X-Git-Url: https://git.saurik.com/apt.git/blobdiff_plain/d8cba717e011eeae1be346325fd476f4caa753f3..3568a640bd363409cdeb1cb69eaa3261c79f2ff2:/apt-pkg/algorithms.cc?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/apt-pkg/algorithms.cc b/apt-pkg/algorithms.cc index e7703ca93..7c911b865 100644 --- a/apt-pkg/algorithms.cc +++ b/apt-pkg/algorithms.cc @@ -101,9 +101,7 @@ bool pkgSimulate::Install(PkgIterator iPkg,string /*File*/) DepIterator Start; DepIterator End; D.GlobOr(Start,End); - if (Start->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts || - Start->Type == pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks || - Start->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes || + if (Start.IsNegative() == true || End->Type == pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) { if ((Sim[End] & pkgDepCache::DepGInstall) == 0) @@ -695,9 +693,7 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::DoUpgrade(pkgCache::PkgIterator Pkg) { /* We let the algorithm deal with conflicts on its next iteration, it is much smarter than us */ - if (Start->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts || - Start->Type == pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks || - Start->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes) + if (Start.IsNegative() == true) break; if (Debug == true) @@ -926,9 +922,7 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::Resolve(bool BrokenFix) if a package has a dep on another package that cant be found */ SPtrArray VList = Start.AllTargets(); if (*VList == 0 && (Flags[I->ID] & Protected) != Protected && - Start->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts && - Start->Type != pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks && - Start->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes && + Start.IsNegative() == false && Cache[I].NowBroken() == false) { if (InOr == true) @@ -953,10 +947,7 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::Resolve(bool BrokenFix) at is not the currently selected version of the package, which means it is not necessary to remove/keep */ - if (Cache[Pkg].InstallVer != Ver && - (Start->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts || - Start->Type == pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks || - Start->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes)) + if (Cache[Pkg].InstallVer != Ver && Start.IsNegative() == true) { if (Debug) clog << " Conflicts//Breaks against version " @@ -974,9 +965,7 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::Resolve(bool BrokenFix) fiddle with the VList package */ if (Scores[I->ID] <= Scores[Pkg->ID] || ((Cache[Start] & pkgDepCache::DepNow) == 0 && - End->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts && - End->Type != pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks && - End->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes)) + End.IsNegative() == false)) { // Try a little harder to fix protected packages.. if ((Flags[I->ID] & Protected) == Protected) @@ -1083,10 +1072,8 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::Resolve(bool BrokenFix) } // Hm, nothing can possibly satisify this dep. Nuke it. - if (VList[0] == 0 && - Start->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts && - Start->Type != pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks && - Start->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes && + if (VList[0] == 0 && + Start.IsNegative() == false && (Flags[I->ID] & Protected) != Protected) { bool Installed = Cache[I].Install(); @@ -1132,9 +1119,7 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::Resolve(bool BrokenFix) Change = true; if ((Cache[J->Dep] & pkgDepCache::DepGNow) == 0) { - if (J->Dep->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts || - J->Dep->Type == pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks || - J->Dep->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes) + if (J->Dep.IsNegative() == true) { if (Debug == true) clog << " Fixing " << I.FullName(false) << " via remove of " << J->Pkg.FullName(false) << endl; @@ -1191,6 +1176,31 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::Resolve(bool BrokenFix) return true; } /*}}}*/ + +// ProblemResolver::BreaksInstOrPolicy - Check if the given pkg is broken/*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This checks if the given package is broken either by a hard dependency + (InstBroken()) or by introducing a new policy breakage e.g. new + unsatisfied recommends for a package that was in "policy-good" state + + Note that this is not perfect as it will ignore further breakage + for already broken policy (recommends) +*/ +bool pkgProblemResolver::InstOrNewPolicyBroken(pkgCache::PkgIterator I) +{ + + // a broken install is always a problem + if (Cache[I].InstBroken() == true) + return true; + + // a newly broken policy (recommends/suggests) is a problem + if (Cache[I].NowPolicyBroken() == false && + Cache[I].InstPolicyBroken() == true) + return true; + + return false; +} + // ProblemResolver::ResolveByKeep - Resolve problems using keep /*{{{*/ // --------------------------------------------------------------------- /* This is the work horse of the soft upgrade routine. It is very gental @@ -1235,9 +1245,12 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::ResolveByKeep() { pkgCache::PkgIterator I(Cache,*K); - if (Cache[I].InstallVer == 0 || Cache[I].InstBroken() == false) + if (Cache[I].InstallVer == 0) continue; + if (InstOrNewPolicyBroken(I) == false) + continue; + /* Keep the package. If this works then great, otherwise we have to be significantly more agressive and manipulate its dependencies */ if ((Flags[I->ID] & Protected) == 0) @@ -1245,7 +1258,7 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::ResolveByKeep() if (Debug == true) clog << "Keeping package " << I.FullName(false) << endl; Cache.MarkKeep(I, false, false); - if (Cache[I].InstBroken() == false) + if (InstOrNewPolicyBroken(I) == false) { K = PList - 1; continue; @@ -1295,11 +1308,11 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::ResolveByKeep() Cache.MarkKeep(Pkg, false, false); } - if (Cache[I].InstBroken() == false) + if (InstOrNewPolicyBroken(I) == false) break; } - if (Cache[I].InstBroken() == false) + if (InstOrNewPolicyBroken(I) == false) break; if (Start == End) @@ -1307,11 +1320,11 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::ResolveByKeep() Start++; } - if (Cache[I].InstBroken() == false) + if (InstOrNewPolicyBroken(I) == false) break; } - if (Cache[I].InstBroken() == true) + if (InstOrNewPolicyBroken(I) == true) continue; // Restart again.