803 if test $sr_count -eq $sr_exp && test $rr_count -eq $rr_exp; then
1804 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]])[
1805 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]])[
1806 else
1807 {
1808 if test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test "$sr_count" -ne 0; then
1809 echo "warning: $sr_count shift/reduce conflicts"
1810 elif test "$sr_exp_i" -ne "$sr_count"; then
1811 echo "error: shift/reduce conflicts: $sr_count found, $sr_exp_i expected"
1812 fi
1813 if test -z "$rr_exp_i" && test "$rr_count" -ne 0; then
1814 echo "warning: $rr_count reduce/reduce conflicts"
1815 elif test "$rr_exp_i" -ne "$rr_count"; then
1816 echo "error: reduce/reduce conflicts: $rr_count found, $rr_exp_i expected"
1817 fi
1818 } | sed -e "s/^/$file: /" > experr
1819 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
1820 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
1821 fi
1822 done
1823 done
1824 done]
1825
1826 AT_CLEANUP